Comments by "PNH 6000" (@PNH-sf4jz) on "Russia Admits it Has No Allies and is Struggling" video.

  1. Are you sayng that "NATO is scared of Putin" of "NATO scares off Putin" ? They are two different possibiities and really the opposite of each other. If you are saying the latter, then I agree with you. If you are saying the first possibility, then I disagree with you.
    2
  2.  @sannamelo5934  🇺🇦 👍 🇺🇦
    1
  3. I don't recall anyone joking about cheap Iranian drones, in particular their effects. Neither do I hear anyone laughing about North Korean artillery shells. There may be some people who would be concerned that they may need some preparation before being fired, but that is more a safety issue for the Russian "artillerists". Heaven help them !!! It sounds to me that you are being somewhat oversensitive on behalf of Ukraine. I believe that the Ukrainians, themselves, would also be amused about Russia being so desperate for ammunition that they need to purchase back artillery shells that Russia sold to North Korea about 45 years ago. The same applies to the bringing out of storage 75 year old tanks. Sure, the tanks can still fire shells that can kill, but it is not the tanks that people are laughing at, but their age and the fact that the Russians are resorting to using such aged hardware. There has to be some humour, especially in the depths of WAR as waged by Russia against Ukraine. Grumpy-bums most certainly will not help Ukraine either.
    1
  4. Hello #yamisa8059 I hope that the following information may be supportive and reassuring to you and to others also. 🇧🇾 🇺🇦 🇰🇿 Jake Broe was not saying that he believes that Belarus is not a country in its own right. He was paraphrasing the comment by Margarita Simonyan. Simonyan is an exceptionally vocal spokesperson for the Russian political and military establishment, for Putin and the Kremlin. I believe that Jake Broe and I, with millions of others, share a distinct dislike for Simonyan and many others in her media group and occupation. 🇧🇾 🇺🇦 🇰🇿 Portion of Simonyan's statement was, "...... it is the first war in our history, in which we have no allies at all ...." at about min 15:30 The corollary or extention of her statement, despite the support that Lukashenko has given to the Russians, is that the Russians do not see Belarus as a country, in its own right. 🇧🇾 🇺🇦 🇰🇿 What is the myth? "Myth 11: ‘The peoples of Ukraine, Belarus and Russia are one nation’ " https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/05/myths-and-misconceptions-debate-russia/myth-11-peoples-ukraine-belarus-and-russia-are-one "The claim that the peoples of Ukraine and Belarus are sub-nations of a single community known as the ‘triune’ or all-Russian nation (триединый/общерусский народ) is an ideological construct dating back to imperial times. It builds on the idea that a pan-Russian nation with roots in the medieval Kievan Rus’, the cradle of Orthodox Christianity for Eastern Slavs, developed and flourished from the 14th century onwards around the principality of Muscovy. The problem with attributing an exclusive Kievan inheritance to the Muscovite princes – and thus giving credence to what is a founding myth of Russian statehood to this day – is that it distorts history and is used for justifying Russia’s current irredentist ambitions towards its western neighbours." 🇧🇾 🇺🇦 🇰🇿 BY ANDREI BABITSKY https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/ukraine-not-russia-neither-belarus "Ukraine is not Russia, and neither is Belarus. Before Russia invaded Ukraine in February, I thought it was obvious and not in need of further examination. It didn't strike me that a person who disagreed with this simple observation and who had an army at his disposal would be willing to bet thousands of lives and the future of his own country just to prove himself right. But failing to proclaim this simple truth—Ukraine is not Russia, and neither is Belarus—loudly, publicly, and often turned out to the wrong decision, and I regret my personal lacking in this respect. If many like me had broadcast it daily, it might have helped avoid this insane war. "I’m not going to talk about Ukraine, as Ukrainians are every day proving their separate, independent existence beyond a reasonable doubt. "But Belarus is another matter. Many people in Russia, in the United States, and in Europe still treat Belarus and Russia as if they were one and the same. And for many refugees from Belarus who fled to Ukraine during the last couple of years, this confusion is not only unfair but dangerous, as they are not considered among the “usual” refugees, who are granted protected status. "So let me elaborate, as the political struggles of Belarus have important moral and political consequences. 🇧🇾 🇺🇦 🇰🇿 The same applies to Ukraine and Kazakhstan. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazakh_Khanate "In 2013, President Vladimir Putin raised controversy when he claimed that “Kazakhs had never had statehood”, in what seemed to be an apparent response to growing nationalism among Kazakhstanis. Putin's remarks on the matter led to a severe response from President Nazarbayev, who announced that the country would celebrate the 550th anniversary of the Kazakh Khanate, which effectively refutes Putin's claim that a Kazakh nation has never existed. He also threatened to withdraw from the Eurasian Economic Union, saying that the independence of the country is his "most precious treasure" and that Kazakhs "will never surrender" their independence. "In December 2020, Putin's derogatory comments were repeated by at least two Russian lawmakers. 🇧🇾 🇺🇦 🇰🇿
