Comments by "Perhaps" (@NoEgg4u) on "Don't Walk, Run! Productions"
channel.
-
183
-
64
-
49
-
47
-
34
-
19
-
18
-
13
-
12
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
8
-
6
-
The Electoral College prevents fraud from affecting other states.
So if one corrupt town stuffs their ballot boxes, they could swing the state. But that is it.
If the President was chosen strictly by the popular vote, then every election, we would have recounts everywhere. Absolutely everywhere.
Every court in the land would be inundated with lawsuits.
Remember Bush vs. Gore and the Florida gridlock?
Without the Electoral College, that gridlock would have no bounds.
Did the Democrat win California. Probably. But did California stuff ballot boxes? Probably. Does it change the election results? Unlikely, because California would go Democrat, anyway. But without the Electoral College, those extra, fraudulent ballots in California cause the results of the election to change nation-wide.
One small town, anywhere, would be able to swing the election, if it were based on the popular vote.
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
@7:28 -- The Florida recount:
Folks, the Electoral College ensures that corruption by a state, or by a county in a state, does not spread beyond that state's borders.
In other words, if the corruption does not get addressed, then it will win the state for the cheaters. But since the popular vote does not count, the winning of the state (albeit bad), will normally not change an election.
Without the Electoral College, a single, corrupt, voting precinct would upset the totals for the nation.
The Electoral College prevents the cheating from affecting the totals for the nation.
Also, as it pertains to Florida.
There were endless court battles. But those court cases were limited to Florida.
Without the Electoral College, then after every election, we would have endless court battles in every local, state, and federal court, from sea to shining sea.
The founding fathers were brilliant.
1
-
@3:56 "In fact, we produced more oil domestically in my first year in office than my predecessor did in his first year"
The question is: Why?
Answer:
In President Trump's first year, he was taking over from President Obama, who was anti-oil. So it took President Trump nearly a year to undo the damage from his predecessor and ramp up domestic oil production.
For President* Biden, he took over from President Trump. So in Biden's first year, the domestic oil production was on blast from the Trump administration. But in the months after President* Biden took office, he killed oil production, leading to what we now have.
Imagine an idiot buying a company from a genius.
It takes time for the idiot to destroy the company. In the first few months that the idiot owns the company, it will still be in great shape form the genius that owned it. But a year or two later, that idiot's mismanagement of the company becomes terminal.
Such is the case of President* Biden's first year, after being handed a booming economy and oil production.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Without the right to keep and bear arms, We The People cannot have a well regulated militia, a well oiled militia, a well dressed militia, a well bathed militia, a well [fill in the blank militia], or an unwell militia, or any militia.
Regardless of how anyone chooses to interpret "well regulated", you can't have that without the right to keep and bear arms.
And radical leftists know that. They simply use any mumbo-jumbo language to attack our right to keep and bear arms.
None of our constitutional freedoms are derived form any government entity.
None of our constitutional freedoms need approval from any government entity.
Yet, radical leftists tell us that the government dictates our Second Amendment freedom. They have that backwards. But with tyrants, it is all about their power, by way of attempting to take away The People's power.
We need our Second Amendment, precisely because of Jamaal Bowman, and like-minded, tyrannical, radical leftists like him.
1
-
1
-
The Electoral College stops fraud at the state's border.
Without the Electoral College:
If a state like Rhode Island were to stuff ballot boxes, then that tiny state could swing the election. The Electoral College prevents that, because Rhode Island gets a fixed number of votes. So they, or any state, can fraudulently add 10,000,000 votes, and the worst that would happen is that their state votes red or blue. Their fraud affects only their state.
Also, remember the Bush / Gore election?
Remember the never-ending law suits that took place in Florida, because the winner of the election came down to which way Florida's votes went?
Without the Electoral College, every district, town, city, state and federal court, from sea to shining sea, would contest the vote count. They would all tie up the courts trying to add votes, cancel votes, and who knows what else. They would do this because if they can get their way, then they swing the election. So our courts would grind to a halt. We would never have a final vote for who one the election. We would have a constitutional crisis.
Our founding fathers knew this. They created the Electoral College to prevent this.
Our founding fathers were brilliant!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CrazyNavajo007 You wrote that I was upset. Therefore, I asked you to quote where I wrote that I was upset.
Rather than quoting me writing that I was upset, you quoted my entire comment, which does not contain me writing that I was upset.
Madam, you are an attention seeking troll.
And giving your own useless comment a thumb's up is pathetic. Yes, you voted your own comment up. That you are starving for attention so badly, that you actually voted up your own comment, is sad. Pathetic, transparent, and trolling is not an esteemed trifecta.
Reply with anything that you want. Now that I have identified you as a troll, I will not reply.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It does not matter that the DNC posted the factually incorrect tweet. Why?
That tweet is in Kamala Harris' name. When Harris gave the DNC permission to speak (tweet) in her name, then Harris owns the tweet.
If anyone feels that Harris does not own the tweets that are tweeted by the people that she approved to make the tweets, then consider the following:
-- The DNC can tweet out anything they want.
When it works, and goes over well, then Harris gets the glory.
When it does not work, and it goes down in flames, then Harris has nothing to do with it, because someone else sent out the tweet.
No sir. It does not work that way.
When you delegate a job to someone or some entity, then you are on the hook for what they do in your name. You gave them permission to use your name, and now you own what they do in your name. And in Harris' case, not only did she give the DNC permission to tweet in her name, she actually assigned the job to them. Do not think, for a minute, that the DNC is doing this without Harris delegating it to them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@10:36 -- It is not the end of our "Constitutional Democracy", because the United States of America is not, and has never been, a Constitutional Democracy.
America is, and has always been, a Constitutional Republic.
And yet radical, woke, leftist, democrat, David Jolly, is lecturing us on our Constitution, when he either does not know the basics, or is lying to our faces.
1
-
Folks, now we know how Hitler was able to rise to power in Germany. He jailed people for speech, and now Germany is at it, again.
Hitler used his Gestapo police, and, today, Germany is at it, again.
Vice President J. D. Vance's speech was a warning to Germany, and other European nations, to end their march to totalitarianism. This is a sign that President Trump is going to end America's alliance with NATO.
With several European countries being taken over by mass migration (it is wildly out of control), and the leaders of those countries jailing their own citizens for nonsense, the United States of America can neither rely on nor trust those nations -- and it is only getting worse. Those nations are not what they were during World War II. And those nations have not even been paying their NATO dues.
So get ready for President Trump to cut ties with NATO, and reset our alliances. Vice President J. D. Vance has warned them.
By the way, if any citizen of Germany would say what Vice President J. D. Vance said at that conference, Germany's current day Gestapo agents would jail them. If any German citizen tweets Vice President J. D. Vance's remarks, they will be arrested. That is how bad it is in Germany.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1