Comments by "No Name" (@NoName-hg6cc) on "Fire of Learning" channel.

@TheDAWinz Italians are Romans descendants
70
@si7h7e No, not really
41
@LetsGoGetThem Because he was, even though it abandoned Corsica. Ahahahahahaha military prowess and France don't go well next to each others, you can see his genius was from a certain Peninsula but even that could bring French only that far.... As for the Spanish, LMAO They would see different Italian empires, Venice's and Genova's, Italy culture astonishing the world twice, in 1500 and in the 60s of 1900 and see how their children carried their spirit.
9
@kradonkragon2151 "99% of those forces that were so impressive (militarily) were mercenaries and often not even Italian" false. The majority was Italian, especially in Middle Ages, and especially in Venice
6
@Dies_iræ_666 Actually no, Italians are homogenous for Gene's as for cultures, there less difference than in Germany or Greece, which it's a mixture of Turk, Slavs, Italians( Venetians), genetically and culturally too. Italy is also the closer culturally you get to Rome
4
@Dies_iræ_666 The Nation was born BEFORE the state and you could notice because even in the past the people were the basically the same, North or South, this is a Fact, like it or not. Ps: many doesn't mean majority
4
@Dies_iræ_666 E io ti ho scritto approfonditamente l'origin della cultura e della NAZIONE ITALIANA, che siamo uniti è un fatto, certo che l'Italia è varia ma è anche una, se vuoi confutare questo fatto porta argomenti convincenti. Dai, vai a studiare
4
@Dies_iræ_666 Dire la verità è offendere? Faresti ridere chiunque abbia un poco di cultura e conoscenza, oltre che renderti ridicolo di fronte a tutti gli altri, visto che non c'è MAI stata una maggioranza pro indipendenza. Parte del dialetto sicialiano fa parte della lingua italiana, che non è solo fiorentino, fin fal Medioevo. La polenta c'è al nord, in Lombardia e Ttentino, come negli Abruzzi e nel Molise, i tipi di pasta ( gnocchi, tortellini, maccheroni) si trovano dappertutto e da molto tempo. Il baccalà si mangia anche al Nord e le maschere sono conosciute in tutta italia. Prova a chiedere ad un parigino cos'è il morue sèche non lo sa, o ad u heeco se conosce l'alevropita( sai cos'è?), dubito lo sappiano,il cornetto invece è diffuso ovunque in Italia. La Storia in comune inizia con i Romani e prosegue nei secoli dopo, nel Medioevo. Romani che, fra l'altro, avevano nell'Italia, isole comprese, il centro dell'Impero, senza divisioni, quelle te le sei inventate tu. Te l'ho detto, dovresti studiare e portare prove, io non ho tempo né voglia di insegnare ad un'asino come te( chiedo scusa all'asino per il paragone) partendo da zero, sarai sempre un regionalista buzzurro e senza uno straccio di argomento che s'arrabbia quando li si fa notare che la sua regione è parte di un insieme, perché ti credi speciale ( lo sei ma in un altro senso rispetto a quello che dici tu). Caro zoomer, per te meno internet e porno e più libri, altrimenti continuerai a fare figuracce
4
@UriahD85 about what?
3
@ALIN DANIEL POPESCU Italy also won 1 WW fighting pretty much alone
3
@Dies_iræ_666 You showed no proof or anything, you are too anti Italian to see the Truth and instead tell the fairy tale thst we are divided, we were Nation long ago and we will be in the future, despite pathetic,useless lies Ps: I doubt you are Italian
3
@Dies_iræ_666 Sei sei ignorante e cerebroleso non posso farci nulla, io ti ho spiegato perchè siamo nazione, tu hai solo contato storielle e balle, forse qualcuno ci casca, perchè è al tuo livello, da asilo nido, di studio, io no. Per prima cosa qui i secessionisti sono una minoranza, in Spagna Catalonia, Paesi Baschi, Andorra tutti vorrebbero separarsi, così come il Nord Epiro e le altre regioni greche. Secondo, un siciliano è molto più simile ad un lombardo di quanto un provenzale o di un bavarese e un prussiano o un greco delle isole e uno del continente. Se si parlassero in dialetto neppure loro si capirebbero, stessa cosa per le differenze regionali e i piatti, con la differenza che in Italia ci sono tradizioni, costumi e una Storia comune. Puoi far fesso uno straniero o qualcuno della tua contrada che, come te, non ha mai viaggiato, non me, il tuo regionalismo ed estremismo anti italianismo ti rende irrazionale ed è, francamente, patetico
3
@ls200076 Byzantines were not. Byzantium was Greek
2
@keyos1955 I am not Greek. They were not Romans. Their language, heritage and culture was more Greek since 700 AD at least HRE called itself Roman too. It means nothing
2
@UriahD85 That's my question exactly, what?
