Comments by "PNH 6000" (@PNH-sf4jz) on "Russian Soldiers View Situation as Hopeless" video.
-
3
-
It would take years to re-equip the Russian military, to prepare new tactical and logistic policies and procedures and then to prepare manuals and trainers for the training required to pass on those principles and procedures to all of their military personnel. Such an extensive exercise is definitely not a short term project. However, it is the reason that Ukraine is adamant about not agreeing to a ceasefire, since that plays into Russia's hands, allowing them the opportunity to do just as you have said. That is particularly so if the ceasefire is allowed to extend for years.
Ukraine actually had some advantage in early 2022. Despite being militarily neutered, with regard to weapons, under the agreements following their independence in 1991 and the Budapest Memorandum signed on the 5 December 1994, the Ukrainians had over the years between 2014 and 2022, undertaken exercises and training with NATO military troops. Combined with their heroic defensive stand and the use of mainly shoulder mounted RPGs, and with the grand assistance of incompetence on the part of the Russian military, the Ukrainians still fought hard against the best troops that Russia could offer, to retain the capital of Kyiv and force the Russians to retreat.
The Russians, feeling the pressure early in 2022, started to use their trainers as troops in the field. Presumably they thought that the additional inclusion of specialist personnel in the field would turn their results in their favour. Even if the idea of a three day operation has been challenged, mainly by pro-Russian stooges in the form of shills, trolls, sympathisers and supporters, there has been evidence, with documents, of the existence of a 10 day plan to take over Ukraine.
https://www.republicworld.com/world-news/russia-ukraine-crisis/seized-russian-docs-reveal-moscows-10-day-plan-to-annex-ukraine-and-kill-top-leaders-articleshow.html
Written By Saumya joshi Last Updated: 2nd December, 2022 11:11 IST
In the Ukraine-Russia war, the details of Moscow's pre-invasion plan for Ukraine have surfaced, revealed by RUSI, a British defense and security think tank.
Needless to say, the Russians were becoming seriously concerned about their failures to take Ukraine after 30 days and then 3 months. Consequently, while I and many other people may be wrong, it appears that Russia has thrown "everything that they have in the toolbag" into the WAR waged by them against Ukraine. Unless we are all very mistaken, the Russian "patriotic" parade is further evidence of their diminished capability, both in terms of personnel, hardware and equipment.
While Russia's offensive and defensive capacity appears to be diminishing rapidly, the opposite is happening for Ukraine. Their inventory of hardware and equipment is increasing both in volume and capacity. The more oif this equipment that becomes available, the better the chances of Ukraine stayin in the fight and gradually reducing Russia's capacity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
From this WAR waged by Russia against Ukraine, it appears that there is nothing ".... more treacherous than a Russian." There have been examples, in the not so distant past, of such individual and national treachery, but Russia, at the present time appears to be at the forefront of that list in today's world. No doubt there are other less obvious examples arond the world now.
The very existence of such treachery, recognised now, in a nation thought to have been relatively friendly up until 2014, should make us more alert to its existence in other places throughout the world. Through the more recent events, maybe we can be more alert and aware of what to look for and how to deal with that treachery, in the earliest possible stages, when identified.
🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 VICTORY for UKRAINE 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
1
-
In principle, David, I agree with you. However, sometimes it may be worth letting the enemy know what they are up against, particularly Russia at the present time. Barring the Russia's possible use of nuclear weapons, which I don't think is likely, it is worth letting them clearly understand what they are up against, especially when it is likely that they already know, through their intelligence sources peppered throught-out the free world, what those resources being delivered to Ukraine are going to be.
The idea is to use those resources, not just as the weapons they are intended to be, but also for the demoralising effect that such knowledge has on the enemy, particularly if they know that their own weaposns are inferior in quality and fire-power, and even if they may be more numerous. We can already see examples of "the enemy running away", possibly because they know what is likely to be behind the vehicle or platform that they can see in their immediate centre of awareness.
🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 VICTORY for UKRAINE 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
1