Comments by "People Liberator" (@lvjinbin28) on "Firstpost"
channel.
-
345
-
53
-
36
-
30
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
25
-
25
-
23
-
20
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
8
-
8
-
finally Vietnamese learnt lesson from 3 Indochina wars, if Vietnamese is pro-France anti-communist, pro-USA anti-communist, pro-Soviet anti-Chinese,
capitalist or communsit Vietnamese will get punished and contained if China saw neighbors hooked up with other superpower militarily,
now smart Vietnam refused to join American Bamboo Curtain 2.0 to contain Chinese, because Vietcong knew they can't deter or scare China with USA militarily again,
that's why Vietcong will be more neutral, not too anti-China but also not anti-USA, then Vietnam will get economic benefits from both and freeze South China Sea issue,
only naive and uneducated Bongbong refused Duterte route but joined anti-Chinese military encirclement and boycotted Chinese economic and infrastructure help,
so Philippines will be proxy war battlefield in Fourth Indochina War after Xi isolated Bongbong in ASEAN, it's very dangerous for Philippines if they don't know Cold War history!!
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I find you are so ignorant and confident, so why doesn’t the United States or India do it? Why doesn’t any major Western country do this? Why don’t anti-China Soviet politicians do it during Sino-Soviet Split 1959-1989, Sino-Soviet Conflicts 1969? Why Bongbong still doesn’t do it yet?
Because CCP can also checkmate Philippines by dropping diplomatic recognition, and the principle of peaceful coexistence, and then CCP can make full retaliation against the Philippines,
I can give an example. The PRC did not recognize the independence of the Republic of Korea. Before 1992, the PRC only recognized the "one Korea policy under Korean communist." Therefore, Mao Zedong armed Kim Il Sung's North Korea to use force to unify Syngman Rhee's regime.
However, after 1992, when the PRC established diplomatic relations with the Republic of Korea, the CCP gave up most of its hostile policies against South Korea and even make China into South Korea’s largest export destination, even try to win over the pro-China leftist party in South Korea.
Similarly, the CCP only recognized the "One Vietnam Policy under Vietnam communist", so the CCP armed the Viet Minh, the Communist Party of Indochina to attack the French army, French Indochina, State of Vietnam, South Vietnam, and the US military stationed in Vietnam.
The PRC recognized the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (Ho Chi Minh's North Vietnam) in 1950, and the Le Duan's unified Socialist Republic of Vietnam in 1975. However, PRC attacked Vietnam in 1979, but it has never canceled diplomatic relations with Vietnam. So, why didn’t Le Duan, who was so pro-Soviet and anti-China, cancel diplomatic relations with the PRC? Because once Vietnam cancels this diplomatic relationship, it will be more difficult for its successor to restore diplomatic relations in the future.
The Republic of China(Taiwan) has 13 diplomatic countries, including 2 Central American countries (Belize and Guatemala), 4 Caribbean countries (Haiti, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines) and 4 Pacific countries. (Marshall Islands, Nauru, Palau, Tuvalu), as well as 1 country in South America (Paraguay), 1 country in Africa (Swaziland), and 1 country in Europe (Vatican City). Although these small countries are more pro-Taiwan under American influence but not really anti-China, so Beijing did not show more obvious hostility towards them. PRC just continued to develop economic and trade relations and waited for these countries to establish diplomatic relations with Beijing for economy.
In 1975, the PRC and the Philippines established diplomatic relations, and the CCP stopped supporting communist rebles in Philippines.
In 1999, Macedonia canceled diplomatic relations with the PRC and instead established diplomatic relations with Taiwan's ROC. The PRC exercised its veto power in the United Nations Security Council and vetoed the extension of the period for the United Nations peacekeeping troops to be stationed in Macedonia. This was the CCP's deliberate retaliation against Macedonia, which resulted in Macedonia fell into a longer civil war.
In 2021, Lithuania announced that it would allow Taiwan to open Taiwan representative offices in Lithuania under the name "Taiwanese". However, all countries opened Taiwan representative offices under the name "Taipei". The PRC began to retaliate diplomatically and economically against Lithuania, boycotting all made in Lithuania products and forced EU investments to leave Lithuania.
For a small country like Lithuania, China did not offend it. Lithuania was too pro-American and anti-Russian, and therefore adopted an anti-China line.
Poroshenko is pro-American, pro-China, and anti-Russian, while Zelensky is pro-American, anti-Russian, and anti-China. Therefore, China adopts a neutral and pro-Russian attitude towards Ukraine. Although China does not recognize that Crimea belongs to Russia, Xi Jinping explicitly prevented Putin from using tactical nuclear bombs against Ukraine.
But if Russia wants to retaliate against the US military in Lithuania, will China give Lithuania any help? A small country like Lithuania knows that it can benefit from relying on the United States, but it does not know the cost of offending China and Russia.
If the Philippines completely betrays Beijing and establishes diplomatic relations with Taiwan, then the CCP will regard the Philippines as an enemy country, support the communist rebels in the Philippines, support the Moro Resistance and Liberation Organisasyon, make Mindanao go independent, impose trade sanctions on the Philippines, and regain control of the Philippines of all the Spratly Islands.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Musk seems support Russian invaders in Ukraine's Donbass, but Musk seems against USA invader in China's Taiwan, clearly Musk doesn't use same liberal rule or UN charter,
so why Musk plays double standard but opposite to USA government's double standard? USA is against Donbass separatist but pro-Taiwan separatist so Musk acts like traitor,
but the richest man Musk doesn't want American poor man to fight against Russian or Chinese poor man in Donbass or Taiwan, because it's bad for global economy,
why blame him? you got more money than him if global economy collapse? you got more chance than him to escape draft for WWIII?
Musk realized clearly it's USA containing China and Russia in Cold War 2.0, especially American military industrial complex would make huge money from conflicts,
Yes he sold many cars in China, maybe he can't sell cars in Russia, but if global economy collapse then nobody buys his cars, why he can't care about world economy?
we should be thankful that this rich man doesn't get rich by pushing a poor man to kill another poor man, if you want war then show me you joined the army.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
CCP attacked South Vietnam invader and retook territory from 9 dash-line, Battle of Paracel Islands 1974, US navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't condemn that extremely tiny PLA navy then, even when S.Vietnam still should be defended by SEATO 1954-1977.
CCP attacked Viet cong navy expansionist against Soviet's encirclement, Johnson South Reef Skirmish 1988, Soviet red navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't even say one word against relatively weak PLA navy then, even Vietnam should be defended by Soviet-Vietnam Military Treaty 1978-1991.
Did India win 1962 war when both West and Soviet supported Nehru? imperialism is a paper tiger, Modi should know that China is no longer like in 1962, if India wants to contain China again then what if China would also play tougher as revenge? PLA navy warships will definitely be stationed in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives to push back containment from Mod's Foward Policy 2.0.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
most people doesn't know USA tried to block Chinese from nukes, space station, navigation satellite, and supercomputer chips technology then China just made own, it's 'what doesn't oppress me only makes me freer.'
Wassenaar Arrangement embargoed thousands of military or small civilian technology for 70 decades, but such oppression only made China as largest and most independent industrial powerhouse, like today China's industrial output is more than G7 combined, for example only USA and China got Internet giants on top 10 even whole EU doesn't have one, only China got Internet sovereignty means USA's propaganda warfare can't spread Color Revolution/Regime Change easily in China like did against Soviet Yugoslavia Syria Ukraine,
meanwhile India can't even produce own bullets because India never got blocked by both West and Russia, India can always buy Western or Russian advanced weapons easily,
actually not only West embargoed China after Korean War 1953 until today, people doesn't know Soviet also fully embargoed China during Sino-Soviet Split 1959-1989, Soviet warned CCP not to make own nukes, Soviet waged total containment warfare against China in Vietnam Afghanistan after Sino-Soviet War 1969,
anyway, why China has most independent military, politics, media, finance, technology, even agriculture? because China attacked both USA and Soviet and got sanctioned, embargoed, isolated, nuke-threatened by both capitalism world and socialism world in last Cold War,
Japan kowtowed to USA's trade war so easily in 1980s and collapsed in 1990s because Japan's military, political, financial colony, Japan just can't rise beyond his ceiling designed by USA, so freedom is not free, that's why CCP must confront against her big bro Soviet in 1960s for full autonomy,
but today China also has weakness like too much depending on Western market and Australian resource, so China is de-risking with pro-US countries by establishing close ties with neutral world through BRI BRICS SCO RCEP etc, China invested heavily like 13 times bigger than Marshall Plan to make Third world rich for alternative market and resource since 2009, China already exported more to 153 BRI countries than USA+EU+Japan combined in 2023 but still risky, so what CCP is preparing? once China can complete decoupling then collective West can't sanction China at all, then China would attack US military bases in First island Chain, because China confronted againt West and Soviet's containment with proxy wars in Korea Vietnam Afghanistan, so don't be surprised China would confront against West in Taiwan Korea Vietnam Japan Philippines, because that's all China's Cuba or Ukraine, but before China really wages proxy wars against USA then China should get fully prepared, that's how China learned lesson from Russia's unprepared operation.
if USA can't use tech war or trade war to choke China, then USA need to fight a proxy war or real war.
3
-
PRC and Myanmar have a very complicated relationship. CCP once had great relation with Myanmar in 1950s, The CCP once cooperated with Myanmar to chase the ROC troops in northern Myanmar. The two sides also demarcated the border line peacefully, and Mao made major concessions with Ne Wen regime 1960, but when Ne Wen became more pro-US and pro-Soviet after coup, Mao supported the Myanmar communist against the Ne Wen junta, after the West imposed sanctions on the junta after 8888 revolution, Deng supported the isolated junta since then.
After Aung San Suu Kyi came to power, China supported pro-democracy Aung San Suu Kyi regime, and the separatist armed forces in northern Myanmar had an unclear relationship with China. China sometimes regarded them as drug dealers, but it did not want the Myanmar to exterminate the Myanmar Chinese.
In 2015, Myanmar military planes invaded Chinese Yunnan and killed five Chinese citizens with artillery shells, Myanmar finally apologized. Every time this kind of shelling occurs, it will lead to China's military exercises on the border, and then the junta can only give up attacking the rebels on the border.
Therefore, China supports the military government because China does not want the junta to be pro-American.
The junta is actually anti-China, but the all Burmese needs Chinese trade.
China needs to crack down on Chinese fraudsters and drug dealers on the border but some are related to Chinese minority rebels,
China also uses the rebels to crack down on the Burmese army and fraudsters sometimes, it's just a messy relation.
In fact, China prefers Aung San Suu Kyi. Although she is the goddess of democracy that the West has always supported, she unexpectedly did not follow the United States based on ideology after she came to power. Aung San Suu Kyi did not join the U.S. military encirclement because Myanmar know that they will be retaliated by China and lose the Chinese market.
In 2009, the pro-China Chinese rebel leader Peng Jiasheng was overthrown after a local coup.
Later, his subordinates took control of the Kokang with the support of Min Aung Hlaing, but used fraud to make money, causing some social problems in China.
China has long suspected that Min Aung Hlaing's military government supported the fraudsters, so it once again armed pro-China rebel leaders.
However, China has not made up its mind to retaliate against Min Aung Hlaing's regime. China's temporary goal is to produce a fraud industry and let pro-China rebels take charge of Kokang. It should not have a higher goal because China is worried that the expansion of the war will lead to a huge number of refugee,
3
-
3
-
there's 153 countries joined BRI, 130 BRI countries leaders, 30 international organization leaders including António Guterres in Beijing now, Putin is meeting so many friendly leaders, it's like Xi hosts a small United Nations in Beijing for Putin, so who isolate who? it will be Global South isolated West.
but why they prefer Chinese debt trap not IMF aid? are those elites stupid than you? Indians are good at talking, so India invented creative propaganda against BRI, then West love and spread it against China, but Xi is a real doer.
well, jealous India, EU and hateful USA know BRI is good that's why they copy and make own, but if you don't really study why Global South choose China, you can never compete with China if based on lies.
when Europe economy shrinks more, they will also join BRI and USA will be only isolated!
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@muralidhar40 Later, the U.S. Wall Street led to the global financial crisis in 2008. The purchasing power of all developed countries has been shrinking, so China's growth rate has been declining if buyers can't buy more, and China has also abandoned its high-growth economic model, such as using strict environmental protection policies to eliminate polluting industries, so China's GDP growth has become slower, but cleaner and healthier. But India cannot abandon highly polluting industries that's why Indian cities are full of smog, anyways after the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis, the CCP decided to no longer trust the U.S. political and financial system.
That’s why China launched the Belt and Road Initiative in 2013. As the United States intensifies its containment of China, Xi then accelerate its decoupling from the United States and link with the 153 Belt and Road countries. Now China’s economy is in a transition period, transforming towards high technology, transition to non-Western countries, but is 5% growth rate low? It seems you are not good at math. How much did India increase its GDP last year, and how much did China increase its GDP? do the math then.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Haha so childish. You can call it as you want, but did the Chinese get the South China Sea just by naming it? nope, You need to make huge sacrifices in wars.
The Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty
Article 2
It is recognized that under Article 2 of the Treaty of Peace with Japan signed at the city of San Francisco in the United States of America on September 8, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the San Francisco Treaty), Japan has renounced all right, title and claim to Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores) as well as the Spratly Islands and the Paracel Islands.
Well, The West and the Soviet Union supported ROC to take over the South China Sea islands in 1946, Why didn’t the West support the American Philippines or French Vietnam when they are much near?? because ROC was the only independent country in Asia then, KMT and CCP killed more Japanese fascists than Southeast Asian countries combined, the colonial troops in Southeast Asia surrendered to Japan in 1942.
Ironically it's the US navy gave warships to the ROC navy, so Chinese could control Taiping Island, Thitu Island, Triton Island, and Woody Island in 1946, then The Kuomintang government (KMT) in Nanjing drew the 11-dash line in 1947, today Taiwan(KMT or DPP) still claims 11-dashline in ROC constitution and controls Taiping island and Pratas Island. The PRC inherited the ROC's 11-dash line after civil war 1949, but CCP changed it to a 9-dash line in 1957 because Mao Zedong gave Bach Long Vi Island to Ho Chi Minh when CCP supported Viet Cong against the West.
CCP armed North Vietnam against France, USA and South Vietnam in First&Second Indochina War 1950-1975, PLA navy killed 100+ South Vietnam soldiers and retook Paracel Islands in 1974.
CCP attacked Viet Cong and armed Khmer Rouge against Vietnam in 1979-1991 Third Indochina War, PLA navy killed 64 Viet Cong soldiers and retook Johnson South Reef Spratly Islands in 1988.
Anyways, You need to win the WWII to rewrite new world order, not by talking or naming.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@KiriAatam The shortest distance between the landing site of Chandrayaan-3 and the South Pole Polar Region of the moon is still 619 kilometers, which is still far away from the South Pole region, because the area of the South Pole region is like 5000 square kilometers, which is smaller than State of Sikkim, so can Indian propaganda say that landing in Kolkata is equivalent to landing in Sikkim? Therefore, the Indian media said 'the moon's South Pole' or 'near the South Pole region', actually the landing site is not even near to South Pole region, The straight-line distance between Mumbai and Hyderabad is 630 kilometers. Is it close?
The Chinese lunar rover landed on the moon in 2013. The Yutu-2 lunar rover has been working for 4 years and 8 months until today, It is the lunar rover that has working on the lunar surface for the longest time but yours is sleeping, China can even bring lunar soil back to the earth, who is jealous? So overconfident
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@@mudshovel289-fu5tx While the elite troops of the Viet Cong were busy occupying Cambodia, the CCP suddenly launched a month-long hit and run military campaign of "de-industrialization," "de-agriculture," and "de-infrastructure" in northern Vietnam, This is Deng's cruel revenge for Le Duan's ethnic cleansing of the Chinese minority in Vietnam, also the factories in northern Vietnam were all built by Mao Zedong era got wiped out, before the large Vietcong forces returned to defend the north, the CCP quickly withdrew its troops and returned to China. This prevented the Chinese from engaging in guerrilla warfare like the French and Americans. The CCP also quickly returned to its defenses to prepare for the massive Soviet troops in Mongolia heading south to Beijing.
The CCP is of course very familiar with the Viet Cong's guerrilla warfare and tunnel warfare, because these were Mao Zedong's tactics against the Japanese. It was Mao Zedong who gave most food and weapons to Ho Chi Minh won the People's War against the French colonists and American imperialist. First of all, the CCP claims to be anti-imperialist and anti-colonial, Of course, This military operation is retaliatory in nature, not occupation in nature, CCP will not occupy other countries’ land. Therefore, the Chinese will certainly not be stupid enough to occupy the entire Vietnam or even capture Hanoi.
After the CCP ran back to the territory, the Vietnamese naturally wanted to retaliate. Then there were 12 years of border standoff, confrontation and shelling. China's various military regions took turns to drain Vietnam and Soviet's finances. At the same time, the CCP has always supported the anti-Vietnam guerrillas of the Khmer Rouge because All of Vietnam's heavy industry was destroyed by that month's military campaign, so the Viet Cong relied on Soviet financial and military aid for everything.
Vietnam's expansion to the Thai border led to conflicts, allowing the West and ASEAN to fund anti-Vietnam non-communist guerrillas. When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan to support pro-Soviet communist puppets, the CCP also used CIA money to buy donkeys and light weapons through the Pakistan to arm Mujahideen against Soviet Union.
