Comments by "IIIRattleHeadIII" (@badass6300) on "Feminists Debate Sex Work: The Soho Forum" video.

  1. Yet nobody talks that modern dating, most of the time, has become a loose form of prostitution.
    59
  2. or sell it as a date.
    4
  3.  @noblephoenix6151  doesn't have to be.
    4
  4. well you hear about those all the time. This you don't, at least not where I am from.
    3
  5.  @noblephoenix6151  what you mean is entropic more than economic. We are talking finances here.
    3
  6. If we shouldn't commodify human lives, then all the people working in the mines, constructions, oil rigs, and any other dangerous job out there that they are working, that is extremely essential to our survival should also not be working those jobs. And they are 99% men btw.
    2
  7.  @waddadawd  well how is debating the war going to change anything? It's not like Russia and Ukraine are debating it... Issues that people in the west care about are usually made up by the same people that are caring about them, and go against statistics, research and science...
    2
  8.  @noblephoenix6151  I'm saying that relationships don't have to be financially economic. Otherwise, walking around is not a financially economic activity.
    2
  9.  @noblephoenix6151  Yes.
    2
  10.  @ExpressShirtself  What?
    1
  11.  @ExpressShirtself  for pirating music? Yeah and now we don't get new albums from tons of bands, new bands make 3-5 albums and just tour, music has almost reverted to being a service, rather than a product. Excellent...
    1
  12.  @killakilla4412  and god is evil, so don't listen to god, assuming that he exists.
    1
  13.  @noraanderson3503  Modern dating has become a loose form of prostitution though. Dates can't simply be spending time together and going for walks and nothing else, they always have to involve some dumb restaurants, cafes, bars, clubs, etc, etc.
    1
  14.  @waddadawd  Let people deal with their problems. The west should keep out of other countries' business.
    1
  15.  @waddadawd  Well these "planet saviors" should be ignored.
    1
  16.  @7eyesopenwide168  that's to ensure that smartarses don't go around suing the state and other people.
    1
  17.  @7eyesopenwide168  yeah back in the day, when there were no jobs for women, sure, nowadays, not necessarily, but most of the time yes.
    1
  18.  @7eyesopenwide168  I mean if they are going to leverage something, that's all the got to leverage in general.
    1
  19.  @7eyesopenwide168  it's not financial.
    1
  20.  @katieandnick4113  Very true, but it's women more than men that want to chase their feelings. A man earning the average salary in Europe or North America has more than enough money to take care of the kids, but that means no luxuries, which women think they "deserve". This means no holidays, no branded clothes, no branded phones, no jewelry, having to buy second hand from time to time and just standard things. You think that before the industrial revolution women didn't work on the farm? Or helped in the workshop? They did, the moment they weren't pregnant or had to take care of babies. That's why they wanted to be pregnant so much, better to be pregnant than to do back breaking work 12 hours a day 6 days a week. The industrial revolution changed things a bit, so women didn't want to work anymore and were priviliged NOT to work. I bet you that if women had to work manual labor 12 hours a day, 6 days a week, 95%+ of women wouldn't work, not just not want to work, they just wouldn't. Keep in mind if you were born the 18th or 19th century, NOT in to a wealthy family, you couldn't be a doctor, lawyer or teacher, in administration and any other form of office job. It was back breaking manual labor for you, 12 hours a day, 6 days a week, during the period of the greatest inequality in the last 1000 years. Edit: Also women refuse to live communally, they are all about the nuclear family... so that drives prices up to the freaking sky for everything.
    1