Comments by "Perhaps" (@NoEgg4u) on "TheDC Shorts"
channel.
-
2000
-
1000
-
610
-
276
-
92
-
87
-
77
-
@1:33
"You take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at ya"
Schumer is saying that we should all cower to the intelligence community.
Schumer is saying that even their boss, the President of the United States of America, should behave subservient to unelected bureaucrats.
Schumer is saying that they are accountable to no one, because they are all-powerful, without boundaries. There are no checks and balances on them. They are supreme and answer to no one.
Folks, Schumer is saying this because of 1 of 2 reasons (possibly a bit of both):
1) He is a coward, and unlike Trump, Schumer lacks a spine.
2) He is indirectly threatening Trump
More on #2:
Schumer knows that the chiefs at the intelligence agencies broke numerous laws and abused their power and ignored their oath to uphold our constitution.
Schumer knows that Trump knows this, and Schumer knows that Trump is going to bring them to justice.
Schumer knows that when those corrupt officials start getting prosecuted, and they start talking, that more and more Democrat corruption will be revealed.
Schumer knows that his party will be exposed like never before. He knows that even the corrupt media will not be able to hide Schumer's party's unbridled and unprecedented level of crime.
So Schumer is trying to make Trump think twice about going after the corrupt heads of those agencies. Schumer is trying to instill fear in Trump.
But Trump has no fear. It is Schumer that is sweating.
54
-
41
-
40
-
38
-
37
-
32
-
28
-
27
-
25
-
The people that broke the McCloskey's gate are not protesters.
The people that trespassed on the McCloskey's property are not protesters.
They are a mob.
They are rioters.
They are criminals.
Protesting is legal, and is protected by our constitution / Bill Of Rights.
Vandalizing, looting, and rioting are not rights.
Vandalizing, looting, and rioting are not legal.
If 1 person broke the McCloskey's gate, that would be illegal, and that person would get arrested.
If 2 people broke the McCloskey's gate, that would be illegal, and those people would get arrested.
If 100 people broke the McCloskey's gate, it remains illegal, and those people should get arrested.
Criminal acts do not become legal when X number of them form a mob.
Every time someone calls the above "protesting", they are giving the criminals a hint of justification.
Every time a video gets posted where they call these criminals "protesters", either in the title of the video, or in the content of the video, or in the text of a comment, etc, please correct the narrative.
We must be vigilant in correcting every misuse of of the verb "protesting".
Cheers!
23
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
@0:19
"54 percent"
The questioner said 56 percent, and you can hear Biden having a mental moment, because he cannot remember the number.
So he struggles to talk, and realizes that he has to guess at what he cannot remember from a simple question from 10 seconds earlier, resulting in a stuttering pronunciation of 54 percent.
This is a typical Biden gaffe, when his memory cannot keep up with reality.
@0:25
"Well their memory is not very good, quite frankly"
His mind is on his own memory lapse, so he blurts out the above about other people's memory, and adds "quite frankly".
Often, when people overcompensate, and over emphasize their point, it is because they are struggling with the varsity of their own statement. In this case, Biden used "quite frankly" to try and come across as being certain, when he is actually uncertain of the question he was asked.
And watch his eyes, @0:25. He closes them and struggles to concentrate. For a second, he knows he is in "gaffe mode", and he focuses all of his thoughts on trying to appear to be lucid.
15
-
15
-
14
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
All of their buzz words, and convoluted reasoning, for hiring pilots based on anything other than merit, will be come to bite them after one of their planes goes down, and hundreds of people are killed -- both in the cabin, and people on the ground where the plane crashes.
The law suits will be numerous, and the payouts will be huge.
It is sad that it will take the loss of many lives for this to make Scott Kirby culpable for his reckless actions.
I just hope that not only United Airlines gets sued, and loses, but also that Scott Kirby gets sued, personally, and loses -- enough to bankrupt him. Anything less, and he will not care one bit.
And when United Airlines; stock crashes, I hope that the stockholders sue United Airlines, and hope that the stockholders sue Scott Kirby, personally. It is the only language that mentally disturbed tyrants, like Scott Kirby, will understand.
11
-
@0:23
"...what we believe to be true"
Translation:
First understand that her use of "believe" is not defined in the dictionary.
When she says that she "believes" something, that does not mean that she believes it, because I "believe" that she is a liar.
And for the rest of the BS being spewed in the rest of the video:
It all adds up to people with Trump Derangement Syndrome, that have still not accepted that they lost in 2016, and are telling everyone that they are not accepting another win by President Trump.
This does have a silver lining:
They would not all be drumming the same "We do not believe that President Trump won, again" beat, if they thought that Biden could win.
They already know that President Trump is going to win. So they have already begun their resistance operation.
This time, however, President Trump is going to handle them more affirmatively. He will use every legal means at his disposal to drain the swamp (and, yes, the media personalities in this video are card-carrying members of the swamp -- they run the swamp).
Cheers!
11
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
To all of the talking heads that assert that there is no evidence of fraud:
1) The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rriD74r4l1s
2) It is utter nonsense to think that in such volatile, partisan, political times, that mail-in voting would not be compromised. That in a nation of 330,000,000 people, no one is going to find the cracks in the system, and no one is going to pay anyone off, and no one is going to lose ballots, etc.
Fraud exists in every walk of life.
Wherever there is money or power at stake, then there is 100% guaranteed under-the-table actions that will take place.
The difference between in-person voting and mail-in voting is that the former, albeit not perfect, is impossible to exploit at scale. Whereas the latter (mail-in) can be exploited on a large scale basis. And with such an attractive target, with such an attractive pay-off, there will be people that will exploit mail-in voting.
7
-
@1:26 "Let 'em speak."
Did you catch that disgusting action by that school board member?
