Comments by "" (@HUNDREDACREWOOD.) on "USA TODAY"
channel.
-
Why, because your pea brain cant handle more than one thing at a time ?
Have you not kept up with the FRaudit ? Arizona Republican Officials are calling for an end to it, because they admit that its all a sham..
Too bad they discovered that the "missing deleted hard drive" wasnt really deleted or missing, huh ?
I bet you creamed your little maga hat when you heard it was deleted, right ? Of course you did.
The investigations by the Attorney General and the Southern District of New York are no joke pal, theyre real, and Trump doesnt have William Barr, or the office of the President to protect him from prosecution any longer, and your bloated orange shitstain of a cult leader is going down.
Maybe its time you moved on and found another loser to be obsessed with, whatta ya think, Trump trash ?
17
-
16
-
Prosecutors said Perry “couldn’t keep his anger under control,” and instigated the confrontation by driving into a crowd of people. They also claimed he’d previously spoken about killing protesters — and how a person could get away with it by claiming self-defense.
During the trial, which began March 27, prosecutors showed the jury text messages and social media communications where Perry talked about killing protesters in the weeks before the shooting. “I might have to kill a few people on my way to work, they are rioting outside my apartment complex,” he wrote to a friend in June 2020. On another occasion he said, “I might go to Dallas to shoot looters.” In DMs, according to reporting by the Austin Chronicle, a fellow gun owner warned him: “We went through the same training,” he said. “Shooting after creating an event where you have to shoot, is not a good shoot.”
After killing Foster, Perry told police Foster had raised the barrel of his rifle and pointed it at him. “I thought he was going to kill me,” he told police officers on body camera footage of him being taken into custody. “I’ve never been so scared in my life.” Witnesses refuted Perry’s claim that Foster had raised the gun, however, and a prosecutor said it was recovered with the safety on and no bullet in the chamber. “He did not have to engage with the protesters, Garrett Foster, or anybody else,” prosecutor Elizabeth Lawson said Thursday in her closing statement, according to the Austin Chronicle. “You cannot shoot and kill someone for walking up to you while exercising the right to open carry.”
14
-
13
-
Prosecutors said Perry “couldn’t keep his anger under control,” and instigated the confrontation by driving into a crowd of people. They also claimed he’d previously spoken about killing protesters — and how a person could get away with it by claiming self-defense.
During the trial, which began March 27, prosecutors showed the jury text messages and social media communications where Perry talked about killing protesters in the weeks before the shooting. “I might have to kill a few people on my way to work, they are rioting outside my apartment complex,” he wrote to a friend in June 2020. On another occasion he said, “I might go to Dallas to shoot looters.” In DMs, according to reporting by the Austin Chronicle, a fellow gun owner warned him: “We went through the same training,” he said. “Shooting after creating an event where you have to shoot, is not a good shoot.”
After killing Foster, Perry told police Foster had raised the barrel of his rifle and pointed it at him. “I thought he was going to kill me,” he told police officers on body camera footage of him being taken into custody. “I’ve never been so scared in my life.” Witnesses refuted Perry’s claim that Foster had raised the gun, however, and a prosecutor said it was recovered with the safety on and no bullet in the chamber. “He did not have to engage with the protesters, Garrett Foster, or anybody else,” prosecutor Elizabeth Lawson said Thursday in her closing statement, according to the Austin Chronicle. “You cannot shoot and kill someone for walking up to you while exercising the right to open carry.”
11
-
@Liscome
Prosecutors said Perry “couldn’t keep his anger under control,” and instigated the confrontation by driving into a crowd of people. They also claimed he’d previously spoken about killing protesters — and how a person could get away with it by claiming self-defense.
During the trial, which began March 27, prosecutors showed the jury text messages and social media communications where Perry talked about killing protesters in the weeks before the shooting. “I might have to kill a few people on my way to work, they are rioting outside my apartment complex,” he wrote to a friend in June 2020. On another occasion he said, “I might go to Dallas to shoot looters.” In DMs, according to reporting by the Austin Chronicle, a fellow gun owner warned him: “We went through the same training,” he said. “Shooting after creating an event where you have to shoot, is not a good shoot.”
After killing Foster, Perry told police Foster had raised the barrel of his rifle and pointed it at him. “I thought he was going to kill me,” he told police officers on body camera footage of him being taken into custody. “I’ve never been so scared in my life.” Witnesses refuted Perry’s claim that Foster had raised the gun, however, and a prosecutor said it was recovered with the safety on and no bullet in the chamber. “He did not have to engage with the protesters, Garrett Foster, or anybody else,” prosecutor Elizabeth Lawson said Thursday in her closing statement, according to the Austin Chronicle. “You cannot shoot and kill someone for walking up to you while exercising the right to open carry.”