Faced with the Soviet Union’s anti-China military encirclement in Vietnam and Afghanistan, the CCP cooperated with the West to support anti-Soviet proxy wars in Vietnam and Afghanistan. In the end, the Soviet Union withdrew from Afghanistan and even disintegrated. Vietnam withdrew from Laos and Cambodia. Vietnam was unable to unify the French Indochina Federation, China's north and south threat disappeared.
Because the CCP's attack on the pro-Soviet Viet Cong led the United States to lift the 30-year post-war sanctions and blockade after Korean War, all capitalists from such as Hong Kong, Taiwan, Japan, Europe, and the United States invested in Deng Xiaoping's reform and opening up policy, Chinese people did not feel the impact of the war, When China became richer and richer, Vietnam was blocked by West ASEAN, and bleed by China and Cambodia.. Since then, China's economy has grown at an average annual rate of With a growth of 9.5% for 30 years, the United States peacefully withdrew its troops from Taiwan, recognized the communist PRC and abandoned the capitalist ROC.
So what did China lose? What did Vietnam win again? China is the winner in military, diplomacy, economy and strategy, China's biggest mistake was that China never predicted that the Soviet Union was so fragile and could collapse and disintegrate so easily, leading to the demise of the communist movement around the world. Therefore, CCP once again had to face the threat of the US military in the first island chain.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
there's 153 countries joined BRI, 130 BRI countries leaders, 30 international organization leaders including António Guterres in Beijing now, Putin is meeting so many friendly leaders, it's like Xi hosts a small United Nations in Beijing for Putin, so who isolate who? it will be Global South isolated West.
but why they prefer Chinese debt trap not IMF aid? are those elites stupid than you? Indians are good at talking, so India invented creative propaganda against BRI, then West love and spread it against China, but Xi is a real doer.
well, jealous India, EU and hateful USA know BRI is good that's why they copy and make own, but if you don't really study why Global South choose China, you can never compete with China if based on lies.
when Europe economy shrinks more, they will also join BRI and USA will be only isolated!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@hendka6006 You are really ignorant of history. The China you are talking about is the Republic of China, which is now ROC Taiwan today.
Because British India, British Burma, the Russian Empire, the Japanese Empire, and French Vietnam once encroached on the territory of the Qing Empire, but the Qing government was too corrupt and weak to take it back until collapse.
Later, the ROC established by Sun Yat-sen inherited all the territorial claims of the Qing Dynasty, but ROC immediately fell into three decades of wars with warlords, Japanese and communists, so Kuomingtang could not regain it until got kicked to Taiwan 1949, so those disputed/lost territory since Qing Empire is still claimed by Taiwan on its ROC constituion.
After 1949, the PRC also inherited the territory of the ROC. Because too long time had passed, it was impossible for the CCP to go to war with all surrounding countries to regain its past territories. Therefore, the CCP and
Because of the Korean War and the Sino-Soviet split, the CCP was contained by both USA and Soviet allies. At that time, the CCP was not so strong that it could go to war with all surrounding countries, so the PRC made some compromises, PRC made compromises on borderline with Myanmar, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, Vietnam, Tajikistan, settled the land border disputes through friendly negotiations, and the land borders were only India and Bhutan controlled by India. The Qing government, the ROC government never recognized the McMahon Line, and India Inheriting the colonial legacy, Nehru's refusal to make any concessions led to the 1962 war and the Sino-Indian hostility to this day. Of course, the ROC Taiwan refused to recognize any agreements between the PRC and other countries, Therefore, today Taiwan has territorial disputes with all surrounding countries on ROC constituion.
What remains is the dispute in the South China Sea. Today, Taiwan still claims the 11-dash line, but Beijing changed from the 11-dash line to claiming the 9-dash line in 1957, because the CCP gave Bach Long Vi Island as a gift to North Vietnam to monitor the South Vietnam or American reconnaissance aircraft in 1957, considering that the Viet Cong has become pro-American again today, the CCP must regret its generosity back then.
2
-
2
-
2
-
Since 2018, the United States has sanctioned more than a thousand Chinese companies, and India has also boycotted hundreds of Chinese apps and plundered investments such as Xiaomi. In contrast, China rarely retaliates against American or Indian companies on an equal footing. There are three reasons: First, since the United States has become increasingly protectionist, ironically the Communist Party wants to lead free trade, market economy, and globalization. Second, if China does not even attack American companies, then this signal is that China still welcomes all foreign capital to invest and make money in China. Third, China feels that sanctioning foreign companies may cause damage to its own economy too.
However, as the U.S. technology war intensifies, the CCP will gradually find that compromise and concession are useless.
2
-
UN force in Korean War: USA, S.Korea, Australia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Canada, France, the Philippines, Turkey, Thailand, South Africa, Greece, Belgium, Luxembourg, Colombia and Ethiopia provided varying numbers of fighting troops. In addition, Sweden and Denmark each sent a hospital ship, and India, Norway and Italy sent their own field ambulance teams
Anti-communist force in Vietnam War: USA, S.Vietnam, S.Korea, Laos, Khmer, Australia, Thailand, New Zealand, Taiwan, Philippines provided varying numbers of fighting troops.
Can USA bring more support to win Cold War 2.0?
2
-
@ElDCru-ow8de Ukraine will not win, Russia will not stop, USA will not kowtow, and China will remain in the background. because China will not allow Putin regime anti-American Russian regime to collapse, so China will be supporting Russia and China is 10 times the GDP of Russia, China does not need to sell weapons to Russia now, nor does it need to provide weapons to Russia for free. China is only buying Russian oil and gas, just filling the Russian market with Chinese goods, This is enough for Russia to maintain its offensive status against NATO.
The United States is very smart and has never leave East Asia for Europe or West Asia. In fact, China and the United States both know what the other side is thinking. China has been waiting for the U.S. ground forces, not only U.S. Air Force to massively enter Ukraine and Israel, once NATO troops enters Ukraine battlefield, China will open its weapons arsenal to the proxy Russia and Belarus then let the war in Ukraine continue for another ten even twenty years, until China will use Ukraine and Russia to bring down the European Union, even weaken both Russia and the United States, or make the division of Europe and the United States.
Similarly, once the U.S. ground forces, not only U.S. Air Force massively enters Syria to attack Iran, China will assist the Muslim world's resistence to weaken American economy and reputation, This is why China brokered an Iran-Saudi rapprochement to isolate Israel, because Israel is father of Americans rather than cannon fodder like Ukraine.
Once the United States got trapped in the Middle East or Eastern Europe proxy war battlefields, China will attack those pro-US containment regime in the first island chain, and the United States simply cannot enter three-front war at the same time. The United States' current strength is unable to rescue Ukraine, Israel, and the Philippines/Taiwan at the same time.
Whether fighting a conventional war or a war of attrition, China's industrial strength and the institutional advantages of socialist centralism are more advantageous than those of the pro-American world.
because China’s industrial output is USA+Japan+Germany+Brazil+Canada. China will definitely trap the US military into the battlefields of Eastern Europe and the Middle East in order to break through the U.S. containment in East Asia,
Just like CCP used the Viet Cong to weaken France and the United States in a 30-year proxy war of attrition during First&Second Indochina War.
Just like CCP used Khmer Rouge in Cambodia and Sino-Vietnamese border conflicts to weaken Soviet-funded Vietnam in 12-year Third Indochina War.
Just like CCP used Afghan mujihideen to weaken Soviet in 10-year Soviet Afghan War in a 10-year war of attrition to bring down the economy of the Soviet Union.
Over the past 30 years, China and Ukraine have had very good relations because Ukraine is pro-Russian, pro-China, and friendly to the United States. However, Zelensky is pro-American and anti-China, Ukrainian politicians have visited Taiwan even during the war, so China will not sympathize with the pro-American anti-Chinese regime. Now Cold War 2.0 has begun, China is facing a comprehensive military containment by the United States in Asia. Chinese politicians also have stopped admonishing/warning the United States. Because the anti-China policies of both parties in the United States will not change, Therefore, China will also be determined to join the new Cold War until the United States gives up containing China, or one party completely collapses and disintegrates.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Musk seems support Russian invaders in Ukraine's Donbass, but Musk seems against USA invader in China's Taiwan, clearly Musk doesn't use same liberal rule or UN charter,
so why Musk plays double standard but opposite to USA government's double standard? USA is against Donbass separatist but pro-Taiwan separatist so Musk acts like traitor,
but the richest man Musk doesn't want American poor man to fight against Russian or Chinese poor man in Donbass or Taiwan, because it's bad for global economy,
why blame him? you got more money than him if global economy collapse? you got more chance than him to escape draft for WWIII?
Musk realized clearly it's USA containing China and Russia in Cold War 2.0, especially American military industrial complex would make huge money from conflicts,
Yes he sold many cars in China, maybe he can't sell cars in Russia, but if global economy collapse then nobody buys his cars, why he can't care about world economy?
we should be thankful that this rich man doesn't get rich by pushing a poor man to kill another poor man, if you want war then show me you joined the army.
2
-
2
-
@SeaKrait571 Bullying the Philippines? If the Philippines supports Taiwanese separatists, occupying Chinese islands as an invader, even joins the American anti-China encirclement, why can't China bully the invader/enemy? Once China loses its all patience and gives up to calm the Philippines, you will see what real bullying is.
Chinese netizens regretted their tolerance of Duterte because he changed from a pro-American invader to an anti-American invader. Therefore, China stopped arming Scarborough Shoal and allowed Filipino fishermen to fish in Chinese waters. But when Bongbong coming to power, he completely betrayed Xi Jinping.
Therefore, Chinese netizens have been blaming the CCP for its over-tolerance, defensive and conservative foreign policy. The Chinese hope to immediately expel Filipinos from the South China Sea islands, and take back all the islands and reefs controlled by the Philippines, and even those controlled by Vietnam and Malaysia. But based on geopolitical relations, China should first fully retaliate against the Philippines.
I think you have always had a fantasy, thinking that you can bully China at will at your own reason, if you want to change the order of World War II at will, and then set a new rule to make China kneel to the United States.
When PRC was weak, China attacked US in Korean War, so CCP won't kowtow but take revenge on you guys, because you yourselves are too ignorant.
2
-
UN force in Korean War :USA, S.Korea, Australia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Canada, France, the Philippines, Turkey, Thailand, South Africa, Greece, Belgium, Luxembourg, Colombia and Ethiopia provided varying numbers of fighting troops. In addition, Sweden and Denmark each sent a hospital ship, and India, Norway and Italy sent their own field ambulance teams
why only four in QUAD? you should bring more, let's see who can bully who.
2
-
2
-
Some people seems very happy but if the CCP is determined to retaliate against the Philippines, will India and the United States send troops or navy? How long can they defend the Philippines? once? twice? one decade? two decade? You guys don't know Cold War history or geopolitics?
The West successfully formed an anti-communist The Bamboo Curtain. But what is CCP’s response? deterred? scared? kowtowed? NO, China has escalated its retaliatory measures like Mao Zedong exported anti-Western communist revolution to the world, especially in Southeast Asia. the PRC then intervened in the 3- year Korean War, 25-year Taiwan Strait Crises, 9-year the First Indochina War, 20-year the Vietnam War, and the Sino-Indian Conflicts 1962 1967. the PRC defeated the South Vietnam navy and retook the Paracel Islands in 1974. Why US Navy in Cam Ranh Bay didn't fight or even condemn the tiny PLA navy when South Vietnam should be defended by SEATO (Southeast Asia Treaty Organization 1954–1977)??
The Soviet Union also successfully formed an anti-Chinese encirclement. As a result, the CCP intervened in the Sino-Indian Conflicts 1962 1967, the Sino-Soviet Conflicts 1969, 13-year the Third Indochina War, and 10-year the Soviet-Afghanistan War, and CCP exported so many anti-Soviet proxy wars in Asia and Africa. the PRC defeated the Viet Cong navy and retook Johnson South Reef in 1988. Why the Soviet navy in Cam Ranh Bay didn't fight or even say a word against the weak PLA navy for Viet Cong when Vietnam should be defended by Soviet-Vietnam Military Treaty (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics-Socialist Republic of Viet Nam: Treaty of Friendship and Co-Operation 1978–2003).
Everyone Has a Plan Until They Get Punched in the Mouth ----Mike Tyson
Every Power Contained CCP Until They Got Weakened In A War of Attrition. -----CCP
Deng Xiaoping visited ASEAN and US in 1978, after then he fully retaliated against pro-Soviet Le Duan, because he expelled Boat People, occupied Paracel and Cambodia.
The Bongbong is very dangerous now because the United States is busy war in Ukraine and Israel, and CCP is uniting ASEAN to isolate the Philippines now.
2
-
ROC declared the 11-dash line in 1945. the West and the Soviet Union asked the Chinese to take over South China Sea after Japanese withdrew, US navy gave 8 warships to Chinese and helped ROC navy to control Taiping Island, Thitu Island, Triton Island, and Woody Island in 1946. At that time, all Southeast Asian countries were Western colonies, They were not sovereign and independent countries, so when the Western masters gave the South China Sea as a gift to the Chinese, for Chinese sacrifice and contribution in World War II. American Philippines, French Vietnam, British Malaya, British Brunei, Dutch Indonesia, they didn't and can't object Chinese claim in 1945, then 11-dash line will be regarded as the World War II order by the Kuomintang and CCP.
The PRC inherited the 11-line and claim same in 1949 after Chinese Civil War, but today Beijing only claims the 9-dash line because Mao Zedong gave the Bach Long Vi to Ho Chi Minh in 1957 served as a base to monitor Western reconnaissance aircraft during Vietnam War. Of course Mao Zedong would not have thought that Deng Xiaoping and the pro-Soviet Le Duan would go to war in 1978, nor would he have thought that today's Viet Cong would become more pro-American. I think the CCP must have regretted removing the two-dash line in 1957, just like Putin today regretted that Khrushchev gave Crimea to his best ally Ukraine.
However, because ROC has always been a puppet of the United States, when the Philippines seized Thitu Island from Taiwan navy during 1971 storm, then Taiwan canceled its retaliatory military operations under pressure from the United States. The PRC retook the Paracel Islands from South Vietnam in 1974 and Johnson South Reef from the Viet Cong in 1988. And because the PRC navy was still weak and backward, also the CCP paid more attention to the economy after the Cold War. Therefore, the PRC did not seize the very distant Spratly Islands.
From a Chinese perspective, the presence of the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Indonesia in the South China Sea are all invaders and a disruption to the order of World War II. Today's separatist party in Taiwan still occupy Taiping Island and Dongsha Island. Although they have not canceled the 11-dash line in the ROC constitution, they have kept a very low profile in line with US propaganda. If the United States wants to rewrite the order of World War II and force the CCP to abandon the legacy of World War II, the United States must defeat the PRC in the Fourth Indochina War, Cold War 2.0, and World War III.
The international community was willing to let the Chinese take over the South China Sea in 1945. That was because the KMT/CCP eliminated more Japanese than Southeast Asians and resisted since 1931 until 1945, and all Southeast Asian countries and colonial troops surrendered to Japan in 1942. so the Philippines will should win your trophy by sacrificing more blood in WWIII than the Chinese did in WWII, does the Philippines really think you can gain territory by relying on US and propaganda wars? The CCP has never relied on propaganda wars to rise. The CCP was the winner of the Civil War, World War II, the Korean War, the First Indochina War, the Second Indochina War, the Sino-Indian War, the Sino-Soviet War, and the Third Indochina War.
However, due to geopolitical relations in Cold War 2.0, China does not want to push all ASEAN to the United States. Therefore, as a strong power, China has proposed a code of conduct in the South China Sea. No one can occupy new uninhabited islands. All parties should freeze the status quo and develop their economies. However, only the Philippines refuses to join this club. Therefore, China will think that Bongbong is used by the United States to undermine China-ASEAN relation.Therefore, China will only isolate and retaliate against the pro-American proxy/invader, not Duterte but Bongbong regime in the Philippines, CCP will give more benefits to the pro-China invader like Indonesia, neutral like Vietnam and Malaysia, a low-key and too weak Brunei. This is the carrot and the stick of the Chinese. The Vietnamese learned from the three Indochina wars to be pro-French, pro-American and pro-Soviet. The Philippines will also learn this in the future.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@KrishGupta1290 CCP attacked South Vietnam invader against American Bamboo Curtain and retook territory from 9 dash-line, Battle of Paracel Islands 1974 during Second Indochina War, US navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't condemn that extremely tiny PLA navy then, even when S.Vietnam still should be defended by SEATO 1954-1977.
CCP attacked Viet cong navy expansionist against Soviet's encirclement and retook territory from 9-dash line, Johnson South Reef Skirmish 1988 during Third Indochina War, Soviet red navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't even say one word against relatively weak PLA navy then, even Vietnam should be defended by Soviet-Vietnam Military Treaty 1978-1991.
Did India win 1962 war when both West and Soviet supported Nehru? imperialism is a paper tiger, Modi should know that China is no longer like in 1962, if India wants to contain China again then what if China would also play tougher as revenge? PLA navy warships will definitely be stationed in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives to push back containment from Mod's Foward Policy 2.0.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
there's 153 countries joined BRI, 130 BRI countries leaders, 30 international organization leaders including António Guterres in Beijing now, Putin is meeting so many friendly leaders, it's like Xi hosts a small United Nations in Beijing for Putin, so who isolate who? it will be Global South isolated West.
but why they prefer Chinese debt trap not IMF aid? are those elites stupid than you? Indians are good at talking, so India invented creative propaganda against BRI, then West love and spread it against China, but Xi is a real doer.
well, jealous India, EU and hateful USA know BRI is good that's why they copy and make own, but if you don't really study why Global South choose China, you can never compete with China if based on lies.
when Europe economy shrinks more, they will also join BRI and USA will be only isolated!
