Comments by "No Name" (@NoName-hg6cc) on "Italian Insanity: 12 Battles of the Isonzo | Animated History" video.

  1.  @joeywheelerii9136  France and uk crushed nobody. Italy was the only one to crush its enemy, uk and France couldn't win 3vs1
    29
  2.  @someguy7723  That's why Italians were pissed, as the only ones who defeated their enemy...
    28
  3.  @anonb315  Italy was quite strong and win the majority of the battles. Entente and the Alliance did the sane in the Western and Eastern front with pathetic results. Italy won alone, France and English had few troops, Italy sent an army in France and still they couldn't win! Nor could Germans against Russia
    27
  4.  @anonb315  I wonder. Italians were always on attack, Entente on defense. And after spring 1918 both English and French run away backwards like the chicken they are, waiting for Americans and still couldn't finish the job, while Italy destroyed AH!
    25
  5.  @anonb315  Without Italy Entente might have lost
    22
  6. "Poor predictable Entente, they probably launch another frontal attack in the no man land" "Frontal assault in no man land, never fails!" Or "Poor predictable 'murica, he is probably launch another search and destroy mission through the jungle" "search and destroy mission through the jungle, never fails!"
    9
  7. Same for Germany and France/uk, fighting over 100 battles in the same places
    6
  8.  @Oligarch-qz4ud  Except Italy did. Alone
    6
  9.  @Oligarch-qz4ud  Italy did. Deal with it
    6
  10. Bulls...
    5
  11. Italy didn't betray anyone and WON
    5
  12. It's actually Austrians stupidity. if they accepted Italy requests....
    5
  13. Italy defeated AH
    5
  14. Italians actually finished with taking Innsbruck, only one among the allies to touch enemy's territory. Then allies betrays her and Italy turn fascist. The Allies response: surprised pikachu face
    5
  15. ​ @Seft2_ Nope. Italy saved French, English and Americans on Western Front. Much like Germany saved Austrians in 1917
    5
  16. No, many of those areas are Italians so the right name is Isonzo
    5
  17. Italy didn't change side and won alone With Germany you win battles but lose war 😂
    5
  18. And Italians, Croatians, Austrians.....etc.
    5
  19. ​​ @kayagurcu2814 Turkey lost in both 1911-1912 and 1914-1918 😂
    4
  20.  @kayagurcu2814  Successor of Ottoman Empire. loser of bot war aforementioned
    4
  21. ​ @smal750  Nope, Italy fought alone, without Italians French and English would have lost against Germany 😂
    4
  22. ​ @MrBell-iq3sm  because krauts didn't respect the treaty
    4
  23. Except Italy defeated AH, Entente did not defeat Germany
    4
  24.  @Oligarch-qz4ud  Italy did alone. So thanks to no one but Italy
    4
  25.  @reverendnon5959  I heard it about Russians army. Another joke is that the only army Russia army could beat it's itself
    4
  26. You are not a 🤡 you are the whole 🎪
    4
  27. Well said!
    4
  28. Italians hero tried freed their brothers and succeeded
    4
  29. LOL, Churchill should have sit out of the war seeing how incompetent he was, Gallipoli was a mess
    4
  30. They were always Italians. It's Isonzo, Pola, Fiume, TRIESTE. But being nice some areas can use both It wouldn't be fair for the victims otherwise, as you said
    4
  31. No, ignorance is where opinion come from
    4
  32. You mean English, French and Germans sucked in both WW2. And the wars before They were always pathetic fighting. USA is not better: WW2 was won because of USSR mostly. Though Russia sucked in WW1
    4
  33. ISONZO, TRENTO, TRIESTE
    4
  34. Italians tried to free their territories, they were fed up with mistreatment and everyone saw how far slavs can go despite cities being 99% Italian
    3
  35. ​ @lecraftedeaaradhyakashyap4442 Except it wasn't It was still strong and did beat Serbia, held Russia... The "sUPerPoWer" had no contact with colonies and was surrounded, facing three armies. Italy was alone
    3
  36.  @jokekopter2509  Italy did destroy AH at Vittorio Veneto, it was already winning in 1916, the only reason Caporetto happened was because of the Germans. AH didn't win a battle against Italians
    3
  37.  @jokekopter2509  LOL no, Germans fought against Russians, French and Greeks against Bulgaria The only thing AH did that war was losing EVERY battle to Italy, even after Russia was virtually out of the war in 1916, when they'd have lost had not been for Germans.
