Youtube comments of joe public (@joepublic3933).

  1. "So, guide, what did you learn from the American?" "Well Great Leaders, they're fat, drink Coke, smoke cigs, drink beer, touch up our women, drink beer, take the piss out of our dam, never sleep, drink beer, sing really really badly (even worse than Johnny Rotten) and think we don't notice when they're filming". "Yeah....pretty much what we imagined."
    123
  2.  @joshuawilliams7653  "people foolishly cling to every word": that's exactly what we're talking about here, people being foolish about words, without thinking about what they mean. "you seriously think reducing a current growth rate doesn't involve killing people" Yes, I seriously think that, as do any sane people. Didn't I already explain why? Do you deny what has already happened in the world? Can you tell me, with your own logical reasoning, why in Europe we have small families now? Look at demographics a bit, for f**ks sake: note the age distribution of developing countries... note how it's different to ours. These aren't new ideas invented by Gates and his evil minions; it's just how the World actually works. Since when did he become the leading expert? Since he became so rich that he could give money to the people doing the research and also get their direct advice. He's a figurehead, high profile and therefore useful for getting messages across. This works on all levels of society. Nothing special about that. If a famous actor talks about a subject for example, it doesn't make him an expert, just the one relaying the message. "What if by 2030 we hit 11 billion? Means something would have to be done." Ok, so what if? What's your suggestion then? The best way to get something done is by letting people do it of their own free will, no? Better to think about it now rather than when it's too late, isn't it? Anyway, what's wrong with the idea of improving living conditions? Pockets of the US may well be densely populated, but the US can provide, so we don't call it overpopulated. Overpopulated is when there aren't enough ressources for the population. It's simple. Use logic, think, learn maths, study history.
    38
  3.  @joshuawilliams7653  It seems to me that the ones "clinging to every word" are the conspiracy theorists, obsessed with reading stuff into a few words rather than understanding the general concepts. "Ooh! He said producing and not reducing! Must be revealing plans of genocide!"
    28
  4.  @grantjohnson5785  I've been to Spain a few times, does that count? Also, people sometimes think I'm Spanish because of my dark hair and complexion.... that sort of gives me a pass, if not a season ticket! Go ahead; reinstate Taco Tuesday, but you'll have to fight it off with the "Tutu Tuesday" crowd.
    26
  5. Yes it could sound that way..... unless of course you listen to the end of it, where he says that it's the last one, C, that has to be close to zero. Hence the title of the talk. Go on, it's less than two minutes later, you can make the effort and listen!
    20
  6.  @rosetui6070  No...it was recorded in 2010. 2020 minus 10 =2010. No wonder some people can't get to grips with the equation...
    20
  7. Je suis un homme, qui n'a pas fait d'enfant... j'ai subi le pression de la société pour en avoir... et devinez quoi? Je regrette aujourd'hui. Je n'ai pas écris un livre pourtant.
    19
  8.  Strawberry7Lynn  I didn't realise we had our own dishes in England!
    19
  9. Spot on, although you could've added that it's the country with the highest percentage of its population in prison...
    18
  10. Where are you? Playing golf.
    18
  11. Cuz you can't trust science, man! Whenever I take the plane I always bring a parachute because planes work by science.... and I don't trust science. I never drive a car, always walk; because you can't trust cars, they're science. I'll never go to a hospital if I get sick, cuz you know, science. I'll certainly never leave comments on youtube because.... you know!
    17
  12.  @joshuawilliams7653  It's kind of ironic that someone who lives their life according to one book talks about "clinging to every word".
    17
  13.  @joshuawilliams7653  Take someone's word for it just because they're rich? No. Mind you, how he got rich shows he's not exactly stupid. Expert? No. He's surrounded by them though. Probably very well advised. Only a select few think resources are getting scarce? Yeah, sure! I think the majority would agree on that actually. Are they badly distributed? Yes, definitely. Improving overall quality of health includes not letting people die of preventable diseases.... vaccines being part of that. Teach them to be efficient? Who are we to teach efficiency?! How can you teach without being "good ole big brother and imposing what we think is best"?
    16
  14.  @joshuawilliams7653  you seem obsessed with this population thing: "How about we improve overall quality of health before we try to work population numbers" When will you understand that the two go hand in hand? Improving living conditions reduces family size, so if you work on better health, you're having an effect on population growth at the same time, as a by-product, if you like. So it's not a question of choosing either working on population or on health.The two happen at the same time. By the way, I think I tried to answer some of your questions, even if they were rhetorical, so please answer some of mine.
    15
  15. These are extremists. Most liberals are not like this. Most conservatives are not white supremacists.... are they?
    15
  16. Oui: l’extrême droite. On l'a laissé se développer, ils ne se cachent plus, ils se reproduisent de façon incontrôlé...qu'on les castre tous!
    15
  17.  @Lisaakk  Actually that's not...... no.... never mind: you carry on. Sorry.
    14
  18.  @DanaConrad7  CO2 = P x S x E x C P= people S= services per person E= energy per service C = carbon dioxide per unit energy The last one, C, must come down to zero because all the others will increase, even if you slow down the rate of increase. "Innovating to zero" = creating alternative energy sources that do not produce CO2. Simple maths: anything x anything x anything x zero = zero.
    14
  19. Thank god her haircut was never taken on by a whole generation!
    13
  20. Oh dear... Karen has got it all worked out....
    11
  21.  @joshuawilliams7653  Like I said, look at what's happened in the real world.
    11
  22.  @joshuawilliams7653  I don't like the idea of microchips under the skin, much as I don't like the credit cards we already have, even if they are "convenient", but I don't think they're the work of Satan either. Just the work of over-zealous tech nerds. For me Bill Gates is the same. I certainly don't think he wants to kill anybody off; that's just deliberately misinterpreting his words, which should be clear enough for anyone, but which sadly aren't, apparently. When I see the appalling lack of logical thinking in your posts, I'm drawn to believe that you're trolling. I hope so, because if someone can't see the difference between genocide and offering free condoms, they've got serious problems.
    11
  23.  @joshuawilliams7653  "Melinda Gates went on national TV wearing an inverted cross. That tells someone like me all I need to know" ....yep: that just about sums it up.
    11
  24.  @philippedupoint8722  Je serai curieux de connaître vos origines...J’espère que en faisant une tel commentaire vous êtes au moins certain d'avoir des ancêtres gaulois sur plusieurs générations? Personnellement, je suis anglais, alors pour moi, vous les français êtes tous des bronzés... littéralement!
    11
  25. And thankfully EVIL ANTICHRIST BABY KILLER Bill Gates set up microsoft so that we can use Windows to upload those same videos!!
    11
  26. Well done. You should've learnt also in school that naturally, it's a pretty closed system: plants pump out oxygen, take in CO2. The difference is that now humans are creating an excess of CO2 by their industrial and agricultural activity.
    10
  27.  @joshuawilliams7653  There's a bit of a difference between "not kill instantly" and not kill at all..You're right about one thing; people would freak out if we went from 7 billion to five.... so the tactic of letting the population increase is a very cunning one... so cunning that it seems like what it is; an increase. Worthy of Baldrick: a cunning plan that cannot fail!
    10
  28.  @joshuawilliams7653  Hang out with a Bible basher? Yikes! Run away!!
    10
  29. No, no! It's a heinous crime. Pass the salt, would you?
    10
  30.  @SAN-yb6yz  For f**ks sake! Don't you think I've listened to his interviews? He does not say he wants to reduce world population! Everyoe is citing the same TED talk of 2010 where he talks about reducing population growth! He explains clearly in other interviews. What's your problem? Why deny this? Post your links; saying "no, youtube will take them down" is total rubbish. It's because you have no proof.
    9
  31.  @joshuawilliams7653  I don't see an inverted cross; I just see a rather blurred image and a photoshopped blowup.
    9
  32. No. He says nothing of the sort. That's why nobody hears it, apart from a few paranoid catholics who can't even be bothered to quote whole sentences properly.
    9
  33.  @noelmurray1  Are you a Murican, by any chance?
    8
  34. Why do you consider it to be objectification?
    8
  35.  @blackwaterdvr1  Well at least make sure you understand what they're talking about before spreading bullshit.
    8
  36. You are free to do so... and you should post pictures.
    8
  37.  @philippedupoint8722  Je suis anglais, en France depuis plus de vingt ans, parfaitement intégré, merci.Assez intégré pour connaître les formes de politesse que VOUS ne connaissez pas, apparemment. :)
    8
  38. J'aimerai entendre quelqu'un lire un discours entièrement en écriture inclusive! Carrément impossible à écouter...
    8
  39. Boycottons ces débats ridicules!
    8
  40. My dad was in Bananarama :(
    7
  41.  @DanaConrad7  The thing you can't seem to grasp is that he never says he wants to reduce the population. His entire point is about even if you slow down the growth a little ( note: no reduction, just slowing growth) it won't change much in the way of CO2 emissions.......... So....... (drum roll) You need to bring down the CO2 emissions from industry down to zero!!!! That is the whole point. "Innovating towards zero". Sounds familiar.......... Oh, wait! It's the title!
    7
  42.  @rustyshackleford7265  That's not how it works mate. You make a claim, you back it up. If you don't, you're the lazy one. Imagine if science worked like that? "No, it's my toy I'm not sharing, do your own research!" If the world's scientists functioned in that way, we'd still be in the Dark Ages. Of course, it happens, but luckily for us most are willing to share what they know. Knowledge should be shared: if you're not willing to share where yours comes from, we can safely assume you're lying through your teeth.
    7
  43. Went in a bar in Belgium at lunchtime, called the "Europeans' Bar".... had a drink.... didn't get thrown out. Looks like Brexit hasn't changed anything much for me yet.
    6
  44.  @humanyoda  Enjoying life IS being successful, isn't it? At least, it's one way of being successful. Being rich is nothing to do with success in life. Just succeeding in making money. Helping others is success. Being happy is success.
    6
  45.  @AyrtonTwigg  He doesn't think vaccines will reduce the population. Where'd you get that idea from? Or am I misunderstanding you? Just in case though (or for anyone else): Bill Gates explains concept : does saving more lives lead to overpopulation ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obRG-2jurz0 Stage three demographic transition ( or why population increase slows down with better living conditions): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition#Stage_three Improvement in world health and living conditions : https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview https://ourworldindata.org/a-history-of-global-living-conditions-in-5-charts
    6
  46.  @tw5271  Sorry but do you have any actual information, or do you base your entire life on hearsay?
    6
  47.  @joshuawilliams7653  so how come in ten years he hasn't actually managed to kill anyone? Seems like the population insists on going up still...
    6
  48.  @DanaConrad7  He predicted it at least five years ago, if not more. As for the simulation, would it have been less strange to you if it was 3 months or 6 months before, or a year or two years or 666 days before?
    6
  49.  @rudy103069  pathetic
    6
  50. Great isn't it? The number of people who say "this isn't a debate- she's just reading notes!" They've obviously gone a long way these scholars.... not far enough though to understand that before having a debate, someone needs to say something to debate about! They must think a debate is just people shouting at each other at the same time. Then again, this is understandable, as it's what is often shown on TV, especially when it comes to politics!
    6
  51.  @philippedupoint8722  étudiez l'histoire de votre pays un peu .Ne vous inquiétez pas; c'est la même histoire que tous les autres pays- un succession de migrations, colonisations, invasions... "français de souche " n'existe pas, c'est pour ça que vous n'avez pas tous la même tête: ça c'est consanguinité et il n'y a pas de quoi être fier de ça!
    6
  52. Well that was indeed an underwhelming comment. So, as far as you're concerned, it's ok to go to war and kill/be killed at 18, but not to make love? You can drive a car (potential killing machine), but not have sex? You can go out and earn money to support a family... but you can't have a family? Someone who is 15 is automatically raped by her boyfriend who's two days older?
    5
  53. L'ironie est juste magnifique, non?! J'ai mon masque spéciale "gilet jaune"!
    5
  54. HE tried to run because he'd just been shot... just saying!
    5
  55.  Jody Owen  Dear Karen, nobody asked, but some of us like not being ignorant, so we're happy to learn! You should be too.
    5
  56.  @smaudia6003  trop de chocolat et tu claques aussi. Faut il l'interdire? Le ski fait plus de ravages chez les jeunes..... on l'interdit?
    5
  57.  V I R T E X  Alors l'air est solide ou liquide? Non, c'est gaz. Composé de : 21 % de dioxygène, de 78 % de diazote et de 1 % d'autres gaz ( vapeur d'eau, méthane, ozone, dioxyde de carbone, etc).
    5
  58.  @olivierapave9695  Non, il semblerait qu'il est mort parce qu'il a pris un gaz pour nettoyer son ordi.Tu peux passer plusieurs minutes sans oxygène, pour en mourir il faut y aller... C'est comme l'alcool et le javel: les deux sont des liquides. Si quelqu'un boit du javel, on interdit l'alcool?
    5
  59.  @JuliaJulia-iv1uc  So you're a freelance graphic designer? I applaud your forward-thinking, when you planned your career to be able to work from home during a pandemic! How on Earth did you know in advance that you should work from home? Or was it just a stroke of luck? Imagine: you could've picked a silly job like....I don't know....restaurant owner, and been stuck for two months with staff to pay and zero income. But instead, you get to carry on working from the comfort of your own home and have free time to languish in your armchair and criticise those who've had a hard time of a worldwide situation.
    5
  60.  @DanaConrad7  You didn't even listen to the end of the equation, did you? You have understood absolutely nothing.
    5
  61. Evil? No. Just showing how stupid people can be. Take it as a lesson.
    5
  62. Maybe he didn't. Now he does. Is that a problem?
    5
  63. Convenient? There's nothing "convenient" about how the climate works...
    5
  64.  @H43339  Whoops; you're right, I misread your first comment. My bad. Just goes to show; always read the question twice, right kids?!
    4
  65. They don't decrease the population. They decrease the population growth. He says it if you listen to the end of his phrase. And the one being brought down to zero is the last one. For the rest, Arif C has summed it up already.
    4
  66. Anything to back that up?
    4
  67.  @jeannabug94  I asked you if you had sources. So obviously you haven't. I know you haven't anyway because I've seen his other conferences. What is wrong with so many people that they can't understand simple English? Forget a second about putting your interpretation on his words and think about what he actually says. "6.8 billion going up to 9". How is that reducing population? I was never that good at maths in school, but I do know that 9 is bigger than 6.8.
    4
  68.  @joebidenisapedophile  https://africacheck.org/fbcheck/25-years-on-rumour-by-us-anti-contraceptive-organisation-still-damages-tetanus-vaccine-programmes/ Don't go mad because it's Africacheck; read the links.
    4
  69. Next time try watching on a big screen and see if you can spot the guy that drops his colour card in the final exravaganza.... That'll beat your depression!
    4
  70.  @squallymedal8516  You should be careful before saying what's "factually incorrect".... Animals do abort intentionally. Here's one example, but you can google it to find plenty more: https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/the-bruce-effect-why-some-pregnant-monkeys-abort-when-new-males-arrive So it's a "fact" that the foetus is alive, but it is not a "fact" that the "mother is being selfish": there can be many reasons for abortion. Do you think women should be unwilling baby factories? "Her body, her choice" is not "factually incorrect": it's an ethical standpoint, therefore cannot be considered factual or not.Whether you agree or not is irrelevant. There's no fact or fiction for such an argument. And that's a fact....!
    4
  71.  @squallymedal8516  You didn't read my post properly. I said there's no point in arguing about what's purely an ethical point of view because you won't change your mind. What I say is also that your opinion doesn't matter anyway, nor does mine. The only opinion that really matters is the mothers. I'll complete the sentence if you like, but it changes nothing.If a woman wants to abort, she will do it, whether legal or not, whether she has to travel to another state/country to do it or not. "it's OK to kill a baby in the womb when it's your womb and your baby, when for whatever reason you think you are not willing or able to give it a loving home". You think that sounds bad? Tough. Not your choice. Now, remember that what's considered "rape" goes beyond the stalker in the park and often occurs within marriage, so now finish my sentence: "I think it's ok to force girls and women to have successive pregnancies because..." You could also acknowledge that you were completely wrong about lack of examples in the animal kingdom; it would be polite.
    4
  72. Interesting.... but I think there's a place for humour and irreverence pretty much anywhere. Take for example the Whitehouse correspondents dinner... In British parliament there's also a tradition of humour; a speech, whatever the subject (or mostly) can be enlivened and made more memorable by injecting a bit of humour. Natural human thing: in such places as parliament where people are in the middle of debates all day (or night) long, humour provides a welcome, even necessary break. Doesn't take away from the important stuff, but rather contributes. In this particular case, bringing comedy into such an environment serves also as a demonstration of how it could collapse as a system if the discipline is not respected. Comedy is nearly always useful and here is no exception. That was my opening speech....
    4
  73.  @spacemonkey1776  "all medication outside of vaccines may be held liable" Yes.... but not vaccines because they're so widespread. I said so earlier and explained why. "Some of the healthiest people I know have not been vaccinated" Can be read as "some of the luckiest people I know are still alive"; they're lucky because they didn't get exposed to mortal diseases, or lucky because everyone around them is vaccinated thus protecting them... "if you want to take vaccines this is America" Not for me it isn't; this is Europe. I must admit we have less obligatory vaccines than you guys, but that's political not medical. "when other people call out their BS don't get upset with him and call him conspiracy theorist. That's like someone telling you the sky is blue and you calling them a conspiracy theorist" No... not at all: if you call out someone you must have evidence against them. If someone says the sky is blue, they can show you evidence to support their claim. If they say the earth is flat, however, they need more than b*llsh*t youtube videos to convince anyone, they need some really hard evidence. " Everybody knows vaccines are not safe." What does "safe" mean? 100% sure? No, you're right, they're not. Maybe they're just better than nothing at all... Are car seatbelts 100% safe? No, but you've got way more chances of surviving an accident if you're wearing one. The "conspiracy theorist" is someone who connects dots that aren't necessarily linked and doesn't have actual evidence to back up their claims. Is Bill Gates all good? Maybe not... but bring on some real evidence please to show that what he's doing is bad.
