Youtube comments of IIIRattleHeadIII (@badass6300).
-
935
-
934
-
635
-
423
-
411
-
329
-
322
-
319
-
278
-
264
-
261
-
253
-
253
-
229
-
200
-
179
-
178
-
174
-
163
-
161
-
159
-
159
-
156
-
149
-
141
-
138
-
136
-
For many reasons. First GDP is one of the worst metrics to go by, it's easily manipulated and hollow.
Second because a country is rich, doesn't mean its citizens are, that's a good sign of authoritarian country, weather it be pure government authority or mixed with corporations, it doesn't matter.
Instead of looking at GDP, look at the purchasing power of the median person compared to the prices of homes, food, clothing, cars and other everyday items. From the 4 I listed only clothing is not expensive, while the other 3 are unaffordable, even to people with above average income.
122
-
121
-
119
-
115
-
110
-
104
-
101
-
97
-
91
-
88
-
87
-
87
-
77
-
76
-
76
-
73
-
72
-
71
-
69
-
69
-
67
-
66
-
64
-
64
-
61
-
59
-
58
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
55
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
@janet3782 Yeah, but almost all faces and bone structures are attractive. Very few men have high standards that require you to be a 10/10.
Most men are absolutely good with a 6/10 woman, for men 5/10 is where it begins.
That means don't be fat, nothing more, be within the 18-23% body fat range, something you can achieve.
On the other side, more and more women start to look at men from 7-8/10 and up. They want a 6 foot+ man, which already removes close to 90% of men everywhere. They want a 6 pack, they want 6 figure or close to that income or in general the man to earn more than the woman by a lot, cuz not all countries can let you have a 6 figure income. And there are these bucket lists of things they require from men and tell each other that they should.
Wanna know what a man wants from a woman? Don't be fat, be nice to be around(feminine), be loyal. 3x simple things.
Are you reading some playboy magazines and articles or something?
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
@janet3782 nobody wants women to be taller, or have a bigger bust, just be fit, 18-23% body fat for women. Most men prefer B or C cup anyway.
And your bone structure doesn't matter, being fit is attractive, there are many forms of hourglasses.
Nothing more. Literally nothing more. The requirement is don't be fat, don't eat like a man or a pig, eat like a woman. Women need very little food.
The face is the hardest part for both women and men as there is nothing that can be done naturally. But still, a natural face is 95%+ of the time better than plastic surgery, lizard looking, huge bone-cheeks out of saw(the movie) people.
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
@MartinMartin-bh4ke No libertarian stands for do as you wish without hurting or intruding onto others. You can do as you wish as long as that doesn't come in conflict with someone else, hurt someone else(in any meaningful way) and you don't enforce your views, laws, religion and so on, onto others.
And politically it means that the government has so little power over people(but not companies), that even if you try to lobby and corrupt it, the government doesn't have the power to actually screw over people. But the government would keep a strict leash on companies, because companies would be protected by the government, so the government must have many policies, restrictions and laws that the companies must abide by. And of course the government should maintain political relationships with other countries, an army and essential infrastructure like roads, water and electricity.
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
@katiemylady76 I never go to clubs(only on birthdays, namedays and such). I only go to bars with friends.
A big problem is that there are no good 3rd places left to be out in my city and in the capital, where I've lived and will soon live in again, everything is paid.
I usually go to conventions, play sports(basketball, football), hike, biking, play guitar, got into bowling recently. I also play video games and and am a movie buff and go to conventions. I also like swimming, climbing and airsoft, but don't have the chance to do those often. That's where I meet most of the people and it's true that the vast majority are men.
I also go to the gym(and have for 2.5 years) which is again majority men and women are usually old aunties keeping in shape. Plus I don't think it's appropriate to hit on women in the gym. I don't go there to be flirted with, so I act like I would like to be acted towards.
I'm a programmer, so you guessed it, vast majority men yet again.
That's where the problem lies. My interests do not align with women, as seen by the fact that what I like to do surrounds me with men and very few to no women.
And that's not even touching on values and world views.
16
-
@iseeyou3129 The west was great until the early 2000s, so after the CCCP fell and people were allow to leave the country on top of having a lot of jobless people, people went west to gain wealth.
In the past decade our living standard has risen so much that our purchasing power has almost reached the western European country.
Also CCCP countries were the first countries to have low birth rates.
Nowadays I'd pick Poland, Bulgaria or Romania over western European countries, much more freedom, almost as good purchasing power and I like the culture better, no we are not conservative btw, overall we are much more progressive than western countries, just not in everything.
Also I hate huge cities, I find even the capital of my country to be ginormous, let alone western country big cities.
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
The problem is that we are not free, we are more limited than in the past 80-100 years... Governments are more authoritarian than they were after the fall of monarchies or even before that.
There are more restrictions than ever, more bureaucracy and even unofficial aristocrasy(it's quite official).
We are raised to be weak, incapable and unhealthy. They think that if they give us a room, food, clothing and toys that they are being excellent parents.
And you can no longer just get good at a skill and find a job, you need to waste your youth, 12-20 years of your life in the authoritarian institutions which produce useless people and damage you physiologically and mentally, kill any motivation, inspiration and individualism and make you conform like a soul dead, mindless drone...
And with mega corporations being a thing for the past 30-35 years you can't compete with them...
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
@coolfred9083
Because people just love stereotypes, that's why... Driving skills have nothing to do with sex/gender and everything to do with practice and experience.
It's the same here in my country, all the way in the Balkans... same mentality... that's like the cameras back in the day, where the man wouldn't let the woman take pictures as if it's a skill, but nowadays women take hundreds of more pictures than men daily. XD
And the same goes for the manual transmissions, nothing special, I don't see why people think it's some kind of a special skill, it's not...
All I've driven in the short time I've been a driver is manual and I'd love a more modern automatic(2005 or newer with 5 or more gears)... Manuals for civilian driving doesn't take almost any skill, just a little practice and muscle memory.
Though statistically, most young women in the USA can't drive a manual, but the same goes for young men. XD
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@keelyleilani1326 I think it's kinda silly to associate cars with sex, but oh well.
I like all sorts of cars, from small ones like the MX5 to big muscle cars, with the exception of those portable toilets that are the Smarts and Fiat 500s and similar.
Every car size has it's purpose and it's uniqueness.
Also I dislike SUVs, they are big, heavy, clunky and not very manuvarable and agile, and the compact and mid-size SUVs are barely better than most mid-size sedans or hatchbacks when it comes to offroad... so they are just pointless, since offroad should be their only advantage.
I too love the Honda/Acura NSX, the Supra, Skyline/GTR, Mitsobishi Lancer, Mazda MX7/8, Lexus IS-F, and many other similar cars(though the NSX is different to the ones mentioned above), they are my favorite types of cars to be honest, but I very much like cars like the MX5, Alpine110 and similar.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
They are not sex objects, but what are they to guys? They don't have the same values, they don't have the same interests, they don't care what men want or need, they are usually thinking about how they can benefit...
They are harder to get along with than with the guys, they are not good support, many stop respecting you if you go to them for help in tough times.
And sure there are exceptions, but that's why they are called exceptions, we count everyone except them.
So what exactly are women to men? Sex seems is the only thing, I don't want it to be that way, but what else is there and it is what it is.
8
-
8
-
8
-
Schools were never about learning or education, they were always about indoctrination and obedience. It's even written in the letters of the people that invented the current education system.
The "education" system produces useless people in 12-20 years... and wastes your youth. You stop being young at the age of 23-25.
If kids weren't neglected to the "education" system, but instead specialized in one engineering field, or one trade, or law, or commerce after elementary school(starting at age 10-11), by the time they are 14-18 they'd be a highly skilled and knowledgeable experts in the field/sub-field they were specialized in and would be able to work on a medium position.
Not to mention that school and university diplomas should NOT be mandatory to get a job, because there is no real world knowledge and skill behind them.
I have many friends, acquaintances and people I know that did just that and many started working an engineering job during high school and many now earn 3-5x times the average salary at 21-23 years old without going to university.
And to solve the low birth rates, we need to remove social security and pensions. So people have to be taken care of by their children and then they'd be highly motivated to NOT neglect their children to the "education" system and to push them to be strong, knowledgeable and skilled as early as possible.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
Yeah graduating from school and university is not an accomplishment it's BS, because there is no real world knowledge or skill learnt there. On paper there is, but in reality there isn't, yes even in STEM, trust me I know.
The "education" system produces useless people in 12-20 years... and wastes your youth. You stop being young at the age of 23-25.
If kids weren't neglected to the "education" system, but instead specialized in one engineering field, or one trade, or law, or commerce after elementary school(starting at age 10-11), by the time they are 14-18 they'd be a highly skilled and knowledgeable experts in the field/sub-field they were specialized in and would be able to work on a medium position.
Not to mention that school and university diplomas should NOT be mandatory to get a job, because there is no real world knowledge and skill behind them.
I have many friends, acquaintances and people I know that did just that and many started working an engineering job during high school and many now earn 3-5x times the average salary at 21-23 years old without going to university.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
The problem is that we are not free, we are more limited than in the past 80-100 years... Governments are more authoritarian than they were after the fall of monarchies or even before that.
There are more restrictions than ever, more bureaucracy and even unofficial aristocrasy(it's quite official).
We are raised to be weak, incapable and unhealthy. They think that if they give us a room, food, clothing and toys that they are being excellent parents.
And you can no longer just get good at a skill and find a job, you need to waste your youth, 12-20 years of your life in the authoritarian institutions which produce useless people and damage you physiologically and mentally, kill any motivation, inspiration and individualism and make you conform like a soul dead, mindless drone...
And with mega corporations being a thing for the past 30-35 years you can't compete with them...
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
+Quickshot Gaming
well I can give you a quick view of the now and near past.
Currently, the current gen CPUs are coffeelake and zen+, IPC-wise Coffeelake and Ryzen have the same integer IPC of 4 integer instructions per second, with Ryzen being bottlenecked by its decoders, with good optimization it can do 5 integer instructions per cycle and with perfect optimization it can have 6 integer instructions per cycle, but due to Intel's market dominance in the past 10 years and to this day and their 95-100% same architecture every generation, most compilers, programming languages, game engines and software is optimized for their architectures, which gives them an advantage. Ryzen has 33% higher 128 bit AVX SSE IPC than coffeelake per core, which is the most used FP media instruction, the same 256 bit AVX instruction IPC which is become more popular as time passes, but still not present in most software and 33% slower 512-bit AVX IPC, almost unused except in benchmarks and custom vendor software. Zen+ has 50% slower L1 cache, but 25% faster L3 and 33% faster L2 cache than Coffelake. So overall Ryzen practically has the same or better IPC when optimized for, but that is not the case. Coffelake has 20-30% higher clock speeds, which gives it lead over Ryzen along with the default intel optimization.
Another downside is that intel CPUs use thermal paste between the heat spreader and chip and heat like ovens, unless delided and using liquid metal. And then Intel is quite more expensive due to their bigger die sizes, AMD's "infinity fabric" -> Multi-Chip Modules(MCM) makes many small dies be connected and act as a single CPU which gives big yields.
Having 1 big die per wafer with 10% defects on the wafer = 0 working chips -> 100% failure rate. Having 10 smaller dies per wafer with 10% defects on the wafer = potentially 9 working chips -> 10% failure rate. Just an example.
Buy whichever is cheaper though, which comes to be ryzen currently. Both game more than well enough to matter as long as you get an r5 or coffeelake i5, but Ryzen will be better at productivity workloads and will cost less, heat less.
GPUs currently are Pascal and Polaris/Vega. Pascal achieves 15% better per mm^2 die size performance due to better clock speeds, IPC is different between them, but cuda cores are bigger. Due to cuda cores, being castrated stream processors and not being able to do many compute instructions, relying on optimization and the CUDA language to make up for the lack of those instructions Nvidia GPUs are worse at raw compute performance than AMD GPUs without massive optimisations and sometimes no matter what, but CUDA cores also consume less power. Drivers are currently equally as good, but AMD seems to have slightly better ones in terms of feature quality. Also Nvidia has better delta color compression, which allows for more Vram to be used at the same time with less memory bandwidth.
Buy whichever is cheaper, which currently is Nvidia due to the market price shit due to miners and in general Pascal is a better architecture than Polaris, which ended AMD's 8-9 year long superiority in GPU architecture. Since the hd 3000 series, until Nvidia released Pascal, AMD had vastly superior architecture to Nvidia, but people still bought Nvidia... brand recognition, marketing and ignorance ruined the GPU market...
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@tulegenov7431 I have over half a dozen female cousins, I've done all the shopping, fashion, photography, dancing, growing flowers(and beans and such), sewing, badminton, pottery. I don't mind most(dancing and shopping isn't for me at all, neither is traveling), but they are not things I look forward to, I wouldn't do them myself. I do like handball though.
I'm always open for activities.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Can you give an example of mysoginy that is being more and more prevalent?
All the men around me have the same problem you have with men, but with women. We are so incompatible with them, that if you remove sex and children, if people didn't have reproductive functions and were just people(no man or woman), we'd never spend time together with them.
