Comments by "Nobodyherepal" (@nobodyherepal3292) on "The Wall Street Journal" channel.

  1. 1972 for the t-72 > 1995 for challenger 2. Ya, I’d say the T-72 is a bit long in the tooth now.
    10
  2. @Shaquille Oatmeal oh don’t worry, it will come here if we don’t keep helping Ukraine. . Putin is already sizing up Alaska.
    6
  3. Pretty well apparently. The lancet can’t penetrate MBT armor, and the Sharid drone can’t hit a moving target.
    4
  4. Which haven’t stopped Ukraines T-72s yet 😂
    4
  5.  @thephoenix756  so why haven’t they destroyed all of Ukraines armor force yet and didn’t stop running away for almost 6 months?
    3
  6.  @thephoenix756  so why did Russia run away from a force that has no tanks for 6 months straight?
    3
  7. The Arsenal of Democracy once again.
    2
  8.  @FProductions64  we will. At least we have a place to stay, unlike the Ukrainians who’s houses keep getting bombed. I’ll gladly pay more if it means we can get more weapons and ammo To fight with.
    2
  9.  @GGkorok  so the Texans can finally live there Red Dawn fantasy? If only Putin was so kind….
    2
  10.  @duckman5274  it’s not fiction, we did it in 1991. And seeing how badly the Russian military functions, we could do it again.
    2
  11. We are though
    2
  12.  @thephoenix756  no, Russia will just hit another defences line for months on end again, while Ukraine takes back meltipol
    2
  13. So why did Russia call it “ a red line” if the west sent tanks, if it’s “no big deal really” 🤡
    2
  14. For what? Letting Ukraine fight back?
    2
  15. Well that didn’t age well. Just yesterday Ukraine used both western anti-radar missiles and appear to now possess ATACM missiles for there Himars.
    1
  16.  @felixthecat4536  I do. And they want more weapons to kill the bastards who took everything from them. The Russians .
    1
  17. And as of yesterday, I think it’s confirmed the ATACM missiles have arrived.
    1
  18. The US didn’t attack Russia. Ukraine simply returned Russia the favor for all the bombings
    1
  19. We did. It’s called Lend Lease. They can have anything short of nuclear weapons. The only variable is training time, and stockpile supplies.
    1
  20.  Hunter Brandon  hey, we got plenty of lend lease to send.
    1
  21. lol. And Russia invading and occupying Ukraine wasn’t “escalation”? 😂
    1
  22. No, they still would only have about 15% occupied still. And then they lose it all not long after western armor arrives.
    1
  23.  @k-ron7403  we have 31 on the way, and they’ll be ready by April
    1
  24.  @snidecommenter7117  apparently that’s in place already, because plenty of the weapons we send make it to the front and kill the orcs
    1
  25.  @turkiye8598  Ukraine took his reputation and fear.
    1
  26. Ok 1) show me proof of there destruction, because the DOD is keeping a close eye on them and 2) don’t worry buddy, we got plenty more toys to send to the Ukrainians 😊
    1
  27. We sent 16, and the Russians really don’t like showing proof of the “destruction” of HIMARS or seems.
    1
  28. lol, this ain’t WW3. Trumps appeasement will only lead us to warz
    1