Comments by "Nobodyherepal" (@nobodyherepal3292) on "Military History Visualized" channel.

  1. Oh so that’s why they keep finding corps worth of gear left behind to take….
    9
  2. Then NATO glasses all Russian troop concentrations in eastern Ukraine in kind.
    6
  3. Except it’s the flanks, and they have yet to bounce back in over 3 months…. Against 3 separate offensives….
    5
  4.  @dickthehead1145 you mean Russia fight really badly at war😉
    5
  5. Might have something to do with the kalashinilovs at there heads….
    5
  6. Well leaving all your gear behind kinda defeats the purpose of that. As of this month, Russia is Ukrainian’s biggest arms provider.
    5
  7. Good thing the Ukrainians love the cold too.
    4
  8. Russia is in the same boat. They haven’t won a war since 1945 too.
    4
  9. Have you not seen the blitzkrieg they pulled off around Kharkiv or the Russians now evacuating Kherson my guy? What do you think that all was?
    4
  10.  @dickthehead1145  so badly that they have a “7-1” kill ratio, but have ran away from 10,000+kms of terrain (about half their gains) multiple major cities and oblasts, and are now running away from more terrain around Bakmut this last week as well, then they’ve captured in the last 6 months . 😉
    4
  11.  @tangobayus  my brother in christ, they took. Almost 6K km in a single month back from the Russians and captured a tank corps worth of gear in the process. Just to day they broke the left flank of the Kherson line. What the hell are you smoking?
    3
  12.  @tangobayus  on top of that ,Putin wouldn’t be threatening the use of nukes if it was “no big deal”
    3
  13. Ukrainian drone crews grinning with glee 😂
    3
  14.  @stinkypete891  the ones I see f@c king russian conscripts on a daily basis😉
    3
  15.  @dwarow2508  the UK and Germany were actively fighting each other in North Africa, Greece, in the Atlantic Ocean, the Mediterranean Sea and the UK was bombing Germany semi-regularly at night in 1941. That is the complete opposite of a Non-aggression pact. And you asked what allied power was on the continent in 1941, and it was Greece, with British support. Sorry you can’t understand basic facts bud. 🤷‍♂️
    3
  16.  @Keckegenkai  accept appeasement was well over by 1941. That’s what I’m not understanding.
    3
  17.  @johngriffiths118 except farmers 😊
    3
  18. 1) bullshit. Japan was hell bent on expansion and was going to attack America at some point. Maybe 1942 or 43, but it was GOING to happen eventually. 2) in the end, the world is much better place today thanks to America entering the war and helping to defeat the axis powers.
    3
  19.  @Fronzel41  apparently they didn’t, because they wouldn’t have built their fleet around fighting the US navy in a massive “decisive battle” with there Yamato class super battleships and fleet carriers, not would they have signed a non-aggression pact with the Soviets if they weren’t intent on waging a war with America across the pacific.
    3
  20.  @Mortablunt  my brother in christ, their literally on the attack, right now gaining ground in Kherson. Yet I got bots like you constantly spouting “Ukraine will fall any day now” since March. Yet here we are.
    3
  21.  @dickthehead1145  well I can say the Russians failed to stop NATO expansion too. We literally just had Finland join last month, and Sweden is in the process of joining too. So throw that up on the long list of Russian failures this war too.
    3
  22. Well then, it would be wise if they pack up go home already.
    3
  23. Huh. I didn’t think throwing waves of engineers and tanks away at the same bridgehead to enemy drones and artillery is considered “a complex operation” cough Izyum cough
    3
  24.  @nikosg1386  apparently non of the forced l-conscripts seem to care all that much for defending conquered land. They keep surrendering when ever they get the chance. And honestly I hope we keep supporting Ukraine with we’ve increasing amounts of weapons and ammo. I’m glad to see my tax money finally used for something good for once.
    3
  25.  @nikosg1386  it’s been 7 months and I haven’t noticed any of these supposed “price hikes” people keep ranting about.
    3
  26.  @stinkypete891  Russian agents and traitors it seems. Who’s getting pushed out windows in Moscow lately? 🧐
    2
  27. Would you give up, to an enemy hell bent on conquering and enslaving your people?
    2
  28. Ok, what about shipping over some Older m1a1’s from the Arizona desert?
    2
  29.  @RomanHistoryFan476AD  well it’s not done yet, so how about some Tomahawks for the time being?