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Tejas Mishra Tibet was never sovereign state because Qing Empire or ROC never accepted Tibet independence.
evidence? today Taiwan still claims Tibet and South Tibet in its ROC Constitution, even UK and India never set embassy in Tibet, but India imagined and blamed PRC unification war as invasion, it's like Russia blamed Ukraine to invade Donbass.
Forward Policy is about annex South Tibet then whole Tibet that even British India didn't even annex whole Tibet, India is more aggressive than British India.
Qing Empire, ROC, PRC never accepted McMahon line, it's Tibet separatist agreed with British India, not Chinese central government.
it's like Donbass separatist drew a borderline with Russia but never accepted by Ukraine.
PRC wanted to make compromise with India in McMahon line, but Nehru thought India is more powerful, CCP can't do anything but to accept Nehru's LAC after Chinese great famine.
Mao didn't understand why socialist Nehru so tough with Chinese brother, it's Indian domestic propaganda made PRC as weak, Nehru even warned to defeat PLA and annex more Tibet, so Mao attacked India when Nehru was preparing.
Indian military was weak and easily lost the war, because Nehru looked down Mao even Mao just defeat United Nations in Korean War, so where's Nehru's baseless confidence comes from?
it's same like today Modi still looks down China and plays tough, crossed LAC then got killed as invaders, even Modi admitted Chinese didn't enter Indian territory on LAC side of India.
well, Neville Maxwell's book got banned by india because he revealed truth that it's India betrayed China and tried to force PRC to accept McMahon line.
you can keeps brainwashing yourself and pretend good Colonist, but at least India should fight better.
2
-
2
-
2
-
well, Russian GDP is only 10% of China so Russia can't really help economy of Central Asia, Russia and Central Asian countries are even natural resource rivals in China or Europe market, when Russia military looks not strong as people expected then Central Asia would not be so obedient to big brother, especially Kazakstan also got 19 million Russian minorty like 16% of its population, Kazakstan is worried and turning anti-Russia pro-USA because there's risk that Russia may support their separatism like did in Crimea and Donbass too, Kazakstan need outsider's help to balance and weaken Russia's influence and control, it's either West or China.
China and Central Asia are complementary to each other, China got largest industrial output but only lacks natural resource, that's both Russia and Central Asia should compete to win Chinese market, so if China and Central Asian can cooperate then it's a win-win for both, the problem is can Russia let Central Asia go?
Russia today face serious pressure from Western backyard side in Ukraine, so Russia can't accept South backyard in fire again, if Russia has no ability to keep Central Asia as pro-Russia then Russia need to accept a less worse choice, today Russia only has two option: let West or China to fill that void in Central Asia, surely Russia would rather to give her back to China, because China and Russia shared longest border, if China wants to backstab Russia then China can just attack Russia on Sino-Russian border, Russia can't lose China to back up Russia economically, militarily and strategically under Western sanction and encirclement, let Chinese Belt&Road to link Xinjiang and Moscow through Central Asia, better China than USA.
China, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan recently signed a railway deal, acutally China planned about this deal for 20 years, why it delayed so long time? it's just because Russia let it go, China knew Russia's concern so China never really challenged Russian influence in Central Asia in last 20 years, China didn't really push it to happen and force Russia to accept Chinese influence in Central Asia, but China to let it to happen naturally and keep Russia interests there too.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The Chinese government subsidized all EV brands, including the American brand Tesla in China market, but Biden will only subsidize American car brand which piss off Korean car company, while Americans and Indians are boycotting Chinese goods and investment, the CCP continues to welcome foreign companies especially American investors to make money in the China market, that's when Sino-US relations were still in the highest midst of a trade war, Shanghai welcomes Tesla is because of the catfish effect that the CCP wants, Chinese local brands got pushed into corner after facing fierce competition from Tesla, they have to improve their competitiveness and innovation or die, hundreds of Chinese car brands and their billions of investment just disappeared because they can't compete.
Today, All Americans have no idea, have never seen Chinese brand cars, nobody knows how smart Chinese cars are. because the United States completely refuses Chinese cars to enter the US market. Can other American EV brand compete with Chinese EV brand in the world in the future? Is the United States now more protectionist than CCP? the United States even has rejected Chinese battery companies from setting up battery factories in the United States. Isn't this because American populist politicians are too populist just like Indian politicians? If protectionism could make China rich, then Mao Zedong's China would not be starving, ironically it's Americans taught CCP to open for free trade, market economy.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@RajSingh-md3ps nope, if you check CCP's role in Old Cold War then you will find:
CCP attacked USA in Korean War 1950-1953
CCP armed Vietcong to attack France in First Indochina War 1946-1954
CCP armed all communists against pro-West Bamboo Curtain in Indochina and Africa,
CCP attacked Taiwan in Second Taiwan Strait Crisis 1958-1979
CCP attacked India in Sino-Indian Conflict 1962, 1967
CCP armed North Vietnam to attack USA in Second Indochina War 1955-1975
CCP attacked Soviet in Sino-Soviet border conflict 1969
CCP attacked South Vietnam in Battle of the Paracel Islands 1974
CCP armed all anti-Soviet force against pro-Soviet regimes in Indochina and Africa,
CCP armed Cambodia to attack Vietnam in Cambodian–Vietnamese War 1978-1989
CCP attacked Vietnam in Third Indochina War 1979-1991
CCP attacked Vietnam in Johnson South Reef Skirmish 1988
CCP armd Afghanistan to attack Soviet in Soviet–Afghan War 1979-1989
it's CCP attacked neighbours, or enemies in neighbouring countries, so why US troops appeared near to Chinese border?
why Soviet tried to contain China? why Vietnam wanted to be China's Cuba? CCP won't accept neighbouring regime to join anti-China encirclement.
then CCP has been peaceful rising for 30 years after 1991, because both USA and Russia doesn't contain or encircle China anymore after Cold War ended
so CCP has not got involved in any wars or proxy wars but only focus on economy, still not peaceful or too peaceful?
but USA and Russia was fighting wars in Afghanistan Iraq Georgia Syria Libya Ukraine in last 30 years,
so CCP is peaceful if compared to US and Russia in last 30 years,
so when any regimes to join USA's encirclment against China in Cold War 2.0, then you are teaming up with white Japanese trying to genocide Chinese,
if USA regime-changed Pakistan or North Korea then CCP would attack them too just like Vietcong became pro-Soviet anti-CCP,
peace is for friendly or at least neutral countries, why you choose to be China's Cuba, China's Vietnam, China's Ukraine?
China surely won't remain peaceful if feel threatend, sanctioned, contained, oppressed,
peace is not for imperialists, oppressors, enemies.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I'm sorry to tell you that although I sympathize with Ukraine very much, no matter how Ukrainian neo-Nazis persecuted the Russian minority in Donbas, even the United States also loves to invade much more, but the United States never included foreign territory like Latin American territories in its constitution after WWII. I still think that Russia is an invader according to UN charter, especially since Russia is still annexing Ukrainian territory.
But geopolitics is very cruel. Why I think Russia will not lose? This is not something Putin can decide, but Xi Jinping behind him! Now China does not provide weapons to Russia because China still hopes to remain neutral in order to win the neutrality of the EU, The Russian army seems to have the upper hand now, so Russia will not fail even if it relies on its own military industry, So as long as Putin is willing to continue fighting, then Xi Jinping will be the nanny feeding Russia's war economy. but If NATO really ends up participating in the war, if Russian army really cannot hold NATO troops anymore, then China will provide free weapons to Russia and even send troops to defend Russia.
Just like when North Korea couldn't handle US-led UN force anymore, then China just sent massive troops to defend North Korea. As long as North Vietnam could resist the French and American troops, China will keep sending weapons and food until France and Americans withdrew, So you think the United States can't defeat the Vietnamese? The United States was unable to defeat China and the Soviet Union behind Vietnam in a war of attrition! from China's geopolitical view once Russia loses the war, if Putin steps down and the Russian pro-American party comes to power, Russia will join NATO and contain China from every corner, so Russia is like a huge buffer zone between China and NATO, China won't want to see the U.S.-E.U.-Russian coalition forces will be deployed to Border of Mongolia and Manchuria.
So Ukraine’s enemy is not just Russia, but the China-Russia alliance! NATO need to contain both China and Russia, but they are the world’s largest industrial output country + the world’s largest energy country!
1
-
UN force in Korean War:USA, S.Korea, Australia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Canada, France, the Philippines, Turkey, Thailand, South Africa, Greece, Belgium, Luxembourg, Colombia and Ethiopia provided varying numbers of fighting troops. In addition, Sweden and Denmark each sent a hospital ship, and India, Norway and Italy sent their own field ambulance teams
Anti-communist force in Vietnam War: USA, S.Vietnam, S.Korea, Laos, Khmer, Australia, Thailand, New Zealand, Taiwan, Philippines provided varying numbers of fighting troops.
but why USA failed to deter CCP? why CCP still joins the Korean War and Vietnam War?
both West and Soviet supported India in 1962, why CCP still attacked India then?
If the country you mentioned really sends troops, the PLA will definitely join the war, because this is a war invitation letter to China to break the siege.
Do you think that if Chinese and Russian troops land in Cuba or Mexico, the United States will send troops, or kowtow?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Nigerians and the colonists are fighting over the ownership of Niger's uranium mines and gold mines, because most Nigerian natural resources exported to EU especially France,
people still don't know why Australia is rich but Niger is starving? because Niger as country is rich but Nigerians as humans are poor, why?
because the corrupt puppet regime sold expensive raw material to other countries too cheaply, because local people never controls the profit from export,
but Autralia, Canada, Russia, Saudi Arabia controls profit of raw material export and use profit on own people's benefit, so why Niger can't do like that?
Niger and other African countries fell into typical trap of neo-colonialism, although everyone knows Niger is an independent sovereign country in the United Nations for decades,
but it is not independent in terms of finance, economy, military, media and politics, former colonists allowed African countries' sovereignty not because they felt guilty,
it's because they wanted to reduce the local's resistance to the old-colonialism, then locals can naively and obediently enjoy freedom and democracy from neo-colonialism next decades,
the locals should kneel down and beg to the former colonists and said: don’t be like vampires please leave some bones for the locals,
or fight for your real freedom and human rights, STARVING IS NOT DEMOCRACY!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alexanderchambord9850 treaty? a treaty without strength and determination is nothing.
CCP attacked Soviet in 1969 even "Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship, Alliance and Mutual Assistance(1950–1979)" has not expired yet, aka Sino-Soviet Conflicts 1969,
the Sino-Soviet military treaty signed since Korean War, CCP Soviet were blood allies in Korean War and Vietnam War, but why communist allies can't kill each other?
you think CCP really care about treaty if Soviet tried to control CCP as satellite state? Fk it, don't try to kidnap CCP with a piece of paper like USA did in Europe Japan.
CCP kept sponsoring Vietcong against South Vietnam for 29 years until Western troops withdrew, it's First Indochina War and Vietnam War,
CCP clearly attacked South Vietnam in Paracel island battle in 1974,
that's when South Vietnam should be protected by "Southeast Asia Treaty Organization(1954–1977)",
This is Southeast Asia’s version of NATO, right? but The U.S. Navy in Cam Ranh Bay did not help the South Vietnamese Navy,
but only expressed very neutral and useless concerns against CCP!
Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty(1955–1980), actually it's USA and ROC Taiwan military treaty against CCP,
When CCP bombarded Taiwan-controlled Kinmen in 1958, and even got US officers were killed, why did the US military not attack PLA in mainland China?
when Soviet and Vietcong signed "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics-Socialist Republic of Viet Nam: Treaty of Friendship and Co-Operation" in 1978,
CCP just attacked Vietcong in 1979, sponsored Khmer Rouge against Vietcong occupiers,
CCP kept attacking on Vietnam border until Vietnam withdrew from Cambodia 1991, aka Third Indochina War,
even attacked Vietcong navy in Johnson South Reef in 1988, The Soviet Navy in Cam Ranh Bay did not even condemn the CCP!
Why did Mao Zedong say that imperialism is a paper tiger? Of course he tested this through the war.
There is a high probability that the United States will not defend the Philippines, even USA can defend but USA can do like defended South Vietnam for 29 years?
1
-
@juzanewbie6194 Since the CCP knows about a century of national humiliation, and you also know that the CCP knows about a century of national humiliation, do you still use a century of national humiliation to test or threaten the CCP? Then the CCP would fight the war to the end. Otherwise, why do you think the CCP went to war with the United States and the Soviet Union in the last Cold War? the CCP attacked India in 1962, the CCP armed Vietcong against USA in 1964, the CCP attacked the Soviet Union in 1969, At that time, the PRC was just an agricultural country poorer than Africa, but the CCP was confronting in Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam, India, and the Soviet Union at the same time. Today, the industrial output value of the PRC is that of the United States, Japan, and Germany combined. Then you should use the Nanjing Massacre to stimulate the CCP, so that the CCP will be more retaliatory, Because China's right-wing people very much hope that Japan will participate in the Taiwan War, is there any better excuse than this to retaliate for the Tokyo Massacre?
1
-
CCP attacked South Vietnam invader against American Bamboo Curtain and retook territory from 9 dash-line, Battle of Paracel Islands 1974 during Second Indochina War, US navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't condemn that extremely tiny PLA navy then, even when S.Vietnam still should be defended by SEATO 1954-1977.
CCP attacked Viet cong navy expansionist against Soviet's encirclement and retook territory from 9-dash line, Johnson South Reef Skirmish 1988 during Third Indochina War, Soviet red navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't even say one word against relatively weak PLA navy then, even Vietnam should be defended by Soviet-Vietnam Military Treaty 1978-1991.
Did India win 1962 war when both West and Soviet supported Nehru? imperialism is a paper tiger, Modi should know that China is no longer like in 1962, if India wants to contain China again then what if China would also play tougher as revenge? PLA navy warships will definitely be stationed in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives to push back containment from Mod's Foward Policy 2.0.
1
-
1
-
the great reconciliation typhoon of Muslims between Persians and Arabs, the balance of the three kingdoms was broken, Israel felt extremely lonely and threatened, afraid being just huge Gaza-like prison among muslim world, Under pressure from China the far-right Netanyahu can choose to reconcile with muslims or suffer horrific retaliation from neighours, Netanyahu even made Biden dissatisfied with him because of his power centralization and extreme right-wing, so he wanted to visit China to discuss balance of Israel, but clearly Israel is the only one rejecting reconciliation monthes, then such accident by Hamas will be a spontaneous small quik storm because Hamas can't wait, Although China only recognizes Fatah and has never had any contact with Hamas, it does not regard Hamas as a terrorist organization. Since Israel has been encircled, China can take advantage of this opportunity to hit USA where she hurts, Because Israel is not Ukraine or Taiwan, Israel is as important as Japan or Cuba, The United States was very smart and did not jump into the Ukraine trap, and China was also careful to avoid the Taiwan trap. But once the United States fell into the Israeli trap, wouldn't China be able to attack Taiwan and tell Russia to smash Ukraine?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
UN force in Korean War:USA, S.Korea, Australia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Canada, France, the Philippines, Turkey, Thailand, South Africa, Greece, Belgium, Luxembourg, Colombia and Ethiopia provided varying numbers of fighting troops. In addition, Sweden and Denmark each sent a hospital ship, and India, Norway and Italy sent their own field ambulance teams
Anti-communist force in Vietnam War: USA, S.Vietnam, S.Korea, Laos, Khmer, Australia, Thailand, New Zealand, Taiwan, Philippines provided varying numbers of fighting troops.
but why USA failed to deter CCP? why CCP still joins the Korean War and Vietnam War?
both West and Soviet supported India in 1962, why CCP still attacked India then?
If the country you mentioned really sends troops, the PLA will definitely join the war, because this is a war invitation letter to China to break the siege.
Do you think that if Chinese and Russian troops land in Cuba or Mexico, the United States will send troops, or kowtow?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
keep China in check? what if China also keep your country and allies in check?
You must know about the anti-Soviet Iron Curtain, but have you heard about the anti-CCP Bamboo Curtain in Cold War?
It's Western anti-CCP group 1950-1979: South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, British Hong Kong, Portuguese Macau, Philippines, South Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Kingdom of Laos, Kingdom of Cambodia, Kingdom of Thailand, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Kingdom of Bhutan, India, Pakistan, and of course and anti-CCP NATO, Australia, New Zealand, etc.
There are also Soviet's anti-Chinese encirclement after Sino-Soviet split since 1959,
It's Soviet's anti-Chinese group 1959-1989: the Soviet Union, Mongolia, Afghanistan, India, Vietnam, Laos, and anti-Chinese Eastern Europe, Yugoslavia, Cuba, etc.
What I mean is that the United States and the Soviet Union were very happy when they successfully formed anti-PRC containment. They thought that this would be able to isolate, sanction, block, threaten, deter the CCP. It was indeed super suffocating to get contained by both the capitalist world and socialist world led by the United States and the Soviet Union simultaneously from 1960-1980 for 20 years, but nobody remember what was the CCP’s response to such threat?
CCP attacked USA-led United Nations force imperialists, Korean War 1950-1953 after massive UN troops landed in Korea as Bamboo Curtain, PRC pushed back USA and defended N.Korea's independence.
