Comments by "Perhaps" (@NoEgg4u) on "Styxhexenhammer666" channel.

  1. 87
  2. 42
  3. 33
  4. Linda Yaccarino is what inspired on-line "BS Generators" to be created. She talks and talks, and says nothing, while sounding impressive. Thomson Reuters has had multiple executive management turnovers, and each one was worse than the previous one. The "busy" work that came from those people was highly detrimental to the moral of the staff, on all levels. Think about dealing with a government bureaucracy, where every step of the way, when you try to be productive, they put another obstacle in your way. Well, that goes on in large companies, too. You have loads of work to get done, and for example, they mandate that you take ITIL (Information Technology Infrastructure Library) training, which takes weeks of studying, passing dozens of quizzes, and 90% of the subject matter has zero to do with your function within the company. And you still have to get all of your work done. You have loads of work to get done, and they mandate you to take more on-line courses, that rarely helps your area of responsibility, and for which no human is available to assist with a question during the on-line, computer based training (CBT). You were not able to make out what was said during the training, and you played it back, over and over, and still can't make out what was said? Well, too bad. From what I have seen of Linda Yaccarino, she fits the above mold. I hope that Elon keeps tabs on when she rolls out any of the above, or similar. I hope that Elon, himself, takes the on-line training and on-line classes and even training with live instructors (but does not reveal himself), to see how counter productive and demoralizing it is. If Elon finds the above to be unbearable (and he will), then he will put a stop to Linda Yaccarino's wasteful policies. At a minimum, Elon should require that Linda Yaccarino take every course that she will be imposing on the employees. And she must do so with no one else present. At her level, she can easily have someone there to take the quizzes for her. So listen to Linda Yaccarino give speeches, and answer questions. Does she speak plainly, like Trump, where you get human answers? Or do her speeches and her answers make your brain hurt? Go to an on-line BS generator, and you will see the same verbiage that you hear from Linda Yaccarino.
    28
  5. 28
  6. 23
  7. 23
  8. 22
  9. President Trump was having seemingly daily question and answer sessions with the press. He was constantly engaging the press, every time he traveled to and from the White House. He stood there and took question after question after question. President Trump also routinely had meetings with guests, and invited the press, who asked questions and President Trump answered. President Trump also routinely had meetings with his cabinet and others, and the press was present, and they asked questions, and President Trump answered. President Trump was constantly engaging the press. President* Biden is constantly avoiding the press. President Trump was constantly meeting with foreign heads of state. President* Biden is constantly avoiding meeting with foreign heads of state. There is no way the press can cover this up for a lengthy period of time. Yes, they are all on Biden's side. But even Houdini could not hide Biden's mental state. This is going to become headline news, globally, and within a month or two. By the way: Do not feel sorry for him. He is a vicious person. He cares about no one other than Biden. He is corrupt. His family is corrupt. Biden would feed you to the sharks (so to speak), he would ruin your life, in an instant, if he got any political capital from your sorrow. The Democrats voted him in, and they knew his mental state. The Media (more Democrats) voted him in, and they knew his mental state. The big tech companies (more Democrats) barred free speech on an unprecedented scale, to help Biden, and they knew his mental state. Hold all of them accountable for the disaster that they created.
    13
  10. 13
  11. 12
  12. 11
  13. Windows, especially version 10, is a spyware OS, the likes the world has never imagined. It tracks every keystroke, every file access, every mouse click. If you want to protect your privacy, and to a large degree your security, then stop using Windows. Stop using google (use duckduckgo.com). Stop using facebook. Etc. Use an open source Linux OS. There are scores of distributions to choose from, and they are all free and all (or nearly all) are open-source. If you want one that makes ease of use a priority, then install Linux Mint. Go to distrowatch.com for information on just about every Linux offering and where do download it from. As to Open Office (and this also applies to Libre Office): It is spyware free. Why? They make their source code available for download. Meaning, people (programmers) anywhere on the planet can and do read that source code. They would love nothing more than to catch some sneaky code. So there is none. With that source code, you can compile the installation files yourself, and install the Office suite. You can compare what you compile to the already compiled installation files that are free to download. Running "fc.exe" on the two will reveal that they are identical. Meaning, no BS for Open Office, and no BS for Libre Office. As to Windows anti-virus: I recommend Webroot. Lastly, if you are unsure about installing Linux, you can install Oracle's free and open-source Virtual Box. That will allow you to create a Linux (or any other OS) machine that runs on your Windows machine. It will run much slower (because it is running virtually). But it allows you to use the Linux distro to see if you like it, and without risk. And Linux has endless free and open-source programs to do 99.9% of everything you do on a Windows machine. All open-source. All free. All safe. Cheers!