Also do you go for men that make your "knees shake", are charismatic, good looking, tall, etc, etc? Those are the equivalent of a beautiful, very easy and seductive woman. Men know not to be with such women, why won't women learn that mr. charismatic, strong, tall, dark and handsome is to be avoided? If a man is very charismatic, elequent and knows exactly what you want, then that man has been with many women. Men aren't born with those traits.
A person who has been with many partners means two things. Either that he/she wasn't good enough for a lot of people and there is something deeply flawed in that person, or that he/she screwed over a lot of people and best case scenario wasted their time, worst case can be pretty bad. But sure he/she will tick all your instinctual and cognitive boxes.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
If you asked them if a 100 year old grandpa is hot, they'd obviously say no, which immediately shows you, and more important them, that there is an expiration date of being attractive. It's not instant, it's gradual. They just have to accept that after the age of 28-29 they have no decreased in attractiveness. It goes for men too, you can see that they have degraded by 30 compared to 20-25, but women don't seem to mind it.
People start experiencing senescence at the age of 23-25, a.k.a the degradation of the body with aging, meaning that by 30 you've been dying for 5-7 years, thus you've been losing attractiveness for 5-7 years, let alone at 35 or 40. At 40 you've been degrading and dying almost half of your life.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Geography is extremely unimportant for 99% of people, almost everything learnt in schools is useless information.
The "education" system produces useless people in 12-20 years... and wastes your youth. You stop being young at the age of 23-25.
If kids weren't neglected to the "education" system, but instead specialized in one engineering field, or one trade, or law, or commerce after elementary school(starting at age 10-11), by the time they are 14-18 they'd be a highly skilled and knowledgeable experts in the field/sub-field they were specialized in and would be able to work on a medium position.
Not to mention that school and university diplomas should NOT be mandatory to get a job, because there is no real world knowledge and skill behind them.
I have many friends, acquaintances and people I know that did just that and many started working an engineering job during high school and many now earn 3-5x times the average salary at 21-23 years old without going to university.
And to solve the low birth rates, we need to remove social security and pensions. So people have to be taken care of by their children and then they'd be highly motivated to NOT neglect their children to the "education" system and to push them to be strong, knowledgeable and skilled as early as possible.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@toast_on_toast1270 The people who land their dream jobs at 16 are outliers, but they didn't magically just happen to do it, they did it by focusing on the mastering the skill they needed for that job by NOT going to school as much as possible so they could master their field instead.
And the context of the statistic matters, most people who go to university are who want to earn more money, study harder and work harder, compared to people who don't. It's that simple.
Most people who finish university don't even work in the field they studied.
People need to realize that you start aging at 24-25, you start dying at that age and you are old by the age of 30. This dumb idea from 60 years ago that 30 is the new 20 or 40 is the new 20 is just stupid...
I don't want to waste my youth, which I already did, just to come out useless.
And unviersities on paper teach you everything and you come out a god of knowledge and skill... on paper... in reality you come out next to useless or useless...
Companies in the STEM field hire purely on skill and knowledge... My friends have HR friends who say that they reject more Masters and Bachelors than people without all of them are engineers(well not officially).
Google, Amazon and 27 other big companies will no longer take into a count university diplomas after 2025 and have oppened their own courses, because they noticed that people without degrees tend to do better than people with,
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Mat Smith not since 2005, until 2005 TDP and power consumption, were pretty much 1:1, but due to the technology/process node getting so small, it became harder to dissipate heat from hardware, because of various differenty factors, thus you need a better cooler to cool a gpu that usually consumes less power.
For example AMD's latest GPUs and CPUs consume about 20-30% less power than the rated TDP, my fx 6300 never goes over 60 Watts on full load with a stress test, let alone in games, where it hovers around 40-45 Watts, depending on the game. Same goes for Intel CPUs, the i5 6600k for example has 91W TDP, but the CPU itself consumes about 50 Watts(can't remember the exact number).
TDP stands for Thermal Deisgn Power, in other words how much heat a given hardware can output and how good of a cooler you need to cool it, both measured in watts.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@jam99 They don't want to destroy it on purpose, but they do. While people who work essential to our survival and prosperity jobs are under-awarded/undercompensated. Plumbers, carpenters, ditch diggers, miners, farmers, sewers(Seamstress?), road layers, construction workers, all other similar essential and productive jobs are treated like crap.
That's why the supply and demand model is outdated and needs to go. If you limit human interactions through laws, you should limit economic prospect as well.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Ok, so let's look at this. I live in a small country, where if people move at all it is to the capital or three biggest cities apart from the capital.
But at the same time, from 1990-2024 we have gone from almost 11 million to 6.5 million population(and that's counting people abroad), while we have built 3-4x more homes in every major city.
Yet in the 90s the median home was 2-3x median yearly salaries and was 71-74m^2, while since 2021 the median home has been 9-12x median salaries and 48-51m^2.
All of our major cities are half or less the population they were 30-35 years ago, except the capital, which is 100 000 fewer people than 10 years ago.
Again tons of apartment building a being built, tons of houses, they are almost all next to empty, 0 interior, gray empty boxes.
What happens is corporations and rich people buy them out or straight up build them and then use an algorithm, with data about the area's income, to technically price fix the rents/prices to where they cost what is on the edge of affordable for 2x median salaries to get a mortgage or rent, in the age where people are most alone. And it's legal, because they are using algorithms for it and not technically colluding.
Also we don't build houses from cardboard, it's all steel reinforced concrete and brick that last no less than 100 years.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Yes.
Otherwise: Dakar, Targa, Speedster, Cabriolet, RSR, Carrera T, Carrera S, S/T, GT3, GT3 RS, GTS, Turbo, Sport Classic, Turbo S Exclusive, GT2, GT2 RS, Carrera 4(S).
4
-
The purpose of life is to survive and reproduce. Hedonism leads to death and decay.
Also when you get old and retire/can't work anymore, nobody owes you production, except your kids, even if you are a billionaire.
And the biggest reason for dysfunctional families is people marrying based on their feelings and not actual common values, world views, lifestyle and interests.
And yeah old people should be put in nursing homes if they actually need constant care.
Also if you think having kids sucks, well with the low birth rates, you will have to take care of old retired people, because there will not be enough people in nursing homes to take care of them.
Right now there are 2-4x working people per 1x retired person, but in 40-60 years with the current birth rates, there will be 1x working person for 4-7x retired old people and you'll have to take care of them... Enjoy...
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
As it stands the current education system produces weak, stupid useless people while wasting 12-20 years of people's lives and their youth. Goes doubly so for STEM.(Ask me how I know)
If kids were specialized in one engineering field, OR one trade OR law, OR commerce, starting from the age of 11-12, by the time they are 16-20 they would be highly skilled and knowledgeable experts in their (sub)field and would be able to work confidently at a good position from the get go, even if they start at a lower one.
They would be able to choose where they work instead of sending their CV to 1000 companies hoping one would hire them.
I have two dozen friends, acquaintances and people I know that did what I described above, ditched school as much as possible, never went to university and they got an engineering job either during high school or straight out of high school. By 22-24 they were earning 3-7x the average salary. How did they do that? Well by going to Private Courses and most importantly Self-Educating while not wasting their time in school. Only one had wealthy parents, the rest weren't even middle class.
So in conclusion: Yes it is a good thing, so that future generations don't suffer. Hopefully school goes along with it. Unless they reinvent the education system to actually make you a professional expert in a field within 8-10 years.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
What she misses is that even if you have eggs, if you get old enough you may not be able to get pregnant or sustain being pregnant. I have relatives, who tried having a baby from the age of 38 all the way up to I think 50, and having eggs wasn't a problem, they did everything, freezing them, IVF, and everything esle that exists, spent a small fortune, but no, it didn't work. And they didn't have that problem when they were younger..
Now if she doesn't want kids, that's not a problem for her, but don't spread misinformation for people who do want to have kids.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@toast_on_toast1270 Or you can start doing what you enjoy at around the age of 10-12 and by 18 you can be a highly skilled and knowledgeable expert in that field and you can work it on medium level, it would also help if you didn't go to school, so you don't waste 6-8 hours of your day learning next to nothing about 10-15 different subjects.
Or we can reform the education system so you learn 2-3x subjects in just one sphere, for 2-3x hours each a day, every day of the week and by the time you are 18 you will be a highly skilled and knowledgeable expert in a field and would be able to work in that field on a medium level.
Realistically most people can barley get a bottom position job after university(unless they self-educated way beyond the university corriculum), IF they studied in STEM or Finance, Statistics and Accounting. For medicine and law you just get hired with a diploma though.Those who study sociology, theater, English, art, liberal art and such usually can't even find a job in their field, that's why the accronym is STEAL.
3
-
3
-
@toast_on_toast1270 Well because statistically artists struggle a ton without any debt, let alone if you are in the USA and you have debt.
I love art, music and films, but people become depressed from stress of not being able to pay the bills and get the groceries. That type of stress is very bad and even deadly.
Now if you are a minimalist(which I personally consider myself 75-80% minimalist, so not fully minimalistic) then it's great, you don't have a lot of things to worry about. You can easily become an artist.
When it comes to the "education" system, I just had examples of regular people around me, who just didn't follow the system and had their lives setup by the time they were 18-20(when they had worked for 2-3 years) and they are absolutely living the life right now, they have their own apartments, they travel, they play musical instruments and such.
Whereas most people barely get their lives together until their late 20s to early 30s, some cases into their 40s.
I hate the fact that the "education" system wastes 12-20 years of our lives, our best years on top of that and in the end, if you didn't self-educate light years beyond it, you come out next to useless from it...
When in reality you need 2-5 years of dedicaded specialisation to become a highly skilled expert in a field. And you can do that from a young age.
Wouldn't it be wondeful if at 16-18 you started working your dream job and at a good position from the get go, not some internship or junior bottom position?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@dubstepXpower I disagree, action RPGs have great gameplay, the witcher(specifically 2), mass effect and dragon age were amazing without a story, they have a fun gameplay, systems, progression and enemies.
And it can also be turn based, Strategy based, etc, doesn't matter. Gameplay matters the most.
The stories are just another layer, but I can play an action RPG, or any RPG without a story(FromSoftware games, old RPGs), but I can't play an RPG without good gameplay.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
It boggles my mind why people have not revolted against the "education" sytem.
To quote myself from my own comment:
The "education" system has never been good, it has always produced next to useless people or straight up useless people, apart from potentially teaching you to read, write and calculate, if your parents were neglectful.
It's just that in the past it didn't matter. Most (at the time) high skill jobs in the past could be learnt for 1 month to 1 year of on the job training, while now those jobs are either automated, gone or have become infinitely more complex. So now you need to actually have a good 1-3 years of self-education and/or private courses to get a job, and schools and universities are absolutely useless.
After university, if you haven't self-educated way beyond the corriculum and unless it's medicine or law where you are mostly hired based on the piece of paper, most people can barely get the bottom position job in the field they studied if they can get a job at all.
In reality if you start self-educating in an engineering field, finance, law or a trade at the age of 10-12, by the age of 16-18 you will be a highly skilled and knowledgeable expert that could work in the field(and subfield) you studied on a medium level. I would be even faster if you didn't waste 7-9 hours a day in school...
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@angelicadickson8666 that's why we need a new system, instead of recycling and adjusting old ones. If the USSR and USA got something right is that the other's systems sucked.
And people being stuck in this better or worse mindset is a huge problem. Better is meaningless, it has to be GOOD and no system so far has been good.
And the biggest technological progress was done during wars for wars, while the best prosperity is achieved after war by the winners and least affected. The USA became so powerful exactly because it was on the winning side of WW2, while at the same time being untouched, while the rest of the world was in ruins.
Since WW2 we have only improved upon technology, evolved it and repurposed it, but we haven't had a technological revolution since.
And I'm not advocating wars, but those are the cold facts. When people work to achieve something not for money, as money is not a factor in war, they do best.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The education system wastes 12-20 years of your life, your youth while producing weak, stupid useless people. That goes doubly so for STEM(Ask me how I know). It's only useful for Law and Medicine and that's only because they are state mandated.
You would learn infinitely more through self-education and private courses. If kids were specialized starting at the age of 10-12 in One engineering field, Or one trade, or law or commerce, by the time they are 16-20 years old, they'd be highly skilled and knowledgeable experts that would be able to work a middle position in their (sub)sphere and wouldn't be desperately handing out their CVs to 1000 companies hoping that one would hire them.
I have almost two-dozen friends, acquaintances and people I know that didn't go to university, or even before finishing high-school, got engineering jobs paying 3-6x the average salary by the age of 22-25. How? They skipped school as much as possible without getting evicted, while going to private courses and self-educating. And they aren't the exception for a random reason, they are the exception, because they didn't follow the system.
My best friend got a software engineering job after 10th grade(before finishing high school), two more friends got a network engineer job after 1tth grade, another one got a system admin job after 10th grade, two more friends got software engineering jobs straight out of highschool. Another friend got an automotive engineering job 1 year after graduation as he needed to get integrated in Germany. And the list goes on.
3
-
Radford Tataryn Same here, I'm rational, but I don't know about the US, but here in Europe Ford has always come on top when it comes to quality compared to GM and Fiat-Chrystler.
And I'm strictly talking about cars, no idea about trucks, not many people buy pickups here.
