Comments by "Diogo Jorge" (@DiogoJ1) on "Russia Breathes Fire As Ukraine 'Bombs' Crimean Bridge; Putin Terminates Black Sea Grain Deal" video.

And? We have the right to support Ukraine, and thus have the right to that grain. Putin should never have invaded Ukraine.
17
You mean as long Russia doesn't leave Ukraine alone. Russia should leave, and war will end. Ukraine is the victim and should be supported.
5
What you are talking about? Anyone else would have the basic understanding that this war isn't worth sacrificing the world over.
5
@pmp2559 That promise was to USRR and is 30 years old. No longer valid after so long. It wasn't written in paper, thus even less valid.
4
@NightmareNews69 Ukraine didn't join NATO. And Ukraine has the right to make the decision of joining or not.
4
Comes around for what? Supporting Ukraine is the right thing.
3
@miked4122 Pretty much. There is no reason why those people should be there in the first place.
3
@bondgabebond4907 Donbas shouldn't have rebelled and caused a civil war in the first place. They deserve no sympathy for their sins.
3
@@Hez_Goldberger Loling doesn't change the fact that I'm right.
2
@arundavid8231 Russia started it, so they could end it by leaving.
2
Then humanity is doomed.
2
@nationlab1 The bridge is a military building, meaning its a valid target. Only a fool would go there during time of war. And a illegal referendum at that, since Russia isnt an impartial party to supervise it.
2
And thus show their weakness. Using nukes at all, would be admittance they can't defeat Ukraine whitout nukes.
2
@niburu1508 Emojis, the resort of those who are either feeble minded, have no counterargument or are trolls, or both.
2
@niburu1508 I will given the chance. Indeed I have. Please, I have more education than most plebs around here, and know what I stand for. You mean 2014, a pity your education doesn't seem to be able to make you see obvious typos. As they should have interfered, the majority of the Ukranian people wanted Viktor out of the government.
2
@arundavid8231 I don't care what happens to him.
2
Keep dreaming.
1
@arundavid8231 We will just have to do what is necessary and take the grain anyway, and F what Putin thinks on the matter. He can either cooperate or get out of our way.
1
@arundavid8231 And? Putin is to blame for invading Ukraine, and thus any actions he takes are just an extension of that blame.
1
@Jozef-g6m I ignore people who don't speak english or portuguese, so don't bother quoting me, if you can't do that.
1
@arundavid8231 Then do so, we don't need you. I don't want your kind of "real world leader" support. No world should have a world leader.
1
@arundavid8231 Lol. Afraid of you? I don't even know you. I just don't want to share this part of the world with people like you who lick Putin's boots. If you want to go to Russia, then go, you are just a waste of resources in other people's lands.
1
@arundavid8231 We don't need any world leaders. Each country should have their own, no single person should ever have control over the whole world.
1
@arundavid8231 You mean fabricated evidence.
1
@arundavid8231 Nor should change. I'm the person I should and want to be. Your english is barely readable, can't understand half of what you are saying. I will insult those who clearly show hostile intent and approve of this invasion, as I have the right of it. You a journalist? Who do you think you are fooling with that bad english of yours? If you are a journalist, then that makes whatever agency you work for, a 2nd rate agency at best, as journalists are expected to have good english due to being the most used language. Considering India's news are full of bias, not suprised if you were one of those from garbage like Firstpost, Hindustan or TFI. I don't want you to protect me. I want Ukraine to be supported.
1
@andresdeks The Minsk agreements didn't say anything of the sort, not directly anyway. Also, they were broken before Ukraine asked to join, making it pointless.
1
@p.h.m.kletersteeg117 So basically, you would condemn many innocents to death just because a few died? Good thing you aren't a leader. You would be a loose cannon.
1
@p.h.m.kletersteeg117 I doubt it. Just a reminder that if you do use nukes, the war might end, but so would you and the very country you are supposed to protect.
1
That's war. There are always civilians caught in the crossfire. Those people shouldn't have even been there during war time, as the Crimea bridge is a valid target.
1
@mamushfikire9166 There can be no peace until Russia leaves. If weapons aren't supplied, Ukraine won't be able to defend itself against invaders.
1
@niburu1508 I know better than you, so... what does that say about you? Good thing I'm neither. I should take your advice. People of your caliber aren't even worth the dirt my shoes step on.
1
@spartanpb4442 They didn't though. All Biden did was claim that Russia needed a regime change, but never did anything about it.
1
@NightmareNews69 Thats what Russia claims. Whitout invasion, Russia cant prove it. Russia has no right to invade other countries, unless they attack first. Makes no difference, China would have no right to invade Taiwan.
1
@alrent2992 Both USA and Russia has warmongers.
1
@JJ-3033 And so would be Russia by that logic. Putin isn't the only person smart enough to not use nukes. Someone else in power would know better than put Russia at risk.
1
Typical barbarian strategy. Imoral and callous. But as I said, they would have to be stupid to use nukes.
1
@garychesser5277 Putin is the one to blame, so...
1