Comments by "No Name" (@NoName-hg6cc) on "The Armchair Historian" channel.

  1. The Entente did the same though and 3vs1 couldn't defeat the German army. Italy at least managed to win against AH ps: Italy was already winning in 1916 and won the majority of those battles
    2
  2. N, it's: England run away, USA fight war and lose against people in black pajamas, Russians collapse 🤣
    2
  3. Someone should have told English and French
    2
  4. Italy didn't change side and won alone With Germany you win battles but lose war. 😄 Only Slavs, French and English manage to be worse.
    2
  5. Italy was winning in 1916 though
    2
  6.  @HREguy  No, Italians better defensive strategy and bravery saved Italy
    2
  7.  @nick0875  Nope, Italians defeated AH after a great struggle and after Serbia and Russia were beaten or retired. Germany couldn't defeat Russia 3 vs1 and the allies achieved a "victory" against Germans in the sense they surrendered, not that they were beaten( again, 3vs1)
    2
  8.  @Oda__Nobunaga  Ahahahaa no, he should have studied the art of war, like you should be studying History of eating sand, but alas
    2
  9.  @giacmon85  That's exactly why Italians are the closest to Rome: CULTURE
    2
  10.  @freedomordeath89  Magari tu sei così. Ma è un problema tuo
    2
  11.  @sceplicur8817  wrong
    2
  12.  @freedomordeath89  Alla fine basta quello che altri ti hanno già detto: un conto è essere nazionalisti, un tro è essere patred amare il Paese pur criticando i difetti. Un'altro ancora è sparare a zero.
    2
  13.  @freedomordeath89  "Ho argomentato per filo e per segno perchè l'esercito italiano era demotivato, incompetente, inefficace. Non hai controargomentato in nessun modo " dove? Ah, quando hai scritto "l'ItaLIA fA sCHifO gne Gne"? Ma guarda che non devo mica interpretare. Nè io devo argomentare a queste cazzate. Ti è stato detto che l'Italia ha dato e da natali a grandi menti, basta vedere gli scienziati come la Capua e che c'è differenza fra la critica argomentata è le stronzate che ti escono dalla bocca, ma tu non hai fatto altro che rispondere "sIEte faxxisti, xenophobi, italianuzzi etc..." questo NON è argomentare, è il vaneggiamento sconclusionato che mostra l'astio di un poveraccio insoddisfatto e irrealizzato. Se fossimo come ci dipingi com'è che l'Italia è l'ottava potenza industriale, dopo essere stata a lungo la quarta, del pianeta? Come mai continuiamo a stupire? Forse ci sono aspetti positivi, oltre al negativi? Ora vai a studiare cosa vuol dire argomentare
    2
  14.  @ninostekar5183  We have street named after the criminal butcher Tito
    2
  15. Or the battles on the Western Front
    2
  16. True, but all generals were like this "The nation must be taught to bear losses. No amount of skill on the part of the higher commanders, no training, however good, on the part of the officers and men, no superiority of arms and ammunition, however great, will enable victories to be won without the sacrifice of men’s lives. The nation must be prepared to see heavy casualty lists" "At the present time I think our action should take the form of 1. Winter ‘sports’ or raids continued into the Spring. 2. Wearing out fight similar to 1 but on a larger scale at many points along the whole front. " Do you know who said this?
    2
  17. Who's to say? The Entente may have won anyway, lost or be forced to come to a compromise.
    2
  18. Lo è stata. Si fosse schierata con la Triplice Alleanza la Francia sarebbe crollata It was. Had Italy sided with The Triple Alliance, France would have fallen
    2
  19. Poland: "Russia is invading us, send help!!" uk and France: new number, who's this?
    2
  20. Italy fought alone in WW1, uk couldn't win 3 vs1 USA are pathetic and lost against people in black pyjamas
    2
  21. ​ @commenter4190 That's what he wrote, British saved them
    2
  22.  @thecouncil887  Middle Ages Italians had trade empires. But Italy is not better than France and viceversa
    2
  23. If WW3 starts and Anglos beg Italy Italy will say "not thanks" as they can't keep promises
    2
  24. ​ @justacat2 WW1 didn't switch side
    2
  25.  @SockAccount111  Exactly!
