Comments by "PNH 6000" (@PNH-sf4jz) on "A new stage of Russian hybrid warfare" video.

  1. Total fantasy, and an absolute reversal and projection of the actual events during that time.
    3
  2.  @Princip666  Specific sources and references?
    2
  3. Except that the NATO Defensive Alliance is, as it's name states, defensive in nature, function and action. NATO, by its charter, cannot act in a belligerent fashion. If NATO acted in that fashion, such action would undermine the whole intent of its function and reason for its existence. The Alliance would be acting in a fashion, just as Putin incorrectly claims, as a military threat to Russia. Any such action would then be justification for Russia to further escalate their actions against and response to military actions initiated by any member country of the NATO Defensive Alliance, or the Alliance as a whole. Consequently, as frustrating as it may be, NATO can only respond to belligerent provocation, whether by Russia or any other country. NATO cannot act as the provocateur. If the Alliance acted in such a manner, it would be putting itself and its members in exactly the same position as that for which Russia is justifiably condemned.
    1
  4. Even if real time surveillance of the seas can be undertaken, it is unlikely to be able to identify a ship that is deliberately dragging its anchor over the seabed. It is only after the effect of such an occurrence has been identified that the location and time of the event can be correlated with the effect - the damage to an undersea cable.
    1
  5. What about it? It seems that Russia is as likely to have perpetrated that act of sabotage as it is the more recent acts of deliberate vandalism in the damage to undersea cables.
    1