Fiat-Chrystler and GM(in the form of Opel, which is basically a Chevrolet, though GM sold Opel 2 years ago and basically left the european market) are literally on the bottom of the quality statistics only BMW might be worse depending on the year and model...
Whereas the Fiesta and Mondeo are usually high up there, top 6-7, usually behind Toyotas, Mazdas, Hondas, Seats and Skodas and Hyundais.
3
-
3
-
Nah, we are not all the same at 18. Successful people around me started at the age of 7-11, their parents knew what's up, even though they weren't rich, and instead of forcing them to stay in school, the made them actually learn real life skills that would net you a job, regardless of your age, degrees and all that crap. My best friend became a software engineer at the age of 16. How? His dad made him learn programming since the age of 8-9, he skipped school all the time, so that he could actually learn something. Same with a few more friends, but they started at around 14.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@mazenmady1136 not at all... god is meaningless and his meaning is not objective, doesn't matter that he created us... this instant respect and obedience towards your creator is dumb as hell... of course, all this is assuming there is an invisible man in the sky. Also according to the bible, hell is a better option than hell, so go do bad stuff.
I mean in hell it says you suffer, but how come? You have no body, it's dead, you are some spirit or if you are materialized somehow, who gives a fuck, your dead. While in heaven you are brainwashed(can't think of sin, bad things and so on) and forced to bow down day in and day out. So no free will no free thinking, meh, hell for me pls.
What am I doing... applying logic to the bible... what is wrong with me...
3
-
@dimensiondoor2738
the cause is happiness, pointlessly seeking happiness... you are seeking a drug... happiness is dopamine an addictive hormone our brain releases to makes feel good... no different than the drugs that either directly makes us feel good through similar in structure to dopamine chemical or that makes our brain release more dopamine...
And please read the entire bible... I've seen it many times, the moment someone who is open-minded actually reads the bible, they become an atheist... it's horse shit written by people for people, to manipulate and control them, in time where people were fragile and weak, afraid and seeking comfort... there is no god... and worse if there is one, that god should be destroyed, it's an evil, maniacal, egotistical god, all the sins that the bible is supposed to preach that god doesn't uphold. Tyrant of the tyrants. Truly evil... go find an UNCENSORED, Unedited, Uncut version of the bible, read its stories and its guidance and teachings... you'll see.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@neonreign2988 Well the corolla is still one of the best selling cars though.
AWD has nothing to do with the vehicle being an SUV or a Sedan.
And SUVs have objective disadvantages, while all their advantages have been reduced to nothing thanks to regulations and just overall trends in the market over the years.
They are no good off road(most of them, hummers are still good, but they are hummers), they aren't spacious, they don't offer you anything, they aren't tall at all, they are low nowadays, they just have bigger tires.
They don't even have big trunks, they are not spacious because they need extra thick pillars and crash protection due to their weight, their visibility is awful and a lot of them are cramped for such huge vehicles. Especially the Jeep Grand Cherokee(or however you spell that) and the G-Class.
Then we get into the negatives they've always had of being too big for cities, heavy with poor handling, terrible fuel consumption, everything is more expensive about them.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The education system wastes 12-20 years of people's lives, their youth and produces weak, stupid useless people. That goes doubly so for STEM(ask me how I know).
If kids were specialized in one engineering field, or one trade, or law, or commerce starting from the age of 10-12, through private courses and Self-education, by the time they are 16-20 years old, they'd be highly skilled and knowledgeable experts. They would be able to work in their field on a medium level, even if they start at an entry level one. Instead they come out of universities and they can't do anything(if they solely relied on the education system). They have to desperately submit their CVs to 1000 companies, hoping one would hire them and then start actually learning for the first time in their lives.
I have almost two-dozen friends, acquaintances and people I know that didn't go to university, or even before finishing high-school, got engineering jobs paying 3-7x the average salary by the age of 22-23. How? They skipped school as much as possible without getting evicted, while going to private courses and self-educating. And they aren't the exception for a random reason, they are the exception, because they didn't follow the system.
My best friend got a software engineering job after 10th grade(before finishing high school), two more friends got a network engineer job after 1tth grade, another one got a system admin job after 10th grade, two more friends got software engineering jobs straight out of highschool. Another friend got an automotive engineering job 1 year after graduation as he needed to get integrated in Germany. And the list goes on.
What those people have in common is that their parents started specializing them in their fields through private courses and self-education at the age of 8-12 instead of rotting away in school and the second is that by the age of 22-24 they were earning 3-7x the average salary...
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@adoseofnirvana3090 Agreed, from what i've noticed, when it comes to both boobs and butts, the shape is the most important thing(talking natural here, silicone boobs and whatever fake butts are 95% of the time ugly and just terrible).
And when it comes to ratios, I think that the butt should have the same girth/circumference as the underbust and not the bust itself.
And when it comes to shape for the boobs, I think that saggy boobs or boobs are the worst, the underboob should be visible or almost visible when standing straight up.
Or in other words if she is on all fours, the boobs shouldn't look like pendulums/bells swinging from a narrow point to a big bottom, but remain their nice, plump and round shape.
I'm good at objectifying, so give me a cookie :P
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@InvasionAnimation I'm a programmer btw, and I've been a PC geek since kindergarten, so to me I got the job I've always wanted from since I was a kid. One of the two, it was either micro-architecture of software engineering, since I don't live in the US and the few other countries where I can work the former, the latter is what I do.
And it's great and my job is super chill. No harsh deadlines, no micro managing, a good mentor. Almost German net pay(-10 to 15%) in a country that is much cheaper to live in than Germany.
I really can't complain at all about my job.
I can only complain about me not being able to make myself keep studying to get even better at programming much faster.
And yet I have gotten very... I don't even know the word, but my brain has given up, rationally I haven't, but subconsciously I'm so done, I can't really function at more than 25% capacity.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@sleepyherbs6303 You forget that everybody, literally everybody had slaves around the world, until Europeans came in and stopped them, mainly the British and the USA because they were a global empire.
Big misconception is that slavery was based on racism, which it wasn't. Rich and powerful enslaved the weak and poor, it's simple.
And back in the day less than 1.5% of people had slaves, while nowadays in Africa many more do.
Hell the word slave comes from the word slav, and I'm a slav and I'm as white as snow, but the people in my country were enslaved for 482 years by Turks before that for 172 years by Byzantines, before that by the Roman Empire, part of my people had to run away from very Eastern Europe for many as possible to escape enslavement by the Tartars. Then if you look at the Pols and Rus they were no better historically either...
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@kevinclydeeguia2543 Well sacrifices have to be made. I don't think it will necessarily mean war. And not all countries are overpopulated, at the same time the more overpopulated ones will lose more people(percentage-wise it should be about the same).
And China, the US, India, Japan and others will all adapt. We have been in overproduction for a very long time, although maybe now we aren't due to the pandemic, still, we will be again.
And automatization becomes more and more prevalent as well, so fewer and fewer people have to work. This also removes mid-skill jobs, while high skill jobs are getting more and more complex and production volume is less and less dependant on the number of people working as machines can have adjustable output.
I'm no expert, though, I'm just connecting dots together.
The thing I know for sure is we need fewer people and better spread out population within countries themselves and globally as a whole.
In the US the majority are on the coasts or in Texas. In Europe, the top 5 most populated cities usually have between 50-80% of the population. It's just insane.
We should also push for a change in values to be more family-oriented too, for the longest time people have only cared about material things and wealth as a whole and that has proven to make people live worse and have a negative effect on people's psychology and physiology(for those who overwork themselves).
2
-
2
-
2
-
@chicksdiggit9239 It's called terriotorialism, not insecurity.
And let's picture this: Imagine you have 20 super cars. And you take one of park one of your super cars outside. And suddenly 2-3 dudes start trying to hit it, and try to open it and steal it.
Now you know that there is almost no chance of them stealing the car is next to none, with immobilizer, locks and everything. You still wouldn't let them try would you?
It's the same.
And men and women are equal in terms of rights, in terms of intellect, but socially and physically men and women are apples and oranges, not equal, can't be equal, because you are comparing two different things, apples and oranges.
Why are the different? Different neurological patterns are hardwired and different amounts of different hormones are present. It's scientifically proven.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ato96 Yep, it's hard.
From what I've read, online dating should be the way to go for women, since the vast majority of app users are men, so you can pick and choose.(Haven't used one myself, I like irl interactions, not online ones)
But if you want an early bird, gymrat, sober, who isn't deep into politics, go early to the gym, I know cuz I am one. Still flirting in the gym isn't the best, but that's your best bet. But IDK what you mean by plant-based.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@chrisknight880 Up to the age of 15-16 or so(10 years ago), girls were absolutely willing to do many more activities. Play different games, even some sports, go on hikes, etc, etc. After that they pretty much thought of it as either lame or "man hobbies" and with time they ended up with very few hobbies.
Again that's not all women, but seriously it can't be every woman I meet if it wasn't common...
But it wasn't just girls, women were more up to it. I have a dozen female cousins most of which older than me or the same age as me and I saw the change in them too... I have no freaking idea what happened.
While guys either remained the same, or the desperate for relationships(or sex) ones became the same, since they tried to force being relatable to women/girls, while hiding the few hobbies they still have/had.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@frozennorthwoods4401 First of all, Degrees should be removed or forbidden from being asked for by companies. Schools and especially universities should be optional.
Companies should hire based on skills alone.
And yes, kids should be specialized since the age of 10-12 in one engineering field, OR one trade, OR law OR commerce, so that by the time they are 18 they are highly skilled and knowledgeable experts and can work on a medium position in their field.
So if let's say you want to become a software developer, after elementary school, you have just 1-3x Core subjects, in this case Programming, Math and English(for non-english countries).
You have programming 3-4x classes a day 4x times a week, Math 1x class a day 5x times a week and English 1x class a day, 3x times a week.
Then you have 4x non-core subjects: Dietary class(yes we have to teach people how to eat, sad but true), Home Skills, Personal Finance, Personal Health.
Each of these classes will be had once(1x) a day, 2x times a week, for 1-2x semesters each.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@supersaiyaman11589 As I said initially there will be negatives, but this is the price to pay sadly. Many actions have reversible consequences. The other option is for the status quo to continue.
We should be thinking long term, not short term.
The reliance on the government, has made companies powerful, while people weak, lazy, useless, unhealthy, ignorant, foolish and on top of it all isolated, divided and all alone.
The government is very important, but at the same time it should be a lot more limited.
As I said with no pensions and social securities, this would mean that the parents would have an incentive to have more kids, like 3-4 for example, which would also solve the plummeting birth rates.
Plus in the future parents will be much better people and much better parents to their children.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@graceharrington4560 Divorce rates of all marriages is 53-54%, divorce rates of marriages under 10 years(2008-2018) are close to 70%(67-68%) and over 80% of these divorces are initiated by women and almost all of them are no fault divorces, that is the majority yes.
Having to suppress yourself so you avoid being shamed is also a big reason, no wonder testosterone levels are falling down.
If you let yourself be a man, to be dominant, aggressive, ruthless, masculine and energetic you are labelled an oppressor, bully, misogynist, evil. If you are chill and let be, then you are a loser...
Women wanting the top 20% of men, even the woman in this video said it, is also a problem.
Women having no skills to raise the children, while also not wanting a man to stay at home while they are the sole bread winner is also a problem. And the ones that do, lose respect for their husbands and grow resentful.
close to 90% of women who start outearning their husbands leave them...
No good reason? Not the majority? Stats say otherwise.
And again women want meant to be what they think a man should be.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@sandycharlton1707 yeah no, economies aren't real either, just like currency they only work because people believe in them, pretend they are real and accept them.
And when I say accept them, I mean they are forced to accept them, well everyone born in the past few thousand years... I doubt many would accept them willingly, except for the people who invented and spread the concept in the first place and the first generation to accept it...
And we have to accept it, just like laws, otherwise the group of people with guns, tasers and bats will come and murder you, or even worse lock you in a room for the rest of your life... Freedom!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The "education" system has never been good, it has always produced next to useless people or straight up useless people, apart from potentially teaching you to read, write and calculate, if your parents were neglectful.
It's just that in the past it didn't matter. Most (at the time) high skill jobs in the past could be learnt for 1 month to 1 year of on the job training, while now those jobs are either automated, gone or have become infinitely more complex. So now you need to actually have a good 1-3 years of self-education and/or private courses to get a job, and schools and universities are absolutely useless.
After university, if you haven't self-educated way beyond the corriculum and unless it's medicine or law where you are mostly hired based on the piece of paper, most people can barely get the bottom position job in the field they studied if they can get a job at all.
In reality if you start self-educating in an engineering field, finance, law or a trade at the age of 10-12, by the age of 16-18 you will be a highly skilled and knowledgeable expert that could work in the field(and subfield) you studied on a medium level. I would be even faster if you didn't waste 7-9 hours a day in school.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
+IIorTA toN
Intel CPUs have proven time and time again, that they have worse 0.1% and 1% FPS lows in comparison to Ryzen 5 1500x and above(due to Ryzen having huge and fast cache pools), which is what matters, AVG FPS is meaningless, when you achieve it mainly when you are NOT in action and usually just walking/driving/simply moving...
