Comments by "Perhaps" (@NoEgg4u) on "The Officer Tatum"
channel.
-
Her name is Brittney Cooper.
@Officer Tatum: Why did you not say her name, or list her name in your video, or in your title, etc?
For some inexplicable reason, conservatives inadvertently provide anonymity to radical leftists.
If she was white, and said those things about blacks, her name would be plastered everywhere, by every leftist channel, on every platform.
But since she is is a radical leftist, conservative hosts give her cover, by way of keeping her name out of their reporting.
Her name does appear for 2½ seconds @1:47 in this video, and I suspect that was just happenstance.
It would also be helpful to provide the names, titles, and photos of the executives at Rutgers that allow her to remain employed at that college.
You can bet that if a conservative at that school said the same things about blacks, every last person that has authority over them would be named and questioned.
It is good that this channel exposes these degenerates. But please always identify them, and try to also identify those in authority that have the power to suspend or fire them.
137
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
He did not break the state record, because it is a women's only race, and he is a man.
Every official that allowed that man to run, in that women's only race, should be fired.
Every official that awarded him the win, in that women's only race, should be fired.
Every official that met the above criteria should never be allowed to judge a competition, again.
Every official that met the above criteria should never be allowed to be left alone, unsupervised, with children.
Normal people should hold their own ceremony, awarding the win to the woman that actually won that race.
Normal people should hand out trophies, etc, and perform the duties as the officials of the race, and ignore the radical leftists, just as you would ignore the person howling at the moon.
1
-
Look at how she dresses for her public, on-line complaining, as well as her ranting. Can you picture her at an interview? Do you think that she keeps her "check out my body" and her angry disposition in check during an interview?
@4:44 "...going against..."
That is telling.
I never thought of myself as going against any company to where I applied for a position. Rather, I saw myself as being a productive, team member of those corporations.
And did you see how she did her "punching" when she said that she is going "against" corporate America? She has disdain for the companies she is expecting to hire her. An $80,000 education / indoctrination, and no brains.
But she thinks of herself as being above corporations. She is against them, while complaining that they will not hire her.
It is likely due to the entitlement attitude taught to her by her $80,000 indoctrination service (known as radical leftist professors).
Now that she made this video, does she think that when she shows up for an interview, that her childish display will help her? How many executives would hire her, after that hiring executive watched her in that video?
She is frustrated that she was taught that the world revolves around her, and is now finding out that she is nothing special.
And her $80,000 indoctrination service did not teach her to compose herself when posting videos for the world to see.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
When a fire alarm is pulled, people evacuate. People can get injured.
People in the bathrooms had a tough decision to make.
People in meetings had to cut their meetings, and it is not a simple matter to just get everyone back into meetings (many of those folks have hectic schedules).
Half of the legislative branch of our government came to a grinding halt, when those law makers dropped what they were doing and left the building.
The fire department wasted time, trying to determine if there was a fire.
If a real fire emergency broke out elsewhere, then only half of the life saving personnel would be able to respond with only half of their vehicles.
Our tax dollars for paying countless personnel went down the drain, because instead of them working, they evacuated.
If anyone believes that what Jamaal Bowman did is not a problem, then see what happens to you if you falsely pull a fire alarm. Do not do that. But you would be arrested, criminally charged, and likely charged for all of the costs for all personnel that responded to that false fire alarm.
Jamaal Bowman is a radical leftist degenerate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
The reason that she keeps talking, and interrupts incessantly, is because she thinks that she wins debates when others walk away from her.
Some people are rude, in order to drive people away, to keep those people from exposing how uneducated they are (or in this case, "she is").
She talks fast, thinking that that makes her look smart -- when it only makes her look disrespectful and shows her lack of a civil upbringing.
Her fast, loud-mouth works on dolts. It does not work on people that have a light on, such as Larry Elder.
As to her "They did not create the system."
Well, is she expecting our system, based on our Constitution, to be discarded and replaced by some anonymous black people that she approves?
If she is unhappy with The United States Of America, she has a long list of 54 African countries, all having "systems" created by black people.
Which one does she want us to emulate?
Why is she not living there?
1
-
Constitutional rights are not up for grabs.
Constitutional rights may not be suspended -- ever.
One of the points of We The People having our constitutional rights, is so when tyrants falsely claim an emergency, to deny us our constitutional rights, we retain our constitutional rights.
Preciously because of what that tyrant is doing, is why our constitutional rights remain in place.
If claiming an emergency suspends our constitution, then what is the point of having a constitution that can be turned off at the whim of a tyrant claiming an emergency?
Even during an actual emergency, that is when our constitutional rights matter all the more.
@5:35 "...about whether or not, in an emergency, we can create a safer environment."
1) There is no emergency.
-- Maui is an emergency.
-- 9/11/2001 was an emergency.
-- Pearl Harbor was an emergency.
2) Denying citizens their constitutional rights, to defend themselves against a tyrannical dictator, does not create a safer environment
Michelle Lujan Grisham just showed her hand. She is saying that disarming We The People makes for a safer environment. Ergo, she is intending to make her unconstitutional gun ban permanent.
If banning guns is safer this month, then it is safer next month, too. And the month after that, and the year after that.
Michelle Lujan Grisham knows the above, which makes it all the worse.
She is testing We The People to see if we will give in to her unconstitutional power grab.
If We The People allow it, she will see that as a sign of weakness, and she will seek to grab more power, and she will seek to trash our constitution more and more.
Folks, Michelle Lujan Grisham is a degenerate, radical leftist that hates America.
Anyone that pisses on our constitution hates it. Ergo, they hate America. They are power hungry tyrants.
Michelle Lujan Grisham is pissing on her oath of office. She should be impeached and removed from office.
1
-
1
-
Even rich people have a limit, to how much taxes they will pay, even if they are easily able to afford it.
No one likes to over-pay, or be ripped off, even if they are wealthy.
At some point, the rich folks will move to other states where they can get the same living conditions, without the high taxes.
At some point, those $20,000,000 homes will go down in value, because those that can afford them will not make the purchase, due to the high taxes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1