Here is what she did:
She finds the speaker's words to be distasteful, but she has to let him speak. But when the audience cheers him on, she is boiling inside. She can't stand him being applauded. So she interrupts him, and tries to stop the applause.
And what is so deceitful is her choice of words.
It is like someone interrupting you by saying "I'm not interrupting you", when you try to speak.
She says "Let 'em speak", to stop the applause that infuriates her, and she tries to take the wind out of his sails; tries to make him lose his tempo.
She tried early on, @0:23, with "Address the board" interruption.
He was addressing the board. She knew where he was going (we all knew where he was going). None of us would have interrupted him with "Address the board". She knew he was laying down the foundation for his admonishment of the school board members. So she tries to interrupt him, implying that he was not addressing the school board members.
Of course he was addressing the school board members. Everything he said pertained to his country, his family, and how those school board members are trying to usurp his role as a father and the role of our constitutional republic. Everything he said was for the ears of the school board members (and she interrupts him with "Address the board").
Radical leftists do this all the time. They see you on a roll, and so they interrupt you, seemingly innocently. But there is nothing innocent about it. They do so to break your stride.
That school board member (that repeatedly tried to interrupt that father) is a radical leftist degenerate.
That father knew the score. He ignored her. He kept his pace. He drove home his points. That he ignored her, likely angered her all the more.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@0:37 "You don't have to take, ah, ah, our, our, our word, ah, on this"
The press should have questioned Brian Deese's nervous statement.
The press should have asked:
Why should the public not take your word?
Brian Deese then goes on to read different company's quotes.
Note that a company does not speak. Rather, people that own the company, or are employed by the company, speak.
But Brian Deese named none of the "people" that he is quoting.
Is it not great to have an official White House briefing, where the public servant reads anonymous quotes?
I will lay odds that all of them are Democrats, and that most of them receive government favors.
I will also lay odds that some of those quotes are not current.
I will also lay odds that some of those quotes were taken out of context.
And, of course, Brian Deese read zero quotes from a multitude of sources (including decades of long established government statistical reporting) that conclude that we are in a recession.
What's next, quotes from Nancy Pelosi and Maxine Waters?
5
-
@2:44 "This is gold."
The guy recording finds this amusing.
I wonder how amused he would be if he owned that business, and he had to pay for all of the damage and lost business?
As to all of the scenes:
All of the stealing, and all of the vandalism, is paid for by all of the actual customers.
Eventually, those businesses find it too dangerous and too costly to do business in such crime-ridden areas. Then the degenerates that caused those businesses to leave will cry racism and discrimination.
Employees lose their jobs when those businesses close.
Normal, civil people that cannot afford to relocate get hurt the most, when they now are forced to travel further to find food -- and in their financial situation, they cannot afford that extra travelling expense. And if they are elderly, or handicapped, the burden is enormous.
99.99% of these videos are from businesses in Democrat run cities. And most of the people that will complain, when those businesses leave, will re-elect those same Democrats.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Healthcare workers cannot maintain social distancing. The are in direct contact with patients. Not only people having heart attacks, and car accidents, etc, but they are in direct contact with countless virus-infected people. They are the most susceptible to contracting the virus. And if we lose our healthcare workers, it is all over.
Cheaper masks will not have the disease filtering properties of an N95 mask. But:
-- If you have an itch while wearing a mask, or accidentally lean your hand on your face, then scratching yourself by pressing on the mask can keep your hands from infecting you.
-- If you have the virus, and you cough while wearing a mask, your spray will be contained and have less of a chance of infecting others.
-- If someone coughs on you, and you are wearing a mask, then you stand a chance of their spray hitting your mask, and not hitting your face.
The less that you expose your face to the virus, the less that your hands touch your face, the better your chances are of remaining virus free. So masks, any masks, are beneficial.
5
-
@2:05 -- He forgot both of the questions.
He rambles on about Putin, because "Putin" is the only word he remembers from the questions. But his ramblings are generalizations, because he is trying to give an answer without revealing that he forgot the questions.
@2:31 -- He remembered that the question pertained to an interview, but he still does not remember what the current questions are. Because:
@2:39 -- I, I, I, don', don', don', I, I don't think it matters a whole lot, in terms of this next meeting.
Translation: Since "I don't think it matters...", then he does not have to answer the questions. But he can't answer the questions, because he does not remember the questions. So he found a way to say "It does not matter". That was his answer, which is not an answer, because he forgot the questions.
If we had honest reporters, then what they should do, when they see he does not remember the questions, is to ask him to repeat the questions.
They should be blunt and ask him if he remembers the questions.
America and the world should know if the President* of the United States Of America is mentally fit for that office.
It might seem cruel to put Biden on the spot, but it must be done for the sake of our nation and the impact on the rest of the world.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
That suspect was both stupid and racist. Why?
When you have an illegal gun in your car, and you drive like you own the road, then that is a wildly stupid thing to do.
When you accuse others of being racist, because they are enforcing laws that you are flaunting, it is because you are a racist.
He lied, and he put on the "I am a victim" BS act.
That is a man to be avoided. Can you imagine how he would conduct himself in a confrontation with people (other than the police)?
That is a man with lots of jail time in his future. I will lay odds that he has been in jail before, or that he has an outstanding arrest warrant.
Stupid, lying, racist, argumentative, is no way to advance yourself.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@2:48
"... legal asylees are not charged with any crime"
She is correct.
She is also a crafty misdirector of the point of the dialog.
When people show up at your door, how do you know who is a "legal asylee"?
Yes, the ones that are really seeking asylum (not just making it up), and satisfy our country's laws (as passed by congress) insomuch as they are deemed to truly be "legal asyleees", then they are not breaking our law.
Very few quality.
Each and every border crosser that enters, but not at a port of entry, is by law not a "legal asylee".
Even the border crossers that enter at a port of entry are not "legal asylees", with few exceptions.