And I prefer Quality > Performance, thus no intel toothpaste CPU that heats like an oven, with tons of bugs for me, thank you very much. Not to mention that a R5 1500x already matches it's gaming performance(and exceeds in 0.1% and 1% lows with good RAM) and productivity performance, when they are clocked at the same clock speeds and a Ryzen can easily be overclocked to 3.9Ghz since Ryzen Runs cool and Kabylake can NOT be overclocked in this AIO... so yeah.
Plus I couldn't give a damn about the difference, even if I were to look at the average FPS both the R5 1500x, R5 1400, R5 1600(X) and so on get over 120fps avg in games... why would I care if the i7 7700k got 140fps avg and an R5 1500x got a 130fps when it's all the same, except that again Ryzen has better 0.1% and 1% FPS lows.
Plus I'd cap the FPS at 60FPS since I do NOT need more and it would be awesome for the system to run really cool while gaming. And for work Ryzen dominates, which is primarily what I do. 75% work/25% game.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The men that just want to get laid do you an excellent service if they just tell you that after one date, they are telling on themselves, just move forward to the next person, without sleeping with them. And the solution to dinner = sex to be eliminated for sure, is not to go for a dinner date. Go for a walk, go for coffee, seat on a bench, do some activity together. Get to know each other, be straight to the point if you actually like him, expect the same from him.
But from what I've noticed, women don't like any of those, it's always a dinner date or something of that sort, why?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@MonkeyDIvan Not true, and there is statistical data(which I can't link thanks to youtube deleting foreign site links) that shows that kids that grow in single parent households are much more likely to get screwed.
73-76%+ of prisoners come from single mother house holds, 70%+ of murderers are from single mother households, 63-68% of suicides are from single mother households, 70% of teenage pregnancies are from single mother households, 90%+ of homeless or ran away are from single mother households. People from single mother households are also more likely to be worse financially and on average earn 20-40% less.
64% of people who are emotionally stunted are from single father households, 71-73% of people who are alone and lonely are from single father house holds, 66-68% of people who are socially weak, awkward or disabled are from single father households.
And many more. If a single man or woman could do both roles, this wouldn't be the case. The problem is that you are viewing thsi as political, when it's practical and pragmatic. I'm the number one enemy of traditions, but this has nothing to do with traditions.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@joeswanson733 It takes time for changes to occur and in general, people naturally want to have children and back then there was no brainwashing against having children or a family.
And school only guarantees failure to below mediocrity, nothing more, nothing less. It's the people that self-educate light years ahead of the education system, from an early age that don't become failures.
I'm in a STEM university and I'm telling you, we are learning almost nothing about every subject we have and in the 3.5 years I've been to university we've gone through 60+ subjects... (biggest mistake of my life, I turned down 4 great jobs to get "educated")...
And my country's education system is ahead of Western Europe's and the USA's. What in western Europe is studied in the first 2 years of university, we here study it in grade 10 to 12, I know because I have friends and family in Germany, Austria, Netherlands, Canada, USA and Australia, plus I've watched Oxford's and Harvard's free lectures.
Not to mention that by the time you finish university you are 23-27, and you haven't even had a job yet... no way you are making a family...
You don't want to have kids after the age of 27-28, kids are not just born they are raised and you have to be able to help out with the grandkids too...
In the 12 years of school alone you can produce experts, let alone University.
Schools and universities to be fixed, so that they produce experts, or removed after the 4th grade.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Cube930 Die size is the cost factor, along with the R&D. Nvidia doesn't pay for performance, they pay for die size, because they buy wafers, not individual chips and the smaller the die size the more chips per wafer, the cheaper the chip is, on top of being more power efficient and requiring a cheaper PCB and cooling.
Performance is a byproduct, it's not a cost factor.
And in gneeral the definition for a mid-range chip, regardless if it's a CPU, GPU, ASIC, FGPA, Trigger, etc is a chip that is roughly half the reticle limit.
So far the reticle limit has been 858mm^2 for years, until they invent something isn't based on UV.
389mm^2 and 392mm^2 is roughly half the reticle limit of 858mm^2, considering you never want to hit said reticle limit, never go above 95% of it. I'd say both the rtx 3070 and 4080 are mid-range GPUs.
Just like the gtx 1080 was a sub-mid-range GPU that should have costed 350$ but instead costed 600-700$... And if you go and see Nvidia's financial reports from 2016-2017 you'll see that their profit margins were between 90 and 138%, which is why their stock prices exploded back then and this was before AI... The RTX 4000 is just as bad, if not worse than the gtx 1000 series.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@agentzapdos4960 You can always be strong and smart(knowledgeable and capable). And if you are smart, you will be rich enough.
If you are so weak that you can't live well without being born into wealth, you should hate your parents for neglecting you to the "education" system, which in 12-20 years produces weak, stupid useless people and wastes your youth. Goes doubly so for STEM.
If you start specializing kids, through courses and especially self-education, from the age of 11-12 in one engineering field, or one trade, or law or commerce, by the age of 16-20 they would be a highly skilled and knowledgeable experts in their (sub)field.
I know dozens of people, many of which friends and acquaintances, who by the age of 22-24 are now earning 3-7x the average salary. They ditched school as much as possible and went to private courses and most importantly self-educated themselves. And only one of them had rich parents, the rest weren't even "middle class".
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@58sportsuburban yup, nobody wants to do essential jobs anymore. Who cares that we have to eat or need raw materials. Pfff, let's all have an office job or be entrepreneurs and have our own business.
Metals, wood and other minerals mine themselves right? And food? That grows on trees, no need to have farmers. And asphalt roads make and maintain themselves of course, no need for road layers at all. And all these houses and big skyscrapers just appear out of thin air, construction workers? Pff, who needs those. And the whole sewage and water supply system have always been there, who needs plumbers? Welders, mechanics, carpenters, yeah we are too good for that aren't we? -_-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@asdfadf1904 many super heroes like Wonder Woman, the Flash, John Steward, Thor, Captian America, Hawkman, Tim Drake.
Gimli and legolas.
And in anime and video games there are tons.
Having a tragic backstory is just the easiest way to write a character and explain their flaws, but it's lazy. Otherwise you need to craft your story much more delicately with much more attention to detail, extra events and characters to show what the specific character is like, how he/she acts and what choices he/she makes. With some mentions or flashbacks of their earlier life.
Having an underdog gives you a blank slate and removes the need to have a backstory beyond what currently is motivating the character. Though usually they combine tragic with underdog nowadays for the strongest and yet laziest effect.
Having an evil character turn good is also the easiest way to win the audience and change the variables within the plot.
Those are not the only way to write characters.
There can be an ambitious character, proud character, greedy character, selfish or selfless, and this would allow the character to not be so black and white. Sometimes doing things that would beneift themself, other times helping those they want to help, etc, etc.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@zonger5537 What you want to be true can NOT be true, that's why it's called an ideal. It can only work in a perfect world. You are eliminating the human factor from the equation, people's psychology doesn't work like that and people would not allow for that to happen, that's why the eastern european regimes failed and were never what they were supposed to be.
Also Horizontal power structures suck, I'm not going to be rewarded the same if I do 10x better job than someone else.
Big Companies would naturally die out, due to their management stupidity if the government didn't save them every time they had a mishap. Quite literally right now every billion-dollar company would have died multiple times over the course of the decades they've been alive if the governments didn't bail them out. The most recent example being Intel, AMD and all chip giants getting hundreds of billions of dollars and euro from the USA, Canada and the EU, I think it was this year, or last year. Also the reason why there are only US 3 car companies left in the USA is because they were the only ones getting bailouts every time there was a financial crisis in the USA... the list goes on.
Not a single monopoly has been created without the help of a government(or multiple governments). And all the regulations are in favor of big businesses, while they make it impossible to start your own business. Every time the government make a fee for big businesses, they are making it for all businesses, not just big ones and that kills micro and small business who can't afford it and destroy the chance of people starting their own business, because they have to go through a ton of legal crap and a ton of fees and certifications and all that none-sense.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@penguinmonk7661 Yes STEM, because those are actually real fields and they teach you jack squat about anything...
They produce useless people that can barely get an internship, which is pathetic, because internships and junior position should be there to just walk you around the company, their projects and let you pick one, not to actually start learning once you start working...
The solution is to start specializing kids from the age of 11-12 through self-education and private courses in on engineering field, or one trade, or law or commerce and by the age of 16-20 people would be highly skilled and knowledgeable experts being able to work on medium positions in companies and being juniors/interns for a month or two just to get to know the company and their projects. I have two dozen friends, acquaintances, family friends and people I know who did exactly that and by the age of 16-18 they had an engineering job and by the age of 22-23 were earning 2-4x the average salary.
How? Again they started at the age of 8-13(most 11-13) going to private courses and self-educating, while skipping as much school as possible not to get expelled.
Of course I'm not ripping at the social studies/sciences, they are all made up crap, so no matter how much you learn and what not, you are going to be worthless. Psychology is the only exception I suppose and not 100%. I'm mad at STEM and school for producing useless people in real fields... Ask me how I know that STEM is worthless, just ask... -_-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@F4c2a I personally never care much about housing, it's an alright feature to me, but it has no actual gameplay, I myself am not someone who shows off, so it serves me no purpose, but I do agree that there should be housing if enough people want it.
To me the only thing missing from dragonflight is a new equivalent of the mage tower, brawler's guild, horrific visions and such. Otherwise to me dragonflight is the best expansion to date, and I've played since early TBC.
Also from all the MMOs I've played, WoW has had the most frequent big contnet updates, WoW's content draught is regular content release in GW2 and ESO. BDO isn't much better either.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@oceanhedonist265 well I'm doing very well, but see I care about the state of the world and right now and for the past decades it's been a broken world, that is just tearing itself down.
Socially we are getting worse and worse.
Economically we are getting worse and worse due to the economic system that is outdated and biased.
This is exactly what this video is about, people only care if they are doing well. And you are doing well then it means that everything is good and that all who have it bad or worse are to entirely blame themselves for that, when it's not entirely their fault for that.
And that stupid notion of getting a high paying job, when the high paying jobs are not jobs that are essential to our survival and society(except for doctors). A big portion of the low paid jobs are the backbone of life. Farmers, plumbers, welders, miners, those who sew clothes, those who get the materials for everything to be turned into a product in the first place.
Those people support the world and they are getting the end of the stick.
If everybody just went for the top-paying jobs, humanity would die out. At least we are in the process of automatization, but we won't have full automatization in the next half-century for sure and until then, people who are keeping the world going should be well compensated.
And that's the problem, the supply and demand principle that is flawed. Many of these low skill workers make their companies millions and billions and they should be paid proportionally to what they earn the company. Just like a company that gets contracted for a bigger company gets paid proportionally to what they earn the bigger company.
Of course jobs like cashiers, waiters, piccolos and such are useless made-up crap.
But people don't like to think about those things...
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
And everyone has the curse of the "education" system. It wastes 12-20 years of people's lives and wastes their youth, while producing weak, stupid useless people. This goes doubly so for STEM.
If kids were specialized through private courses and most importantly self-education, from the age of 12, in one engineering field, or one trade, or law or commerce, by the age of 16-20 they would be highly skilled and knowledgeable experts who would be able to work at a medium level position in their (sub)fields.
I know a few dozen people, many of which close friends and acquaintances, that by the age of 22-24 are earning 3-7x the average salary, by ditching school as much as possible and doing what I described above.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@goldwinger5434 Yeah right, lack of connections, lack of upbringing, lack of opportunities as well due to the lack of wealth. Schools and universities are useless and I do mean actual engineering degrees and in the US you can't even get one without going into debt, but that's a whole different story.
On top of that, the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer, despite the poor working more advanced jobs than ever and harder than ever, and longer than in the past 80 years and soon it will be longer than ever.
Because the rich avoid taxes through tax deductions and all sorts of evasions, they snowball and snowball. At the same time, they take away money from the economy and circulation and profit much, much more than the growth of the economy...
And their investment in the stock market is almost always buying stocks from another stock trader, not from the company so they don't invest extra money in the company, just get ownership and potentially dividends.
On top of that starting, your own business in most spheres now requires a lot of money, the mentality of people to want to work only for the biggest companies means that small, medium and even smaller-big businesses can't grow and expand.
So you basically have to luck out to succeed on top of putting at least 80 hours of hard work a week for your entire life...
Basically, the chances are almost comparable to the chances of winning the loterry and are approaching them with every decade.
The other option is to invest and hope nothing goes wrong, but yeah right. And then spend your life accumulating compound interest and again hoping nothing will go wrong, but it does about every 12 years or so for the past 50-55 years. or so.
And everyone fails to mention people whose investments weren't big enough to survive those downtimes and crises.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ghosts bad? Are you confusing it with MW2, BO1 or MW3?
Ghosts had perfect hit detection. You died as fast as you were supposed to, even though in Ghosts you die slower than in MW2 and MW3, because guns in Ghosts had lower DPS, but MW2 and MW3 had shit net-code and hit registration so you died slower.
The gun balance in Ghosts was near perfect, just about every weapon was/is used, unlike in MW2 and WM3 where there are 1-2 weapons of each class that dominate them all.
The kill streaks in Ghosts were NOT overpowered like in MW3 and especially MW2, where you could win a game just by getting a couple of kill streaks, just awful..