CCP armed Viet Cong against monarchy in South Vietnam and France colonist against Bamboo Curtain, First Indochina War 1946-1954, PRC defended N.Vietnam independence and France withrew.
CCP exported communist revolution to Third World like Cuba Angola during 1950-1979, PRC overthrew colonial or junta/dictatorship regime in Vietanm Cambodia Laos and broke through Bamboo Curtain.
CCP attacked pro-West right-wing ROC dicatorship in Taiwan against Bamboo Curtain, First Taiwan Strait Crisis 1954, PRC gained most coastal islands from pro-USA Chinese collaborationist puppet.
CCP humiliated USA expansionist by bombing puppet regime Taiwan's Kinmen for 21 years against Bamboo Curtain, Second Taiwan Strait Crisis 1958-1979, when ROC should be defended by Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty 1955-1979.
CCP armed N.Vietnam and sent combat engineer troops against USA imperialist and pro-USA Vietnamese collaborationist in Bamboo Curtain, Vietnam War 1955-1975 after massive anti-communist troops landed in Vietnam, when S.Vietnam should be defended by Southeast Asia Treaty Organization treaty.
CCP removed 2dashline from 11dashline in 1957 after Mao giving Bach Long Vi island to pro-CCP N.Vietnam Ho Chi Minh for monitoring USA econnaissance aircraft, Viet Cong officially supported PRC's 9dashline during Vietnam War then.
CCP withdrew PLA troops after Western occupation force retreated and Vietnam reunified, SEATO 1954-1977 failed to deter and contain PRC and Communism, West failed to protect Western dictator puppet in S.Vietnam as Bamboo Curtain.
CCP suppressed pro-West, pro-India, CIA-trained Tibetan separatists against Bamboo Curtain, Tibetan armed rebellion 1959, All the traitors were wiped out, the slave owner Dalai Lama in exile in India until today, Dalai Lama lost influence after Tibet's per capita GDP is higher than any Indian state.
CCP attacked USA-backed and Soviet-backed India expansionist against Bamboo Curtain, 1962 and 1967. India gave up Forward Policy into Tibet, depressed Nehru eventually died after humiliated defeat and political infight, Despite the support from the United States and the Soviet Union, India lost its chance to rise due to China.
CCP suppressed pro-Soviet, NED-fund Uyghur separatists, Xinjiang rebellion 1962-2016, no more terrorist attacks after re-education internment camp and poverty alleviation, Uighur tradition liberated from Wahhabism's burqa persecution, BRI is linking Central Asia and Europe through Xinjiang.
CCP intervened in the Portuguese Macau anti-colonial revolution 1966 against Bamboo Curtain, Portugal lost control, pro-ROC activists lost influence, there's no more colonial mindset in prosperous Macau.
CCP intervened in British Hong Kong anti-colonial revolution 1967 against Bamboo Curtain, colonial regime suppressed Hongkong demonstrators' freedom and democratic rights, colonized Hongkongers only got liberated after 2019 pro-colonial riot.
CCP attacked Soviet revisionist against Soviet's encirclement and caused nuke crisis, Sino-Soviet conflict 1969, Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship and Alliance 1950-1979 became useless.
Mao-Nixon reconciliation in 1972, because Mao Zedong has regarded the Brezhnev Doctrine as a social imperialsit, a greater threat as neighbor country than the United States on Chinese border, Sino-USA honeymoon was not about value or ideology but geopolitics, because Mao Zedong was ultra-leftIst during Cultural Revolution era but Nixon was right-wing anti-communist in 1970s.
CCP attacked South Vietnam invader and retook territory from 9 dash-line, Battle of Paracel Islands 1974, US navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't condemn extremely tiny PLA navy then even when S.Vietnam still should be defended by SEATO 1954-1977.
CCP-Viet Cong hostility since 1976, when Vietcong broke promise and inherited South Vietnam's claim in South China Sea, Le Duan expelled and genociding Chinese minority aka BOAT PEOPLE and invading disputed border territories in 1978.
Viet Cong-Khmer Rouge hostility 1977, because Viet Cong already controlled Laos politics then tried to control Cambodian politics, Le Duan tried to 'unify' entire Indochina Peninsula by force with Soviet's help, then Khmer Rouge chose to fight the Viet Cong pressure first.
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics-Socialist Republic of Viet Nam: Treaty of Friendship and Co-Operation signed in 1978-1991.
Afghanistan-Union of Soviet Socialist Republics: Treaty of Friendship, Goodneighborliness and Cooperation signed in 1978-1991.
Deng Xiaoping considered Soviet's military influence in Vietnam and Afghanistan as anti-Chinese encirclement, then CCP's foreign policy and ideology became more pro-West and liberal, Deng visited ASEAN and the United States to isolate the Viet Cong before war.
CCP launched one-month 'de-Nazification, de-Industrialization, de-Agriculture, De-Infrastructure' military operation, kept attacking pro-Soviet Viet Cong expansionist against Soviet's encirclement, Sino-Vietnamese conflicts 1979–1991, when Vietnam should be defended by Soviet-Vietnamese Treaty since 1978.
CCP attacked invader Viet cong navy against Soviet's encirclement, Johnson South Reef Skirmish 1988, Soviet red navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't even say one word against relatively weak PLA navy then.
CCP armd pro-China Khmer Rouge guerrilla against Viet Cong occupation and Soviet's encirclement, Third Indochina War 1975-1991, PRC defended Cambodia and Laos independence until Vietnam invader withdrew and giving up 'French Indochina Federation under Vietnam rule' dream.
CCP armed mujihideen against Soviet social imperialist's occupation and Soviet's encirclement, Soviet Afghanistan War 1979-1989, when Afghanistan should be defended by Soviet-Afghan Treaty since 1978.
Also CCP exported anti-Soviet revolution in many proxy wars during 1969-1991 like Ogaden War, Rhodesian Bush War, Angolan Civil War, Mozambican Civil War, Eritrean War of Independence, Dhofar Rebellion, Bangladesh Liberation War, Angolan Civil War, Ethiopian Civil War, Afghan Civil War, Insurgency in Laos, Insurgency in Northeast India, Balochistan conflict, Cabinda War, Naxalite–Maoist insurgency, Insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir etc, it's all about PRC wanted to weaken Soviet's encirclement.
1
-
CCP attacked South Vietnam invader against American Bamboo Curtain and retook territory from 9 dash-line, Battle of Paracel Islands 1974 during Second Indochina War, US navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't condemn that extremely tiny PLA navy then, even when S.Vietnam still should be defended by SEATO 1954-1977.
CCP attacked Viet cong navy expansionist against Soviet's encirclement and retook territory from 9-dash line, Johnson South Reef Skirmish 1988 during Third Indochina War, Soviet red navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't even say one word against relatively weak PLA navy then, even Vietnam should be defended by Soviet-Vietnam Military Treaty 1978-1991.
Did India win 1962 war when both West and Soviet supported Nehru? imperialism is a paper tiger, Modi should know that China is no longer like in 1962, if India wants to contain China again then what if China would also play tougher as revenge? PLA navy warships will definitely be stationed in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives to push back containment from Mod's Foward Policy 2.0.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@zeffy7192 treaty? a treaty without strength and determination is nothing.
CCP attacked Soviet in 1969 even "Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship, Alliance and Mutual Assistance(1950–1979)" has not expired yet, aka Sino-Soviet Conflicts 1969,
the Sino-Soviet military treaty signed since Korean War, CCP Soviet were blood allies in Korean War and Vietnam War, but why communist allies can't kill each other?
you think CCP really care about treaty if Soviet tried to control CCP as satellite state? Fk it, don't try to kidnap CCP with a piece of paper like USA did in Europe Japan.
CCP kept sponsoring Vietcong against South Vietnam for 29 years until Western troops withdrew, it's First Indochina War and Vietnam War,
CCP clearly attacked South Vietnam in Paracel island battle in 1974, that's when South Vietnam should be protected by "Southeast Asia Treaty Organization(1954–1977)",
This is Southeast Asia’s version of NATO, right? but The U.S. Navy in Cam Ranh Bay did not help the South Vietnamese Navy,
but only expressed very neutral and useless concerns against CCP!
Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty(1955–1980), actually it's USA and ROC Taiwan military treaty against CCP,
When CCP bombarded Taiwan-controlled Kinmen in 1958, and even got US officers were killed, why did the US military not attack PLA in mainland China?
when Soviet and Vietcong signed "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics-Socialist Republic of Viet Nam: Treaty of Friendship and Co-Operation" in 1978,
CCP just attacked Vietcong in 1979, sponsored Khmer Rouge against Vietcong occupiers,
CCP kept attacking on Vietnam border until Vietnam withdrew from Cambodia 1991, aka Third Indochina War,
even attacked Vietcong navy in Johnson South Reef in 1988, The Soviet Navy in Cam Ranh Bay did not even condemn the CCP!
Why did Mao Zedong say that imperialism is a paper tiger? Of course he tested this through the war.
There is a high probability that the United States will not defend the Philippines, but even USA can defend but USA can do like defended South Vietnam for 29 years?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Good News: USA decided to contain China's trade and it's easy to win!
Bad News: China overtaken Germany as No.1 surplus country..
Good News: China said Trade War would hurt both especially China!
Bad News: Americans suffered much more from inflation than Chinese..
Good News: USA kidnapped Huawei's daughter even sanctioned all Chinese tech!
Bad News: ASEAN, Muslim world, Africa Union, Latin America are embracing Huawei...
Good News: China said decoupling is not good for China economy, world economy!
Bad News: communist China is trying to be leader for Free Trade and Market Economy..
Good News: G7 talked about decoupling against China!
Bad News: China is de-risking with West but coupling with 140+ Belt&Road countries through more FTAs..
Good News: USA decided to wage full-scale chip war against China!
Bad News: China is planning to build complete chip industry chain like built own space station...
Good News:iPhone sales is much better than Huawei in the world now!
Bad News: China just made 7nm chip and 14nm chip under mass production..
Goold News: foreign company is leaving to Vietnam and India!
Bad News:American and European capitalists visit China and bring more high-end industrial FDI..
Good News: Western, Korean, Japanese company is leaving Russia!
Bad News: Chinese company fill the vacuum of Russia market..
Good News: Finland Sweden is joining NATO!
Bad News: Iran joined SCO, Belarus, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, UAE, Egypt, Turkey, Syria, Sri Lanka, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Nepal, Myanmar, Cambodia on waiting list..
Good News: USA is arming Taiwan!
Bad News: China is planning to arm Russia..
Good News: USA sent some troops to Taiwan!
Bad News: China is planning military expansion in Cuba..
Good News: USA forced S.Korea Japan Taiwan and Netherlands to join chip technology embargo against China!
Bad News: China banned chip production raw material like gallium and germanium export..
Good News: Even China does not export gallium but other countries still can export it!
Bad News: the second largest exporter is Russia..
Good News: but the third largest exporter is Ukraine!
Bad News: Ukrainian gallium is mainly produced in Zaporozhye and Donbass..
1
-
1
-
1
-
I finally realized why Gordon Chang is still on American TV show after 20 years 'China Collapsing' propaganda, just look at enormous clickbaits of every video on this or other channel,
then you know people extremely enjoy such biased, exaggerated fakenews not reality and facts, it became big FORTUNE for both Gordon and media,
remember what's last enormous 'China Collapsing' story? Evergrande, not long time ago right? but there is new propaganda products come out everyday on your table,
such so-called Free Media doesn't guarantee your independent thinking, even worse and ironic they pretended like 'free, objective, honest' media to brainwash people in Free World,
because they know you subconsciously want China to fail, you think you don't need to increase your competitiveness to defeat your opponent?
Whether the elephant will attack you, it depends not on what you wish, but it depends how strong you are, or how elephant's mood today,
many people have never been to China, can't speak a word of Chinese, but they have a sense of superiority and pretend that they are China Expert,
Have you ever seen a Chinese who does not understand English and has never been to the USA but claiming to be an USA Expert?
some countries are too busy with wishing China to fail, rather than busy with improving themselves..all of sudden it's US economy collapsed before CCP in 2008 wallstreet crisis,
most ironically, it's China bailed out world economy especially USA, Australia, Canada through 2008–09 Chinese economic stimulus plan,
suddenly US politicians waked up and realized China won't collapse naturally, then they made bigger and bigger CHINA THREAT propaganda, like enormous Xinjiang Genocide story..
so it means they admitted previous 'CHINA COLLAPSING' story proves FAKE, right? then who really covered up China's rise by faking up news to calm down US politicians?
Why is China's strategy of 'hide his ambitions and disguise its claws' successful? Because there are hundreds of millions of people like Gordon Chang in USA,
such media and Gordon don't feel ashamed of their dishonest report last 20 years? people don't feel ashamed to keep Gordon on TV show?
that's why Chinese netizens joked Gordon should be awarded a medal for his patriotism(to China not USA) for his inside job,
because it's Gordon not CCP mouthpiece newspaper, successfully brainwashed all American elites and people, help China to avoid being contained by the USA in 2001,
if USA could foresee China's possible potential 20 years ago, then Trump's Trade War will be much much easier to win in 2021,
would those Free media and most anti-China activist Gordon be responsible for cover up CCP's rise? nope, he is still on TV but selling his new ‘CHINA THREAT’ propaganda product,
Gordon can always lead Bad China propaganda, but now the trend is 'CHINA THREAT' not 'CHINA COLLAPSE', this channel should follow Gordon's new trend.
it's new narrative to make huge money!
1
-
1
-
Linux-user since PRC was born in 1949, not because CCP loves Palestine because they are muslims, but because anti-colonial anti-imperialist left-wing communist party always loves oppressed Third World, just like socialist Nehru loves Third World too, so can you get educated before talk?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
China–Palestine relations, also referred to as Sino–Palestinian relations, encompasses the long bilateral relationship between China and Palestine dating back from the early years of the Cold War.
During the era of Mao Zedong, China's foreign policy was in support of Third World national liberation movements, with China extending support towards the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). In this period, China supported both Fatah, and smaller militant organizations such as the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) and the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP). In the post-Mao era, China continued to support the PLO in international forums, though it dropped its support for militant organizations. China has recognized the State of Palestine since 1988. Since 1992, China also established formal diplomatic relations with Israel and has maintained a cordial relationship with both entities.
Palestinian leaders Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas have both visited China in official capacities, and relations between the two countries has been considered as cordial. China does not consider Hamas ruling the Gaza Strip as a terrorist organization, and officially supports the creation of a "sovereign and independent Palestinian state" based on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital.
1
-
Linux-user After the victory of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the People's Republic of China (PRC) was proclaimed under CCP chairman Mao Zedong. The PRC recognized the State of Israel, but during the 1950s and 1960s, the PRC began to support the Arabs and Palestinians.
During the 1960s the PRC had strongly supported the destruction of Israel and its replacement with a Palestinian Arab State. Mao Zedong linked the existence of Israel to Taiwan, and described them as "bases of imperialism in Asia."The PRC strongly supported Yasser Arafat and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), providing arms and training.[1] China had also established close relations with the Fatah party as well. The CCP also supported Palestinian armed groups such as the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) as well as the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP). The PLO established a diplomatic office in China in May 1965.After the PRC was admitted to the United Nations as a member in 1971, it continued to support the Palestinian cause. An embassy of the PLO was opened in Beijing during the summer of 1974.
The PRC supported UN General Assembly Resolution 3379 which had equated Zionism with racism in 1975.The resolution, however, was later revoked with Resolution 4686 in 1991, a vote for which China was absent.
After the death of Mao Zedong in 1976 and the gradual rise of Deng Xiaoping to power. China reduced support for Palestinian militant groups, eventually cutting off support, and later supported the Camp David Accords in 1978. The PRC still supported the Palestinians and their cause, albeit in a more limited fashion, and it strongly supported the 1988 Palestinian Declaration of Independence by Yasser Arafat in Algiers, Algeria despite the objections by both Israel and the United States. The PRC recognised the new State of Palestine on 20 November 1988 and had established full diplomatic relations with it by the end of 1989.
China has assigned formal diplomatic staff to Palestine since 1990. Initially diplomatic affairs were conducted through the Chinese embassy in Tunisia. In December 1995, China has established a foreign office located in the Gaza Strip that acted as a de facto embassy and liaison office to the Palestinian Liberation Organization; however, the Ambassador to Tunisia continued to act as the main diplomatic officer to Palestine until 2008. In May 2004, the office, officially named Office of the People's Republic of China to the State of Palestine, was moved to Ramallah. The director of the office is accorded ambassadorial ranks in the Chinese foreign service.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@isshiomi6364 so you think Chinese is spineless, and kowtow to USA?
UN force in Korean War:USA, S.Korea, Australia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Canada, France, the Philippines, Turkey, Thailand, South Africa, Greece, Belgium, Luxembourg, Colombia and Ethiopia provided varying numbers of fighting troops. In addition, Sweden and Denmark each sent a hospital ship, and India, Norway and Italy sent their own field ambulance teams
Anti-communist force in Vietnam War: USA, S.Vietnam, S.Korea, Laos, Khmer, Australia, Thailand, New Zealand, Taiwan, Philippines provided varying numbers of fighting troops.
but why USA failed to deter CCP? why CCP still joined the Korean War and Vietnam War?
both West and Soviet supported India in 1962, why CCP still attacked India then?
If the country you mentioned really sends troops, the PLA will definitely join the war, because this is a war invitation letter to China to break the siege.
Do you think that if Chinese and Russian troops land in Cuba or Mexico, the United States will send troops, or kowtow?
