Comments by "PNH 6000" (@PNH-sf4jz) on "Everything Inside of Russia is Failing" video.

  1. Yes, agreed, it certainly appears that way. I have tried to delete scammers where possible, however, it becomes a very time connsuming exercise. What's worse, as you say, is that many of the bots, shills, trolls seem to get an almost free ride.
    1
  2. Yes !!! Unless I am mistaken, the fellow was referring to the local Ukrainians as traitors when they acted in a way that countered the Russian invasion, or conducted activities against the Russians. How thick would they have to be not to realise that they are the invaders, they are supporting the Terror-Russian insurgency, they are the ones who are effectively inciting insurrection in a neighbouring country. 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 VICTORY for UKRAINE 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 REAL PEACE, NOT APPEASEMENT 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
    1
  3. The question is raised about how you define traiterous activity, or is it partisan activity, in support of your own country. I believe that this fellow incorrectly identified those civilians, acting in defense of their country, as "traitors". To my way of thinking and, I hope, that of many others, the activity of such people is correctly recognised as partisan activity in defense of their HOMELAND, not Russia's or Russians'. It is Terror-Russia that attacked, invaded and incited many of the people to insurrection against the Ukrainian government. That insurrection was generated by the same activities, lies, falsehoods and pressures that we see exhibited in the YouTube comments. I have no doubt that many of the people, in Crimea and the Donbas regions, who were subject to that pressure by the Terror-Russians, since 2013-14, have since realised that the Terror-Russians are definitely not supporting the interests of the Ukrainian population, whether they speak the Russian or Ukrainian language. Hence the reason that, "not 50%, but 70%" of the population, in the illegally occupied territory, are opposed to the Terror-Russian occupation and are fighting against it. And chances are that the "70%" is actually a conservative estimate of the percenntage of people opposed, given that the figure was presented by a Russian fellow, who falsely considers partisans to be traitors. In some ways, the Russian fellow and his wife have shown at least some level of empathy, responsiveness and consideration, to the wishes of the local population, by speaking of their experience and observations. On that issue, they have earned at least some recognition for that empathy. I could say that his wife looked angry, but I'd rather believe that she was disappointed and disalllusioned by the difference between what she/they had been told in Russia and the reality that they faced in Ukraine. However, the misstating of activities as traitorous, as distinct from partisan, still identifies them as holding a Russia-centric view of their position and status in Ukraine.
    1
  4.  @ufsman  Thank you for your reply.
    1
  5. On March 30, 1867, the United States reached an agreement to purchase Alaska from Russia for a price of $7.2 million. The Treaty with Russia was negotiated and signed by Secretary of State William Seward and Russian Minister to the United States Edouard de Stoeckl. The Terror-Russians are using all the excuses under the sun to lay claim to countries and territory that they have previously occupied. Alaska is just one of those territories. They may even claim that the negotiation and agreement was illegal and invalid, as they have done with other treaties, agreements and memoranda. Or they may simply ignore any established protocols that they consider are not in their interests, as they have also done elsewhere.
    1
  6. Unfortunately, it certainly appears that way, It raises the question, given the ludicrous and unbelievable reasons that the Terror-Russian political and military establishment have given for this WAR that Terror-Russia has waged against Ukraine, what do they really want to get out of it. What is a "win" for Terror-Russia.
    1