The gadgets, "specials" and granades in MW2 and WM3 were absurdly overpowreded.
The Maps in ghosts were made a bit bigger and more tactical so that you can actually play with more thought, while the (most)maps in MW2 and MW3 were too chaotic with too many lines of sight and were just bad.
What do MW2 and MW3 have over ghosts? Nothing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Joe Bob ok an example, the r9 380 and gtx 960.
before I begin here are some tips for you to understand how I get my numbers:
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.
-------------------------------------------------------
So the gtx 960 has 1127 MHz core clock, effective 7000MHz(1750Mhz) clocked Memory which is GDDR5 a 128 bit bus,1024 stream processing units/shaders( Cuda cores as Nvidia calls them), 64 TMUs(texture maping units) and 32 ROPs(Raster operation pipelines), thus it has a bandwidth of 112000 MB/sec, texel rate of 72128 Mtexels/sec and pixel rate of 36064 Mpixels/sec, usually a gpu with 112000 MB/sec bandwidth can utilize up to 1GB of ggd5 Vram effectively(500 MB GDDR5 Vram per 64 bits bus), but due to delta color compression and the large amount of L2 cache per unit, maxwell gpus can effectivly use double that amount( 1 GB of GDDR5 Vram per 64 bits) as long as the GPU is strong enough to benefit from it.
The r9 380 has a core clock of 970 MHz, effective memory clock of 5700MHz(1350MHz) of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus,1792 stream processors/ stream processing units/shaders, 112 TMUs and 32 ROPs and thus has bandwidth of 182400 MB/sec, texel rate of 108640 Mtexels/sec, pixel rate of 31040 Mpixels/sec.
The r9 380 has LDCC(lossless delta color compression) and a big pool of L2 cache per unit just like the maxwell gpus and is the only gpu from AMD, alongside the r9 380x, Fury(X)/Nano, that has LDCC and more L2 cache per unit, allowing it to utilize up to 4GB of Vram at full speed, but only ~3GB of Vram effectively, because the gpu isn't strong enough.
So far the r9 380 has more shaders, more Bandwidth, Higher texel rate and slightly lower pixel rate than the gtx 960, but Cuda Cores are ~48% more powerful than stream processors, due to higher shader clock speeds, thus if the shader performance of the r9 380 is 1792 the gtx 960 has roughly 1515 shader performance(keep in mind this is a rough calculation, which is pretty accurate, but by NO means the exact shader performance), the rest of the architectural specs - TMUs, ROPs, Memory, Bus, cache is identical in terms of performance per unit.
So the r9 380 is the clear winner spec and architecture-wise and it is prooven in many games, even Nvidia optimized titles like the witcher 3, the r9 380 beats the gtx 960 as long as hairworks in turned off, but that's because gameworks in NOT open source and AMD can't optimize their cards and drivers for it, due to legal issues.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
***** yes but these benefits come with highly scripted, too easy, not challenging, not punishing games with horrible AI. Games are meant for gameplay, mechanincs and good AI in general, not for graphics, story and plot, they are just bonuses... And btw I'm not an old gamer, I'm just 15 years old, and I've been playing games for 13 years now and I own every console from atari, sega, nintendo, sony and microsoft, except for the Wii, Wii U and xbox one, I don't like the Wii, I don't want the xbox one and the Wii U is stupidly expensive in my country, also I have 2 high-end gaming PCs, and over 500 games and I've played them all and personally 4th, 5th and 6th generations are my favorite ones.
1
-
Razorsand12 I always play the games on their hardest difficulty, or hardest avaliable difficulty, since some games have locked the hardest difficulty until you beat the game.
dark souls is a hack and slash, hack and slash games are easy, it's basically dodge and wait for an opening. In dark souls for example in the beginning it's dodge, dodge, hit, when you progress, it's dodge, dodge, dodge hit a few times, dodge, dodge, dodge, it's really easy and I find the game really easy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Blueberry Bandit Ghosts was better than MW2 and MW3 multiplayer-wise, but the only problem it had was the campers, due to the bigger maps which were actually amazingly well made if it weren't for the campers, plus it had spot on, near perfect net-code you died as fast as you were supposed to, gun balance was nearly perfect, kill streaks were NOT Op like in MW2 and MW3 and it allowed for more tactical play than usual.
Also the fact that they are calling it Ghosts 2 doesn't mean anything to the singleplayer, or multiplayer, except that they are continuing the story of ghosts, but as usual, it will be A attacks B and you have to be defending or attacking.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
PENDANTturnips You do realize that USE and BENEFIT are two different words? I Never said that a GPU can NOT Use the Vram, I said that it will NOT benefit from the extra Vram.
Also you do realize that it costs AMD and Nvidia 1$(up to 3$ depending on the failure rate) to double the Vram and they sell it for 30-50$ more, the profits are huge.
Also The reason for doubling the Vram is for crossfire and SLI, because the Vram does NOT stack, so you need 1x GPU with more Vram, but you need both the GPUs to have the same specs.
Also there are many benchmarks of the RX 480 4GB vs 8GB and except in games with Vram leaks, the 4GB performs just as good as the 8GB considering that the 4GB memory is clocked 15% lower.
For a GPU to Benefit from a certain amount of Vram it needs enough bandwidth(bandwidth = (memory bus * memory clock speeds * data rate of the memory type(*4 if GDDR5 *8 if GDDR5X))/8) and good amount of performance, because if the GPU is too weak at some point it will start losing performance more than gaining from the extra Vram.
In the Case of the RX 480 it is Neither strong enough, nor does it have enough bandwidth to benefit from more than 4GB of Vram, while the Gtx 1060, just like every GTX X60 GPU is bandwidth bottlenecked, due to it's narrower bus, just like the gtx 960 was bottlenecked with a 128 bit bus with 2GB of Vram, instead of having a 192 bit bus and 3GB of Vram, the gtx 660ti had a 192 bit bus and 2GB of Vram, although it managed to benefit from up to 1.5GB of Vram, instead of having 256 bit bus and benefit from all the 2GB of Vram(keep in mind that the gtx 600 and 700 series and previous do NOT have delta color compression).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
XavierPirelli I want an gtx 960ti, the gtx 960 is just not strong enough for my needs. And if in june-july amd's 150-250$ gpu beats the gtx 960, then I know where my money is going to.
And the reason it has only 2GB of Vram, is because of the 128 bit bus, it cannot use more than 2GB of Vram effectively, a.k.a, more than 2GB of Vram will NOT give any performance increase, under any scenario.
Also if the gtx 960 had a 256 bit bus then it would like the gtx 970, since it has less L2 cache/ disabled L2 cache memory pools, the whole reason the gtx 970 uses only 3.5GB of Vram to it's full bandwidth and 0.5GB is really slow.
The way maxwell work is, that it relys on it's delta color compression and it's L2 large cache pool to utilize high amounts of Vram.
If it were their 7xx series gpus or any amd gpu, you'd need 256 bit bus for 2GB of Vram and 512 Bit bus for 4GB of Vram, but the gtx 980 needs only a 256 bit bus for 4GB of Vram, reducing it's power consumption(TDP =/= power consumption, TDP stands for Thermal Design Power, a.k.a how much heat the gpu outputs and how good of a cooler you need to cool the gpu), but the fact remains that with a 256 bit bus, even when 4gb of Vram are utilized properly the bandwidth is still quite low and it can limit the card in some scenarios, well NOT gaming.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
***** no it does NOT... what review or article did you read that from?
I have built and configured servers for provinces, and am actively configuring and building people's and office PCs and I do it for free, cuz I'm not even 18.
The fact that you think that Vram alone means that you can pump better textures just goes to show that all you do is read articles, blogs and sites on the internet.... As I said the GTX 960 can NOT utililize more than 2GB of Vram effectively at full bandwidth speed, due to the lack of bandwidth and low performance, just like the gtx 970 4GB is a 3.5GB out of 4GB Vram video card, the gtx 960 4GB is a 2GB out of 4GB Vram video card.
Actually without any knowledge, a normal person could come to the conclusion that if a gtx 970, a much better GPU can NOT utilize 4GB of Vram effectively, only 3.5GB, a much weaker GPU like the gtx 960, would NOT even come close to that....
Also I know a lot because my father is a hardware engineer, and ever since I was a kid, he made me read and learn books about hardware and then he'd question me what I've learnt and if I had learnt well enough, he would buy a gift, like toy, or a console, or a bunch of games, you know kid stuff.
Also you are part of tom's hardware comunity.... that explains it all.... most cancerous tech site, with the biggest retards(99%) of all....
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Andrew Russell Oh boy we have another case of article alert.... and a person with bad reading comprehension.... I'm screwed...
Also what I'm going against is AMD and Nvidia's Marketing team at best, NOT their engineers... AMD and NVidia have been super secrative about they architectures in the past 5-6 years.
The texture pop-in in Shadow of mordor is needed due to the lack of Vram, but NOT only that... You can NOT just compare Kepler to maxwell and a much more powerful GPU with much more effective bandwidth due to lossless delta color compression like the gtx 980ti to the gtx 780ti that has no delta color compression.
A gtx 780ti with 6GB of Vram would still have the pop-in because the Vram itself is just storage, like a safe, if the GPU can NOT work with all the Vram at the same time at full bandwidth speed then it's NOT going to get any extra benefit from it.
A GPU like the gtx 980ti that has a 384 bit bus, with GDDR5 at whatever the clock speed was with lossless delta color compression is like a gtx 980ti that has a 768 bit bus, with GDDR5 at the same clock speed, but without lossless delta color compression.
So technically if the gtx 980ti was build on kepler, the gtx 980ti would be a 768 bit bus GPU to match the same performance...
The Lossless Delta Color Compression is the key, also the fact that the gtx 980ti has more cuda cores, more ROPs, more TMUs, also better cache and higher clocked Cuda Cores, thus more performance per core and a much better scheduler.
I hope I explained it as simple as possible, if NOT I can try to think of something more simple.
Do yourself a favor and read books please.
Also ME:Catalyst boots on both the 4GB and 8GB RX 480s on the max preset and it has a terrible Vram leak on the max preset, both GPUs stutter like hell...
AND AGAIN IN CAPITALS, I NEVER< NEVER, NEVER SAID A GPU CAN NOT USE ALL OF ITS VRAM EVEN A HD5450 CAN USE 4GB of VRAM, but it will NOT GET ANY EXTRA PERFORMANCE OR BENEFIT
Can you make a difference between USE and BENEFIT?
1
-
Andrew Russell indeed, but the 4th gen is much better than the previous ones as the previous generations were barely effective in comparsion and my statement is correct a 384 bit kepler has effective bandwidth as much as a 192 bit maxwell.
Also the 4GB 960 is for SLI purposes, as the Vram does NOT stack, but also Nvidia bets that people like you would buy the gtx 960 4GB out of feeling secure. It costs them a couple of dollars do double that 2GB to 4GB and they sell it at a massive profit, usually 30-50$ more expensive than the lower amount of Vram.
Let's just speak common sense, nothing technical.
Also do you think that if the GTX 970 can NOT use all the 4GB of Vram AT FULL BANDWIDTH SPEED(it can use it all, but NOT benefit from that slower 0.5GB of VRam), because it has lower bandwidth and less cache, a gtx 960 with twice as low bandwidth and cache and even lower performance can?
Also they are being secrative, before they would give every little detail on their architectures, now they barely give us anything except marketing BS...
I love love to know information on their architectures down to the logic gates they use, but they never give us that do they?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Technically you can headbang on all of these songs and every rock song and it's sub-genre, but NOT all songs are good for pure headbnaging.... I agree with Down with the sickness, Raining Blood and Walk. Creeping Death? out of all metallica songs, Creeping Death is more of a mosh pit - sing-along song, there is Whiplash, Fight Fire With Fire, Damage. inc, Battery, Blackened, Shortest Straw, All nighmare long, King Nothing, My World and the list goes on... But NOT Creaping death.
1
-
1
-
themetalgod66683 I could be wrong, but the only death metal bands I've heard so far that I tought were good are death, canibal corpse, amon amrath, possessed, deicide and arch enemy, and I've heard about 50 bands+, I know that's not a lot, but I've heard that much only because besides the ones I've listed that I like, they all claimed to be death metal and they all had that growl that it's really hard to understand, and the lyrics were poorly writen and the instrumental was just chaotic in a bad way....
Also english is my second language as well.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
themetalgod66683 it's not the government, it's the people... yeah the government is sucking, but we have the freedom of buying everything we want, but they don't provide it to us, so we have to buy it from foreign coutnries, and thus make our country even poorer, since my country - Bulgaria is just a consumer, aka only buys stuff from other countries, we don't sell anything to anybody, and since we joined the EU, we've closed 99% of our factories and such, we produce only bread, alchohol and roses in general.... other products usually come from the EU(we pay for them of course) and this way we are only dishing money away....
Also we will be thrown out of the EU if the minimal wage doesn't become 500 Euro until 2017-2018, but if it becomes 500 euro, everything will become even more expensive... so what's the point anyway...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Party Waffel at the moment the iGPUs of intel CPUs don't do calculations instead of the CPUs, but for example the 10 7850k with HSA, there are tasks that the iGPU does instead of the CPU, while the CPU just does instructions, like in adobe.