9
-
8
-
@ce2flaco
wrong. Prosecutors said Perry “couldn’t keep his anger under control,” and instigated the confrontation by driving into a crowd of people. They also claimed he’d previously spoken about killing protesters — and how a person could get away with it by claiming self-defense.
During the trial, which began March 27, prosecutors showed the jury text messages and social media communications where Perry talked about killing protesters in the weeks before the shooting. “I might have to kill a few people on my way to work, they are rioting outside my apartment complex,” he wrote to a friend in June 2020. On another occasion he said, “I might go to Dallas to shoot looters.” In DMs, according to reporting by the Austin Chronicle, a fellow gun owner warned him: “We went through the same training,” he said. “Shooting after creating an event where you have to shoot, is not a good shoot.”
After killing Foster, Perry told police Foster had raised the barrel of his rifle and pointed it at him. “I thought he was going to kill me,” he told police officers on body camera footage of him being taken into custody. “I’ve never been so scared in my life.” Witnesses refuted Perry’s claim that Foster had raised the gun, however, and a prosecutor said it was recovered with the safety on and no bullet in the chamber. “He did not have to engage with the protesters, Garrett Foster, or anybody else,” prosecutor Elizabeth Lawson said Thursday in her closing statement, according to the Austin Chronicle. “You cannot shoot and kill someone for walking up to you while exercising the right to open carry.”
7
-
7
-
7
-
@clickclack8081
Why, because your pea brain cant handle more than one thing at a time ?
Have you not kept up with the FRaudit ? Arizona Republican Officials are calling for an end to it, because they admit that its all a sham..
Too bad they discovered that the "missing deleted hard drive" wasnt really deleted or missing, huh ?
I bet you creamed your little maga hat when you heard it was deleted, right ? Of course you did.
The investigations by the Attorney General and the Southern District of New York are no joke pal, theyre real, and Trump doesnt have William Barr, or the office of the President to protect him from prosecution any longer, and your bloated orange shitstain of a cult leader is going down.
Maybe its time you moved on and found another loser to be obsessed with, whatta ya think, Trump trash ?
7
-
7
-
Prosecutors said Perry “couldn’t keep his anger under control,” and instigated the confrontation by driving into a crowd of people. They also claimed he’d previously spoken about killing protesters — and how a person could get away with it by claiming self-defense.
During the trial, which began March 27, prosecutors showed the jury text messages and social media communications where Perry talked about killing protesters in the weeks before the shooting. “I might have to kill a few people on my way to work, they are rioting outside my apartment complex,” he wrote to a friend in June 2020. On another occasion he said, “I might go to Dallas to shoot looters.” In DMs, according to reporting by the Austin Chronicle, a fellow gun owner warned him: “We went through the same training,” he said. “Shooting after creating an event where you have to shoot, is not a good shoot.”
After killing Foster, Perry told police Foster had raised the barrel of his rifle and pointed it at him. “I thought he was going to kill me,” he told police officers on body camera footage of him being taken into custody. “I’ve never been so scared in my life.” Witnesses refuted Perry’s claim that Foster had raised the gun, however, and a prosecutor said it was recovered with the safety on and no bullet in the chamber. “He did not have to engage with the protesters, Garrett Foster, or anybody else,” prosecutor Elizabeth Lawson said Thursday in her closing statement, according to the Austin Chronicle. “You cannot shoot and kill someone for walking up to you while exercising the right to open carry.”
7
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
@mickga3564
Trumps approval numbers have been a steady 43% for 3.5 years, he's the only president who has ever maintained that low of a number, throughout their entire term, in the history of the U.S
Rather than run to the same "thats what the polls said about hillary in 2016" bullshit, maybe you should realize that the polls showed her beating Trump in the popular vote by about 3 million votes, but the electoral college chose to ignore the voice of the American people, because they simply didnt want Hillary as President, and while I dont blame them for not wanting her, they fucked the American people, and the election process, and chose your orange shitstain savior instead. Lest we forget, as so many of you ignorant Trumpie-leeches do, that America was wanting something different, somebody that wasnt a politician, somebody they thought might actually care for us, rather than the interests of lobbyists and the big banks and corporations they represented, so they voted for Trump, a washed up reality tv personality, who is an infamous New York Real Estate CONMAN instead.
