Comments by "" (@josephcoon5809) on "Is Most Published Research Wrong?" video.

@JacobRy 😂 Yes. Climate has been changing for as long as Earth has had an atmosphere. 😂
1
@flightrisk7566 My initial reaction to this is that we need a better system to compile, collate, and curate the massive amounts of information that humanity has collected. Something along the lines of how the brain does it. I find that Nature has an uncanny ability to invent things millions or billions of years before we thought we invented it. Bacterial flagellar motors decentralized government Cloud computing 3D simulation Virtual reality Wind powered systems It’s crazy how much Nature figured out already…
1
@678friedbed 😂 Savage. 😂 I wouldn’t go as far as that, but I am skewed toward that disposition. 😂
1
@678friedbed You also reminded me of “Half-Baked.” “Uh… excuse me, janitor…” “Yes, scientist?” 😂 🤣😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣
1
@678friedbed Clearly, you have a limited imagination to come to such a limited conclusion.
1
@678friedbed 😂 “Admitting it”? Son, I’ve been doing nothing but explaining it. 😂
1
@idontwantahandlethough The thing about the rest of your rants is that you put on airs of some high level of intellect. If your intellect were truly that high, you would be developing solutions to “global warming” rather than justifying government take over of the free market. You should be able to develop a free market solution that people would CHOOSE to participate in.
1
The moment light strikes your photoreceptors, it ceases to be light and becomes electrochemical activations. Those activations create patterns that your cerebrum stores and defines multiple times as that information is processed from raw data to meaningful information from one level of understanding to the next. The last step is from your visual cortex to your prefrontal cortex. Computers do the exact same thing but they need humans to program those patterns…for now. This is why things like synesthesia and phantom limb syndrome occur. When data is received from the wrong source or transmitted to the wrong location, the simulation your consciousness is becomes corrupted. People see sounds when audio information is directed to the video input of your prefrontal cortex. People feel limbs that no longer exist because the circuits in the brain to process the data coming from sensory neurons still exist and “learn to code” by attaching themselves to circuits that are still active. Regardless of whether reality is a simulation, your PERCEPTION of it is absolutely a simulation.
1
@idontwantahandlethough If climate change were such an existential threat, the US would be invading every country that contributes to it more than we do. But we don’t.
1
@idontwantahandlethough As if to prove my point further, you respond with some vague comment that I have no idea what you are referring to. The virtual reality, or the “existential threat” of “climate change”?
1
@idontwantahandlethough At this point, you really haven’t offered anything to the conversation other than “you’re stupid” and “you’re wrong.” You have offered little else to respond to. This is what we call useless criticism because you give no path to correction.
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu You don’t seem to understand the “existential threat” that the foolish like to portray as “imminent.” Diplomacy takes time, and it takes even longer when the other party doesn’t see the world through the same myopic and short-sighted lens that the “diplomat” uses. People have legitimate existential threats facing them every day that a nebulous idea like “global warming/climate change” will not phase them. “Climate change” is a “First World” issue that a very tiny portion of the entire world is actually concerned about. When you threaten actual lives by stripping them of readily available energy dense methods of fueling their burgeoning economies, “diplomacy” ends up being an exercise in corporations sending lobbyists to government to draft thousand page bills for politicians to sign without reading and the foolish to cheer on based solely on the title. So, no. That is NOT all that I have considered, and I highly doubt that you considered a tenth of what I have considered.
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu Yes. What you remembered is one of many predictions based on highly parameterized suites of climate models. Do you know what “parameterized” means?
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu No. Do you realize humans can use gravity assist multiple times on the same escape path for a probe because we have the understanding of celestial mechanics AND the computing power to accurately model those paths for a tiny probe traveling long distances around massive solar bodies? We can predict how the star field is organized at any point on the planet millions of years ago or millions of years hence. What we cannot do is back cast to a point 100 years ago with current data and create an outcome that matches recorded data. THAT is how you test the veracity of a model: by eliminating variables the only way you can. Do you know what the difference between heat and temperature is?