Why would amd or intel put their iGPUs on the CPU die, when for AMD APUs the iGPU takes 50% of the chip die space, and for intel CPUs the iGPU tkaes 30%, when they could just make their cores bigger(with more units) and much better?
It may not be available right now, both amd and intel are working towards making iGPUs be what we pick our CPUs by and not the CPU part itself. Since iGPUs(or in other words CPUs with hundreds of cores that can do calculations, but no x86 instructions) are much better.
Graphcis are displayed through calculations buddy, a CPU can do graphics as well, but it's much slower than a GPU, but the GPU can't do x86 instructions. In the past CPUs were doing graphics.
1
-
1
-
Party Waffel but the iGPU is NOT meant to do graphics in desktop PCs, the iGPU on the CPU die is originally meant to do calculations instead of the CPU, they wanted to call it co-processor, but that would have been confused with the previous co-processors, which were FPUs. They called it a graphics card, just because... well it's a graphics processor/ it's capable of doing graphics.
iGPUs for desktops are NOT targeted towards gaming and there is still little to no software dev kits, languages, extensions, libraries to write for hydrogenous computing.
if amd and intel wanted the iGPU to be for Graphics and graphics only, they would have just kept integrating it in the motherboard's north bridge, then the iGPUs would have been much more powerful than they are now, but that's not the point.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
***** It means that the r9 390x and r9 390 use the last (arround)2GB out of 8GB of Vram as the gtx 970 does the 3.5GB out of 4.0GB Vram, at really, really low speeds.
With the r9 390x and r9 390 we can't have a sure number, because unlike the maxwell gtx 970 which relies on large amounts of L2 cache to utilize Vram effectively, the r9 390 and r9 390x Hawaii rely heavily on raw bandwidth. The gtx 970 has one L2 cache module disabled, thus one Vram module, which is 512MB big, is utilized at 22Gb/s instead of 220GB/s like the rest 3.5GB of Vram.
Bandwidth formula:
It's calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
***** true, but for example in my case I don't need more than a single r9 285, I've got 2x r9 285s just because I wanted to see how it is having a crossfire set up(and my father was paying for the second GPU). I game at 1680x1050 or 1440x900 depending on which monitor I use and even one r9 285 can max everything. Thanks to VSR now I'm playing at down-scaled 2500x1600 and everything still works great.
P.S don't be fooled by the low resolution, both monitors have a ton of ports, DVI, HDMI, Display Port, Scart, rga, composite, component video, S-Video and Aux and cost quite a bit. I have a lot of consoles after all.
1
-
tony10980 I've been interested in computers ever since I'm 7-8 years old. I've read a lot of books about hardware architecture, computer science, software development, I've read a lot about optimization, API, Drivers, machine code and such, since I plan on working in an area with computer science, be it hardware, software, support, or anything really.
And NO I don't classify myself as a nerd... I'm social and I'm not talking about facebook and twitter and all that bullshit, that is not social... I go out with friends and have fun like it should be... I don't even have any social media account, if we don't count youtube and google+....
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Scuba Sausage I've never had problems with drivers from either company(own both atm). 3rd party AMD gpus are as cool as 3rd party nvidia counterparts give or take 1-3C. And 3rd party Nvidia GPUs consume close to 3rd party AMD counter-parts, not that the difference between stock ones is big either, keep in mind TDP is NOT power consumption.
The way I buy my gpus is:
1. I look at how much money I have.
2. I look at the best gpu at the money amount that I have.
3. Then I look if the GPU will do the job.
3.1 If it does I buy it.
3.2 else I continue saving.
4. Repeat.
In my country(and eastern europe, africa and parts of Asia) the problem with Nvidia is that it costs 20% + 20% TAX which makes them too expensive to be worth.
I personally own 4x up to date AMD gpus and 1x up to date nvidia gpu. 2x hd 7850s, 2x r9 285/380 and 1x Gtx 970 and I've NOT have any problems with my GPUs be it software or hardware/physical and all my gpus run cool. The R9 285/380s fans don't even turn on until it reaches 65C and when they do, it's at such low RPM and usually go back off.
Gtx 970 is really cool as well, but I got the reference so it's a bit loud, but I don't give a fuck about noise. And the hd7850s are again reference and run ok, but they are in crossfire and do get a bit warm.
Keep in mind I have brother and I travel often enough and I hate laptops so the PCs are justified, the 2x hd 7850 one was huge so I needed another small PC so my father payed for the 970 one, while my main rig with the 2x r9 285/380 has already small case.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@undeadwarrior88 L what? What part of what I said am I wrong about? Would you rather know useless facts about Geography, History, Biology, etc and be useless after 12-20 years of "education" or have a high paying job/career at 16-18?
Imagine at 18 starting a job as an engineer(mechanical, electrical, programmer, etc) OR a trade(mechanic, electrician, plumber, machinist, etc) OR be a lawyer/attorney/etc OR an accountant at a MEDIUM position, earning great money.
But you don't know all the countries in Europe... oh no...
1
-
@jeanrodriguez2078 No it quite literally does NOT teach you almost any real world information. The only exception being reading, writing and arithmetic in elementary school, if your parents didn't already teach you that.
The physics you learn in school is mostly fake(incomplete), Geography and History are useless and History is also skewed. The chemistry is also incomplete. And all these subjects are way too shallow, you barely learn anything... you learn 3-6 pages in 40 minutes, as if you are a moron.
My specialization was programming, math and physics and when it comes to programming and physics we learnt in 5 years what could be learnt in 5 months and in my country when it comes to STEM schools, we study advanced(university) math, physics and programming starting from grade 10. Basically what you guys in the west study in the first 3-4 semesters we study in grade 10, 11 and 12. I have many friends that went to the USA, Germany, Austria, England and Canada and they breezed through university. STILL USELESS.
You basically learn nothing about everything.
And it's proven that forced social environments like school are the reason people have much lower social skills nowadays, coupled with huge cities and social media, but school was the first to ruin social skills.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JVlk-tw6fs Yes the animals needed no care at all... man you are repeating internet arguments... -_-
Animals need care every day of the year.
You had to also cut wood, make clothes, fix things around the house that you were too busy to fix in the more active season.
And there for sure were aristocracy that didn't work, but a lot did, outside of exceptional periods.
That's like saying the CEO doesn't work, nor the CTO, CFO, nor the COO... Management is a job too and so is diplomacy.
Again it's history starts from 1700-1800 in your head.
Aristocracy was also expected to wage wars and lead the army, left, right, front and center.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JVlk-tw6fs They also managed armies, had to set moral standards, had to check the work of everyone under them when it came to both accounting and production, so they needed the skills to do that as well.
They needed to know and understand law, accounting, logistics and management. Otherwise you could easily lie to them and rob them naked.
They also had to show class by learning a lot of "culture", basically musical instruments, poetry, etc, etc.
You can't have a ruler that can't do what his people can(before high technologies came to be).
Plus they had to be really well socially versed, people wouldn't follow them otherwise, they'd go to a different noble or nobody all together.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kevins6732 Well yeah, absolutely, but the problem is that people hear "intelligence quotient
" and think it applies to general intelligence, which it is not. Pattern matching and finding, concentration, tricky questions, etc, etc, but NOT general intelligence.
One can have an IQ of 250 and still not even begin to grasp let's say hardware micro-architecture or programming, or physics...
Not because one is more or less intelligent or smart, but because you just have to study for those things.
1
-
@kevins6732
Well, electrical engineering is a very broad term. It encompasses digital computers, electronics, power engineering, telecommunications and networking, radio systems, microelectronics, control systems, and a couple more subfields.
And most of them are relatively simple.
I myself studied hardware micro-architecture and design, primarily for microprocessors when I was in school(Not from school or the education system, just by myself from books and from my dad), which is part of electrical engineering and is probably one of the most complicated subfields of electrical engineering, but I wouldn't say that you have to be "smart" to learn it, it's just a lot of information and patterns and logic, but everyone who WANTs to can learn it.
On the other hand telecommunications and networking is relatively simple with a lot less information you need to know as they are on a higher abstraction and especially radio systems.
But again everybody can learn them. The problem with people that say that they can't is that they expect instant gratification, they expect to get everything from the get-go.
People also expect that they can learn it and master it within a couple hundred hours or a thousand hours, which is not the case.
You start studying something in a new field you've never had anything to do with before and you are basically lost, in the beginning, you are absorbing a lot of information, still figuring it out, then when you've read and mastered 2-3x books, it starts to become clearer, and then you read and master a dozen more, revisiting many when needed and practicing them too.
Of course, there are many learn quickly and effectively techniques, but they take the fun out of learning.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@anneb889 Thank you kindly.
I have no social media outside of youtube, so IDK, I've been thinking about making some, but I never get to it.
I'd say thins were less complicated 8 years ago as well, IDK where things turned south and why everyone started migrating and centralizing.
I too prefer small towns, mine is 60k people, but I thought I'd live in my grandparent's town when I was younger(which was around 5000 people), but everyone young ran away from there as well due to there being almost no jobs.
I value my health and I don't drink, smoke or anything of that sort, either. But there are illnesses that come with age no matter what. Seeing my family and my extended family, nobody has been healthy past 40, even if they are in good shape and don't abuse their body.(Now they are functional, but there are organ problems, hormone problems and other).
I would be worried if I had a daughter too... especially with online apps. There are terrible men out there, I know some(from back in high school and university). They are charismatic and manipulative... they pretty much use and discard women as they please... Sure these types are rare, but they are the ones that get a lot of the attention. One of them is enough to break the hearts of dozens of women.
Yes life is meaningless without children. I used to think I didn't want kids when I was in high school, but after living for a while, I find it that anything I do would be pointless if I don't have kids. I've enjoyed life enough, sure I haven't done many things, but those are trivial and unimportant to life.
I wish you great health and the best of luck as well.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thekindredstoil True, I have moved into the capital since I posted the original comment and in the past month I've been out 6/7 days of the week, but so far all the places that I've gone have been 99-100% men(not exactly 99%, but you get the point), not counting the gym, but I don't go to the gym to be flirted with so I don't bother people either.
But I will keep trying and try finding other places to go, hobby places seem like bad places. So far I went wall climbing, board games club, karting, airsoft, retro game bar, a bar with billiards, ping pong and darts, climbed a mountain, hiking, cinema, a concert and to a few restaurants.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@@tuscan4174 Thanks. It's all by design. The chance of people competing with the big companies and the government must be crushed, otherwise the people in power, won't be in power for too long.
And I'm passionate about it, because even though I'm in my mid-20s I see how my life has been wasted, and even though I got a good job now, by the time I become good enough, I'll be too old. Those 17 years could have been used so much more productively both intellectually and physically.
You can read Weapons of Mass Instruction, in where they literally cite the letters of the people who invented the current education system and what they said in those letters is that they don't want smart, thinking, capable people, they wanted obedient, soul-dead, conformists that are smart enough to operate the machines, but dumb enough not to ask any questions or think for themselves.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@GoatOfMind Yeah, but I can work most manual labour jobs with just a couple of months training, some straight away with no training/skill since the age of 12-13, while engineering jobs require years of consistent, dedicated studying...
And no doctors are NOT one of the most essential jobs we need. They are in the middle.
Without miners doctors are useless. What you go to a doctor and he says you got pneumonia, but there is no medicine because nobody mined it, then there were no chemical engineers to process it and discover/invent the medicine it in the first place...
You break your leg badly and it needs surgery, well too bad, not enough metal for doctor instruments, no pain killers, no nothing.
Plumbers and good plumbing and higine save 1000x more lives than doctors do yearly.
You go to the doctor, but he is sitting on the street, because there is no hospital BUILDING, because there are no construction workers, good luck operating on a patient.
You go to the doctor, but there are no instruments and medicine, because people treat truck drivers like crap and they quit and now there is nobody to do the logistics, oh wow we overproduced? Who cares, it can't leave the factory, can't leave the mine, can't leave the field. And there were no petrolium engineers to make fuel, or batteries... so now even if you have trucks and truckers they don't run. And there were no electrical engineers to make electricity for the factory of medicine and medical tools to work.
You go to a doctor and he is dead, because nobody made food(looking at the EU banning wheat and cow farms).
Miners, Metallurgists, Lumberjacks, Farmers, Machine engineers, plumbers, construction workers, truck drivers, train drivers and other logistics professionals, chemical engineers, electrical engineers. Those are the really important jobs.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@supersaiyaman11589 The problem is that employers answer to share holders, not employees.
A solution would be for the government to stop backing investments. This way you can "invest", but in reality you are just giving money away to a company that wouldn't be obliged to give you any of the profits and stocks wouldn't really exist.
The other thing is for the government to stop backing loans. Apart from the fact that the last few decades worth of economic crises have been caused by irresponsible loans, if there are no loans, then one person with an excellent idea can't get a loan and have workers for work for him/her.
This would lead to that person having to get people to voluntarily come and work WITH him/her, rather than FOR him/her, making for a more democratic company, where there are multiple owners, similar to stock owners, but at the same time they would be also the employees of the company. Of course things such as secretaries, cleaners and other similar service jobs within companies will always remain working FOR the company.
