Comments by "Perhaps" (@NoEgg4u) on "Reuters"
channel.
-
10
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I am repeating what I wrote previously:
Apps are at mercy of the OS.
If the OS's kernel is coded to delete the app, or to disable the app, then the app will disappear or not function.
Have you heard of cases where, after an OS upgrade, an app had problems?
Have you heard of cases where you must be running OS version XYZ, in order for an app to be compatible?
When your smart phone pulls in and installs a new OS, or a patch for the existing OS is applied, it will prevent TikTok from running.
It will do so because it will be mandated by our government, and corporations will be compelled to issue the OS patch.
With everything that computers can do, and that they do do, I do not understand why you think that TikTok, or any app, is immune to the code of the platform on which it runs.
1
-
1
-
@elizabethhenning778 I do not know if you really believe the nonsense in that list that you wrote, or if you are advocating for fraudulent voting in pursuit of your liberal agenda
-- If you believe that there are no bad actors out there, then you are out of touch with reality.
-- If you believe that very, very smart people, that know every facet of voting security measures, never use their knowledge to change votes, then you are out of touch with reality.
-- If you believe that people do not risk a felony conviction, to change an election, then you are out of touch with reality.
-- If you believe that the United States has a way to apprehend foreign criminals, after they commit their voting crimes and leave our country, then you are out of touch with reality.
Voter fraud:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkLuXvIxFew
Voter fraud:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYaB5cd2plA
(skip to 3:33 for the above link)
Voter fraud:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3_0x6oaDmI
(goes into all aspects of voter fraud)
Voter fraud:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkH2r-sNjQs
1
-
@0:13
"...but his own republican party is scrambling to counter the President's message..."
Fabrication.
@1:09
"The terms 'absentee voting' and 'mail in balloting' are synonymous in most US states. Both generally mean filling out a ballot and dropping it in the mail"
Another lie.
The terms "absentee voting" and "mail in balloting" are not synonymous, in any way, where it counts: And what counts is verify-ability.
The people getting absentee ballots are vetted and individually approved, based on not being able to vote locally (such as known personnel serving on military ships at sea).
Whereas, mail in voting is rife with both incompetence and corruption. Millions and millions of ballots are mass mailed, with no verification, whatsoever, that the recipients exists, or that the ballots reach the intended recipients, or that the intended recipients are the ones that fill out the ballots.
Imagine, for example, nursing homes, where anyone could coerce the patients, or not even deliver the ballots to the patients -- and get filled out by the person in the mail room.
@1:23
"Election experts who have studied decades of US elections say such cheating is rare".
-- Experts? What experts?
-- Who are these "experts"?
-- How many of these experts are there?
-- Who decreed these people to be experts?
-- Who are these experts voting for?
If there are 100 experts, and 98 say mail in voting if rife with fraud, and 2 say that fraud is rare, then Reuters claim that:
"Election experts who have studied decades of US elections say such cheating is rare" is true. All it takes are two so-called experts for their misleading statement to be technically correct.
Reuters knows this. But Reuters wants the fraud.
Reuters wants their candidate, Joe Biden, to win, and fairness and voting laws be damned.
Reuters is an unofficial arm of the Democrat National Committee, masquerading as a news organization.
1