1
-
@angeloarquiza2023 Deng Xiaoping visited Thailand, Malaysia, and Singapore in 1978 for isolating the Viet Cong. After Deng Xiaoping returned from the United States, he invaded North Vietnam, sponsored mujahideen against Soviet.
Recently, China is conducting military exercises with six ASEAN countries, and Xi Jinping visited Vietnam. It seems that the Vietnamese have learned lessons from the previous three pro-France, pro-American, and pro-Soviet proxy wars, But the ignorant Filipinos have no idea how dangerous they are. They really think that the US-Philippines alliance treaty can deter the CCP. Wasn't South Vietnam not in SEATO at that time?
China will give low-end industries, the Chinese market, and infrastructure to Vietnam, and China will give brutal war to the Philippines as an example to serve as a warning to others. This is China's carrot and stick to neighboring countries, Asia's Monroe Doctrine.the Philippines will become the Cuba of Asia, another Vietnam, the new Ukraine, the battlefield of the Fourth Indochina War.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Deterrent factor? well, why West failed to deter CCP in Korean War and Vietnam War??
CCP attacked South Vietnam invader against American Bamboo Curtain and retook territory from 9 dash-line, Battle of Paracel Islands 1974 during Second Indochina War, US navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't condemn that extremely tiny PLA navy then, even when S.Vietnam still should be defended by SEATO 1954-1977.
CCP attacked Viet cong navy expansionist against Soviet's encirclement and retook territory from 9-dash line, Johnson South Reef Skirmish 1988 during Third Indochina War, Soviet red navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't even say one word against relatively weak PLA navy then, even Vietnam should be defended by Soviet-Vietnam Military Treaty 1978-1991.
Did India win 1962 war when both West and Soviet supported Nehru? imperialism is a paper tiger, Modi should know that China is no longer like in 1962, if India wants to contain China again then what if China would also play tougher as revenge? PLA navy warships will definitely be stationed in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives to push back containment from Mod's Foward Policy 2.0.
1
-
@അജാതശത്രു You actually have the nerve to say that others have no knowledge? You, India, proposed a forward policy towards Tibet and forced China to accept the colonial McMahon Line. It was India that stabbed China in the back!
The PLA has fought against Japanese fascists, Kuomintang dictators, Tibetan rebels, United Nations forces, Indian Army, Soviet Army, South Vietnamese Navy, and Vietnamese Army and navy. Do you have combat experience against the United States and the Soviet Union?
You still don't know why China retaliated against your aggression and are still immersed in self-absorbed false history.
If you have the guts, read the book banned in India, INDIA'S CHINA WAR by (Neville Maxwell)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Chinese claimed the South China Sea in 1945. The United States and the Soviet Union asked ROC to take over the South China Sea islands after Japan retreated. In 1946, the US military lent eight warships to ROC to effectively control Taiping Island, Thitu Island, Triton Island, and Woody Island. The Kuomintang claimed the 11-dash line in 1947, and Taiwan still claims the 11-dash line today. The PRC fully inherited the ROC's claims after 1949.
So why doesn’t the US let the Filipinos take over the South China Sea? Because all Southeast Asian countries are colonies, and ROC was only sovereign and independent country. Because KMT/CCP had been fighting Japan on their own from 1931 to 1945, and all Southeast Asian countries surrendered in 1942.
The order can only be rewritten after the war. Therefore, the United States and the Soviet Union gave the South China Sea to the Chinese as a trophy of war because the Chinese wiped out more Japanese troops. if the United States deliberately forgets that this is the order of World War II they aggreed, the Philippines should fight to win the Fourth Indochina War, the United States should win the PRC in the World War III, The Chinese relied on tens of thousands of tons of blood to achieve the order of World War II. but you want to rely on a piece of paper, or with the help of Western media propaganda war in English? or just change of name?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hijodelsoldeoriente Taiwan keeps a low profile not only because of its own inability, but also because the Democratic Progressive Party is a pro-American party for Taiwan independence. However, Taiwan still controls Taiping Island and Dongsha Island today. You'd better check how far they are from Taiwan.
So when you blame the CCP for being too ambitious in the South China Sea, it is because Taiwan’s military capabilities are too weak, not because Taiwan does not want to, or I can say that the CCP is not tough enough, because if the CCP today ignores the relationship with Malaysia, Indonesia, Brunei and even Vietnam relationship, the CCP can take back all the islands in the South China Sea.
Then you would naturally say that the CCP did not dare to go to war because of the presence of the US military. However, when the CCP and South Vietnam fought in the Paracels in 1974, the US military did not help its allies fight the then weak PLA navy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ravishing-troop5276 fxxk your the mutual defense treaty. When did the CCP really care about the military treaty from the United States and the Soviet Union during the last Cold War? you don't know because you are uneducated about history and geopolitics,
CCP humiliated USA expansionist by bombing puppet regime Taiwan's Kinmen for 21 years against Bamboo Curtain, Second Taiwan Strait Crisis 1958-1979, when ROC Taiwan should be defended by Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty 1955-1979.
CCP armed N.Vietnam and sent combat engineer troops against USA imperialist and pro-USA Vietnamese collaborationist in Bamboo Curtain, Vietnam War 1955-1975 after massive anti-communist troops landed in Vietnam, when S.Vietnam should be defended by Southeast Asia Treaty Organization treaty.
CCP even attacked Soviet revisionist against Soviet's encirclement and caused nuke crisis, Sino-Soviet conflict 1969, Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship and Alliance 1950-1979 became a piece of waste paper.
CCP directly attacked South Vietnam invader and retook territory from 9 dash-line, Battle of Paracel Islands 1974, US navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't condemn extremely tiny PLA navy then even when S.Vietnam still should be defended by SEATO 1954-1977.
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics-Socialist Republic of Viet Nam: Treaty of Friendship and Co-Operation signed in 1978-1991.
Afghanistan-Union of Soviet Socialist Republics: Treaty of Friendship, Goodneighborliness and Cooperation signed in 1978-1991.
CCP launched one-month 'de-Nazification, de-Industrialization, de-Agriculture, De-Infrastructure' military operation, kept attacking pro-Soviet Viet Cong expansionist against Soviet's encirclement, Sino-Vietnamese conflicts 1979–1991, when Vietnam should be defended by Soviet-Vietnamese Treaty since 1978.
CCP attacked invader Viet cong navy against Soviet's encirclement, Johnson South Reef Skirmish 1988, Soviet red navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't even say one word against relatively weak PLA navy then, when Vietnam should be defended by Soviet-Vietnamese Treaty since 1978.
CCP armd pro-China Khmer Rouge guerrilla against Viet Cong occupation and Soviet's encirclement, Third Indochina War 1975-1991, PRC defended Cambodia and Laos independence until Vietnam invader withdrew and giving up 'French Indochina Federation under Vietnam rule' dream.
CCP armed mujihideen against Soviet social imperialist's occupation and Soviet's encirclement, Soviet Afghanistan War 1979-1989, when Afghanistan should be defended by Soviet-Afghan Treaty since 1978.
China borders 14 countries on land, including North Korea, Russia, Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, Laos and Vietnam. Why did the CCP attack South Korea, South Vietnam, India, the Soviet Union, and Vietnam? Why doesn’t CCP attack weak Mongolia, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, and Laos? Why does the CCP attack regimes that are extremely pro-American and anti-communist, as well as regimes that are extremely pro-Soviet and anti-China? Because as China’s neighbors, they believed in foreign powers and gave up their neutral attitude to join the military encirclement network of the United States and the Soviet Union. Because their people and politicians believed the propaganda, overestimated the United States and the Soviet Union, and underestimated CCP. So they have to pay the price for their ignorance, just like Cuba, Georgia and Ukraine.
As a neighbor of a big country, but colluding with another big country to threaten its neighbors, this may not have a deterrent effect, but an effect of inviting war. A piece of paper cannot protect a small country, only smart diplomacy can protect a small country. childish and ignorant diplomacy can turn a small country into a battlefield for a brutal proxy war!
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm sorry to tell you that although I sympathize with Ukraine very much, no matter how Ukrainian neo-Nazis persecuted the Russian minority in Donbas, even the United States also loves to invade much more, but the United States never included foreign territory like Latin American territories in its constitution after WWII. I still think that Russia is an invader according to UN charter, especially since Russia is still annexing Ukrainian territory.
But geopolitics is very cruel. Why I think Russia will not lose? This is not something Putin can decide, but Xi Jinping behind him! Now China does not provide weapons to Russia because China still hopes to remain neutral in order to win the neutrality of the EU, The Russian army seems to have the upper hand now, so Russia will not fail even if it relies on its own military industry, So as long as Putin is willing to continue fighting, then Xi Jinping will be the nanny feeding Russia's war economy. but If NATO really ends up participating in the war, if Russian army really cannot hold NATO troops anymore, then China will provide free weapons to Russia and even send troops to defend Russia.
Just like when North Korea couldn't handle US-led UN force anymore, then China just sent massive troops to defend North Korea. As long as North Vietnam could resist the French and American troops, China will keep sending weapons and food until France and Americans withdrew, So you think the United States can't defeat the Vietnamese? The United States was unable to defeat China and the Soviet Union behind Vietnam in a war of attrition! from China's geopolitical view once Russia loses the war, if Putin steps down and the Russian pro-American party comes to power, Russia will join NATO and contain China from every corner, so Russia is like a huge buffer zone between China and NATO, China won't want to see the U.S.-E.U.-Russian coalition forces will be deployed to Border of Mongolia and Manchuria.
So Ukraine’s enemy is not just Russia, but the China-Russia alliance! NATO need to contain both China and Russia, but they are the world’s largest industrial output country + the world’s largest energy country!
1
-
Of course, China does not want to unify Taiwan by force, because the CCP believes that time is on China's side. Maybe in ten years, when China's technology and economy surpass the United States, then Taiwan will be more willing to accept one country, two systems, because human nature is to respect the strong. If Taiwan still refuses to reunify, so the cost for China to reunify by force will be even smaller.
It is indeed possible for China to attack Taiwan when the economy is in a downturn, such as by being tough against the outsiders to divert inner problems, but China is not a democratic country, and Xi Jinping does not need votes. Since the CCP can suppress dissatisfied people, why does the CCP want to seek people support through war? ?
I think whether CCP will go to war still depends on the attitude of the United States and Taiwan. The United States has been testing the edges of China's Taiwan issue. Recent news has said that the US military has landed in Kinmen, which is only 10 kilometers away from the Chinese city, so if China feels Don't be surprised if you need revenge.
1
-
1
-
1
-
You are really ignorant of history. The China you are talking about is the Republic of China, which is now ROC Taiwan today.
Because British India, British Burma, the Russian Empire, the Japanese Empire, and French Vietnam once encroached on the territory of the Qing Empire, but the Qing government was too corrupt and weak to take it back until collapse.
Later, the ROC established by Sun Yat-sen inherited all the territorial claims of the Qing Dynasty, but ROC immediately fell into three decades of wars with warlords, Japanese and communists, so Kuomingtang could not regain it until got kicked to Taiwan 1949, so those disputed/lost territory since Qing Empire is still claimed by Taiwan on its ROC constituion.
After 1949, the PRC also inherited the territory of the ROC. Because too long time had passed, it was impossible for the CCP to go to war with all surrounding countries to regain its past territories. Therefore, the CCP and
Because of the Korean War and the Sino-Soviet split, the CCP was contained by both USA and Soviet allies. At that time, the CCP was not so strong that it could go to war with all surrounding countries, so the PRC made some compromises, PRC made compromises on borderline with Myanmar, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, Vietnam, Tajikistan, settled the land border disputes through friendly negotiations, and the land borders were only India and Bhutan controlled by India. The Qing government, the ROC government never recognized the McMahon Line, and India Inheriting the colonial legacy, Nehru's refusal to make any concessions led to the 1962 war and the Sino-Indian hostility to this day. Of course, the ROC Taiwan refused to recognize any agreements between the PRC and other countries, Therefore, today Taiwan has territorial disputes with all surrounding countries on ROC constituion.
What remains is the dispute in the South China Sea. Today, Taiwan still claims the 11-dash line, but Beijing changed from the 11-dash line to claiming the 9-dash line in 1957, because the CCP gave Bach Long Vi Island as a gift to North Vietnam to monitor the South Vietnam or American reconnaissance aircraft in 1957, considering that the Viet Cong has become pro-American again today, the CCP must regret its generosity back then.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@yashvanthreddy5227 when Indians said Indian economy is much smaller than China, because China liberalize market in 1978 but India only liberalize market in 1991, it's 13 years later than China and that's why India is behind, but Indians still boycott Chinese goods even loot Chinese investment, did you see CCP did this to imperialist USA and war criminal Japan? why CCP doesn't just fight back by banning more foreign company especially after USA and India already banned so many Chinese company? even you know you can feel happ to ban your rivial's company, you think Chinese don't know? you don't know the reason, your politicians don't know the reason, that's why India can't catch up with China.
The Chinese government subsidized all EV brands, including the American brand Tesla in China market, but Biden will only subsidize American car brand which piss off Korean car company, while Americans and Indians are boycotting Chinese goods and investment, the CCP continues to welcome foreign companies especially American investors to make money in the China market, that's when Sino-US relations were still in the highest midst of a trade war, Shanghai welcomes Tesla is because of the catfish effect that the CCP wants, Chinese local brands got pushed into corner after facing fierce competition from Tesla, they have to improve their competitiveness and innovation or die, hundreds of Chinese car brands and their billions of investment just disappeared because they can't compete.
Today, All Americans have no idea, have never seen Chinese brand cars, nobody knows how smart Chinese cars are. because the United States completely refuses Chinese cars to enter the US market. Can other American EV brand compete with Chinese EV brand in the world in the future? Is the United States now more protectionist than CCP? the United States even has rejected Chinese battery companies from setting up battery factories in the United States. Isn't this because American populist politicians are too populist just like Indian politicians? If protectionism could make China rich, then Mao Zedong's China would not be starving, ironically it's Americans taught CCP to open for free trade, market economy.
1
-
After the Korean War and the split between China and the Soviet Union, the PRC was contained by the United States and the Soviet Union in 1960. Therefore, the Soviet Union, Mongolia, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau, South Vietnam, Burma, India, and Pakistan were all anti-CCP. What next? ? CCP attacked Kinmen in 1958, India in 1962, aided the Viet Cong in 1964, intervened in Macau and Hong Kong in 1967, and attacked the Soviet Union in 1969.
1
-
1
-
@Jenny723 You are really ignorant of history. The China you are talking about is the Republic of China, which is now ROC Taiwan today.
Because British India, British Burma, the Russian Empire, the Japanese Empire, and French Vietnam once encroached on the territory of the Qing Empire, but the Qing government was too corrupt and weak to take it back until collapse.
Later, the ROC established by Sun Yat-sen inherited all the territorial claims of the Qing Dynasty, but ROC immediately fell into three decades of wars with warlords, Japanese and communists, so Kuomingtang could not regain it until got kicked to Taiwan 1949, so those disputed/lost territory since Qing Empire is still claimed by Taiwan on its ROC constituion.
After 1949, the PRC also inherited the territory of the ROC. Because too long time had passed, it was impossible for the CCP to go to war with all surrounding countries to regain its past territories. Therefore, the CCP and
Because of the Korean War and the Sino-Soviet split, the CCP was contained by both USA and Soviet allies. At that time, the CCP was not so strong that it could go to war with all surrounding countries, so the PRC made some compromises, PRC made compromises on borderline with Myanmar, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, Vietnam, Tajikistan, settled the land border disputes through friendly negotiations, and the land borders were only India and Bhutan controlled by India. The Qing government, the ROC government never recognized the McMahon Line, and India Inheriting the colonial legacy, Nehru's refusal to make any concessions led to the 1962 war and the Sino-Indian hostility to this day. Of course, the ROC Taiwan refused to recognize any agreements between the PRC and other countries, Therefore, today Taiwan has territorial disputes with all surrounding countries on ROC constituion.
What remains is the dispute in the South China Sea. Today, Taiwan still claims the 11-dash line, but Beijing changed from the 11-dash line to claiming the 9-dash line in 1957, because the CCP gave Bach Long Vi Island as a gift to North Vietnam to monitor the South Vietnam or American reconnaissance aircraft in 1957, considering that the Viet Cong has become pro-American again today, the CCP must regret its generosity back then.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Because China wants to have Internet sovereignty, communications sovereignty, media sovereignty, financial sovereignty, technological sovereignty, ideological sovereignty, values sovereignty, civilization sovereignty, and even aesthetic sovereignty, while India, Europe, and Japan are the Internet colonies of the United States.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I finally realized why Gordon Chang is still on American TV show after 20 years 'China Collapsing' propaganda, just look at enormous clickbaits of every video on this or other channel,
then you know people extremely enjoy such biased, exaggerated fakenews not reality and facts, it became big FORTUNE for both Gordon and media,
remember what's last enormous 'China Collapsing' story? Evergrande, not long time ago right? but there is new propaganda products come out everyday on your table,
such so-called Free Media doesn't guarantee your independent thinking, even worse and ironic they pretended like 'free, objective, honest' media to brainwash people in Free World,
because they know you subconsciously want China to fail, you think you don't need to increase your competitiveness to defeat your opponent?