    3
  38.  @jokekopter2509  False. Italians were the majority in Istria and Dalmatia: the cities of FIUME, POLA, ZARA etc...were Italian
    3
  39.  @jokekopter2509  Italy had a pact with the allies but croats illegally took the former AH navy and the illegaly occupied Dalmazia, which had an ITALIAN majority
    3
  40.  @jokekopter2509  Yes, Germans were there, open a book. That's the only reason AH didn't collapse after Gorizia. Without them, there's be no Caporetto. Cope and open a book. STUDY History
    3
  41.  @jokekopter2509  Yes they were, all Istria and Dalmazia were, from coast to the countryside, populated mostly by Italians
    3
  42. Not really. Italy beat AH. But Germany did make seem Russians competent as much as Entente made Germans seem good
    3
  43. Like it's strange the Allies never thought to cross the North sea to Poland so to help Russians and outflank Germans...instead of losing so many men
    3
  44. Meh, Haig, Conrad, Nivelle give him a run for his money
    3
  45. ​ @revbladez5773  But in the Somme there were English soldiers
    3
  46. Surely not. And surely not to those who run fast(English), who surrender fast(French) or those who lost to people in pajamas with blowguns
    3
  47. Trieste, Gorizia, Caporetto, Istria e Dalmazia, né Slovenia né Croazia
    3
  48.  @daigakunobaku273  Dude, the territories Italy wanted were Italian, try STUDY from the History books
    3
  49. Slavs tried to delete Italian History and culture under Austria and Yugoslavia. You keep saying TRST and Gorica instead of Trieste and Gorizia
    3
  50. uk has joined the war: they are already retreating France has joined the war; they are already surrendering Germany has joined the war: they are already losing The slavs joined the war;AHAHAHAHAA USA joined the war:they are already lost despite claiming victory
    3
  51. It's Isonzo. Like Trieste, Istria, Capo d'Istria, Pola, Caporetto...
    3
  52. Not as much as fighting over the same line in the Western Front Seriously, how come no one shot Haig or Joffre ?
    3
  53. Italians almost reached Vienna 😂
    3
  54. You mean the Triple Alliance? Well, Marna wouldn't probably have happened, since French couldn't have moved its men on the Alps
    2
  55. ​ @SockAccount111 Except English and French agreed to take what they wanted and left Italy nothing
    2
  56.  @SockAccount111  I was agreeing with you. The only reason they got anything it's because they din't respect the Treaty
