Comments by "" (@jonlittle5032) on "Europe Takes One Step Closer to Nukes... || Peter Zeihan" video.

  1. 2. How does America deal with Britain, France, Israel?
    2
  2. The development was done during the Cold War. Just need to reboot.
    1
  3. The rhetoric, and actions, from Putin suggests he doesn't agree that the West abandoned Ukraine.
    1
  4. That was the intent of NATO from the start. America provides a nuclear umbrella and Europe forsakes nukes.
    1
  5. The proliferation of 'calamity' is a consequence of what is happening in the world. The analysis simply reflects that.
    1
  6. Nope. Given the availability of fissile material and a technological and commercial infrastructure capable of doing it, 6 months is a fair figure.
    1
  7.  @uripre  Iran started from scratch. Ukraine has deep history and experience with nuclear tech and science and has a lot of the precursor knowledge and tech already in place. 6 months is realistic for Ukraine and its nuclear development and operational history.
    1
  8.  @uripre  Did they take Kyiv in 3 days?
    1
  9.  @uripre  No they don't. They never had it, if they did, they would have taken Kyiv, wouldn't have lost Kharkiv or Kherson. And Ukraine forces wouldn't be on Russian soil nor would Ukrainian drones have clear skies for over a thousand miles into Russia.
    1
  10. If Russia had air superiority, how did the Ukrainians recently take out their major strategic radar site in southern Russia with drones - the one that is supposed to protect Russia from long-range ICBMs. Russia doesn't even have competent air defense, much less superiority.
    1
  11. Many defense analysts (ie Anders Puck Nielsen, Military analyst at the Royal Danish Defence College, etc) measure the time frame in months as well, not years.
    1
  12. Nope. By Zelenskyy.
    1
  13.  @M2m1x  Nope.
    1
  14. Wrong.
    1
  15. Russia is the big baddie you say it isn't.
    1
  16. Nope.
    1