Comments by "People Liberator" (@lvjinbin28) on "Americans Don't Understand The Truth About China" video.

  1. American politicians still not realized, their legitimacy is not from word liberalism or democracy but from people's livelihood, you can't say once you are liberal democracy then you are legitimate, it's like Soviet can't say once I'm socialism dmocracy then I must be legitimate, meanwhile people can't get enough food, right? if American politicians think I'm democratic so people must support me, then people will hate the word democracy or your defination of democracy one day just like word 'socialism' Mao zedong China used to export socialism ideology to the world competing with USA and even Soviet influence when China's GDP per capita is even lower than Africa then, finally extreme poverty just made Deng xiaoping China to stop caring about other countries 'liberation' but Chinese people's own and real liberation for this 40 years, 1978 REFORM happened. Soviet easily collapsing really shocked China, after then China really started to play a humble and low-key role in the world, trying so hard to make friend with every big or small power for economy, like only focus on economy growth and people's livelihood to prove this oldschool socialist government's legitimacy in this 30 years, finally this Chinese Platinum Age is even more successful than American Gilded age, if American 5% annual GDP growth is Gilded for 30 years then Chinese 10% annual GDP growth like for this 30 years must be platinum, China GDP PPP was same like African but turned into Europe economy, if there's one African leader unified whole African union and make Africa rich like Europe in 30 years, African people will respect him like Black Panther for sure, American people may prefer 'Procedural Democracy' but most Chinese prefer 'Result Democracy', the problem is once 'your perfect procedure can't always cause good result', even 'always can't cause good result', then your procedure lost your legitimacy and interpretation of democracy, right?
    1
  2. American politicians still not realized, their legitimacy is not from word liberalism or democracy but from people's livelihood, you can't say once you are liberal democracy then you are legitimate, it's like Soviet can't say once I'm socialism dmocracy then I must be legitimate, meanwhile people can't get enough food, right? if American politicians think I'm democratic so people must support me, then people will hate the word democracy or your defination of democracy one day just like word 'socialism' Mao zedong China used to export socialism ideology to the world competing with USA and even Soviet influence when China's GDP per capita is even lower than Africa then, finally extreme poverty just made Deng xiaoping China to stop caring about other countries 'liberation' but Chinese people's own and real liberation for this 40 years, 1978 REFORM happened. Soviet easily collapsing really shocked China, after then China really started to play a humble and low-key role in the world, trying so hard to make friend with every big or small power for economy, like only focus on economy growth and people's livelihood to prove this oldschool socialist government's legitimacy in this 30 years, finally this Chinese Platinum Age is even more successful than American Gilded age, if American 5% annual GDP growth is Gilded for 30 years then Chinese 10% annual GDP growth like for this 30 years must be platinum, China GDP PPP was same like African but turned into Europe economy, if there's one African leader unified whole African union and make Africa rich like Europe in 30 years, African people will respect him like Black Panther for sure, American people may prefer 'Procedural Democracy' but most Chinese prefer 'Result Democracy', the problem is once 'your perfect procedure can't always cause good result', even 'always can't cause good result', then your procedure lost your legitimacy and interpretation of democracy, right?
    1