    2
  57. You say so but you are wrong There were pro war manifestations
    2
  58. Well, it was everyone tactics in WW1
    2
  59. I don't know, there is one where the rest of the Entente doesn't?
    2
  60. Much like the West Front
    2
  61. Poor hamburger, your nation didn't do anything worthwhile in the military like any other field!😂
    2
  62. Because it's Italian. Like Istria. And coastal Dalmatia
    2
  63. It's Isonzo. Like Triestre, Istria with its cities of Pola, Fiume etc...
    2
  64. Italy defeated Austria with less men
    2
  65. Freeing Trento and Trieste and Istria
    2
  66. Imagine being France, Russia and uk, seeing one of the most prosperous era in mankind bit starting a bloody war over a piece of territory and because you don't want the German guy to prosper
    2
  67. You're wrong
    2
  68. The Entente did the same though and 3vs1 couldn't defeat the German army. Italy at least managed to win against AH ps: Italy was already winning in 1916 and won the majority of those battles
    2
  69. N, it's: England run away, USA fight war and lose against people in black pajamas, Russians collapse 🤣
    2
  70. Someone should have told English and French
    2
  71. Italy was winning in 1916 though
    2
  72.  @HREguy  No, Italians better defensive strategy and bravery saved Italy
    2
  73.  @nick0875  Nope, Italians defeated AH after a great struggle and after Serbia and Russia were beaten or retired. Germany couldn't defeat Russia 3 vs1 and the allies achieved a "victory" against Germans in the sense they surrendered, not that they were beaten( again, 3vs1)
    2
  74.  @Oda__Nobunaga  Ahahahaa no, he should have studied the art of war, like you should be studying History of eating sand, but alas
    2
  75.  @ninostekar5183  We have street named after the criminal butcher Tito
    2
  76. Or the battles on the Western Front
    2
  77. True, but all generals were like this "The nation must be taught to bear losses. No amount of skill on the part of the higher commanders, no training, however good, on the part of the officers and men, no superiority of arms and ammunition, however great, will enable victories to be won without the sacrifice of men’s lives. The nation must be prepared to see heavy casualty lists" "At the present time I think our action should take the form of 1. Winter ‘sports’ or raids continued into the Spring. 2. Wearing out fight similar to 1 but on a larger scale at many points along the whole front. " Do you know who said this?
    2
  78. Who's to say? The Entente may have won anyway, lost or be forced to come to a compromise.
    2
  79. Lo è stata. Si fosse schierata con la Triplice Alleanza la Francia sarebbe crollata It was. Had Italy sided with The Triple Alliance, France would have fallen
    2
  80. If WW3 starts and Anglos beg Italy Italy will say "not thanks" as they can't keep promises
    2
  81. ​ @justacat2 WW1 didn't switch side
    2
  82.  @SockAccount111  Exactly!
    2
  83.  @SockAccount111  Exactly
    2
  84.  @sifamora13  No, it's called Isonzo and Trieste was, like Caporetto, Istria and Dalmatia, ITALIAN, slavs were rightfully kicked out. Too bad the Allies gave those territories to Slavs, but at least Italy rightfully kept Trieste
    2
  85.  @mladenbadrov7893  I can ask the same: the 'leading citizens' being wealthy landowners and merchants who's ancestors were sent by Holy Roman Empire and other Germanic kingdoms? Which revolts? Wanna talk about Trieste revolts against Austria? Istria was never Austrian or slavs, it was occupied in 1800. Before it was Venetian. Which people occupied it and brought changes? The same people You talked of Trieste as German city under HRE and Austria Italy culture is different from Roman but it has strong ties to it
    2
  86.  @mladenbadrov7893  And what was the government they protested against in 1868 and 1902? On whom did they rule? Again, just because Trieste was Austrian this make it Austrian or Slav? same for Istria, where the population was ITALIAN, since Venetian was Italian and Italians existed already, Croats and Slovens no so much. Italy existed not as a province but center of the empire, its population endured and became the Italians. meanwhile, where are Croatians and Slovens in Middle Ages? Did they consider themselves as such? Doubt it and since there was no Roman Empire anymore... You didn't explain it, I did. The fact you're moving the goalpost doesn't make it less apparent
    2
  87.  @petrapodobnik9285  Trieste was always an Italian zone, like Istria. It's Isonzo/Soca
    2
  88. True, but Cadorna did manage to make something on the retreat
    2
  89. Italy was fighting to FREE the territories inhabited by Italians, slavs to keep those territories under theirs and AH foot. They failed
    2
  90. Sì. ma lo erano un po' tutti al tempo
    2
  91.  @kumadoronuma2173  Tell it to the OP
    2
  92.  @kumadoronuma2173  It's Trieste, Gorizia and Isonzo. Deal with THAT! 🧐😎
    2
  93. Italy won WW1 ALONE???
    2
  94. When we want to laugh, we read one of the shortest book of the world: Norwegian battle prowess. The other is Nordic accomplishments in Civilizations
    2
  95. Generals in WW1 weren't compassioante, were they?
    2
  96.  @visevnik  And? It's Isonzo, like it's Trieste and Gorizia
    2
  97.  @visevnik  No, ISONZO, TRIESTE, GORIZIA, POLA, CAPODISTRIA, CAPORETTO ETC...
