Comments by "Perhaps" (@NoEgg4u) on "Forbes Breaking News"
channel.
-
What Senator Cruz did not ask, and what National Transportation Safety Board Chair did not provide, is the names of the specific people that she reached out to that has refused to cooperate.
We need to stop with blaming Boeing, and start blaming [First Name] [Last Name], [Title], at Boeing.
The same goes for the contracting companies.
And if photos of those people are available, she should hold them up and say: "This is [First Name] [Last Name], [Title] and he (or she) is in defiance of federal law."
Then, subpoena those people, and officially ask the justice department to arrest them for defying federal law by impeding the investigation.
Stop playing their game. They love to see congressional representatives and National Transportation Safety Board members publicly sharing their frustration at getting nowhere.
When they see this video, they are giving each other high-fives.
Get them into handcuffs, for their criminal liability, and the high-fives will stop, and everyone else, in any other similar investigation, will suddenly be very forthcoming.
17
-
10
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@1:28 "...so that they can just slip in line..."
That is called "Line Cutting".
No one is allowed to reserve public parking spots (which is akin to reserving a spot in a public line for your car).
When your car gets there, then that is when you have your spot in the line.
Do the affluent get to have others save public spots for themselves?
Imagine you are in a full parking lot, waiting for 15 minutes for someone to pull out, and then someone just drives in and takes the spot of a friend that was sitting there, parked.
They do not get to exchange spots. When someone pulls out, then the person who was there first, waiting the longest, gets that spot.
The person pulling out (the person leaving) does not get to choose who is next.
I have seen family members stand in parking spots in Manhattan, "reserving" the spot for their spouse or parent. So you drive up to that available spot (the only available spot), and someone is standing in it, waiting for a vehicle that is not there. So those with someone that can stand in the spot gets to reserve spots? It is absurd. it is selfish. It is illegal.
It is not a matter of who gets there first. Rather, it is a matter of who gets their car there first.
If I were on the line, waiting to charge my EV, and someone tried to cut the line (such as what Jennifer Granholm did), there is no way that they would get in front of me.
By the way, those charging stations are powered by fossil fuels, making Jennifer Granholm's propaganda event all the more absurd.
That's right. Fossil fuels are used to generate the electricity that powers those charging stations.
2
-
1
-
Where is President* Biden's condemnation of John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Tom Carper, Raphael Warnock (all Democrats):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=434qo6l9_dg
Where is President* Biden's condemnation of Anthony Fauci:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1DT---dYs0
Forbes knows about the above mask violators, and does not tie it to this "Breaking News" Biden plea.
Why should the public take these power-hungry tyrants seriously, when none of them practice what they preach?
Why should the public give a thumb's up to "Forbes Breaking News", when they knowingly and intentionally do not report this hypocrisy?
Why does the author of "Forbes Breaking News" hide in the shadows?
Notice how the viewers have no way to know who actually prepared this video. This is how propaganda works. Make a presentation that attempts to look reputable, yet provide no credits for the person responsible for the presentation. This, too, is done intentionally.
When news was real, you were always told who was doing the reporting. There was never any guess work. You knew who everyone was.
With Forbes Breaking News, it is Mr. Anonymous presenting their version of what is supposed to be news.
1
-
1)
When AI uses closed source code, that should be disclosed. A warning that the AI is programmed by people that might have an agenda, and the output from the AI might reflect such an agenda. Ergo, the output from the AI should not be trusted, implicitly.
The output from an AI will likely contain the biases of the people that programmed the AI.
2)
If an AI is used to impersonate a public official ("deep fake"), or a person running for public office, a public service warning must be included with that impersonation, unless the impersonation is clearly obvious and intended for satire.
3)
If an AI is used to impersonate a public official, for the purpose of issuing a public announcement that is deemed to be from that actual public official, then any harm that is a result of that impersonation will be a violation of the law.
This would be the same as someone wearing make-up, or a mask, and portraying themselves in an official capacity. For example, it is illegal to impersonate a police officer. So if you use an AI to create a deep fake of the Police Commissioner making a public announcement, that would be illegal -- assuming it was not clearly for satire.
4)
If you use an AI to impersonate the CEO of a company (or any executive of a company), then any harm that falls upon the company, as a result of the AI's impersonation, will hold the creator liable.
For example, we can't have a deep fake of a CEO of a food distribution plant making an announcement that baby formula is contaminated with botulism. Anyone creating such a deep fake would be in violation of the law, as well as financial losses of the company, and financial losses of the public for discarding safe food, and chaos that would overwhelm hospitals, etc.
The above goes for impersonating a doctor, a lawyer, or any person that the AI can impersonate and bring harm to the public.
We must not have an AI of the President announcing that missiles were launched, or that biological agents were released in major cities, or that banks are defaulting, etc.
We also must not have AIs spreading fake news, unless the criteria for #1, above, is established.
We should strive for all AIs to make their source code available to the public, and to distrust any AIs whose developers refuse to have their source code examined by the public.