Whether the elephant will attack you, it depends not on what you wish, but it depends how strong you are, or how elephant's mood today,
many people have never been to China, can't speak a word of Chinese, but they have a sense of superiority and pretend that they are China Expert,
Have you ever seen a Chinese who does not understand English and has never been to the USA but claiming to be an USA Expert?
some countries are too busy with wishing China to fail, rather than busy with improving themselves..all of sudden it's US economy collapsed before CCP in 2008 wallstreet crisis,
most ironically, it's China bailed out world economy especially USA, Australia, Canada through 2008–09 Chinese economic stimulus plan,
suddenly US politicians waked up and realized China won't collapse naturally, then they made bigger and bigger CHINA THREAT propaganda, like enormous Xinjiang Genocide story..
so it means they admitted previous 'CHINA COLLAPSING' story proves FAKE, right? then who really covered up China's rise by faking up news to calm down US politicians?
Why is China's strategy of 'hide his ambitions and disguise its claws' successful? Because there are hundreds of millions of people like Gordon Chang in USA,
such media and Gordon don't feel ashamed of their dishonest report last 20 years? people don't feel ashamed to keep Gordon on TV show?
that's why Chinese netizens joked Gordon should be awarded a medal for his patriotism(to China not USA) for his inside job,
because it's Gordon not CCP mouthpiece newspaper, successfully brainwashed all American elites and people, help China to avoid being contained by the USA in 2001,
if USA could foresee China's possible potential 20 years ago, then Trump's Trade War will be much much easier to win in 2021,
would those Free media and most anti-China activist Gordon be responsible for cover up CCP's rise? nope, he is still on TV but selling his new ‘CHINA THREAT’ propaganda product,
Gordon can always lead Bad China propaganda, but now the trend is 'CHINA THREAT' not 'CHINA COLLAPSE', this channel should follow Gordon's new trend.
it's new narrative to make huge money!
1
-
@priyanshusharma353 China is not populist and Xi doesn't need election, Therefore, in order to avoid provoking Indian public, China waited Indian public gradually became calm then China started releasing information about casualties and Indian POV video after the disengagement, because China’s biggest threat is the United States on East not India, and China will not waste energy on India unless it has to. India will not understand this kind of wisdom but regarded China as weak, just like China won the war easily in 1962 but retreated to LAC, even released the prisoners and returned the weapons. The whole world can’t understand why the Mao did this, in fact, it is because of China’s strategic focus It was the Soviet Union in Mongolia and the United States in Vietnam, Deng punished Vietnam in 1979 and then quickly retreated after one month, because China's greater strategic threat was the Soviet Union in Mongolia not Vietnam.
Xi just give Modi a way out or relieve one's embarrassment, you should thank China for peaceful relation
1
-
1
-
I finally realized why Gordon Chang is still on American TV show after 20 years 'China Collapsing' propaganda, just look at enormous clickbaits of every video on this or other channel,
then you know people extremely enjoy such biased, exaggerated fakenews not reality and facts, it became big FORTUNE for both Gordon and media,
remember what's last enormous 'China Collapsing' story? Evergrande, not long time ago right? but there is new propaganda products come out everyday on your table,
such so-called Free Media doesn't guarantee your independent thinking, even worse and ironic they pretended like 'free, objective, honest' media to brainwash people in Free World,
because they know you subconsciously want China to fail, you think you don't need to increase your competitiveness to defeat your opponent?
Whether the elephant will attack you, it depends not on what you wish, but it depends how strong you are, or how elephant's mood today,
many people have never been to China, can't speak a word of Chinese, but they have a sense of superiority and pretend that they are China Expert,
Have you ever seen a Chinese who does not understand English and has never been to the USA but claiming to be an USA Expert?
some countries are too busy with wishing China to fail, rather than busy with improving themselves..all of sudden it's US economy collapsed before CCP in 2008 wallstreet crisis,
most ironically, it's China bailed out world economy especially USA, Australia, Canada through 2008–09 Chinese economic stimulus plan,
suddenly US politicians waked up and realized China won't collapse naturally, then they made bigger and bigger CHINA THREAT propaganda, like enormous Xinjiang Genocide story..
so it means they admitted previous 'CHINA COLLAPSING' story proves FAKE, right? then who really covered up China's rise by faking up news to calm down US politicians?
Why is China's strategy of 'hide his ambitions and disguise its claws' successful? Because there are hundreds of millions of people like Gordon Chang in USA,
such media and Gordon don't feel ashamed of their dishonest report last 20 years? people don't feel ashamed to keep Gordon on TV show?
that's why Chinese netizens joked Gordon should be awarded a medal for his patriotism(to China not USA) for his inside job,
because it's Gordon not CCP mouthpiece newspaper, successfully brainwashed all American elites and people, help China to avoid being contained by the USA in 2001,
if USA could foresee China's possible potential 20 years ago, then Trump's Trade War will be much much easier to win in 2021,
would those Free media and most anti-China activist Gordon be responsible for cover up CCP's rise? nope, he is still on TV but selling his new ‘CHINA THREAT’ propaganda product,
Gordon can always lead Bad China propaganda, but now the trend is 'CHINA THREAT' not 'CHINA COLLAPSE', this channel should follow Gordon's new trend.
it's new narrative to make huge money!
1
-
I finally realized why Gordon Chang is still on American TV show after 20 years 'China Collapsing' propaganda, just look at enormous clickbaits of every video on this or other channel,
then you know people extremely enjoy such biased, exaggerated fakenews not reality and facts, it became big FORTUNE for both Gordon and media,
remember what's last enormous 'China Collapsing' story? Evergrande, not long time ago right? but there is new propaganda products come out everyday on your table,
such so-called Free Media doesn't guarantee your independent thinking, even worse and ironic they pretended like 'free, objective, honest' media to brainwash people in Free World,
because they know you subconsciously want China to fail, you think you don't need to increase your competitiveness to defeat your opponent?
Whether the elephant will attack you, it depends not on what you wish, but it depends how strong you are, or how elephant's mood today,
many people have never been to China, can't speak a word of Chinese, but they have a sense of superiority and pretend that they are China Expert,
Have you ever seen a Chinese who does not understand English and has never been to the USA but claiming to be an USA Expert?
some countries are too busy with wishing China to fail, rather than busy with improving themselves..all of sudden it's US economy collapsed before CCP in 2008 wallstreet crisis,
most ironically, it's China bailed out world economy especially USA, Australia, Canada through 2008–09 Chinese economic stimulus plan,
suddenly US politicians waked up and realized China won't collapse naturally, then they made bigger and bigger CHINA THREAT propaganda, like enormous Xinjiang Genocide story..
so it means they admitted previous 'CHINA COLLAPSING' story proves FAKE, right? then who really covered up China's rise by faking up news to calm down US politicians?
Why is China's strategy of 'hide his ambitions and disguise its claws' successful? Because there are hundreds of millions of people like Gordon Chang in USA,
such media and Gordon don't feel ashamed of their dishonest report last 20 years? people don't feel ashamed to keep Gordon on TV show?
that's why Chinese netizens joked Gordon should be awarded a medal for his patriotism(to China not USA) for his inside job,
because it's Gordon not CCP mouthpiece newspaper, successfully brainwashed all American elites and people, help China to avoid being contained by the USA in 2001,
if USA could foresee China's possible potential 20 years ago, then Trump's Trade War will be much much easier to win in 2021,
would those Free media and most anti-China activist Gordon be responsible for cover up CCP's rise? nope, he is still on TV but selling his new ‘CHINA THREAT’ propaganda product,
Gordon can always lead Bad China propaganda, but now the trend is 'CHINA THREAT' not 'CHINA COLLAPSE', this channel should follow Gordon's new trend.
it's new narrative to make huge money!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I finally realized why Gordon Chang is still on American TV show after 20 years 'China Collapsing' propaganda, just look at enormous clickbaits of every video on this or other channel,
then you know people extremely enjoy such biased, exaggerated fakenews not reality and facts, it became big FORTUNE for both Gordon and media,
remember what's last enormous 'China Collapsing' story? Evergrande, not long time ago right? but there is new propaganda products come out everyday on your table,
such so-called Free Media doesn't guarantee your independent thinking, even worse and ironic they pretended like 'free, objective, honest' media to brainwash people in Free World,
because they know you subconsciously want China to fail, you think you don't need to increase your competitiveness to defeat your opponent?
Whether the elephant will attack you, it depends not on what you wish, but it depends how strong you are, or how elephant's mood today,
many people have never been to China, can't speak a word of Chinese, but they have a sense of superiority and pretend that they are China Expert,
Have you ever seen a Chinese who does not understand English and has never been to the USA but claiming to be an USA Expert?
some countries are too busy with wishing China to fail, rather than busy with improving themselves..all of sudden it's US economy collapsed before CCP in 2008 wallstreet crisis,
most ironically, it's China bailed out world economy especially USA, Australia, Canada through 2008–09 Chinese economic stimulus plan,
suddenly US politicians waked up and realized China won't collapse naturally, then they made bigger and bigger CHINA THREAT propaganda, like enormous Xinjiang Genocide story..
so it means they admitted previous 'CHINA COLLAPSING' story proves FAKE, right? then who really covered up China's rise by faking up news to calm down US politicians?
Why is China's strategy of 'hide his ambitions and disguise its claws' successful? Because there are hundreds of millions of people like Gordon Chang in USA,
such media and Gordon don't feel ashamed of their dishonest report last 20 years? people don't feel ashamed to keep Gordon on TV show?
that's why Chinese netizens joked Gordon should be awarded a medal for his patriotism(to China not USA) for his inside job,
because it's Gordon not CCP mouthpiece newspaper, successfully brainwashed all American elites and people, help China to avoid being contained by the USA in 2001,
if USA could foresee China's possible potential 20 years ago, then Trump's Trade War will be much much easier to win in 2021,
would those Free media and most anti-China activist Gordon be responsible for cover up CCP's rise? nope, he is still on TV but selling his new ‘CHINA THREAT’ propaganda product,
Gordon can always lead Bad China propaganda, but now the trend is 'CHINA THREAT' not 'CHINA COLLAPSE', this channel should follow Gordon's new trend.
it's new narrative to make huge money!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheJohn222222 when Indians said Indian economy is much smaller than China, because China liberalized market in 1978 but India only liberalized market in 1991, it's 13 years later than China and that's why India is behind, but Indians still boycott Chinese goods even loot Chinese investment, did you see CCP did such to imperialist USA and war criminal Japan? why CCP doesn't just fight back by banning more foreign company especially after USA and India already banned so many Chinese company? even you know you can feel happy to ban your rivial's company, you think Chinese and Chinese communist don't know such easy way to win rival?? you don't know the reason why CCP didn't ban Indian company, your politicians also don't know the reason why Chinese don't boycott American investment, that's the reason why India can't catch up with China.
The Chinese government selflessly subsidized all EV brands, including the American brand Tesla in China market, Therefore, China has used the fastest and shortest time to establish an EV ecosystem, a new industry for China economy, becomes a leader in new technological trends, but Biden banned Chinese EVs from entering the United States, he selectively subsidized American car brand which already pissed off Korean car company, while Americans and Indians are boycotting Chinese goods and investment and think they are smarter than Chinese, but the CCP continues to welcome foreign companies especially American investors to make money in the China market, that's when Sino-US relations were still in the highest midst of a trade war, Shanghai welcomes Tesla is because of the catfish effect that the CCP wants, Chinese local brands got pushed into corner after facing fierce competition from Tesla, they have to improve their competitiveness and innovation or die, hundreds of Chinese car brands and their billions of investment just disappeared because they can't compete.
Today, All Americans have no idea, have never seen Chinese brand cars, nobody knows how smart Chinese cars are, Because they cannot have close contact with Chinese technology, and just because China has been locked down for three years during Covid, all the European, American and Japanese automobile industries suddenly feel pressure from China. But is this really all of sudden? Because Germans and Japanese cannot visit China, the Western media will not report other news other than "China is miserable" narrative, if the United States completely refuses Chinese cars to enter the US market, how can other American EV brand to compete with Chinese EV brand in the world in the future? Is the United States now more protectionist than Chinese communist policymaker? the United States even has rejected Chinese battery companies from setting up battery factories in the United States. Isn't this because American populist politicians are too populist just like Indian politicians? If protectionism could make China rich, then Mao Zedong's China would not be starving, Indian economy will stay poor just like before 1991, ironically it's Americans taught CCP to open for free trade, market economy.
Indians even talk proudly here: Oh, because of geopolitics, we must welcome Tesla and reject BYD. Doesn’t Modi want to be India’s Deng Xiaoping? Have you ever seen Deng Xiaoping said: I only want General Motors, but reject Toyota? ? when you proudly show the ignorant and confident side of Indians to the Chinese, the Chinese will only feel speechless and feel pity for you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@badguyfromnorthdagon You people are really ignorant and arrogant. You don't understand the history of China and Myanmar. It's like a white man who only knows how to speak Ni Hao and laughs at the Chinese politics, even pretend they know more than locals, who are you guys are so overconfident like Indians? China has never supported or fought against Myanmar because of ideology especially after Cold War, China will not interfere in other countries' internal affairs as long as the other country does not harm China's core interests, Do you have only ideology in your simple brain?
The relation between CCP and Chinese-Burmese minority on the China-Myanmar border are complicated. Some of Chinese-Burmese were remnant soldiers of the Kuomintang when CCP hunted down KMT across the China-Myanmar border in the 1960, which caused tensions in China-Myanmar relations. However, Mao Zedong eventually maintained friendly relations with Ne Win, and even huge concessions were made in the demarcation of the border lines. But after Ne Win's coup in 1962, he claimed to be Burmese-style socialism, then Ne Win adopted pro-American, pro-Soviet, and anti-CCP policy after Sino-Soviet Split 1959, then Mao Zedong has armed the Burma communists (many are Han minority) to fight against Ne Win's socialist junta regime since 1960s.
Mao and the Soviet Union directly fought as No.1 and No.2 socialist world leader in 1969, is this based on ideology? It's because the Soviet Union wanted to control China as a satellite state, Nixon embraced Mao Zedong in 1972 during Vietnam War, is this based on ideology? It's because Kissinger found that even the US could not contain both China and the Soviet Union in Vietnam at the same time! Deng Xiaoping and the West worked together to contain the Soviet Union in Afghanistan and Vietcong, Because Deng regarded the Viet Cong’s expeling Chinese minority aka Boat People as genocide, and regarded the military alliance between the Soviet Union and Vietnam in 1978, and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 as a military encirclement against the CCP, so what does this have to do with ideology? Deng also canceled the export of the communist revolution since 1980, However, when the West imposed sanctions on Myanmar junta oppressing democracy then Deng Xiaoping embraced Myanmar, which was isolated by West after 1988, because Deng wanted a pro-China Myanmar!
The Chinese ethnic minorities in Myanmar on the China-Myanmar border, whether they are descendants of the former Burmese Communist Party or the Kuomintang, are no longer related to ideology after Cold War, but they are more or less involved in the Golden Triangle crimes such like drug trade, such crimes have been suppressed under pressure from China. These descendants of the Chinese people in Myanmar, if they are very poor, they will try to make money by committing crimes, so the Chinese government hate them, but China also must protect them to avoid being massacred by the Burmese chauvinism military government.
When Aung San Suu Kyi came to power, she was not as anti-China and pro-American as expected because she did not want to be anti-China cannon fodder, and China is Myanmar's largest trading partner. The West is very angry that they have cultivated the democracy goddess for decades, but Aung San Suu Kyi has even accelerated cooperation with Xi Jinping, and cooperated closer with the Belt and Road Initiative to help China bypass Malacca. Therefore The West continued to use the Rohingya issue to remove the aura from the goddess as punishment. but antipathy towards the Rohingya people is the mainstream public opinion in Myanmar.
Min Aung Hlaing's sudden coup shocked China because he was actually pro-American and anti-China. His coup excuse was that Aung San Suu Kyi was too pro-China, However, the Biden administration refused to embrace this military junta because of Democrats' ideology, so the Xi protected the Min Aung Hlaing junta when Min Aung Hlaing is isolated and sanctioned by the West, but the corruption and cruelty of the military government remain unchanged, citizens in Myanmar's capital and big cities, whether Burmese or Chinese-Burmese, believed Western propaganda and were very disappointed with the CCP's support for Min Aung Hlaing, and some anti-China riots broke out such as burning down Chinese factories. But the CCP government is indifferent, and China and Russia still protect the Min Aung Hlaing government at the United Nations.
But as I said, Min Aung Hlaing is still an anti-China government, He resents Myanmar being infiltrated and controlled by Chinese capital, He resents the Chinese-Burmese rebels on the border, He did not want the military government's policy to be threatened by any foreign investment. Therefore, he did not restart the Belt and Road project that had been suspended for a long time. When Min Aung Hlaing sheltered the fraud group on the China-Myanmar border and refused to cooperate with the Chinese government in transferring the fraudsters, This has caused a great social impact in China almost equivalent to the impact of Mexican drug traffickers on the United States. The Chinese people have begun to laugh at Xi Jinping’s Wolf Warrior diplomacy as weak propaganda. When the movie “No More Bets”‘ focused telecom fraud in Southeast Asia, it means that Xi government that can no longer tolerate the inaction of the Min Aung Hlaing, then China must punish and retaliate anti-Chinese corrupt and brutal Min Aung Hlaing regime.
Peng Jiachang and his subordinate Ming Xuechang originally belonged to the Communist Party of Myanmar. Later they broke away from the Communist Party and established the Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army. However, Ming Xuechang later defected to the Myanmar military government, so Peng Jiachang fled to the mountains to fight guerrillas war. The Ming Xuechang and 'Four Families' sheltered by the Myanmar military government have accelerated the telecommunications fraud industry and human organ smuggling.