To put it another way, AOC is saying that people that do legal things are not breaking the law (implying that every border crosser is doing a legal thing)
Any person in our country that has not broken a law is not a law breaker.
So for AOC to say that "legal asylees" (also known as those that are complying with our law) are not law breakers is, "duh", true.
Let's build on AOC's logic:
I drive. I do not break the law when I drive. Ergo, I am a legal driver.
That does not mean that every person that drives does not break motor vehicle law.
I use my telephone. I do not use it to break any laws. Ergo, I am a legal telephone user.
That does not mean that all telephone users do not use their telephone for an illegal act.
AOC attempted to define every single border crosser as a legal border crosser (calling them all "legal asylees"). Yet they are not all legal border crossers.
She makes a true statement, but in a way that misdirects the truth.
She is despicable.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@okpk3897 "...tweeted directly to Donald Trump to give the apology"?
The tweet did not apologize. Rather, the tweet made excuses, and in the same breath, included a "but I was right about this other thing".
And although it seems like yahoo addressed their BS better than other fake news media (like MSNBC and CNN), they should not be deemed to be on the road to recovery. That yahoo might now be less caustic than other fake news is not helpful. Like a mugger allowing you to keep bus fare. Should we thank the mugger?
If you believe that yahoo might start being less critical of President Trump, then you must be very young. This will change nothing. And if there is a change, it will be that yahoo makes sure that they do not get easily tripped up, the next time they throw BS at President Trump.
Think about it. Do you honestly believe that yahoo is going to turn over a new leaf? Do you really think that their hatred of President Trump is any different?
Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, and Maxine Waters will campaign for President Trump's re-election, before yahoo becomes less critical of President Trump.
yahoo is a cancer on our freedom. They should not be given any benefit of the doubt. They have actively and falsely attacked President Trump for years, and will continue doing so. Do not assume that they are kind people. They are not. Do not give them an inch.
3
-
3
-
3
-
@0:21 "I could have said 'No'"
Typical BS speak. Why?
Lemon could have said "I like turtles", or "Follow the yellow-brick road", etc.
You see, Lemon is playing word games. Yes, he could have said "No". What Lemon is not saying is the if he did say "No", then he would be on the unemployment line.
You can always say "No".
Lemon is making it seem as though if he said "No", that he would have retained his original job. That is a lie by omission, and a lie by inference.
Lemon was given the choice of a new, lower stature spot, and it was take it or leave it. So he took it. "No" was not an option, if he wanted to remain employed.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@0:02 Reporter's question:
"What makes you think Vladimir Putin will alter course, based on the action you're taken today?"
@0:06 President* Biden's response:
"Let's get something straight. You remember, if you covered me from the very beginning, I did not that, in fact, the sanctions would deter him (Putin). Sanctions never deter."
Now let's go back and listen to the reporter's question...
And assuming you believe President* Biden, that "sanctions never deter", then what is President* Biden doing that will "deter" Putin?
@1:06 "...is to be sure, that after a month, we will sustain what we're doing, not just next month, the following month, but for the remainder of the entire year. That's what will stop him (Putin)"
-- Raise your hand if you know what "we will sustain what we're doing" is?
-- Raise your hand if you know what "That's what will stop him (Putin)" is?
What will stop him (Putin)?
3
-
3
-
@0:10
"The left maintains then Vice President Biden's unmasking of General Flynn is no big deal"
Well, to them, it is no big deal. To them, all crimes are no big deal, as long as it advances their criminal pursuit of power.
@2:01
"I want the system fixed"
What is there to fix?
Just prosecute the offenders with laws that are on the books. There must be laws already on the books -- right?
Stating that this should be fixed implies that the law was not broken, and that we need laws to prevent this.
1) Existing laws were broken. So just prosecute the offenders.
2) If existing laws are not stopping the Democrats, then what is the point of creating new laws? Why would new laws keep them from breaking those laws, too, with impunity?
The answer is to have consequences for their criminal actions. The answer is to prosecute the offenders. The answer is to let the criminals know that all laws will be enforced, and that your "I am above the law" days are over, and you are going to be locked up for those crimes you committed while believing that you were untouchable. You might have believed that your were above the law, and you can mull that over while behind bars.
3
-
3
-
3
-
Although President Trump does the right thing, regardless of politics... in this case, that pardon will probably wait until after the midterm elections.
Freeing Derek Chauvin could result in losing swing voters, and black voters, and low information voters, resulting in radical leftists taking control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
It will make it impossible for President Trump to have any sane laws passed, or have any insane laws removed. The entire funding of our national budget would be thrown into chaos.
Chauvin's freedom, unfortunately, needs to wait until after the midterm elections. The stability of our nation, and by extension the world, must come first.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
1) Both of them should be arrested.
The driver, for being intoxicated.
The passenger, for obstructing the officers during a traffic stop. After she got out of the car the second time, the officer should have warned her that if she gets out, again, she will be arrested. After being arrested, and putting her in hand-cuffs, in the police vehicle, the level of drama would have gone down. She could sit in the police car and scream all she want. At least the officers could focus on the driver, without having to worry about the passenger.
The officers cannot let down their guard when someone at the scene is out of control. And, yes, that passenger was out of control. When the police tell you to stay in the vehicle, and you repeatedly refuse to stay in the vehicle, then you are out of control.
She did not throw punches. But when someone refuses to follow police orders, the police have to assume that the person is dangerous, even if they are in a bikini.
2) Both of them (especially the passenger) are in for a life of sorrow. If they do not use their looks, now, to make themselves millionaires (and hire someone to handle their finances), then they will be on public assistance by the time they are 30 years old.
No man is going to put up with their crap, once their looks are gone. And as far as looks go, they are average (maybe a bit higher than average). They are in decent shape, due to their age and natural metabolism. 100% certain that they will be obese by the time they are 35. Combine that with having no respect for themselves or others, and they are done. Right now, boyfriends put up with them for pump and dump. As their looks wane, they will wake up to the reality that everyone that pretended to like them, did so due to their physical attributes.