    2
  98.  @visevnik  Poor slav, you cannot even translate properly the REAL name of Italian name. Try a vocabulary
    2
  99.  @visevnik  It seems that you cannot do anything but copying others people comment. You should know pan-slavic nationalism and xenophobia is prohibited in EU. i'm sure IT IS written in Wikipedia, so read more carefully next time
    2
  100.  @visevnik  ps: I didn't write anything antisemitic
    2
  101.  @sebastjankoracin7774  LOL no, Slavs needed help to win. In WW1 Italian beat Slavs and if it wasn't for them it would've gotten all of Dalmatia, as it was promised
    2
  102. @sebastjankoracin7774  The Germans arrived and beat the Italians yes. Have you ever heard of Vittorio Veneto, where Italians beat the Kraut-Slavs, the AH army?
    2
  103. Italy in WW1 didn't do that bad and defeated AH. I wonder, where did French, English, American and Austro-German ineptitude comes from?
    2
  104. The only reason Entente idn't get rolled out was because of luck and the fact they were 3vs1. Same with Germans on the East, added with the fact Russians were incompetent
    2
  105. Source?
    2
  106. "Just one more battle of the Somme dudes, trust me
    2
  107. What? What's fascist in WW1?
    1
  108.  @poremechen  Italian majority lived there since before year 0. Yes, some slavs appeared in 600 AD and lived there, but they were a minority
    1
  109.  @poremechen  No no, you were with all of the slavs drinking vodka. You must be one of those child indoctrinated by propaganda
    1
  110.  @argonaut1462  What are you talking about? Those regions were inhabited by Illyrians, not Celts. Illyrians who then got absorbed by Italians' ancestors, the Romans
    1
  111.  @argonaut1462  Actually, Histri were considered Illyrians or close related
    1
  112. no, Italians attack their treacherous "ally" who never respected the pact, while signing another with equally treacherous ones, maybe with even less dignity. Then they won the war by destroying their enemy while Entente couldn't win 3vs1, against an enemy who couldn't defeat the inept Russians 3 vs 1
    1
  113. ​ @l.or.e7621 they gave the scraps and kept the colonies for themselves. But Anglo-French propaganda can always work to embellish a treachery
    1
  114.  @jokekopter2509  All won except Caporetto, lost to the GERMANS Stop fabricating History 😉
    1
  115. English and French would be running away or give up. Italy won
    1
  116. Italy fought against AH on Isonzo and Balkans, defeating them, Entente couldn't defeat 3vs1 Germany and dared not to respect the treaty they signed, like the bunch of inept coward they are
    1
  117. Winning by defeating the enemy while Entente couldn't 3 vs 1?
    1
  118. I love how France is so inept they lost to both African and Asians
    1
  119. And poison wasn't? Beside, show me where it's said dum dum were illegal
    1
  120.  @windogendoors7566  Numerical and logistic? LOL no
    1
  121.  @windogendoors7566  In 1915 maybe. Not in second half of 1916
    1
  122. ​ @bryant7542 Better strategies? So they could be killed on the sea by the Austrian navy or on the beaches, Gallipoli style? LMAO
    1
  123.  @madkoala2130  Except I don't...not everybody is like you 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Yes, after almost pushing AH to the brink. They survived because of Germans. Do you know what happened after? Italy won, beating AH alone and taking Istria and Isonzo something Allies couldn't do with Germans. Slavs of course cannot accept it, like they cannot accept they needed to be liberated in WW2
