Comments by "No Name" (@NoName-hg6cc) on "euronews" channel.

  1.  @roysmith8679  You need to be clairvoyant...ok English belong to everyone that knows it. Not you apparently.
    1
  2.  @roysmith8679  It was sarcastic but okay, you don't understand simply English, no wonder you don't catch sarcasm, not even clairvoyance would be enough
    1
  3.  @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714  No, he was a true European.
    1
  4.  @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714  Riso abundant...
    1
  5.  @nigeljohnson9820  God save the Queen? Shouldn't be "May our glorious Party live forever with our ussk state"?
    1
  6.  @nigeljohnson9820  I didn't know in uk you said "heil", I thought it was hi
    1
  7.  @nigeljohnson9820  And we leave the Queen to the English and those who like aristocracies like uk. Not that it matters: soon English will need lube because of Americans, Chinese, Indians and Europeans
    1
  8. Go out of EU
    1
  9. And were Nazis right to want a free Polish Europe? How does that sound to you?
    1
  10. ​ @spencera1129 Really democratic...
    1
  11. EU will thrive and make History, Nazi ussk Titanic will sink and become history
    1
  12.  @Luna-nj9zd  exactly!
    1
  13. You should ask uk
    1
  14.  @a2eoas  Saving Europe? By making dictatorships where judges are under corrupted executives like Orban's?
    1
  15.  @orlinasokolova3015  Well, Macron didn't try to put judiciary power under his, Orban and his gang did, EU doesn't allow that and for this is very democratic, plus it has standard on human right, but Hungary and Poland probably don't respect those either,,,,
    1
  16. Typical. They are in EU but want to do as they please. If they ate against EU laws and rules they can exit
    1
  17.  @tefky7964  Because it's an union of different countries who CHOSE and AGREED the rules for that union. If one country cannot accept it it can exit. Bit it cannot stay and do as it please
    1
  18.  @tefky7964  If they do they can, they just have to ask like uk did. Why aren't they doing that? Beside, single governments wouldn't be useless, they would just have less power, but that power would be transferred, democratically, to EU institutions. Again, if you don't like an institution, you leave, you don't demand to do whatever you like
    1
  19.  @jameselder720  Ahahahahahaha no, deindustrialization was happening already and would have hit harsher if it wasn't for the EU, a big market that propped uk dying economy Ps: by the way, North oil is Scotland's
    1
  20.  @jameselder720  Not as much as "EU contributed to british deindustrialization". What proofs do you have? I never said you said something, I just pointed out
    1
  21.  @jameselder720  You cannot ask question without showing proofs
    1
  22.  @jameselder720  And until your statements is backed by proof, you have no right to pose questions
    1
  23.  @jameselder720  By your logic you are the one wrong, since you don't have "bIg EvIDeNCe" and you are the first one to ask proofs, despite presenting none You really don't get what is an argument, do you?