3) in approximately 10 years (or less), when their youth can no longer save them, they will blame the world for their despair. Nothing will be their fault. Nothing will be their life choices.
If others are to blame, it is big tech and media outlets for encouraging them to act as they do. But ultimately, it is their own fault. The fun and games have a few years remaining, and they do not know it.
If they ever come to realize that they never grew up and never chose to act responsibly, it will be too late.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
I wonder how many Britain people would like to comment on the tyrannical government that they are now under, but remain silent, due to the chance of the tyrants sending the police to arrest them for their comments.
Yes, it has gotten that bad. People in Britain that have posted comments on facebook, that the radical left found offensive, have been arrested.
Those poor folks are living in a dictatorship, and it will only get worse.
When President Trump returns to the Oval Office, I believe that he will call out those tyrants, and put a global spotlight on them.
Folks, President Trump is the only thing stopping this (what you saw in this video) from coming to America.
It is already here, in a lesser form. What you are seeing in Britain is the next step that we will see here in America, unless President Trump wins and puts a stop to it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
She lied about calling 911.
She lied about no one being in there.
She lied about the police being the reason for her going to get fired.
She lied about her not doing anything wrong.
She lied about the police having no reason to taser him.
What normal person calls 911, and lies and lies, to mess with her boyfriend?
What normal person, that supposedly has to go to work, calls 911 to mess with their boyfriend, and does not see how that will keep her from getting to work?
She is probably a drama queen at work, causing all kinds of trouble. She knows that she is on thin ice with her management, for being such a psycho at work, and they would love nothing better than to have cause to fire her. Well, she just handed them cause to fire her, and she knows it.
A person in good standing at their job would not lose their job for being late. But for not showing up, due to a prank 911 call, is enough to get just about anyone fired. But she is blaming the police for her imminent firing. If she set her building on fire, she would blame the police for her getting fired.
She is not only a mental mess, in need of years of professional psychiatric help, but she is also a blithering idiot. How stupid do you have to be to do what she did?
Raise your hand if you think she votes Republican (clearly she votes for leftists, assuming she ever votes).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@joelhodoborgas I keep a copy of my comments, check later to see if they survived. If they are gone, I copy / paste the comment, again.
Sometimes it takes a day or two, and several attempts. Usually my comments eventually survive. But it should not be that way.
youtube and parent, google, are not free speech platforms, and violate section 230 of the Communications and Decency Act.
Hopefully, President Trump will remove section 230 protections from them, for being editors, which is prohibited by the Act (other than for illegal content).
1
-
Some of the Democrats are just plain stupid, and some of them are just plain evil.
As to the stupid ones:
They have the gift of gab. So their mouths moves and words come out, and they assertively "tell it like it is", even though they are clueless.
Then there are smart Democrats that lie, as easily as we breathe. They know that Putin has nearly nothing to do with the price of gas. And whatever role Putin does play in the price of gas, it is because Democrats gave him that role. How?
We have more oil in Alaska than the Middle East and Russia, combined.
We need not be dependent on anyone, whatsoever, for energy. In fact, we can unilaterally supply fuel to the world.
So other countries that set prices are doing so, because Democrats allow them to do so, because Democrats created our dependence on them.
If we produced fuel without government (Democrat) restraints, a gallon of gas would be below $1 per gallon.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@0:25 "As I see it, you don't live up to these standards..."
Folks, when a radical leftist is using clown-world language, trying to make you look bad, pay attention to the words that the radical leftist used.
In this example, he said "As I see it, you don't live up to these standards...", implying that he has the higher ground; implying that his standards are higher than yours.
M. Mikklesen should have replied with:
"Sir, I do not lower my standards, to cow-tow to radical leftist's attempts to control other people's lives."
"Unlike you, I have a spine, and I have self-respect, and I do not try to demean others by asking an insulting question, implying that I am better than them."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
President* Biden is the head of his crime family.
It stands to reason that the Taliban is paying Biden loads of cash, for leaving behind $billions in military equipment.
Think about it:
Although President* Biden is mentally challenged, he does have enough brains left to know to not give away $billions in weaponry. And even if he never thought about it, the Secretary of Defense, and the military brass, etc, all would know not to leave behind $billions in military equipment.
The answer has to be that it was done intentionally, by President* Biden, and his crime family will be rewarded by the Taliban.
If this turns out to be true, then he should be tried for treason, as well as every officer that complied with orders to give away $billions of military gear to terrorists that are hellbent on killing Americans.
1
-
The school board members, to whom the students are reporting outrageous issues, are all sitting there and loving every second of the complaints. Why?
It is those school board members that hate America, hate white people (hate themselves if they themselves are white), hate capitalism, hate free speech, etc.
So when these students report on the status of what is going on in the schools, the school board members are gleeful inside, knowing that their efforts to tear down America's foundation, via brainwashing young minds, is in full motion in the school.
This is somewhat analogous to innocent, political prisoners reporting on what is going on in the prisons to the people that put them into the prisons.
Everything that the students are reporting are due to the policies put in place by the people that the students are complaining to (the school board members).
Please do not assume that now, since the students are reporting what is happening, that the school board members will take action. The school board members put this into action, and this is merely confirmation that their plan is already in action.
These videos need to include the names of the board members, the title of the board members, the photos of the board members, and the locations of the school districts that the board members represent.
Without the above information, all we have are students complaining to faceless, nameless, anonymous people.
The People do not know who to vote out of office, when The People do not know who those people are.
For some reason, conservatives give cover to the very people that need the light of day shined on them. We need to have these public, taxpayer funded, political board members exposed, asked questioned, on camera, by conservative media.
We already know what is going on in the schools.
