Comments by "Perhaps" (@NoEgg4u) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. @1:18 "(Schumer) He's got to apologize" Apologize? Schumer meant it. If he knew that he could get away with inciting people to physically attack those justices, he would. Civilized people keep mistakenly giving uncivilized swamp dwellers, like Schumer, the benefit of the doubt. As though if he apologized, we would believe him and we would all go camping together. Schumer is filth. He meant every word of his threats. Stop playing nice with these miscreants.
    86
  2. Any manager, that tells her staff that they do not have to respond to DOGE's inquire, should be fired. In fact, any employee, that tells any other employee to not respond, should be fired.
    25
  3. @1:04 "An activist..." That was not an activist. Activists conduct themselves in a legal fashion. Activists march, hold up signs, hold rallies, make speeches, organize gatherings, etc. The man that was killed by the police was a criminal. He was not an activist. Please never call the actions of criminals "activists". Why? Since being an activist is legal, and even celebrated by normal people, to then equate violent, criminal actions with being an activist will inadvertently give credence to the criminal's actions (being an activist is legal, and by extension, if activists burn down buildings, then burning down buildings will be construed as legal). An activist and a criminal are miles apart from each other. One is legal, and protected by our Constitution / Bill Of Rights. The other is an attack on our freedoms and contempt for the rule of law.
    16
  4. It is amazing how even a career person is willing to shame himself, nationally, based on politics; based on his hatred of our President. Vindman is an example of what is getting drained from the swamp.
    10
  5. Jesse Watters owes getting his foot in the door, to Bill O'Reilly. Jesse has earned his way. But he would still be in the mail room if not for Bill O'Reilly.
    8
  6. The schools should not capitulate. When the children return home, and their parents find out that the school did not feed them, then the parents will immediately get involved with the school's administration. At that point, the school's administration (the Principal / board members) should explain to the parents that President* Biden cut off the funding for the school's lunches. That will direct the parent's outrage to the responsible party: Biden. When an entire school is not feeding the children, there will be holy hell to pay from the parents. This will not be a few parents. This will be thousands of parents, and it will have to make headline news. This will bring national attention to President* Biden taking food out of the mouths of children. So when President* Biden makes a speech where he claims to empathize with you, remember this case. He cares zero about anyone. He is denying food to children. That is the action of an unfeeling, degenerate, lowlife tyrant. The school must not budge. If they do, then they will forever be a slave to the master in the oval office.
    4
  7. @0:20 "Why is the head of the judiciary committee purposely redefining what free speech, in fact, does mean?" Laura, please be careful to not inadvertently give credence to Durbin. What do I mean? Durbin did not redefine anything. Rather, Durbin attempted to redefine what free speech means. Phrasing your remark that Durbin did so (as opposed to Durbin trying to do so) conveys a different message. Please never imply that Durbin has that power -- to redefine words. He does not. The remainder of the video was spot-on. But not everyone watches entire videos, and the opening remarks are important. Two words: Durbin is tyrant.
    4
  8. @2:56 "We got our flash drive back, today, and that's great" Tucker, the contents of that flash drive can no longer be trusted, as they might have been tampered with. In fact, it might not be the same flash drive. There are very secure methods of doing encrypted file transfers over the internet. So you might as well use such a method, which will be faster and more reliable than a physical delivery service.
    4
  9. It makes no difference who has the laptop. What matters is who has a copy (an image) of the storage drive that was in the laptop. The data saved in the laptop can be easily duplicated, over and over and over, so that an infinite number of parties can scour the data. I assure you that there are already countless copies of the data in the hands of many, many people. It is only a matter of time before the image of Hunter Biden's data gets shared with the public via any number of internet sites. Cheers!