2
@alvaro6587 AHAHAHAAH nope. Spanish wouldn't have explored anything had not been for Italian sailors and bankers
2
@charleouel9012 Yes, it's different, but it has many of the previous civilization characteristic
2
@LetsGoGetThem In WW1 it qas the best among the allies, the only one to defeat its enemy when Allies couldn't win 3 vs 1
2
@Dies_iræ_666 No true, despite the differences the similarities are more than the difference: the language (Italian is, like Sardinian a language, Veneto is a dialect), the culture etc...the separatist are a minority, unlike countries like Spain(Catalonia, Pais Vascos), France(Brittany, Corsica), Greece( Northern Epirus), these countries are evidently less united
2
@Dies_iræ_666 Me too bro and they are a minority . Italians are Italians, they are not the French (who are English and Germanic), Germans( Germanic, Hunnish etc...) Greeks( Tirkish and Slavs), Italy is way more united ethnically and culturally
2
@keyos1955 Not really, they were Greeks in a Greek empire
1
@keyos1955 And you are not? Of which nationality are you? Nope: Greek was indeed an important language of the empire but the administrative language was always Latin, it wasn't so in the BYZANTINE empire. Again, HRE called themselves Romans but they weren't, just like Byzantines. Their culture was Greek in everything, architecture, economic military and religion included. And Romans loved Greeks but weren't Hellenicized
1
@keyos1955 And how come you are so ignorant? Maybe you didn't pay attention. Again no, Greek was important only on the East past but the administrative language was Laton, when there was a Roman empire. Again, if you consider your "bUT tHEy CalLEd thEMsELVes RomANs" a valid argument you should give a pass to all HRE emperors. It doesn't mean anything the fact they called themselves that way, East Roman Empire was no more by the time Heraclius came to power. Their only tie with Rome was political but in the West there were much more ties at that point. Ahahahahahaha then tell me about Orthodox Christianity being the religion of Ancient Rome please. You make a good clown: did you know Ancient Rome was pagan and only in 300 it became Christian, CATHOLIC christianity? And not all of the Empire coverted on the spot Stop making a fool of yourself, trust me
1
@keyos1955 You keep telling bs and I can't understand why you do. Are you a bot? Yes, East Roman Empire morphed into something different with time. It's not that in 476 they stopped being Roman but in time they weren't anymore, despite having a close ties. Again, Greek was important BUT THE ADMINISTRATIVE LANGUAGE even in the East was Latin, which was the most important language in the West, this is important because, you like it or not, the language define a civilisation Again, they had ties but weren't Rome, otherwise HRE was the Roman Empire as well, they called themselves Romans! Christianity, CATHOLIC Christianity the one with the centre the Pope, was the official religion with Constantine in 300, until then and even some time after that they were pagans, so your crap about religion is utterly irrelevant. Was Christianity a Roman religion? For a bit, towards the end. Was Orthodox Christianity a Roman religion? *NO*. FULL STOP. There is a clear distance between the two and Romans did only know the first, like it or not. So Byzantine Religion? Greek. Architecture? Greek/Medievsl Greek Law? Roman, but with HEAVY Greek influences Military tactics and structure? Byzantine/ Medieval Greek, Roman's didn't have that structure Political? Again, Medieval Greek, Romans didn't have the military to lead politics. So again, they were not Romans anymore since 700 AD at least. The last Roman Emperor was Justinian
1
@keyos1955 How can you be so asinine and yet so conceited? Language is a VERY IMPORTANT part of a civilization. The notion Greeks and their language disappeared along with Greek's culture is, frankly, ridiculous. It's a fact East Roman Empire slowed morphed into something different, otherwise you'd have to accept HRE is Roman as well. Greek was a second language in the Roman Empire BUT Latin was the most important one. The fact they used the GREEK word BASILEUS instead of the LATIN imperator show they were not the same thing. By the time of Heraclius East Roman Empire was long gone LMAO, Orthodox Christianity is NOT the religion Romans knew, explain to me what it has to do with to Romans the fact a Greek in a GREEK capital (the capital of the ROMAN EMPIRE couldn't be anything else than Rome) claimed that as the real religion? They didn't even know what it was, it didn't exist in the Roman Empire, in NEVER existed in the Roman Empire. You are beyond pathetic. AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA do you even know the difference between an EX military taking office as a civilian and someone still in the army taking office? Romans didn't have that! For your sake, open a book, you are making a fool of yourself
1