We need to know the specific people that are making it happen. Without knowing who they are, not much well get done. They need to be voted out. But that will not happen if we do not know who they are.
Thank you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
RINO mumbo-jumbo, from Mike Pence.
He wants to bring in new, executive level justice department personnel, that both the right and the left respect.
Pence is either out of his mind, or sucking up to the Democrats. Why?
The Democrat party is controlled by radical leftists. None of those radical leftists will be satisfied with anyone other than radical leftists running the justice department.
Pence is trying to have us believe that he would get radical Democrats approval for anyone other than radical leftists.
Pence is trying to befriend the radical leftists, that would jail him if they could (but Pence is too much of a political animal to see that). He actually thinks that radical Democrats like him.
President Trump will be the next President. But in the next to impossible odds that a different Republican becomes President, they should pardon President Trump, because it is crystal clear that 100% of the charges against him are political and contrived.
What we did not hear Pence say is that he would prosecute the Democrats for their abuse of power; for their weaponization of our justice system; for wasting hundreds of millions of dollars on phony investigations; for selling their offices to adversarial governments for person gain, etc.
Pence will let President Trump twist in the wind, and do nothing about the massive abuse of power by Democrats.
The Democrats will see Pence as a pushover, and will have no respect for him.
Pence is business as usual.
Mike Pence is a disgrace.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Her (his, their, or its) claims are cringe worthy.
She (he, they, or it) gives "outlandish" a new meaning.
How evil and/or sick of a mind must someone have to stand up in front of an audience, on camera, and state these claims with a straight face?
How sad is it that people (animals, androids, things) earn a living, on our tax dollars, by fabricating wild, wild stories, and she (he, they, or it) has devoted followers that believe this nonsense?
How sick and evil is our news media personnel, that they prop her (him, their, or it) up, and go to great lengths to give her (him, them, it) an air of legitimacy?
I am waiting to one day hear Donald Trump announce that AOC is a devoted Republican, and that she put her life and reputation on the line to bring out the buffoonery and mental illness of the Democrats; that she is the ultimate troll of the Democrat party.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Please stop using the clown world language of the radical left.
He did not get "Misgendered", as indicated in the title of this video.
He got correctly gendered.
His mental illness, of normal people not going along with his irrational view of reality, is what caused his meltdown.
It would be as if he insisted that he was from Neptune, and the title of this video asserted that he had a meltdown for being mis-aliened when normal people called him human.
More radical left clown world language:
Sanctuary cities are not sanctuary cities. They are "Fugitive" cities, as those cities are complicit in hiding fugitives from the law.
Criminals that block roads, burn down buildings, break windows, etc, are not protesters.
Blocking roads is illegal. Our Constitution / Bill Of Rights has no words denoting a right to break the law. As soon as you illegally block a public road, you are a criminal (not a protester).
Stop giving credence to the clown world language of the radical left, by inadvertently calling criminal activity "protesting", and calling fugitive cities "sanctuary" cities, and calling proper gendering as "mis-gendering".
Words have meanings. The radical left knows that, and is why the use noble words to describe their outrageous actions. So never go along with their attempt to redefine words. Every time that they use clown world language, correct them. Every-single-time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Those robots should be illegal (perhaps they are?). Here's why:
1) Motor vehicles are not allowed to be driven on sidewalks.
If you were to create a replica of that robot (but your replica is not a robot). And you controlled your replica by sitting on it and driving it on the sidewalk, the police would stop you, and might ticket you. But somehow when it can be driven on a sidewalk without a driver, then it is allowed?
It is absurd. And as we have seen, it knocks things over.
2) Sidewalks (and the streets) are paid for by the tax dollars of We The People.
Companies pay, separately for their office space and for their storage space and for their assembly space, etc. If you own a company, you pay for the property on which you are using space.
Now we have companies using public sidewalks and public roads (think about driverless cars).
So companies with huge resources can build an army of robots to go all over town (every town), and cause congestion, and they pay zero for using all of the public space?
What happens when, for example, Home Depot creates robot trucks that go around selling supplies everywhere? And McDonalds goes around with automated trucks selling meals, etc.
How many thousands of automated motor vehicles should We The People allow to roam our public sidewalks and our public streets, for free?
Up until now, every vehicle had a driver. So that keeps big companies from abusing the public space (because for each motor vehicle, there was a human in the vehicle that was controlling the vehicle). But when huge companies can just build endless robots to clog our public sidewalks and public streets, and they pay zero taxes for using all of that public space, it is illegal.
Folks, we are seeing the earliest stages of what will turn into a wave of congestion. If this is not stopped, then in years to come, big companies will have armies of these robots all over the place. And it will quickly get worse, as the robots are built in mass, lowering their cost.
Would you be allowed to buy or build a robot, and have it make deliveries for you, or advertise for you?
3) Get ready for free advertising from the robots. No longer will big companies need to pay for billboards, or street signs, etc. They will build truck size robots that roam the streets, nagging the public to buy their products and services.
You might be sitting in a park, relaxing, when along comes a robot to pester you. And a year later, 5 robots will roll in to pester you. It will come to that, if we turn a blind eye to this pestilence.
It might seem interesting or exciting to see these robots today. But like a friend that is fun to be with, if you have to live with them, they get on your nerves. When these robots show up anywhere and everywhere, in mass, the interesting and exciting aspect will be replaced with anger and frustration.
And since these robots will be owned by big companies, and those big companies pay-off law makers, get ready for big penalties for interfering with the operation of the robots.
This is going to turn into a huge mess. And like any disease, catching it early, and eradicating it before it grows roots, is very important.
1
-
1
-
@1:59 -- Notice the rude, selfish, radical leftist standing in the right portion of that video.
How would you like the view from sitting behind him?
That rude, selfish man is a degenerate. He knows that he is blocking everyone behind him from seeing the activities. He does not care. It is all about him.