And the third thing would be for there to be no pensions/social security and all that. Why? Well simple, this would mean that the parents are directly dependent on the children to take care of them when they get old, which is huge motivation to first be good people towards the children and second want their children to do as good as possible in life, or in other words not neglect them to the education system which in 12-20 years produces useless, stupid, obedient, soul-dead, conformists that aren't good enough to work anything harder than a mc'donalds job or cashier, unless they self-educated way past the education system or went to private courses, boot camps, academies and so on.
Now the counter arguments to the first two points is that we'd have fewer businesses, which will be true initially, massive changes like that have a down period for sure, but in the long run, it should make things better.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes, it includes not only the R&D, but also the Total Operating Costs of the companies, as in everything they have to pay. Salaries, materials, electricity, benefits, health care, rent, etc, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@td601 Well I have to go by genre, my favorite genre is Thrash Metal
1. Megadeth + Metallica + Testament => tied for first place
2. Kreator
3. Flotsam and Jetsam
4. Death Angel
5. Slayer
Honorable mentions: Overkill, Havok, Evile, Exodus, Sodom, Annihilator, nuclear assault.
Groove Metal:
1. Pantera
2. Sepultura
3. Machine Head
4. Wolfpack Unleashed(yes just one album)
Heavy Metal:
1. Iron Maiden
2. Judas Priest
3. Dream Theater
4. Ghost
5. Iced Earth
Honorable mention: Black Sabbath, Diamond Head, Hellyeah, Stone Sour, Ozzy, Rob, Bruce solo careers.
Death Metal:
1. Death + Lamb of God -> tie
2. Opeth + Obituary -> tie
3. Arch Enemy + Children of Bodom -> tie
4. Avatar + Dethklok -> Tie
5. Amon Amarth + Mors Principium Est
Honorable: Napalm Death, (some)Cannibal Corpse, Morbid Angel, Possessed,
Power Metal:
1. Manowar
2. Sabaton
3. Helloween
4. Hammerfall
5. Powerwolf
Honorable: Blind Guardian, Taking dawn
Alternative Metal:
1. Disturbed
2. Godsmack
3. Alice in Chains
4. Deftones
5. Breaking Benjamin
Honorable: First two albums of Linkin Pak, Rage against the machine, Avenged Sevenfold
Nu Metal:
1. Korn
2. Slipknot
3. Static-X
4. Coal chamber
5. Skindred
Honorable: Some limp bizkit, drowning pool, Soulfly
Metalcore:
1. Trivium
2. InFlames
3. The Agonist
4. Hatebreed
5. Born of Osiris
Black Metal:(not a big black metal fan)
1. Satyricon
2. Thulcandra
3. Bathory
4. Mayhem
5. Behemoth
Honorable: Venom, Cradle of Filth
Edit: I'm for sure forgetting some, this is off the top of my head.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Purplepentapus_ The problem is that they have the ubisoft/rockstar-like pointless side activities. I much more prefer a compact, dense world with a lot of quality content than a big, wide, open world with boring tasks to do. Think Deus Ex, Batman Arkham games, Morrowind, The Outer worlds, Dragon Age Origins, etc.
Also the dialogues were mostly poorly written. They were just there to further the story, plot or character and didn't feel natural at all.
They also have the Assassin's Creed 3, 4, Rogue parkour system, which isn't satisfying to play. Holding a button and using the analog stick isn't satisfying anymore, it got boring way back when.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MikehMike01 First I agree that GPU prices and profit margins have gone up, but so have CPU profit margins. And both need to come down hard.
Now let me correct you:
The Ryzen 5 5600x should have been an 8 core/16 thread at 250-300$, not a 6 core/12 thread. Same with the R5 3600(X) as they went from Global Foundry's garbage(in comparison) 12/14nm to TSMC's 7nm.
The i5 2500k was 210$, i5 3570k was 235$, the 4670k was 250$, the 6600k was 250$ as well. Same with the i7s of those generations went from 290 to 350$ and the thing is they should have been getting cheaper, not more expensive.
Compare the GPUs now. GPUs with GDDR5 VRAM at 5.5$ per GB versus GPUs with GDDR6 VRAM at 11.5$ per GB...
The vram in the gtx 1060 3GB costed 16.5$, the rx 580 4gb costed 22$.
The 12GB vram in the gtx 3060 costs 138$...
Compare die sizes: Gtx 1080Ti 471mm^2, rtx 2080Ti 754mm^2 the chip is 60% bigger and about 70-75% more expensive.
The rtx 3080 has a die size of 628mm^2 which is 33% bigger than the gtx 1080Ti and about 40-45% more expensive.
The gtx 1000 series was the biggest rip-off GPU generation of them all. Nvidia sold them at 90-138% profit margin, whereas the rtx 2000 series were sold at 50-60% profit margin, gtx 900 at 45-60% profit margin. The biggest rip-off being the gtx 1080 at 700$ MSRP FE.
The GTX 1000 series did NOT have a High-end GPU, it had the gtx 1080Ti and GP102 a 471mm^2 die size chip out of 815mm^2 reticle limit, that's a bit above mid-range.
The gtx 1080/GP104 was a sub-mid range chip at 312mm^2 die size.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@scottdenham1795 I'm a software and hardware engineer and I've learnt nothing in in my software and hardware engineer university course in the 3x years I've been in it. In fact it has made me lose 10-12 hours a day in which I could have kept studying on my own and have gotten even better.
And my university was dumbed down after my country entered the EU so that it met EU standards, or in other words, all the core subject hours were cut in half and many pointless ones were added.
My friend became a junior software developer at the age of 16, he quit to go to university, I myself worked 3 months as a junior in the summer between school and university(19 years old). Now he quit university and became a software architect and team leader, but I'm gonna finish the stupid thing and then get back into proper shape and go and find a job and potentially start a company.
On top of that, I've been building and configuring servers, networks, home PCs since I was 11 and I wanted to be a CPU microarchitecture designer, but then I realized that I had to move to the USA or China to become one, so at 16 I started learning to program and ditched hardware design.
I'm also good at fixing cars, working with many different IT software and much more.
And guess what? I haven't even finished university, hell if anything university has really retarded me, I've forgot a ton of stuff thanks to my stupid univeristy keeping me busy all day every day during the week and then traveling a total of 7-8 hours every weekend...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@graceharrington4560 You just proved what men on the internet are saying about women.
You don't want a miner? You don't want a road layer/bridge builder? Do you realize that these are some of the many important jobs in this world essential to our survival? Construction workers, carpenters, welders, ditch diggers, plumbers, electricians, road layers, miners, farmers, workers at the oil rigs.
All these jobs are essential to our survival and yet women view the men(95-99% of these jobs are worked by men) doing them as dirt and would never give them the light of day.
You just prove you care about resources and status, rather than the person, which is exactly what the men on the internet are saying about women. Hypergamy.
Feminism has mostly benefited men though, so I'm fine with it. It freed men and enslaved women. Only negative for men is that now women are back to the natural basics.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@battlegalaxypro5466 it's one of my dream cars, I love so many though. :D
From Japan, I'd say the GTR R34, Supra, S2000, Integra Type R, NSX, S14/15, the Evo and WRX.
If I had to pick one it'd be a tie between the Evo and R34, hard to choose, maybe slightly towards the R34.
1
-
@battlegalaxypro5466 my only problems with BMW have always been the reliability and that they are usually overpriced. If their cars were priced reasonably and were more reliable(the electronics, water pumps, fuel pumps along with many other plastic parts and on some models head gaskets), I'd say they'd be amazing cars.
Their engines are amazing and usually bulletproof, the ZF transmissions they use are excellent their manuals are/were great, they are always quite light for their time.
They are rear-wheel drive, they used to have a neat minimalistic design, they have inline 6 engines and/or v8 engines in almost all their car models, which most companies don't anymore, but instead only have 3-4x cylinder small engines.
I mean you can get a 2 series BMW with an inline 6 and in everything above a 2 series, that's amazing, only the 1 series doesn't have one.
I also don't like the fact that they are focusing on "luxury" gimmicks, pointless, but I guess they are trying to be both luxurious and regular at the same time, similar to Mazda.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bunnyboo6295 They are not sex objects, but what are they to guys? They don't have the same values, they don't have the same interests, they don't care what men want or need, they are usually thinking about how they can benefit...
They are harder to get along with than with the guys, they are not good support, many stop respecting you if you go to them for help in tough times.
men want to be with a partner for their compatibility and common character, values and interests, and sex while women want to be with a person to get something more than just a relationship with a compatible partner.
But I guess it's human nature and it's different between men and women and we are extremely incompatible. Most men and women just don't make for good friends and partners, so only sex for men and providing, protection, emotional support and sex for women are left.
And sure there are exceptions, but that's why they are called exceptions, we count everyone except them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DefineHatespeech Oh really, so my friends that didn't go to school as much as possible, instead went to private courses and academies became engineers during high school or straight out of high school, I wanted to go to those too, but my parents said I was stupid and that school was more important. They instead sent me to after class activities... worthless crap.
I researched and found that universities are just as useless as schools, still forced me to go, because I wasn't ready to get an engineering job straight out of high school, I needed 1 more year to prepare myself since I started preparing myself in the last grade.
Now that I'm in my last year and semester of university, I've learnt next to nothing new and am a worse programmer than when I started uni... while my friends have opened their own businesses and are very profitable now...
I told my father to buy solar when he could, he said it's stupid, I gave him a better business plan(which I read in books about, I'm no business genius), he said it was stupid, a couple of years ago, my uncle went on that business plan after reading the same books and it's much better than before, then he bought solar for his house and his stores and now those solar panels are a net profit, instead of paying for electricity...
Those are just some of the major ones and many of the minor ones... that I wasn't listened to because I was "too young"...
The biggest problem is that parents treat their children like morons until the age of 18, then suddenly want them to be adults, instead of treating them like an unexperienced adult from the get go.
Your kid should be mentally an adult by the age of 14 at most. Otherwise you've failed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@needparalegal Wrong, you have the you have the cause and effect backward. Excellent people go to universities, but universities and the entire education system produce weak, stupid, useless people in 12-20 years and wastes our youth.
If kids were specialized starting at the age of 10-12 in One engineering field, Or one trade, or law or commerce, by the time they are 16-20 years old, they'd be highly skilled and knowledgeable experts that would be able to work a middle position in their (sub)sphere and wouldn't be desperately handing out their CVs to 1000 companies hoping that one would hire them.
These degrees are invented by the government and companies, and then they tell you that if you don't have the degree you won't be hired(which thankfully for engineering jobs is becoming less and less common).
That's full on authoritarian aristocracy right there.
You can't be a military engineer without a degree, so that automatically means that people have to have a degree.
I majored in Computer Science and minored Telecommunications and I guarantee to you, we learnt almost nothing, I learnt (almost literally)infinitely more through private courses and especially self-education.
Don't be an authoritarian sucker.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@magnusorn7313 No they become experts by reading, learning, practicing and mastering 2-3 subjects in their sphere. Not 11 different subjects at a sub-basic abstraction, depth and complexity...
In 12 years if a child from the age of 7-8 studies just mathematics and programming, 8 hours a day total, 4 at school, 4 at home, that child by 13-14 will be more than capable than what currently is an average adult programmer, way beyond that. Same with any engineering job really.
Same with becoming a doctor.
Same with anything really... -_-
You have the child study 8 hours a day, 4 at school, 4 at home, reading Actual BOOKs, that an engineer would write and read, that a doctor would write and read, that aren't school books, but proper books... and then practicing what they read and learn.
1
-
@magnusorn7313 combine the first 7 grades into 4 grades total, 1-4 grade = 2 grades, 6-7 grade = 2 grades.
This means that it's the same, by the age 11-12 children have to specialize in most European countries, of course it's still a basic bitch education system, but they have specializations, and if the kid doesn't choose then, the parent will choose for them and they will be stuck for the most part.
Also sadly, as much as I hate it, most people work for the money and money alone, instead of finding a job they like, find interesting and fulfilling and are ready to dedicate about a third of their remaining life to it. So they won't care anyway, if anything they'd prefer the option where they can be employable in their sphere by the age of 13-14(15 at worst).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@winstance4493 Schools were never about learning, NEVER. Even the inventors of the current education system in their letters said that they didn't want free thinkers, inventors, embryo great artists, painters, musicians, nor lawyers, doctors, preachers,
politicians, statesmen.
Go check "Weapons of mass Instruction".
I will leave you with a quote from the letters of the inventors of the current education system:
"...listen to what Rockefeller's General
Education Board thought the mission should be. Its statement
occurs in multiple forms, this one taken from a 1906 document called
Occasional Letter Number One:
In our dreams ... people yield themselves with perfect docility
to our molding hands. The present educational conventions
[of intellectual and moral education] fade from .
our minds, and unhampered by tradition we work our own
good will upon a grateful and responsive folk. We shall not
try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers
or men of learning or men of science. We have
not to raise up from among them authors, educators, poets,
or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great
artists, painters, musicians, nor lawyers, doctors, preachers,
politicians, statesmen - of whom we· have an ample supply.
The task we set before ourselves is very simple ... we will
organize children ... and teach them to do in a perfect way
the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect
way.
