Comments by "Diogo Jorge" (@DiogoJ1) on "'Putin Can Win The War': NATO nation's big admission; Poland pushes for more arms to Ukraine" video.

  1. He's a sinner.
    3
  2. No. Put the easterns ones as well.
    2
  3.  @thebookdoc.writing.and.editing  On that I can agree 100%. No invasions, means no war. No matter the reasons, invasion should never be condoned. The only time invasion can be justified, is as retaliation for another invasion, like Russia did to Nazi Germany in WW2.
    2
  4.  @user1qaz2wsx3edc  Exactly. That was years ago, and only now does Russia deign to attack them? Sounds like a big fat excuse and not a valid one at that. Also, it's none of their bussiness if they join NATO or not, that's for Ukraine to decide. If the USA were to invade Mexico, then USA would be wrong like Russia. Simple as that. Nothing can excuse invasion.
    2
  5. In your dreams. NATO would crush Russia. Russia would be cornered and be forced to use nukes, which would ensure their mutual destruction.
    1
  6.  @crisbolscrisbols9535  That's simple. Because NATO wasn't attacked. Russia would be crushed before being forced to use nukes if they ever dared to attack NATO.
    1
  7.  @crisbolscrisbols9535  It's not my imagination. That's what written in NATO's rules. They won't act unless NATO is attacked. There's nothing supreme about it. N Korea doesn't even have much of a military nowdays, it's their nukes that are the problem. Good think I know the truth then, since I don't base on mere movies. China wouldn't get involved, they already don't get involved with Ukraine, as they don't provide any soldiers, and neither did N Korea. USA alone could crush N Korea, together with other NATO members Russia and China would fight an pointless war that would only lead to massive casualties to their side even if they somehow won. It's a lose-lose situation for either side.
    1
  8. ​ @crisbolscrisbols9535  It doesn't matter if Russia is prepared or not. It's still right thing to do, to support Ukraine with whatever EU can spare. If it was actually NATO, with their better training, Russia would eventually be defeated until forced to use nukes. Russia is prepared to fight Ukranians, but not the full might of NATO.
    1
  9.  @user1qaz2wsx3edc  Nor could Russia for that matter. Reminder that Russia tried to invade Afghanistan. So, basically, proof that Russia is no better than NATO, which by the way was mostly just the USA, not even the full extent of their power, and thus Russia is very likely inferior.
    1
  10.  @crisbolscrisbols9535  Hardly. They have plenty where that came from. They are still giving even now. Do you honestly think a country like Ukraine wich is barely the size of 10% of NATO countries combined would exhaust ammo so easily? You are the one dreaming. Russia can only win through nukes. It doesn't need to be Iraq. Specially since it was mostly USA that was invading it. They only used a fraction of their strength then.
    1
  11.  @crisbolscrisbols9535  I am not dreaming though. The moment Russia would use nukes, NATO would lose, but so would Russia. It's a no win situation. Ever heard of M.A.D? And I'm the one dreaming, claiming that they can beat NATO whitout nukes. I bet you also believe in Santa Claus.
    1
  12.  @crisbolscrisbols9535  I'm no boy. You do sound like one though, acting all high and mighty about Russia. They aren't afraid. They can't act directly, because Ukraine isn't part of NATO. I already know all about that. They retreated, because they had already acomplished what they wanted, and because Trump the coward forced them to. Or are you talking about something else that isn't Afghanistan.
    1
  13.  @crisbolscrisbols9535  Exactly. Meaning they won't be used. It's not automatic to the point that it has no supervision. It will fire in response to usage of nukes. If Russia doesn't use them, then neither will USA. You don't get it? It's precisely because Putin isn't stupid that nukes won't be used. Rissia would only stand to lose.
    1
  14.  @MrSenthil98  Whoever invades first is to blame. And Russia invaded first.
    1
  15.  @MrSenthil98  Nobody forced Putin to do anything. He choose to invade, when he could have let it be. If it gets wiped off, it will be Russia's fault. May God have mercy on their sins.
    1
  16. Never trust words of easterns, then.
    1
  17. Straight to hell for their sins.
    1
  18. As If we want his "forgiveness" for doing the right thing. The forgiveness coming from a sinner is worthless and hypocritical.
    1
  19. What shame? EU did the right thing in supporting them.
    1
  20. That's fine. They only need to defend themselves until Russia leaves.
    1
  21.  @financeeconomics1057  I know all about that. And it doesn't matter. Invasion is always wrong. It doesn't matter what ethnicity they are either. They are citizens of Ukraine, not Russia. To Russia, where they belong.
    1
  22.  @user1qaz2wsx3edc  Centuries to many decades ago. And our ancestors were wrong to do so.
    1
  23. In your dreams. I won't take any Russian passports.
    1
  24. Then Russia should leave Ukraine. Ukraine is EU's ally, and thus we must support it.
    1
  25.  @andrewworth4810  Yeah. Unbelieavable indeed, considering NATO didn't exist 100 years ago.
    1
  26.  @muckle8  No it wasn't. Even if their propaganda was true, by invading Ukraine, all they accomplished is get even more people killed, than the ones they wanted to save. Most of those "ethnic Russians" were separatists. Either way. Invasion is wrong, unless Ukraine had invaded Russia first, which they never did.