On October 20, 2023, a riot was suspected during the transfer of detained Chinese nationals in the "Crouching Tiger Villa" telecommunications fraud park to which Ming Xuechang belongs. There are reports that several Chinese nationals who tried to escape were killed by the guards, even undercover police officers who were killed after revealing their identities, information about the incident mainly comes from online self-media and remains to be officially confirmed. The Chinese internet calls it the "1020 Incident" and considers it to be the trigger of Operation 1027.
Then Peng Jiachang's son Peng Deren's Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army suddenly had advanced weapons, but the Chinese government never admitted to being involved in this new civil war, However, the Chinese government has publicly issued a wanted order for Ming Xuechang and other fraud groups. However, the Chinese government publicly issued a wanted order for fraud groups such as Ming Xuechang, and these leaders and Chinese victims were quickly transferred to Yunnan, China by Peng Deren's rebels.
At this time, rebels from other ethnic groups also joined the Burmese Chinese rebels, intending to overthrow the Min Aung Hlaing military government in one fell swoop. However, China needs a stable and pro-China Myanmar, at least the Chinese-Burmese town on the border must be pro-China, Xi does not want to see its investments destroyed, nor does it want to see an influx of refugees, nor does it want to see Min Aung Hlaing embraced the United States, will China step up its efforts to overthrow the anti-China military junta in Myanmar and bring the pro-China democratic government of Aung San Suu Kyi back to power? China will pay close attention to the development of the situation.
1
-
1
-
nope, CCP attacked UN in 1950, CCP attacked attacked India in 1964, CCP attacked Soviet in 1969, CCP attacked S.Vietnam in 1974, CCP attacked Vietnam in 1979,
US-led UN force, India and Soviet are not little kid, right? so CCP never bullied anyone because they are big or small, capitalist or communist, If any country tries to invade or contain China, then CCP will retaliate against you. Don’t play the victim card just because you are small, For example, Lithuania supported Taiwan independence and was retaliated by China. If the mini Vatican also supported Taiwan independence, then China would also retaliate against the Vatican. Being small and weak is not the reason for you to violate the United Nations Charter..
Let me remind you that all the territories claimed by CCP today are also claimed by Taiwan. For example, Taiwan claims an 11-dash line since 1945, which is larger than CCP’s 9-dash line, This is the order of World War II because the Chinese paid for it with blood. Does the United States pretend to forget that it was US navy who gave the South China Sea to the Chinese? talk is useless, use blood to get it back.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Yultong51 You are so educated and brainwashed by media, you don’t understand Chinese history and Cold War history at all. The Chinese who first occupied Taiping Island, Thitu Island, Triton Island, Woody Island and other islands and reefs in the South China Sea 1946 were the Kuomintang navy. This is the right wing party that was pro-American, anti-communist, anti-Soviet, and anti-Japanese, ring-wing, dictatorial, a Chinese nationalistic party, Kuomingtang(KMT) literally means Nationalist Party in Chinese, KMT has been an ally with West during World War II and the Cold War until today. the Kuomintang proposed the 11-dash line in 1947, The CCP inherited all the territorial claims of the Kuomintang after the civil war in 1949, but it was changed to 11 lines in 1957 into 9-dash line since then.
Today, the pro-Chinese, pro-American, pro-democracy, anti-communist Kuomintang in Taiwan still claims the 11-dash line loudly, but the anti-Chinese, pro-American, pro-liberalism Democratic Progressive Party in Taiwan has kept a low profile, claiming only Taiping Island and Dongsha Island that Taiwan actually occupies, but Taiwan hasn't removed 11-dash line yet in ROC constituion.
1
-
1
-
CCP attacked South Vietnam invader against American Bamboo Curtain and retook territory from 9 dash-line, Battle of Paracel Islands 1974 during Second Indochina War, US navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't condemn that extremely tiny PLA navy then, even when S.Vietnam still should be defended by SEATO 1954-1977.
CCP attacked Viet cong navy expansionist against Soviet's encirclement and retook territory from 9-dash line, Johnson South Reef Skirmish 1988 during Third Indochina War, Soviet red navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't even say one word against relatively weak PLA navy then, even Vietnam should be defended by Soviet-Vietnam Military Treaty 1978-1991.
Did India win 1962 war when both West and Soviet supported Nehru? imperialism is a paper tiger, Modi should know that China is no longer like in 1962, if India wants to contain China again then what if China would also play tougher as revenge? PLA navy warships will definitely be stationed in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives to push back containment from Mod's Foward Policy 2.0.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Nigerians and the colonists are fighting over the ownership of Niger's uranium mines and gold mines, because most Nigerian natural resources exported to EU especially France,
people still don't know why Australia is rich but Niger is starving? because Niger as country is rich but Nigerians as humans are poor, why?
because the corrupt puppet regime sold expensive raw material to other countries too cheaply, because local people never controls the profit from export,
but Autralia, Canada, Russia, Saudi Arabia controls profit of raw material export and use profit on own people's benefit, so why Niger can't do like that?
Niger and other African countries fell into typical trap of neo-colonialism, although everyone knows Niger is an independent sovereign country in the United Nations for decades,
but it is not independent in terms of finance, economy, military, media and politics, former colonists allowed African countries' sovereignty not because they felt guilty,
it's because they wanted to reduce the local's resistance to the old-colonialism, then locals can naively and obediently enjoy freedom and democracy from neo-colonialism next decades,
the locals should kneel down and beg to the former colonists and said: don’t be like vampires please leave some bones for the locals,
or fight for your real freedom and human rights, STARVING IS NOT DEMOCRACY!
1
-
1
-
1
-
@loremasteringwion9930 Why should Americans intervene in the civil war on the Korean peninsula? Do you think the British should intervene in the American Civil War?
North Korea and South Korea both want to unify each other, Since it is a civil war, there is no such thing as aggression, Didn't South Korea harass North Korea on the border?
but let North Korea launch a unified war due to Jeju Island Massacre, South Korea's right-wing dictator and the United States slaughtered a 1/4 civilians in Jeju Island, Just because South Korean government suspect that Jeju locals are inclined to communist, If the American rightists slaughtered the American leftists in the United States, wouldn't it lead to a civil war?
Later, with the outbreak of the Korean War, American bombs killed 20% population of North Koreans, Isn't that a liberation or genocide?
the United States still blocks and sanctions North Korea for half a century. This is not an economic genocide against civilians? Isn't this just similar like what the Israeli collective punishment of Gaza civilians?
1
-
@loremasteringwion9930 Why should Americans intervene in the civil war on the Korean peninsula? Do you think the British should intervene in the American Civil War?
With South Korea rejecting the referendum on reunification, North Korea and South Korea both wanted to unify each other, Since it is a civil war, there is no such thing as aggression or invasion, Didn't South Korea harass North Korea on the border?
But North Korea launched the unified war due to Jeju Island Massacre, South Korea's right-wing dictator and the United States slaughtered a 1/4 civilians in Jeju Island, Just because South Korean government suspect that Jeju locals are inclined to communist, If the American rightists slaughtered the American leftists in the United States, wouldn't it lead to a civil war?
Later, with the outbreak of the Korean War, American bombs killed 20% population of North Koreans, it's a liberation or genocide?
the United States today still blocks and sanctions North Korea for half a century, This is not an economic genocide against civilians? Isn't this just similar like Israel's collective punishment against Gaza civilians?
1
-
well, China and Taiwan both signed UNCLOS but USA didn't, that's why Beijing claims only islands within 9dashline, Taiwan claims only islands within 11dashline, or both PRC ROC can claim whole water as internal waters, both West and Soviet supported ROC's 11dashline in 1945, because ROC is ally side and biggest contributor in Asia during WWII, Chinese suffered more deaths than whole indochina combined, Chinese also killed more Japanese than whole Indochina did, that's why International community gave South China Sea like a reward, or why you think US navy gave warships to Chinese and escorted ROC navy took over Thitu island, Taiping island in 1946? because American Phillippines, French Vietnam, British Malaya were still colonies, when West gave South China Sea to Chinese in 1945 then, all western colonies can't say NO. PRC then inherited same claim from ROC after CCP kicked KMT to Taiwan, Chinese Civil War 1949, but PRC changed to 9dashline claim after giving Bach Long Vi island to North Vietnam in 1957.
Greece controls almost 99% islands in Aegean Sea but Turkey only controls 1%, because Greece is the winner after First Balkan War, WWI, WWII,
Chinese can claim and control many islands within 11dashline because it's USA let ROC the biggest contributor to control after Japan retreated from South China Sea,
PRC claims same because CCP is winner in Chinese Civil War then ROC retreated to Taiwan,
PRC can control Paracel Island because PRC defeat South Vietnam navy in 1974, USA didn't even condemn CCP at all then for her little ally,
PRC can control Johnson South Reef because PRC defeat Vietnam navy in 1988, Soviet didn't even notice at all for her little ally,
PRC can rise up as superpower because CCP defeat USA in 1953, India in 1962, Soviet in 1969, Vietnam in 1991, if you contain or invade then CCP would take revenge,
CCP is peaceful for last 30 years but very aggressive in 1950-1990 Cold War era, so CCP will be aggressive again in Cold War 2.0 against new anti-China containment.
if USA tries to rewrite WWII order then they need to defeat China in proxy wars, WWIII not by talk or some staged court or fake paper,
because Chinese paid huge cost to get Taiwan and South China Sea after WWII, USA need to pay more cost to force China to give up in Cold War 2.0.
tell Americans don't be draft dodger in Canada in Fourth Indochina War because CCP is not small like Vietcong.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Taiwan? nope, if Russia is expanding to Poland, if muslims are surrounding Israel,
then we will weaponize Cuba and Venezuala, tell N.Korea to attack S.Korea, tell Russia to surround Japan,
then PLA would block Taiwan's port but not land troop, only attack any foreign warships trying to save Taiwan,
as long as Taiwan is democracy then they will have a regime-change after starvation,
let's see how many front war can USA to fight, then we can know who is more important to USA,
I think it's Israel and Cuba.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You are really ignorant of history. The China you are talking about is the Republic of China, which is now ROC Taiwan today.
Because British India, British Burma, the Russian Empire, the Japanese Empire, and French Vietnam once encroached on the territory of the Qing Empire, but the Qing government was too corrupt and weak to take it back until collapse.
Later, the ROC established by Sun Yat-sen inherited all the territorial claims of the Qing Dynasty, but ROC immediately fell into three decades of wars with warlords, Japanese and communists, so Kuomingtang could not regain it until got kicked to Taiwan 1949, so those disputed/lost territory since Qing Empire is still claimed by Taiwan on its ROC constituion.
After 1949, the PRC also inherited the territory of the ROC. Because too long time had passed, it was impossible for the CCP to go to war with all surrounding countries to regain its past territories. Therefore, the CCP and
Because of the Korean War and the Sino-Soviet split, the CCP was contained by both USA and Soviet allies. At that time, the CCP was not so strong that it could go to war with all surrounding countries, so the PRC made some compromises, PRC made compromises on borderline with Myanmar, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, Vietnam, Tajikistan, settled the land border disputes through friendly negotiations, and the land borders were only India and Bhutan controlled by India. The Qing government, the ROC government never recognized the McMahon Line, and India Inheriting the colonial legacy, Nehru's refusal to make any concessions led to the 1962 war and the Sino-Indian hostility to this day. Of course, the ROC Taiwan refused to recognize any agreements between the PRC and other countries, Therefore, today Taiwan has territorial disputes with all surrounding countries on ROC constituion.
What remains is the dispute in the South China Sea. Today, Taiwan still claims the 11-dash line, but Beijing changed from the 11-dash line to claiming the 9-dash line in 1957, because the CCP gave Bach Long Vi Island as a gift to North Vietnam to monitor the South Vietnam or American reconnaissance aircraft in 1957, considering that the Viet Cong has become pro-American again today, the CCP must regret its generosity back then.
1
-
I finally realized why Gordon Chang is still on American TV show after 20 years 'China Collapsing' propaganda, just look at enormous clickbaits of every video on this or other channel,
then you know people extremely enjoy such biased, exaggerated fakenews not reality and facts, it became big FORTUNE for both Gordon and media,
remember what's last enormous 'China Collapsing' story? Evergrande, not long time ago right? but there is new propaganda products come out everyday on your table,
such so-called Free Media doesn't guarantee your independent thinking, even worse and ironic they pretended like 'free, objective, honest' media to brainwash people in Free World,
because they know you subconsciously want China to fail, you think you don't need to increase your competitiveness to defeat your opponent?
Whether the elephant will attack you, it depends not on what you wish, but it depends how strong you are, or how elephant's mood today,
many people have never been to China, can't speak a word of Chinese, but they have a sense of superiority and pretend that they are China Expert,
Have you ever seen a Chinese who does not understand English and has never been to the USA but claiming to be an USA Expert?
some countries are too busy with wishing China to fail, rather than busy with improving themselves..all of sudden it's US economy collapsed before CCP in 2008 wallstreet crisis,
most ironically, it's China bailed out world economy especially USA, Australia, Canada through 2008–09 Chinese economic stimulus plan,
suddenly US politicians waked up and realized China won't collapse naturally, then they made bigger and bigger CHINA THREAT propaganda, like enormous Xinjiang Genocide story..
so it means they admitted previous 'CHINA COLLAPSING' story proves FAKE, right? then who really covered up China's rise by faking up news to calm down US politicians?
Why is China's strategy of 'hide his ambitions and disguise its claws' successful? Because there are hundreds of millions of people like Gordon Chang in USA,
such media and Gordon don't feel ashamed of their dishonest report last 20 years? people don't feel ashamed to keep Gordon on TV show?
that's why Chinese netizens joked Gordon should be awarded a medal for his patriotism(to China not USA) for his inside job,
because it's Gordon not CCP mouthpiece newspaper, successfully brainwashed all American elites and people, help China to avoid being contained by the USA in 2001,
if USA could foresee China's possible potential 20 years ago, then Trump's Trade War will be much much easier to win in 2021,
would those Free media and most anti-China activist Gordon be responsible for cover up CCP's rise? nope, he is still on TV but selling his new ‘CHINA THREAT’ propaganda product,
Gordon can always lead Bad China propaganda, but now the trend is 'CHINA THREAT' not 'CHINA COLLAPSE', this channel should follow Gordon's new trend.
it's new narrative to make huge money!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rakisyc ROC declared the 11-dash line in 1945. the West and the Soviet Union asked the Chinese to take over South China Sea after Japanese withdrew, US navy gave 8 warships to Chinese and helped ROC navy to control Taiping Island, Thitu Island, Triton Island, and Woody Island in 1946. At that time, all Southeast Asian countries were Western colonies, They were not sovereign and independent countries, so when the Western masters gave the South China Sea as a gift to the Chinese, for Chinese sacrifice and contribution in World War II. American Philippines, French Vietnam, British Malaya, British Brunei, Dutch Indonesia, they didn't and can't object Chinese claim in 1945, then 11-dash line will be regarded as the World War II order by the Kuomintang and CCP.
The PRC inherited the 11-line and claim same in 1949 after Chinese Civil War, but today Beijing only claims the 9-dash line because Mao Zedong gave the Bach Long Vi to Ho Chi Minh in 1957 served as a base to monitor Western reconnaissance aircraft during Vietnam War. Of course Mao Zedong would not have thought that Deng Xiaoping and the pro-Soviet Le Duan would go to war in 1978, nor would he have thought that today's Viet Cong would become more pro-American. I think the CCP must have regretted removing the two-dash line in 1957, just like Putin today regretted that Khrushchev gave Crimea to his best ally Ukraine.
However, because ROC has always been a puppet of the United States, when the Philippines seized Thitu Island from Taiwan navy during 1971 storm, then Taiwan canceled its retaliatory military operations under pressure from the United States. The PRC retook the Paracel Islands from South Vietnam in 1974 and Johnson South Reef from the Viet Cong in 1988. And because the PRC navy was still weak and backward, also the CCP paid more attention to the economy after the Cold War. Therefore, the PRC did not seize the very distant Spratly Islands.
From a Chinese perspective, the presence of the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Indonesia in the South China Sea are all invaders and a disruption to the order of World War II. Today's separatist party in Taiwan still occupy Taiping Island and Dongsha Island. Although they have not canceled the 11-dash line in the ROC constitution, they have kept a very low profile in line with US propaganda. If the United States wants to rewrite the order of World War II and force the CCP to abandon the legacy of World War II, the United States must defeat the PRC in the Fourth Indochina War, Cold War 2.0, and World War III.
The international community was willing to let the Chinese take over the South China Sea in 1945. That was because the KMT/CCP eliminated more Japanese than Southeast Asians and resisted since 1931 until 1945, and all Southeast Asian countries and colonial troops surrendered to Japan in 1942. so the Philippines will should win your trophy by sacrificing more blood in WWIII than the Chinese did in WWII, does the Philippines really think you can gain territory by relying on US and propaganda wars? The CCP has never relied on propaganda wars to rise. The CCP was the winner of the Civil War, World War II, the Korean War, the First Indochina War, the Second Indochina War, the Sino-Indian War, the Sino-Soviet War, and the Third Indochina War.
However, due to geopolitical relations in Cold War 2.0, China does not want to push all ASEAN to the United States. Therefore, as a strong power, China has proposed a code of conduct in the South China Sea. No one can occupy new uninhabited islands. All parties should freeze the status quo and develop their economies. However, only the Philippines refuses to join this club. Therefore, China will think that Bongbong is used by the United States to undermine China-ASEAN relation.Therefore, China will only isolate and retaliate against the pro-American proxy/invader, not Duterte but Bongbong regime in the Philippines, CCP will give more benefits to the pro-China invader like Indonesia, neutral like Vietnam and Malaysia, a low-key and too weak Brunei. This is the carrot and the stick of the Chinese. The Vietnamese learned from the three Indochina wars to be pro-French, pro-American and pro-Soviet. The Philippines will also learn this in the future.
