Comments by "PNH 6000" (@PNH-sf4jz) on "Bakhmut COUNTER OFFENSIVE BEGINS. Ukrainians OBLITERATED the ENTIRE TANK COMPANY of Russians" video.

  1. Creo que José Méndez dice con humor, aunque José piensa en sí mismo como feo, que al ver a los pilotos que destruyeron el dron, José está tranquilizado de que no es tan feo como ellos. Espero haberte entendido correctamente, José. I believe that José Méndez is saying, although he thinks of himself as ugly, that having seen the pilots that destroyed the drone, he is reassured that he is not as ugly as they are. I hope that I have understood you correctly, José.
    2
  2. Sher Moore, I'll respond to your comment since, if any credit accrues, it will be to you. Some people make comments like "He'd be full of shite." by"StillCant BeSilenced". It is conjecture on my part that the writer must be speaking with knowledge acquired through their qualifications in nuclear physics. Or not !!!
    1
  3. The Ukrainians are mounting a counter-offensive against the Russian offensive. So the Dude's use of the combination, "counter-offensive" is correct. That is, unless you consider Lavrov's assertion that Ukraine attacked Russia is correct. I recall that he made that assertion on a public stage and there was not just a giggle and snigger, but outright laughter at the preposterousness of his assertion.
    1
  4. With what qualifications are you asserting your belief. If you cannot, by your own qualifications, then maybe you can provide a reference to a reputable source or sources by which the assertion you have made can be verified.
    1
  5. 🤣bot alert🤣
    1
  6. Uh huh !!!!
    1
  7.  @JoseMendez-yf7kb  Gracias por su respuesta, mis mejores deseos, PNH
    1
  8. You "_Laboratorija" , being a qualified nuclear physicist, will be able to give us the full, complete and accurate information, is that right ?
    1
  9. Every square inch of Ukraine is important. While it may only have significance to Russia as a "feat accomplished", if they can take Bakhmut, in part, that is why it is significant to Ukraine. While the Ukrainians have defensible positions in Bakhmut, why pull back and allow the Russians a psychological advantage. You may respond by saying "to save troops". However, that is unlikely to be true, since troops will be lost in the withdrawal and, fighting from a less defensive position, a higher proportion of troops may be lost.
    1
  10. "Michael Smith's" comment is a prime example of "Ignorance is bliss".
    1