    10
  14. 10
  15. 8
  16. 8
  17. 8
  18. 7
  19. 7
  20. 6
  21. 6
  22. 5
  23. 5
  24. 5
  25. 5
  26. 5
  27. 4
  28. 4
  29. 4
  30. 3
  31. I believe that $2,000,000,000,000.00 will be cut. Here's why: -- We have brilliant businessmen combing the books. Those businessmen will be bringing in teams of other brilliant businessmen. -- There will be incentives, to finding cuts, and actually executing on those cuts. If need be, I believe that Musk might offer incentives out of his own pocket, and write it off on his taxes. So there will be a strong incentive for his team to make the cuts a reality. -- Anyone employed in the Executive branch of the government can be fired by President Trump. So even if it takes an act of congress to close down an agency, President Trump can still fire everyone in that agency (or, perhaps, 90% of the personnel in each agency, if some legitimate need exists to keep a few people) -- and he will fire just about all of them. -- Deals will probably be made, for Washington swamp dwellers to avoid prosecution, by turning state's evidence on higher ranking personnel involved in criminality. -- Anyone on record that spent $10,000 or more on anything clearly frivolous, will probably be criminally charged. They will have their day in court. But as the arrests pile up, watch how fast the rats run for cover, and plead for leniency; willing to sing like a bird, to avoid prison time. Folks, this time around, President Trump will not be new to the job. He will not make mistakes, like he did with Nikki Haley, Mike Pence, Reince Priebus, Jeff Sessions, and other RINOs. This time around, President Trump knows his way around. Also, President Trump is not going to take orders from anyone. President Trump is not going to be distracted by anyone. President Trump is not going to be delayed by anyone. President Trump will not care if they do another impeachment. This time around, President Trump is going to flex his authority and roll over anyone in the way of draining the swamp. I expect President Trump to exceed my expectations. We are going to see a change, for the better, in the federal government like no one can imagine.
    3
  32. 3
  33. 3
  34. 3
  35. 3
  36. 3
  37. 3
  38. 3
  39. 3
  40. 3
  41. 3
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. All storage mediums (with the exception of punch cards), no matter how much care is taken, are subject to data fade. The magnetism that denotes zeros and ones will, over some long period of time, become unreliable for a portion of the stored data. This will probably take 10+ years to be an issue, or even longer. The drive can still be 100% functional, and still have a few zeros or ones get lost. This is easily remedied. Every few years, copy your storage drive to another storage drive. Then format or erase or delete the data from the original drive, and copy it back, again. New magnetic adhesion will now be with the data on the originating drive (the old data is now newly written, starting the data fade clock from day 1). And if you have used less than half of your storage drive, you can simply create a new directory (or partition), copy everything there, and then back to its original location. But make sure that the data actually gets copied back to its original location (and the the computer does not ignore copying files because the files still exist -- the files must be written, anew, to the original location). And keep a minimum of two drives that have the same data. Ideally, three drives works well, because you can keep your working drive and a duplicate drive in your home, and you can keep the third drive at a friend or family member who live elsewhere. This protects you from loss due to fire or a burglary. -- You pay zero to google or anyone else to store your data. -- You need not trust google, microsoft, etc, with your data. -- You are never at the mercy of your internet connection, in the event that you need your backup data. -- Your up-front cost is minimal. -- You remain in control of your data. By the way, stop using Windows (especially version 10). It tracks every keystroke, every mouse click, and every file access. Use one of the scores of free, open-source Linux operating systems. They contain no spyware or tracking or privacy issues. Unsure which Linux distribution to use and want it to be user friendly? Then install Linux Mint. https://distrowatch.com/ will have links to "mirrors" from where you can download just about any Linux distribution on the planet. Linux: Almost without exception: Free, open-source, reliable, bug free, virus free, less vulnerable to attacks, and faster than Windows. Cheers!
    1
  62. 1
  63. Two additional BS terms, coined by radical leftists: 1) Sanctuary cities. Sanctuaries are for innocent people seeking refuge from political tyrants; not for law breaking border crossers. Those people are criminals. As such, they are fugitives from justice. Ergo, cities that protect criminals -- cities that protect fugitives are "Fugitive cities". Never call them sanctuary cities. The "sanctuary" adjective implies goodness. So radical leftists turned that adjective on its head to make organized, government run, criminal crossings, sound benevolent, by calling cities that protect the criminals "sanctuaries". When you give aid and comfort to criminals, then you are co-conspirators. Always call those cities "fugitive cities". 2) Critical race theory: There is nothing critical about a fabricated, race baiting, divisive, hateful, get rich scheme. Just as CNN and NBC are fake news channels, so it is with "Fake critical race theory". FCRT is critical only to those that profit from its BS agenda, and critical only to those that spread its propaganda. What's next?: Critical gender theory? Critical child sex theory? Critical defund the police theory? Always refer to it as "fake critical race theory" (FCRT), the same as referring to some channels as "Fake News". Whenever you hear an expression by the radical left, and it makes your brain hurt, then take a moment to dissect their expression, and you will find a gross misuse of the meaning of words. Or to put it another way, an attempt to re-define language. Never let them get away with it. Never use their language. Always correct their language. If you use their language, then you give credence to their language.