    3
  10. The title of this video: "Dem leaders beginning to understand border crisis", conveys that @Fox News does not understand the Democrat party. Implying that Dem leaders did not understand the border crisis is attributing their actions to their stupidity. The Dem leaders are not stupid. The border crisis is their agenda. The border crisis is the platform. The border crisis is their intentional design. The Dem leaders care about nothing other than holding on to power, just as heroin addicts will do anything to get their fix. The Dem leaders are flushing our nation down the toilet, deliberately, in order to bring in votes for their party, which keeps them in power. Just as in other countries where life becomes miserable under tyrannical government control, the people running those governments live high on the hog. The Dems, here, are no different. They care absolutely nothing about The People. They care only about themselves.
    3
  11. And the Democrats in Illinois will re-elect the same corrupt people to govern their state. If Osama bin Laden was resurrected and ran as a Democrat, they would vote for him, too.
    3
  12. The assumption that Stacey Abrams knew that she would be in trouble for that photo is assuming that Stacey Abrams is intelligent. She is not. So what is Stacey Abrams?: Stacey Abrams is an ignorant elitist. In her mind, she is better than everyone in the room. In her mind, she calls the shots, and is exempt from her own edicts. Stacey Abrams is ignorant and arrogant. Please do not assign the reasoning for her posting her own photo on twitter as a slip-up. She posted that photo to show the country that she stands out from the crowd; that she is special.
    2
  13. CNN is reporting that Joe Manchin said "No", due to a dog whistle from President Trump, via orders from Putin.
    1
  14. Musk is likely looking at relocating Twitter to Texas or Florida, etc. But one step at a time. He first has to get his staff (the normal, non-woke, non-destructive people) to fully grasp all of the nuances of Twitter's hardware, software, and networking. Once that is done, and they can map out a new location, as well as coordinating the networking between the old location and the new location (there will be a period when both sites are live), and finally conducting a planned, orderly shutdown of the old location, he will vacate San Francisco's data center. There is also the problem of staff either relocating to the new location, or hiring new staff already residing at the new location. This is a huge undertaking, and must be carefully planned out. Musk has the resources to undertake this endeavor, and I will lay odds that it is already on his radar.
    1
  15. @1:07 Fox News is giving the benefit of the doubt to the Washington Post. The WP did not fail to look at the entire video. They did look at the entire video. They did not make a careless mistake. Rather, they made a conscious decision to lie. They are so wrapped up in the own power and arrogance, that they print whatever gives themselves a woody. They hate President Trump, and they hate anyone that does not hate President Trump. That is their singular reason for lying. @1:52 Again, giving the slime the benefit of the doubt. The apologies were not based on them watching the full video, after the fact. The apologies were based on them being called out by reputable media; by them having egg on their faces.
    1
  16. From what sources is bottled water obtained? How do we know that Nestle / Poland Spring, etc, do not use runoffs of that contaminated water?
    1
  17. The question, that the title of this video asks, could be more generic: "Are liberals overreacting to (fill in the blank)?" The answer is always "Yes".
    1
  18. @3:18 "...for both genders. For all genders. Whatever." That is an example of caving in to the radical left's brainwashing. Dana Perino's brain has been infiltrated. Once you acknowledge that more than two genders exist, you have been indoctrinated. Not necessarily in a major way. But the radical leftists have made headway with her. Even if Perino does not believe it, she is brainwashed to the extent that she propagates the nonsense. She caught herself saying "both genders", and corrected her language (even though her language was correct). And that is a win for the radical leftist's agenda. For her to correct herself, where no correction is proper, is a sign of her accepting the propaganda of more than two genders. She said "both genders", and should have left it at that, because there are only two genders, and she knows that there are only two genders. Yet, she caved in to the propaganda, and for that moment, became a tool for the propagandists. By the way... If a teacher wants to teach students about feelings, then that should be in a "feelings" class; not in a math class. Just as class on learning Spanish should not include learning how to repair automobiles. Leave it to radical leftists to wreck all that is good.
    1
  19. Two words: Biden crime family.
    1
  20. The title of this video is inadvertently defending Patrisse Cullors' scam. Why? Yes, Patrisse Cullors said that she was triggered. Maybe when you steal $90,000,000.00 you might lie? When a criminal makes a statement, that does not make her statement a fact. So when Patrisse Cullors states that she is "triggered", she is lying. Therefore, @Fox News should not assert, via the title of their posting, that Patrisse Cullers is "triggered".
