Comments by "Diogo Jorge" (@DiogoJ1) on "Top US General Tells Ukraine it Cannot Win War Against Russia Militarily | Russia Ukraine War" video.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@assouankoffi9456 There is though. NATO wouldn't invade Russia. Russia has nukes, it would be stupid to attempt to do so.
Not unpredictable enough to know that an invasion of Russia would make no sense. And by that logic of yours, I shouldn't trust your word, because you are an unpredictable human being, and thus, as far as I'm concerned, you could be anything, from someone trying to manipulate me to their side, or someone even worse.
If you are willing to hurt people, because they might be a threat, then that's what paranoia is. If I were to think like that, I would have to harm at least hundreds of people, because they might pose a threat in the future. An pretty cold hearted logic that leads to uneeded tragedy. Nobody knows the future, so one should let the future play out as normal.
If you don't act right now, then at least you will know that you didn't act in haste and get people pointlessly harmed.
That's easy, NATO is encircling Russia, to prevent it from invading other nations.
Afraid not. Unlike Russia, NATO wouldn't invade Russia because Russia might be a threat. NATO would encircle Russia to prevent it from invading other nations. So if Russia has a problem with that, that means that Russia wants the freedom to invade other nations and thus end up justifying NATO's actions by default.
NATO doesn't rule the world. Nobody does.
It doesn't matter what USA allows or doesn't allow. If USA invaded Mexico over a mere base, then USA would be in the wrong for doing so.
You are right, I'm 35 years old and I already know virtually everything on the matter of right and wrong, good and evil.
1
-
@assouankoffi9456 Then why so agressive about it?
Yes, a coup which I approve off, since most of Ukraine desired to have Viktor ousted. Only the east part of Ukraine opposed it.
Exactly, and the Minsk agreements went ignored, as they should.
Yes, around 14k. 10k were separatists, 4k were civilians killed by both sides as a result of collateral damage.
Simple, because Donbas separatists didn't respect their side of the accord, worse, they were armed by Russia, thus Ukraine should be armed to protect themselves against both.
But they have nuclear weapons, always have for a long time, so that point is moot.
It invaded Afeghanistan and Georgia. Not because of delight, but because of their own interests. No one is accusing Russia for invading countries for fun. Russia has an agenda when it invades a country.
Yeah, which is mostly USA's fault. Ghadaffi's death was deserved though. He was scum.
It doesn't matter what they foresee or don't foresee. They have no right to invade over mere predictions. Just like you said before, humanity is unpredictable, thus one shouldn't act in a way that only causes more chaos.
It's not irrelevant. Russia having nuclear weapons, means that Russia was never at risk and that their "security concerns" are bogus.
No, he promised to end war in Donbas. Which would, if the separatists were driven out and Russia hadn't interefered.
Russia's invasion could be prevented if Putin had not decided to invade it. Russia has no valid reason to invade Ukraine. All reasons presented so far in no way justify it.
1
-
1
-
1