Comments by "IIIRattleHeadIII" (@badass6300) on "What Happens To The Real Estate Market When All The Boomers... Die?" video.

  1. Peaceful protests don't solve anything.
    53
  2.  @Irilia_neko  No what we need are actual protests not "peaceful protests".
    12
  3.  @TheeRedBaron  You clearly don't value your time and money. Why not buy a ferrari by that logic, buy in now at 200k before it's 350k... -_-
    9
  4.  @computername  Ah yes the kids of blackstone... oh wait... Nobody is saying that people shouldn't amass wealth and if you have the proper amount of children(2-4) you will have less houses/apartments than needed regardless.
    9
  5.  @mikehamm648  What has a good multi-decade track record that appreciates faster than real estate?
    9
  6.  @randomyoutubebrowser5217  That's a falacy, because what you say assumes that there are options for people to buy cheaply and there aren't. When a house/apartment costs 15-25x times the average salary and 25-30x times the median, you don't have the option, let alone preference to spend less...
    3
  7.  @celestialstar6450  or have a limit to it. Like 3 for example is a good limit. This way you can have some for the kids.
    2
  8.  @randomyoutubebrowser5217  2-3 kids is good. And if you don't neglect them to the "education" system, they'd accumulate wealth from the age of 16-18 working as engineers, or tradesmen, or in commerce. Law and medicine sadly require official government degrees. But still.
    2
  9.  @agentzapdos4960  You can always be strong and smart(knowledgeable and capable). And if you are smart, you will be rich enough. If you are so weak that you can't live well without being born into wealth, you should hate your parents for neglecting you to the "education" system, which in 12-20 years produces weak, stupid useless people and wastes your youth. Goes doubly so for STEM. If you start specializing kids, through courses and especially self-education, from the age of 11-12 in one engineering field, or one trade, or law or commerce, by the age of 16-20 they would be a highly skilled and knowledgeable experts in their (sub)field. I know dozens of people, many of which friends and acquaintances, who by the age of 22-24 are now earning 3-7x the average salary. They ditched school as much as possible and went to private courses and most importantly self-educated themselves. And only one of them had rich parents, the rest weren't even "middle class".
    2
  10.  @randomyoutubebrowser5217  Yup, but people are too short sighted and all they care about is buying toys, branded/designer clothes, going on vacations/trips and getting drunk at the club three times a week... -_-
    1
  11.  @randymillhouse791  Agreed, also neglecting children to the "education system" instead of making them self-educate and sending them to private courses from the age of 10-12 so that by 16-20 they can be a highly skilled and knowledgeable expert in One Engeering Field, Or one trade, Or commerce, Or law.
    1
  12.  bulletflight  A better bet would have been to start self-educating and going to private courses in one engineering field, or trade, or law, or commerce and get a job in one of those sub-fields(not in law cuz you need an official degree) at the age of 16-18. I have a dozen friends and even more acquaintances that at 22-24 are earning 3-7x the average salary by ditching school as much as possible and going to private courses. They work as programmers, system admins, network engineers, mechanical engineers, electrical engineers and such. No university either.
    1
  13.  @randymillhouse791  What wouldn't work?
    1
  14. nah housing, food and clothing should be cheap and affordable...
    1