    1
  21. ...waiting for CNN to report that Putin gave Trump orders to shoot down the plane.
    1
  22. @Fox News: Cities that harbor fugitives from the law are not "sanctuary" cities. Rather, they are "fugitive" cities. Sanctuaries are for people fleeing persecution, which is not the case for 99.99% of illegal aliens. Providing aid and comfort to criminals is illegal. All government officials that provide aid and comfort to criminals are co-conspirators. All mayors and governors and law enforcement officials swear an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. There is no "aiding and abetting criminals" provision in our constitution. Stop blaming the cities, and start blaming the specific people that run those cities. Stop repeated the clown world language of the radical left, who came up with "sanctuary cities", and start using normal language, and call them "fugitive cities".
    1
  23. The mainstream media is the unofficial, non declared propaganda arm of the Democrat National Committee. Take any radical leftist democrats (house representatives, senators, mayors, governors, etc), and swap them with any radical leftists on CNN or NBC, and you will hear the exact same propaganda, and have the exact same votes take place. Half of the radical leftists hold public offices, and half of the radical leftists churn out media propaganda. They are the same organization. They just wear different hats. And facebook, twitter, and google are part of that same group.
    1
  24. Two words: President Kamala Harris
    1
  25. Inviting any teams, other than the winning team, is an insult to the winning team. It is like winning the gold at the Olympics, and having the 2nd place athlete share your center podium position. It is like winning a boxing match, and the referee holds up the loser's arm, too. It is like winning the Nobel prize, and the person you beat gets the same accolades. It is like winning an academy award, and the losers share your moment on the stage. An invitation to meet the President is an honor (well, that is questionable with Biden). To give that honor to the losing team is an insult to the winning team, who earned that invitation.
    1
  26. Because the student used a word that the professor deems demeaning to women, the professor punished a woman.
    1
  27. @9:45 "Hillary Clinton thinks the election was stolen from her" Why? Because she says so? Hillary cannot live with her loss. So she lies about the election being stolen from her. Her ego needs to tell everyone that she was the winner. But she knows that she lost. Hillary is a habitual liar. So why believe her when she says that the election was stolen from her? The truth is that she is lying.
    1
  28. @3:41 "It's even more inexplicable that she's gonna keep running (Nancy Pelosi)..." It is perfectly clear why she will keep running. -- Pelosi cares zero about our country. -- Pelosi cares zero about justice. -- Pelosi cares zero about our constitution (except when it protects her). Pelosi is in it for Pelosi. Folks, never take on the mind-set that people like Pelosi are committed to serving the public. Forget that her role is that of a public servant. Pelosi sees her role as wielding power and enriching herslef. Pelosi is exactly what is wrong with having someone like her in public service, because she does not serve the public -- she serves herself. People that seem bewildered at why politicians like Pelosi do what they do are forever oblivious in seeing her for what she really is. Stop assigning ignorance or mistakes to her actions. She is akin to a crafty career criminal.
    1
  29. The title of this video is misleading. It is not Joe Rogan's controversy. It is Neil Young's woke attempt to be relevant controversy.
    1
  30. Those "transgender" athletes are not "transgender". Everything about them is their natural gender, as they were given at inception, and were recorded at birth. Just because a man claims he is a woman, does not make him a woman. No amount of eye shadow and lipstick makes him a woman. These are pathetic men that cheat at competition, by not competing against their own gender. They put on an act and claim that they are women, in order to cheat.
    1
  31. Two words: I hate myself.
    1
  32.  @Jules-z4e  According to President* Biden, it is 2.
    1
  33. CNN is reporting that Avenatti stole from Stormy Daniels, due to a dog whistle from President Trump, via orders from Putin.