If I were behind him, I would tell him to sit down. If he refused, I would ask the board members to tell him, and everyone else (other than the one speaking and those along the wall's perimeter) to sit down.
If that fell on deaf ears, I would stand in front of that rude, selfish, radical leftist.
If you go to one of these meetings, and the board members allow such individuals to disrupt the meeting (yes, intentionally blocking others is a disruption), then have signs (or even blank ones) handy, to hold in front of their faces.
Do not tolerate their crap.
Remain lawful and civil. But do to them what they do to others.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@0:00 "An undocument immigrant, living in Florida..."
@CBS News starts right off, with a lie.
The government has loads of documentation on her, from legal notices, to taxes, children in public school, credit cards, insurance, etc.
@2:20 "Alfredo's undocumented status..."
Another lie.
The man owns a business, and @NBC4 tells us that our government has no documents on him.
@3:32 "...and my people, are not welcome"
There are over 1,000,000 people in the USA, from Haiti. They are all welcome, because they came here, legally.
@4:18 "More than 60 migrants..."
A lie by omission.
They are 60 illegal migrants.
@5:25 "...caught the migrants in the villages"
A lie by omission.
...caught the illegal migrants in the villages.
Fake news and more fake news. They refuse to report news without lying.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Since anyone can enter any locker room, then what is the point of the locker room?
Just have everyone dress and undress right in the classroom, or right in they gymnasium.
What is the point of them leaving the gymnasium, to go to a locker room, when the exact same people are going from point "A" to point "B"?
Put urinals in the classrooms and in the hallways. No need for doors.
I am not professing that the above should happen. Rather, I am pointing out the absurdity of the radical leftist, child sex predator agenda.
Their agenda is 1) to find ways of engaging children in anything that involves sex, to make it acceptable to have sex with children, and 2) take control away from parents and families, and have the degenerate government officials dictate how your children are raised.
-- I feel sorry for the children, who are suffering, due to degenerate government officials.
-- I feel sorry for normal parents, who have to deal with this deplorable situation, due to degenerate, child sex predator government officials.
For the parents that vote Democrat, you got what you voted for (there are no Republicans doing the above).
And to show the extent of the sickness with many Democrat voters... even the ones that are fighting against the above, they will vote in the same Democrat, degenerate, child sex predators -- again.
If Jeffrey Epstein was the governor of California, Democrats would re-elect him.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Healthcare workers cannot maintain social distancing. The are in direct contact with patients. Not only people having heart attacks, and car accidents, etc, but they are in direct contact with countless virus-infected people. They are the most susceptible to contracting the virus. And if we lose our healthcare workers, it is all over.
Cheaper masks will not have the disease filtering properties of an N95 mask. But:
-- If you have an itch while wearing a mask, or accidentally lean your hand on your face, then scratching yourself by pressing on the mask can keep your hands from infecting you.
-- If you have the virus, and you cough while wearing a mask, your spray will be contained and have less of a chance of infecting others.
-- If someone coughs on you, and you are wearing a mask, then you stand a chance of their spray hitting your mask, and not hitting your face.
The less that you expose your face to the virus, the less that your hands touch your face, the better your chances are of remaining virus free. So masks, any masks, are beneficial.
And the fewer people that get infected means that those people cannot infect others, and so on. If more non-essential people get infected, then they infect more people, and so on. And the hospitals cannot handle countless infected people, while they still have their normal emergencies (heart attacks, car accidents, etc).
1
-
1
-
Someone please point me to Arnold Schwarzenegger's videos on:
-- ANTIFA rioters, not wearing masks.
-- Democrat law makers, not wearing masks.
-- BLM protesters, not wearing masks.
-- President Obama, throwing a "sophisticated" birthday party, not wearing masks.
-- Cuomo, sending thousands of COVID-19 positive patients into nursing homes, resulting in the deaths of thousands of people.
-- President* Biden, allowing COVID-19 positive illegal immigrants into our country, by the thousands.
Etc.
Arnold is right on a lot of issues. But he has a leftist's view on many issues, too. And when his leftist side surfaces, that is when, like all leftists, he is hypocritical.
1
-
1
-
The Democrat party "is" a Socialist / Communist party. They just try to keep it in the closet, because they know that Americans would vote them out of office.
Bernie is the only Democrat that proudly admits that he is a Democrat Socialist. But even Bernie is full of BS, because putting the adjective "Democrat" ahead of the word "Socialist" is nonsense, and Bernie does it to keep more Democrats (that are not Socialists) in his camp.
More to the point is that Bernie is not even really a Socialist. Bernie is a Communist.
But as all good Communists do, in their climb to power, he sells himself as less than the tyrant that he really is.
And like all good Communists, Bernie redistributes from others, but not from one of his 3 homes (most people dream of, one day, owning a single home -- and Bernie, anti-rich-people Bernie, owns 3 homes).
The Democrat party (which includes most of the media) have done everything that they can to disparage any and all conservative candidates, and the Democrat party (which includes most of the media) have brought about the rise of all of the radicals (like Bernie). And now that they have the radical candidate that they brought to the top, they are complaining about him?
This is not unexpected. Socialism and Communism always leads to chaos, and we are witnessing a sampling of their chaos. Heaven help us if anyone like Bernie should ever take the reins. Then we will experience chaos like no one in this generation can imagine.
1
-
1
-
Both in the title of this posting, and throughout this video, the words "protests" and "protesters" were used. Yet, there were no protesters.
There were law breakers.
Protesting is legal, and protected by our constitution / Bill Of Rights.
Rioting, looting, vandalizing, assaulting trespassing, blocking traffic, etc, are all illegal. None of them are rights. None of them are protests.
Please never call criminal activity "protesting". It gives the criminal conduct a hint a legitimacy.
An accurate title for this video would be:
Criminals at BLM mob gathering Harass, Shout and Trespass in DC.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just as CNN is Fake News.