    1
  124. Exactly!
    1
  125. Every battle of the Western front: the allies launch another senseless frontal assault!
    1
  126. Isonzo Gorizia Trieste Istria Capo d'Istria Fiume
    1
  127. Exactly, especially the last point
    1
  128. YIKES
    1
  129. Bullshit?
    1
  130.  @rizzochuenringe669  He didn't meant against Italy, but against Serbia, though AH thought of attacking in 1908, but in the end didn't. The border of Italy was, after all, one of the most secured, since Italy RIGHTFULLY didn't trust AH at all and AH answered by securing the border as well
    1
  131.  @rizzochuenringe669  "Italy hated AH" LOL, hate? Even if it was true, it was justified! AH had Italians territories, where only Italianslived, and tried to delete Italian langand culture! Not to mention it had other pieces of Italy fifty years before! That's why Italians declared war, to free those territories before Slavs and Germanic people deleted all Italians culture. And Italy succeeded, until WW2 when the Slavs whined with the Russian and Italy was forced to give them part of its territory. But at least it kept Trieste and Trentino Alto Adige
    1
  132.  @rizzochuenringe669  Italians wanted land that had ancien italian cultures and people of Italian heritage who lived there for a millennia: Istria, Dalmatia, Trentino Alto Adige
    1
  133.  @rizzochuenringe669  Many of those were ancestors of Italians,, Slavs never appeared until 600 AD, and some areas still had a majority of Italians since Middle Ages. Same for Alto Adige, inhabited by people of Latin origin until the Germanic people arrived
    1
  134.  @rizzochuenringe669  AHAHAHA yes there were, it was part of the center of Empire. North had Etruscan and Greeks. Besides, you said yourself: ARRIVED. There were not Germanic people, like there were no Slavs, they invaded.
    1
  135.  @rizzochuenringe669  AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA Italians were there already, Slavs and Germanic were not (Italy existed since early Middle Ages and, as I said, there were their ancestors)
    1
  136. Joffre, Haig, Nivelle, Churchill were so good.... For the Alliance 😂
    1
  137. Italy was winning in 1916 though
    1
  138. More like such a war wouldn't be convenient, since AH was not an ally either and could exploit it Also, Ah never respected the treaty
    1
  139. @mttokrnk So many inaccuracies
    1
  140. Both were meh. French had a better general
    1
  141. Italians won this fight alone
    1
  142.  @HREguy  The only thing that saved Germany from invasion from South was surrendering
    1
  143.  @kumadoronuma2173  It won't but you can start moving anyway. Back to where you belong
    1
  144.  @kumadoronuma2173  You are either a bad spot for Slavic people and culture or represent the typical characteristics of your people and in this case, go back to the steppe
    1
  145. Yes, sum up Western front perfectly
    1
  146.  @Seft2_  LOL yes, facts 😉
    1
  147. War is hell
    1
  148.  @beetlebg3759  Well yeah, Portugal was far removed, as example
    1
  149.  @Staniele  Ask anone near Isonzo. They will tell you they don't know what Soca is.
    1
  150. And Italians would have break through, had Germans not intervened
    1
  151. Tell that to the Entente or the Triple Alliance 😂😂😂
    1
  152.  @Harahvaiti  It has more sense than what you and the op put together
    1
  153. Ahahahahaha no, AH was losing and "won" only thanks to Germany, ultimately losing to Italy on Piave
    1
  154. Italy DOES exist
    1
  155. @Insert Name If Italy surrendered at that point The Alliance could still win the war
    1
  156. If Italy declared war on Entente there would have not been any Marna Miracle. if they did smash through France and take Paris in 1918 they might have won
    1
  157.  @mladenbadrov7893  It's called Isonzo. Slavs talk like they have or always had the majority of Croats, Slovens etc....(and we could argue how valid it is giving the nations slavs divided themselves to didn't exist) on Venetian, an ITALIAN REPUBLICAN STATE, territory(which was CONQUERED by AH), so they could have the majority in the countryside, while ignoring that despite the massive immigration they never managed a majority in the cities, that formed, by 1700/1800, the majority of the populations in those regions
    1
  158.  @mladenbadrov7893  AHAHAHAHHA since when was Trieste GERMAN? Venice was ALWAYS Italian, by culture. LOL, and from whom did Germans conquer Trieste from? Sure we can say from whom Venetians took their territories: the Latinized population that mostly welcomed them. immigration was from Slavs side, Latins were there way before Slavs and Istria was Venetian since 900 AD
