Comments by "Perhaps" (@NoEgg4u) on "Fox News"
channel.
-
86
-
25
-
@1:04 "An activist..."
That was not an activist.
Activists conduct themselves in a legal fashion.
Activists march, hold up signs, hold rallies, make speeches, organize gatherings, etc.
The man that was killed by the police was a criminal. He was not an activist.
Please never call the actions of criminals "activists". Why?
Since being an activist is legal, and even celebrated by normal people, to then equate violent, criminal actions with being an activist will inadvertently give credence to the criminal's actions (being an activist is legal, and by extension, if activists burn down buildings, then burning down buildings will be construed as legal).
An activist and a criminal are miles apart from each other.
One is legal, and protected by our Constitution / Bill Of Rights.
The other is an attack on our freedoms and contempt for the rule of law.
16
-
10
-
8
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
1
-
Musk is likely looking at relocating Twitter to Texas or Florida, etc.
But one step at a time.
He first has to get his staff (the normal, non-woke, non-destructive people) to fully grasp all of the nuances of Twitter's hardware, software, and networking.
Once that is done, and they can map out a new location, as well as coordinating the networking between the old location and the new location (there will be a period when both sites are live), and finally conducting a planned, orderly shutdown of the old location, he will vacate San Francisco's data center.
There is also the problem of staff either relocating to the new location, or hiring new staff already residing at the new location.
This is a huge undertaking, and must be carefully planned out.
Musk has the resources to undertake this endeavor, and I will lay odds that it is already on his radar.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@3:18 "...for both genders. For all genders. Whatever."
That is an example of caving in to the radical left's brainwashing.
Dana Perino's brain has been infiltrated.
Once you acknowledge that more than two genders exist, you have been indoctrinated. Not necessarily in a major way. But the radical leftists have made headway with her.
Even if Perino does not believe it, she is brainwashed to the extent that she propagates the nonsense.
She caught herself saying "both genders", and corrected her language (even though her language was correct). And that is a win for the radical leftist's agenda.
For her to correct herself, where no correction is proper, is a sign of her accepting the propaganda of more than two genders.
She said "both genders", and should have left it at that, because there are only two genders, and she knows that there are only two genders. Yet, she caved in to the propaganda, and for that moment, became a tool for the propagandists.
By the way...
If a teacher wants to teach students about feelings, then that should be in a "feelings" class; not in a math class.
Just as class on learning Spanish should not include learning how to repair automobiles.
Leave it to radical leftists to wreck all that is good.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The mainstream media is the unofficial, non declared propaganda arm of the Democrat National Committee.
Take any radical leftist democrats (house representatives, senators, mayors, governors, etc), and swap them with any radical leftists on CNN or NBC, and you will hear the exact same propaganda, and have the exact same votes take place.
Half of the radical leftists hold public offices, and half of the radical leftists churn out media propaganda. They are the same organization. They just wear different hats.
And facebook, twitter, and google are part of that same group.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@2:40 "Now he's (Hunter Biden) an artist"
No, he is not an artist.
Yes, he sells art. But that does not make him an artist.
I sold my car. That does not make me an auto manufacturer.
Hunter Biden sells art to as a cover for selling access to the Oval Office.
No one has ever seen Hunter create art.
No one has ever seen Hunter make a single brush stroke.
The media has never asked Hunter from where he purchases his art supplies.
No one has ever checked with the art store (any art store) to verify that Hunter made purchases for his art related supplies.
No one has ever asked Hunter how he chooses his brushes.
No one has ever asked Hunter how he chooses his canvases.
No one has ever asked Hunter from where does he get his inspiration for art he claims he created.
No one has ever asked Hunter if he ever had formal training -- did he ever take an art class of have a private tutor, and to name the class and/or the tutor.
No one has ever asked Hunter for how long he has been painting. And why did he start painting only recently? And if he claims he has been painting for decades, then where are those paintings?
