Comments by "joe public" (@joepublic3933) on "WatchMojo.com" channel.

  1. 2
  2.  @veritty6828  It does seem to be deeply rooted in our culture. Women sexualise themselves permanently; just look at most social media profile photos... It goes right through society on every level. Clothes are made figure-hugging, revealing cleavage or thigh or belly... Hang on.... stop! There's a problem there. Don't men sexualise themselves too? Look at their profile photos too. Men don't show cleavage.... but a good firm bicep or two... In movies, male heroes are usually the stereotype female fantasy of a strong man who takes no sh*t from the enemies, but is gentle with the ladies (except when she wants her hair pulled and her ass smacked)! The typical male hero quickly gets his shirt ripped, to show off his muscles, in the same way as the female heroine gets her skirt ripped off and finishes the film in her underwear. Our two bunny rabbit examples are a little different though. Bugs doesn't seem sexualised at all. Clothes do a lot of the sexualising, as well as the body form. Why are breasts so sexualised? What makes a woman's nipple unfit for youtube (although a machete attack or fatal crash is ok), but a man's is no problem? We're allowed to see the whole of the woman's breast, but not the nipple! Completely ridiculous, isn't it? Personally I think naturism is good: getting rid of clothes desexualises our bodies and makes us more equal. It forces you to accept your own body as well. Can't hide behind baggy clothes. Of course you can't be naked all the time, but it's a good experience.
    2
  3.  Maria Salinas  Unfortunately your last two replies have been deleted it would seem, so I've only seen the first bit of them, but you seem to have misread what I said: male heros in films are represented as the combination of superman who can beat all the enemies but is a perfect gentleman at the same time. You still maintain that showing cleavage is in no way sexual, which I disagree with. By the same logic, buttocks are in the same category. A plunging line like a cleavage on the buttocks would be seen how? My point is, functional clothing is not designed to reveal bits particularly, it's just there to be practical and comfortable. As soon as you start revealing more than "necessary", it changes the function of the clothing. For example, if a man is wearing a tee shirt, nothing is being "presented". Put him in a vest, and you're exposing much more of the upper arm and shoulder. He'd be seen in a different light in a meeting if he came in with bulging muscles on display. See the similarity now? What purpose does it have, for you, to wear clothes that show cleavage? I'd say it's a way of saying "hey everybody, look at this". Maybe for you, breasts have no sexual importance.... but for at least half the population they do. Even then, whether something is "sexual" or not is pretty irrelevant; it's visible, so it's something people see and therefore look at. If someone ha s beautiful hair I might well look at it during a conversation, because it's there in front of me and "nice" to look at. We are also inevitably attracted to big flashing neon signs.... but that doesn't mean they're sexual. You can go on deluding yourself that showing cleavage is uniquely for yourself (pure narcissism, then) or you can admit it's to have an effect on other people, even if it's just "oh, she looks nice". You'll notice that generally speaking, mens' clothing doesn't have holes cut out or slits or whatever to show particular parts of the body.That should tell you something.
    2
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1