Comments by "No Name" (@NoName-hg6cc) on "Why did Italy 'Betray' the German Empire? | Animated History" video.
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LuisAldamiz For the same reasons the Entente powers didn't give Italy what promised: weakened a possible threat. After all they didn't in 1908, and the Treaty explicitly said they should have
Controlling Egypt, Malta, Tunisia...meant controlling the Mediterranean. You think Austria would have wanted it?
LOL, Italy was winning until 1916 with Austria. The Mountain are mountain, same everywhere and I don't think French were prepared to fight on them, giving they and the rest of the Entente was quite pathetic, so much that only a diversion of German troops saved Paris, who could be defended by troops drawn from the Alpine front. Not if Italy entered though
On maritime front, with Italy, Turkey, AH on the same side, (France would be out of the war one Paris fell, colonies wouldn't just obey a defeated country) controlling the Mediterranean could've been difficult and any attempt to invade any of those countries would end hilariously bad as it did in Gallipoli. Not to mention, nor France nor uk navy did much in that war.
Worth to mention that had Italy not destroyed AH war could have gone on a little more and Entente was as tired as the Central powers
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LucioFercho Ahahahahahaha here it is again the spigotto, refusing to say where it's from like the coward it is.
Ahahahah that article don't exist, this does
"Art. 7. L'Austria-Ungheria e l'Italia, non mirando che al mantenimento, in quanto possibile, dello status quo territoriale in Oriente, si impegnano a usare la loro influenza per prevenire qualunque modificazione territoriale che potesse portare danno all'una o all'altra delle Potenze firmatarie del presente Trattato. Esse si comunicheranno a tale scopo tutte le informazioni suscettibili di illuminarle mutuamente sulle loro proprie disposizioni come su quelle di altre Potenze. In ogni modo, nel caso che, in forza di avvenimenti, il mantenimento dello statu quo nelle regioni dei Balcani o delle coste ed isole ottomane nell'Adriatico e nel Mar Egeo divenisse impossibile e che, sia in conseguenza dell'azione di una terza Potenza, sia altrimenti, l'Austria-Ungheria o l'Italia si vedessero nella necessità di modificarlo con un'occupazione temporanea o permanente da parte loro, quest'occupazione non avrà luogo che dopo un preventivo accordo fra le due Potenze, fondato sul principio di un compenso reciproco per qualunque vantaggio territoriale o d'altra natura che ciascuna di esse ottenesse in più dello statu quo attuale, e che dia soddisfazione agli interessi e alle pretese ben fondati delle Parti."
In English:
"However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties."
Of course the krauts, being the unreliable, treacherous people they always were, did not comply. Austria even signed a treaty with Russia in 1904!
But a spigotto will certainly not be able to understand it, not having any History or a achievement on your own 😂🤣
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LucioFercho LMAO! Again spigotto, the article between Austria and Russia break Triple Alliance
""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary."
Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties."
Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂
1
-
@LucioFercho Ahahahahahaha again bean eater, as I said you should have any difficulties to point them out. Why don't you? Maybe because they are as biased as you 🤣
Only a krait and a spigotto can try to justify AH with Serbia alleged terrorism...😂
"There were many potential enemies on Conrad’s horizon, but Serbia became his chief
preoccupation. In a memorandum composed at the end of 1907 he called for the invasion and
annexation of Serbia, which he described as ‘a constant breeding ground for those aspirations and
machinations that aim at the separation of the South Slav areas [of the Empire]’.
During 1908–9,
when the annexation crisis was at its height, he called repeatedly for preventive war against
Belgrade. ‘It is a crime,’ he told Gina von Reininghaus in the spring of 1909, ‘that nothing is being
done. War against Serbia could have saved the monarchy. In a few years we shall atone bitterly for
this omission, and I shall be chosen to bear the entire responsibility and drain the chalice to its
dregs.’
117 He called for war against Serbia again during the Balkan War crisis of 1912–13. During
the twelve months between 1 January 1913 and 1 January 1914, he counselled a Serbian war no
fewer than twenty-five times."
Understood, grease?
1
-
@LucioFercho Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality:
""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary."
Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties."
Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂
1
-
1
-
Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality:
""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary."
Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties."
Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂
(Second time you forced me to do this)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LucioFercho Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality:
""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary."
Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties."
Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂
( Sixth time!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️)
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LucioFercho Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality:
""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary."
Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties."
Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂
( Seventh time!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️)
1
-
1
-
@LucioFercho Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality:
""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary."
Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties."
Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂
( Eigth time!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️)
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LucioFercho I though I told you to not force me to HUMILIATE you, I want to educate you, you are forcing me to utterly destroy you 😂🤣😉Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality:
""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary."
Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties."
Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂
( NINTH time!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️)
And of course, AH treatment of Serbia:"There were many potential enemies on Conrad’s horizon, but Serbia became his chief
preoccupation. In a memorandum composed at the end of 1907 he called for the invasion and
annexation of Serbia, (...)
During 1908–9,
when the annexation crisis was at its height, he called repeatedly for preventive war against
Belgrade. ‘It is a crime,’ he told Gina von Reininghaus in the spring of 1909, ‘that nothing is being
done. War against Serbia could have saved the monarchy. In a few years we shall atone bitterly for
this omission, and I shall be chosen to bear the entire responsibility and drain the chalice to its
dregs.’
He called for war against Serbia again during the Balkan War crisis of 1912–13. During
the twelve months between 1 January 1913 and 1 January 1914, he counselled a Serbian war no
fewer than twenty-five times."
Keep making a fool of yourself spigotto 😉
1
-
@LucioFercho I though I told you to not force me to HUMILIATE you, I want to educate you, you are forcing me to utterly destroy you 😂🤣😉Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality:
""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary."
Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties."
Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂
( TWELFTH time!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️)
And of course, AH treatment of Serbia:"There were many potential enemies on Conrad’s horizon, but Serbia became his chief
preoccupation. In a memorandum composed at the end of 1907 he called for the invasion and
annexation of Serbia, (...)
During 1908–9,
when the annexation crisis was at its height, he called repeatedly for preventive war against
Belgrade. ‘It is a crime,’ he told Gina von Reininghaus in the spring of 1909, ‘that nothing is being
done. War against Serbia could have saved the monarchy. In a few years we shall atone bitterly for
this omission, and I shall be chosen to bear the entire responsibility and drain the chalice to its
dregs.’
He called for war against Serbia again during the Balkan War crisis of 1912–13. During
the twelve months between 1 January 1913 and 1 January 1914, he counselled a Serbian war no
fewer than twenty-five times."
Keep making a fool of yourself spigotto 😉
1
-
@LucioFercho I though I told you to not force me to HUMILIATE you, I want to educate you, you are forcing me to utterly destroy you 😂🤣😉Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality:
""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary."
Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties."
Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂
( THIRTEENTH TIME!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️)
And of course, AH treatment of Serbia:"There were many potential enemies on Conrad’s horizon, but Serbia became his chief
preoccupation. In a memorandum composed at the end of 1907 he called for the invasion and
annexation of Serbia, (...)
During 1908–9,
when the annexation crisis was at its height, he called repeatedly for preventive war against
Belgrade. ‘It is a crime,’ he told Gina von Reininghaus in the spring of 1909, ‘that nothing is being
done. War against Serbia could have saved the monarchy. In a few years we shall atone bitterly for
this omission, and I shall be chosen to bear the entire responsibility and drain the chalice to its
dregs.’
He called for war against Serbia again during the Balkan War crisis of 1912–13. During
the twelve months between 1 January 1913 and 1 January 1914, he counselled a Serbian war no
fewer than twenty-five times."
Keep making a fool of yourself spigotto 😉
1
-
@LucioFercho I though I told you to not force me to HUMILIATE you, I want to educate you, you are forcing me to utterly destroy you 😂🤣😉Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality:
""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary."
Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties."
Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂
( FOURTEENTH TTIME!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️)
And of course, AH treatment of Serbia:"There were many potential enemies on Conrad’s horizon, but Serbia became his chief
preoccupation. In a memorandum composed at the end of 1907 he called for the invasion and
annexation of Serbia, (...)
During 1908–9,
when the annexation crisis was at its height, he called repeatedly for preventive war against
Belgrade. ‘It is a crime,’ he told Gina von Reininghaus in the spring of 1909, ‘that nothing is being
done. War against Serbia could have saved the monarchy. In a few years we shall atone bitterly for
this omission, and I shall be chosen to bear the entire responsibility and drain the chalice to its
dregs.’
He called for war against Serbia again during the Balkan War crisis of 1912–13. During
the twelve months between 1 January 1913 and 1 January 1914, he counselled a Serbian war no
fewer than twenty-five times."
