Comments by "Nobodyherepal" (@nobodyherepal3292) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1.  @robkit007  the world where Russia is running around with tanks from the 50s (and now apparently building sheds on top of them), where their conscripts are constantly going into the battle with older obsolete gear, where the Russians STILL don’t have air supremacy almost 3 years into a major conventional war with a country 1/10th their own size, and one where the Russians have lost most of their Black Sea fleet in a land war to a country with no navy. So, I live in reality.
    5
  2.  @robkit007  not my fault you can’t accept reality.
    5
  3. How the are the Russians going to open a new front at Odessa, when they don’t have the fleet to support such a landing?
    5
  4. No, it’s just the facts
    4
  5.  @robkit007  Russia obviously hasn’t won, because it’s still fighting. Get over it,
    4
  6. Evidently not, because Ukraine is still managing to produce military hardware, even after 3 years of missile attacks
    4
  7.  @maalikserebryakov  reported for ligma
    4
  8. It does look like Gaza. Mauripol, serverdonesk, Bakmut, Vuladar, Marinka, and now Avdiivka all look like wastelands after Russian “liberation”. At least 1/4 of Kherson is under water after the Russians blew the dam there last summer too. The only reason Odessa, Kyiv, Kharkiv, Kyiv, and the rest don’t look like wastelands, is the western supplied air defense making such a bombing campaign too expensive for Russia to pull off,
    3
  9. History legends also said Kherson should never all, Kharkiv in 2022 was a trap, Kyiv was a “feint” and Bakmut was going to end the war, so….
    3
  10. Yes. Hes been right pretty much the entire time.
    3
  11. 1) it always has been 2) because the US didn’t level entire cities to do so, and actually repaired the damage it caused once the war was over.
    2
  12.  @buschtaxi75driver55  again, the only reason they don’t look like Gaza right now is because of western supplied air defenses making such a bombing campaign too expensive for Russia.
    2
  13.  @buschtaxi75driver55  not at all. If they were, Kyiv wouldn’t be able to hit Belgrod with drones or Sevastopol with last generation western Missiles then…. And if western air defense was so bad, Moscow wouldn’t be throwing literally hundreds of drones and missiles at it per barrages at Odessa and Kyiv just to get less then a dozen hits out of it….
    2
  14.  @buschtaxi75driver55  ya, and notice the Ukrainians haven’t used a single western supplied weapon in Russians soil. Even ATACMS was used on Ukrainian territoy occupied by Russia
    2
  15.  @buschtaxi75driver55  the Czechs don’t have a missile that can reach Belgorod from Ukraine bud.
    2
  16.  @buschtaxi75driver55  pls do your research and tell me what Czech missile system has the range to hit Belgorod from Ukraine. The Czechs don’t have a missile system that can reach out almost 100kms.
    2
  17.  @buschtaxi75driver55  ok, so what Czech missile specifically was Ukraine given that can shoot over 100kms. I’ll wait.
    2
  18.  @buschtaxi75driver55  so a rocket artillery system that has a range of about 20kms somehow hit Belgorod over 100kms away? Man, and I thought the Russian education system couldn’t possibly get worse 🤡
    2
  19. Like he’s got any other choice but to either lose or leave.
    2
  20.  @marianoaugustoormadtejejer5663  probably so. There passwords at this rate are probably worthless
    2
  21.  @MrZlocktar  yes, History legends did. Many times in his videos.
    2
  22.  @MrZlocktar  yes, history legends videos.
    2
  23.  @MrZlocktar  I answered your request. History legend has plenty of videos going back close to 3 years now on just Ukraine on his channel where he says everything I’ve claimed. You’re welcome to watch them, if you can handle that much concentrated BS and copium.
    2
  24.  @MrZlocktar  I’m not. Count the sheer amount of videos history legends made about Bakmut alone (its close to 14 last I checked) and in each one he hyped up that battle like it’s the deciding battle of the war.
    2
  25. They weren’t
    2
  26.  @claus-not-santa  you should to, because “despite 8 years of bombing”, Donetsk and Luhansk look pretty well off, compared to what the Russians did to Bakmut in just under 1 year of war….
    2
  27.  @claus-not-santa  not nearly enough.
    2
  28. So why arnt the Russians in Kyiv already?
    2
  29.  @iandavies6575  so their going to be at war forever basically? Because the long game, would be taking Kyiv, Odessa, Kharkiv, Lviv ect. Not bashing their heads against a brick wall on their otherside of the country while losing close to half a million of their own in the process…
    2
  30.  @robkit007  then Russia is going to be at war forever then….
    2
  31.  @iandavies6575  really? You actually think the Russians are going to take Odessa without a fleet to conduct a naval landing with? Because they can’t go by land, with the Kherson dam gone that river is now bigger AND more chaotic now. Nevermind having to retake Kherson and then Mykolaiv (somthing they couldn’t do even 2 years ago when they still had a usable bridge) And how they going to take Kharkiv, when it’s bigger than any city they’ve fought in up to this point? It’s 3x the size of Bakmut and surrounded by settlements roughly equal to avidiivka. And with what forces? They’re all stuck fighting in the south or donbass.
    2
  32.  @robkit007  the truth of the situation
    2
  33.  @robkit007  the war is still ongoing and Russia is losing, get over it.
    2
  34.  @iandavies6575  you are actually delusional then.
    2
  35.  @annemllerpetersen1929 you guys have been saying that since 2022, and all Russia has done is either lose more land gains, lose more ships, and fail to win the war.
    2
  36.  @borgazvoda7590  say what ever you want, I’ll gladly pay more for fuel, if it helps kill more Russian communists. “The US ran out of weapons”. What a joke. We got plenty of stuff still to send. An entire 15mile square storage yard in Arizona in fact. We can keep up the lends ease for quite awhile. No more appeasement for Putin. Least we fight him in the Baltics, Poland, and Alaska.
    2
  37.  @robkit007  I’m not the one who thinks Russia is somehow going to win this war still, not that Ukraine isn’t going to join NATO as soon as the war is over.
    2
  38.  @robkit007  nope. People just agree with me I guess.
    2
  39.  @robkit007  if they’ve won the war already, why are all the Z-boys out here saying Chasiv Yar is going to be the next goal? And why would Ukraine not join NATO the minuet the war is over? It’s not in their best interest to not join the alliance as soon as possible.
    2
  40.  @robkit007  lol, you think I’m going to dig through a few years worth of comments just to laugh at you when they join? 🤣
    2
  41.  @robkit007  I’d say the same to you, when Ukraine joins NATO in a few years.
    2
  42. So, losing tons of conscripts for a few meters of land a month. Gotcha.
    2
  43. No, they just said “screw it, as long as we don’t use American made weapons to do it, the Yankees won’t care”. And there right.
    1
  44. You get 99 more riflemen
    1
  45. And the Russians lose men and equipment faster then anyone. If they keep it up, they’ll have a repeat of 1917 on their hands.
    1
  46. Well that failed spectacularly, because the FRL is still active there
    1
  47. Meanwhile, the Russians barley launch missile attacks anymore, and their troops are running around in mad-max vehicles, but sure, Russia Totally has plenty of ammo left 🙄🤣
    1
  48. Meanwhile, Tass, Sputnik and RT are just so reliable right?
    1
  49. Ya, no. Russia is going to lose this war, and no amount of refurbished tanks from some Cold War storage depot, or copies of Iranian drones is going to change that.
    1
  50.  @Kriszjugg911 Neptune missiles my guy.
    1