1
-
1
-
@ZeroResurrected USSR/CCCP is Russian, PRC/CCP is Chinese, you know they are very different race? well, would you even think UK and USA are same because they are Anglo-Saxons? would you think China and Vietnam are same beacuse they are communist? would you think USA and Brazil are same because they are Presidential Republic Democracy?
China got 5 times bigger population than Soviet, now it's like 10 times bigger Russia or Japan scale, China has Soviet-style polity and military but with Japan-style exporting economy, Soviet faced containment from G7 China Muslim ASEAN in in proxy wars Indochina and Afghanistan 1980s, but China today only face containment from G7, but Russia, Muslims, ASEAN, Latin America, Africa Union are not anti-China.
more importantly, China has much bigger GDP/ppp than USA but Soviet and Japan's peak time is only 60% for USA,
China's industrial output is like G7 combined, it's only happened on USA before Pearl Harbour Attack.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm in China, if you Americans really want bring back manufacturing jobs, then you should upgrade your high-end industry by investing education, chip industry is good one maybe AI industry too, it's impossible to bring back low-end manufacturing jobs, would you make toys and socks for 12 hours in American factory? would you produce polluted steel in USA? would you keep same salary like Indian workers? just impossible, why you guys just don't have common sense on how market economy works? is USA real capitalist?
I know many Americans workers lost jobs, but it should be your big company to pay more tax to US government then your government should educate you to enter higher end industry, even we Chinese exports low-end industry to poorer countries like Vietnam Mexico India Africa but Trump just speed up the transition, China never thinks of sanctioning those poorer countries because communist Vietnam 'steal' our jobs because we know it's natural trent, they just won't go back to USA because your salary, or every cost is just too high.
Let me tell you how to sovle Sino-US trade imbalance, stop your self-sanction/embargo on high-tech civilian products exports to China, if you don't sell chips to China then USA doesn't even have cheap low-end industry, what can you sell to China? We can buy your cheap soybeans and expensive planes too, but we won't buy your expensive gas because we are not colony like EU, so obey normal rule of economy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As Chinese, even if I have never been to Iran but we Chinese all know that most poor Iranians are pro-American, So your intelligence system is riddled with holes. This is actually a bit like when Japan invaded China, millions of Chinese under Japanese puppet Wang Jingwei regime also surrendered to Japan in 1940, because the ROC government was too corrupt and Japan was too powerful then, most Chinese people got colonial inferiority complex in mind, poor Chinese care more about livelihood, not defeating invaders for a corrupt KMT government, in the end, Chiang Kai shek and Mao Zedong united to defeat Japan, but Chinese have paid tens of millions of people's lives.
After establishment of PRC in 1949, Chinese just became totally different race, It were difficult to deal with the Japanese invaders in 1945, then Chinese could easily kick the US-led United Nations forces to 38th parallel north in 1950, What exactly changed China within 5 years? Because it's Mao Zedong, Mao Zedong liberated the Chinese from colonial mind, he eliminated three mountains: Imperialism, Feudalism and Bureaucratic capitalism, He gave the land of wealthy people to 95% people Chinese farmers, Of course, an important point is that all pro-West rightists got purged before CCP joined the anti-USA war.
Later, CCP also easily won Sino-Indian War, Sino-Soviet War, and also won proxy war like Vietnam War, Third Indochina War, Soviet-Afghan War....we also purged pro-Soviet revisionist CCPs before we confronted against Soviet and Vietcong. So if Iran can't liberate your women, if you don't even purge your traitors, then how China should trust Iran?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sudarsandm Tibet was a political entity from 1911~1950 but not an independent country, because there's no countries even British India never recognized Tibet as country, so you should tell me which country set embassy in Tibet before? well, Qing Empire, ROC, PRC never accepted Tibet independence, it's British India invaded Tibet, drew McMahon Line and made an agreement with Tibet separatist but not Chinese central government, today even Taiwan still claims South Tibet in ROC constituion.
if I use your logic, Russia can make a deal with Donbass separatist and draw new borderline but blame Ukraine is expansionist,
China can support separatists in your 7sisters and make deal with them about McMahon Line, liberate them from Hindu nationalist oppression,
you guys just don't know UN charter, don't you?
Nehru's Forward Policy means expansionist, India is the only country annxed Sikkim after WWII, and Sikkim was real independent country recognized by UN members before.
so it's India wants colonist legacy and become Indian colonists.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I finally realized why Gordon Chang is still on American TV show after 20 years 'China Collapsing' propaganda, just look at enormous clickbaits of every video on this or other channel,
then you know people extremely enjoy such biased, exaggerated fakenews not reality and facts, it became big FORTUNE for both Gordon and media,
remember what's last enormous 'China Collapsing' story? Evergrande, not long time ago right? but there is new propaganda products come out everyday on your table,
such so-called Free Media doesn't guarantee your independent thinking, even worse and ironic they pretended like 'free, objective, honest' media to brainwash people in Free World,
because they know you subconsciously want China to fail, you think you don't need to increase your competitiveness to defeat your opponent?
Whether the elephant will attack you, it depends not on what you wish, but it depends how strong you are, or how elephant's mood today,
many people have never been to China, can't speak a word of Chinese, but they have a sense of superiority and pretend that they are China Expert,
Have you ever seen a Chinese who does not understand English and has never been to the USA but claiming to be an USA Expert?
some countries are too busy with wishing China to fail, rather than busy with improving themselves..all of sudden it's US economy collapsed before CCP in 2008 wallstreet crisis,
most ironically, it's China bailed out world economy especially USA, Australia, Canada through 2008–09 Chinese economic stimulus plan,
suddenly US politicians waked up and realized China won't collapse naturally, then they made bigger and bigger CHINA THREAT propaganda, like enormous Xinjiang Genocide story..
so it means they admitted previous 'CHINA COLLAPSING' story proves FAKE, right? then who really covered up China's rise by faking up news to calm down US politicians?
Why is China's strategy of 'hide his ambitions and disguise its claws' successful? Because there are hundreds of millions of people like Gordon Chang in USA,
such media and Gordon don't feel ashamed of their dishonest report last 20 years? people don't feel ashamed to keep Gordon on TV show?
that's why Chinese netizens joked Gordon should be awarded a medal for his patriotism(to China not USA) for his inside job,
because it's Gordon not CCP mouthpiece newspaper, successfully brainwashed all American elites and people, help China to avoid being contained by the USA in 2001,
if USA could foresee China's possible potential 20 years ago, then Trump's Trade War will be much much easier to win in 2021,
would those Free media and most anti-China activist Gordon be responsible for cover up CCP's rise? nope, he is still on TV but selling his new ‘CHINA THREAT’ propaganda product,
Gordon can always lead Bad China propaganda, but now the trend is 'CHINA THREAT' not 'CHINA COLLAPSE', this channel should follow Gordon's new trend.
it's new narrative to make huge money!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@plusultra7258 PRC attacked India because India was forcing PRC to accept colonial legacy, it's British India invaded weak Qing's Tibet and drew McMahon Line then India wanted to inherite after independence, ROC was in civil war but never accepted McMahon Line that's why even today Taiwan still claims South Tibet in ROC constitution, PRC just unified Tibet after kicking ROC to Taiwan in 1949, so morally speaking it's India became colonist after kicked off British, it's socialism India betrayed socialism China, Nehru lost 1962 war as an invader and his expansionism FORWARDY POLICY failed, but 1962 war is small conflict for China if compared to Korean War and Vietnam War not even mention 1967 is tiny skirmish, it's Indians with an inferiority complex can't let go not China.
you can only focus more those 'CHINA COLLAPSE' story from Gordon Chang style channel to make you feel better, but China still has 530% bigger GDP than India, so it's not 1962 anymore because India and China at same level GDP in 1962 but today gap is much wider, China has NO.2 navy even more warships than US navy, what if US navy blocks Strait of Malacca? PLA navy would just attack US navy,
when PRC was much poorer than India and Africa, CCP confronted against West in proxy war in Korea 1950-1953, Indochina 1946-1975, Taiwan strait 1954-1979, Tibet 1959, CCP also confronted against Soviet in border standoff 1960-1990, and proxy wars in Indochina 1978-1991, Afghanistan 1979-1989, then what you except if India navy block Indian Ocean? Chinese missiles in Tibet is near to your capital, why you are trying to threaten China when you are weaker position? China doesn't consider India as enemy or threat, it's all because India joined USA or Soviet's anti-Chinese encirclement, today Modi is trying to join USA's new Bamboo Curtain again then Modi would become as another Nehru.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
CCP attacked South Vietnam invader against American Bamboo Curtain and retook territory from 9 dash-line, Battle of Paracel Islands 1974 during Second Indochina War, US navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't condemn that extremely tiny PLA navy then, even when S.Vietnam still should be defended by SEATO 1954-1977.
CCP attacked Viet cong navy expansionist against Soviet's encirclement and retook territory from 9-dash line, Johnson South Reef Skirmish 1988 during Third Indochina War, Soviet red navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't even say one word against relatively weak PLA navy then, even Vietnam should be defended by Soviet-Vietnam Military Treaty 1978-1991.
Did India win 1962 war when both West and Soviet supported Nehru? imperialism is a paper tiger, Modi should know that China is no longer like in 1962, if India wants to contain China again then what if China would also play tougher as revenge? PLA navy warships will definitely be stationed in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives to push back containment from Mod's Foward Policy 2.0.
1
-
1
-
After World War II, the only country in the world that was annexed was Sikkim, Obviously Bhutan is an independent and sovereign country, why does Bhutan dare not establish diplomatic relations with the United States, China, and Russia? Because Bhutan's diplomacy needs "guidance" from India, India treats Bhutan as a puppet state and colony. Of course, Bhutan is very afraid that they will be another Sikkim. Therefore, Bhutan needs China's help to get rid of India's chains. Bhutan also fear of provoking India too much and leading to annexation. Why Bhutan, Nepal and Sri Lanka turn against India? Of course it is because of India's own beggar imperialism and interference in the internal affairs of neighboring countries.
The Indian media often propagates that CCP has border disputes with all its neighbors. In fact, India is talking about Taiwan, because Taiwan also claims southern Tibet against India, the Diaoyu Islands against Japan, and the 11-dash line against Southeast Asia in the Constitution of the Republic of China. Today, Taiwan still controls Taiping Island and Dongsha Island in the South China Sea. Do you know how far they are from Taiwan? Because the PRC inherits sovereignty from the ROC, as long as it is territory claimed by Beijing, Taiwan must also claim it.
These so-called territorial disputes have existed from the Qing Dynasty to the Republic of China, and have continued to exist after being invaded by British India, British Burma, the Russian Empire, and the Japanese Empire. The Republic of China has been in a civil war for a long time and therefore has no ability to recapture it. The ROC did not give up after World War II. ROC ran to Taiwan after the civil war in 1949 and has not given up even today. On the contrary, after the PRC inherited the same sovereignty after the civil war, it compromised with its neighbors, gave up some territory to friendly countries, or divided some territories by negociatation.
When Indian propaganda accuses the Chinese of being aggressive towards their neighbors, India will soon find that the only land border disputes with China are India and India-controlled Bhutan, because China and North Korea, Myanmar, Pakistan, Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Vietnam has no border dispute on land anymore.
Soon Bhutan will discover that India will not allow Bhutan and China to demarcate the borderline, and India will continue to use China-Bhutan border conflicts to interfere in Bhutan's internal affairs. As a result, Bhutan will distrust India even more and need more balance from China.
1
-
1
-
1
-
CCP attacked South Vietnam invader against American Bamboo Curtain and retook territory from 9 dash-line, Battle of Paracel Islands 1974 during Second Indochina War, US navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't condemn that extremely tiny PLA navy then, even when S.Vietnam still should be defended by SEATO 1954-1977.
CCP attacked Viet cong navy expansionist against Soviet's encirclement and retook territory from 9-dash line, Johnson South Reef Skirmish 1988 during Third Indochina War, Soviet red navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't even say one word against relatively weak PLA navy then, even Vietnam should be defended by Soviet-Vietnam Military Treaty 1978-1991.
Did India win 1962 war when both West and Soviet supported Nehru? imperialism is a paper tiger, Modi should know that China is no longer like in 1962, if India wants to contain China again then what if China would also play tougher as revenge? PLA navy warships will definitely be stationed in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives to push back containment from Mod's Foward Policy 2.0.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Suyash_Bajpai 10 years? even China stays put for 30 years, India can't catach up, you think China only has 50% bigger GDP than India?
NO, it's 600% bigger GDP, you guys are uneducated and overconfident.
btw, 150+ countries joined BRI, so your debt trap fakenews isn't working, they just prefer Chinese debt than IMF loans,
also, you have to remember, Taiwan claims same thing like Beijing, Taiwan also claims 11dashline, China only has land dispute with India, and India controlled Bhutan, China already solved border dispute with others, India is only one keeps colonial borderline.
1
-
Everyone Has a Plan Until They Get Punched in the Mouth ----Mike Tyson
When you try to threaten CCP with help from EVERYONE, like the First Island Chain, the Five Eyes, the G7, the Democratic Bloc, the Free World, or The World, don't you know that the CCP was confronting almost the whole world in the Cold War? at least it's First World and Second World.
You must know about the anti-Soviet Iron Curtain, but have you heard about the anti-CCP Bamboo Curtain in Cold War?
It's Western anti-CCP group 1950-1979: South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, British Hong Kong, Portuguese Macau, Philippines, South Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Kingdom of Laos, Kingdom of Cambodia, Kingdom of Thailand, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Kingdom of Bhutan, India, Pakistan, and of course and anti-CCP NATO, Australia, New Zealand, etc.
UN force in Korean War :USA, S.Korea, Australia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Canada, France, the Philippines, Turkey, Thailand, South Africa, Greece, Belgium, Luxembourg, Colombia and Ethiopia provided varying numbers of fighting troops. In addition, Sweden and Denmark each sent a hospital ship, and India, Norway and Italy sent their own field ambulance teams
There are also Soviet's anti-Chinese encirclement after Sino-Soviet split since 1959,
It's Soviet's anti-Chinese group 1959-1989: the Soviet Union, Mongolia, Afghanistan, India, Vietnam, Laos, and anti-Chinese Eastern Europe, Yugoslavia, Cuba, etc.
What I mean is that the United States and the Soviet Union were very happy when they successfully formed anti-PRC containment. They thought that this would be able to isolate, sanction, block, threaten, deter the CCP. It was indeed super suffocating to get contained by both the capitalist world and socialist world led by the United States and the Soviet Union simultaneously from 1960-1980 for 20 years, but nobody remember what was the CCP’s response to such threat?
Then CCP attacked India 1962 1967, joined Vietnam War 1964-1975, directly attacked S.Vietnam 1974, attacked and contained Soviet 1969-1989.
when you mean EVERYONE, you need to bring more people, because CCP wasn't weak like in Korean War anymore.
1
-
@HABIBIBIBIBIBI50 You are so ignorant of history. Amethyst Incident In 1949, the CCP claimed that the UK tried to prevent the PLA from crossing the Yangtze river to chase the Kuomintang troops, so the PLA bombarded British warships, Churchill claimed to retaliate against the Mao Zedong, but nothing happened. then The CCP expelled the Kuomintang to Taiwan and unified the mainland China. The UK was indeed the first capitalist country to recognize the PRC in 1950.
United Nations Command troops in 1950, As a foreign troops in Korean War, Britain has sent the second largest number of troops, only behind to the United States.. Did they defeat the PLA? Why did the US military retreat from the Yalu River to the 38th parallel?
During the Sino-British negotiations in 1982, Mrs. Thatcher felt that she had just defeated Argentina in the Falklands, but Deng Xiaoping did not want to negotiate at all, because at that time, the CCP was confronting the Soviet Union on the Sino-Mongolian border, and was continuing to fight against the Viet Cong on border during Third Indochina War. Thatcher walked out of the conference room and fell down the stairs, which meant she gave up the military defense of British Hong Kong. then the UK peacefully handed over the colony of Hong Kong Island to the CCP.
Germany? Today's global firepower rankings, the UK is fifth, and Germany is 25th! Not even as good as Taiwan and Thailand!
I finally understand why Ukrainians are so naive. It’s you idiots who really encouraged by the West’s words, voluntarily chose to be anti-Russian cannon fodder. when South Vietnam was in SEATO, the PLA defeat South Vietnam navy and took back the Paracels in 1974, what was the United States doing?
1
-
UN force in Korean War:USA, S.Korea, Australia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Canada, France, the Philippines, Turkey, Thailand, South Africa, Greece, Belgium, Luxembourg, Colombia and Ethiopia provided varying numbers of fighting troops. In addition, Sweden and Denmark each sent a hospital ship, and India, Norway and Italy sent their own field ambulance teams
Anti-communist force in Vietnam War: USA, S.Vietnam, S.Korea, Laos, Khmer, Australia, Thailand, New Zealand, Taiwan, Philippines provided varying numbers of fighting troops.
Why USA failed to deter and scare CCP to join Korean War and Vietnam War?
when both West and Soviet supported India, why failed to deter and scare CCP in Sino-Indian War 1962?
Your ignorance and contempt for the CCP will eventually make you aware of history after the war.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1