Comments by "No Name" (@NoName-hg6cc) on "Biographics" channel.

  1. Back then Nazi Germany wasn't the epitome of evil it is today. Yes, it was bad, a dictatorship, but one of the many, still no war, no Holocaust. The title of evil of all evils was given to USSR
    23
  2. Still, bit sad that dogs pigeons and other animals, who had never to do with war, were brough to our fight, on one side or another
    16
  3. Funny thing is, smallpox was more dangerous
    7
  4. Metternich himself recognized that
    5
  5.  @dusk6159  Yeah. Like someone said above, Cavour didn't have Prussian power behind
    5
  6. Mmm...no, it's mostly because of a series of factors, among which: tiredness, numerical inferiority on some salient points etc...etc...
    4
  7.  @augustuscaesar8287  New Deal helped a lot, since investment were at a time low, so much for Smith's idea of self adjusting economy
    4
  8. Guys, don't attack him, he wanted to praise Garibaldi
    4
  9. Fouch, Joffre, Haig...
    3
  10. Nah. Italy won
    3
  11. Mori was a great man
    3
  12.  @rathinmajumder441  rooting AH army, taking a city, sending AH in such disarray they had to call Germans...yeah, it was not such a big issue. I wonder what sources tell you that....must be Austrians or English....the ones who empathize small victories without meaning like Somme
    3
  13.  @mebsrea  no, Italians fought to save Italians from Trentino and Friuli Venetia Giulia from cultural annihilation
    3
  14. Atta boy.
    3
  15. Did he told you that it was not more industrialised than the North and had an higher illiteracy?
    3
  16. As a State Italy is younger than USA, as a Nation it is centuries of years old
    3
  17.  @neutronalchemist3241  He was a socialist but despised communists. He wanted spcial reform but take from others just for the sake of it seemed wrong to him He had not an high education but he was by no means stupid
    3
  18.  @neutronalchemist3241  I don't think he knew English, not for what I read, but French, Spanish and maybe Portuguese yes You are right, he was educated, but I think his education wouldn't go as far as a high school, but only because he started working young, and he was not stupid, as I said, just didn't have high class ( high bourgeois or noble) education but he had less scruples to say what he think and was less hypocrite
    3
  19. And no, Cavour aim was unifying Italy, not just extend territory
    3
  20. They were both horrible ideologies
    3
  21.  @xxviiiottobre  No, Italy was fascist as it has fascist government but those who fought fought for Italy and the king, not Mussolini
    3
  22. I think it's time for you illiterate halwits to open a book and STUDY
    3
  23. You are wrong. Italy is one
    3
  24. No he wasn't
    3
  25.  @thebender7458  Yes, but still...Italy won
    2
  26.  @sheadoherty7434  Thank God and thanks Jenner
    2
  27.  @rathinmajumder441  Actually the 6TH battle was a win for Italians
    2
  28. Well, he had his lacks, like everyone....
    2
  29. Explain
    2
  30. 12. The majority won by Italians btw, despite Cadorna
    2
  31. I don't know if he was really larger than life, but he sure as hell tried to be! 😂
    2
  32.  @mebsrea  Ahahahahahaha bs, AH was aiming to replace the Italian culture with German or Slav, Italy respected Alto Adige traditions. History and Truth talk: AH betrayed many times the alliance with Italy thus voiding it, Italy simply used the chance to free the Italian people and lands from Austrian clutches before the Italian culture was erased, though not before making at least one attemp at peace. Too bad AH government was arrogant, scornful, self important and overconfident in its military power, too bad that time nor betrayal nor Germany couldn't help and was Austria faced an humiliating defeat like the worthless state it was
    2
  33. Nope he wasn't
    2
  34. He wasn't a great general but those tactics were the same in uk's and French army
    2
  35. Well true. Cavour was the mastermind, a statesman. But even he couldn't have unified Italy alone. It was an effort from everyone
    2
  36. Source? I bet it's Bocca(LOL)
    2
  37.  @augustuscaesar8287  Roosevelt, like most men of his time, was racist or prone to indulge in racism to appeal some electors, true. But his Deal saved post recession America ( with an help of the war). Keynesian policy are necessary when economy is in a slump: there is no such thing as the "Invisible Hand"
    2
  38. And it's nothing compared to smallpox!
    2
  39. Yet Italians managed to win the majority of Isonzo Battles
    2
  40. Hotzendorf might want a word about cruelty and incompetence. Btw, Italy kicked your....
    2
  41.  @drinmaliqi9531  What?
    2
  42. Another thing: Italy destroyed AH army BEFORE the dissolution, which was caused, among others things, by the military defeat
    2
  43. ​ @jezalb2710  What do you mean gone?
