Comments by "" (@jonlittle5032) on "Zeihan on Geopolitics" channel.

  1. Watch the video beyond the first paragraph. Zeihan addresses those points.
    1
  2.  @SignalCorps1  Pity you didn't watch the whole video. Clearly a consequence of ZDS.
    1
  3.  @RichardChappell1  Financial sanctions on associates of terror orgs is generally not considered a military op.
    1
  4.  @mikethompson3762  Classic example of Z DS.
    1
  5.  @RichardChappell1  Correct. It is my claim. OP said Zeihan ignored non-military consequences. That is false: Zeihan also discussed financial sanctions. You disagreed with my statement.
    1
  6.  @electricmiragemedia  Patreon website
    1
  7.  @jamesblancaflor3361  Trumptrollbrigade number 3
    1
  8. Let's see ... where is that TFR dial?
    1
  9.  @TomTomicMic  We certainly need a rational discourse on immigration that looks at all sides, not just the scapegoating. Especially in this time of aging demographics, which the consequences is also being completely ignored.
    1
  10. Why? Feeling challenged? Did you not listen to why not?
    1
  11. Given the actual demographics, that makes no sense. Are you saying there are vastly more 16-18 year olds than Boomers and Gen Xers?
    1
  12. Demographics also explains the labor shortage you say doesn't exist.
    1
  13. @ Focus. It helps comprehension.
    1
  14.  @monstroth  If you believe in democracy, question why your candidate lost. If you don't, go with the insults.
    1
  15. The only migration issue we have is we have a chronic and acute labor shortage that migration could solve.
    1
  16.  @Withnail1969  You do know both EU and US passed support packages and equipment and material are already being used? Did you not listen to the video? Ukraine has been increasing its barrages. What shortage are you talking about?
    1
  17. Those laws you speak of also speak of basic human rights. Basic universal human rights. The only people destroying Western values are the far-right.
    1
  18. Seriously, sport?
    1
  19.  @waynemasters8673  You are an embarrassment to our side.
    1
  20.  @gifmesome  Yeah! I think Putin called them 'threats' at the time.
    1
  21.  @Withnail1969  When are you signing up for something you believe in?
    1
  22.  @teddypicker8799  Air power. Huh. Did you watch the video?
    1
  23.  @teddypicker8799  Wrong.
    1
  24.  @teddypicker8799  a dozen? against Russia? Ok, maybe that's a little overkill, but, what the heck.
    1
  25.  @teddypicker8799  Is it 17? 5? 10? y'alls gotta get your stories straight.
    1
  26.  @teddypicker8799  During exercises (you know, practicing war conditions) sortie rates go way up.
    1
  27.  @teddypicker8799  A turn and burn is when a fighter comes down, pulls in, and sits and waits while the ground crew reloads and refuels. 10-15 minutes. It's like a pit stop at the Indy 500. No maintenance. So it is relevant and you need to watch Top Gun again, because they never showed a turn and burn. I know, because I watched it at the base theater when it came out. Dam Navy always gets the good movies; all we get is Iron Eagle. "Chappie? Can I fire a missile on the ground?" Half the theater walked it. NO!
    1
  28.  @teddypicker8799  LOL. DUDE. I was on a turn and burn pit for 3 years. Do NOT tell me what it is.
    1
  29.  @teddypicker8799  And there is no 'turn and burn' maneuver. Describe it, if you know.
    1
  30.  @teddypicker8799  DCS?? A video GAME?! Yeah. I'm sorry, dude. 200 hours on a game machine. That beats actual TIG/TIS.
    1
  31.  @teddypicker8799  Sims do not simulate ground ops.
    1
  32.  @teddypicker8799  And you accuse me of learning something from a movie that you haven't watched. Classic!
    1
  33.  @teddypicker8799  You would know, bro.
    1
  34.  @blackcatdungeonmastersfami5311  That's the best you got? Day old snark? Black Cat Dung is right.
    1
  35.  @haveagoodone5830  So why, with a navy and an air force, does the Russia navy retreat while Ukraine ships grain from Odesa and Russian AF cannot attain air superiority when you say Ukraine has neither? Evidence? How about results? or lack thereof.
    1
  36.  @haveagoodone5830  Lots of words that fail to address the observations that the Russian Navy is in retreat and the Russian Air Force can't hold the sky and, after three years, the Russian Army is sill the second best army in Ukraine. Keep trying.
    1
  37.  @haveagoodone5830  This verbosity tells me y'alls are terrified of what the Ukrainians can do with the F-16s.
    1
  38.  @haveagoodone5830  Classic. Declare victory and retreat.
    1
  39.  @haveagoodone5830  F-16s: Coming soon to a theatre (of operations) very near you.
    1
  40.  @haveagoodone5830  If y'alls are terrified of the consequences, leave Ukraine.
    1
  41.  @haveagoodone5830  I like the trademark comma at the start of your posts. Very edgy.
    1
  42.  @haveagoodone5830  If the Falcons are irrelevant, there is no nuclear scenario. Unless the Kremlin wants one. And they don't, so they won't.
    1
  43.  @haveagoodone5830  I think your last post got bounced. I saw the count go up, and then back down. Shame on you.
    1
  44.  @haveagoodone5830  Would it not make more sense to disable the Russian's domesday machine? to prevent irresponsible leaders from using the threat of it as a blunt instrument?
    1
  45.  @haveagoodone5830  By your logic, F-16s in Ukraine threaten to trigger Putin to strike with a nuclear attack. Why are a couple 'ineffective' F-16s the problem, but Putin's blatant threat to push the button is not the problem?
    1
  46.  @haveagoodone5830  Russia has the same 'concept'. Don't be disingenuous.
    1
  47.  @haveagoodone5830  Putin or F-16's: Which is the biggest nuclear threat?
    1
  48.  @haveagoodone5830  It isn't part of US Military Doctrine either. Again, disingenuous.
    1
  49.  @haveagoodone5830  Putin has repeatedly threatened European cities with first strike; Deployed F-16s threaten only Russian air defense and Russian air force illegally operating in Ukraine territory: which is more dangerous? Vlad or Falcons?
    1
  50.  @haveagoodone5830  LOL! I undestand your flight. To say that Putin's threats to 'retaliate' with nuclear weapons is not a first strike is, well, typically Russian. Thank you for clarifying your CONTEXT.
    1