Keep making a fool of yourself spigotto 😉
1
-
@LucioFercho I though I told you to not force me to HUMILIATE you, I want to educate you, you are forcing me to utterly destroy you 😂🤣😉Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality:
""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary."
Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties."
Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂
( FIFTEENTH time!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️)
And of course, AH treatment of Serbia:"There were many potential enemies on Conrad’s horizon, but Serbia became his chief
preoccupation. In a memorandum composed at the end of 1907 he called for the invasion and
annexation of Serbia, (...)
During 1908–9,
when the annexation crisis was at its height, he called repeatedly for preventive war against
Belgrade. ‘It is a crime,’ he told Gina von Reininghaus in the spring of 1909, ‘that nothing is being
done. War against Serbia could have saved the monarchy. In a few years we shall atone bitterly for
this omission, and I shall be chosen to bear the entire responsibility and drain the chalice to its
dregs.’
He called for war against Serbia again during the Balkan War crisis of 1912–13. During
the twelve months between 1 January 1913 and 1 January 1914, he counselled a Serbian war no
fewer than twenty-five times."
Keep making a fool of yourself spigotto 😉
1
-
@LucioFercho I though I told you to not force me to HUMILIATE you, I want to educate you, you are forcing me to utterly destroy you 😂🤣😉Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality:
""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary."
Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties."
Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂
( SIXTEENTH time!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️)
And of course, AH treatment of Serbia:"There were many potential enemies on Conrad’s horizon, but Serbia became his chief
preoccupation. In a memorandum composed at the end of 1907 he called for the invasion and
annexation of Serbia, (...)
During 1908–9,
when the annexation crisis was at its height, he called repeatedly for preventive war against
Belgrade. ‘It is a crime,’ he told Gina von Reininghaus in the spring of 1909, ‘that nothing is being
done. War against Serbia could have saved the monarchy. In a few years we shall atone bitterly for
this omission, and I shall be chosen to bear the entire responsibility and drain the chalice to its
dregs.’
He called for war against Serbia again during the Balkan War crisis of 1912–13. During
the twelve months between 1 January 1913 and 1 January 1914, he counselled a Serbian war no
fewer than twenty-five times."
Keep making a fool of yourself spigotto 😉
1
-
@LucioFercho I though I told you to not force me to HUMILIATE you, I want to educate you, you are forcing me to utterly destroy you 😂🤣😉Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality:
""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary."
Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties."
Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂
( SEVENTHEETH time!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️)
And of course, AH treatment of Serbia:"There were many potential enemies on Conrad’s horizon, but Serbia became his chief
preoccupation. In a memorandum composed at the end of 1907 he called for the invasion and
annexation of Serbia, (...)
During 1908–9,
when the annexation crisis was at its height, he called repeatedly for preventive war against
Belgrade. ‘It is a crime,’ he told Gina von Reininghaus in the spring of 1909, ‘that nothing is being
done. War against Serbia could have saved the monarchy. In a few years we shall atone bitterly for
this omission, and I shall be chosen to bear the entire responsibility and drain the chalice to its
dregs.’
He called for war against Serbia again during the Balkan War crisis of 1912–13. During
the twelve months between 1 January 1913 and 1 January 1914, he counselled a Serbian war no
fewer than twenty-five times."
Keep making a fool of yourself spigotto 😉
1
-
@LucioFercho I though I told you to not force me to HUMILIATE you, I want to educate you, you are forcing me to utterly destroy you 😂🤣😉Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality:
""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary."
Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties."
Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂
( EIGHTEENTH time!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️)
And of course, AH treatment of Serbia:"There were many potential enemies on Conrad’s horizon, but Serbia became his chief
preoccupation. In a memorandum composed at the end of 1907 he called for the invasion and
annexation of Serbia, (...)
During 1908–9,
when the annexation crisis was at its height, he called repeatedly for preventive war against
Belgrade. ‘It is a crime,’ he told Gina von Reininghaus in the spring of 1909, ‘that nothing is being
done. War against Serbia could have saved the monarchy. In a few years we shall atone bitterly for
this omission, and I shall be chosen to bear the entire responsibility and drain the chalice to its
dregs.’
He called for war against Serbia again during the Balkan War crisis of 1912–13. During
the twelve months between 1 January 1913 and 1 January 1914, he counselled a Serbian war no
fewer than twenty-five times."