    4
  74.  @barbied3034  Haha I get your point: guilty as charged! But.... and it's a big but.... It's a very difficult subject isn't it? A question of ethics, one which hasn't been resolved really anywhere in the world. I don't consider abortion to be baby killing, so I won't call it that. That's why I said "terminating pregnancy". The interpretation of when life begins is a very fuzzy line. It's the same with war, and the justification thereof. Is it ethical to send our children to fight in foreign countries and die for OUR ideals, not necessarily theirs? Is it ethical to kill anyone because of your beliefs? Maybe not. So you can't justify having an army (oversimplified I know, but you get the point). Is it ethical to eat meat? Some think not.... Should we all stop eating meat because of their beliefs? Murder seems unethical.... yet many countries have the death penalty for murder! That's quite a paradox! Is it ethical to kill fetuses (or unborn babies, if you prefer)? Some say yes, some say no. So who gets to decide? Maybe the mother is the best one to let decide, nobody else.
    4
  75.  @barbied3034  See? We agree! I as a man refuse to decide what's allowed or not for a woman with regards to what happens inside her body! I think nobody should be allowed to decide. If it went well for you, that's cool, but plenty aren't in your situation. Sorry but I don't believe in your God, so certainly don't give him supreme rights over everyone. "You can't say killing can be good based on morals" Yes I can. I can say it's bad too. Do you support your soldiers off fighting heroically in foreign lands? I don't. Bombing towns and cities full of civilians is not my idea of a good cause. Does the end justify the means? Tricky...... another one of those moral questions! Too easy to say "let God decide". No; we're here in this together, so we as a society have to decide.
    4
  76.  @bleuettelaure5017  En quoi c'est dérangeant de savoir la religion de quelqu'un en les regardant? On peut afficher nos croyances politiques, on peut afficher nos préférences sexuelles, on peut afficher tous qu'on veut en fait.... sauf religion. Je suis athée, j'ai du mal à comprendre comment des gens peuvent encore croire en un bonhomme dans le ciel qui nous regarde et qui a besoin d’être adoré, mais ça ne me pose pas de problèmes qu'ils affichent ça, temps qu'ils n'essayent pas de dire aux enfants que les dinosaures cohabitaient avec l'homme des cavernes. La laïcité est fait surtout pour empêcher la religion de gouverner le peuple avec des idées sans fondement scientifique , et non pour décider comment ils doivent s'habiller.
    4
  77. What, you mean they're actually getting stuff done? While everyone was at home saturating the networks? I can see why you'd find that suspicious!
    4
  78.  @rosetui6070  Well that's convenient isn't it? I know; let's stop supporting charities while we're at it, after all, it's God who decides everything, not us. I think I'll start chucking all my rubbish on the floor as well. See someone getting attacked in the underground at night? Don't bother doing anything; God will decide what to do, if anything.
    4
  79. Erm..... no, he doesn't say that. You've even been given the text in the video, and you still can't get it? Wow...
    4
  80. @We Spartacus Y'all hear that? FACTS, because it's in capital letters so it MUST BE TRUE!
    4
  81.  @Capncheeks  Ok that's reasonable.
    4
  82.  @nubianeagle8634  Which country would that be? Anyway, whatever the country, not all conservatives are white supremacists are they? I mean... plenty of conservatives aren't even white, let alone supremacist!
    4
  83.  king c1337z  sigh....
    4
  84.  @chihiroogino7464  Don't you mean "people who think they're the only ones that can sense emotions when they walk in a room"?!
    4
  85.  @SonGoku-xz4zv  Je ne suis pas l'exception; les immigrés bien intégrés on ne les voit même pas. On ne voit qu'un petit nombre bruyant, ultra-mediatisé. Les maghrébins dans mon village jouent à la pétanque et mangent du saucisson! Je ne dis pas que tout le monde doit faire pareil, juste que il n'y a pas que des ghettos radicalisés dans la vie. Le IRA à tué beaucoup plus de monde en Angleterre dans les années 80, surtout à Londres, que les Islamistes aujourd'hui, mais on ne cherchaient pas à stigmatiser tous les Catholiques Irlandais. Les blanc-suprémacistes pareil aux États Unis...Quand on s'attaque trop à une population, ils risquent de finir par se radicaliser par reflex d'auto défense.
    4
  86.  @alexioforte397  Do I find anything creepy about 060606 in the middle of another string of numbers and letters ( by the way it's WO2020060606A1)? No. I don't. Am I a paid shill (not shrill as you say)? I could say no.... but how much do I get paid to say that? After all, saying this stuff for 3 people on youtube must have a huge impact on the world, and must therefore be worth a lot of money, so I might just lie to you... But in the meantime, while you think about your reply, read this comment that I've posted on a few discussions about Bill Gates and remember to adjust your reply accordingly: My predicted conversation with any conspiracy theorist: Here's what will happen, if we debate a bit: You'll say "Bill Gates wants to kill half the population, he was chucked out of India, Melinda is a man." I'll ask you for your sources, you'll either say "google it" or "do your own research" or "I don't give links anymore," or « follow the money », or "watch the Corbett report" or you'll just carry on spouting random rubbish. Then I'll give you my sources, which clearly show you're wrong, but you'll refuse to read (yes READ, not watch, sorry!), saying it's all just biased reports paid by "Big Pharma". Conveniently for you, everything which doesn't go in your sense is sponsored by Bill Gates, including me and anyone else who disagrees with you. Since "almost all media" is apparently funded by Gates (funny how it includes media from every single country in the world), except what's on youtube (which is ironic because it's mainly thanks to him that we're on youtube in the first place), it's impossible to provide you with any evidence. Yet you will ask repeatedly, saying mine isn't good enough without giving any yourself. You will spout on about how evil he is, with lots of CAPITAL LETTERS (you're probably catholic, so I can understand that anyone who promotes contraception is evil to you, since you haven't evolved from the Dark Ages), and completely ignore anything I say. When I ask if at the very least you use Linux and not Windows, you won't reply. Am I wrong?
    4
  87. I get it... but people don't always find it easy to move away from their home...
    4
  88. Ça serait bien de donner le lien pour qu'on puisse voir... si c'est pas censuré par youtube!
    4
  89. I don't know....the title of the damn talk should be clear enough...
    3
  90.  @kevinjuniorgarciadelgado6948  30% is still a lot... You wouldn't deny that we need to preserve it, would you?
    3
  91.  @jeremiahhosea1140  fact- my father sold stationary. fact- Bill Gates has glasses fact- some child rapists have glasses fact- you or I may well have already met pedophiles, and may even have got on well with them. Who knows? fact- man didn't walk on the moon. fact- man did walk on the moon.
    3
  92.  @Seapin1  But it's tRuE! The world WILL end in 2012!! Oh.... hang on a minute... You do realise it's 2012 according to the re-edited Pict calendar?
    3
  93. Well you should've listened to the talk, instead of basing your views on what other people told you he said. ... but then again, why bother worrying about truth when your mind is already made up?
    3
  94. My predicted conversation with any conspiracy theorist: Here's what will happen, if we debate a bit: You'll say "Bill Gates wants to kill half the population, he was chucked out of India, Melinda is a man." I'll ask you for your sources, you'll either say "google it" or "do your own research" or "I don't give links anymore," or "watch the Corbett report" or you'll just carry on spouting random rubbish. Then I'll give you my sources, which clearly show you're wrong, but you'll refuse to read (yes READ, not watch, sorry!), saying it's all just biased reports paid by "Big Pharma". Conveniently for you, everything which doesn't go in your sense is sponsored by Bill Gates, including me and anyone else who disagrees with you. Since "almost all media" is apparently funded by Gates (funny how it includes media from every single country in the world), except what's on youtube (which is ironic because it's mainly thanks to him that we're on youtube in the first place), it's impossible to provide you with any evidence. Yet you will ask repeatedly, saying mine isn't good enough without giving any yourself. You will spout on about how evil he is, with lots of CAPITAL LETTERS (you're probably catholic, so I can understand that anyone who promotes contraception is evil to you, since you haven't evolved from the Dark Ages), and completely ignore anything I say. When I ask if at the very least you use Linux and not Windows, you won't reply. Am I wrong?
    3
  95.  @hashdashzz9448  Oh... so you've got no idea in fact you just saw it on facebook?
    3
  96.  @jeannabug94  I'm curious to see your sources. When does Bill Gates say he wants to depopulate the planet? 6.8 billion going up to around 9..... doesn't sound like depopulation to me. By the way, snopes is very useful for its sources: you don't have to believe their slant on things, just as you don't have to believe videos by random youtubers. The only important thing is the sources cited: that gives you the opportunity to check yourself and formulate your own opinion. Snopes is useful for that. Now, where are your sources?
    3
  97.  @jeannabug94  For f**ks sake listen to him! I can't argue this one any more if you're not willing to listen.
    3
  98. How can you expect people to have good sex naturally if they're not educated about it? Every single thing we do in life can be improved if we learn more about it.
    3
  99. Vous voulez peut être qu'on l'attaque sur son apparence? Non; c'est un débat censé être intellectuel, alors si l'une des deux n'a pas le niveau, on critique. D'ailleurs, vous verrez qu'on critique aussi beaucoup le modérateur, qui fait mal son travail, et les cadreurs qui nous mettent des lumières dans la gueule en arrière plan des deux invités! On critique chacun sur son rôle dans ce débat. Si les commentaires sont "presque tous rédigés par des hommes", c'est probablement parce que les femmes n'ont pas laissé des commentaires. C'est donc une inégalité crée par....les femmes. En quoi est ce que " le contenu de la vidéo () illustre finalement les propos de Louise"?
    3
  100. youtubeuse, parce que Brice est masculin!
    3
  101. Par curiosité, si un homme musulman accompagne ses enfants en sortie scolaire, va-t-on lui demander de se raser la barbe? On va peut-être dire que non, la barbe n'est pas forcement signe d'appartenance religieuse.... mais au même temps, un foulard sur la tête non plus. C'est ou alors l’égalité homme-femme du quel on parle autant?
    3
  102. It's all good fun.... and sometimes even worth while! Alpinists unite!
    3
  103.  @antoinec1097  Je pense que effectivement, si le butane était bon à inhaler, on aurait tous fait plus de camping dans nos jeunesses!
    3
  104.  @sofbensi6581  Ouais... au moins notre génération utilisait des seringues!
    3
  105.  @akloppthebest3175  là, t'as trop tiré sur des ballons avant de répondre. "tu me fais marcher là pk je mentire prêtre ta raison" Non.... j'essaye.... mais je ne comprends rien. D’où sort le prêtre dans tout ça?!
    3
  106.  @parabpbpbp  Ok, so I've seen this documentary ages ago, so I can't remember much in the way of details. So to reply to you, I went straight to the transcripts on the site, to check through quickly for an example. So first episode; lots of info on where the money goes to, with lots of sources (mainly directly the Gates Foundation)... no worries, except for a rather biased vocabulary in the narration ( e.g. "flashy projects" or something like that). The first really interesting bit is how much they've given to Monsanto. The source is given, I click on it.... https://www.democracynow.org/2010/8/27/headlines/gates_foundation_criticized_for_increasing_monsanto_investment ... and get a headline in a web newspaper.Nothing more. Just the headline! That's what I call a very vague source. What would I consider a good source for that? Some peer reviewed economics journal maybe, that had a report with figures...some actual data. That's just one example, but so happens to be the first. Up til then, it was all just a turn of phrase to make perfectly normal stuff sound sinister.So when your first real bit of detective work (the rest is just quoting from the Gates Foundation site) is based on a headline, it sort of discredits all that will follow!
    3
  107.  @parabpbpbp  You're forgetting a small but important detail: the world extends beyond America. Do you really think that all the governments, all the scientific communities, all the practitioners of medicine, all of the pharmaceutical companies whether they be major or not, would participate, together, in one big happy family, in a huge cover-up perpetrated by a few wealthy western families? I'm afraid my view of the world is slightly more cynical! Hollywood stars are the proof of stuff going on? I'm sure they're a highly decadent bunch, practicing all sorts of filthy satanic bare-bottomed silliness. I'm sure there's a few real nasty perverts too.I'm sure they're in all walks of life. Let's hope the police weed them out; it's their job. There'll always be corruption, too....but none of this requires some sinister global coordination to happen.Which in a way makes it harder to deal with. Spreading lies and unfounded gossip does not help target the real issues. As you may have guessed, I don't believe in God either!
    3
  108. They have been asked and they say yes. Others say no.... so it's up to them to prove there's a lie.
    3
  109.  @linnea4079  If you're scaring someone by approaching them, maybe it just means they had a bad experience and it's not your fault at all...
    3
  110.  @sindrevangenrobberstad2889  "The KIng"? Elvis is in Norwegia (or whatever it's called) as well?!
    3
  111.  @MarvFitBikesKicks  It does make sense, doesn't it? Maybe it's not the whole picture (he doesn't really go into contraception, for example), but it's a whole different story to what people are saying on youtube videos. There's an awful lot of deceiving titles and editing out there! Another thing you'll here about is his foundation being chucked out of India. That was easy to check up on too: https://pib.gov.in/newsite/mbErel.aspx?relid=158277 Even the Indian government was fed up with the rumours, so they released a statement themselves! I haven't finished delving into all that's said about him, but if it's anything like the first two things I come across.......get what I mean?!
    3
  112.  @spacemonkey1776  Well no, I don't consider abortion to be genocide for a start, and what on Earth would that have to do with Bill Gates? Surely each act of "murder" is the responsibility of the mother.... so individual cases.... so no genocide. I can't argue the case for abortion with you; it's purely ethical, there is no right or wrong. If you believe it's murder then ok, but in no way can it be genocide, and in no way is one person responsible for it. Also, where do you get your 60 million from?
    3
  113.  @spacemonkey1776  Yeah... that's your view. A bit too simplistic though: I think pretty much all governments are guilty of killing people one way or another. Genocide is a very specific thing and I really don't see how a mother killing her baby, if that's how you want to call it, can be guilty of genocide. Many countries have the death penalty. Some vegans believe meat-eating is murder. When does life begin? Morals and ethics change with time: we no longer consider it to be ethical to marry at fourteen. I say let the mother decide: why should you or I have the right to decide for her what's ethical or not?
    3
  114.  @spacemonkey1776  I don't know much about laws in your country, but wasn't that all about aborting in case it risked the mother's life?
    3
  115.  @spacemonkey1776  Funny how you said it's ok to eat animals because they're part of the food chain... implying that what's natural is ok. How about this then; some animals regulate their population by voluntary abortion or even eating their babies. Humans are part of the food chain, so can do the same thing, no? You deciding it's ok to eat meat is dependent on your personal set of morals. A vegan may well have a different set of morals.
    3
  116.  @susimeier891  Yawn... Yeah, that's right, I'm paid to make comments! How does your maths work? Where do you get the idea that he's proud to kill 15% of people? Do please explain your logic.Bearing in mind that in the ten years since he said it, the population has increased by a billion...
    3
  117. ​ @luciamul7187  This is me stepping in the middle: Ok he's apologised, shake his hand Lucia, shake his hand. We're all good. Let's spark up a reefer and reminisce about Led Zeppelin. I will anyway, whether you guys join me or not.
    3
  118. Source?
    3
  119.  @sanyonazyin6063  I suppose those weights are what you can go to jail for in America? Let's look at just one, that I know a little about: marijuana plants. 100 plants may seem like a lot, but if you're planting natural seeds, about a quarter may turn out to be male and therefore have to be removed. You can't do this until they've reached a certain stage of maturity. Some more may get eaten: first slugs and snails, then rabbits, then deer... Some just won't really grow properly and may die off. Of the 100 you started off with, you're lucky if 50 make it. How big they get depends on where you are; climate, soil type, sunlight, water. If you're a "heavy smoker", you'll need quite a few to get you through the year, and if you're a group of friends cultivating together because one of you happens to have enough room, you end up being considered as some huge dealer whilst you're just having a smoke with your friends. Does that merit jail? In some states it's completely legal, and in some it's not. Bad luck for you if you're caught in a state where it's not. Doesn't make you a worse person though.You're the same, whatever State you're in (yes, pun unavoidable). How many are in prison, basically for the crime of farming?
    3
  120.  @katdevona6127  "take a vaccine off someone with no medical background".....are you serious?!!!!! Do you think Bill Gates has put on a labcoat and set up a lab in his living room? He FUNDS scientists that create vaccines. They're specialists, not him. He's just got money.
    3
  121.  @pot4017  Yeah, that's why we even have a word for it: dumpling!
    3
  122.  @erynchristophe4297  Sinon tu parles Français un peu? On pourrait peut être comprendre tes phrases...
    3
  123.  @JuliaJulia-iv1uc  Don't criticise somebody's "quoting skills" and then forget to put in apostrophes everywhere and add random capital letters. If you don't know how to write, don't criticise others for it.
    3
  124.  king c1337z  Looks like there's no hope for humanity when people can't understand simple logic... Learn at least to listen to the end of a phrase.
    3
  125.  @nerdnairbnordnirbu9044  What are you going on about? "by lowering population growth. If the population decreases human life will be better and less people will be poor and suffer": You contradict yourself by referring to population growth and population decrease! If you reduce population growth, the population still grows, but more slowly: it doesn't decrease. " The best population number is 2 billion worldwide. Anything more or less causes problems and makes life worse for everyone." Where does your 2 billion come from? We're at 7.8 billion and there's enough of everything for everyone.... it's just a problem of distribution. Some like to hoard and don't share. If you have some sources to justify such a claim, I'd be curious to see them.
    3
  126.  @francekroondijk3159  Makes you think though.... Maybe if the masks were equipped with tubes going to a 20L jerrycan strapped to your back, that way you could exhale into the jerrycan, thus stocking the CO2, which could then be collected (I suggest Thursday mornings, but that's a detail that would have to be sorted out), compressed, and sent to space where it could be let out harmlessly into the wide open universe. CO2 deflector balloons could even be set up around the globe so that meteorites could be bounced off, preventing them from ever hitting the Earth and making those apocalyptic predictions come true. I think it'd be easy enough to set up.
    3
  127.  @ohioiyboi3875  Don't you guys have any other parties to vote for?
    3
  128. 10:30 to 10:35 is very revealing on what separates the two sides...