They, like yourself Im sure, werent aware of who he actually is, and ignorantly voted for him as a result.
The difference is, the majority of those same people that voted for him have now seen what an incompetent, corrupt lying buffoon he is, and, as the previously before mentioned polls reflect, a lot of those people are abandoning ship, leaving the orange chump with the lowest polling numbers in the history of presidential elections...
The reason his approval numbers have barely fluctuated, is because his base of supporters, like yourself, rabid in their creepy fervor for the bloated orange douchebag, have been, up to this point, steadfast in their misdirected hero worship, too ignorant and blinded by this pathetic cult of personality.
Trump has actually lost a lot of voter support across the country, and most importantly, in ALL of the hardcore battleground swing states that he wouldve needed to get reelected.
Even Fox "News" is reporting his bad polling numbers, a solid 10 points behind Biden, yet, Trumpies deplorable minions, again, such as yourself and your undereducated maga-hat wearing retard buddies, still cant accept it.
quite pathetic.
Now, due to his cruelty, indifference, ineptness and intolerance, his numbers are continuing to slide, in every major, credible poll across the country, and he wont recover from it, no matter how many pathetic, self-grandizing, everyone fawn over me selfrighteous rallies he holds.
The only people that go to those rallies are the people that are gonna vote for him anyway.
He had a term as President, but in 203 days, his ass will no longer be President, no matter how much you wish it were different.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I bet she supported the police until she had her own personal confrontation with them. The police are not here to protect and serve the American public, as stated by the Supreme Court. The police, unlike fireman or paramedics, cruise the streets, 24 hours a day, scanning license plates, looking for any infraction or reason they can, to harass, abuse, extort and incarcerate you. They are not your friends, they are pariahs on society...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shanehiggins3033
THATS 100% BULLSHIT
The DOJ has plenty of evidence, supplied by the Jan 6th Committee, that's why you maga-trash won't watch the hearings, they go against every lie Trump told you, and you just can't handle the truth.
1. SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY
is a crime in various jurisdictions of conspiring against the authority or legitimacy of the state. As a FORM OF SEDITION it has been described as a SERIOUS COUNTERPART TO TREASON targeting activities that undermine the state without directly attacking it.
ILLEGAL
2. ELECTION TAMPERING in Georgia, try to get their Secretary of State to magically come up with 11,780 votes.
ILLEGAL
3. The National Archives had attempted to recover presidential records stored at Trump’s Florida home for months, dating back to last year
Officials retrieved 15 boxes from Mar-a-Lago in January, including at least 700 PAGES OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS
and asked the Justice Department to examine the former president’s handling of records.
The investigation ultimately led the FBI to execute a search warrant at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence earlier this month, when agents seized 11 sets of Classified Documents
The Justice Department is probing whether Trump violated the Espionage Act
or two other federal statutes
YES, ITS AGAINST THE LAW TO VIOLATE THE ESPIONAGE ACT REGARDLESS OF WHAT TUCKER CARLSON IS FEEDING YOU.
ILLEGAL
4. FINANCIAL FRAUD AND TAX FRAUD in New York
Trump’s Russia scandal
Russian interference in U.S. elections to assist Trump
(read the Mueller Report)
The controversy surrounding the Trump inaugural fund
Alleged Emoluments clause violations
Trump’s hidden tax returns
Improper gifts Trump allegedly received
Post-defeat election interference (Georgia)
Trump bringing classified materials to Mar-a-Lago (VIOLATION OF THE ESPIONAGE ACT)
The Jan. 6 attack and efforts to overturn the 2020 election
(SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY)
Trump using military aid to extort Ukraine
(EXTORTION AND BRIBERY)
Trump’s “hush money” controversies
Trump’s dubious pardons
Trump’s dubious fundraising operation, (using campaign funds to pay his legal bills, paid for by suckers like you)
Trump’s New York real estate fraud...
1
-
There is a law that says official White House Documents are not to be destroyed, tampered with or removed from the White House. Trump tampered with, flushed, destroyed and removed BOXES FULL OF WHITE HOUSE DOCUMENTS ... Regardless of what's in the documents, it's still against the law, and Trump did it, knowing it was against the law.
What kind of an adult would flush official documents down a toilet, rather than just throw them away ?
Trump, acting like the spoiled child he is, no doubt did it to make a point, to himself, by himself...
He's a mentally challenged scumbag and unfit for office.