    1
  159.  @mladenbadrov7893  The leading citiziens of Istria in 1800 tried to rebel against Austria. Why? Because they felt Italians. They felt the ties with Italy and Venice, who treated them well. Trieste was Venetian before being Germanic Oh yeah? And what are the ties between Germanics people of old and Germanic people, Austro-Germans, today? They are not the same people. Nor are Slavs descendants of Illiryans, the Albanian do like Italians descend from Romans
    1
  160.  @mladenbadrov7893  Maybe just the people sick of being under German/Slavs foot? See the manifestations of 1868 and the martial law of 1902. i didn't find anything to back up your claim, give me something Istria is Venetian since 900 AD, Slavs were in Dalmatia maybe and it was part of Italy even under Charles Magne and Lombard. Trieste was Latin since the time of the Roman Empire. WTF are YOU talking about? Istria coast is inhabited by Italians since 800 AD and they are the same since then. Italy culture has still Latin roots. Meanwhile, people in the old Retia weren't always the same Germanic people there are today. The fact Trieste was German owned doesn't make it a German city more than it makes Paris, or Bruxelles German just because they owned it
    1
  161.  @mladenbadrov7893  There were no manifestation or new Republic founded tied to Slav or German identity, they were antifascist manifestation without any strong slav or Germanic national identity As i mention, those lands were Venetian since 900 AD and populated by Italians before that. LOL, where is Croatian and Slovene state in 6th/7th century? Trieste was Latin and then Italian, like Istria, it just signed a pact with HRE in the 13th century, nothing more, Byzantium had no legitimate claim, no more than HRE did. Your last two comments (at least) is basically admitting Trieste and Friuli Venezia Giulia is nor Slavs nor German
    1
  162. Maybe any of you two can pull some numbers and we can see...?
    1
  163. uk ones had a phone to desperately call the retreat France had a white flag incorporated. Russian simply fought barehanded or hid USA just showed up to plant a flag, declare victory and run away
    1
  164. Ed Armando Diaz
    1
  165. @youtubemovielover2961 Italy won alone
    1
  166. Well said
    1
  167. ​ @FlagAnthem  No more than others front. But those are considered "brilliant tactics"
    1
  168.  @friedrichhegel9854  Serbia had agree to every term. Ah aggression was unjustified
    1
  169. @ Facts
    1
  170. @ They did. And were attacked. But they won
    1
  171. uk? france? USA? Germany? All of them were pretty useless The slavs were just pathetic
    1
  172. Not all of it and since Fascism was caused by English, French and American inability to respect a treaty....
    1
  173. You mean Germany, uk, France, USA....
    1
  174.  @kumadoronuma2173  I figured you were biased, I am Italian and I use the rightful name: ISONZO, TRIEST, ISTRIA, CAPODISTRIA, POLA. Seem like you wish to relieve the good old days of AH or Tito, committing genocides on the Italians. Italy won in WW1, regaining part of its sacred soil, sadly partially lost in WW2, under foreign occupation for a century Slovens and Croats have way too many right, right Italians didn't have and I bet still don't have.
    1
  175.  @kumadoronuma2173  Sorry pal, but it's not pre 1918 or Tito Yugoslavia. You have to accept that
    1
  176.  @kumadoronuma2173  AHAHAHAHHA you got your behind handed to you both world WWs by us, we took Trieste and Gorizia but sadly lost the rest to the American and Russia You are a disgraceful, deluded titoist 🤣
    1
  177.  @Staniele  Those were, are and will always be ITALIAN, tito whining fanboys. Cope and seethe
    1
  178.  @Reignor99  At your 20s you still considered war something beautiful??
    1
  179. Trieste, Caporetto, Istria e Dalmazia, né Slovenia né Croazia!
    1
  180. Trieste, Caporetto, Istria e Dalmazia, né Slovenia né Croazia!
    1
  181.  @Staniele  Italians are Romans's descendants and those lands were Romans and Italians, never Slavonia
    1
  182. That's probably the best comment I've read here 😆
    1
  183. Italy won the majority of battles, among which the last (Vittorio Veneto)
    1
  184. USA have no place in putting anyone in place, having no respect for any treaty and being almost irrelevant in WW1 Italy should have got what it was promised, as USA, uk and France did.
    1
  185.  @FlagAnthem  Ahahahahahaha blockade? There couldn't have been if France collapsed in 1914
    1
  186.  @drazenbicanic3590  Italy defeated them on the field. Also, Italians suffered ethnic cleanses under AH
    1