1
-
1
-
@4:04 "Data shows that undocumented (illegal) immigrants, on average, commit fewer crimes, than native born citizens".
Let's unravel that BS:
1) Native born citizens commit the types of crimes that illegal immigrants do not.
For example, cheating on taxes. And illegal immigrants report far, far less crimes committed on them by other illegal immigrants -- so no record exist.
2) Illegal immigrants commit far-and-away more crimes than native born citizens.
3) Notice Melnek's use of "on average".
When you add up the number of crimes committed by 330,000,000 native born citizens, then of course they, in their totality, will commit more crimes.
Melnek did not mean on a 1-to-1 basis. Melnec was comparing, perhaps, 25,000,000 illegal aliens to 330,000,000 native born citizens. So of course the far larger group will have more crimes on record, affecting the average.
In other words, 330,000,000 native born people commit, let's say, 1,000,000 crimes.
But 25,000,000 illegal aliens commit 950,000 crimes. And Melnek reports that as average Americans committing more crimes.
Very deceptive.
4) If white people commit less rape than black people, then according to Melnek's rationale, we should excuse white people for committing rape.
As long as it is less, then nothing to see here -- according to Melnek.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@1:51 "...an assailant..."
Mazie Hirono did not say that the assailant was white. So based on her record of hatred towards white people, and especially white men, we know that the assailant was not white.
If the assailant was white, then Mazie Hirono would have done a cartwheel.
@2:21 "These disturbing and horrifying acts..." and she does mental gymnastics to tie COVID-19 into those attacks, and wins the Olympic Gold for twisting her hatred into concluding that the attacks were racist, with zero evidence of the attacks being racist.
In fact, someone needs to confirm that she did not lie about the attacks taking place. We cannot trust anything that comes out of her mouth.
Perhaps there are elements of truth to her lies. Even habitual liars do not lie 100% of the time.
@3:11 "Over the past two weeks, I worked with senators in both parties..."
Flat out lie.
Mazie Hirono dictated terms to republicans. How do I know?
If anything that any republican asked for was agreed to by Mazie Hirono, she would have bragged to show examples of her being reasonable.
So when Mazei Hirono says that she "worked" with people that she disagrees with, remember that her definition of "worked" is not in the dictionary. Her definition of "worked" is that she exerted intolerance and forced 100% of her agenda on her republican colleagues.
@3:24 "...for her (Senator Collins) good faith efforts to amend this bill..."
This is a textbook example of Mazie Hirono lying.
Did Senator Collins make a good faith effort to amend the bill?
Yes.
Did Mazei Hirono accept those amendements?
No.
So, yes, Senaotor Collins made good faith efforts, and her efforts fell on Mazie Hirono's deaf ears.
@4:42 "We are in this together"
Flat out lie.
Mazei Hirono permits no inclusion from republicans.
Mazei Hirono is part of the swamp. She is one of the keepers of the swamp.
Mazei Hirono is a degenerate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@3:40 "No one making under $400K will see their federal taxes go up, period"
That was a bold-face lie.
Here is his Treasury Secretary, Janet Yellen, re-wording (re-defining) Biden's words:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDXY9CVKSxc
(skip to the 3:08 time mark for the above link to get right to Yellen's edict)
And watch Yellen struggle to get her words out. She knows that she is dropping a bomb, and she gave a "Ya know", with a stutter, and then a visible 'gulp', immediately before dropping the "households" bomb.
Not yet convinced?
Skip to the 3:53 time mark, for the above link.
Where is this being covered in the news?
Forbes clearly knows what Yellen said, and they leave it out of this video, which is all about that exact topic.
This channel is named "Forbes Breaking News", and yet they do not break the news that Biden lied, over and over and over.
Yet another "You can keep your plan and keep your doctor" lie.
1
-
He spewed off titles of bills, talking points, and a list of generalities.
Raise your hand if you can name one thing that his radical, leftist party did that improved anything.
Saying that his party passed "this or that" means zero, without the specifics of the wording contained withing the "this and that".
Radical leftists use titles, all the time, that are clown-world language. They call the Deficit Reduction Act with that name, even though it inflates deficit spending more than any other time in history.
They call lawless cities "sanctuary" cities, when they house countless fugitives from the law. So now "sanctuary" mean protecting criminals, instead of meaning protecting those being persecuted by their governments. "Fugitive" cities are called "sanctuary" cities in clown-world.
They call those breaking the law (burning down buildings, taking over city blocks, routinely blocking roads, etc) "protesters" and "activists". So what used to be standing on the sidewalk, holding up signs, making speeches, all done civilly and lawfully (known as protesting) has become any illegal activity. The constitutionally protected right to protest is now (according to Warnock and his radical leftist party) the right to break the law -- which is clown-world language for "protesting". The next time you get pulled over for speeding, tell the officer you were exercising your right to protest the climate by speeding. See how that goes.
