Comments by "No Name" (@NoName-hg6cc) on "Garibaldi: The Siege of Rome | Unifying Italy | Extra History | Part 3" video.

  1. ​ @john_fortres BS. He is not
    10
  2. Actually, 1848 went national, for a while
    6
  3. ​ @john_fortres They are
    6
  4.  @Wolfeson28  Actually, IT WAS. It just didn't happen until 1800, because of the egoism and blindness of Italian leaders and chief of state in the previous centuries
    4
  5. ​ @ElQPrometePerfume  They left a lot not said
    3
  6.  @john_fortres  Nobody does
    3
  7. 1848 Italians did fight together, for a while against Austria. And Venetians did raise the tricolore
    2
  8. Thank you. Respect to Persia
    2
  9.  @BoxStudioExecutive  Except Italian were known by middle and high part of society
    2
  10. You are both right and wrong. He didn't act fittingly on some occasions, also he failed to see his idea of Italy, a republic made by the people for the people, could not form. But he did fight all his life for Italy and he forsaw some changes and even problems Italy could face( as Garibaldi did). All that said, I think his contribution to Italy is important. Had Italy already being formed he may have been it's greatest President. Alas, we'll never know
    1
  11. That's Cavour
    1
  12. Well said
    1
  13. ????
    1
  14. And?
    1
  15.  @john_fortres  E ch doveva fare?
    1
  16.  @john_fortres  Doubt that
    1
  17.  @john_fortres  He is not
    1
  18.  @john_fortres  Why would he be?
    1
  19.  @john_fortres  I doubt it
    1
  20.  @john_fortres  Go study Real History
    1
  21.  @john_fortres  I know people from the South and you should stop speaking for them
    1
  22.  @john_fortres  I'm not what? Ignorant? I know
    1
  23.  @john_fortres  contrary to you I'm not
    1
  24.  @john_fortres  I'd suggest you start studying REAL History though
    1
  25. ​ @neutronalchemist3241 Prussia? Yes, they were. Garibaldi won
    1