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu How many predictions comport with “climate change” being an imminent threat? How many TOTAL predictions were made? Do you know why you won’t be able to answer those questions? Because ONLY the predictions that confirm that bias are published.
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu I was not suggesting that we start a world war. I was stating that if the threat was actually that imminent, that that would be the only viable option. Yes. America is by far better with green technologies than any other nation…because corporations write our laws. Thank you, you rest my case. If migration were actually occurring because of droughts AND floods, then you are obviously confused and do not have a clue which talking point to stick with. I’m surprised you didn’t invoke the rising sea levels that corporations aren’t even reacting to. Where are all the inland real estate purchases for the future waterfront real estate? No where because the people who manipulate everybody’s perspectives are billionaires and move people around at will. Didn’t you notice the all the tech billionaires made billions more off of the “pandemic”? Bezos himself went from nearly 100 BILLION to 200 BILLION in 2020. He was only worth 50 BILLION in 2016. You’re so focused on math and science that you do not understand because some “scientists” put their name on it, that you don’t see the repercussions of your ignorance. I told you that I considered FAR more than you do. Not only is world war not MY solution; I am actually working on commercially viable solutions that are government free. They are solutions that people would CHOOSE to partake in of their own free will. I have looked at solar panels and their completely ineffective designs in efficiency of application, deployment, and innovation. While this is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg (that is apparently melting), I don’t have time to explain more than that to someone who thinks they are the smartest person in the room. You see, son. The problem isn’t “climate change.” The problem is people thinking that government is the only solution to just about everything. So, I am not developing commercially viable carbon sequestration solutions because I believe we have the understanding or the computing power to know one way or another. I’m developing solutions because people are so easily duped into thinking that corporate run governments can be controlled by the people.
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu So, I will give you the benefit of the doubt in your engagement in a conversation using your third language, and chalk up you missing the sarcastic tone about world wars. However, the rest of your comments prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the only solution you have is to vote for the most popular and least qualified among us to solve these problems for us. That’s enough for me to understand you aren’t worth talking to anymore. Good luck with your illusion of “politics,” son.
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu “and that’s why you want even more corporate abilities you disagreeing with yourself.” Pay attention, son. An economy is based on people swapping solutions to each other’s problems. No problems… No solutions… No economy. If you ever shut up and think about the bigger picture, perhaps an idea will occur to you: “Why aren’t these problems being solved?” Now you know why. You cannot sell solutions to a problem that has been solved. This isn’t a scientific problem. It’s an economic one manufactured to sell all kinds of solutions that do not actually solve it. If you were legitimately concerned, YOU would be developing solutions s instead of hoping your words will convince somebody to be as useless as you and vote for somebody else to solve it. You are the biggest problem to all of this.
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu “their would be solutions…” but the reality is you think arguing about it is more productive than developing your own solutions as I have. You keep repeating the same tired arguments that I am not even making. It doesn’t matter what anybody thinks of YOU develop an actual solutions which involves freedom to choose to be a part of the solution. Relying on others to do it for you is the same as a baby crying because they cannot get their own food. Those who whine are those who are too useless to contribute to the solutions.
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu Listen to you. You are so smart to understand billions of years of climate mechanics, yet you cannot figure out how to develop solutions that do not involve forcing people to accept your genius. It’s pathetic, really.
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu The argument is no longer about whether “climate change” is an actual problem. The argument is about your inability to actually solve it.
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 You can understand billions of years of climate mechanics but not a couple centuries of economic mechanics. 🤣😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂😂🤣😂😂🤣😂🤣😇😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu The market won’t develop the solution. People in the market will…if they stop being useless. 😉
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu The reason why you can’t see any viable solutions is because you are focused on proving that there’s a problem… WHINING.
