Comments by "No Name" (@NoName-hg6cc) on "A BIG Step Towards a Federal Europe? (ft. UEF) - Part 2" video.

  1. Well, we could impose a super majority higher than 55%. Or make it so that 55% isn't enough and you need at least half of Europe or at least 12 countries
    9
  2. If an Federation is formed there will be laws and counterweights for all. But you are either in or out
    6
  3. To me it seems you want the advantages without the advantages. If you think the super majority will be made so Sweden and other Norther state can do as they please, dream on. As for immigration, it's time for ALL of the Union to decide. Meaning no country will be left alone and that if there one policy ALL of the Union will follow it. Harder measure and strict regulations? Very well, it does for all 27 countries
    6
  4.  @bjornSE  Many others contributed much more than you and have to deal with immigration issues and your nation vetoing solutions. We need a Federation, a just one but a Federation. You will either be in or be out. And that's it
    5
  5. One culture? One language? China is anything but. And USA aren't that united either. Learning more than one language is enriching. And yes, EU can definitely stand on par with China, India and USA
    5
  6.  @bjornSE  Like? Except Germany and France, which is anyway debatable, which have benefited more? Yeah, as I said a COMMON immigration policy that goes at border OF THE UNION, not one single state. But Mediterranean countries cannot be left alone with this burden, otherwise why should they help with Sweden and Finland problems? We need a Federation and if you want to stay out of it stay out but if you decide you are in there is no room to complain
    4
  7. You are making brexiters mistakes. Fact is, when brexited happened the regions who were mostly vocals saw their funds REDUCED. Meaning EU wasn't the problem
    4
  8. EU is already democratic but a Federation would be even more
    3
  9. Good
    3
  10.  @nenasiek  Who told you to you could rejoin? If you do that, believe me, I and others will lobby for all nations to vote against you JOINING, because as for uk, there won't be a re- anything.
    3
  11.  @bjornSE  "We don't want a common immigration policy because it would mean unlimited immigration" not if you stop immigrants at the border of the Union because that's the UNION policy. If you mean between countries part of the Union, well yes, but it's part of the deal Good, don't be a part of it then. But Drumpft doesn't say "I don't want New York to be part of USA because of common immigration policy", he propose harsher immigration policy at FEDERAL level (granted, I don't agree with him on most of the issues he talk about, I hear who says immigration as it is, it's a problem)
    3
  12.  @Wind_Falcon  It will have a bigger voice through the Federation. Do you know how Federations work?
    3
  13. You forget most of those countries do well because they are in the union. Paraguay bs Brazil: which country have the better economy? Nicaragua and Mexico?
    3
  14.  @didixtar2863  They would because their voice will be heard in the WORLD better than single nations. They would because they are protected and they may want to still have that protection, something that won't happen if EU collapse. Yeah, there are some issue. Dor example those small states might have to stop laundering money and getting money from other big countries, for example, Southern countries, because they are fiscal havens and issue questionable financial practices. Yes, France and Germany will need to curb excessive nationalism and work in the interest of all. But I think it's doable. Otherwise the economic union will break and those countries may find themselves in a worse economic situation
    3
  15. I think most of Europeans do already
    2
  16.  @DukeOfTheYard  "Identifies primarily" nobody does that not even at national level, region or city come first usually. They do however feel European. The Next Generation show perfectly the mutual assistance of Europeans countries
    2
  17.  @Wind_Falcon  It help with better patrol. It also help in international policy, it will have a voice whereas little countries don't
    2
  18. You could make a super majority above 55%. Or tie the percentage with a certain numbers of states. I'll propose you your same question: it is worth preserving some paltry notion of sovereignty at the cost of unity and the very future of all of Europe?
    2
  19.  @briancops3798  And I told you the answer likely lied within your government, not EU
    2
  20.  @briancops3798  The EU give funds, what thinking should she done? It's your government who should explain to you why it didn't invest them
    2
  21.  @briancops3798  No it doesn't, who told you that? Let me guess, some eurosceptic. A state can fund its own projects in its own regions. Ask yourself why yours don't
    2
  22. Lisbon Treaty isn't, sadly, a Constitution, thanks to the change YOU forced
    1
  23. ​ @firstpostcommenter8078 No it's not. Europeans already know one or more languages
    1
  24. Don't utilize the base of European culture while hoping for its destruction
    1
  25. Really? In USA there are laws USA state CANNOT refuse. Also, a federal budget. EU is more like America pre 1779
    1
  26.  @DukeOfTheYard  So you say. I met Romanians who first told the regions they were from. I think you see what you want to see I have met and have friend from many nations. They say Europeans first. So apparently it DOES exist
    1
  27.  @DukeOfTheYard  You can, like I can call bs on what you said. And I don't think he was from Transylvania, however this show ehat you wrote was a lie. Do you have proofs of Romanians or Hungarians or whatever said "I'm (nationality)" instead of "I'm from this region?" Austria will learn to deal with that. Like everyone in EU learnt, when it was time, to put common interest first
    1
  28. "going back treating the EU as common trade market" which never was. It was always about political union. But I don't hold it against you too much, you are Danish, you entered late and with the same misconceptions as the English
    1
  29. ​ @steffensegoviahelbo5065  There are compromises to be made but a Federation is the only path fowards. And well, if you don't like it you Danes can always exit...
    1
  30. It's actually a good idea for everyone, Poland included
    1
  31. ​ @MstrPablo  EU is nothing like EU and if you cannot see this you deserves Putin. However if Polish feel that way you can always exit
    1
  32. "Centralized powers bad" goes for your nation too( which is...)? Only a Federation can overcome the challenges of the future
    1
  33. I think we are stronger together and yes, if Poland was attacked everyone would defend it
    1
  34.  @bjornSE  Nobody will be forced to, there will be a vote and I think it can be made so that some internal affairs are carried out by the states. And no, we don't need English exceptionalism thank you. Happy new year
    1
  35.  @nenasiek  You cannot REJOIN, you'd have to join. Do what you feel like you need to do
    1
  36.  @Wind_Falcon  Nope, with the Federation they will have more voice internationally, while in a big democracy
    1
  37. A Federation would allow Europeans to be among the superpowers and decide our own destiny instead of kneeling in front of China, India, USA
    1
  38. Why would USA become fascist?
    1
  39. ​ @HelionDark Actually EU was envisioned as union of partners but kinda derailed on the way. It's up to us to bring it back ok the right path
    1
  40. Lombardy and Sicily share more than you think. And state won't be dismembered as they will be the columns that support the Federation
    1
  41. ​ @ant_cosacco1306 Don't tell me, you vote Lega Nord 🙄 You forget that both had Normans influence. That they BOTH influenced each other before any foreign influence and AFTER. And no, they wouldn't be dead weight, they in fact might be economic engines for Europe as a whole
    1
  42. YES! YES! YES! You can leave if you don't like it, as a country or as individual
    1
  43. I don't think it would work for EU
    1
  44. More power to EU is good. If Netherlands doesn't like it or can leave 😂
    1
  45. ​​ @themarcel508 EU needs a federal structure
    1
  46. Weird reading this from an AMERICAN but thank you anyway. We know you are reliable allies and USA will be stronger with a Federal Europe
    1
  47. ​ @miquelcanosasanteularia1678  Democracy in its highest form...is it? Or it is easy for populist to make you believe that?
    1
  48. I wonder what country are you from. Well, if you hate it so much and your countrymen share your sentiment it will be a goodbye
    1
  49. It was never only about that
    1
  50. ​ @maxsnel5705 And your country is? If if that's what you people want, better put than in. For us too
    1