Comments by "Diogo Jorge" (@DiogoJ1) on "Sky News" channel.

  1. Paranoia at it's finest, no doubt.
    8
  2.  @dariomladenovski6481  I'm better off in my country than in Russia.
    4
  3. Nor should be heeded. He has no right to complain.
    4
  4.  @danielwebb8402  Considering the alternative. Macron was the only valid choice.
    3
  5. Ukraine is a sovereign country and has the right to it's territory.
    3
  6.  @Soap010  Only if used, and Putin has no good reason to use them.
    2
  7.  @TheDisinformationProjectNz  Imagine thinking that Russia is any different from USA. Time to smell the coffe, Russia is just another USA.
    2
  8. Precisely. Invasion is wrong, no matter the reason. USA had no right to invade Cuba, and neither does Russia has the right to invade Ukraine.
    2
  9.  @swtmelody416  No he wasn't. Ghost of Kyiv's body was found after he died in battle.
    2
  10.  @Box545x39  Lol, I'm not american, so "our" is wrong. Also, it doesn't matter. USA would have been in the wrong if they did invade back then. USA had no right to complain about Cuba.
    2
  11.  @frozenllama23  But until that happens, it is indeed peaceful.
    2
  12.  @frozenllama23  Same here.
    2
  13. More like Putinphobia, and well deserved. Putin did a big mistake.
    2
  14.  @GegeDxD  Actually, the distance between Kiyv and Moscow is 800 Km. That's the current meaningless war.
    2
  15. And why should we care? He has nukes. It comes off as hypocritical.
    1
  16.  @Soap010  Proof that the world will end?
    1
  17.  @Soap010  Putin isn't stupid to use them. He's evil, but not stupid. If he uses nukes, Russia is finished. It's more likely for USA to use nukes then Russia is, if the ones pulling Biden's strings are as insane as people claim. So I say, poke away, because Russia won't fire them and it needs to leave Ukraine alone. Boas.
    1
  18. So, Putin. Got it. No invasion, no war.
    1
  19.  @coderentity2079  That's fine. It's all worth it to oppose Russia.
    1
  20. Easier said than done, but I do hope that could be made reality.
    1
  21. It would be nice if they could. Hopefully, Ukraine will cause enough casualties for Russia to consider it not worth it.
    1
  22.  @valenrn8657  Japan would have surrendered eventually. Nukes were uneeded and should have never been used.
    1
  23. No he doesn't. Invading another country, save as retaliation against invasion, is wrong, no matter the reason.
    1
  24.  @dyshweb1947  Indeed they shouldn't have. But that doesn't excuse Russia's actions.
    1
  25.  @tkeo12  And yet, as a portuguese, I think we are better off than being a slave to Putin.
    1
  26.  @dariomladenovski6481  Nobody. Just saying that if we are going to insult my country, Russia deserves those insults more.
    1
  27.  @limiaa744  His country wasn't attacked though... So what exactly is he protecting?
    1
  28.  @roddeazevedo  Coitadinho. Têm de recorrer a insultos em vez de dizer algo de valor. Patético.
    1
  29.  @roddeazevedo  Ah, okay. Então não só és patético, também és ignorante. Coitado, pensa que me conhece.
    1
  30. Ukraine has the right to their nation. So not happening. Russia will be forced to leave Ukraine, or face guerrila groups in the future biting at their heels at every chance.
    1
  31. I'm ready at least. I hope there's some truth to the Message of Fatima, and that it's possible to convert Russia and stop their madness.
    1
  32.  @kgr3977  Both are though. It just happens that Putin is a bigger one.
    1
  33. He is though, no matter what others think.
    1
  34. How? Russia is almost unstoppable.
    1
  35.  @janurbanovic67  Here's hoping that happens.
    1
  36.  Red Bull  True. No wonder there's so much anti-Ukranian nonsense. Those who are on the side of Russia will have an easier time making their stories.
    1
  37.  Red Bull  Thanks for this new perspective. It is something that Russia would definetely do given the chance.
    1
  38.  @clearcut6818  If it doesn't kill, then it's not a proper weapon.
    1
  39.  @nic5613  Except it wasn't supposed. NATO never said they would dissolve. NATO was created to counter USRR, but that's not the only threat.
    1
  40. Last I checked the "Porsch" is outside Russian territory, and I fail to see how is that an issue, when they have nukes they can turn on any country in Europe.
    1
  41. One in a million of filth.
    1
  42. No. It will be forever be in Russia's hands. They started it. Anything else is an indirect result.
    1
  43. Would be nice, but they just lack the power to do so.
    1
  44.  @dr.anthonyfauci6953  Then they should have headed to Russia instead of stealing Crimea.
    1
  45.  @mensrea1251  Nor should matter. His words sound hypocritical to me.
    1
  46.  @ЮлияКимберг  It's the one that keeps balls from entering. If the defense is impenetrable, then one can't lose. So an invincible goalkeeper is preferable over an unstoppable foward.
    1
  47. God doesn't send filth.
    1
  48.  @tonywilliams7152  Would sellout France to Putin.
    1
  49.  @tonywilliams7152  Kneeling to Putin isn't saving, it's choosing the coward's way.
    1
  50.  @johnrhodes3350  They aren't his people anymore and they don't deserve to be protected after what they did, and cause current mess. Anything outside of Russian territory is not theirs.
    1