    1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. There is one camera angle that clearly shows President* Biden stopping, and (first) putting down his left foot. He is now stopped and resting on his left foot. Two seconds later, he leans over to his right foot, and does not pull his heel back, resulting in his toes still in the toe clip, and he falls. Two things: 1) The media's BS excuse is just that. It is BS, because President* Biden was already stopped, stable, and in control of his stance. So he knew how to remove his left foot from the toe clip. Two seconds later, he forgets how to remove his right foot from the toe clip. That is a sign of mental decline. 2) Toe clips are ancient. Any reputable bicycle store would warn you against using toe clips, and they probably do not sell them. 99% of riders use platform pedals. Avid cyclists, athletes, competitive riders, etc, use "clip-less" pedals (which is a confusing name, because you clip in to the clip-less pedals). They are called "clip-less" because they do not have toe clips (Biden has toe clips). The way that athletes (such as in the Tour de France) clip in is by wearing cycling shoes, where on the bottom of the shoes it clips into the pedals. This helps the riders climb hills, because while one foot is pushing down, the other foot is pulling up. It also helps on bumpy terrain, and mountain biking, by stopping your feet from falling off of the pedals. But toe clips are known, for decades, to be dangerous. President* Biden's bicycle is probably 40+ years old. In summary, President* Biden put his left foot down, was stable, and then leaned over to his right foot and forgot what to do. That is due to his mental state.
    1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. People that say that people of color cannot be racists are either: -- using that moronic excuse to shut down dialog (by the way, do not accept that BS from them). -- racists, themselves (so they will say anything to offend white people). -- brainwashed. -- stupid. And it is often a combination of the above. Asserting that only white people can be racist is beyond absurd. There are racists in every group. Also know that most people, by a vast majority, are not racist. Just as most people do not rape, kill, and riot. But when, perhaps, 0.001% of the population commits heinous acts, it is those acts that make headlines. It is the fact that since law breakers are not the norm that they make the news. So do not make that let you believe that that is the norm, or even wide-spread. It is not. What you see on TV is not what you see when you spend your day. The TV amplifies the exceptions to society's norms. So remember that they are exceptions, and not representative of real life -- not even close. We all see that the media ignores news worthy items that would spread good cheer and lift up society, and, instead, cherry-pick stories that inflame the gullible. And there are so few of these stories that the radical left media fabricates stories and outright lies about events, because they are no different than ANTIFA, except that they dress for the studio's cameras. ANTIFA is more than the psychos in the street; they include the seemingly well-mannered fake news anchors that rev up the mobs. Cheers!
    1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146.  @andrewlangley9507  The IV Amendment to The Constitution Of The United States Of America reads: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. " The above is describing what is spelled out in an affidavit. If the affidavit were to be provided, contingent upon charges being filed, then the government could break into anyone's home, never intending to file charges. The government would have no restraint at going into anyone's home, taking whatever they want, and never having to offer justification for doing so. When the government breaks into your home, they must justify exactly why they did so, with specificity. They are not permitted to go on an Easter Egg hunt. They must spell out exactly what it is that they are searching for, regardless of whether or not they find what they were looking for, and regardless of whether or not they file charges. If the Justice Department does not provide President Trump with the full, unredacted affidavit, a court will order them to do so. And since this involves President Trump, it will quickly reach the Supreme Court, and President Trump will easily win his case, and probably by a 9-0 ruling. Also, if the Justice Department forces President Trump to take them to court, even the radical left media will not be able to effectively spin this. And since they all know that President Trump will prevail if this goes to court, there is no way that the Justice Department is going to screw around with this. What concerns me is the possibility of the FBI seizing everything in sight (not looking for anything specific), and when they later find something of interest, they will produce an affidavit based on what they found. That is, of course, wildly illegal. But that is what a tyrannical government does. President Trump and his lawyers are too smart for all of this. If the affidavit is held back, then its authenticity is gone. If that also goes to court, it will be another slam dunk win in the courts for President Trump. The constitution does not allow for "break in now", and we will show you the paperwork when we feel like it.
    1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1