    2
  26.  @SockAccount111  Exactly
    2
  27. It didn't. Italy had ready denounced and voided the Alliance
    2
  28. NOPE. Couldn't beat anyone 1vs1 ever
    2
  29.  @sifamora13  No, it's called Isonzo and Trieste was, like Caporetto, Istria and Dalmatia, ITALIAN, slavs were rightfully kicked out. Too bad the Allies gave those territories to Slavs, but at least Italy rightfully kept Trieste
    2
  30.  @mladenbadrov7893  I can ask the same: the 'leading citizens' being wealthy landowners and merchants who's ancestors were sent by Holy Roman Empire and other Germanic kingdoms? Which revolts? Wanna talk about Trieste revolts against Austria? Istria was never Austrian or slavs, it was occupied in 1800. Before it was Venetian. Which people occupied it and brought changes? The same people You talked of Trieste as German city under HRE and Austria Italy culture is different from Roman but it has strong ties to it
    2
  31.  @mladenbadrov7893  And what was the government they protested against in 1868 and 1902? On whom did they rule? Again, just because Trieste was Austrian this make it Austrian or Slav? same for Istria, where the population was ITALIAN, since Venetian was Italian and Italians existed already, Croats and Slovens no so much. Italy existed not as a province but center of the empire, its population endured and became the Italians. meanwhile, where are Croatians and Slovens in Middle Ages? Did they consider themselves as such? Doubt it and since there was no Roman Empire anymore... You didn't explain it, I did. The fact you're moving the goalpost doesn't make it less apparent
    2
  32. When France, uk and USA cannot defeat Germany 3vs1, while Italy destroyed AH army, make me wonder why did they declare war
    2
  33.  @mynameistomfoolery5470  they did and they took lot of land. Italians arrived to North Tyrol and would have taken Vienna had they not surrendered
    2
  34.  @mynameistomfoolery5470  No, they won Trieste and Trentino. While the allied struggled against Germany.
    2
  35. ​ @ElGrandoCaymano Italy sent 5 divisions in France, 5% of Allied troops in France, while Italians won alone in WW1
    2
  36. ​ @militaryorchid7937 Italy fought AH ALONE and was winning in 1916, taking Gorizia, while the Allies couldn't defeat Germans 3vs1 and in 1918 were on their last legs in Paris.
    2
  37. ​ @zaipollizamabdulmalek5822 AH was about to be beaten in 1916, it was only thank to Germans they could wi temporarily, but Italians recovered and kicked their behinds
    2
  38.  @petrapodobnik9285  Trieste was always an Italian zone, like Istria. It's Isonzo/Soca
    2
  39. To hold out? No, they BEAT "mUrICA"
    2
  40. True, but Cadorna did manage to make something on the retreat
    2
  41. Italy was fighting to FREE the territories inhabited by Italians, slavs to keep those territories under theirs and AH foot. They failed
    2
  42. Sì. ma lo erano un po' tutti al tempo
    2
  43.  @kumadoronuma2173  Tell it to the OP
    2
  44.  @kumadoronuma2173  It's Trieste, Gorizia and Isonzo. Deal with THAT! 🧐😎
    2
  45. Italy won WW1 ALONE???
    2
  46.  @MustafaHelmy87  Arabs shouldn't talk about fighting, you are pathetic at it
    2
  47. When we want to laugh, we read one of the shortest book of the world: Norwegian battle prowess. The other is Nordic accomplishments in Civilizations
    2
  48. Generals in WW1 weren't compassioante, were they?
    2
  49.  @visevnik  And? It's Isonzo, like it's Trieste and Gorizia
    2
  50.  @visevnik  No, ISONZO, TRIESTE, GORIZIA, POLA, CAPODISTRIA, CAPORETTO ETC...
    2