    2
  44. Only one DOCUMENTED. Who knows how many times this despicable trick was used. And I read 2% of people who took variolation died
    1
  45. AHAHAHAHAHAHA Italy won WW1 DESTROYING AH, Entente couldn't defeat Germany, who cannot win a war, 3 vs1 but what could you expect from a coalition who had the notoriously surrendering people, aka the French, the people who ran and hid and never won a fight alone, the English ( the only ones to lose against people with spears and who got kicked by Afghans left and right) and those who will eventually lost against men in black pyjamas. Three PATHETIC nations Lol
    1
  46.  @alviseossena3238  Italy destroyed AH army actually
    1
  47.  @alastairbrewster4274  Ethiopia used musket, Zulu only spear! 😂😂😂 uk and France are ridiculous, their war History is pathetic, Italy 2000 years ago dominated most of them and kept winning and dominating in Middle Ages throughout marine power when those two were getting their behind handed to them!🤣🤣🤣 France and uk are only good at killing civilians and hide or surrendering!
    1
  48.  @demonprinces17  Ahahahahahaha nope. Italy sent an army in France, thanks to them Germany in 1918 didn't take Paris
    1
  49.  @demonprinces17  Austrian troops were humiliated by Italians troops. Italy is the only one who destroyed its opponents, but uk and France, being the arrogant good for nothing they are (even with huge Italian's help they could not defeat the Germans) didn't respect the pact, as they usually do. It's typical of them to take what they haven't earned and against Germany they didn't earn squat
    1
  50.  @demonprinces17  Because French and English are treacherous and never keep their promises
    1
  51.  @alviseossena3238  Because French and English are little treacherous people who never keep promises they make
    1
  52. More like:abtivaxxers: "you sure of that?"
    1
  53.  @Mitchmeow  They were amost as bad, if not as bad, as Cadorna.
    1
  54.  @Mitchmeow  Tsar Nichola? You are joking. No, they weren't better, the tactics were the same. You do know that battle was an Italian victory? Should I remember you Verdun? A meat grinder for both the contenders. Or maybe Gallipoli? That was a disaster. Cadorna wasn't a great general but he wasn't the only one
    1
  55.  @Mitchmeow  They don't? Aren't they battles in WW1? And Verdun was considered untouchable by French High command. Passchendaele whose fault was? It's you who showed your ignorance over the matter, when you talked about the Battle of Asiago as a defeat for Italy when it was, in fact, a victory. It's a fact Lol, bet you think Somme it's a victory for the allies. Lmao
    1
  56.  @Mitchmeow  They are similar. Same mentality, same tactics, same irresponsibility. You seem to not know that or ignore it, which show you never really read about WW1
    1
  57. Bs Andreas. And you know it
    1
  58. Misunderstood? She was a criminal, head of a narco state
    1
  59. Caporetto? Yes, not only his fault but also his fault
    1
  60.  @westonstevens3239  Like did Six battle for Austria. Which was knocked out by Battle of Vittorio Veneto
    1
  61. ​ @rathinmajumder441  No, my Romans ancestors would have been delighted by such victory, Italy "delenda" Austria-Hungary. Your ancestors wouldn't know, steppe people never have something like "victory" to boast about
    1
  62. That would be uk...or France . Either running away or surrendering. Usa instead is the ally you DON'T want to follow in a war: guaranteed defeat.
    1
  63.  @clintstewart5545  Truth hurts...LMAO
    1
  64.  @rathinmajumder441  It wasn't a definite victory but a victory nonetheless. I don't see how it can be considered otherwise I don't know if it's the first, Fornovo 1494 may count
    1
  65. It was not more industrialised than the North (and viceversa) , but with more illiteracy
    1
  66. Ahahahahahaha no one will p .. on yours because you are a nobody!
    1
  67. Yes. Time travel would be dangerous for that alone
    1
  68. Ahahah the only traitors were AH and uk
    1
  69.  @sithwolf8017  The plague...SARS...Ebola....Machupo....
    1
  70. He wasn't an isolationist, he was a Nazi
    1
  71. Do a video on Francesco Baracca
    1
  72. WW1 alone. Has America even won a war alone? WW2 was won with USSR. Vietnam and Korea were humiliation.
    1
  73.  @dkupke  Actually Italy performed better than booths, winning alone whereas they couldn't win 3vs1. They didn't want to make Italy more powerful hence the broken promises
    1
  74. She must have been ignorant
    1
  75. "We are gonna build a wall. And the Mongols will pay for it!"