Just as NBC is Fake News.
...so it is with "Fake Critical Race Theory"
It is fake. So call it fake.
Radical Leftists named it Critical Race Theory, so that the title supposedly gives it a hint of legitimacy.
When the rest of us hop on that train, and also call it Critical Race Theory, we are inadvertently giving credence to the name.
When something is fake, call it fake.
If radical leftists name Flat Earth Theory as reality, would you go along with that name?
No. It would be Fake Flat Earth Theory.
When radical leftists name an agenda, do not let them control the language.
The only people that need Fake Critical Race Theory to be "critical", are the radical, hate-America, charlatan, leftists.
Unless you are quoting someone, do not call Critical Race Theory by that name.
Always call it "Fake Critical Race Theory".
Cheers!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ergo, Joy Reid is a proponent of child sex, child rape, and child incest.
According to Joy Reid, unless you read the entire book, then you are not qualified to object to child sex, child rape, and child incest.
I wonder:
If the school decided to have 11-year olds give the teacher oral sex, would Joy Reid say "Well, here is a form for the parents to opt out."?
In Joy Reid's degenerate world, debauchery is permitted, as long as you offer parents an "opt out" form.
-- The authors of those child sex books should be charged with child sex crimes.
-- The distributors, who knowingly distributed child pornography to children, should be charged with child sex crimes.
-- The publishers of those child sex books should be charged with child sex crimes.
-- The Principal should be charged with child sex crimes.
-- The school board members, who approved child pornography for children, should be charged with child sex crimes.
Every adult, who actively got child pornography into the hands of children, should be charged with child sex crimes.
Every adult employee of that school, who knew that child pornography was being distributed (or made available) to children, and did not report it to the police, should be fired.
When President Trump returns to the oval office, he will have a lot on his plate to deal with.
I hope that filing charges against all of the above child sex predators will be on his list, when he nominates an Attorney General.
1
-
1
-
The three, new board members that took decisive action to have that child pornography book removed, should be commended.
The other board members, that either tried to frustrate having that child pornography book removed, or remained silent on having that child pornography book removed, should be fired.
Next steps:
Every adult that played a role in getting that child pornography book into the hands of children, should be arrested and charged with child sex crimes.
That includes the book's author, and the executives at the book's publishing company, as well as anyone in the school's administration that affirmatively allowed it.
The book's author and the executives at the publishing company knew that the intended distribution for that book was for children. That makes them culpable.
All of the above adults should never be allowed to hold a position of authority over others.
All of the above adults should never be allowed to be left alone with children.
Any other adults, in the school system, that knew about that child pornography book being distributed to children, and did not call the police, should be fired.
1
-
1
-
Yet these same sanctimonious media personalities say nothing about the original movie.
They do not condemn youtube for making it publicly available.
They do not condemn google, youtube's parent company.
They had nothing to say to Colin Firth, Taron Egerton, Samuel L. Jackson, Sofia Boutella, Mark Strong, or Michael Caine, for acting in a movie that promotes such violence.
They had nothing to say to Director Matthew Vaughn.
They had nothing to say to Producers David Reid and Adam Bohling.
They had nothing to say to Writer Jane Goldman.
They had nothing to say to Production companies Twentieth Century Fox, TSG Entertainment, Marv Films, and Shangri-La Entertainment.
And for ratings, these hypocritical media personalities play the clip over and over.
Note that if President Trump were to personally address this video, then that would signal the masses to create more of them, because you will get personal attention from the President Of The United States Of America.
Violence is bad. Violence is wrong. But so is the media's selective outrage.
Lastly, President Trump knows better than to take orders from these phony, self-righteous America haters.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@1:15 -- "We also use third party fact checkers"
Rogan should have dug into that answer, because those third party fact checkers were chosen, by Zuckerberg, because they fit his political agenda.
facebook uses the Poynter Institute, to manage companies that are doing the fact checking.
All of those companies are run by radical leftists.
So Zuckerberg, knowing he would catch heat for censoring speech with which he disagrees, hires companies that are no different than his leftist world view. Now, he can do what he just did with Joe Rogan. He points to those "Fact Checkers", who are no different than CNN, NBC, and the ladies of The View.
The radical left is very good at creating labels that have nothing to do with the contents of the containers. They come up with the "Fact Checkers" label, so that it sounds legitimate, when it is just another radical leftist outfit.
Also, section 230, of the Communications Decency Act, prohibits facebook from acting as publishers. And by Zuckerberg changing the ranking of posts, and by Zuckerberg applying labels to posts, and by Zuckerberg banning posts (that is, posts of which holds opposing political views), puts facebook in violation of that Act.
The protections that facebook enjoys, under section 230, should be revoked, due to Zuckerberg's blatant, and voluminous violations.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Cuomo's reasoning, that the FDA is not running for office, whereas Donald Trump is running for office, is intentionally misleading.
Folks, Cuomo is implying that the people that run the FDA have zero interest in who wins the election.
Nearly everyone that read this comment is not running for office. Does that mean that everyone that is reading this has no interest in who wins elections?
The people that run the FDA are leftist Democrats.
The people that run the FDA knew that delaying the distribution of the vaccine, until after the election, would hurt Trump.
When President Trump returns to the White House, in January of 2025, and he brings with him a majority in both houses of congress, he should have the executives at the FDA prosecuted for:
1) interfering with the election.
2) interfering with the proper functioning of their office.
3) the deaths of thousands of people that would have lived, had the FDA released the vaccine before the election, when they could have, when they already had it available.
Back to Cuomo:
Cuomo is lying to the camera, in his assertion that the FDA had no political interest in the vaccine.
Cuomo is a degenerate.
1
-
1
-
@0:06 "Let's get something straight"
Folks, when President* Biden uses that line, it means that the next words out of his mouth are lies.