    1
  5. That's all you know !!! And that is all you need to know !!!
    1
  6.  @sirvozelo1  If it doesn't matter much to you, why make any comment at all ? To my way of thinking the Ukrainians are doing what I would do - that is defend my country against all invaders and push them out. To accomplish that goal, I would destroy as much of the resources, hardware and equipment of the enemy as possible. And I would move very little until I believed that they I had signifantly diminished their resources and the enemy had exhausted all their resources, and then I would move forward, not before.
    1
  7. Hello #avinashm6049 I hope that the following information may be supportive and reassuring to you and to others also. 🇧🇾 🇺🇦 🇰🇿 Jake Broe was not saying that he believes that Belarus is not a country in its own right. He was paraphrasing the comment by Margarita Simonyan. Simonyan is an exceptionally vocal spokesperson for the Russian political and military establishment, for Putin and the Kremlin. I believe that Jake Broe and I, with millions of others, share a distinct dislike for Simonyan and many others in her media group and occupation. 🇧🇾 🇺🇦 🇰🇿 Portion of Simonyan's statement was, "...... it is the first war in our history, in which we have no allies at all ...." at about min 15:30 The corollary or extention of her statement, despite the support that Lukashenko has given to the Russians, is that the Russians do not see Belarus as a country, in its own right. 🇧🇾 🇺🇦 🇰🇿 What is the myth? "Myth 11: ‘The peoples of Ukraine, Belarus and Russia are one nation’ " https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/05/myths-and-misconceptions-debate-russia/myth-11-peoples-ukraine-belarus-and-russia-are-one
    1
  8. I have supported your comment on the basis that I believe that you are referring to Putin and the rest of the Russian political and military establishment.
    1
  9. That could be a convenient way of avoiding the necessity of accusing Russia and thus, the possible requirement to invoke Article 5.
    1
  10. I do not think that your concerns are warranted. Russia is making certain that popular support in the West, if not increasing at the rate that it has been, is certainly not diminishing. A stray drone, landing in the wrong place {or was it deliberate ?} is not going to alter perceptions in the Free World by any significant degree. However, acknowledging a misplaced drone that has not caused casualties or any material damage, may cause significant harm and an expectation that Article 5 should be invoked. It is unlikely that acknowledgement of the location of the misplaced drone could be separated from the invocation of Article 5. It may just be, that doing so would possibly be what Russia may want. They could then claim that counties of the NATO Defensive Alliance were attacking them with "infounded provocation, over an 'accidental' stray drone". Neither do I believe that there is a significant danger of political change in the Free World that will lead to diminished support for Ukraine. If anything, the opposite affect may occur; that the WAR, waged by Russia against Ukraine, while not determining the outcome of any election, may be an influencing factor in the outcome of any elections. When it is all said and done, it is the "peoples' choice" in the Free World and we need to take that into account also. 🇺🇦 Victory for Ukraine 🇺🇦
    1