    1
  76. Both Balto and Togo were good doggos. Seppala was a bit of an asshole but the dog did what they do best: to serve
    1
  77.  @rathinmajumder441  Ahahahahahahaahahahahahahaaha which "reLiAblE souRces"? The Germans? The English? The same who make propaganda about Somme and Verdun, where TRUE RELIABLE SOURCES say they were defeats given how they lost twice as many Germans? This show your hypocrisy. Rout no, but it was defeated, that's why it had to call Germany ( who got his behind sore battling against Russia) in 1916, to avoid being destroyed. So Italians did great, facing a superior army I mean, Germans and Entente efforts were there too but couldn't defeat the enemy 2vs1, Germany and Austria against Russia and France and uk against Germany, because their warfare ability is comical. Stop whining, is universally accepted the Allies bar Italy did horribly in WW1 and Germany did not fare better( had to wait for Russia to collapse), your bs makes no sense
    1
  78.  @rathinmajumder441  🤡
    1
  79. Diabolik's car?
    1
  80. She was. Sadly
    1
  81. Ahahahahah Leonidas? Leonidas was brave, Custer was an incompetent coward
    1
  82. Haig and Joffre: you called?
    1
  83.  @Friedrich25-ph3wu  Did he? When? Source?
    1
  84.  @CJM-rg5rt  The plague started in Kazakhstan or around there. Influenza started probably everywhere
    1
  85. Traitor. Endangering your country by spilling secrets on some operations is no hero behaviour
    1
  86. Plague - the Black Death Tuberculosis- the White Death Cholera- the Blue Death Yellow fever- the Yellow Death?
    1
  87. No
    1
  88. Sardinians are Italians
    1
  89. And without Italy French culture wouldn't exist
    1
  90. It didn't get better with Mao, 60 millions died because of him
    1
  91.  @Level5_Goblin  Instead, under Mao, TENS of millions starved in few years
    1
  92.  @Level5_Goblin  Yeah, because no one tried something like that again
    1
  93.  @Level5_Goblin  And Mao practically retired
    1
  94. Exactly
    1
  95. Actually it is Alto Adige and now there is bilingualism. Bolzano has an Italian majority though, like Trentino and Friuli Venetia Giulia: the krauts dream to eradicate Italian culture and languages never had results
    1
  96. ​ @cactuslietuva  Ahahahahahaha Ahahahahahaha Ahahahahahaha Ahahahahahaha Ahahahahahaha too bad there are TONS of evidences that show what gulag really were
    1
  97.  @edwardaugustus9680  Haig was no different from Cadorna
    1
  98.  @loke6664  Haig, Cadorna, the Austrian generals,the Russians, Churchill, the Germans...all though similarly
    1
  99.  @loke6664  Well, Churchill tactics at Gallipoli were not so much different than Cadorna's... There was not military genius back then among generals. Rommel though, I've read he was bit different...
    1
  100.  @loke6664  No, I'm talking about WW1. His tacit were more infiltration than just "let them butcher soldier until someone pass". Or so I've read. About WW2, yes, Guderian was a genius too, but it must be taken in consideration Rommel didn't have the same means or he would have passed at El Alamein. And Finnish were amazing in their war against USSR, not many would have resisted that much time
    1
  101. ​ @eyemnew2991 Get your shot. It's better than polio
    1
  102. No it hasn't. If did, you'd know very quickly
    1
  103. Not really
    1
  104. Wonder if the kid was infected and had/has immunity
    1
  105. Nazi sympathiser and a Nazi himself. Next question
    1
  106. Five? Two.
    1
  107. Because he asked Lincon to declare the abolition of slavery and Lincon didn't want to
    1
  108.  @Friedrich25-ph3wu  So did the French and the English. How come they are considered good?
    1
  109.  @Friedrich25-ph3wu  Again, proofs?
    1
  110. He did
    1
  111. Guess Haig, Joffre, Niveller were wrong then with their 40th battle of Somme, 71th battle of Champagne and 1001th battle of no man lands
    1
  112. ​ @TurfShifter Agree
    1
  113. Thank God he never became President!
    1
  114. Yes they would have lost. After all Entente "might"( LOL) couldn't handle Germany 2 vs1
    1
  115. They are all dead
    1
  116.  @zadoc2339  Everyone? I mean, Italians are Romans's descendants.
    1
  117.  @billfurlong5954  In 1848 all challenged Austria. In 1959 it begun in Piedmont Sardinia. And?
    1
  118. No, he put Italy before politics. That's what a patriot do
    1
  119. It was quite a cool style. Some use it today too
    1
  120.  @pieshka6  It's a matter of taste I guess
    1
  121.  @NaViAgain-ts9lj  European?
    1
  122. Sources? Even if it was true he was Italian
    1
  123. His politcs 90 years before now. Not the politics since the start of 2000s, with Bush wars uh?
    1