    2
  30. America wouldn’t have accepted it.
    2
  31. this isn’t WW2. 1 modern tank could destroy easily a battalion if WW2 era tanks a day, and most of them wouldn’t even know we’re there being shot from. The only thing holding back a modern tank, would be the supply of ammunition, fuel, and supporting assets (recon, air support, artillery, infantry screens ect.)
    2
  32.  @Anton_Frey United Europe?? 🤡
    2
  33.  @dwarow2508  how does that make the UK and Germany “Allies” my guy?
    2
  34.  @dwarow2508  oh so the anti U-boat war to prevent the UK from being starved out by Germany, and to help supply the western Allies operations in Africa, Italy and Europe was “irrelevant” to you? Never mind securing sea-lanes to supply lend lease to the USSR or build up the D-Day landing force . What are you smoking?
    2
  35.  @dwarow2508  they nearly did by early 1942. The US joining the war is what turned it around for the Allies at sea.
    2
  36. And it’s based as hell. I love being the Arsenal of Democracy again.
    2
  37. I thought about that too, and, as the video stated, it seems Ukraine just sends the broken equipment back over to Poland to NATO repair shops to get them back into service. Almost all the NATO supplied weapons use the same ammo too. I think the main issue for Ukraine is just the transportation of the gear and ammo around trying to avoid Russian logistical interference.
    2
  38.  @Fronzel41  the US never planned to conquer all of south east Asia or the entire Pacific over some ridicules “Devine right to rule” like Japan did. In either case, despite people in the Japanese leadership saying it was a terrible idea, Japan still was going to go to war with America. It’s crazy imperialistic leadership we’re hell bent on it, seeing how they were too scared to attack the Soviet Union.
    2
  39. That are currently counter attacking for the third time this war?😂
    2
  40.  @dickthehead1145  my brother in hell, if the Ukrainian army has been supposedly destroyed twice now, why isn’t the Russian military in Kyiv already ? Hell, why isn’t Kherson, Kharkiv, Izyum, Kyiv, Lymen, and Kupyansk completely reduced to ruble now, if the Russians bring up all their artillery to ping the Ukrainians with? Probably because artillery has never actually destroyed an enemy army by itself in any war in history. Just ask the krauts at Vurdun if the millions of shells they fired got them anything in the end, compared to the French, who took there territory back in the end.
    2
  41. Was their even 750,000 native Americans back in 1941?
    2
  42. How? Japan was always going to have to fight the United States, If it wanted to see its “co-prosperity sphere” created. It was always going to have to go after the Philippines to reach the oil feilds of Dutch Indonesia, so a war with America was always going to happen so long as imperial Japanese existed.
    2
  43.  @didymussumydid9726  if they didnt want war in China, why did they even start it back in 1934? Why not call it off in 1938 or 39 when they took all of chinas coastline? They kept attacking China well into 1940 and 41, killing countless Chinese civilians in bombing raids and massacres. Most infamously, the Rape of Nanking. And yes, Dutch oil would have been necessary for imperial japans goal of a self-sufficient South Pacific spanning empire it’s leaders envisioned. And they couldn’t do it without taking the US controlled Philippines or Third Island chain.
    2
  44. I was neutral until I saw the images out of Butcha, mauriopol And serverdonensk. Now i hope my nations Lend Lease supplies sends the Russians to hell.
    2
  45. Well I mean, plenty of the NATO supplies stuff we sent is already is being used at the front, so ya. I can at least say most of it is making through.
    2
  46.  @foksai1699  history shows they do. Just ask the Germans and Romanians.
    1
  47. If it only takes 13 billion to crush one of our “pier adversaries” we spend 800 billion a year trying to defend against, then ya, there a paper tiger. And I’m quite content watching my tax money at work 👍🇺🇸
    1
  48.  @fullm3taljacket  what you mean like 1991,2003, and 2017?
    1
  49.  @Someone-lr6gu  well…. There’s always Turkish m60s.
    1
  50. Are you high on copium or drunk on vatnik propaganda?
    1