Keep making a fool of yourself spigotto 😉
1
-
@LucioFercho I though I told you to not force me to HUMILIATE you, I want to educate you, you are forcing me to utterly destroy you 😂🤣😉Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality:
""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary."
Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties."
Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂
( NINETEENTH time!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️)
And of course, AH treatment of Serbia:"There were many potential enemies on Conrad’s horizon, but Serbia became his chief
preoccupation. In a memorandum composed at the end of 1907 he called for the invasion and
annexation of Serbia, (...)
During 1908–9,
when the annexation crisis was at its height, he called repeatedly for preventive war against
Belgrade. ‘It is a crime,’ he told Gina von Reininghaus in the spring of 1909, ‘that nothing is being
done. War against Serbia could have saved the monarchy. In a few years we shall atone bitterly for
this omission, and I shall be chosen to bear the entire responsibility and drain the chalice to its
dregs.’
He called for war against Serbia again during the Balkan War crisis of 1912–13. During
the twelve months between 1 January 1913 and 1 January 1914, he counselled a Serbian war no
fewer than twenty-five times."
Keep making a fool of yourself spigotto 😉
1
-
@LucioFercho I though I told you to not force me to HUMILIATE you, I want to educate you, you are forcing me to utterly destroy you 😂🤣😉Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality:
""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary."
Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties."
Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂
( TWENTIETH time!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️)
And of course, AH treatment of Serbia:"There were many potential enemies on Conrad’s horizon, but Serbia became his chief
preoccupation. In a memorandum composed at the end of 1907 he called for the invasion and
annexation of Serbia, (...)
During 1908–9,
when the annexation crisis was at its height, he called repeatedly for preventive war against
Belgrade. ‘It is a crime,’ he told Gina von Reininghaus in the spring of 1909, ‘that nothing is being
done. War against Serbia could have saved the monarchy. In a few years we shall atone bitterly for
this omission, and I shall be chosen to bear the entire responsibility and drain the chalice to its
dregs.’
He called for war against Serbia again during the Balkan War crisis of 1912–13. During
the twelve months between 1 January 1913 and 1 January 1914, he counselled a Serbian war no
fewer than twenty-five times."
Keep making a fool of yourself spigotto 😉
1
-
@LucioFercho I though I told you to not force me to HUMILIATE you, I want to educate you, you are forcing me to utterly destroy you 😂🤣😉Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality: ""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary." Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties." Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂 ( TWENTY-TWO time!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️) And of course, AH treatment of Serbia:"There were many potential enemies on Conrad’s horizon, but Serbia became his chief preoccupation. In a memorandum composed at the end of 1907 he called for the invasion and annexation of Serbia, (...) During 1908–9, when the annexation crisis was at its height, he called repeatedly for preventive war against Belgrade. ‘It is a crime,’ he told Gina von Reininghaus in the spring of 1909, ‘that nothing is being done. War against Serbia could have saved the monarchy. In a few years we shall atone bitterly for this omission, and I shall be chosen to bear the entire responsibility and drain the chalice to its dregs.’ He called for war against Serbia again during the Balkan War crisis of 1912–13. During the twelve months between 1 January 1913 and 1 January 1914, he counselled a Serbian war no fewer than twenty-five times." Keep making a fool of yourself spigotto 😉
1
-
@LucioFercho I though I told you to not force me to HUMILIATE you, I want to educate you, you are forcing me to utterly destroy you 😂🤣😉Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality: ""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary." Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties." Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂 ( TWENTY-THREE time!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️) And of course, AH treatment of Serbia:"There were many potential enemies on Conrad’s horizon, but Serbia became his chief preoccupation. In a memorandum composed at the end of 1907 he called for the invasion and annexation of Serbia, (...) During 1908–9, when the annexation crisis was at its height, he called repeatedly for preventive war against Belgrade. ‘It is a crime,’ he told Gina von Reininghaus in the spring of 1909, ‘that nothing is being done. War against Serbia could have saved the monarchy. In a few years we shall atone bitterly for this omission, and I shall be chosen to bear the entire responsibility and drain the chalice to its dregs.’ He called for war against Serbia again during the Balkan War crisis of 1912–13. During the twelve months between 1 January 1913 and 1 January 1914, he counselled a Serbian war no fewer than twenty-five times." Keep making a fool of yourself spigotto 😉
1
-