    1
  27. Spoken like a religious zealot.
    1
  28. Invasion isn't something to look up to. All politicians are sinful, and Putin is no different.
    1
  29.  @HealzHS  It's an invasion. The government of Ukraine didn't give Russia permission to enter their territory. The people of Donbas shouldn't have rebelled and kidnapped and tortured pro-Ukranians, and Russia shouldn't have armed them.
    1
  30.  @patrickbennett2737  Why not? Russia doesn't seem to have a problem having nukes with wich he can fire upon Europe. Surely some measly missiles aren't a problem for the high and mighty Russia. You mean like Russia already does? I'm just fine with that. There are no nuclear missiles in Ukraine btw. If there were, chances were someone less sane would have used them by now.
    1
  31.  @yaelelerner3544  Correction, it was Ukranians killing separatists. Donbas own forces killed their own people in the crossfire. It doesn't matter what you call it. It's still invasion and still caused conflict. Guterres says otherwise, and he's the secretary general of UN.
    1
  32.  @yaelelerner3544 Afraid I do know. Doesn't matter what they were. Russian or Ukranians, if they are separatists, then they must be supressed. They wouldn't. That's Russian propaganda to make excuses to justify their invasion. Unfortunately for them. No invasion is ever justifiable even under those kind of circustances.
    1
  33.  @user1qaz2wsx3edc  I didn't invade anything... so...
    1
  34. That remains to be seen. Even if they do win, Russia will be a pariah to most of the world.
    1
  35.  @HealzHS  Sorry, but no. Only China and some african countries do so. If you count the number of countries that support Ukraine, they are in higher number than the Russian supporters. Just EU alone is around 20+ countries. Not that it particularly matters. Since even if most supported Russia, that would make most of the world wrong.
    1
  36.  @HealzHS  Wrong. Supporting Ukraine against Russian invasion and the separatists = good. Yes, it's bad. Since Russia's regime is worse. And Russia has yet to prove that Ukraine's regime is Nazi. As if. I support victims, not Nazis.
    1
  37.  @HealzHS  Putin exists. That's how. Never trusted him since he was in power. No, I'm in favour of the actual victims, the Ukranians who suffer war, due to Russia's invasion. I don't support any Nazis. So says the guy brainwashed by Russians. Unlike you, I did my research from both sides, and no matter how much I think about it, nothing ever changes the fact that invasion is wrong.
    1
  38.  @muckle8  Don't lie. Or inform yourself better, whichever is the case. You do realize that more than 10% population lives in Europe, and that more than 50% of the countries population support Ukraine? Not to mention that when it comes to support, it's the number of countries that matter, not the population. If a country is mostly in favour of Ukraine, that would make it one vote towards Ukraine's support. Otherwise, China would have the unfair advantage over all other countries. That makes it nowhere close to 90%. It doesn't matter if it's USA proxy war or not. Fact is, Russia did invade Ukraine, and that can't be condoned no matter what. I will never support invaders, no matter their reasons.
    1
  39.  @nigelkingston7698  There could be peace if Russia left Ukraine, but guess they don't care.
    1
  40.  @OurAmazingSkies  Simple. Because they expected Russia to eventually invade Ukraine. Because the people being bombed were separatists, whom rebelled and attacked Ukraine. I already know all about that. There's little I don't know on this matter, so I'm already educated. It doesn't matter who planned what. Russia has no justification to invade no matter their excuses. Invasion is wrong, unless Ukraine had invaded Russia first. Which wasn't the case. And that was their mistake. By preempting, assuming that was even the case, since Russia has no definitive proof of NATO planning to attack them, that would make them the invaders, and thus lose any moral ground. I already know the facts. Invasion is wrong, no matter the reasons. And Russia was the invader in this case.
    1
  41.  @harbhajandosanjh9856  By making unreasonable demands? Demilitarization, and the recognition of Donbas aren't reasonable demands.
    1
  42.  @andrewworth4810  It has been a thing since 2014. If it even calmed down in the meanwhile since then, then it only goes to show that Russia had even less reason to meddle.
    1
  43.  @Stillstanding24  Ukraine isn't their backyard. That would imply that Ukraine is their territory, which isn't. Ukraine is a neighboor, not a backyard.
    1
  44.  @muckle8  It wouldn't have happened, if Russia didn't invade. Exactly. Showing that Russia only made things worse.
    1
  45.  @Stillstanding24  I already paid more attention than I had to, to the nonsense some people spout around here. Afraid you are mistaken. Since Ukraine didn't invade Russia, thus not in their backyard. Whitout invasion, there's no proof that would be the case. I did. So tell me what part of history I forgot about, because nowhere in history says that Ukraine would invade Russia. Ukraine is it's own country, been so since 1991. History says so, hell, I lived that age.
    1
  46. Guerrila tactics are a thing.
    1
  47. EU is ally of Ukraine so... how exactly is this gaining nothing? They must their duty.
    1
  48.  @buddymacbuddington  That's fine by me. Bills can't steal your soul.
    1
  49.  @buddymacbuddington  It makes perfect sense to me. It doesn't matter what your bills are, as long you do the right thing. Spirituality over material possessions.
    1
  50.  @buddymacbuddington  As if that matters now. You do realize people from those ages are long dead, don't you? Generations change and thus nations change. Also, Germany isn't the whole Europe. Nazi Germany and Italy were the only truely evil nations in the recent past. And once again, there's barely a single soul alive from that age. Germany of now, isn't the Germany of then.
    1