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu “Poorly educated” says the toddler whining about a problem he cannot solve. 😂
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu Dod you know growing two crops of hemp a year on 3.1 million square miles of land can completely offset industrial CO2 emissions at 2014’s rate of emissions? Of course you don’t. Do you know why I know? Because I have been working on solutions for that long and longer for other problems. The only reason I argue with people is to see who is actually passionate about solving theses problems instead of just whining about it Whirs which group you fall into. 😂
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu I watched the video. There are better solutions. I have a patent application filed on part of one of them. 😉 What do you have other than a bunch of talking points that you don’t understand?
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu “How can anyone solve a problems that involves billions of people?” Like I said. You don’t even understand a couple centuries worth of economic mechanics. 😂 You don’t have to keep proving my own point for me. I am fully capable of proving my own points. 😂
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu Every solution begins with an idea, genius. 😂
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu I understand capitalism enough to know it’s been around longer than humans have. Just because somebody labeled a basic economic mechanism billions of years after it manifested, it doesn’t mean it hasn’t been around. You sound like the kind of person who would say that atoms didn’t exist until they were discovered. 😂
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu “We have the tech…” That you have to FORCE people to use. 😂 GREAT solution, son. 😂
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu If motors can be considered capital, the. flagellar bacterial motors can be too. YOU said rocks. I did not. 😂 See ya, kid. I will be happy selling the solutions to your problems and making billions off of it. Thanks. 😂
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu I am not forcing people. What do you think government is for? To ask nicely? 😂 Christ. Third language or not, you’re just plain stupid.
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu You have no idea what the patent is on or what it is apart of, yet you THINK you know what you are talking about. 😂
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu “To operate in the interest of its population.” 🤣😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 BY passing laws and enFORCING them. Who’s got the problem with language? “I don’t want to force anybody to do anything. I want the government to do it for me.” 🤣😂😂😂😂🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu Define “capitalism” before you tell me what is not capitalism, dip$hit. 😂
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu “Free energy idiots.” You mean like the idiots who think government makes things “free”? 🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂🤣🤣🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu What physical laws don’t I understand? The quantum mechanics that describes how the Moon transmits its own light by absorbing radiation from the Sun? How reflected light is polarized parallel to the surface of reflection because the conduction band has a greater degree of freedom on the surface of a material?
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu How modern PV cells are barely 20% efficient since they do nothing with the 40% of the Sun’s irradiance in the IR frequencies, and convert only about a third of the power in the visible light range DESPITE caustic Pb doping of peroskvite? Or how the manufacturing process for solar panels make them completely unreasonable to recycle leaving landfill dumping the only viable end of life solution for solar panels?
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu Tell me what “physical laws I don’t understand. Perhaps how Black Tailed Prairie Dogs build mounds on some entrances to their burrows while leaving others flat so when wind blows over them, the mounds increase wind velocity and decreases air pressure creating a pressure difference between mounded entrances and flat entrances. Yeah. Even prairie dogs figured out wind power before humans along with HVAC. 😂
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu Or how about how most chloroplasts transmit TWO red wavelengths of light to break each of the two sigma bonds in H2O and two wavelengths of blue light to break each of the two pi bonds in CO2? Are those the physical laws that I don’t understand?
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu How is it useful to understand how light works? I don’t know. Plants sure do seem to think light is pretty important. Considering quantum biology just opened up to study the quantum mechanics of photosynthesis, I’m pretty sure Nature has some good insights into how to make our solar panels far more efficient. 😂 That patent is a couple years out, but the first one leads up to it. 😉
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu Do you realize that you can separate the functions of a solar panel into three main components leaving all the metallic, caustic, and rare-Earth components in a centralized location leaving the panels and optical power transmission components to be silica or optical polymers? Of course you didn’t because you didn’t bother to research on how to make solar panels commercially viable and easily accessible to the general population. And solar panels is barely five percent of what I am developing, so you are definitely useless with your whining.
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu I’m done here. You can bask in your complete ignorance and willful stupidity. Nearly eight billion people in this world, and I am hopeful a decent percentage are NOT as useless as you. Keep whining, son. People like you will make us rich. Cheers 🍻
1
@KeVIn-pm7pu 😂
1