Comments by "IIIRattleHeadIII" (@badass6300) on "Is this the END of Watercooling?" video.

  1. You can thank youtubers promoting terrible generations of GPUs like the gtx 600, gtx 1000 and rtx 4000 series and other poorly priced/overpriced hardware over the years and the people that bought them.
    15
  2.  @StanageGaming  The gtx 1080 is a 60 class card(312mm² die size) sold as an 80 class card at 700$ FE MSRP and 600$ MSRP, higher than any 80 class card prior... Nvidia got 138% profit margin... up from the 40-50% they got during maxwell. The reason the performance was much better is because they skipped TSMC's 22nm and 20nm and went straight to TSMC's 16nm, which is by far the most dominant process node along with intel's 22nm and 14nm for their respective times. AMD went to Global Foundry's vastly inferior process node that was on par with TSMC's 22nm.
    1
  3.  @Raizan-IO  When people are to blame, they are to blame, it's fact.
    1
  4.  @kevinerbs2778  amd has FSR and frame generation too. RT is a gimmick until next gen consoles.
    1
  5.  @StanageGaming  no problem.
    1
  6.  @Lurch-Bot  AAA games nowadays are made by teams of 800-2500 people, AAA games in the 2000s were made by 40-70 people(not counting contractors in both cases). And the efficiency drops by a lot when you have teams of that size. And the quality is worse because of the insanely high graphical fidelity. They can't test the game, because they don't have all the assets, animations, textures, objects, etc finished until a few months before release and this is all due to the push for more realistic and highly detailed graphics. Also the most sold AAA games in 2004 sold 3-5 million copies, nowadays the most sold AAA games sell 8-30 million in one year. The math is pretty simple and clear. The solution is to downsize the studios back to around 100 people, go with 2005-2009 graphical fidelity, but with modern rendering technology(Ray Tracing, illumination, modern materials, etc).
    1