@keyos1955 Ok, you are clearly a case of return illiteracy. Again, in the Roman state it was not usual, except in case of coups. And Consuls were nominated generals, not the contrary, genius! Constantinople was the part of the EAST Roman Empire and then of Byzantine Empire. Greeks didn't disappear, the notion is ridiculous. Now you can run, possibly towards a library. If you want the last word, take it. I've had it to correct your inaccuracies and flawed knowledge
1
@keyos1955 Ahahahahahaha you keep showing you lack of knowledge, your country''s school system( by the way, you didn't tell what country is that) must be really poor. You keep saying that name but it's an exception: especially during the Republic the consul were politicians, even if they had a military past and only in case of war those with military qualities were favoured. And no, Constantinople was the capital of the East, not the whole empire, it was one of the two capital the other was Rome. Now I'll really leave you the last word and advice: read an History book and stop making a fool of yourself
1
@keyos1955 Ok, but I think this is the last time, as I cannot afford to mend the lacks in your instruction for free. I'm not saying it's you, even though maybe your lack of effort and curiosity is part of the problem, your country's school system is to blame Again, you cannot make the difference between someone still in the military becoming consul and a civilian. Casear became a civilian to be consul, like Scipius, Marc Anthony, Augustus etc... When war broke of course consuls with military expertise were chose but they weren't military . In the Byzantine empire there was a military aristocracy that didn't exist in the Roman state, not even during the Roman Empire. Again no, Constantinople became capital LIKE ROME, but only of the East part. Look you might consider a career as a 🤡, History is not for you
1
@keyos1955 You'd really make a good clown, you are pathetically funny and really and yet so self important. Again, the Consul had the imperium only in case of war and they were NOT standing general during their mandate. It doesn't matter what his concerns were, he LEFT THE COMMAND when becoming consul. The Roman aristocracy was anything except military, this statement show how poor your knowledge really is . Sources? It became capital of the EASTERN part. You are as dumb as an ox. Keep making a fool of yourself and entertaining me, that's the only reason I keep reading your blabber
1
@keyos1955 Again, you are blabbing. The consul had the imperium in case of war and general left the troops when they took the office. And that 95% of time at war is probably bs. You couldn't match with an army on Rome. The Consul were elected civilians whi held dome degree of military power but were not in the command of an army Ahahahahahaha you know versus honotum had only ONE path which was military, ox? Go back to school, possibly out of your country, school system sucks there. "As the EASTERN capital of the empire, the city was named Nova Roma; most called it Constantinople, a name that persisted into the 20th century. on 17 January 395, when the city became the capital of the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire." Come on clown, male me laugh more. Ps: At least you don't keep insisting on religion and language, even you realized how pathetic and ridiculous you were
1
@keyos1955 It's not that disappeared, it's that wasn't used as much as you said. Blab as much as you want ox, but Roman politic wasn't purely military as in Byzantine Empire. And Cursus Honorum wasn't only a military path. AHAHA I cannot say something as RIDICULOUS and PATHETIC as saying "grEEks DisAPPEared", about which I talked last, so yes, you conceded defeat. Well, you were defeated from the start since you gave no arguments about it, only logic fallacies. keep making a fool of yourself, ox
1
@keyos1955 We better agree to disagree and move on, this discussion is never gonna end
1
@keyos1955 Where are yours? When are you gonna answer to mine question? You said Cursus Honorum was military but it wasn't only military, like it wasn't Roman politics. Sure, there were those with military background but others,like Cicero, did not have the military command, they were mostly civilian. This didn't happen in late Byzantine Empire. Greeks civilization didn't disappear, civilization almost never disappear, the culture may change but the root remain. You should have learnt how to read and argue, you couldn't understand my statements nor rebut them, you only used spite and logical fallacies, and load of bs. I try it again, for the last time:East Roman Empire didn't disappear, it gradually morphed into something different, by the time Eraclio died the Empire was Roman no more. It has ties, sure, but it wasn't Rome. Stop. If you think differently, for the last time, let's agree to disagree and move on
1
@keyos1955 True, but since you seem to ignore History and Reality and I'm tired of schooling you, let's just agree we have different opinions.