    1
  34. CNN is reporting that they fired Cuomo, based on a whistle call from President Trump, via orders from Putin.
    1
  35. @2:40 "Now he's (Hunter Biden) an artist" No, he is not an artist. Yes, he sells art. But that does not make him an artist. I sold my car. That does not make me an auto manufacturer. Hunter Biden sells art to as a cover for selling access to the Oval Office. No one has ever seen Hunter create art. No one has ever seen Hunter make a single brush stroke. The media has never asked Hunter from where he purchases his art supplies. No one has ever checked with the art store (any art store) to verify that Hunter made purchases for his art related supplies. No one has ever asked Hunter how he chooses his brushes. No one has ever asked Hunter how he chooses his canvases. No one has ever asked Hunter from where does he get his inspiration for art he claims he created. No one has ever asked Hunter if he ever had formal training -- did he ever take an art class of have a private tutor, and to name the class and/or the tutor. No one has ever asked Hunter for how long he has been painting. And why did he start painting only recently? And if he claims he has been painting for decades, then where are those paintings? I am not an artist, and even I know several questions that the media should ask Hunter. Imagine if the media spoke to a few real artists, to comprise a list of art related questions. Folks, please never (really -- never) lose sight that we are dealing with radical leftist criminals. They lie and they lie and they lie. Just because Hunter claims he is an artist, or just because he puts paintings up for sale, do not believe his assertion that he is an artist. Hunter Biden is not an artist. Hunter Biden sells paintings that some other anonymous person is painting. Like his father, Hunter Biden is a career criminal.
    1
  36. @0:07 "...in this gun control protest..." -- fake news. Why? That was not a protest. That was a riot. Protesting is, by definition, peaceful. Those rioters were anything but peaceful. Never water down criminal behavior by calling the criminals "activists" or "protesters". We all have the right to protest. That is a constitutional right. There is no constitutional right to riot, and threaten physical harm, or violently / physically attack people. Those people were not protesters. Do not call them protesters.
    1
  37. The New York Times must be desperate for subscriptions, because they are one of the unofficial propaganda arms for the Democrat National Committee. So to remain in business, the New York Times is actually going to investigate real corruption in their own Democrat party.
    1
  38. Lightfoot fungus.
    1
  39.  @Rambleism  For the sake of making a point, let's assume that Trump is guilty of every offense ever thrown at him... Elwood Rambler, please tell us how that gives Schumer a free pass to threaten Supreme Court Justices.
    1
  40.  @Rambleism  I wrote to you: "For the sake of making a point, let's assume that Trump is guilty of every offense ever thrown at him... Elwood Rambler, please tell us how that gives Schumer a free pass to threaten Supreme Court Justices." You replied with: "Perhaps ... what threat though?🤷‍♂️ Talk about making something out of nothing. Isn’t that something you just shrug off in life? They’re big boys they can handle themselves. Trump threatens woman over the internet while they are doing their duty and testifying 🤦‍♂️ is that better or worse intimidation? Did you call him out?" 1) Changing the subject to Trump is a typical dodge, used by people that either do not know what they are talking about, or are unwilling to admit that they are wrong. You qualify for both. The topic of this video is about Schumer threatening Supreme Court Justices. As eager as you are to change the topic to be about Trump, it is not about Trump. Try to stay focused. 2) For you to ask "what threat though?" is moronic. Yes, I am calling you a moron, because we are commenting on a video where Schumer threatens Supreme Court Justices, and you expect us to believe your comment rather than the video of Schumer making the threats. You might as well write "What does Schumer have to do with this? He is not in the video". That would be equally ridiculous of you to expect us to believe. Do you understand how utterly stupid you come across, when you ask "what threat" when commenting on a video that contains the threat; a video whose purpose is to put a spotlight on the threat, and you ask "what threat". Really. Take a breath and think about how incredibly stupid your are coming across. I do not normally call people stupid. But your assertion of no threat, in a video containing a threat, is the equivalent of holding a "call me stupid" sign.
    1
  41. @0:52 "...she is part of a growing trend." Wrong. "He" is part of a growing trend. When you report that a man is a she, then you are part of the problem. You are spreading misinformation. If you are a serious news channel, then stick to facts. Hormones do not change your gender. What you were born with between your legs determines your gender. If you can impregnate a woman, then you are a male. If you can be impregnated by a man, then you are a woman. Never use the language of the radical left. Men are men. Women are women.