    3
  129.  allana  Question for you: is working in a coal mine empowering to men? I think you'll agree that no, it's not. It's dangerous, it will probably kill you, it will certainly wear your body out, it's just a job. Not a nice one, but a job. A job does not have to be empowering. You won't go putting it on display in the career exhibition hall either. Maybe "career choice" is an inappropriate term; "job choice" would be better: takes away the image of promoting prostitution in schools! You cannot cut off the demand, so the supply will also continue to exist; that's harsh reality. If you legalise, just like the alcohol industry for example, you can control it and divert police attention to other areas. Much of a moonshine problem in Europe or the States? You can only reduce trafficking by legalising and regulating.It's logical: in a legal brothel where a prostitute can take you to the police (or rather the bouncer, just like in a nightclub, he's the middle-man between offender and police, maintaining order and protecting the others) if you brutalise her, you'll think twice before being violent. Also, why not, I say that sex work can be and could be more skill orientated. It's our attitude towards it that makes it seem bad, but think about the Japanese geishas, for instance, for whom sexual practice was only a part of their social skills. They've always been highly respected and respectable... How about boxing? People destroying each other while crowds watch on. Isn't it good though that it's legal? Does it being "respectable" mean that young impressionable boys (or girls) will be drawn into it despite themselves, thinking it's easy money? Maybe some.... but they were sufficiently brainless to start with that a few more brain cells knocked out of them won't make much difference. Some will always be exploited of course, but they would've been if it was all underground anyway, but there'd be no medical support, no retirement, no handicap benefits etc etc.
    3
  130. Erm... yes, he was unarmed. If you consider that fleeing from people trying to shoot you (they did shoot him before he got back in the car and fled) equates to being armed, then you've got some serious problems with the English language!
    3
  131. ""joe public ooh its cOnsPiRacy! lol"" See? THEY censored your reply.......(and a good job THEY did: you can't just let people mix up their capital letters like that)! I just copied it for posterity. WaKe uP sHeePle!
    3
  132.  @BrianSmith-vl7xu  Actually, I think there are quite a lot of them. I know a few myself. Quite worrying really; otherwise intelligent people that even shared those "people dropping dead at Wuhan videos"...
    3
  133.  @BrianSmith-vl7xu  Very easy apparently!
    3
  134. Je crois que en générale les points relais gagnent que dalle avec ça.
    3
  135.  @privetbra53  Voila. J'en avais discuté avec une commerçante de ça, et elle pensait arrêter parce qu'elle passe plus de temps à gérer des colis que son magasin, et ça lui rapporte rien dans un petit village. C'est dans les villages que finissent beaucoup de colis qui devraient être livrés à domicile. Même quand on paye pour le livraison, les livreurs ne veulent pas aller jusqu'aux maisons éloignées et mentent, disant que t'étais absente quand ils passaient...
    3
  136. No he doesn't. Listen again.
    3
  137. What's evil?
    3
  138. Victim of what? Is it "normal"? Maybe not. Does everything have to be "normal" in life? I reckon 99.9% of men wouldn't mind the question at all, many would welcome it, and even if they said no, they'd do it with a polite laugh and look to not upset the woman they were refusing. Consider also that (as many others have commented), even if it's in the workplace and therefore inappropriate, we're talking about a comedian, living mainly on the road, in a nd out of hotels, towns.... when you're touring everywhere is the workplace. If you're working on a show, chances are it's nearly 24/7 as well: in this business people don't work 9 to 5, so there's no clear limit to what the workplace is and when it stops. Is it normal and ok that I have to put up with women flashing their breasts at me permanently, in every single environment, every single day of the year? Answer: yes, it is; I just have to deal with it if I find that part of their anatomy exciting. Do they have to show it? No, they don't. Clothes that don't reveal cleavage exist. Do they ask my consent before shoving it in my face? No. Now, did Louis shove anything in anyone's face? No; he asked, and didn't do it if the reply was no. Were there also rumours around him tht if you refused his advances he would trash your career? No, apparently not. Point: "a woman shouldn't even have to deal with a question like that" : this portrays women as being such weak and feeble individuals that they can't be expected to handle simple questions, yet they are strong and empowered enough to sexualise their own bodies as much as they want, without asking consent from any man........ weird double standards.
    2
  139. So, what's your point? Do you actually see some kind of a problem with Event 201?! Do you think we should not be prepared for catastrophies?
    2
  140. You're a fool for posting conspiracy nonsense.
    2
  141.  @eeeaten  You're right; that's exactly what I thought!
    2
  142.  @jessedew26  Good links, thanks! If I place more faith in scientific analysis, I agree also that sometimes there can be conflict of interest. Less though than your average newspaper article or even worse, youtube video. There's always some different interpretation possible as well. With regards to the deaths dropping off before vaccines, of course sanitary conditions have a considerable effect too... the WHO published this: ttps://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/initiative/detection/immunization_misconceptions/en/index1.html Can they be trusted? Don't know.... but they have data too.... Maybe we should all trust the WHO with this data: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHhrZgojY1Q
    2
  143.  @holyspirit-budda-nirvana  Refusing to conceive? Do you mean as in birth control? Yeah.... that's been talked about a lot. Try getting onto the Pope about that for a start; the Catholic church is responsible for a whole lot of misery in the world!
    2
  144.  @Svetkoshka  True, but isn't palm oil one of the main causes of deforestation ?
    2
  145.  @deansheridan  Well you don't want to go round spreading that idea: people will end up saying the rainforests don't matter!
    2
  146.  @eightpointcross4947  One of them said this to me: « regardless of what is being written is true or not. I just follow my guts » Nara Perry . Pretty much sums it up really!
    2
  147.  @jeremiahhosea1140  Correct me if I'm wrong , but isn't that book about the treatment of slaves and how they were experimented upon by James Sims? So Gates Snr was a Eugenicist... a term which has mutated from its origins anyway, but still has the power to create unease, due to its sharing of certain Nazi ideals, mainly. Just because some ideas have roots in dubious places does not make all of them bad: isn't contraception a good concept? I think it is. I'd have hundreds of children by now if it weren't for contraception, so I'm all for it! Is it reasonable to think that the world population can't just go up forever? I think it is. If those are "eugenicist" concepts, then I'm a eugenicist, and so is Bill Gates. But in reality, only a part of the eugenicist philosophy is shared. Gates has no medical credentials: this is true, so we can ask ourselves why he is where he is today: probably because he is immensely rich, so he can put his money where his mouth is, unlike most of us, and get stuff done rather than waiting round for governments to eventually sit round a table and decide to do things ten years later. Being a mediatised figure, it's his face that crops up all the time, even if the information comes from those who advise him. I expect that with all the connections he has, he's pretty well advised. When you see how government ministers are shuffled up and moved round, so that you demand where their competence comes from to occupy that post, it's less shocking to me that Gates occupy such a role because at least he's been consistent! So yeah, he's no doctor, but I think the doctors probably point him in the directions he takes. Epstein: well, lots of people have met Epstein, I'd imagine. Maybe many met him a whole lot of times.... but does that make them pedophiles? You need more than just: "Bill Gates met with with convicted child-rapist Jeffrey Epstein on "numerous occasions" according to the New York Times" to actually conclude anything. So basically, you've joined some dots which don't necessarily have any reason to be joined. Everything is linked to everything else if you really want to go far enough... that's ecology for you. All that to say that a list of statements means nothing.
    2
  148.  @underwhelmingcomments7910  True, I don't know your stance on that. What about the rest though? You say they should wait until their twenties ideally, which I find ridiculous.That's why I gave a list, not just war. So what about the rest? As for the 15 and 16 year old, do you really think it goes from rape to making love in the space of two days? Morally I mean, not legally.There is no actual change in maturity in that time after all...
    2
  149. After seeing much misinformation and ridiculous comments on youtube videos on Bill Gates, his intentions and the role of healthcare generally in the world, have a look at this, for a positive and lighthearted, clearly explained view on the world population problems: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LyzBoHo5EI And for those who came here because of THAT equation..... listen til the end: the part of the equation he wants to bring down to zero is the last one!
    2
  150. It's good music.... but needs more cowbell.
    2
  151. He as in Him? God? Well technically if he does exist (which nothing proves he does, by the way), then yes, it's Him who engineered all this. Another good reason not to believe in Him.
    2
  152. Je me suis souvent posé la même question...
    2
  153.  @imjustadog1897  What, are you suggesting they tell him why they're there? For God's sake man! You can't just go round telling people why they're being arrested; all hell would break loose! People might end up knowing what was happening, and you don't want things like reason to come spoiling all the fun now, do you?!
    2
  154. I'm still waiting for the 4G where I live!
    2
  155.  @alliancefrancaise4895  You sound like you really know what you're talking about... can you share some of your sources please?
    2
  156. Last time I dreamed I was on a plane I f*cked the stewardess: much more fun.
    2
  157. Please share then.
    2
  158. He listened to experts.
    2
  159. I fully agree! Let's stop this criminal who's making vaccines in his garden shed laboratory! Oh.... hang on a minute... someone just told me that in fact he funds the people who make the vaccines........ he doesn't even do it himself!! That's at least proof that he's lazy! PS: Bill Gates is indeed a fake name; it's actually William.
    2
  160.  @35millimetre  Do you really imagine for one second that I haven't?
    2
  161.  @reviewreviewer1  It certainly was not ok! I don't know what he said about Oscar Wilde; I haven't seen that speech, so I can't comment on that, but I remember the Catholic church one. I very much agree with him on that.
    2
  162.  @aeneasshinas2759  So, does your computer run on Linux?
    2
  163.  @thequietkiwi  "@Uncanny Valley Nothing you just said made sense." Oh yes it does.
    2
  164.  @MasMaszu2  I've tried staying up partying all night many times.... made me poorer if anything!
    2
  165.  @MasMaszu2  Eh? What did you say? Speak up!
    2
  166.  @GreenKiweez  At least you get to have breakfast twice!
    2
  167. Well not very far if you can't use any of those!
    2
  168.  @holysex1052  It doesn't matter, I'm leaving anyway. 4 days to get a bit of bloody service, just to find out that there's no bloody salad, whether it be side or not, and not even a glass of water for God's sake whilst waiting... I can tell you, I'm going to be writing a comment about all this on youtube, see if I don't!
    2
  169.  @geraldgerow6271  got a link to that please?
    2
  170.  @ebutuoy0312  I must admit, I typed that into youtube, saw a video captioned "heavy drinking, sexual harrassement, drugs and on-set catastrophes" and thought okay, so that's film making, now tell me something I didn't know! I see your point though; just found it funny to imagine a film set without all that! ;)
    2
  171.  @Samo7900  Very true! But I sort of see that system as being the epitome of corruption in itself...
    2
  172.  @frizzlethecat2084  Yep! I second that! (Englishman in France)
    2
  173. On peut avoir un lien stp?
    2
  174. What makes you say he hasn't? Someone( anonymous) said that a doctor (anonymous) said they met his doctor (anonymous) at a convention (anonymous, dateless, placeless) who said that they knew they weren't vaccinated. Therefore, two untrustworthy doctors who break oath by revealing details of a patient's medical record. Is that your source, or do you have anything better than that?
    2
  175. Do you give prizes to the best ones?
    2
  176.  @xmediabox  That's no good to us....we want prizes.
    2
  177. Boycottons ces débats ridicules!
    2
  178.  @ffxivonline5864  Donc il a déjà fait la prison: il a payé sa dette. Maintenant explique nous pourquoi c'est ok de tabasser quelqu'un, mentir, et risquer les vies des innocents avec une bombe lacrymogène à intérieure d'un bâtiment? Effectivement, tout criminel doit payer pour ses actions.... comme ces flics, par exemple. Lui, il a fait de la prison il y a 15 ans....la justice a considéré qu'il pouvait être libéré...alors sa place n'est pas en prison.
    2
  179.  @alexiszorbec-legras8232  Alors? Il a été condamné dans le passé, a servi sa peine... alors qu'est qui justifie les actions des flics? Parler mal (et encore, vu que ces flics mentent comme ils respirent il n'y a aucune raison de les croire) justifie une tabassage? Ils ont eu de la chance que la bombe lacrymogène n'a pas cramé le bâtiment avec tout le monde dedans...
    2
  180. " c'etait ": les faits remontent à il y a dix ans au moins, et il a purgé sa peine.
    2
  181. @Tan Jenner It IS true: I've seen many stories of, for instance, home-owners shooting burglars and having no consequences. People shooting muggers, random brawls (shooting someone is self-defense in a fist fight, really???). If you place defense of property as justification for killing somebody, that makes material more important than life.
    2
  182. Je serai curieux de voir si vraiment il y a un corrélation entre viol et tenue vestimentaire; j'imagine que le violeur typique (si ça existe) va plutôt choisir sa victime en fonctionne de l'opportunité qui se présente- femme seule/rue sombre etc. Je ne sais pas s'il existe des statistiques sur ça?
    2
  183.  @alexanderschmoldt2982  I think he's been having a discussion with an imaginary interlocutor... Reading your thread, there's not much of a link between what you say and what he says at all!
    2
  184.  @veritty6828  It does seem to be deeply rooted in our culture. Women sexualise themselves permanently; just look at most social media profile photos... It goes right through society on every level. Clothes are made figure-hugging, revealing cleavage or thigh or belly... Hang on.... stop! There's a problem there. Don't men sexualise themselves too? Look at their profile photos too. Men don't show cleavage.... but a good firm bicep or two... In movies, male heroes are usually the stereotype female fantasy of a strong man who takes no sh*t from the enemies, but is gentle with the ladies (except when she wants her hair pulled and her ass smacked)! The typical male hero quickly gets his shirt ripped, to show off his muscles, in the same way as the female heroine gets her skirt ripped off and finishes the film in her underwear. Our two bunny rabbit examples are a little different though. Bugs doesn't seem sexualised at all. Clothes do a lot of the sexualising, as well as the body form. Why are breasts so sexualised? What makes a woman's nipple unfit for youtube (although a machete attack or fatal crash is ok), but a man's is no problem? We're allowed to see the whole of the woman's breast, but not the nipple! Completely ridiculous, isn't it? Personally I think naturism is good: getting rid of clothes desexualises our bodies and makes us more equal. It forces you to accept your own body as well. Can't hide behind baggy clothes. Of course you can't be naked all the time, but it's a good experience.
    2
  185.  Maria Salinas  Unfortunately your last two replies have been deleted it would seem, so I've only seen the first bit of them, but you seem to have misread what I said: male heros in films are represented as the combination of superman who can beat all the enemies but is a perfect gentleman at the same time. You still maintain that showing cleavage is in no way sexual, which I disagree with. By the same logic, buttocks are in the same category. A plunging line like a cleavage on the buttocks would be seen how? My point is, functional clothing is not designed to reveal bits particularly, it's just there to be practical and comfortable. As soon as you start revealing more than "necessary", it changes the function of the clothing. For example, if a man is wearing a tee shirt, nothing is being "presented". Put him in a vest, and you're exposing much more of the upper arm and shoulder. He'd be seen in a different light in a meeting if he came in with bulging muscles on display. See the similarity now? What purpose does it have, for you, to wear clothes that show cleavage? I'd say it's a way of saying "hey everybody, look at this". Maybe for you, breasts have no sexual importance.... but for at least half the population they do. Even then, whether something is "sexual" or not is pretty irrelevant; it's visible, so it's something people see and therefore look at. If someone ha s beautiful hair I might well look at it during a conversation, because it's there in front of me and "nice" to look at. We are also inevitably attracted to big flashing neon signs.... but that doesn't mean they're sexual. You can go on deluding yourself that showing cleavage is uniquely for yourself (pure narcissism, then) or you can admit it's to have an effect on other people, even if it's just "oh, she looks nice". You'll notice that generally speaking, mens' clothing doesn't have holes cut out or slits or whatever to show particular parts of the body.That should tell you something.
    2
  186.  @RichieNicksGaming  I can relate to that!
    2
  187. So what you're saying is... She shouldn't have to call the police if the police were all women and sarcasm was considered a masculine trait, but without making any broad generalisations?
    2
  188. Ask the women if it's all about the money.
    2
  189.  @hkgr36.  Grandes boites alors!
    2
  190. Try the following : Night- sleep. Day- learning Next night- sleep. Does that help?!
    2
  191. He didn't. He surrounded himself with experts. That's way better than school.
    2
  192. What a surprise: username "God's favourite" (which in itself is complete megalomania) Note everyone, that often those who follow conspiracy theories also believe in God... could there be a connection?!
    2
  193.  @JackMagedi  Je n'ai pas vu le documentaire, et je n'ai pas lu les commentaires, mais je ne suis pas d'accord...et je ne sais pas pourquoi.
    2
  194.  @Toshiro_Mifune  Thought that one had got lost in the ocean... was proud of it too... glad to know someone appreciated it! ;) (not Bananarama I mean)
    2
  195. No it isn't. It's here. By the way it's censoring, with a c.
    2
  196. En cherchant. Il m'a fallu du temps mais....... me voila.
    2
  197. listen again.
    2
  198.  V I R T E X  l'air est un gaz aussi.
    2
  199.  @akloppthebest3175  Pas moi. C'est con, hein?!
    2
  200.  @akloppthebest3175  Allez: on dit 78.5 et on se serre la main? C'est quand même 78, mais bon... on s'en fout!
    2
  201.  @akloppthebest3175  Non. T'as vu 78 mais tu ne veux pas l'admettre.
    2
  202.  @akloppthebest3175  Si tu lis aussi bien que tu écris, c'est pas étonnant que tu vois 79 au lieu de 78! Cassé.... C'est 78.
    2
  203.  @akloppthebest3175  Non; rien compris là non plus. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohDB5gbtaEQ
    2
  204.  @akloppthebest3175  78
    2
  205. This is a university. The people there are students. One of the things they learn is how to conduct a civilised debate. Such debate is what all civilisation is (or should be ) based on. You've got to teach youngsters how to debate, how to express their opinions, how to listen and analyse those of others. So the outcome of this debate may have no significance in itself, but it's an exercise of great value. In debates such as this, both sides will give their presentation speech, and then pick apart the points of the opposition. This is just part of the opening speeches in the debate. Resource consuming? Why so, more than you or I? Privileged? You know, people can get to Oxford or Cambridge with scholarships, there are all sorts of aid possible.... many people get to these universities on merit alone. You shouldn't go making sweeping generalisations about what you think they must be.
    2
  206.  @kkr1492  Voila pourquoi ils choissent leurs patrons.
    2
  207. My predicted conversation with any conspiracy theorist: Here's what will happen, if we debate a bit: You'll say "Bill Gates wants to kill half the population, he was chucked out of India, Melinda is a man." I'll ask you for your sources, you'll either say "google it" or "do your own research" or "I don't give links anymore," or « follow the money », or "watch the Corbett report" or you'll just carry on spouting random rubbish. Then I'll give you my sources, which clearly show you're wrong, but you'll refuse to read (yes READ, not watch, sorry!), saying it's all just biased reports paid by "Big Pharma". Conveniently for you, everything which doesn't go in your sense is sponsored by Bill Gates, including me and anyone else who disagrees with you. Since "almost all media" is apparently funded by Gates (funny how it includes media from every single country in the world), except what's on youtube (which is ironic because it's mainly thanks to him that we're on youtube in the first place), it's impossible to provide you with any evidence. Yet you will ask repeatedly, saying mine isn't good enough without giving any yourself. You will spout on about how evil he is, with lots of CAPITAL LETTERS (you're probably catholic, so I can understand that anyone who promotes contraception is evil to you, since you haven't evolved from the Dark Ages), and completely ignore anything I say. When I ask if at the very least you use Linux and not Windows, you won't reply. Am I wrong?