1
@keyos1955 Ahahahahahaha Ahahahahahahahahhahahahahaha you had to think for TWO DAYS and you came up with the sane bs? Cursus Honorum was a trail of different paths AMONG WHICH there was a military one, but that's it. Cicero was a politician, not a general, he wasn't chose to be Consul for his military qualities. Greek civilisation didn't disappeared if Greek culture survived, this is an Historical Truth. Seem that you didn't study what make a civilisation, its culture, among the other things you didn't study. I say that you didn't reply because you didn't and seeing the crap you spitting that was probably for the best. From Roman Kingdom to Roman Republic to Roman Empire costumes, language etc...didn't changed, between Roman Empire, East Roman Empire included, and the Greek Byzantine Empire it did. So what you say makes no sense. Again, it was Roman indeed until Eraclio. Then it turned something different, which I NEVER said it was like Ancient Greece but close to Greece than to Rome in some aspect and totally new from Ancient Era in others (Medieval Hellade) You didn't bring any argument or proof to support your thesis, oy logical fallacies so the issue is moot. Let's just agree to disagree and move on.
1
@keyos1955 Again with your bs. I can't help but laugh at the pathetic crap you are spouting. Cursus Honorum was a mostly civilian path, not a military one. Your education, as I said, it's abysmal, you can't even open a book or look on google. Pathetic Praetor were not only military but also magistrate. Did Cicero also had a military background? Of course, but that's not why he was chosen as consul, WHICH WAS A CIVILIAN OFFICE, not a military one. The fact he COULD move the army it doesn't make it a predominantly military society. Rome was a warrior.city but it did not based its civilisation on the army, like Byzantines. Culture is what makes a civilisation, even a kindergarten know this. The fact civilisation are not alive it doesn't mean they disappeared, an Historian or someone who REALLY love History would know this. No, between Roman Kingdom, Republic and Empire it changed little, something changed yes but not as much as it did after 476 onward, like the language, capital,architecture, state structures, identity, etc... changed you refused to discuss further relying on logical fallacies. I'm still waiting for proofs and arguments from you but I'll probably wait in vain, so let's agree to disagree and stop here.
1
@keyos1955 Anyone who read this conversation and has a minimum oh History knowledge understand you know nothing about Cursum Honorum and Roman History in general. You can go on making a fool of yourself but you cannot get upset when someone makes fun of you for it. Do you know what "not only" means? I'll make an example: not only your History knowledge is poor but also you reading skills are. Wikipedia could be a good place as anything for you to start, you'd would avoid looking this pathetic. Most of magistrate duty had nothing to do with military power. You keep insisting they are military, while I have said they were NOT ONLY( read on the vocabulary what "not only" means) military but also civil, most predominantly And you keep saying it was predominantly military: like if making laws and keeping treasury in check was military matter. 😂 Again, you use disappear like the ties of those civilisations and the new never existed. Again, civilisation DON'T DIE, they CHANGE. You didn't show any argument or proof and the only thing you did quote didn't actually support your thesis. And you dare asking me? I showed you how, from language to architecture, Byzantines distanced themselves from Roman, Sophia church included! Again, I'm tired of schooling you, so let's agree to disagree, or if you want to go on bring proofs of your bs. Of course you cannot so you keep acting stupid hoping to tire me off I told you before, if t is having the last word your real objective, all you had to do is ASKING. 😉
1
@keyos1955 Where are yours? Are you trying to dodge the questions? As I SAID Cursus Honorum was a military/political Greek civilization didn't disappear, that's the Historical Truth. You confuse civilization and culture with State, which has no sense. You should have studied that, but your knowledge is still that of a kindergarten. You couldn't make an argument or bring any proof, you only dealt in logical fallacies, acting childish and resentful, spitting bs and rage toward me, who was simply trying to teach you History
1
@keyos1955 I even tried to stop this pointless debate but you, being the whining child you are, keep going. Look, if you want the last word, have it. You just have to say it
1
@cassiegray5158 what about you? I'm a male and I didn't call friends/ other false accounts to help me, friends who write with an awful grammar. So your "arguments" bring zero values. Exactly like his posts.
1
The Nova renaissance they would recognize Italy as well
1
@charleouel9012 Not that much different, not really
1
@MultiAnis21 Did you see the comment I was answering to?
1
@ALIN DANIEL POPESCU Yeah, I get it, it's not your strong point.......
1
@herzkine What do you mean?
1