    1
  42. The logic for the judge's reasoning, to publicly post Tara Reade's social security number, should extend to social media sites posting the judge's social security number, as well as the editor of the New York Times' social security number, and the New York Times' CEO's social security number. @Fox News: When you report on items such as this, you should identify the judge, and show his/her photo, and you should identify all relevant parties from the New York Times, and show their photos. Do not allow those cretins to harass victims, and remain anonymous.
    1
  43. Tucker, it would have been helpful if Eva Vlaardingerbroek would have identified the specific people that are pushing the "insect eating" agenda. Blaming a government is not helpful. Blaming [First Name] [Last Name], [Title] (and show photo), is the way to assign blame to tyrants. Although this report in informative, it inadvertently provides anonymity to the culprits. We still do not know they are. You can be sure that they are not conservatives, because the media is proficient at identifying conservatives in record time. As it currently stands, we do not know who to vote out of office. We do not know who to fire. We do not know against whom a campaign should be made. We need to identify, with specificity, who these people are, and find videos of them eating steak and never eating insects.
    1
  44. Two words: The big guy. Two words: A locked garage. Two words: Biden document scandal. Two words: Hunter Biden's laptop.
    1
  45. @Fox News: Your video's title implies lawful conduct by those criminals that were blocking the road. You did so by labeling them "protesters" and "activists" in the title of this video. Protesting is a Constitutional right. It is in our Bill Of Rights. No where in our Constitution / Bill Of Rights is written the right to conduct yourself criminally. Blocking roads is criminal. Ergo, it is not protesting. It is not activism. Radical leftists attempt to change the English language. With this video's title, Fox News is using the twisted language of the radical left. I do not believe that Fox News is that gullible. My conclusion is that Fox News supports the radical left's distorted, clown world, language agenda.
    1
  46. Two words: Never patronize Airbnb.
    1
  47. @0:24 "...the President* is frustrated with his staff, fearing that their clean-up campaign makes him look weak" I would not word it that way. President* Biden "is" weak. The fact that he has issues with the people that are providing his life support (in a manor of speaking), shows how weak he is. If not for his "clean-up" staff, his true self would be fully exposed for the weakling that he is. History is replete with incompetent rulers that lash out at their loyal servants who break their backs in cleaning up the chaos from their leader. Joe Biden is a "real time", "live" example of one such leader (for lack of a better noun).
    1
  48. @1:48 "...it start's to look political" "look political"? What on earth needs to happen before it is labeled as "flat out political"? Why do conservatives always pull their punches? Why do conservatives always dance around with the language? Why do conservatives always beat around the bush, as if there is only a sign of trouble, when the trouble is actually in action in front of their faces? @Fox News: Call this what it is. It is 100% political.
    1
  49. @0:14 "...signatures has been verified" Why were they verified? Newsom's policy position, as well as his radical leftist's party's position, is no verification for voting. -- Show up and vote -- no questions asked. -- Mail in your vote -- no questions asked. -- Vote early -- no questions asked. -- Vote late -- no questions asked. @0:58 "Who knows (why people say things)" -- Answer: Cuomo's accusers know. Cuomo spewed a list of reasons for why people accused him of sexual assault and sending infected Covid-19 patients into nursing homes. Intentionally omitted from his list was: "When numerous people, mostly from your own party, all accuse you of sexual assault, and when government records show that you forced nursing homes to take Covid-19 patients, it is the truth". That's right. He left out from his list that when numerous, responsible, credible, people make the same accusation, they are telling the truth. Telling the "truth" was left off of his list.
    1
  50. @2:09 "...he should not be the president after 2024." Congresswoman Nancy Mace inadvertently gave a pass to the Biden criminal family. How? Joe Biden should be removed from office, and charged with a litany of crimes, including treason (he sold out our country to our adversaries).
    1