General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Diogo Jorge
Johnny Harris
comments
Comments by "Diogo Jorge" (@DiogoJ1) on "Putin Will Lose, Here's Why" video.
@pakusssoohmnpe6646 What's so wrong about joining NATO? Russia was been a threat for ages. Joining NATO allows them to gain military support from other countries to defend their nation. NATO or no NATO, Russia would just find another excuse to invade.
22
@sarfarazhussain1143 Ukraine is no threat though. NATO isn't a knife, but a shield. If someone tried to sleep with a shield in their room, would that be so wrong?
9
@lincolnpinkoln359 Whatever geopolitics say, Russia or better said, Putin, threw the first stone, thus they are the invading party and thus, they are the ones that are the most in the wrong.
5
@simoncoope9653 A civil war that could have been avoided if Russia hadn't recognized Donbass. Either way, no matter the skeletons in Ukraine's closet, fact is, Russia has no right to invade.
4
@hatchman1640 It puts Putin in the wrong at least, since he started the current war. It doesn't matter what ethnicity they are, Ukraine is it's own country, so Russia has no bussiness butting in.
3
@milosstojanovic4623 Zelensky has no obligation to resign. Also, it's Ukraine that approached NATO, not NATO approaching Ukraine to consider having them join.
3
@hatchman1640 Yes, wrongs have been done by those countries, but how does that change the fact that Putin is at fault here?
2
Tim Dawson No we didn't? If Russia behaved itself, then we would have reason to welcome them as allies, rather than eye them as suspicious. Really, I say Russia, but is really mostly Putin.
2
@milosstojanovic4623 His obligation is to defend Ukraine's interests. Resigning in this situation would be inexcusable and a coward's move. As they should. Eastern politics are pretty bad. There are hardly any decent rulers in either Russia, China, North Korea and the like. NATO so far always stood for defending other countries, and so far I have no real complaints that don't apply to other organizations.
2
Tim Dawson The western world of course. It's not my decision, but it's what would allow Russia to actually be taken serious and respected. No chance of that happening with Putin at the reins. Afraid you don't know anything about my home to know if I make any decisions or not. I made plenty of decisions, which my family followed on.
2
Tim Dawson As he deserves, if they can even bring him to a tribunal. Complex or not, the only thing that matters is for the war to end as soon as possible and for Putin to be held account and punished severely. Lol, what's so whiny about what I said? And what's wrong with that? It's not like I'm the one cooking, so why wouldn't my wife ask me such a natural question?
2
@bobali962 Sounds like a case of pettiness. You can hate Israel all you want, but Ukraine isn't at fault for Palestine's troubles.
2
@oneday4227 That's ancient history. We don't blame people for something that happened generations ago. Just like USA shouldn't blame current Japan for Pearl Harbour.
1
@agnieszkaolszewska6079 Current generation? I doubt it. Specially since they don't seem to have a problem with taking refuge on Poland.
1
@sini81rs Would you blame the grandsons for the sins of their grandfathers?
1
@alek6208 I am not american, but I will take your "fake" democracy over what Putin is selling.
1
@Ryanlexz NATO didn't attack though.
1
@simoncoope9653 If they really wanted peace, then invading would never be an option even as a last resort.
1
@mr.hgorgan1812 Well said. Until then, Ukraine will have to hold their ground.
1
@hatchman1640 Donbas shouldn't have been recognized by Russia, so it's both Ukraine's and Russia's fault. Either way, no matter what skeletons Ukraine has in it's closet, Putin is the enemy here and that innocent ukranians are being affected by this pointless war Putin started. As long that is the case, everything else is secondary.
1
@hatchman1640 He started it. US didn't whisper Putin to invade Ukraine, that was Putin's decision. What proper government? The one before Zalensky was responsible for the shellings in Donbass. If Putin didn't want war he would have stayed put. That's no good reason to start an ivasion. Are they really illegal though? Biolabs exist everywhere to research medicine. And even if they are, that doesn't justify an ivasion, nothing save self defense justifies an invasion, and this is clearly not self-defence, since Ukraine didn't attack Russia, Russia attacked Ukraine instead, meaning that Ukraine has the right to defend itself, and that Putin must answer for starting this war.
1
@hatchman1640 It's not a lie if I don't intend to deceive. No, but from what you were saying, you seemed to imply that's illegal for biolabs to exist. You didn't say anything about them being biolab weapons as far as I recall. Also, what proof do you have that those weapons are meant to be used against Russia or even that they exist in the first place? And how does that justify Putin attacking first even if they were?
1
@dcar6530 That would be nice, but unfortunately, there aren't enough people protesting against him.
1
@AspireGMD As they should. It won't end well for the world if USA and Russia clash.
1
@johnsauder2721 Must? How can one be so sure they will? Russia can barely stand with all the sanctions.
1
Well, I think religion can be a good thing, but it doesn't justify starting a war to fix that issue. Trust me, the lack of religion doesn't compare to the real problem should Russia suceed.
1
Yeah, but he might not live to face it. He's not exactly a spring chicken.
1
I understand that Putin is the true culprit. But what kind of support can one give to an hostile country? It's not like we can just waltz in Russia even if we had the money for that kind of journey. The only support we can give, is moral support, little as it is, that's all we can give. If Russian people don't stand on their feet against this man, then they will continue to suffer until he dies.
1
@lennartvangensinnerud7923 Not all soldiers killed civilians. If they did, the number of civilian casualties would be monstrous by now.
1
@bobali962 Because neither side tries to make diplomacy talks. It's both sides fault. And that's still not Ukraine's problem.
1
No, what America should be saying is, that whatever Ukraine joins NATO is for Ukraine and NATO to decide and nobody else.
1
@adityabarua1702 Russia started it. So I'm blaming Putin more than I would USA. USA shouldn't have done that, but they didn't start hostilities, thus they are the least wrong of the two parties. Also Ukraine isn't at fault for either countries mistakes. There's also no justification for invasion, no matter how well or ill intended one may be. On top of that, there's also no justification for Russia going around killing civilians when they were using humanitarian corridors.
1
@adityabarua1702 Ukranian civilians were killed with Russia ignoring the cease-fire they are supposed to upheld for those cases. Russia shelled Mariupol.
1