Comments by "" (@jonlittle5032) on "GZERO Media" channel.

  1. What happened is you don't understand the difference between prophecy and analysis.
    11
  2. Don't worry; it is too hard for you to comprehend. You'll never see it coming.
    5
  3. And you are here ... why?
    3
  4. There were five; now there are four. So. Yes.
    3
  5. Who butters your bread?
    3
  6. He predicted nothing; it was an assessment, which is standard practice in analysis. When the data changes, the assessment changes.
    3
  7.  @TheDavidlloydjones  Keep swinging, sport. The cheap seats are on the floor laughing.
    2
  8. I think comments like this should be labeled as Monty Python skits.
    2
  9. Most of your Trump voters represent the F and the L of the DFL. What color are the ag states and the Rust Belt states? What did Bill Clinton say 32 years ago?
    1
  10. Can we please stop turning the news cycle over to the man with the hair piece? He's not serious and it isn't for sale.
    1
  11.  @alanconway94  Sure, sport. So. We won't be hearing from you again, right?
    1
  12.  @alanconway94  Explain. Sport.
    1
  13.  @alanconway94  Why not? You are spending a lot of time making an effort to articulate something. Or is this just an exercise in bathroom voyeurism? If so, close the door; we don't want to watch.
    1
  14.  @alanconway94  Yes.
    1
  15. Yep. But one is now gone.
    1
  16.  @leviccas_9294  Nope. Bremmer's analyses have been mostly spot on, because they are analyses and possible outcomes based on the data at hand. You are the one characterizing it as a prediction as if he were Jeane Dixon, so the 'analytical' error is on you.
    1
  17.  @leviccas_9294  A prediction is "the stock market will break new highs in four days". Bremmer said, "It DOESN'T LOOK like this is the end of Assad", after he spent several minutes presenting the data he used to make that analysis (Turkey wasn't all in, Russia is sending troops, and Iran is sending advisors) and that he had at hand. That is analysis based on available data, not a prediction.
    1
  18.  @JoeBlow-fp5ng  Yes, he is. The assessment was accurate; the data points upon which the assessment was made, changed. When the data changes, the assessment changes.
    1
  19.  @leviccas_9294  Sounds like a creationist trying to use the second law of thermodynamics to disprove evolution. Try again, sport.
    1
  20.  @leviccas_9294  Bremmer is not postulating a scientific theory. His assessment, not prediction, is based on information known at the time.
    1
  21. What about the economy? Ask Bill Clinton.
    1
  22.  @Dralchemy  What about disinfo campaigns that make superfluous correlations and arguments without understanding true democratic principles?
    1
  23.  @andrezcabara2774  Yep. Thanks for playing.
    1
  24. Assad's (both) violence was not targeted at Muslims; it was targeted at all who opposed him. USA did not overthrow Assad; those groups you said he killed so many of, overthrew Assad. HTS is a US, Israeli pawn?? Ok, sport. Iran got attacked after launching hundreds of missiles and drones at Israel. Does that clear it up?
    1
  25.  @Saeed-nikbakh  We didn't ask for yours.
    1
  26. Never played baseball before where I could just call in the pitches from home.
    1
  27.  @dojamimz  We Americans generally prefer truth, not innuendos, sport.
    1
  28.  @7788Sambaboy  Yes, though I would disagree that is an American attitude; rather it is likely universal. I was countering the identification of the OP, defining 'american' to be an identity that doesn't fit the narrative of the rest of us, but merely conforming to their own self-approval and self-righteousness. But otherwise, absolutely.
    1
  29. Nope. But we do know who you represent.
    1
  30. No. Israel threatening Iranian air shipments of arms could not have reasonably been foreseen. Given the intelligence at the time, this was good analysis. Oh. You don't differentiate between analysis and prophecy. Of course, you are right.
    1
  31. No. Funded by Turkey.
    1