Warnock is a keeper of the Washington swamp. There are those that live in the swamp (the countless government peons that do the bidding of Warnock and his ilk) and then there are the swamp keepers that rule over the swamp dwellers (Warnock, Schumer, Pelosi, Biden, AOC, Waters, Jeffries, Schiff, Lee, Jayapal, Nadler, etc).
Again, raise your hand if you can name one thing that Warnock said that helped anyone or helped our country. Do not name the title of some act you know nothing about. But name one thing that a typical American would understand. You can't. Because he said a mouth full of Washington, slimy used car salesman, mumbo jumbo, BS.
Warnock and the rest of his party's radical leftists are degenerates.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Fire Chief Anthony Marrone gave all kinds of number of people involved, and support centers, etc, as if the goal was for us to fill in numbers on a spreadsheet.
He could tell us that he has 1,000,000 firefighters, and what good will that do, when they have no water?
The "air" resources are the only meaningful tool, because they actually carry water. But air resources are meant to support ground forces, and to extinguish new, small hot-spots.
It is ground forces that are 90% responsible for containing and extinguishing fires. Since there is no water for the ground forces, the air forces will have little impact on the fire.
I hope that I am wrong, but nearly nothing will change in the coming days. The fires will continue to rage on, because they have no water.
Both Chief Anthony Marrone and Mayor Karen Bass have already conveyed their upcoming failures, when they brought up the wind.
For those that do not know, Los Angeles is governed 100% by Democrats. Every agency, bar none, is headed by a Democrat.
And the people of Los Angeles will probably re-elect them (or other Democrats).
1
-
1
-
1
-
If you placed 5 rifles in front of Alejandro Mayorkas, he would have no clue which one is an AK-47 (even if none of the 5 were an AK-47). Yet, he wants to ban them.
If you asked Alejandro Mayorkas to specify what feature(s) the AK-47 has, that he finds to be the criteria for it to be banned, he would have no idea.
Like a child in an adult body, stomping his feet, saying "Just because!", or "I just want them banned!".
And Alejandro Mayorkas will not stop at the AK-47.
He will ban every gun, without exception, if he had his way. For now, he says "assault weapon". That will, one day, lead to every weapon, if Alejandro Mayorkas has his way.
That is why is has no clue what an assault weapon is, because it is not about any particular gun. He wants all guns banned, and uses the "assault weapon" propaganda line to push his anti-Second Amendment, unconstitutional, radical leftist agenda down the throats of the American people.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1) There will always be suffering around the world.
If the United States spent 100% of its revenue on ending suffering in other countries, hardly a dent in that suffering would be made. We would not end suffering in a single country. Just look at our own country, and then ask yourself if we would magically fix the suffering in foreign lands.
As long as those foreign countries retain their current form of government, the United States cannot stop the damage that their own governments create for their own people.
2) The stronger the United States is, the more we could do for people around the world.
By creating huge deficits for ourselves, our power declines, making our effort less and less effective, even within our own borders.
3) Regardless of the amendment being debated, the United States is already sending countless $billions to foreign countries. Raise your hand if you can follow the trail of where any of those $billions end up.
4) Corruption is like nothing the world has ever seen. Our tax dollars are being pocketed by criminals all over the world. In every case where we send $billions (or even $millions), much of it falls into the hands of criminals.
No one watches and traces the funds that we send. No one in congress an testify that the X $billions dollars we sent to this place or that place actually went to this place or that place.
The best a congressperson could do is state that this or that watchdog group put out this or that report. Anyone reading those reports? And no one knows whether or not this or that report is credible. The watchdog groups are probably rife with corruption.
5) We have massive corruption within our own government.
Can you imagine what goes on in foreign lands, when we send them $billions?
American families are struggling to pay their bills, have shelter, and feed themselves. Millions of Americans are on welfare. Millions of Americans live in the street. And Barbara Lee wants to send $billions (that we have to borrow from China) to foreign lands where much of it will fall into the pockets of thieves.
1
-
I hope that President Trump has staff that is tracking every corrupt Biden official (as well as other corrupt government employees), and details / evidence about their corruption, so that when President Trump returns to the oval office, he can have hew Attorney General bring justice to them all.
President Trump needs to pick a strong, no nonsense Attorney General, that will hire staff that are also no nonsense, and bring appropriate charges against all of them for their corruption.
This needs to be organized now, to be ready on day 1 of President Trump's return to the oval office.
Four years is a short period of time to bring a sea of corrupt people to justice.
Many high ranking people will be more difficult to catch. So it will take catching others who make plea deals, to bring high ranking corrupt personnel to justice. This all takes lots of time. Again, that is why this needs to be tracked now, and be ready to go on day 1 of President Trump's return to the oval office.
President Trump must pick the right Attorney General, who, in turn, must hire the right staff, who, in turn, must hire the right staff, etc. A superstar team of legal policing must be put in place to clean house of so many corrupt officials. It will be a team effort, and must be organized by experts who will not be deterred from their oath of office.
1
-
1