I am not an artist, and even I know several questions that the media should ask Hunter.
Imagine if the media spoke to a few real artists, to comprise a list of art related questions.
Folks, please never (really -- never) lose sight that we are dealing with radical leftist criminals. They lie and they lie and they lie.
Just because Hunter claims he is an artist, or just because he puts paintings up for sale, do not believe his assertion that he is an artist.
Hunter Biden is not an artist. Hunter Biden sells paintings that some other anonymous person is painting.
Like his father, Hunter Biden is a career criminal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Rambleism I wrote to you:
"For the sake of making a point, let's assume that Trump is guilty of every offense ever thrown at him...
Elwood Rambler, please tell us how that gives Schumer a free pass to threaten Supreme Court Justices."
You replied with:
"Perhaps ... what threat though?🤷♂️ Talk about making something out of nothing. Isn’t that something you just shrug off in life? They’re big boys they can handle themselves. Trump threatens woman over the internet while they are doing their duty and testifying 🤦♂️ is that better or worse intimidation? Did you call him out?"
1) Changing the subject to Trump is a typical dodge, used by people that either do not know what they are talking about, or are unwilling to admit that they are wrong. You qualify for both.
The topic of this video is about Schumer threatening Supreme Court Justices. As eager as you are to change the topic to be about Trump, it is not about Trump. Try to stay focused.
2) For you to ask "what threat though?" is moronic. Yes, I am calling you a moron, because we are commenting on a video where Schumer threatens Supreme Court Justices, and you expect us to believe your comment rather than the video of Schumer making the threats. You might as well write "What does Schumer have to do with this? He is not in the video". That would be equally ridiculous of you to expect us to believe.
Do you understand how utterly stupid you come across, when you ask "what threat" when commenting on a video that contains the threat; a video whose purpose is to put a spotlight on the threat, and you ask "what threat". Really. Take a breath and think about how incredibly stupid your are coming across.
I do not normally call people stupid. But your assertion of no threat, in a video containing a threat, is the equivalent of holding a "call me stupid" sign.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@0:14 "...signatures has been verified"
Why were they verified?
Newsom's policy position, as well as his radical leftist's party's position, is no verification for voting.
-- Show up and vote -- no questions asked.
-- Mail in your vote -- no questions asked.
-- Vote early -- no questions asked.
-- Vote late -- no questions asked.
@0:58 "Who knows (why people say things)" -- Answer:
Cuomo's accusers know.
Cuomo spewed a list of reasons for why people accused him of sexual assault and sending infected Covid-19 patients into nursing homes.
Intentionally omitted from his list was:
"When numerous people, mostly from your own party, all accuse you of sexual assault, and when government records show that you forced nursing homes to take Covid-19 patients, it is the truth".
That's right. He left out from his list that when numerous, responsible, credible, people make the same accusation, they are telling the truth.
Telling the "truth" was left off of his list.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@0:47 "...they wouldn't be bringing in people to the grand jury, unless they believed that have cause to do so."
Unfortunately, Jonathan Turley has yet to grasp the depravity of the radical left, and the tyrannical use of the Justice Department.
Jonathan Turley sees everything through the eyes of the legal process, as written.
He is blind to the criminal use of, and weaponization of, the police state.
The radical left went for years, accusing President Trump of every crime under the sun, including a never ending Russia, Russia, Russia trial (of sorts).
And yet Jonathan Turley still believes that the radical left would not be having a grand jury proceeding unless they had evidence.
Of course the radical left would do so. They will put on a theatrical performance for the jurors, enough to bring an indictment. And they primed the jury pool by having years of Trump bashing, and weeks of January 6th hearings that were all political theater.
Their goal is to put President Trump on trial, which to millions of people would mean that he is guilty. Many people believe that if you are on trial, you must be guilty.
That is enough to possibly keep President Trump from returning to the Oval Office -- and that is the radical left's end game.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes, it is smart to keep a supply of ventilators on hand. You do not want to wait for them, after you already need them. You certainly do not want to run out.