    1
  24.  @jameselder720  I understand the rules of a debate, the first one being before asking for proofs make sure you showed your own. Not doing so it's hypocrisy. Therefore, you should have showed evidence before asking any. But, as I said, you don't know the rules of a discussion
    1
  25.  @jameselder720  You don't understand how discussion works. When you claim something you have to provide proofs, otherwise you cannot ask others. You didn't provide anything
    1
  26.  @jameselder720  Sorry, but the only making up rules it's you. It's not a rule in any discussion. As I pointed out, by following your rule the first one claiming ridiculous things will always get away without need to prove them. You have to provide proofs first
    1
  27.  @jameselder720  I'm not making up anything, just stating the rule of any discussion, let'ss see if you are able to understand them 1) Persona A make statements and bring proofs 2) Person B make statements and brings proofs 3) There is a debate on the statistic and numbers Now, how you made the conversation go: 1) you made a statement, without showing any backing 2) I made another statement 3) you showed no proof whatsoever but dare ask me proof, which is not allowed Now, am I talking to a person or playing chess with a pigeon? You made a big statement first, you ought to show evidence
    1
  28.  @jameselder720  "2) Person B questions Person A's statement and (if they wish) makes a counter-statement of their own. 3) Person A answers Person B's questions and (if they wish) questions Person B's counter-statement and makes a further counter-statement of their own." that's something you made up. I could make any statement, no matter how ludicrous, then ask you to prove yours first. That's not how it works, a statement like that require proofs backing it up, but you didn't. You clearly don't know how discussion work, so as I said, it's playing chess with a pigeon, Come back after you've learned, kiddo, or when you want to learn from yours better (me)
    1
  29.  @jameselder720  LOL, quite self centered and arrogant, are you? I didn't make anything up, I'm going by the rules of discussion that YOU don't know or don't want to follow, hypocritically accusing others of doing so....As I pointed out Again, come back when you are willing to have a debate by the book, not by your weird rules. Ta-tah
    1
  30.  @jameselder720  LMAO, you are willing to discuss only by your made up, hypocrite rules, according to which you can state whatever pa pass in your mind without further proofs requiring, which is not the way to discuss things
    1
  31.  @jameselder720  As I said, there are rules which you should try to understand. There is nothing dishonest in trying to prevent an hypocrite to run and ruin a debate
    1
  32.  @jameselder720  Yes, you abide by the rules you made up, but everyone else prefers to stand by the classic rules of the discussion and not something you made up
    1
  33.  @jameselder720  I didn't make anything up, it's the rules of every discussion. Either you get it or you don't, but they won't chage for you
    1
  34.  @jameselder720  You did make them up, as I pointed out( something you failed to do). The rules of discussion are the one I wrote and explained, the ones you refuse to accept. As I said: ta-tah until you accept the Truth and the rules for a meaningful discussion
    1
  35.  @jameselder720  Yes, you did. You keep repeating the same bs again and again. Foe the last time: goodbye until you learn the TRUE rules. Ps: if you crave the last word that bad I'll let you have it
    1
  36.  @jameselder720  Okay, one last time, I have to point it out how I decided to give an hypocrite child, who cannot understand the difference between The Rules of discussion and the rules he made up, a shallow "victory" . But feel free to enjoy this "great victory", boast if it at the kindergarten, I'm sure the other kids will be impressed Now it's over
    1
  37.  @edwardharris5301  If you don't show proofs of your claims, yes. And you people showed nothing
    1
  38.  @ThatCarGuy1983  what the hell is the troll in the original post talking about?
    1
  39. Fine for us. Good riddance ussk
    1
  40.  @richardgarysmith  Nazi ussk Titanic will sink, I'm sorry for Scots and Northern Irish
    1
  41.  tehanomander  it's London that's gonna be cut from the continent
    1
  42.  tehanomander  Yes it will. You will see. Ahahahah that's a question you should ask yourself, brexiter. Add "Why am I so deluded and use wishful thinking instead of facts?" Study, boy, study a lot. And good luck, you will need it 😉
    1
  43.  tehanomander  uk had 4 years to prepare a back up plan...you said EU needed uk more than uk needed EU AND YET here you are still begging for a deal, after threatening leaving... What a clown you are...🤣 Sorry but the City know it's going to pose the majority of its finances services and the fact brexiters supporter still believe their self importance it's laughable at best, if I was British I would have been a little more humble
    1
  44. It still is you mean
    1
  45. @MARX NAP People want a big shop, not a small shop that fancy itself big. Like US, Japan, Bejong. No one want a market as small as uk is
    1
  46. @MARX NAP You clearly know nothing about financial services
    1
  47. @MARX NAP Ahahahahahaha sure ahahahahahaha
    1
  48. @MARX NAP Ahahahahahaha a pre schooler says he has knowledge, totally believable. Oh right, I don't because whatever you say it's bs
    1
  49.  @nancytolman  uk is whining and in bad faith since 2016 and it's showing that bad faith by threatening not one but TWO international agreements: WA and GFA
    1
  50.  @erissolipsis23  correction, uk had to leech one giant, EU, to survive
    1