    2
  208.  @johnrayordas  let him do it: as they say, "once bitten twice shy".... Weshould just wish him luck with those devil-spawn ducks....but since the comment was a month ago, I think he's touched those ducks by now... and we'll never hear from him again. R.I.P. (rest in the pond)
    2
  209. Wow.... so that's what a feminazi is! She completely ignores that male prostitution exists (so that's the gender equality argument out the window), that legalisation is not the same as decriminalisation (best to legalise for better control and security), that some do it by choice.... All that to support the Icelandic model of repression, restriction and censorship. Bravo. Keep it all underground, 100% black market, untraceable, mafia controlled: that's always worked in the past, hasn't it?
    2
  210.  @parabpbpbp  No, he asked for links to facts.
    2
  211.  @parabpbpbp My point is, there's a difference between a credible source and an article or documentary. Now if you want to call anything that calls out the bulls**t "mainstream", that's fine. Don't go pretending though that youtube videos are not mainstream. We've been talking from the start about evidence and sources, remember?
    2
  212.  @parabpbpbp  So, do you have any evidence of this "global cult"? Not just articles that cite other articles, or documentaries that cite nothing? Do you have anything that actually comes close to proving that, or are you asking me to just have faith in an idea?
    2
  213.  @parabpbpbp  Can't argue with that:all you want is to believe youtube videos. All the rest is fake.... so we'll end it there.
    2
  214. Time.
    2
  215.  @giselle_kvm  ...but especially help!
    2
  216.  @kdckrusia1744  I love how you go from lucifer to democrat! That's hard proof of evil-doing if ever there was any!
    2
  217. "This depopulator" has seen the population rise by a billion since 2010 when he talked about alternative energy for the expanding population. Sounds inefficient to me...
    2
  218.  @billDgundam817DFW  If men stopped rapping we'd have to put up with more Nikki Minaj? No thanks!
    2
  219. Can you tell me what a "digital vaccine" is supposed to be?
    2
  220.  @jean-pierrebernard3682  Oui le sujet de base est intéressant, mais mon point est que ça n'a rien à voir avec son post-feminisme toxique à elle....c'est quelque chose auquel n'importe qui peut être confronté, homme ou femme.
    2
  221. "je crois que j'ai jamais vu une femme aussi dedaigneuse qu'elle, aussi autaine et faire preuve d'autant de mauvaise fois" Ah bon? Tu connais pas Fiona Schmidt alors!! Bon visionnage! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lm99UhKPgvE
    2
  222. Gordon says "fuck you!"
    2
  223. Predicted the future without even knowing he did? Erm..... does the weatherman make up the forecast off the top of his head, or is there a team of meteorologists collecting and examining years of data and extrapolating from it to create previsions?
    2
  224. Of course they are, by using TV, movies and games as a substitute parent. That's where they spend most time, infront of a screen, so that's where their education comes from.
    2
  225. @haze Well, I don't really understand what your point is.... I think women can be easily just as twisted as men, and are often the power behind the throne. As for winning wars, off the top of my head there's Margaret Thatcher: okay; it was a silly little war over a strategic sheep farm, but no doubt about the outcome.
    2
  226.  @Machine9000  You sound like a nice person! Don't worry, people will help you if ever you're in need.
    2
  227.  @jimmyswaggart1189  Drum roll....... arms getting tired..... trailing off.... stops.... No evidence forthcoming! Are we surprised?
    2
  228.  @SAN-yb6yz  In which interview does he talk about depopulation? I've seen none. Sources, please!
    2
  229.  @SAN-yb6yz  I think many people would be curious to know where all this "proof" comes from. Sources please!
    2
  230.  @MarvFitBikesKicks  He explains it here (just a 2min vidéo): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozlbeXrb_5A
    2
  231. @Ire4 Not a question of faith. I'm just talking about what he says, versus what people say he says. See the difference?
    2
  232.  @yellow3lantern  I agree that the destruction of the environment and industry are the major problem with regards to CO2 emission. The problem is, it's harder to stop people doing things than it is to help people do things. Part of the problem is us, the consumers, and judging by the way we're all glued to our screens most of the time, we're not willing to give up our luxuries. Those who are willing don't comment on youtube because they've had the strength of conviction to leave all that technology behind. So if the consumer wants more (and developing countries being huge potential consumers who want more and more, to be on our level), you have to find other ways of dealing with the problem. One of these is alternative energy sources, which of course Bill Gates talks about in this very video. When people are dying like flies, should you try to help with healthcare, or say "hold on, we'll just sort out all the world's problems first- we'll get to you later"? Remember, curable disease kills more people than malnutrition or famine: https://ourworldindata.org/causes-of-death
    2
  233.  @SAN-yb6yz  You've got to look further than just documentaries and interviews if you want to find the truth.All such videos have some bias one way or the other. What's important is finding sources. When someone says "the Italian parliament calls for his arrest", it sounds impressive. Then it turns out the source is just one politician, who makes the same errors as so many out there. Is that the parliament? No, it's not. Fact checked, without passing by CNN. Was he "banned" from India? As you can see from my post above (with link to Indian government site), no he wasn't. Fact checked, with statement directly from the Indian government, not CNN. Fact checking is not about watching a documentary. Watch them, sure, but look for the sources they themselves use. If it's a serious video, there will be links. Did he vaccinate his kids? I don't know: he says yes, some say no. But do those saying no have any proof? No, they don't. It all comes from a supposed ex family doctor, reported by another anonymous doctor at an anonymous event. Just hearsay. I notice how you use the language of conspirators: "down the rabbit hole", "wake up".... want to add "sheeple", to complete the panoply? Governments do indeed lie to us constantly, but don't go making that classic mistake of thinking that if something goes against the government discourse it must be true.
    2
  234.  @gooty64  You didn't spoon feed him any information: you blurted out a random accusation, that's all. If you'd given some links to justify your statement, that could be considered either spoon feeding or politely and intelligently sharing information in an adult discussion.
    2
  235.  @joshuawilliams7653  You won't succeed in making me go mad, you know! However, you remind me of this: Monty Python – Argument https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohDB5gbtaEQ
    2
  236.  @DanaConrad7  What do you mean, you're not sure of my point? My point is it's a crazy conspiracy theory, and a pathetic one at that, to say he wants to reduce the population. Is that clearer?
    2
  237.  @joshuawilliams7653  Fair enough! :) One little thing though.... what makes the microchip the mark of the beast? Why wasn't it paper money, for example?
    2
  238.  @joshuawilliams7653  I agree: the Bible is thousands of years old, even. There have been a number of predicted ends of the world already, none of which actually happened. When you see how people manage to completely distort the words of Bill Gates, to take an example at random (!) without even translating from one language to another, I'm always amazed to see how people can take the words of the Bible as being gospel truth (pun intended). Multiple authors, multiple translations.... doesn't make it a book I'd follow to the letter, if I were you! If implants were to become common (let's be honest; they do exist), they're more likely to be in the upper arm, not the hand or in the middle of the face. So that's already one detail that doesn't ring true. Only a detail, you might say, but since you're talking about precise details... Pretty much anything in the Bible can be read how you want to hear it. An example I like to use for that point is this one: "ye judges of the Earth judge with fear" (sorry, don't know exactly where that is in the Bible I just remember it from school days, but even if it's a false quote, the point will remain the same). What does that mean to you? Does it mean that Earthly judges (legal system) should use fear as a tool .... or does it mean that they should be afraid to judge because only God can do that?
    2
  239.  @spacemonkey1776  "adverse reactions" to vaccines does not equal death. You can't just take into account side effects, but also how many would have died if not vaccinated. Why the long list on the inserts? Like absolutely any medication, they try to cover as many possibilities as they can. Like food; "may contain traces of peanut", even in things that have never been anywhere near a peanut. Why the immunity from the government? Because when you produce something that will be used by vast numbers of people, there will be some cases of liability established. Of course there will: no vaccine, or any other medication, is 100% safe. Nothing in the World is.So if you vaccinate billions of people, lots will complain. Too many to make it worthwhile making the vaccines. It may only be a tiny proportion of the users, but when it's a tiny proportion of billions, that's still a lot of people. So no, ten years later "he" hasn't done a very good job of reducing the population if that was the goal.
    2
  240.  @spacemonkey1776  I looked up the "judge with fear" quote, which is as you say not exactly what's written. It's this, depending the version: "…9You will break them with an iron scepter; You will shatter them like pottery.” 10Therefore be wise, O kings; be admonished, O judges of the earth. 11Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling.…" (at least, that's the one which most closely resembles my vague memory of the phrase. Very easy to look up by the way with google rather than searching the Bible directly!) https://biblehub.com/psalms/2-10.htm So I agree with your interpretation, but when you see all the different translations, there's room for some variety in the understanding of what is meant.
    2
  241.  @spacemonkey1776  I appreciate your detailed replies, but this all has nothing really to do with the Bible anyway. I just took a quote to show how interpretation has an effect. It's really all about bringing some evidence to the discussion if you have a point to make. Too many people criticise Gates for things that simply aren't true (him being kicked out of India, for example), thus drowning in a sea of b*llsh*t the things that may actually be true. A shame, because there may well be some dodgy goings-on, but if we're given unfounded arguments (such as the "he wants to kill half the population" one suggested in this thread), we're not going to take the rest seriously.
    2
  242.  @miaash3870  "This monster together with the beastly wife ought to be investigated, cross-examined, prosecuted and accordingly sentenced for their untold crimes against humanity." Well that reminds me a bit of the witch trials... No point in investigating if you've already decided the outcome!
    2
  243.  @spacemonkey1776  "birth rates lowered in healther countries because they were being make less fertile or not fertal at all because they are taking over 72 shot with in the first two years of birth then continues throughout thier life" - what absolute rubbish. First, with your 72 shots you're talking about America, not the rest of the world. Second: the population in western countries has been lowering for a while, not just since the latest vaccine schedules. Face reality: improve living conditions, improve health, mechanise farming, allow access to contraception and people have less kids.
    2
  244.  @spacemonkey1776  Where indeed is the line? I don't know, so I refuse to decide for them. Society as a whole decides things together (in an ideal situation, which of course exists in no country on Earth!), after debating among experts. These ethical/moral decisions are always flexible and change with time. The difference between kicking a woman, thus killing her baby, and her deciding? Precisely that: her deciding. Big difference. But I'll never convince you otherwise and nor will you, it's too deeply ingrained in me: it's not up to me to decide what a woman does with her body or the life that she can choose to give or not. We have the right to tell someone not to steal or murder because we've decided we have the right. Do we have the right to kill someone who disagrees? If you vote for a government that supports the death penalty, are you not guilty of murder? Millions of kids were sent off to fight the first and second world wars; nobody asked them if they wanted to. They went to prison if they refused, or forced labour. Again, where does your 60 million abortions figure come from? As for the elderly people comparison, I don't think it's equivalent at all. To answer anyway, no, I don't think it'd be right..... but future generations might decide otherwise! However, I think they should have the right to turn off your life support if you wish them to. I'm pro-euthanasia in certain circumstances.
    2
  245.  @spacemonkey1776  "The difference between abortions and people being put to death in the death penalty is that someone had to do something to deserve to be put to death" Sounds like you're judging what's deserving..... careful now, ye judge of the Earth!! Didn't God (allegedly) say "thou shalt not kill"? Was there an asterisk after, with a list of exceptions at the bottom of the tablet?
    2
  246.  @barbied3034  Yeah, there'll always be some who give sob-stories and some who seem cold hearted, but at the end of the day, it's not me, a man, who'd have to carry a baby to term, maybe risking my life or health for something I don't want. There are more reasons for abortion than just the rape argument, so once again, I refuse to decide for a woman whether pregnancy should be imposed on her or not.
    2
  247.  @Manche-De-Pelle  Erm... fine, except that he doesn't suggest reducing population at all.Also, he's pumping a fair bit of money into energy research, because governments aren't doing enough.
    2
  248.  @Manche-De-Pelle  I agree that he's probably not 100% altruistic! The only thing is to work out what's true or not. There's a whole lot of blatant lies out there as well, so it's not easy. To respond to one thing however, he does apparently invest in other things than vaccines, if you check out the foundation's website. Stuff like toilets, renewable energy etc.
    2
  249.  @andreocity8031  Yeah, I know; I just can't help it! But occasionally I have come across some interesting links through discussions with such people. Funny how most of them block completely on stupid things about Bill Gates (such as the population reduction thing), and seem to completely miss the real reasons to worry about him, such as conflict of interest, too much power due to his massive investments etc. I don't expect to change anyone's mind really, but it's always fun to see just how bad it can get! For people who like to "go down the rabbithole", most of them don't seem to get past the entrance. They'll never get to see the rabbit, in any case!
    2
  250.  @thatlady4189  Teenager: between thirteen and nineteen.
    2
  251. My predicted conversation with any conspiracy theorist: Here's what will happen, if we debate a bit: You'll say "Bill Gates wants to kill half the population, he was chucked out of India, Melinda is a man." I'll ask you for your sources, you'll either say "google it" or "do your own research" or "I don't give links anymore," or « follow the money », or "watch the Corbett report" or you'll just carry on spouting random rubbish. Then I'll give you my sources, which clearly show you're wrong, but you'll refuse to read (yes READ, not watch, sorry!), saying it's all just biased reports paid by "Big Pharma". Conveniently for you, everything which doesn't go in your sense is sponsored by Bill Gates, including me and anyone else who disagrees with you. Since "almost all media" is apparently funded by Gates (funny how it includes media from every single country in the world), except what's on youtube (which is ironic because it's mainly thanks to him that we're on youtube in the first place), it's impossible to provide you with any evidence. Yet you will ask repeatedly, saying mine isn't good enough without giving any yourself. You will spout on about how evil he is, with lots of CAPITAL LETTERS (you're probably catholic, so I can understand that anyone who promotes contraception is evil to you, since you haven't evolved from the Dark Ages), and completely ignore anything I say. When I ask if at the very least you use Linux and not Windows, you won't reply. Am I wrong?
    2
  252.  @bleuettelaure5017  Alors qu'est ce qui se passe si MOI je ne veux pas savoir quel genre de musique écoutent les gens en les regardant, quel genre de sport ils aiment pratiquer etc etc? On pourrait tous porter des bleus de travail identique? Ça me rappelle quelque-chose, ça!
    2
  253.  @dogwalker666  It means "I don't know really so I'll just ignore you"
    2
  254.  @cielocaribe  Something tells me no link will be forthcoming....funny, isn't it?
    2
  255.  @tehillah1000  So much wrong in your post. First, he does not mention lowering population. I'll get back to that. Second it's carbon dioxide, not monoxide. Third he doesn't skip onto the next topic; he develops the main topic. Fourth, everyone obviously does understand him in the audience. Now, what does he actually say: "Now the world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 %, but there we see an increase of about 1.3." The 10-15% refers to the increase rate of 1.3 that could be brought down. That therefore implies slowing a growth rate, and thus no murdering at all. Context. You have to finish the end of the sentence to understand it. The population will continue to increase up to its point of stability, but slower than if there are no improvements to living conditions and education. Next, the equation: CO2 = P x S x E x C P= people S= services per person E= energy per service C = carbon dioxide per unit energy The last one, C, must come down to zero because all the others will increase, even if you slow down the rate of increase. "Innovating to zero" = creating alternative energy sources that do not produce CO2. Simple maths: anything x anything x anything x zero = zero. This is why the title of the talk is about innovating to zero emissions; you can stop the excess CO2 production from industry by changing the energy source for the industry. So, no skipping subjects, just getting to the point.
    2
  256.  @fatcat5817  Yeah, you're right; only the elite benefit from human evolution. You know what? We (Europe, America etc) are the elite. At least have the decency to appreciate that you've got drinkable water pouring out of a tap in your own home. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=me4BZBsHwZs
    2
  257.  @zohraada4388  Il n'y a pas question de contrôler ses pulsions, mais de ne pas être obligé de se contrôler... Si on a des codes vestimentaires selon les lieux (boite, plage, salle de réunion, classe) c'est en partie pour ne pas créer des distractions, pour répondre aux normes sociétale de décence, et praticité (notamment dans le sport, par exemple). Si vous n’êtes pas foutu de vous habiller correctement, pourquoi on doit prendre sur nous? Prenez sur vous, dans ce cas là, et habillez vous. Si les garçons venaient en cours en cycliste avec des trous pour montrer les couilles, vous crierez à l'exhibitionnisme! Si on doit "maîtriser nos pulsions", à vous aussi de vous maîtriser et arrêtez de vous croire sur la plage. Le jour ou on sera tous égale et on peut se promener partout entièrement nu, il y aura pas de souci. En attendant, on a des codes vestimentaires selon les lieux, qui doivent être respectés par les femmes autant qu'ils le sont par les hommes. Vous voulez changer ces codes? Pas de problème, mais alors c'est pareil pour garçon et fille.... et ça s’arrête à la nudité, le plus grand égalisateur, parce que sinon, ou est la limite exactement?
    2
  258. So what's the right age to learn?
    2
  259.  @jairkerker2821  Ok ok.... you've got me! I'll reserve another two hours.
    2
  260. Ain't no one lowering population round here. You're on the wrong topic.
    2
  261. Ou les jeunes qui n'ont pas reçu leurs colis...
    2
  262.  @TheBuzz222  No, you said this: "Ted talks: We can reduce the world population by 15% with vaccines."" Now if you can't see the difference, I can't help you any more.
    2
  263.  @TheBuzz222  So, your channel has no content........ so what?
    2
  264. You should stop tripping on youtube videos and go trip outside in the nature: you'll get much more out of your psychedelic experience.
    2
  265.  @ethicalbunny  Interesting points, and as someone who's studied environmental science myself I know there's still some debate on climate change. However, even if such is the case, would you deny that the use of fossil fuels is a pretty damaging process? Nuclear energy, as it exists today, is "clean".... but only up until you have to dispose of the waste or deal with accidents. Since this is an ongoing problem, we need other sources of energy if we want everyone to be able to enjoy the comfort we have in developed countries. Whether you believe global warming is a problem is irrelevant in a way. Pollution is a problem, if not for the climate, for us. Just go to any country where pollution is less controlled and you'll see just how bad the air is and how many boxes of paracetamol you go through when in towns!