But hoarding ventilators (same as people are hoarding toilet paper, sanitizer, etc) can result in suffering and deaths when that life-saving equipment is needed elsewhere.
1) The ventilators are not toys. They are built to medical standards. They are expensive, and they take huge resources to manufacture the parts, build the units, and test the units.
2) If and when a new outbreak of the virus shows up somewhere other than New York, will Cuomo ship his not-in-use stockpile to save the lives of non New York Americans?
Will there be a red-tape delay to find that stockpile and get it shipped? It is not like the federal government can just snap their fingers and 10,000 more ventilators appear.
3) Tying up personnel to manufacture tens of thousands of ventilators, for a demand that is not present (only projected under worst case scenario), means that those people are not contributing their time and labor towards other immediate needs that are related to this crisis.
Cuomo said nothing about an "apex" when he sounded the emergency alarm that New York needed tens of thousands of ventilators. It is only after he was questioned as to why so many ventilators are being stockpiled by him, and he still wants more, that he now qualifies that they are for the "apex".
How is the President expected to manage the unimaginable demands on his office, when he cannot count on the people that are making the demands to be accurate or, at a minimum, be reasonable?
1
-
@0:35 "..you couldn't buy a cannon"
Folks, we must, must, must assume that everything that President* Biden says is from La-La-Land. He says whatever he feels like saying, as if he knows what he is talking about.
When the Second Amendment was passed, you could buy a cannon.
President* Biden either:
-- Lied
-- Is confused
-- Speaking gibberish while he tries to collect his thoughts
Probably a combination of the above.
Think about it...
If you were asked about whether or not citizens could buy a cannon, at the time our Second Amendment was passed, what would your answer be?
Most folks would not know the answer (why would they -- it is an obscure fact). So most folks would truthfully say: "I do not know"
Yet, President* Biden goes on national television and lies.
Clearly, he could not know that cannons were illegal -- because they were not illegal. Yet he said that they were illegal. So from where did he, the President* of our country, get his information?
Answer: He just made it up. He lied. He talks like he is smart, when he is a dolt.
And the media, including The Five, does not call him out on his nonsensical claim.
When we do not correct what President* Biden lies about, then his lies take root.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@3:03 "Why are you going to social media companies, and telling them that a story may be Russian disinformation, when you don't even quite know that yet."
Once again, a conservative, inadvertently giving cover to the radical left. What do I mean?
The question for Joe Concha is:
Joe, do you really believe that the FBI Director was unsure of what Hunter had on his laptop, and whether or not it was Russian disinformation?
Folks, of course Director Wray knew exactly what Hunter's laptop contained.
Of course Director Wray knew that Hunter's laptop was not Russian disinformation.
Of course Director Wray knew that his agency was colluding with facebook to swing the election.
Of course Director Wray knew that his agency was not trying to curtail misinformation, but rather, his agency was actively spreading disinformation.
Stop inadvertently defending people by way of implying that they did not know. Director Wray knew exactly what was on Hunter's laptop, and Director Wray knew exactly what his agency was doing with facebook.
Director Wray, and all of the people involved with spreading that disinformation, and interfering with 2020 election... all of them should be prosecuted.
Stop playing games with these people. They are not playing a game. They are ruthless people, seeking to gain power (enough is never enough for them), and the Constitution be damned (in their view). These people are not like the rest of us. They are smart, and they are evil. They have blatantly broken laws and committed high crimes that change election outcomes and endanger our freedoms. They are not clueless. They are not flying blind. They are not doing these things by mistake. So stop giving them the benefit of the doubt, as if they would have acted differently, if they had only known better.
Folks, you know that Hunter's laptop is Hunter's laptop, and that it is not Russian disinformation. You always knew that. And we are expected to believe that the Director of the FBI does not know?
It is absurd.
These people should be charged with the serious laws that they intentionally violated.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1