Comments by "Perhaps" (@NoEgg4u) on "m o d e r n i t y"
channel.
-
60
-
Absent from this video are the names of the specific people that run the museum.
What are their names, and what are their titles.
Photos of them would also be welcome.
When any conservative is in the news on NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, or on facebook or any other leftist platform, they name the conservative person, list the conservative person's title, and they show photos or video of the conservative person.
But when normal people are reporting on radical leftists that are destroying society, we give cover to those radical leftists. We leave them to be anonymous.
We hear about the harm they are causing, without knowing who they are. And then we complain to each other in the comment section.
Let's have some accountability. Shine a light on those people. Do not allow them to operate with anonymity. They never do so with conservatives.
No physical harm should befall them. But they should be held accountable in the news and in the world of social media. They should be shamed.
7
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
For those who are not aware...
TikTok, used by China's population, is the opposite of what we are shoveled here in the USA.
In Chia, it is an educational tool. All of the filth and debauchery fed to USA's teens is absent for TikTok's teens in China.
----------
On the topic of banning TikTok in the USA, that is great, if the bill was specific for TikTok.
But it is only a matter of time when another radical leftist gets elected into the presidency, and then tyranny will strike all conservative social media.
As bad as TikTok is, the bill, in its current form, will be far worse for America in the long run.
The conservatives in congress should write a TikTok specific bill, with no wiggle room for abuse with other social media platforms.
Radical leftists have shown us that they will lie, cheat, and steal to win elections and turn us into a communist country. With the current bill, they will 100% use and abuse it, against free speech.
3
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
Please note the "super pinned" comment, directly below the video (atop the title of the video, with a light-blue background). That super pinned comment stays visible throughout the entire video.
An anonymous youtube employee posted her comment, above all other comments. Her comment cannot be removed. Her comment has no reply button. Her comment has a colored background, to stand out above all other comments.
youtube's executives claim that they are not editors, granting them Section 230 of the Communications and Decency Act protections, shielding youtube from lawsuits. Yet, here we see an anonymous youtube employee being an editor. She is chiming in (that is editing), and she is doing so in a way that is superior to every other comment.
And this is not an accident by youtube's executives. It is not magic that allows this web page to have that functionality. youtube's executives ordered their programmers to grant anonymous youtube employees that screen real-estate for their personal views.
How many of us would love to have our propaganda stand out, atop all other comments, with a colored background, where even the channel's host cannot remove it or reply to it?
When will the Department Of Justice remove youtube's Section 230 protections?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Radical leftist writers develop a character to be a pig and a villain. Once the writers are satisfied that the character is universally despised, it is only then that the writers have that character espouse normal, conservative values.
Gullible audience members connect imaginary dots, that since they despise that character, then of course his normal, conservative values are wrong and to be disliked.
But if the writers started off that same character by showing him to be normal, conservative, and having his priorities in order, then when he exposes woke nonsense, the audience would be on board with his statements.
Although there are exceptions, no normal, conservative man would do and say or do the awful things we witnessed in the build up of that character. The show's writers did that in order to convey a message that normal, conservative men have mental issues.
Do people do and say those horrible things? Some do. And they are nearly all radical leftists.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Either he is seriously mentally disturbed, or he is deliberately seeking attention for his self esteem and monetary gain -- or both.
We will never see a story about him giving birth. If there is any follow-up, it will be him claiming that he had a miscarriage (seeking yet more attention and monetary gain), or he will hold up a friend's baby and claim it came from him.
Aside from Truth Social, all of the well known social media platforms suspend accounts, or label postings as misinformation, or fact check postings, or ban accounts, for the smallest of infractions (such as correctly gendering someone). Yet, when we have a complete train wreck of a posting, we hear crickets from the platform's administrators.
There is an old saying about inmates running the asylum.
As it pertains to propaganda outlets (also known as news outlets), and as it pertains to social media outlets, we are living in a time where the sickest among us are running those platforms.
They are smart people. But they are sick, evil people. Sick, evil, and smart is a dangerous combination.
1
-
1
-
@0:56 -- A sincere apology is one that allocutes to the offense (or crime).
Nowhere did Tuba Bozkurt state what she did.
She called it an "interruption".
You know what else would be an "interruption"? Having your cell phone ring.
"Nothing is further from my mind than to create the impression of ridicule..."
So she is denying that she ridiculed the murder of police officer Rouven Laur, and implies that we got the wrong impression.
Here is what an actual, sincere apology looks like:
"I am apologizing for my rude, uncivil, callus laughter about the murder of police officer Rouven Laur."
"Now that I am repenting, I humbly ask the family and friends of officer Rouven Laur, and his colleagues, and this government body, which I shamed, to forgive me."
"Effective tomorrow, I am resigning from my elected office, as my act is that of a person that does not deserve the honor of holding my office."
But instead, Tuba Bozkurt had her staff put together an non-apology, apology.
1
-
1
-
Ben Shapiro is right on almost every topic. One exception is to know when to not say exactly what is on your mind (have a filter).
Ben Shapiro will be so truthful, to support his position, that he is willing to wreck support for his own causes, just to vent or make his position known.
When you have someone on your team that is highly productive in her activities, you do not bash that person to the world, because one of her points rubbed you the wrong way.
If Ben had said that he spoke to Candace about what she said, and asked for clarification, or that he asked Candace to release a statement clarifying what she said, and she refused, then Ben should have said that he had that discussion with her.
But for him to go straight to the megaphone, and bash a gem on his team, shows Ben's lack of business acumen.
Ben has done this with others, including President Trump.
Ben seems to not understand that no one is perfect (or that no one will mirror his positions 100%).
Ben seems to not understand that you do not take on every single battle, at the expense of winning the war (in a manner of speaking).
You will never hear a democrat bash their cohorts. They focus on the end game -- the win for power. Ben does not do that, even though if conservatives were to control the government, things would improve for all honest Americans. Ben will run over a conservative, and lose the election, just to make his position known.
As smart as Ben is, he needs to smarten up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1