    2
  266.  @ubermalice9589  That actually sounds quite tasty!
    2
  267. But as usual, the bearer of bad tidings takes the most flak!
    2
  268. The thing is, you can let them believe what they want.... but they'll educate their kids that way too.
    2
  269. Voila pourquoi le gouvernement a merdé complètement depuis le début. Le publique n'a pas confiance, et avec raison; que des infos conflictuelles, que des mesures sans sens.... et à aucun moment ils ont accepté de mettre de l'argent dans les services de santé pour qu'ils soient capable d'absorber les malades. N'oublions pas, quand ils nous parlent de "31% des lits prisent pour les malades du COVID, ça représente en réalité 4 ou 5 lits dans un hôpital qui dispose de 15! Mais une pourcentage ça sonne mieux, plus effrayant... Si le gouvernement (et c'est le même problème dans d'autres pays aussi) ne mentait pas toute l'année sur tout sujet confondu, on aurait peut être confiance. Que les gens à risque se confinent, et que les autres continuent à faire fonctionner le pays, sachant qu'ils ont plus de risque de mourir d'un cancer un jour que le COVID.
    2
  270. He did show them that he didn't have a gun. Got shot (maybe not an expert to know it was a beanbag?), fled for his life.
    2
  271.  @konradzareba9935  Now that would be very silly indeed.
    2
  272.  @yusefasabiyah495  By the way, do you use Linux?
    2
  273. Or maybe it just makes good plain sense if you don't join up completely unrelated dots in a nonsensical fashion?
    2
  274.  @insanegenius5321  Funnily enough I was about to reply the same: my bad! Reading further, they said (9 Nov) that the data should be ready in the third week of november... so you're nearly right, within a week!
    2
  275. Sad isn't it? You see how easy it was to check up.... and yet so many people won't bother. They just regurgitate what their favourite influencer says...
    2
  276.  @valeriehullett6065  It's really not complicated. The title is "innovating to zero". He's talking about the emissions of CO2 from human activity. He explains it in the talk.... and it should be pretty obvious to anybody who takes the time to think a few seconds.Of course he's not talking about ALL of it; that would be stupid and completely impossible anyway. He wants to bring down to zero the excess CO2 generated by industry. Of course he doesn't want to eliminate all plant life and all human life. That' would be silly. He doesn't bother to explain that because it's so bloody obvious. So before you worry about whether you trust him or not, at least understand the concepts he's talking about. Innovating to zero = creating new sources of energy that don't involve combustion which creates CO2.
    2
  277. Yes, he meant what he said! The problem is that so many people out there don't understand what he said....
    2
  278.  @Curyrus  Also he's a psychopath: see youtube video "how to recognise a psychopath".
    2
  279. Point taken.
    2
  280.  @chaybbx8767  "@IGNOSTIK passionnant, tu as clairement l'intention de me faire perdre mon temps on dirait" Laisse tomber; j'ai essayé aussi... pas moyen de discuter avec cette folle.
    2
  281.  @maschaorsomething  You're stuck in an abusive home, over 18? Leave!! You're not stuck, you just think you are. I know it may seem hard, but you're young, so many possibilities are open to you. I don't know which country you live in, but since you're European, and lockdown is pretty much finished (for the moment!), you can go live anywhere. There are squats if you have no money (look for artists squats, they're a healthier environment), you could maybe buy a van to live in (it's a great way of life and you can always find seasonal work. pretty much anything is better than an abusive home! Get the f**k out! The world is big, and much of it is friendly!
    2
  282.  @brits72  Rule no.1 of youtube comments: assume everyone is stupid unless shown otherwise! Seriously though, I'm just asking. Never used Sky myself so I don't know the difference between that and what I had (Europasat). Just thinking of possibles.... remember correlation does not equal causation.
    2
  283.  @cardinal3728  I've been trying to have intelligent conversations for a while on this subject, but was confronted constantly by the same ignorance. Up to the point where I wrote this: "My predicted conversation with any conspiracy theorist: Here's what will happen, if we debate a bit: You'll say "Bill Gates wants to kill half the population, he was chucked out of India, Melinda is a man." I'll ask you for your sources, you'll either say "google it" or "do your own research" or "I don't give links anymore," or « follow the money », or "watch the Corbett report" or you'll just carry on spouting random rubbish. Then I'll give you my sources, which clearly show you're wrong, but you'll refuse to read (yes READ, not watch, sorry!), saying it's all just biased reports paid by "Big Pharma". Conveniently for you, everything which doesn't go in your sense is sponsored by Bill Gates, including me and anyone else who disagrees with you. Since "almost all media" is apparently funded by Gates (funny how it includes media from every single country in the world), except what's on youtube (which is ironic because it's mainly thanks to him that we're on youtube in the first place), it's impossible to provide you with any evidence. Yet you will ask repeatedly, saying mine isn't good enough without giving any yourself. You will spout on about how evil he is, with lots of CAPITAL LETTERS (you're probably catholic, so I can understand that anyone who promotes contraception is evil to you, since you haven't evolved from the Dark Ages), and completely ignore anything I say. When I ask if at the very least you use Linux and not Windows, you won't reply. Am I wrong?" Up to now, not one single person has replied intelligently to that. Very few have replied at all. it tends to stop them in their tracks! Those that have replied have just dug their hole deeper. If it's any consolation, it's probably only a small number of people who leave comments here, so does not represent the population as a whole. At least, I hope so! Otherwise, we're all f**ked!
    2
  284.  @spicygamma3834  Well that was a useful contribution. Glad you dropped in!
    2
  285. 1) He's not trying to depopulate the world. Watch the video you cited. 2)If they're "secret eugenicists", how do you know about it? Not a very well kept secret... 3)Vaccines are not laced with "birth contraception" (otherwise known as "contraception") 4)Got a problem with contraception? Think women should be forced reproductive factories? 5) What have diagnoses got to do with Bill Gates?
    2
  286. Yeah but apart from all that, it's a pretty solid theory!
    2
  287.  @moniquepeyron4573  Contrairement à toi, beaucoup de gens savent que tous qui se trouve au supermarché s'achète à la base ailleurs aussi... enfin, c'était le cas avant....
    2
  288.  @moniquepeyron4573  D'abord, ici on est dans les commentaires youtube: je ne sais pas si t'as remarqué, mais personne ici ne se présente en disant "bonjour je m'appelle Joe est ce que je peux participer avec une commentaire à moi s'il vous plaît?" Ensuite, mon commentaire n'était pas hors propos; tu semblait dire que il n'y a que les supermarchés pour manger... et que "remplir le frigo" (surtout en hiver!) est une nécessité. Si tu ne vois pas l'inutilité d'obliger tout le monde d'aller dans le même magasin, en fermant les autres, je ne peux pas t'aider. Si tu ne vois pas qu'aller voir un spectacle ou film t'exposes à moins de risque que de prendre le métro, je ne peux pas t'aider. Si tu ne vois pas l'importance psychologique du divertissement, je ne peux pas t'aider.
    2
  289.  @moniquepeyron4573  Cool, ça veux dire que c'est moi qui clôture le discussion! Relis tes mots; tu suggères qu'il n'y a que besoin des supermarchés. Tu t'es pas présenté non plus, t'es entrée sur la commentaire de quelqu'un d'autre; très impolie de ta part.... sauf que non, parce que les règles de politesse dépendent du lieu/situation/personnes/époque/tout le reste: dire que quelqu'un est impoli basé sur des notions de politesse que personne d'autre adopte, est pour le moins....impolie, pour ne pas dire autre choses beaucoup moins.....poli. Passe une très belle soirée, la méchante! :)
    2
  290.  @moniquepeyron4573  Ma très chère.... tu n'auras pas supprimé tous tes commentaires parce que t'avais tort et maintenant tu ne veux pas que ça se vois?!
    2
  291. Oh it's easy really: if they manage to kill him, he can't get sick, can he?!
    2
  292.  @bbrayshay  Don't worry; the only ones saying that are paranoid Catholics. I'll admit though that their outrageous lies do seem to be taking hold in the general public, probably due to them saturating social media with their rubbish. You can always tell though, that it's them; from their idiotic outcries with regards to contraception, or their highly original responses to logic: "wake up sheeple, do your own research, follow the money, watch the Corbett Report"..etc They choose to ignore that making money out of vaccines and eradicating most of the population just don't go together. They're also obsessed with a "depopulation agenda" which, despite this video being ten years old, and the population one billion bigger, doesn't seem to deter them! You can see further down in the comments my "predicted conversation with any conspiracy theorist". For the moment, nobody has replied with anything other than what I predicted they would!
    2
  293. If medical treatment is not a human right, what is?
    2
  294.  @karidufano6614  Funny that. When I'm on a topic I tend to make a document with all my links on it, so I just have to copy and paste into conversations. Gains a lot of time and means I can share easily without feeling like I'm repeating myself too much.
    2
  295. Yeah, he's talking about the increase: his phrase is "Now the world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 %, but there we see an increase of about 1.3." 6.8x 1.3 =9(ish) The 10-15% refers to this increase. A lot of videos have taken that phrase, conveniently edited out the "but there we see an increase of about 1.3" and then say he wants to kill off 10 to 15% of the population. Of course, their reasoning goes out the window with the complete sentence, and also because the talk was ten years ago and the population is now 7.8 billion! The population reduction methods obviously need revising!
    2
  296.  @gunter6377  Yep, suspicious isn't it?!
    2
  297.  @meganisawesome9394  Try getting the maximum of your information from scientific sources: media articles are biased, politicians are biased, companies are biased... Science is not. Scientists may be.... but Science is there as a system to root them out. So if you need to see two sides of a story, see which one has the most to back it up, and who those source papers were written by (past history, qualifications, peer reviewed, retracted or not, declarations of conflict of interests etc). Sometimes, for example, you'll see an article by "Doctor Smith" on quantum physics in alternative medicine.... and then you'll see he's a "doctor" chiropractor... You'll only see his article in public media, not in a medical journal.
    2
  298.  @Juampi_Marino  Thanks; that's cleared up a mystery, that could've haunted the internet for months more...
    2
  299.  @gromitpesley  Look further up the thread and you'll see I already have explained it.
    2
  300.  @claytonbigsby2438  Of course 0 people = 0 carbon.... but since nobody is suggesting that, least of all Bill Gates in this talk, it is of no relevance, and a completely stupid idea.
    2
  301.  @claytonbigsby2438  Where is it implied? He says the population will increase.. He also says it's the last bit of the equation (C) that has to come down close to zero.
    2
  302.  @francekroondijk3159  That's got to be the best theory I've heard in a long while!
    2
  303.  @francekroondijk3159  Yeah, that's ok.... it was somewhat sarcastic though!
    2
  304.  @francekroondijk3159  Yeah I know; great ideas just come naturally to me.
    2
  305.  @claytonbigsby2438  " I think it's implied": how vague can you get?!
    2
  306.  @krissy1  This could go on a long time...
    2
  307.  @giggles332  Well that's convenient, isn't it?!
    2
  308.  @basedblackbeard4456  How so? Never heard of vaccines decreasing population.... sure you're not getting muddled up with slowing down the increase in population, which is completely different?
    2
  309.  @arieson7715  No. You have to listen at least to the end of the sentence at 4:53... and preferably stay patient just a little bit longer to get to the end of the equation. Go on; it'll only take you a minute or two and you'll understand so much more!
    2
  310. No, it's carbon...
    2
  311.  @stanbily9416  Don't you understand the concept? Better health + contraception = people choosing to have smaller families.
    2
  312.  @Hemaa7  Think of it this way: even if they haven't got our best interests at heart, they've certainly got theirs, so why pollute their own environment with something they can't protect themselves against?
    2
  313.  @Yabuturtle  The more I think of it, the funnier it is; I guess what takes the most time, while the population steadily increases, is planning how to leave subtle clues everywhere about what your fiendish plans are. You can't just go reducing the population without leaving symbolism everywhere! If people don't know you've got an evil plan, there's no point having one!
    2
  314. To quote another youtube commentator: "This guy has been fighting viruses since Windows 95" (jon kallas)
    2
  315. "ANYTHING THAT'S TRUE THEY FACT CHECK " Do you not understand what fact checking actually means?! Also no need for caps, we're not half blind here. It's just considered rude.
    2
  316.  @stevenhodgson834  "Cuz factcheckers are owned by Big Pharma, who also own all the sites that do stats, so no data is reliable.....except what I found on facebook cuz that's not MSM. Do YouR oWn ReSareCh!"
    2
  317. You didn't see any answers in the comments? You didn't look very far then. let me summarize for you: The equation lists several factors, CO2 = P x S x E x C P= people S= services per person E= energy per service C = carbon dioxide per unit energy The last one, C, must come down to zero because all the others will increase, even if you slow down the rate of increase. "Innovating to zero" = creating alternative energy sources that do not produce CO2. Simple maths: anything x anything x anything x zero = zero. Population is mentioned as a side note, and he clearly says that even if you slow the rate of increase (the famous 10-15%, which is rate of increase, NOT actual population), it won't change much in the way of CO2 output. You've made the same mistake as lots of people: you've put quote marks around phrases that YOU invented, not what he actually said. This is very misleading for others, and probably how you got misled yourself. Some people actively edit videos to cut out the bits where he explains himself. Many people obviously don't listen to the end of videos like this one which haven't been edited. If they did, they'd realise it all makes perfect sense and the depopulation stuff is just lies. Proof: exactly as his figures suggest, the population has INCREASED by a billion since this talk was given. Where's the depopulation there? So when you say "it's pretty absurd to think he's talking about anything other than lowering population " it just shows you didn't even listen to the end of the equation, let alone the whole talk! It also shows that your maths skills are sadly lacking. Now please, before replying, listen to the talk again, bearing in mind what I've told you. At least listen to the end of the equation; it's only about 5 minutes in.
    2
  318.  @britishone4759  Coincidence? No...he predicted it. Predictions (such as weather forecasts, rather than Nostradamus) are based on gathering data, analysing it and extrapolating from said data.
    2
  319.  @stevenhodgson834  cheers. Nice to know somebody understands...
    2
  320.  @tw3ntythr337  I don't think anybody believes it's a coincidence, do they? The question is more "can we forecast disease like the weather? The answer of course is "yes".
    2
  321.  @lavendertown1262  No really, listen to the end of the eaquation.
    2
  322.  @brky_glc4135  Good luck to you then! You seem to be doing fine for the moment...
    2
  323.  @SonGoku-xz4zv  je me mêle des affaires du pays dans lequel j'habite. C'est ça l’intégration.
    2
  324.  @SonGoku-xz4zv  je me mêle des affaires du pays dans lequel j'habite. C'est ça l’intégration.
    2
  325.  @banibatbout  Merci, je viens de le regarder... :) Effectivement un beau film, bien mieux fait que Imperium. Ça pourrait presque me remonter le morale!
    2
  326.  @banibatbout  Je ne vais pas prétendre que je n'ai pas versé une larme! Il y a un vieux film Anglais qui est bien, sur la culture skinhead de notre coté de l'Atlantique :"This Is England". Ils ont fait une séries aussi par la suite, couvrant les années 80, puis 90. Une autre coté du monde des skins... "Made In Britain" aussi; ou le fait qu'il soit skinhead est plutôt anecdotale... c'est surtout une histoire d'ado en colère.
    2
  327.  @banibatbout  Merci, ça sera pour ce weekend! :)
    2
  328.  @minnietoot9704  Yeah, but I think it's sexual misconduct, not harassment. Using the right terms is important. As for should be be sacked for it, I'd say no; if it's misconduct, because it's not something that's done regularly, so it's not harassment, which I'd consider more serious.. Question of victimhood as well; if any man complained of a woman doing the same thing he'd be laughed at. Why can't she just deal with it? He was clumsy, probably had no other environment than the work one to do it in (though there I'm just guessing), and didn't harm or touch her or whatever. It was just a question. I think nobody should be fired for that. He wasn't even her "superior"; just guest starring on the show, so no links to production to put pressure on her in any way...; so no abuse of power that I can see. Didn't he get famous later?
    2
  329. Because that's the way he is? Nervous laugh during interviews? Smiling as a reflex action in pretty much any situation? Lots of people do that... doesn't make them the Antichrist...
    2
  330. I'll say goodbye now, in case I get deleted....
    2
  331.  @despy1855  I shouldn't need to! But yeah, this is sarcasm. Read all the thread, it should be very obvious.
    2
  332.  @he-ch1559  Yeah... at the same time though, you can find "may contain traces of peanut" on food packaging that has absolutely nothing resembling nuts in it...
    2
  333.  @alexioforte397  You're getting some things completely mixed up. Digitized ID already exists; your passport is probably, if you've renewed it in the last 5 or 6 years (maybe more; I can't remember exactly when that was brought in). The thing about vaccines and ID is to give people ID papers (which are also digitized) in developing countries when they go to get their vaccines, thus cutting out unnecessary voyages and getting to more of the population. I'd say "killing two birds with one stone".... but I fear it would be misinterpreted! Obligatory vaccines for traveling existed a long way back. When I went to Colombia in 1990 I had to have proof of yellow fever ( I think it was that one) vaccination. This was on a paper, but now of course it would be on a card probably, like your credit card. The money-less society has been creeping up for a while too; nothing to do with the COVID thing: my daughter (24) never, ever has cash! There's a whole generation like that. Do I like it? No. It would stop me from doing undeclared work (which is why cash is disappearing!) and I wonder how the homeless will be able to survive (or hope to one day do more than just survive) with no cash donations... The rich of course don't need cash anyway. Their dodgy dealings are done with gold and shares etc etc. Microchips in vaccines don't exist. Quantum dots do, but that's just a tag.
    2
  334.  @alexioforte397  How do you know it's bullshit if you haven't read it?
    2
  335.  @The_Reality_Filter  Sorry, wires crossed: I was replying to the Jimmy Savile comment, not the Switzerland one. There's a difference between being concerned about potential danger and saying that the COVID19 was invented to cover up the 5G implantation, or that 5G is responsible for people dropping dead at Wuhan, or that viruses can be modified by 5G waves. Do you see the difference?