1
-
You keep crossing your fingers bobby, it'll all be over soon...
There is a law that says official White House Documents are not to be destroyed, tampered with or removed from the White House. Trump tampered with, flushed, destroyed and removed BOXES FULL OF WHITE HOUSE DOCUMENTS ... Regardless of what's in the documents, it's still against the law, and Trump did it, knowing it was against the law.
What kind of an adult would flush official documents down a toilet, rather than just throw them away ?
Trump, acting like the spoiled child he is, no doubt did it to make a point, to himself, by himself...
He's a mentally challenged scumbag and unfit for office.
1
-
Washington:
The Arizona man that some right-wing figures baselessly claim was part of secret FBI plot to orchestrate the January 6 insurrection told the House panel investigating the attack that he has no ties to the FBI or law enforcement, a committee aide told CNN.
The aide provided details about the man, Ray Epps, and his cooperation with the panel, after his name came up at a Senate hearing on Tuesday. Two GOP senators referred to Epps while questioning a top FBI official about whether FBI agents infiltrated or incited the pro-Trump mob.
"The Select Committee has interviewed Mr. Epps," a spokesperson for the committee told CNN in a statement on Tuesday after the hearing. "Mr. Epps informed us that he was not employed by, working with, or acting at the direction of any law enforcement agency on January 5th or 6th or at any other time, and that he has never been an informant for the FBI or any other law enforcement agency."
The theory about Epps is based on circumstantial speculation and little -- if any -- concrete evidence. That hasn't stopped Fox personalities and GOP lawmakers from pushing the idea that Epps was a central player in the FBI's supposed false-flag operation.
Promoters of the claim focused on several videos of Epps encouraging people to attack the Capitol. They also point out that his photo was on an early FBI "most wanted" list, but was later removed. Because he hasn't been arrested, the theory goes, he must be working for the FBI.
In one of the videos, which was filmed in Washington on January 5, Epps told a group of Trump supporters that "tomorrow, we need to go into the Capitol." This drew some positive responses from the crowd, but also some jeers, and some people starting to accuse Epps of being a "fed."
While authorities haven't commented, there is a plausible explanation for why Epps hasn't been charged with a crime. Nearly all of the 700-plus defendants charged in connection with January 6 either stepped inside the Capitol building or are accused of assaulting police on Capitol grounds. To date, no evidence has emerged showing that Epps entered the Capitol on January 6 or that he tussled with police...
1
-
1
-
@bradpotter6401
Washington:
The Arizona man that some right-wing figures baselessly claim was part of secret FBI plot to orchestrate the January 6 insurrection told the House panel investigating the attack that he has no ties to the FBI or law enforcement, a committee aide told CNN.
The aide provided details about the man, Ray Epps, and his cooperation with the panel, after his name came up at a Senate hearing on Tuesday. Two GOP senators referred to Epps while questioning a top FBI official about whether FBI agents infiltrated or incited the pro-Trump mob.
"The Select Committee has interviewed Mr. Epps," a spokesperson for the committee told CNN in a statement on Tuesday after the hearing. "Mr. Epps informed us that he was not employed by, working with, or acting at the direction of any law enforcement agency on January 5th or 6th or at any other time, and that he has never been an informant for the FBI or any other law enforcement agency."
The theory about Epps is based on circumstantial speculation and little -- if any -- concrete evidence. That hasn't stopped Fox personalities and GOP lawmakers from pushing the idea that Epps was a central player in the FBI's supposed false-flag operation.
Promoters of the claim focused on several videos of Epps encouraging people to attack the Capitol. They also point out that his photo was on an early FBI "most wanted" list, but was later removed. Because he hasn't been arrested, the theory goes, he must be working for the FBI.
In one of the videos, which was filmed in Washington on January 5, Epps told a group of Trump supporters that "tomorrow, we need to go into the Capitol." This drew some positive responses from the crowd, but also some jeers, and some people starting to accuse Epps of being a "fed."
While authorities haven't commented, there is a plausible explanation for why Epps hasn't been charged with a crime. Nearly all of the 700-plus defendants charged in connection with January 6 either stepped inside the Capitol building or are accused of assaulting police on Capitol grounds. To date, no evidence has emerged showing that Epps entered the Capitol on January 6 or that he tussled with police...
1
-
@DM-sy4hg
Washington:
The Arizona man that some right-wing figures baselessly claim was part of secret FBI plot to orchestrate the January 6 insurrection told the House panel investigating the attack that he has no ties to the FBI or law enforcement, a committee aide told CNN.
