Comments by "No Name" (@NoName-hg6cc) on "UsefulCharts" channel.

  1. No it doesn't. Italy was the center and it is the successor
    3
  2.  @robertominniti4115  Actually, people prefer Aimone, if there was a monarchy, but there isn't
    2
  3.  Hubertus Venator  The Prime Minister in Italy was NEVER elected but nominated by the Parliament, as we are a PARLIAMENTARY Republic. And the current Prime Minister is the best since long long time
    2
  4. South voted in 1946 to keep monarchy
    2
  5.  @maxpowers4436  Ahahahaha no, HRE is barbarian
    2
  6. Justice? How would be that just?
    2
  7.  @andygardner3300  not really
    2
  8. No. Not that many
    2
  9. Ritornare insignificanti? E perchè mai...
    2
  10. There is no such thing
    2
  11. AHAHAHAHAHAHA NO Italy is a Republic so there is no emperor. Anything else means a really poor knowledge of History
    1
  12.  @missamandaart9350  Which one?
    1
  13. Justinian
    1
  14. What? Sources?
    1
  15. AHAHAHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHAHAHA NO. Italy is the successor and being a Republic ...
    1
  16. Ps: Start STUDYING History
    1
  17.  @dainaandreetto510  Not many
    1
  18.  Hubertus Venator  The PdC is selected by the Parliament and proposed to the PDR. The Parliament proposed Draghi. Mattarella accepted. This is how Parliamentary democracy works The rest is just noise
    1
  19. LOL, you poor education is showing.
    1
  20. Italy is the true heir of Rome, like it or not
    1
  21. Nope. It's cultural more than blood. Russia haven't any ties. And Italy is a Republic anyway
    1
  22.  @theamazinghippopotomonstro9942  Yes. DNA didn't change but even so, culturally Italians descend from Romans
    1
  23. True, but neither are France or Spain. The successor and center of the Empire is a Republic
    1
  24. Spain didn't rule Latin Europe LOL And the only true successor, Italy, is a Republic. Even the cities that dominated the Mediterranean after Rome, Venice and Genoa, were Republics
    1
  25. Though Lombards were absorbed
    1
  26.  @xavierlauzac5922  It was a joke about Ancient Rome
    1
  27. Mario Draghi
    1
  28.  @bibored9784  Ha detto che il papa dovrebbe essere Re
    1
  29.  @andygardner3300  How is a state like the islamic ones "awesome"?
    1
  30.  @andygardner3300  No, they weren't. Are Islamic states good?
    1
  31.  @andygardner3300  Then Papal state is no good
    1
  32.  @andygardner3300  I don't understand yours
    1
  33.  @andygardner3300  Yes they are
    1
  34.  @andygardner3300  I don't see any major difference
    1
  35.  @andygardner3300  I did. How about you read more about it?
    1
  36.  @andygardner3300  And I concluded between Iran or Arabia and Papal states there aren't differences
    1
  37.  @andygardner3300  I did, I studied but you didn't and just want them to be different when History show, if you study it, that they are instead very similar
    1
  38.  @andygardner3300  How are they different?
    1
  39.  @andygardner3300  Rome statal structure existed from 700 BC to 400 AD. The Papal states were born around year 800 and were an abomination, repressive and theocratic. Not so different from today Iran
    1
  40.  @andygardner3300  Yes they were. They were anything except great. What does that have to do with anything? Beside, the Pope was against Italy so yeah, very similar to Iran. Or Saudi Arabia
    1
  41.  @andygardner3300  No, the illegitimate autocrat was against the people
    1
  42. Mario Draghi? Sure!
    1
  43. None of them, especially the Ottomans, can be heir
    1
  44. Italy is a Republic so...no emperor
    1
  45.  @missamandaart9350  Which document? Link please
    1
  46. Who?
    1
  47. None, Italy is a Republic
    1
  48. Ahahahahahaha he very likely wasn't
    1
  49.  @palatasikuntheyoutubecomme2046  He very likely wasn't LOL He was a barbarian
    1
  50. Actually he fought coalitions of Europeans, and English didn't show up until the very end....and they were losing
    1