    2
  336.  @usaball9190  You know, I'm not religious... but you sound f**king evil when you say that! "Landlords have to evict many people who are in a tough spot way before the Covid hits to make sure that their investments’ gains stay as high as possible" Do you understand what you are saying? Having an investment return AS HIGH AS POSSIBLE means they "have to" evict? No they don't have to do anything. They could be less greedy and accept LOWER returns. It's all about greed. That's capitalism: "You expect a return on your investment and nothing else". Seriously, that's a thoroughly evil concept! "But are now “obligated” to forsake the earning of your investment just because the tenants have a sobbing story to tell ".... Yes, sorry: if it means generating human suffering (and being chucked out of your home is suffering), you can forsake a bit of earnings on your precious investments! Shareholders (those who don't put in five minutes of honest labour, but expect workers to die for them) are not everything. They certainly shouldn't be anyway. That's what's so f**ked up in this world.So rather than making excuses for those greedy c**ts, we need to seriously consider other models than capitalism.
    2
  337. C'est bien de dire "courage aux soignants" etc, mais si vraiment vous voulez les aider, pensez le prochain fois qu'il faut voter a voter pour un parti qui les donnera plus de moyens, pensez a descendre dans la rue avec eux quand ils manifestent plutôt de les regarder se faire gazer par les CRS, pensez a écrire à vos députés pour demander des comptes, pensez! J'espère qu'on n'aura pas nos forets décimés par des feux cet été parce que devinez quoi: il manque des pompiers aussi. C'est pas faute de le dire...
    2
  338.  @fpsFAMOUS  Why compare with China? They imposed a limit of one child per family, which is certainly not what Bill Gates is suggesting. He is not pushing a "eugenics agenda"... do you know what eugenics is? "Embedded in his family history" means nothing. My dad sold stationary to offices... I'm in theatre. Completely different.
    2
  339. Vrai. Ils seraient mieux dans un appartement en ville, sortis deux fois par jour pour pisser...
    2
  340. Does not the term "assault weapon" refer primarily to semi-automatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns that are able to accept detachable magazines, for example? That therefore does not exclude other guns, so you can still defend your house...
    2
  341.  @TheCourtsOfLove  A: I don't care at all, I'm just passing time in otherwise interesting conversations. B: It can be considered that the sentence begins with "@insertname", thus making a capital irrelevant. There is no rule of grammar for this. Also, you replied with exactly the same thing: "@xin wei Koh - cough at least I know English." Since when does a sentence start with a hyphen? For the full stop, I think we could agree that it's not much of a fault in itself now, is it? Probably about half the people in comments sections don't end their comments with a full stop. elcome, though I have my doubts that "thx" is correct English...
    2
  342.  @TheCourtsOfLove  Oh so sorry; just got back from having a life. Now where were we? Oh yes: grammar. Cambridge dictionary definition: "(the study or use of) the rules about how words change their form and combine with other words to make sentences" When I use the word grammar, it's because I'm talking about the username being at the beginning of the sentence. See? The interaction (or not) of words affecting the sentence structure, requiring punctuation (or not) in function of how the words are used. When I talked about the full stop, I used the word punctuation, did I not? The whole point of all that anyway was to draw your attention to your poor reply earlier on to @xin wei Koh : "- cough at least I know English". Lack of argument makes you resort to criticizing the English of someone who may well not have English as a first language. Who cares about a bit of punctuation and/or grammar when you understand perfectly the intention? That's the point. A shame, because up til then I agreed...
    2
  343.  @shortymcshort1375  It makes me think of the Jim Jeffries sketch on gun control, where he says it's funny how all these people obsessed with protecting their family and home never seem to boast about their reinforced security doors. Just admit you like guns!
    2
  344.  @shortymcshort1375  Same.... but I'm not so keen on his show as his standup. Any good Aussies to recommend? I grew up at the time of Paul Hogan (no great reference now, but at the time he seemed good!), but since then I don't know much in the way of Australian comics. I hear Daniel Muggleton's doing well though (if you get that reference, I tip my hat way down)!
    2
  345. La France, pays de la laïcité : Circulez librement le soir de Noël, restez confiné le jour de l'an....
    2
  346. You should see what some silly people are commenting two years later! There's a whole world of ignorance out there...
    2
  347.  @Simbadagreat13  Are you being serious? No... I think you're trolling. But I'll answer anyway. I think everyone should live.Don't you?
    2
  348. Really? Was she really screaming? Something tells me you've never been screamed at!
    2
  349. Erm.... I think you'll find he's just been chatting with scientists. Think of it this way: A fireman tells you your house will explode if you don't fix that gas leak before switching the lights on. He knows this from all the past research that has been done linking explosions to sparks and gas. It's starting to smell like gas.... what do we do?
    2
  350.  @kieran2790  Je n'ai pas vu les images, mais il me semble que les LBD (lanceur de balle de DÉFENSE ) ne sont à utiliser que dans des conditions bien spécifiques. Faire descendre quelqu'un qui est pacifiquement assis d'un véhicule n'en fait pas parti.
    2
  351.  Sharpshooter 02  I wondered when someone would have to state the obvious....
    2
  352. Love how you do crinkly edges , man!
    1
  353. So this one talks about mobile phone apps.... again, it's not my thing, but I understand the logic "Cell phones have a huge potential in helping to make sure children get vaccinated, he said. Cell phones could be used to register births and then used to track children and make sure they get the lifesaving vaccines they need. As Gates sees it, using cell phones to remind patients has huge potential – including reminding mothers of prenatal care, keeping patients on their regimens of life-saving medication, and helping vaccinate children." I think we in the western world, where we have the luxury of being concerned about privacy rather than survival, may see mobile apps differently. But basically he's talking about sms reminders and the calender.... things we're all very used to!
    1
  354.  ML8593wy  Oh... thought it was now. Never mind; I hope there'll be some agreements made so that I won't lose all I've contributed all my working life living in France! Hope the "leavers" will be satisfied now. Maybe they'll come to realize what they're losing....
    1
  355.  ML8593wy  Yep... stupid move, wasn't it?
    1
  356. Nope. Lot's of people couldn't be bothered to listen and understand. They just listen to clickbait titles and facebook ads. Strangely enough though, many of them missed completely the title of this one, which actually gives a clue as to the conclusion of the equation!
    1
  357. Erm....sorry but I think you'll find that COVID19 comes from Corona Virus Disease 2019. Just saying... AS for CO2 levels: of course we won't have zero emissions. It's a question of excess emissions. Plant O2 production balances out with CO2 production, until you add industry into the equation.
    1
  358. Since when did Trump become an expert on running the country?
    1
  359. Hang on a minute.... that's not a cowbell! Could use at least some cowbell! Obviously not produced by Bruce.
    1
  360. Good job he doesn't intend making them himself then out of his garden shed.
    1
  361.  @solomonkane6442  Us Picts are still recovering from Norman attacks, Viking attacks, Romans, you name it....... and being told that white people have never been oppressed!
    1
  362.  @solomonkane6442  I agree. Romans had to build a wall to keep us out though!
    1
  363.  @solomonkane6442  I think I'm mixed with a lot of English, being born there and all. My name is Scottish though, and I like running around naked in the woods and scaring people (not necessarily at the same time)....and I think tartan mini-skirts are hot, so I think I must have at least 51% Pict blood! As for that wall, despite not having invented aquaducts and sewage systems, we still had ladders...
    1
  364.  @solomonkane6442  Oh, you people! Always claiming inventions: the first version of internet was invented by the Picts. We were only using basic computers at the time (Atari, Sinclair ZX, that kind of thing) but it's what helped us drive away the Romans. Of course we didn't have electricity yet, which means we had to shout the information from one place to another, but for the time it was pretty advanced stuff. The tartan mini skirts are for women, not me. Let's be clear on that one. Me running naked in the woods is entirely independent of scaring people.... but yes, it was me you saw. I remember it clearly.
    1
  365.  @solomonkane6442  Too dumb to have invented the internet?! Go on, culturally appropriate, see if I care! If we were so dumb, how come we were so good at painting ourselves with woad? Nobody else tried getting on internet with Spectrums or Ataris. We did, and we succeeded. Of course we weren't calling it internet back then...and bagpipes were involved.
    1
  366.  @alexa-fx2fb  And more people would be wearing tartan mini skirts (see above).
    1
  367. smh
    1
  368. No, you won't, because you've already been born. The 10 to 15% refers to the rate of population increase that will go down as living conditions improve.Therefore, it doesn't involve actual people being killed, just hypothetical ones not happening.
    1
  369.  @juliobaylac3002  So nothing to back up your claims then?
    1
  370.  @juliobaylac3002  I would like to see specific references that disprove climate change, how vaccines gain more money than lengthy treatments, and in what way Gates has a "depopulation agenda" for a start.
    1
  371.  @juliobaylac3002  Well thanks! That took some doing, didn't it? The burden of proof was indeed on you, "buddy", since you were the one making the original claims. That's why people responded to your post, asking for a bit of justification. Unfortunately of course your list is only books, which I'm not about to go out and buy just for the fun. Nothing against books: they constitute interesting references, but are not in themselves sources. They may contain sources: I hope they do! What would have been more immediately useful here in the youtube comments section would be direct links to scientific papers, for example. I know that may sound a bit "convenient", but that's the way it is; I'm not spending a single cent on what will probably be just someone else giving their opinion without any hard data to back them up. I do know "how it works", I'm not "new to this", but considering how you've chucked insults around up til now, behaving rather childishly, I don't have enough interest in your claims to buy those books. I've got a degree in Ecology, from a university that houses the UKs Climatic Research Centre (UEA Norwich), the first of its kind in Britain, back in 91. So no, I'm not new to this. Books will just give me more opinions, I want data. I also asked you to sketch out briefly why you think Gates has a depopulation agenda (working very badly apparently since the population has gone up by a billion since his 2010 talk) and why you think vaccines are more profitable than treatments.
    1
  372.  @juliobaylac3002  Looks like on this one you've included some articles and papers... I'll get back to you on those.
    1
  373.  @juliobaylac3002  I told you why books weren't useful to me here. Never mind if you don't wish to understand. Keep your insults to yourself.
    1
  374.  @juliobaylac3002  Funny how you're so aggressive about all this. I did say, didn't I, that in your second post you'd put links which were more of immediate use to me than the books? I also said "Nothing against books: they constitute interesting references, but are not in themselves sources. They may contain sources: I hope they do!" So the "books are no good" that you misquote me as saying ( just like many misquote Gates on population) is false. This is just the youtube comments section, not a commission, so relax a bit and give us an idea of why you think the "mainstream" view on climate is wrong, and why you think Gates wants to depopulate the Earth. Again, the burden of giving proof is on you, because you're the one expressing an opinion/idea. If I make lots of claims about the Easter Bunny, giant spaghetti monsters and the Loch Ness Monster it's up to me to prove they exist, not up to you to prove they don't. Many things cannot be disproved; that's just the way stuff works. I can give no evidence to say the Easter Bunny does not exist... but why should I anyway? He doesn't exist. If you come along and claim he does.... you need to prove it. "And you are right, you should not buy books that go against your prejudice and established understanding of a subject. You don’t want to go through that experience. I get it" You don't get it though, do you? You're putting words into my mouth.If I'm debating here it's precisely because I'm interested by what information others may have. You must be aware that youtube and google in general use algorithms which guide you in the same direction once you've started looking into something.To break free of that, you need outside links. Hence the importance of debating in the comments section. I sort of get the impression that you're trying to drown me in references, a bit like Kennedy does on his site... but I will look into them. Quality not quantity is important. You could've just given one or two of each topic for a start. Doesn't matter though; I know how to sort through all that. Would be curious to hear it all summed up briefly in your own words though. Something tells me I will be disappointed; much as I may try to keep an open mind, your tendency to misquote and jump to conclusions isn't encouraging. It shows a pretty blinkered attitude.
    1
  375.  @juliobaylac3002  Calling someone's comments idiotic and calling their reaction pathetic is rather insulting. If you don't understand that concept, there's no hope. Big attitude problem. When did you prove me wrong?
    1
  376. No he isn't a doctor: he's a man with lots of money who funds scientists. He doesn't want to vaccinate you; doctors do that.
    1
  377. Bill Gates talks toilets: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82pmo53FQIY
    1
  378. Hmm.... what makes you so certain of that?
    1
  379. Well you didn't get that very straight...
    1
  380. You don't.
    1
  381. So now it's up to the civilian to have basic training in how to deescalate a situation?
    1
  382.  @Jammersito  That's precisely what goes out the window when confronted by a stressful situation causing panic. Common sense tells us one thing, panic makes us react stupidly. In most situations we get away with it because we're not held at gunpoint.
    1
  383.  @tw3ntythr337  No mate, you're the fool if you can't understand such basic concepts. Apparently TED talks are too intellectual for you; go back to school.
    1
  384. Sorry but do you not understand the basics of how funding works? You can say what you like about Bill Gates, but keep it at least a bit real! You said : " He planned this, and is creating a Vaccine for it as a NON medical professional" Don't you realise how ridiculous that sounds? He's not making vaccines out of his garden shed! He gives money to laboratories that do the work. They're the experts, he's just the one who funds them. So the idea of not trusting "his" vaccines because "he" made them is quite frankly a stupid argument. Haven't you got anything more intelligent to say about him? Do at least a minimum of research please!
    1
  385. read my post just a bit further down: "My predicted conversation with any conspiracy theorist"
    1
  386. Well, the "reduction the amount of people also by vaccines" didn't work, did it? Ten years later, and we're one billion more. So maybe he meant something else...
    1
  387.  @garyzies3486  Yes! Hoard a maximum! Whatever you do don't share anything. Wouldn't want to be seen as being part of a society now, would you? Name of the game: selfishness, every man for himself, survival of the fittest... next step: Aryan race, Nazism.
    1
  388.  @garyzies3486  Actually in a way I agree, when you express it like that. Your first comment sounded a bit more extremist.
    1
  389. Yep.
    1
  390. Well you're f**ked then!
    1
  391. Don't you know how to speak English or what?
    1
  392. What's that supposed to prove? Cases go up one by one, so at any given moment, somewhere in the world, you'll get your numbers.
    1
  393. Very lazy of you. Try including the link next time.
    1
  394. This shows irrational panic reaction. ... perfectly normal. So cops should know about that... if they had even the most basic training.
    1
  395.  @earlthomas6295  What, by putting money into research on clean energy sources? Oh, wait....he does.
    1
  396. He's talking about excess CO2 from industry. Does that make it clearer to you?
    1
  397. Is that the only thing you have to comment on? So if she wasn't using paper, she'd be using what? A tablet, maybe? I suppose you imagine that a tablet involves less carbon than a bit of paper?
    1
  398.  @waydrix  Ou Coca-cola à la...... attend une minute.... peut être que finalement, ça n'a rien d'étrange! Il est juste étrange de considérer que parce que une plante dans la famille contient du thc, l'autre ne dois pas être comestible.... Par la même logique, on ne devrait pas mettre des champignons dans les recettes non plus, puisqu'il existe des hallucinogène.
    1
  399. En fait si: les jolies routes c'est pour pas abîmer la belle bagnole, les logements pour justifier un garage pour la belle bagnole, les ponts c'est pour pas mouiller la belle bagnole..... parce que si on veut une femme, il faut l'attirer avec une belle bagnole!!!
    1
  400. Don't you see the connection between Windows and viruses?!
    1
  401.  @elifnothing  Source, please.
    1
  402.  @H43339  I see you've never been to school.
    1
  403.  @toring61_52  Where do you get your idea of genocide from? Your first link has been taken down, so I don't know what it is, the second is just a preacher. What does he know about Bill Gates?
    1
  404.  @H43339  Ok I'll explain it to you: plants are adapted to their ecosystems. If you change the ecosystem by changing temperature, you bring about changes in things such as water, for example: note how a desert is very hot, but not much use for growing plants. Rises in temperature will shift and expand deserts. Sorry but your statement was so broad and unfounded....
    1
  405.  @H43339  We're talking about climate change, not greenhouses. If you can supply water to your greenhouse there's no problem. If your desert has got an oasis in it you're fine too....Better check up on what a desert is.
    1
  406.  @niccolodentesani8441  No, it's not a lapsus. He explains over and over again in interviews his reasoning: better healthcare gives people the luxury of having smaller families. In this speech he cuts corners a bit, probably because it's not the specific subject of the lecture. He says it very clearly in other lectures though. It's the model that the western world has followed. A combination of better health and contraception contributes to smaller family size. If your children all survive, you need to make less to insure your future. Contraception means you can space out births.We have small families by choice. You can still see a difference in family size even in Europe, from the last couple of generations.Rural families tend to be larger than in the city, because in previous generations more hands were needed to work on farms. A change in farming methods, as well as the general exodus towards the cities resulted in a decline in family size.
    1
  407.  @niccolodentesani8441  No it's not the same thing. A combination of living conditions and religious influence (acceptability of contraception) make for the smallest families in Europe. Sub-Saharian Africa has the largest. The difference between children dying or not being born is huge; in the one case, there's immense suffering, and in the other..... well, nothing. If you're talking about a purely statistical effect, then yes, there is still a difference. To make the example, if a family has ten children due to lack of contraception and/or the need for hands to work for the family, maybe three or four will survive (that's just an estimative example, don't take that as hard stats). In European society where survival is pretty much guaranteed, where mechanisation has reduced the need for labour, and religion (or lack of) has permitted contraception, families CHOOSE to have less children, thus bringing down the general expansion rate of the population. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1090668/average-household-size-worldwide-by-region/
    1
  408.  @jessedew26  I've just watched this video, and although I haven't gone through all the links provided for it, I've started going through some of them (placing more importance on reading the scientific papers rather than the news articles which just interpret). The problem with the links provided on polio is that they indicate an overall success of the vaccination programme! If mutant strains cause more effects than wild polio, it's precisely because the vaccination has worked to eradicate wild polio.Here's what they say (briefly; you can read the whole articles to complete): Correlation between Non-Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis Rates with Pulse Polio Frequency in India https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121585/pdf/ijerph-15-01755.pdf "5. Conclusions The polio eradication programme succeeded in drastically reducing the global spread of this disease, which was achieved through the use of immunization with OPV. While commending this enormous effort at eradication, our observation supports the hypothesis that the frequency of pulse polio administration is directly or indirectly related to the incidence of NPAFP. It is hoped that this finding will help continue efforts at optimizing the dose schedule of OPV administration and result in a reduction in NPAFP—which is a feasible hope, as the incidence of wild polio is currently at an all-time low." And this one: Mutant Strains Of Polio Vaccine Now Cause More Paralysis Than Wild Polio https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/06/28/534403083/mutant-strains-of-polio-vaccine-now-cause-more-paralysis-than-wild-polio "That eradication effort has been incredibly successful. In 1988, when the campaign began, there were 350,000 cases of polio around the world each year compared with the six so far this year. Zaffran credits the oral polio vaccine with getting the world incredibly close to wiping out a terrible disease. "Four regions of the world have totally eradicated the disease with the use of the oral polio vaccine," he notes. "Of course we need to recognize that there have been a few cases of children paralyzed because of the vaccine virus, which is regrettable. But, you know, from a public health perspective, the benefits far outweigh the risk." This one, with regards to malaria: First Results of Phase 3 Trial of RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine in African Children https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1102287 "Conclusions The RTS,S/AS01 vaccine provided protection against both clinical and severe malaria in African children. " "A malaria vaccine, deployed in combination with current malaria-control tools, could play an important role in future control and eventual elimination of malaria in Africa." So these papers basically say the opposite of what's being said in the video, which leads me to wonder why they've been included.... unless it's because the poster of this video didn't actually read them?