In the game of "poker", people that are bluffing or lying will often have what is called a "tell". Better players can read when someone is "telling", and knows that that person is bluffing or lying.
"Let's get something straight" is one of President* Biden's "tells". Others are:
"I'm not joking"
"I'm being serious"
"I'm not kidding"
"No joke"
"I mean it"
What do all of President* Biden's "tells" have in common? Answer:
He "oversells" his lies.
He puts too much emphasis on his lies. He thinks that it will drive home that he is sincere. He thinks that what he is saying "right now" is the only thing you should remember. Next time, when he does a 180° turn, he will use one of the above lines so that you are expected to, again, only go by what he is saying right then and there.
Every time he lies, then at that moment, that is the reality he expects you to go home with.
Joe Biden is a habitual liar. He has been lying all of his life.
I am not suggesting that no one lies. But Joe Biden makes a living and has derived power with the art of lying.
But pay attention to all of his "tells", and you will see that each one is attached to a bold face lie.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Critical Race Theory is Fake. So always call it "Fake Critical Race Theory", just as you would call CNN "Fake News".
The radical left named it with the adjective "Critical". Of course they did. They are experts at Fake titles, too.
It is "critical" only to their hate-America agenda. Other than that, it is the rantings of evil people.
If the radical left was teaching "Critical Flat Earth Theory", would you use their name for that, too?
Of course not. You would call it:
"Fake Critical Flat Earth Theory"
So stop calling Critical Race Theory without the leading adjective "Fake".
If you call it by the name fabricated by the radical left, then you are inadvertently giving credence to the fake theory.
When mainstream (normal) people also call it Critical Race Theory, then that title gains relevance (and titles matter).
When everyone calls it "Fake Critical Race Theory", then it will be known to be the Fake Theory that it is.
It is "Fake", so always call it "Fake", as it should have been in the title of this video (and hopefully future postings by TheDC Shorts.
Cheers!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1) Driving 100 MPH, and the officer did not give him a speeding ticket, is outrageous.
Let's say that the driver fights the reckless driving ticket in court. Well... reckless how?
I could just see the officer, in court, trying to explain how the driver was reckless, and not speeding.
The driver can effectively make the case the he was not speeding, because the officer did not cite him for speeding.
@2:00 "I stopped him for speeding". Notice that he left out that he did not give the driver a speeding ticket.
2) That driver, by the officers own words, was not allowed to be driving at that hour.
And the officer let him drive. This, too, is outrageous.
Watch how that officer, and the police department, get sued for the subsequent crash, because that officer enabled that driver to drive when it was illegal for that driver to drive.
@2:32 -- Of course that officer was nervous. He knows where this is going. He knows he is about to have legal nightmare issues for not issuing a speeding ticket, and for letting that driver drive.
How irresponsible do you have to be, to let someone, who was doing over 100 MPH, without a licence to drive at that hour, to just pull out and do the same thing?
That officer was trying to be kind. But it pains me to write that that officer used seriously poor judgement. Is this a "defund the police" issue, where the police department has to accept unqualified applicants?
1
-
@timmattle4730 "You cannot arrest for motor vehicle violation or impound for these mv violations in New Jersey."
You just made that up.
Moving violations are part of Criminal Procedural Laws.
If you commit a moving violation, then you violated a section of criminal law.
Taken to the extreme... if you commit any moving violation (not coming to a full stop at a stop sign, or right turn on red, or do not signal for a lane change, etc, you can be arrested and taken to jail. But the police have the discretion to release you, on the scene, on your own recognizance -- which is normally what happens.
"He didn't haven't him on radar (never said it was radar) it's a visual estimation."
We do not know whether or not the officer used radar. The officer is not required to provide that information at the scene.
Also, the police are not required to use a radar gun for speeding tickets. They can follow a speeding vehicle, and they can use visual observations. They are trained to accurately estimate the speed of vehicles.
"The reckless is the better choice."
It is not an "either / or" choice. When a driver is both speeding and reckless, then they violated both respective sections of Criminal Procedural Law.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is President* Biden's price hike.
Prices were soaring months before anyone heard of Ukraine.
America was 100% energy independent, in the tail end of President Trump's administration.
America was a net exporter of energy.
America need not be dependent on Russia, or any other country.
Alaska has more oil than all of the middle-eastern countries, combined. America can power the world.
Our dependence on foreign oil is self-inflicted, at the hand of President* Biden.
America's farmers feed the world. But if you prohibit our farmers from farming, then prices rise.
Ergo, because President* Biden is prohibiting energy companies from producing energy, energy prices rise.
And let's assume for a moment that this is 100% Putin's fault.
Then what is President* Biden doing about it?
Answer: worse than nothing, because he continues to deny energy permits to energy companies.
All of President* Biden's heart-felt comments of empathy are feigned. He cares zero about anyone's struggles.
He just read a teleprompter's words, written by an anonymous person, filled with lies, and we are expected to believe that he has empathy?
President* Biden's actions, not his words, tell us he cares zero about the hardships of Americans.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The mentally disturbed man, at the start of this video, is correct that he has a right to be protected by identifying as whatever he wants. And that is where it ends.
He has no right to impose his self-identifying sickness on anyone else.
He is a man (a beta man). But he is a man. Other than, perhaps, people that live with him, no one should be calling him anything other than "sir".
No one should be made to be a fool, by going along with his insanity. But he does have the right to self identify as whatever he wants, just as he has the right to dress up any way he wants. That does not mean anyone must compliment him, or copy him, or gravel to his psychotic demands.
Anyone think that he will be campaigning for President Trump?
----------
For the next, based, speaker...
I would like to have seen who, on that counsel, was interrupting him and admonishing him. Because whoever that was, needs to be fired (voted out), and never be allowed to be around children, unsupervised, and never be hired for any job with authority over anyone else.
1
-
1