The aide provided details about the man, Ray Epps, and his cooperation with the panel, after his name came up at a Senate hearing on Tuesday. Two GOP senators referred to Epps while questioning a top FBI official about whether FBI agents infiltrated or incited the pro-Trump mob.
"The Select Committee has interviewed Mr. Epps," a spokesperson for the committee told CNN in a statement on Tuesday after the hearing. "Mr. Epps informed us that he was not employed by, working with, or acting at the direction of any law enforcement agency on January 5th or 6th or at any other time, and that he has never been an informant for the FBI or any other law enforcement agency."
The theory about Epps is based on circumstantial speculation and little -- if any -- concrete evidence. That hasn't stopped Fox personalities and GOP lawmakers from pushing the idea that Epps was a central player in the FBI's supposed false-flag operation.
Promoters of the claim focused on several videos of Epps encouraging people to attack the Capitol. They also point out that his photo was on an early FBI "most wanted" list, but was later removed. Because he hasn't been arrested, the theory goes, he must be working for the FBI.
In one of the videos, which was filmed in Washington on January 5, Epps told a group of Trump supporters that "tomorrow, we need to go into the Capitol." This drew some positive responses from the crowd, but also some jeers, and some people starting to accuse Epps of being a "fed."
While authorities haven't commented, there is a plausible explanation for why Epps hasn't been charged with a crime. Nearly all of the 700-plus defendants charged in connection with January 6 either stepped inside the Capitol building or are accused of assaulting police on Capitol grounds. To date, no evidence has emerged showing that Epps entered the Capitol on January 6 or that he tussled with police...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@magaking535
Reelected ? 🤣🤣🤣
There is a law that says official White House Documents are not to be destroyed, tampered with or removed from the White House. Trump tampered with, flushed, destroyed and removed BOXES FULL OF WHITE HOUSE DOCUMENTS ... Regardless of what's in the documents, it's still against the law, and Trump did it, knowing it was against the law.
What kind of an adult would flush official documents down a toilet, rather than just throw them away ?
Trump, acting like the spoiled child he is, no doubt did it to make a point, to himself, by himself...
He's a mentally challenged scumbag and unfit for office.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stevef3336
Donald Trump, the president of the United States from 2017 to 2021, has been accused of rape, sexual assault, and sexual harassment, including non-consensual kissing or groping, by at least 25 women since the 1970s. The accusations have resulted in three instances of litigation: his then-wife Ivana made a rape claim during their 1989 divorce litigation but later recanted that claim. Business Woman Jill Harth sued Trump in 1997 alleging breach of contract while also suing for sexual harassment but agreed to forfeit her sexual harassment claim as part of a settlement she received relating to the former suit; and, in 2017, former The Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos filed a defamation lawsuit after Trump accused her of lying about her sexual misconduct allegations against him.
Two of the allegations (by Ivana Trump and Jill Harth) became public before Trump's candidacy for president, but the rest arose after a 2005 audio recording was leaked during the 2016 presidential campaign. Trump was recorded bragging that a celebrity like himself "can do anything" to women, including "just start kissing them ... I don't even wait" and "grab 'em by the pussy". Trump subsequently characterized those comments as "locker room talk" and denied actually behaving that way toward women, and he also apologized for the crude language. Many of his accusers stated that Trump's denials provoked them into going public with their allegations.
Another type of accusation was made, primarily after the audio recording surfaced, by several former Miss USA and Miss Teen USA contestants, who accused Trump of entering the dressing rooms of beauty pageant contestants. Trump, who owned the Miss Universe franchise, which includes both pageants, was accused of going into dressing rooms in 1997, 2000, 2001, and 2006, while contestants were in various stages of undress. Trump had already referred to this practice during a 2005 interview on The Howard Stern Show, saying he could "get away with things like that" because he owned the beauty pageants the women and girls were competing in.
In June 2019, writer E. Jean Carroll alleged in New York magazine that Trump raped her in a department store dressing room in 1995 or 1996. The magazine said two friends of Carroll confirmed that Carroll had previously confided in them in regard to the incident. Trump called the allegation fiction and denied ever meeting Carroll, although New York had published a photo of Trump and Carroll together in 1987.
In October 2019, the book All the President's Women: Donald Trump and the Making of a Predator by Barry Levine and Monique El-Faizy was published, containing 43 additional allegations of sexual misconduct against Trump.
