Comments by "Perhaps" (@NoEgg4u) on "Reuters" channel.

1) It is a question of scale. When done by mail, votes can be thrown away by the truck load. When voting in person, it is nearly impossible to fraudulently report the count entered into the voting machine. And if a machine is violated, it is one machine, not a truck load of votes. 2) Ballots are sent out to dead people. Anyone can fill it out and mail it back. 3) Ballots can be mailed to countless BS addresses, filled out by who-knows-who, and mailed back. 4) BS ballots can be printed, not mailed, and filled out by political hacks and mailed in. 5) The democrats are desperate for shoving this down our throats. So that clearly leaves no doubt that they will use fraudulent mail-in ballots to steal elections, and not honor the will of the people.
10
There was a time in Germany, when they searched people's homes. When the home owners objected, the gestapo police said "Why should you object if you have nothing to hide?"
5
@0:55 "But Trump has repeatedly made baseless claims, that voting by mail will lead to rampant fraud" The host got criss-crossed. Her biased, fake news, intentionally lying about the safety of mail-in voting is what is baseless. She is infected with Trump Derangement Syndrome. She, however, does a good job at pretending to control her rage.
4
If folks found out that the Communist China government was scraping their computer and smartphone screens, and capturing everything that they are doing, they would have a $h!t fit. They would complain: "Why hasn't President Trump stopped this!" TikTok does just that, but on a lesser scale (but still quite invasive). Even Biden's campaign has banned TikTok for all of his staff, and all of the family members of his staff. The President is stopping a hostile, foreign adversary from maintaining a huge spy network across the youth of America. Put your partisan bickering aside, and understand that TikTok is a national security threat, and banning it is commensurate with the sworn duties of the Office Of The Presidency.
3
@1:25 "Election experts say voter fraud of any kind, including incidents related to mail-in ballots, is extremely rare" She might as well have said: "Jesus and Moses came to me in a dream, and promised virtually no voter fraud". Why not say that? She claims "experts" made that assertion. What experts? Who are they? What are their names? What makes them experts? Who are those experts voting for? Experts disagree with each other on nearly anything and everything. So you can find experts that will say the earth is flat, and they will sound convincing. We have experts telling us that eliminating the police will reduce crime. Reuters is a fake news organization. The above BS reporting is an example of their fake, irresponsible, and intentionally misleading reporting. They are an unofficial arm of the Democrat National Committee, masquerading as a news organization. Cheers!
1
@Hobostarr180 , President Trump is banning the app. He is not banning the network. If you cannot use the app, then the network is meaningless. Or look at it this way: I have an app. It is named the "I_do_not_exist" app. Try using my "I_do_not_exist" app over VPN.
1
Yes, any app can be banned. Smartphone companies can either delete the apps from phones where it is installed, or push out an OS patch that will block existing installations of the app. Network providers can block the app from having network access. If it becomes law, or if the President Of The United States Of America signs an executive order, the app will be history.
1
All apps are at the mercy of the OS. If an app is banned, the programmers will update the OS to disable and/or delete the app. Please name an app that has been banned.
1
I am repeating what I wrote previously: Apps are at mercy of the OS. If the OS's kernel is coded to delete the app, or to disable the app, then the app will disappear or not function. Have you heard of cases where, after an OS upgrade, an app had problems? Have you heard of cases where you must be running OS version XYZ, in order for an app to be compatible? When your smart phone pulls in and installs a new OS, or a patch for the existing OS is applied, it will prevent TikTok from running. It will do so because it will be mandated by our government, and corporations will be compelled to issue the OS patch. With everything that computers can do, and that they do do, I do not understand why you think that TikTok, or any app, is immune to the code of the platform on which it runs.
1
@libraryofwisdom4 Trump is pushing for an honest election. The democrats are pushing for a win, and election laws and the integrity of the election be damned.
1
@elizabethhenning778 I do not know if you really believe the nonsense in that list that you wrote, or if you are advocating for fraudulent voting in pursuit of your liberal agenda -- If you believe that there are no bad actors out there, then you are out of touch with reality. -- If you believe that very, very smart people, that know every facet of voting security measures, never use their knowledge to change votes, then you are out of touch with reality. -- If you believe that people do not risk a felony conviction, to change an election, then you are out of touch with reality. -- If you believe that the United States has a way to apprehend foreign criminals, after they commit their voting crimes and leave our country, then you are out of touch with reality. Voter fraud: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkLuXvIxFew Voter fraud: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYaB5cd2plA (skip to 3:33 for the above link) Voter fraud: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3_0x6oaDmI (goes into all aspects of voter fraud) Voter fraud: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkH2r-sNjQs
1
@0:13 "...but his own republican party is scrambling to counter the President's message..." Fabrication. @1:09 "The terms 'absentee voting' and 'mail in balloting' are synonymous in most US states. Both generally mean filling out a ballot and dropping it in the mail" Another lie. The terms "absentee voting" and "mail in balloting" are not synonymous, in any way, where it counts: And what counts is verify-ability. The people getting absentee ballots are vetted and individually approved, based on not being able to vote locally (such as known personnel serving on military ships at sea). Whereas, mail in voting is rife with both incompetence and corruption. Millions and millions of ballots are mass mailed, with no verification, whatsoever, that the recipients exists, or that the ballots reach the intended recipients, or that the intended recipients are the ones that fill out the ballots. Imagine, for example, nursing homes, where anyone could coerce the patients, or not even deliver the ballots to the patients -- and get filled out by the person in the mail room. @1:23 "Election experts who have studied decades of US elections say such cheating is rare". -- Experts? What experts? -- Who are these "experts"? -- How many of these experts are there? -- Who decreed these people to be experts? -- Who are these experts voting for? If there are 100 experts, and 98 say mail in voting if rife with fraud, and 2 say that fraud is rare, then Reuters claim that: "Election experts who have studied decades of US elections say such cheating is rare" is true. All it takes are two so-called experts for their misleading statement to be technically correct. Reuters knows this. But Reuters wants the fraud. Reuters wants their candidate, Joe Biden, to win, and fairness and voting laws be damned. Reuters is an unofficial arm of the Democrat National Committee, masquerading as a news organization.
1