    1
  409.  @niccolodentesani8441  He didn't mention it in that phrase... but it's not the main subject of the lecture, so he doesn't elaborate much. Watch his other stuff. As for the situation in Africa, I'm not denying the poverty or the plundering by it's own leaders and the "Western World", but strangely enough, curable disease kills more than malnutrition: https://ourworldindata.org/causes-of-death In Europe, we only have "too few" children if we regulate immigration too much. "Too few" means what: not enough to replace the workforce? So bring them in from countries with an excess. It's what we've always done (after WW2 for example: massive immigration to compensate for the huge numbers killed in the war).
    1
  410.  @niccolodentesani8441  I know many curable diseases are also a result of poverty (through lack of infrastructure such as sewage treatment, clean water etc), but it's harder for a foundation to have an influence on the politics of a country, or world politics, than it is to treat the symptoms of the problem. It's not ideal, sure, but in the meantime children die, so what do you do? Save their lives with vaccines proven to work, or wait until the world becomes a fairer place?
    1
  411.  @seedplanter7173  Although this is a very good idea, it's difficult to put into practice due to the reluctance of people to participate in such altruistic actions. Also, the energy needed to power the wood chipper goes up exponentially with bone size. Would therefore only be economically viable using very small children. I hear NASA are working on it though in a bunker somewhere under the stage used in the superbowl halftime show. Beyoncé (God bless her), gave us a coded clue with her famous "woodchip" choreography.
    1
  412. @Noartist What roll would that be? A sausage roll?
    1
  413. ​@Noartist If you'd followed my comments, I already said I'm not here to dispute about what Bill Gates may or may not be. When you start watching a video after having seen an article, or read a paper or whatever, you do so to get a bit more of an idea of what the subject is, right? So when you watch a video, you go check on the comments to see what other people think; if there's a conflicting view, it might have a link to follow. What I hate about youtube is the algorithms creating the suggestions, which guide you despite yourself towards the same old opinions again and again. The comments section is useful for breaking out of that. But it's only useful if used intelligently. If I do my own quick fact check on the things being said, I come up time and time again with blatant lies, sneaky editing and misconceptions. I'm ranting about what people say he says.When you're confronted with rubbish like this, it puts you off looking up the rest, and discredits anything true which could well be buried under that mound of crap. What I consistently do in any debate I have is to encourage the use of cited sources, with links, so that the debate can stay interesting and useful. Sometimes I chuck in a bit of my twisted humour, which you either like or don't. Doesn't matter..........in my opinion! By the way, my computer runs on Linux. A detail, because I'm on this very platform talking about how bad it is, but a significant detail none the less. You've got to see the irony of that.
    1
  414.  @Svetkoshka  I bet that's not the primary cause of deforestation though? I agree though that it's stupid, because there's a lot of unused roof space which could be used instead probably, if it's anything like in my country.
    1
  415.  @deansheridan  I said sssshhh!! Don't go getting people confused!
    1
  416.  @Svetkoshka  Can't see any pics, but no problem, I'm willing to believe you.Try posting a link otherwise. Whatever the reasons, I think we'd agree that deforestation is a bad thing?
    1
  417.  @kevinjuniorgarciadelgado6948  Amen.
    1
  418. There's a limited amount of places where you can put dams, and they're not the ideal solution either, changing massively the environment around them, especially downstream.
    1
  419.  @roxxerface  I didn't say they don't work... just that you can't put dams everywhere. I hope you're right about gravity and sunlight providing enough energy.
    1
  420. Listen again.
    1
  421. Yeah...... what?
    1
  422.  @smoothshark1  So you're not vaccinated?
    1
  423.  @lonckelph  Foreign travel is a topic I didn't even think of raising; good point! How many of these anti-vaxxers go abroad with no vaccines?!
    1
  424.  @valentinovercellone1985  He never says "we could lower the population by 10-15%". He says "we could lower this". Talking about expansion rate. I know what you mean..... but please get the quote right!!
    1
  425. Quote from the very article you're citing: "Gates’ views on the pandemic are fairly mainstream, but he’s become a target of conspiracy theorists in recent weeks"
    1
  426. Ah! Thought I was alone here...
    1
  427. Didn't you already know?
    1
  428.  @lyriccmaster5681  I think that's the whole point...
    1
  429.  @jeremiahhosea1140  So what's your point?
    1
  430.  @jeremiahhosea1140  Of course it's incoherent; that was my point. Coming out with stuff and sticking "fact" in front of it doesn't make it true and doesn't make each point connect.
    1
  431. Pythagoras? A hoax. Ever actually seen a hypotenuse up close? No, me neither. Hoax.
    1
  432.  @ffxivonline5864  source?
    1
  433.  @TG-br7dr  Pas étonnant. Combien de manifestants?
    1
  434.  @equalizer1981  Qu'est qui justifie le tabassage? La bombe lacrymogène, interdit en intérieure, qui aurait pu cramer le bâtiment avec aux moins 6 personnes dedans? Un "sachet qui pourrait contenir de la résine de cannabis", est aussi décrit comme "énorme sacoche" qui sentait fort le stupéfiant... alors que le shit (résine) ne pu pas, contrairement à l'herbe. Tu le connais toi tout l'histoire? Les faits sont visibles.... le contexte n'a pas d'importance. Les flics ne doivent pas agir comme ça, c'est tout. S'ils se défendent en disant qu'ils subissent des provocations permanentes (ce qui n'est meme pas le cas ici, que je sache), on peut dire la même chose pour défendre ceux qui les caillassent. La différence c'est que ils sont censés être des professionnels.
    1
  435. I've tried explaining.... but conspiracy theorists don't like proof.
    1
  436. Because they understood what he was saying.
    1
  437.  @paolijno  No, I think they just understood.
    1
  438.  @paolijno  "most of the people". Come on.. if I have to explain that it's no wonder you don't understand Bill Gates. Make an effort!
    1
  439. Go tell the Pope that!
    1
  440. Trop facile ça! C'est exactement ça qu'ils attendent......
    1
  441.  @tw3ntythr337  Talk from 2010 (this one), population= 6.8 billion. Population today (10 years later) = 7.8 billion. Where's the reduction in population mate?
    1
  442. "This novel fabrication technique, called SEAL (Stamped Assembly of Polymer Layers), creates three-dimensional microparticles that resemble tiny coffee cups that can be filled with vaccines or drugs, which are sealed with a lid"  So it's not a microchip that will trace in any way; just so that we're clear on that. As for the India affair: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121585/pdf/ijerph-15-01755.pdf https://pib.gov.in/newsite/mbErel.aspx?relid=158277
    1
  443. I love it! Talking about the media spreading fear..... and the punishment of God in one breath! Oh the irony! That merits a gold medal for your comment, well done Karen! A shame, because I agree with you about the media...
    1
  444. @stk piercingis I think you addressed that to the wrong person: you should've replied to Odette.
    1
  445. @stk piercingis That's ok! Just for the record...
    1
  446. Multinational companies use private jets, yes. The cost of keeping staff waiting around in airports would be astronomical (when it's people with big salaries, an hour of their time costs a lot). Bill Gates goes everywhere in the world in the context of his various missions. Using public transport would be very inefficient, time-consuming and eventually detrimental to the tasks he wishes to accomplish. Now if you're taking your private jet to go partying in Ibiza it's a bit different.... but Bill doesn't look the partying type to me....
    1
  447.  @HaroRider03088  That's true enough... but the world is full of irony!
    1
  448.  @HaroRider03088  Ironic that so many people use computers with Windows to criticise Bill Gates too.... Personally I'm on Linux. Never met a Gates hater yet who doesn't use Windows!
    1
  449. Oh ok. That makes it all a lot clearer. Needs more cowbell though.
    1
  450. I don't know where you were in 1990....but moustaches like that were finished in the eighties!
    1
  451. Astrology isn't real. Change my mind.
    1
  452. Dumb, ignorant..... and often catholic.
    1
  453. I've always found girls ask for way more rough treatment than I'm willing to give.
    1
  454.  @kingsbotofamv9624  "Je n'ai rien contre les Homesexuel mais l'homosexualite en sois si, c'est contre nature !" Comment ça peut être contre nature? C'est bien la nature qui l'a fait! Il y a des labos qui fabriquent des homosexuels? Non. C'est la Nature qui a créée ça.
    1
  455. Go on then.
    1
  456. Nice one; I'd never seen that before.... it merits to be more widely seen!
    1
  457. I think you're going to have to wait a long time for your explanation! Hope you're patient...
    1
  458. Oui je suppose qu'il y en a plein qui sont content devant leurs télés... mais je ne sais pas si on peut appeler ça bien vivre. Chacun ses goûts, mais je ne connais absolument personne qui aime ni ciné, ni théâtre, spectacle, concert, festival, match de foot, grosses festivités (et les petites aussi), et j'en passe.... sans parler de tous les autres métiers qui dépendent de ça. Comme disait l'autre, on peut nous couper un bras et on vivra.... on n'a donc pas besoin de bras?
    1
  459.  @alliancefrancaise4895  Naa.I haven't got the Cable. To be honest I don't much watch TV at all!
    1
  460.  Nemesis  Thanks I was quite proud of that one myself! However, I'm not a conspiracy theorist. On the contrary. Here's a copy of a comment I've already left on a few videos, with always very unsurprising replies! My predicted conversation with any conspiracy theorist: Here's what will happen, if we debate a bit: You'll say "Bill Gates wants to kill half the population, he was chucked out of India, Melinda is a man." I'll ask you for your sources, you'll either say "google it" or "do your own research" or "I don't give links anymore," or « follow the money », or "watch the Corbett report" or you'll just carry on spouting random rubbish. Then I'll give you my sources, which clearly show you're wrong, but you'll refuse to read (yes READ, not watch, sorry!), saying it's all just biased reports paid by "Big Pharma". Conveniently for you, everything which doesn't go in your sense is sponsored by Bill Gates, including me and anyone else who disagrees with you. Since "almost all media" is apparently funded by Gates (funny how it includes media from every single country in the world), except what's on youtube (which is ironic because it's mainly thanks to him that we're on youtube in the first place), it's impossible to provide you with any evidence. Yet you will ask repeatedly, saying mine isn't good enough without giving any yourself. You will spout on about how evil he is, with lots of CAPITAL LETTERS (you're probably catholic, so I can understand that anyone who promotes contraception is evil to you, since you haven't evolved from the Dark Ages), and completely ignore anything I say. When I ask if at the very least you use Linux and not Windows, you won't reply. Am I wrong?
    1
  461.  Nemesis  I did send you a long-winded reply but it seems to have vanished (conspiracy!) but basically I said yeah, it's hard to sort through it all to get close to "truth". I place my "faith" in science, because imperfect as it is, it's the best system out there for people who do spend years researching one thing, who do make that monumental endeavor, to share their knowledge, with the rest of the community surveying and verifying everything they say.
    1
  462.  Nemesis  Like I said, it's the best system that exists, for the moment at least! Maybe we hear more and more about such things, but that's good news: it means more and more are being weeded out, or that the phenomenon is more communicated on.
    1
  463.  @newsdepartment9932  Source?
    1
  464.  @thoroughsoft  But why did he waste 9 minutes on it?
    1
  465.  @chrissutterby2870  Wasted a lot of valuable time to make one small point then.
    1
  466.  @D.a.n_D  Shouldn't he have spent more time on important subjects?
    1
  467. No.
    1
  468.  @terrygassner9805  Being terrified makes you panic react and common sense goes out the window. Police should know this and react accordingly; they're supposed to be trained to deal with stressful situations. The civilian isn't. Try standing still in a swarm of bees...
    1
  469.  @terrygassner9805  They seem to be badly trained then. A situation that could've been easily diffused ended in death.
    1
  470.  @terrygassner9805  No, I just come from a country where the police don't need to shoot everyone to get results.
    1
  471.  @terrygassner9805  Ok, first of all they don't shoot everybody.... just enough for people to be terrified of them. Secondly.... what? Remember, you first comment was "Being terrified stops the second you comply...got it?" I take issue with that: you don't go from terror to total calm in the blink of an eye when you comply...just won't happen.
    1
  472.  @terrygassner9805  Doesn' t merit death. No more to say!
    1
  473. Ok, so you've noted the amount of CO2 absorbed by a tree, and the number of trees.... but you don't mention how much CO2 is produced.
    1
  474. Sorry, but if a God was around to protect the people who made that hospital... he would probably have been more useful protecting the people that got ill in the first place! Conclusion: don't count on God for anything.
    1
  475.  @pesman2800  sssht! Tu vas pas amener de la logique la dedans s'il te plaît!
    1
  476.  @dowskivisionmagicaloracle8593  He was more entertaining when he was a footballer!
    1
  477.  @philipgeorgiev  But how many would die if you don't inject them? 0.1% isn't fine; it's better than sitting by and watching countless more die.
    1
  478.  @philipgeorgiev  "better drugs if needed"... what makes you suppose vaccines are so bad? Have you been forced to have vaccines "every five minutes"? "viruses mutated": do you have the slightest idea how vaccines are made?
    1
  479.  @philipgeorgiev  If they were so into profit, why not become bankers, traders, lawyers, rather than doctors? They picked a very bad job for becoming rich.
    1
  480.  @philipgeorgiev  My predicted conversation with any conspiracy theorist: Here's what will happen, if we debate a bit: You'll say "Bill Gates wants to kill half the population, he was chucked out of India, Melinda is a man." I'll ask you for your sources, you'll either say "google it" or "do your own research" or "I don't give links anymore," or « follow the money », or "watch the Corbett report" or you'll just carry on spouting random rubbish. Then I'll give you my sources, which clearly show you're wrong, but you'll refuse to read (yes READ, not watch, sorry!), saying it's all just biased reports paid by "Big Pharma". Conveniently for you, everything which doesn't go in your sense is sponsored by Bill Gates, including me and anyone else who disagrees with you. Since "almost all media" is apparently funded by Gates (funny how it includes media from every single country in the world), except what's on youtube (which is ironic because it's mainly thanks to him that we're on youtube in the first place), it's impossible to provide you with any evidence. Yet you will ask repeatedly, saying mine isn't good enough without giving any yourself. You will spout on about how evil he is, with lots of CAPITAL LETTERS (you're probably catholic, so I can understand that anyone who promotes contraception is evil to you, since you haven't evolved from the Dark Ages), and completely ignore anything I say. When I ask if at the very least you use Linux and not Windows, you won't reply. Am I wrong?
    1
  481. ​ @b.l.a.biglovealwaysbiglove4053  Ok, let me go through some of those points.First of all, when it comes to accusations, it's up to the accuser to provide evidence. Just saying. With regards to Epstein, for example (which I haven't looked into at all), I could never prove he hasn't been on the Lolita express: I can't prove I haven't either! It can only be proved if he has.Is that the case? I don't know, I haven't looked into that at all. So if there is evidence for that I'd be happy to see it . Damaging people through vaccines: now there's a difficult one as well! As we all know, vaccines aren't 100% safe; nothing is. That's why there are the vaccine courts. That's why research continues permanently to improve them. We don't have the same heavy vaccine schedule in Europe as in the States, so there hasn't been so much controversy over that. I've seen stuff on autism which seems quite convincing, but I've also seen plenty that says it's not related to vaccines. Seems like there's still some doubt on that, which is to be battled among the scientists. The GMOs is pretty much the same thing, and I'm not going to take a stance on that either; I'll leave that to the scientists. Why he is listened to? Because he's perfect for the media; a figurehead, household name... who is surrounded by the top of the experts, so pretty well informed, I think.Is he a good person? I don't know. I think he's trying to do good things, but if he's doing it right is another matter. Maybe he is getting richer at the same time, maybe not if he gives it away. Now let's have a look at the things which have convinced me: You'll notice my main critic is of stupid conspiracy theories, such as sterilising women in Africa.This one comes up often but was easily debunked: https://africacheck.org/fbcheck/25-years-on-rumour-by-us-anti-contraceptive-organisation-still-damages-tetanus-vaccine-programmes/ Yeah I know; some say any factcheck site is no good. They cite sources though, so it's not the article itself to which I refer but the sources contained in it. Next, they say he was chucked out of India. Debunked in five minutes: https://web.archive.org/web/20200502090716/https://pib.gov.in/newsite/mbErel.aspx?relid=158277 All a mix up of various stories, amalgamated together into a lie. They say he wants to reduce the population and cite "that " equation: CO2 = P x S x E x C They deliberately omit to carry on to the end when speaking of it and say he wants to reduce P, when in fact it's C. P= people S= services per person E= energy per service C = carbon dioxide per unit energy The last one, C, must come down to zero because all the others will increase, even if you slow down the rate of increase. "Innovating to zero" = creating alternative energy sources that do not produce CO2. Simple maths: anything x anything x anything x zero = zero. Micro chipping through vaccines is another common one, with reference made to ID2020, where the idea is in fact to give people biometric ID papers or cards when they go in to get vaccinated, thus killing two birds with one stone, to use a rather unfortunate term! Nothing to do with actually injecting people with microchips! https://www.biometricupdate.com/201909/id2020-and-partners-launch-program-to-provide-digital-id-with-vaccines What gets me is that even people such as Kennedy have some of these lies on their sites; the population reduction one, for example, which is just so ridiculously easy to disprove. It tends to discredit anything else on their sites which may be founded. Stage three demographic transition ( or why population increase slows down with better living conditions): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition#Stage_three https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview https://ourworldindata.org/a-history-of-global-living-conditions-in-5-charts https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy https://www.pnas.org/content/117/10/5250 What else? How about a bit of random info: Danish study on lack of cause of autism by vaccines : https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M18-2101 CDC court case: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/04/vaccines-trial-us-court-separates-fact-fiction safety of vaccines : https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/134/2/325 https://www.advancedped.com/not-foiled-story-aluminum-vaccines/ https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/112/6/1394 https://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-07/how-biological-patents-promote-research-and-save-lives/ Article in Nature Medecine about origins of COVID 19, by multiple authors from USA, UK and Australia : https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9 But here's a bit of fun, which still proves some points anyway (or not, but so what?!) Louis CK – Everything is amazing and nobody is happy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdFB7q89_3U Snakes have legs ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HXMYm4k6w0 Life of Brian- The shoe is the sign https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ka9mfZbTFbk Monty Python – Argument https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohDB5gbtaEQ Ronnie Corbett – Blackberry https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAG39jKi0lI
    1
  482.  @b.l.a.biglovealwaysbiglove4053  After my rather long-winded reply, my shorter reply would be that just because some things may be true doesn't mean it all is! So the question is, which accusations are backed up by anything other than media articles that cite each other as sources, hearsay, deliberate misinterpretation of his words, and pure invention?