Trump has denied all the allegations against him, saying he has been the victim of media bias, conspiracies, and a political smear campaign. In October 2016, Trump publicly vowed to sue all the women who have made allegations of sexual misconduct against him, as well as The New York Times for publishing the allegations, but he has yet to follow through with any legal action.
1
-
1
-
@stevef3336
I bet this doesnt matter to you though, because its your cult leader, and not Biden...
MANHATTAN (CN) - A woman who says Donald Trump raped her at a private sex party when she was 13 years old refiled a lawsuit against him Friday, two weeks after voluntarily dismissing a suit based on the same claims.
The new complaint, filed in the federal court in Manhattan, restates plaintiff Jane Doe's claims of the earlier lawsuit. Namely, that she was lured by a recruiter to summer parties hosted by co-defendant Jeffrey Epstein at an Upper East Side mansion on East 71st St., tied to a bed and forcibly raped by Trump, who slapped her with an open hand and told her he would do whatever he pleased with her.
Jane Does goes on to claim that after Epstein also forcibly raped her, he and Trump bickered over who should have taken the minor plaintiff's virginity.
The original complaint was accompanied by two declarations.
The first declaration, signed by Jane Doe herself, detailed Trump's alleged "savage sexual attack" on the then-13-year-old plaintiff.
The second declaration was signed by pseudonymous Tiffany Doe, who said she was hired by Jeffrey Epstein throughout the 1990s to recruit adolescent women to attend the billionaire's parties.
Tiffany Doe claims she convinced the then-13-year-old plaintiff to attend the parties as a means to break in to New York's professional modeling world. In her declaration, Tiffany Doe says she witnessed four sexual encounters in which Jane Doe was forced to have sex with Trump, and two encounters involving the plaintiff and Jeffrey Epstein.
The Tiffany Doe declaration included Epstein's threats against her and her family for disclosing the details of any sexual abuse of minors by Epstein and his party guests, swearing under penalty of perjury that she understands that her and her family's lives are "now in grave danger."
The new complaint includes an additional witness exhibit from an anonymous "Joan Doe" whose sworn declaration says Jane Doe told her what happened with Trump and Epstein during the 1994-1995 school year.
Jane Doe says she has been subjected to painful daily reminders of the alleged assault due to the tremendous about of media coverage Trump's presidential campaign has received since he announced his candidacy in mid-June 2015.
Representatives of Trump and his campaign could not immediately be reached for comment on Friday. However, two weeks ago Alan Garten, executive vice president and general counsel for the Trump Organization, told Courthouse News via email that Jane Doe's allegations "are completely frivolous and appear to be politically motivated."
He also went on to say the Trump Organization warned her lawyer, New Jersey attorney Thomas Meagher, "that in the event he decides to refile his complaint we will seek to have him sanctioned."
Perhaps in anticipation of such a move, a second attorney has joined the lawsuit, J. Cheney Mason of Florida.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@oofballz4328
after 3 years of democrats constantly explaining to you Trump supporters, all of the illegal crap that Trump did in office, and you all ignoring and denying it, we have finally had enough and just dont care to engage in conversation with you anymore.
The Mueller Report came out 2 years ago, stating that Don Jr, Jared Kushner & Guliani all three, met with a Russian agent, at Trump tower, who brought them dirt on Hillary, proving that the Trump administration colluded with Russia, but you Trumpers wouldnt read the Mueller Report, to learn for yourself.., instead, you idiots go around saying "Russia, Russia, Russia" because thats the bullshit Tucker Carlson and Trump both spoonfed you, and like the simpleminded sheep you are, you believe it.
thats my point. you people dont care about facts or truth, and the mental gymnastics you have to do to continue living in denial while all of these indictments are dropping, is not only mind-blowing, but pathetic to say the least.
The Jan 6th Committee was f*cking televised, so the whole country could see and hear in real time, the facts about what happened that day, told by over 1000 witnesses from both sides, people that were there, or behind the scenes, and not a single one of you maga-clowns watched a minute of it, instead, you chose to remain ignorant and continue ignoring what really happened that day.
Ive personally asked at least 25 or 30 of you WHY YOU THINK TRUMP IS INNOCENT OF 93 FEDERAL INDICTMENTS, and not one of you will answer.
Its the fact that you people have embarrassed this country, as well as yourselves, by totally ignoring Trumps crimes, to the point that having a conversation with you, that youll both dismiss or deny, just isnt worth our time anymore.
The writing is on the wall, and the end is well on its way, we won, and we just dont have anything to say to you people anymore.
1-800-LEAVE THE CULT
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1