In other words, they didn't want brains or talent, just obedience..." JT Gato "Weapons of Mass Instruction"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
yup, by the age of 18-21 people should have the knowledge and skill to be an expert in a field so they can land a good position job in said field, be more than simply financially literate, they should be well aware how the economy functions, investments and all the possibilities they have within the economic model in their country and should be socially adept.
Instead parents neglect their children to the education system, they don't help them develop any sort of character, skill and experience and think that as long as they buy them toys and the kids get As it's all good, when the education system produces useless people, destroys the social ability of people and sets them up for failure.
You need 10-20x more knowledge and literally infinitely more experience than the 4-8x years of university to be acceptable, not even mediocre in a field.
Of course there are exceptions like Medicine and Law where you need to graduate from University, but still, those are the exceptions.
And they should be in great physical shape and health.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@erint5373 If the government wanted to increase the birth rate, they'd tax extra people who have fewer than 3 children. And if people have more than 4 children people tax them again, this way people would have 3-4 children.
The other thing is to remove social securities and pensions, so that children have to directly take care of their parents.
This way people will be good towards their children and also be good parents. This means that they'd make sure their children are well off in life, by making them master a field and become a highly skilled and knowledgeable expert in that field. So that they can work in it by the age of 18.
Also, people are so short-sighted. If you don't have kids, in the future there will be 5-6 retired, old people, for each working person, so you'd be taxed to oblivion to take care of those people... and all the politicians will pander towards them.
So enjoy ever-increasing taxes to take care of the elderly in the next 30-50 years.
Also not having a person(your child) to replace you when you die, it's the equivalent of murder from both a moral and technical standpoint.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TwoWolves So are Computer Science, Telecommunication, Computer Systems, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, any sort of Math and Physics, IT and so on...
Yes their fields are brilliant, but they don't teach you s4!t in University about them... How do I know? I majored in Computer Science and minored in Telecommunications and Computer Systems, I know many people that Majored Eelctrical engineering, machine design and engineering, aircraft engineering, IT, Electrical Engineering, Applied Mathematics and the list goes on... they don't teach you almost anything up to date and/or valuable... not to mention the lack of any and all real world experience.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@commanderoof4578 I was talking about GDDR6, I don't know the prices of GDDR6X, those aren't publicly available. Fast GDDR6 came out this year, 21Gbps and 24Gbps to be exact.
Also to elaborate on the bus width. Each GDDR6(X) chip runs either at 32 bit width or 16 bit width, that means that each chip takes 32 bits of the memory bus, thus to run at full bandwidth a 128 bit card can have 4x GDDR6(X) chips running at 32 bit width, until a couple of months ago, the highest capacity GDDR6(X) chip was 2GB, that means that until recently a 128 bit card could NOT have more than 8GB of VRAM at full bandwidth.
If you for example put more than 4x chips on a 128 bit card, for example 8, that means that each of the chips will have to run at 16 bit mode, which would cut bandwidth in half, just like the RTX A4000 ADA which has 20GB of RAM on a 160 bit bus with 10x 2GB Chips, instead of 5x 2GB chips and has half the bandwidth of a 4070.
By JEDEC standards there should be 1.5GB and 3GB GDDR6 chips as well, but it seems that they have skipped them. 3GB is a missed opportunity as the jump from 8GB to 16GB is extreme and the cards don't have enough bandwidth to utilize it effectively, while 12GB would have been much better overall for 1440p gaming. 1080p is still fine with even 6GB of VRAM, so 8GB is perfect for 1080p in the next few years.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@insomniacresurrected1000 I'm doing CS too, final semester, I want to be a programmer, and I became a worse programmer in my first two years of university than before I enter university, after which I started taking private courses and self-education a lot again, relearning a lot of what I had forgotten.
And keep in mind I had programming 7 classes per week in school and my education system's math, physics and "informatics"(programming) in high school is what the western one studies in the first 3-4 semesters of university.
It's still worthless crap... I've learnt almost nothing new, aside from some math, which is worthless to me and 99% of people.
The education system teaches you next to nothing about everything, about 6-10 subjects, in school they go up to 13-14... absolute waste of time.
Private courses take in kids as young as 10-11 and in 1-3 years(depending on the field) produce experts...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tipsy09 To be a 5/10 you have to be fit, which means a flat or almost flat stomach, no flabby arms and fat hands, no jiggling giant hips(tight hips = muscle it's different), no nothing. So with that:
70% of both men and women in the US are overweight and or obese, 70% of NA people are overweight and/or obese, 55% in Europe, in South America 54% of men and 70% of women are overweight and/or obese(here I separated them as the gap between the two is big), in Africa, 38% are overweight and/or obese, In Asia on average 34% are overweight and/or obese, but east Asia the percentage is low, while western and central Asia the percentage is high.
1
-
Yes people can, they just prefer to buy slightly more expensive version of the same materialistic crap and even more materialistic crap.
If you lived in 1920, hell even in 1950 for example, you wouldn't have a car, you wouldn't have a phone, tablet, computer, TV, and all other non-essential electronics.
You'd have a stove and a fridge(you may add an air-conditioner for modern times as it's one of the best ways to heat your rooms).
You wouldn't go on stupidly expensive and overpriced vacations and eat out in stupidly expensive and overpriced restaurants and buy stupidly expensive and overpriced clothes.
You wouldn't have 10 different electrical/gasoline garden tools.
You wouldn't buy a massively oversized house or apartment either.
So it's not that simply things have gone worse nowadays, people have started using more than ever, even if salaries went up along with inflation and everything else stayed the same, people are just buying more different things and nowadays there are dozens of Tiers of each item and each tier is more expensive than the last.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
News flash, the majority of women are much below a 5/10, and yet they complain that they can't get a man that is practically a god.
Most women are overweight, are not feminine, are promiscuous and have nothing in common with men in terms of values, world views and goals.
Most women don't deserve a man that earns the median income let alone someone better.
Men have to be 10x better, do 10x more for women that are 20x worse than 60 years ago.
My grandma was a doctor from a well off family, my grandpa had just started working, had nooney, no charisma, was short and came from a poor family. Yet they got together because they were compatible enough and enjoyed spending time together. Go figure.
And in my country women have been fully equal to men since 1920, no excuse, nobody needed the other one, nothing as such.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gmanm1907 no I meant the wisdom of men about women across man millenia is in many cases true, the solution is practical, but not moral, but it is quite true.
And it'd be funny if anyone said men aren't stronger than women.
The problem nowadays is that if men go man-mode and go all out, they'd obliterate women, so now social norms and laws literally prohibit you from being a man.
So if you go man-mode you are an oppressor, bully, patriarch, evil and all that, but if you lay back and let them be, then you are a loser... either way you end up on top or you end up on top, but you lose either way.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bevvy.bee9 Well I've read books, watched some videos, but not his, If I've watched a video of his I never checked the channel, just like I haven't checked this channel
I've come to many of the same conclusions on my own, but gave them different names.
What economists call BS jobs, and that's a legit economic term btw, I called luxury jobs. Jobs where the services are basically a luxury to the people, not giving them any benefit nor any product/resource, but also a luxury to the ones working them as they are paid to be unproductive, unskilled and providing a pointless service.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nayan.punekar You didn't see anything on a split screen in a compressed video stream though your own screen...
Also AMD integrates their execution units into the CUs, instead of being modular like Nvidia.
Next hardware acceleration literally means having a dedicated hardware IC that accelerates a certain group of calculations and boolean logic, tensor cores are hardware acceleration.
Then if you even know what instructions the tensor cores do, they do matrix computation, which stream processors and cuda cores already do, but AMD GPUs usually are much better than Nvidia GPUs at raw compute power due to having a much bigger instruction set, whereas since Nvidia introduced CUDA, their instruction set has been very limited in comparison, which is why CUDA is compensating for it.
And finally wait and see. DLSS was crap when it came out, now it's good, it should get even better.
And AMD will most likely add in hardware acceleration for downscaling and super sampling as well with their next generation of GPUs if need be, but if we already have what is needed only through software, which is possible, just a lot harder, then we wouldn't need hardware acceleration for it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@milhouse14 If you are smart about it yes.
Go in a crowded, closed out space, start knifing them hard. I told ya a guy in Japan killed 19 adults and injured many more with a knife and the guy was tiny...
Realistically a pistol can do more damage, because it's more compact, the AR15 you are flailing it left and right, it recoils more, though you can chamber it in 9mm, but still.
A truck or bigger SUV can run through hundreds of people no problem like it did 6 times in France, or Wisconsin, WTC, Huston, Spain, Virginia, UK, Germany and Quebec.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@katieandnick4113 Very true, but it's women more than men that want to chase their feelings. A man earning the average salary in Europe or North America has more than enough money to take care of the kids, but that means no luxuries, which women think they "deserve". This means no holidays, no branded clothes, no branded phones, no jewelry, having to buy second hand from time to time and just standard things.
You think that before the industrial revolution women didn't work on the farm? Or helped in the workshop? They did, the moment they weren't pregnant or had to take care of babies. That's why they wanted to be pregnant so much, better to be pregnant than to do back breaking work 12 hours a day 6 days a week.
The industrial revolution changed things a bit, so women didn't want to work anymore and were priviliged NOT to work. I bet you that if women had to work manual labor 12 hours a day, 6 days a week, 95%+ of women wouldn't work, not just not want to work, they just wouldn't.
Keep in mind if you were born the 18th or 19th century, NOT in to a wealthy family, you couldn't be a doctor, lawyer or teacher, in administration and any other form of office job. It was back breaking manual labor for you, 12 hours a day, 6 days a week, during the period of the greatest inequality in the last 1000 years.
Edit: Also women refuse to live communally, they are all about the nuclear family... so that drives prices up to the freaking sky for everything.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Lurch-Bot AAA games nowadays are made by teams of 800-2500 people, AAA games in the 2000s were made by 40-70 people(not counting contractors in both cases). And the efficiency drops by a lot when you have teams of that size.
And the quality is worse because of the insanely high graphical fidelity. They can't test the game, because they don't have all the assets, animations, textures, objects, etc finished until a few months before release and this is all due to the push for more realistic and highly detailed graphics.
Also the most sold AAA games in 2004 sold 3-5 million copies, nowadays the most sold AAA games sell 8-30 million in one year.
The math is pretty simple and clear.
The solution is to downsize the studios back to around 100 people, go with 2005-2009 graphical fidelity, but with modern rendering technology(Ray Tracing, illumination, modern materials, etc).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
+Mark Herceg
I personally do NOT believe in borders, but since people do, we should at least try and unite where we have similarities, I mean Serbia, Kosevo, Bosnia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Bulgaria and even Romania(with some more difficulties) can unite with minimal difficulties IF the people so desire and actually start making universal language, culture, holidays and so on and Greece can join us as well, though they will have to adapt quite a bit more. I do NOT know about Albania though, NOT that I wouldn't want them, but I doubt they will.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
+Matthew B.
Also 20% is not a magic number, but for a billion dollar company 20% is more than enough to expand, hire new people, hire new people for new projects, give their investors a ton of cash, at the same time also build new buildings, more marketing, develop the next gen of the product that made them that 20% profit margin and everything really... Nvidia threw a party in 2009-2010-2011(don't remember which one), when they broke the 10% profit margin, now they really don't care that it's 100% and above, because if they were to brag about it, people will finally catch on to their bs and you know hate on them and still buy them as always...
Actually when they went below 50% with maxwell, they said it was "rough" quarter... -_-
1
-
+Matthew B.
I've followed closely all the costs of everything in the computer hardware sphere and believe me there is no cost increase apart from inflation from 2011-2017, this year 8GB GDDR5(X) rose in price from 8.5$ to 11.5$ to Nvidia and AMD, wafer prices went 7% on top of inflation, for the first time since 2009 did wafers become more expensive apart from inflation. Nvidia has barely been doing marketing outside of youtube and the cons anymore, before there were billboards, tv commercials and more.
And the cheaper = more people works in a market of need and social standards, the desktop PC market is really niche, I'm talking about the gaming and individual productivity market, it makes for about 5% of the market share. Most of the money are in servers and "compute" grids, where prices are negotiated, no MSRP or nothing, then there are the office/home/HTPC + laptops which are second in the market share and are overpriced.
If people have a problem buying overpriced OEMs, IDK why they wouldn't have a problem buying overpriced GPUs. Like here is an excellent argument. Ask anybody who is just barely invested into PCs and he'll tell you to build your own or have it built for you and to stay away from the overpriced OEMs that sell at big profit margins, same with overpriced GPUs...
If people say that you shouldn't buy them, they should be saying NOT to buy overpriced GPUs. But sadly it's a duopoly, not as bad as a monopoly, but almost there...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DigitalLogos the only reason it's "the exception" is because parents neglect their children to the education system, while quite a few of my friends and friends of my friends started learning a skill in 4-5th grade. My parents told me to stay in school... -_-
My friend that got a job after 10th grade was made to go to private programming courses and bootcamps since he was 10 years old by his father.
And this can apply to all engineering professions and law, and business, tons of private courses, private universities and boot camps that you can start teaching your children very young, even if it's not at 10, let's say 12-13, by the time they are 18-19 and have graduated from school they'll have the skill to find a medium position job in some engineering field, or business or law(though you need a degree for that), same with medicine.
Most people's lives really start at 25-30, which is utter BS, you have started dying at around 27 and your life is just beginning...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1