Comments by "No Name" (@NoName-hg6cc) on "VICE" channel.

  1. The important thing is that you saw the light and accepted it was one of the worse crime syndicates ever
    15
  2.  People who Use youtube  It was a RICH empire before English came with their murdering, exploitation, looting. English view is based on bias, delusion and hypocrisy
    5
  3.  @steveforster9764  What I said it's based on the factual Truth
    4
  4. Maybe because English had the most vicious crime syndicate ever?
    3
  5.  @ThePirat2011  Germany is untrustworthy
    3
  6. It's not for whoever read ACTUAL History books. So not the English, who still believe it was good instead of a force of evil
    3
  7. No, it wasn't. When, in 1800, it became the centre, uk was already exploiting other countries' resources
    3
  8.  @morgandaniels4178  They are sadly not lies. uk is evil
    3
  9. Maybe Ancien Aglo saxon do have a wardrobe where all the stuff is 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    2
  10.  @mrcool2107  No, they trade them only
    2
  11. Ahahahahahaha whataboutism won't save you from your responsibilities
    2
  12.  @barryallen871  It is, since there isn't a genuine interest, it's only to focus on something else than uk heinous crimes
    2
  13. YES
    1
  14. uk, the worst crime syndicate EVER!
    1
  15.  @hi-ve1cw  Ah yes, being killed, enslaved and exploited was a good thing for them. Poor English, forced to exploiting others to enrich themselves!
    1
  16. And what's the alternative? Communism? No, thank you
    1
  17. And the British Museum
    1
  18. So when he wrote because I got high....he was high
    1
  19.  @gubgub3275  He wasn't. Like Elizabeth wasn't (but she was Elizabeth the Second). Prove it was
    1
  20. USA is not in the Commonwealth, nor is Europe
    1
  21. She knows A LOT about history contrary to you and won't let it be forgotten to plaese the inheritors of that crime syndicate
    1
  22. You could fit a supermassive black hole in supremacist crime empire lovers' arguments
    1
  23. Maybe they want to keep trading without having a king from a puny irrelevant kingdom as their head 🤣
    1
  24. And? Maybe those countries were the most exploited by English greed
    1
  25.  @classicepisodesofcrimewatc9971  Idiot
    1
  26.  @rondelf9193  Nope, they stole, ruined and stalled History.
    1
  27. Or maybe you should learn about the crime empire English had and has and its centers, centers like Oxford
    1
  28.  @jonathanmorgan6565  Of all the empires, british empire was the one who made the least positive impact on the world. It was the most vicious, cruel and disgusting crime syndicate ever existed. The colonies argument is bs and not even particularly true: look at uk Africa colonies... Oxford is what it is thank to money stolen and plundered richness around the world. The least it could do it's recognize this. Easy
    1
  29.  @jonathanmorgan6565  1) Everyone did, true. Nowadays though other nations learned from past mistakes. uk didn't. 2) Ahahahahahaha again, that's not true and it has nothing to do with uk itself: the areas had already better infrastructure than any other part if the world. Argentina is Italian and Spanish, not English. Chile is Spanish. Both are quite good. Australia had his native population almost wiped out. Go see Bangladesh. Compare it with Tunisi. Or Eritrea. Or, again, Chile. India would have been way better off than today without uk nasty jackboot over its head for a century. Compare Sudan with Mexico. Who's better? With Tunisia or Morocco: who has better quality of life? Want to do the same with Botswana or Cameroon? The state who suffered less were the ones NOT under uk's vicious rule
    1
  30.  @jonathanmorgan6565  🤣 You are ignoring CENTURIES of India unity, like the Maurya Empire or the Mughal empire, wich existed WAY before either England or uk existed
    1
  31. "I'm Steven Fasteau" The girl: DOUBT
    1