@LucioFercho I though I told you to not force me to HUMILIATE you, I want to educate you, you are forcing me to utterly destroy you 😂🤣😉Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality: ""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary." Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties." Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂 ( TWENTY-FOUR time!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️) And of course, AH treatment of Serbia:"There were many potential enemies on Conrad’s horizon, but Serbia became his chief preoccupation. In a memorandum composed at the end of 1907 he called for the invasion and annexation of Serbia, (...) During 1908–9, when the annexation crisis was at its height, he called repeatedly for preventive war against Belgrade. ‘It is a crime,’ he told Gina von Reininghaus in the spring of 1909, ‘that nothing is being done. War against Serbia could have saved the monarchy. In a few years we shall atone bitterly for this omission, and I shall be chosen to bear the entire responsibility and drain the chalice to its dregs.’ He called for war against Serbia again during the Balkan War crisis of 1912–13. During the twelve months between 1 January 1913 and 1 January 1914, he counselled a Serbian war no fewer than twenty-five times." Keep making a fool of yourself spigotto 😉
1
-
@LucioFercho I though I told you to not force me to HUMILIATE you, I want to educate you, you are forcing me to utterly destroy you 😂🤣😉Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality: ""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary." Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties." Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂 ( TWENTY-FIVE time!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️) And of course, AH treatment of Serbia:"There were many potential enemies on Conrad’s horizon, but Serbia became his chief preoccupation. In a memorandum composed at the end of 1907 he called for the invasion and annexation of Serbia, (...) During 1908–9, when the annexation crisis was at its height, he called repeatedly for preventive war against Belgrade. ‘It is a crime,’ he told Gina von Reininghaus in the spring of 1909, ‘that nothing is being done. War against Serbia could have saved the monarchy. In a few years we shall atone bitterly for this omission, and I shall be chosen to bear the entire responsibility and drain the chalice to its dregs.’ He called for war against Serbia again during the Balkan War crisis of 1912–13. During the twelve months between 1 January 1913 and 1 January 1914, he counselled a Serbian war no fewer than twenty-five times." Keep making a fool of yourself spigotto 😉
1
-
@LucioFercho I though I told you to not force me to HUMILIATE you, I want to educate you, you are forcing me to utterly destroy you 😂🤣😉Ahahahahahaha it's funny to see a grease trying to ignoring History for his own convenience. Too bad Reality cannot be ignored and Kraut treachery is a reality: ""ARTICLE VII E. v. emperor of Austria, etc. and the Apostolic King of Hungary reserves the right to choose the timing and method for his troops to occupy Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was agreed that this measure, which is not an act of solidarity with the occupation of Bulgaria by Russian troops, nor in the interpretation of its government by its empire. and the king. Majesty, nor in its implementation, should not have a hostile character towards Russia. Likewise, the intervention of the Russian army in Turkey should neither in its interpretation by the Russian imperial government nor in its implementation be hostile towards Austria-Hungary." Not that Austria never respected it: " "However, if, in the course of events, the maintenance of the status quo in the regions of the Balkans or of the Ottoman coasts and islands in the Adriatic and in the Aegean Sea should become impossible, and if, whether in consequence of the action of a third Power or otherwise, Austria-Hungary or Italy should find themselves under the necessity of modifying it by a temporary or permanent occupation on their part, this occupation shall take place only after a previous agreement between the two Powers, based upon the principle of a reciprocal compensation for every advantage, territorial or other, which each of them might obtain beyond the present status quo, and giving satisfaction to the interests and well founded claims of the two Parties." Krauts are always a treacherous bunch. Not that a bean eater would understand it! 😂 ( TWENTY-SIX time!!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️) And of course, AH treatment of Serbia:"There were many potential enemies on Conrad’s horizon, but Serbia became his chief preoccupation. In a memorandum composed at the end of 1907 he called for the invasion and annexation of Serbia, (...) During 1908–9, when the annexation crisis was at its height, he called repeatedly for preventive war against Belgrade. ‘It is a crime,’ he told Gina von Reininghaus in the spring of 1909, ‘that nothing is being done. War against Serbia could have saved the monarchy. In a few years we shall atone bitterly for this omission, and I shall be chosen to bear the entire responsibility and drain the chalice to its dregs.’ He called for war against Serbia again during the Balkan War crisis of 1912–13. During the twelve months between 1 January 1913 and 1 January 1914, he counselled a Serbian war no fewer than twenty-five times." Keep making a fool of yourself spigotto 😉
1