Comments by "PNH 6000" (@PNH-sf4jz) on "Grain deal stand-off shows Russia's maritime weakness" video.

@mariaf.6601 Absolutely agreed and supported. The comment offered above, by Helgardt Muller, was cynical and flawed in all respects. Unashamedly supportive of: 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 VICTORY for UKRAINE 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
5
Logical and informed reasoning.
4
I don't think that making fun of Russia, learning lessons from the exercise or support for Ukraine are in conflict with the continuation of the grain corridor deal.
3
@mariaf.6601 Absolutely supported and agreed. The argument offered was at best cynical and certainly flawed in all respects. It seems to me that "Helgardt Muller" is ill-informed and a pro-RuZZian bot, troll, shill, sympathiser, supporter, or at least four of the five. Unashamedly supporting: 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 VICTORY for UKRAINE 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
3
Here is a little Poetic Justice, from Shakespeare jazzochannel states: "Lot's of sheep in comments agreeing and praising the "popular opinion". This man just dumped a bunch of statements on you without backing them up in any way. for example 2:35, 3:39, 4:00, 4:13" Hoist with his own petard From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoist_with_his_own_petard A petard from a 17th-century manuscript of military designs "Hoist with his own petard" is a phrase from a speech in William Shakespeare's play Hamlet that has become proverbial. The phrase's meaning is that a bomb-maker is blown ("hoist") off the ground by his own bomb (a "petard" is a small explosive device), and indicates an ironic reversal, or poetic justice.[1] The phrase occurs in a central speech in the play in which Hamlet has discovered a plot on his life by Claudius and resolves to respond to it by letting the plotter be "Hoist with his own petard". Although the now-proverbial phrase is the best known part of the speech, it and the later sea voyage and pirate attack are central to critical arguments regarding the play. 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 VICTORY for UKRAINE 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
3
Absolutely, agreed and supported. 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🙏🙏🙏🙏🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 ******** Slava Ukraine! *******
2
@danwylie-sears1134 I think that the recent turn of events has simply emphasised that it would only be Russia that would be imposing the barrier. Before the blockade was to prevent access to the Ukrainian seaports, which may have been assumed as a legitimate activity in wartime. However, since Russia had accesded to the opening of the grain shipment corridor, it was no longer perceived as acceptable for RuZZia to re-impose the blockade. Their may also have been other forces (non-military) at play; China, Egypt and others. RuZZia may also have caused a problem for themselves, since they were complaining that they could not ship out their fertilizer and grains. The problem of shipping Russia's fertilizer and grains, may thus have been precipitated by the RuZZians themselves. In the event that the RuZZians resumed their participation in the agreement with Ukraine, Turkey and the UN, other ships would again feel safe entering and sailing across the black Sea. The shippers did not want to come into the Black Sea ports to ship RuZZia's grain and fertilizer because of the high risks associated with sailing that Sea. https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/10/31/world/russia-ukraine-war-news "After suspending its participation in a grain deal brokered by Turkey and the U.N., Moscow said it wouldn’t guarantee security for any cargo vessels crossing the Black Sea." Unfortunately, Russia "cut off its nose to viciously punish its face." 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 VICTORY for UKRAINE 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
2
I wouldn't tempt them. You may be sorry tomorrow if you hear of something like that happening. 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 VICTORY for UKRAINE 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
1
I thought that what you have observed is the only reason that the RuZZians actually wanted to recommence/re-engage their "oversight" of the grain deal. That being that they may, in effect, be excluded from the process and the conditions that favour them, that are attached to the deal. 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 VICTORY for UKRAINE 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
1