    1
  483. @Phuket Wurd No it was a she. Otherwise it'd have been a steward. I'd have noticed. At least I think so....
    1
  484. @Phuket Wurd Keep your fluid away from me, young man....or woman, or whatever you may identify as! As for the ostrich cage, are you making fun of my penchant for nudity in Struthionidae aviaries....and how did you find out about it?
    1
  485.  @usmlegb6411  So if I understand right.... high-speed stoping without first making sure there's an object inside that which does all the stoping is a bad idea?
    1
  486.  @usmlegb6411  Oh and does the "idot " have anything to do with digital ID under-the-skin micro-chipping with fluorescent quantum dots?
    1
  487. @Anto Erickson You've got it all sooo mixed up man!
    1
  488.  @nectarcloud7769  I don't.
    1
  489. Now look what you've done; you've got the kpop fans going on about how nice and respectful everyone is to everyone else except the others of course. Once you've got them going they'll never stop.
    1
  490.  @finna.h7944  Too right; never risk waking up the kpop stans!
    1
  491.  blink army chichi  And erm.....to change the (fascinating) subject: what did you guys think of the MIA clip?
    1
  492.  blink army chichi  Ah! That's what I like to hear! No need for slutty gyrating half-naked, lyrics to be read on at least three levels, a video that goes way beyond the rap stereotypes.... I call this art. However it's "boy", for me, not "girl", but that's ok! ;) Hope you enjoy the rest of her stuff too.
    1
  493.  blink army chichi  no worries!
    1
  494. Firemen obviously light fires. How would they know where they are otherwise?
    1
  495.  @fabianboesch96  Firemen obviously light fires. How would they know where they are otherwise?
    1
  496.  @malcolmhurst8802  A spring.
    1
  497.  @matthewnicholas1550  Someone bit it.
    1
  498.  @marcocettani5452  Six jours plus tard..... Voila. T'as ta réponse! ;)
    1
  499. "tant de sauvagerie": vous rigolez ou quoi? Elle est fragile à ce point là, que deux hommes sont trop pour elle dans un débat?!! Non. Elle n'avait pas d'argument, c'est tout. Si elle voulait plus la parole, elle n'avait que à la prendre. Pourquoi on doit toujours avoir ces débats? Parce qu'il y a toujours des féministes radicales qui refusent d'admettre qu'elles ont l'égalité déjà, c'est juste qu'elles ne savent pas s'en servir. "C'est comme si tout d'un coup il y'avait des débats à la télé si vous aviez le droit de vivre ou non": c'est effectivement un débat qui existe encore et heureusement: peine de mort, avortement etc... droit de vivre, quoi!
    1
  500.  @coucoutoi4176  Vous avez quelque chose à dire peut être?
    1
  501.  @Pollypocket712  Pas de discussion non plus?
    1
  502. If the Earth really is flat........ how do you account for mountains?
    1
  503.  @johnbrowning3986  The fact that you have seen this comment before means that obviously great minds think alike.
    1
  504. Wow! How did they manage that?
    1
  505.  @florentthiry2625  Wow, comment t'as fait ça? T'as fait une commentaire il y a 3 min, auquel t'as répondu il y a 6 min! Ça sent le voyageur dans le temps...
    1
  506.  @35millimetre  Have you listened beyond 38 seconds yet, to know what he's actually talking about?
    1
  507.  @larryjohnson5163  Nobody is "eliminating". Please! Is it really too hard to understand?
    1
  508. There's a difference between a simple theory, that you then gather evidence to support or negate, and conspiracy theory, where evidence is allegedly kept back and people conspire to hide the truth.
    1
  509. Erm no..... he doesn't want to micro-chip anybody. It's "quantum dot tattoo", which is completely different. It's just a dye that will show up if you look for it. No satellite connection to trace you, no self destruct mechanism implanted in your body, no evil 666 bar code... All that shit is already in your telephone!
    1
  510. Grow up..... yeah; that's what being young is all about, isn't it? Maybe if their parents' and grand parents' generations didn't create such a mess in the first place, and vote for the free market economy, we wouldn't be in this mess today? Maybe if they'd given them an education... No, you're right; blame it all on the young! How could it be anything other than their fault?
    1
  511.  @CookInTech84  Thanks for that example of crap posted!
    1
  512. Shit....! I'd better download all the episodes of Game of Thrones now, then.
    1
  513. To be fair, we get lied to every day by our governments. We get lied to by corporations. We get......well, you get it.
    1
  514.  @MachineGod69  True
    1
  515.  @andrewrao634  Excellent!!
    1
  516. Oui c'est pour installer son micro.... ;)
    1
  517.  @bggamersway872  Quel vidéo?
    1
  518.  @bggamersway872  retourne à tes jeux!
    1
  519. What about the ones that call it a PLANdemic (capital letters obligatory)?
    1
  520. Ok.... mais sur 70 000 agressions tout confondu, combien sont des femmes?
    1
  521.  @marcusmaximus9318  Ok pardon, je comprends!
    1
  522.  @marcusmaximus9318  Oui oui, je comprends; 100% des divorces sont suite aux mariages...mais les viols c'est pas tout a fait pareil, d’où le confusion.
    1
  523.  @ugandaknuckles5691  Pretty dumb yeah... I've got this one though: « regardless of what is being written is true or not. I just follow my guts » -Nara Perry (some youtube commenter who replied to me the other day)
    1
  524.  @ugandaknuckles5691  I just picked up another one on this very thread: athar55 3 weeks ago: "Did some one notice he does not look at Ted when he is answering his questions,why? " Isn't that just brilliant? Thinking that Chris Anderson is called Ted, because it's a TED talk?!! Kind of shows the level we're dealing with. I suppose you can't expect them to understand complicated things like equations (you know, THAT equation), or ....reality!
    1
  525. Because it's 50 year old priests doing it with ten year old boys.
    1
  526. What utter rubbish. Why show black children when talking about the poor? Because the poorest countries are African maybe? Who should receive the vaccine first? Probably those most at risk.... "people like Bill ".... No: people. People that weren't Bill Gates because we're talking about hundreds of years ago. Why not say "people like me"? Science used to oppress people? Yes... but also the opposite. Are you oppressed by your computer? Are you oppressed by your nice comfy car? Are you oppressed by the heating in your home, the doctors who cure you, the planes that take you across the world in a few hours, the ...... you get the picture. Eugenics and Darwinism are not the same thing. Darwinism is how nature works.It's how you got to be here now. In what way is it "the gasoline of hate and oppression?" I think as much, or probably way more oppression and hate has come from religion than science. "Fight the good fight"? See: you're already talking oppression!
    1
  527. Why do you deliberately misquote him? That's very dishonest of you.... unless it was a mistake: go back and listen again, then come back here and explain yourself.
    1
  528.  @stubbinsky  To Synergy Girl. You're one of the rare people who have understood him! It's incredible isn't it the number of people who are 1: incabable of listening and 2: incapable of quoting correctly. I try to avoid calling people idiots personally.... but sometimes it gets too frustrating! That's probably when it's time to give up and let them get on with it! The thing is though, they seem to be reproducing....
    1
  529.  @synergygirl1209  "A fake person set up by the handlers of youtube".....and you think it's me who has the problem?! I rest my case.
    1
  530.  @synergygirl1209  I'll give it one last shot, and if you still haven't understood I give up. Let me do your homework for you, as you obviously have a problem with it. First, here are the exact words he uses, which even if isolated, without all the rest of the context, should still be understandable just by applying very simple logic: "Now the world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 %, but there we see an increase of about 1.3." Ok up til there? Now for the complicated bit (too complicated apparently for a number of people, but let's try to make it simple. He explains his equation, saying that one of the values needs to come down close to zero, which provokes laughter from the audience because indeed, if you want to bring the result down to zero, three of the factors can be any value you want, but as long as the fourth is zero, you end up with zero. Something x something x something x zero = zero. Still ok? He says the population will go from 6.8 billion to 9 billion, which is by anyone's standards an increase. 9 divided by 6.8 =1.32. He mentions this increase of 1.3 : "we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%, but there we see an increase of 1.3". Note that the ten or fifteen percent corresponds to the 1.3 figure. Reduce the 1.3 by 10-15% and you get 1.13- 1.18. Still an increase in population, but 10- 15% less. I don't know how it can get any clearer than that really. Especially when he goes on to say that the next two factors should stay high, but the last one (CO2 emission) needs to come right down. Everything he says points to a continued population increase (up to a more stable level of around 9 billion.Others suggest even higher, but that's not the point here). He adds to all this here (TED 2015): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Af6b_wyiwI And here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obRG-2jurz0 Here's another guy (Hans Rosling) explaining how population will level itself out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usdJgEwMinM Now I've given you simple explanations, sources to back me up, and I've tried (but I'll admit it's hard) to avoid falling into childish insults and paranoid delusion ("fake person set up by the handlers of youtube" as you so eloquently put it). What have you brought to the discussion? Funny how some people can't resist using that overused word "sheeple". Just using the word speaks volumes in itself!
    1
  531.  @synergygirl1209  By the way, if you, as a "straight A medical student" think a "nano vaccine" can "mind control" me... I hope you never get anywhere near me in a hospital!!
    1
  532. @Green However you want to interpret the maths, he' talking about the increase. So when you say he's obsessed with population reduction I say no, sorry: 6.8 to 7 or 8 or 9 is not a reduction in anyone's book! Sure sterilisation by vaccine is technically possible; so are many things. You just don't mix everything up.You can by all means be concerned about the possibility of something, but you look for evidence, and when you find it you put it out there. As long as you have no evidence, you've got no right to accuse.Investigate, fine, but wait til you've got the answers before wildly speculating. As for knowing why family size goes down with better living conditions, take a look at this guy, for example, in case you haven't seen the link already further up. It's a bit old now, but shows that Bill Gates is not alone in thinking that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LyzBoHo5EI
    1
  533. @Green As for the math, you're actually agreeing with me: (the 1.3 increase, cutting by 10-15% to 1.13 or 1.18 is the rate of increase in the population. We're talking about slowing down an increase. It's clearer to say "slowing down an increase" then "reducing an increase", because reduction and increase are opposites that don't fit together well in a sentence. 6.8 to 8.1 is an increase. It's just an increase that takes more time to get to the same level. He doesn't give a date, so there's no reason to stop at 8.1. That's why I think it's 9 billion from demographic data, and 10-15% refers to the increase rate. mathematically, what isn't made clear in the talk (because it's not really the main thing he's talking about, or because he assumes we're good at maths!) is what the 1.3 increase corresponds to exactly: is it 1.3 percent of the population by year,? We can probably assume that it is. It would be odd to give a daily or weekly figure... Whatever, you can't say "population reduction" because it's going up. If the elite wanted to cut drastically the population, they could've done it by simply not imposing lockdown everywhere (if Covid 19 is really that mortal), or if they're so clever, putting out a really effective virus? The number of deaths has been minimal. Lockdown was all about taking the burden off hospitals, because our governments have all been too stupid to maintain proper health services. This is why we must not forget, must not let them off the hook. Worrying about whether Bill Gates is the Antichrist distracts us from the main issue of bad governing. Investigation sure, always. But don't burn the witch until you've got solid proof.Too much at stake! (what a pun; proud of myself!)
    1
  534. @Green While I'm at it, just so that this stuff gets seen in the comments, rather than drowned in all the christian indignation, let me repeat some interesting links: On polio vaccines in India : Correlation between Non-Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis Rates with Pulse Polio Frequency in India https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121585/pdf/ijerph-15-01755.pdf Brief extract of the conclusions : "5. Conclusions The polio eradication programme succeeded in drastically reducing the global spread of this disease, which was achieved through the use of immunization with OPV. While commending this enormous effort at eradication, our observation supports the hypothesis that the frequency of pulse polio administration is directly or indirectly related to the incidence of NPAFP. It is hoped that this finding will help continue efforts at optimizing the dose schedule of OPV administration and result in a reduction in NPAFP—which is a feasible hope, as the incidence of wild polio is currently at an all-time low." And this one, explaining why the vaccine causes more cases now of polio than the natural strain : Mutant Strains Of Polio Vaccine Now Cause More Paralysis Than Wild Polio https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/06/28/534403083/mutant-strains-of-polio-vaccine-now-cause-more-paralysis-than-wild-polio "That eradication effort has been incredibly successful. In 1988, when the campaign began, there were 350,000 cases of polio around the world each year compared with the six so far this year. Zaffran credits the oral polio vaccine with getting the world incredibly close to wiping out a terrible disease. "Four regions of the world have totally eradicated the disease with the use of the oral polio vaccine," he notes. "Of course we need to recognize that there have been a few cases of children paralyzed because of the vaccine virus, which is regrettable. But, you know, from a public health perspective, the benefits far outweigh the risk." This one, with regards to malaria: First Results of Phase 3 Trial of RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine in African Children https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1102287 "Conclusions The RTS,S/AS01 vaccine provided protection against both clinical and severe malaria in African children. " "A malaria vaccine, deployed in combination with current malaria-control tools, could play an important role in future control and eventual elimination of malaria in Africa." Tetanus and fertility vaccine in Africa: https://africacheck.org/fbcheck/25-years-on-rumour-by-us-anti-contraceptive-organisation-still-damages-tetanus-vaccine-programmes/ Bill Gates was not chucked out of India : press release from Indian government : Sorry the direct link doesn't work anymore, but at least you can get to it eventually if you want to check. click on the Press Information Bureau link: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetail.aspx?PRID=1568914 Then write in the date on the left: 8 february 2017, then scroll down underneath through all the other press releases of the day until you get to "press note". It's all in alphabetical order, so easy to find. You will then see on the main window the complete press note. Here's an extract from the end: "Some media reports have suggested that all health related collaboration with the Gates Foundation with National Health Mission (NHM) has been stopped. This is inaccurate and misleading. BMGF continues to collaborate and support the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare."
    1
  535. Il a été condamné pour quoi?
    1
  536.  @lise6164  Peut être qu'il voit plus loin que son nombril, lui?
    1
  537.  @omatofi  What's the difference?
    1
  538.  @aeneasshinas2759  Thanks, "my friend": you just proved me right! We're on the subject of Bill Gates, and you give me two videos, one about Bush, one about 5G. I get the point of putting in the Bush one... but it still gives nothing on Gates. Politicians are professional liars. I never said you could trust governments.The other one is a typical youtube video: menacing music, extrapolation, and no sources. You talk about a"great science based video", but if I mention science, you say it's biased, no good lies. You have proved my point so well, I could imagine it's someone who agrees with me that posted the comment for fun! You even put the sheep bit in! Your "independent sound studies" (which ones exactly?) basically means "non-peer reviewed". Thanks again, keep up the good work!
    1
  539.  @aeneasshinas2759  No. I'm talking about science and how the scientific community is structured deliberately to weed out liars, or poor research. truth is the only important thing in science.Politicians are not peer reviewed. Their job is to get re-elected.
    1
  540.  @aeneasshinas2759  Thanks. You just proved me right again!
    1
  541.  @aeneasshinas2759  Sorry but what have you proved? I must've missed something.... All you've given me is an anecdote, which I have absolutely no reason to believe, and even if I did, so what? A friend of your wife had an experience... does this prove a generality? Look at it from my perspective to see how silly that sounds: "I was talking with some guy on youtube who says his wife has a friend that...etc". You've got to admit, that's not going to convince anyone, and it shouldn't! So you're not going to waste your time with me anymore..... you just confirmed more of my prediction. You have shared no knowledge, we have had no debate about Bill Gates because you steered onto another subject, probably because you know you have nothing to say about him. That is not how debates go. That is refusal to debate. By the way, does your computer run on Linux?!
    1
  542.  @aeneasshinas2759  (For anybody else reading all this, disclaimer: Aeneas Shinas is not paid by me to prove my points, even if it looks that way! The proof of that is there has been no shouting in capital letters.... I therefore suspect him/her of not being a catholic. The word "evil" hasn't cropped up either. I'm almost disappointed. It's made up for though by the almost sublime total ignoring of the Linux question, which I've asked twice! Let's add a third). Does your computer run on Linux? If you were on a Mac, I think you'd have said so straight away, embarrassing though that might be, because it's kind of hard to say that Steve Jobs is any better than Bill Gates. Am I a Gates "fan"? No. I'm defending science, the quest for truth, critical thinking, useful and intelligent debate, and showing that I'm way better at predictions than Nostradamus ever was! ;)
    1
  543. I guess he was running on Windows, then. :( Edit: 4 months later..... he's definitely running on Windows, or preparing a very long reply!
    1
  544. C'est le cas de le dire!
    1
  545.  @denysaidan4886  Il a purgé sa peine, que je sache?
    1
  546.  @denysaidan4886  On peut effectivement remettre en cause tout le système judiciaire (ce qui n'est peut être pas une mauvaise idée!), mais en attendant, ces faits là remontent à plus de 10 ans et je ne connais pas de détails, mais on peut supposer qu'il ne s'est pas échappé de prison. Dans cette société, on offre une deuxième chance aux gens. Il est devenu producteur de musique, et qu'on aime ou pas le style, c'est plutôt inséré dans la société. Les flics je les donnerait une deuxième chance aussi; s'ils purgent leurs peines d'abord. Quand je parle de purger une peine, pour l'un ou les autres, je ne parle pas de vengeance et punition, mais surtout de soigner la personne, qui agit ainsi sûrement pour des raisons profondes.
    1
  547. Don't you know how to spell fuck?
    1
  548. Don't panic, just listen to the rest; you'll end up understanding.
    1
  549. Bill Gates never has talked about depopulation as a goal. Where have you moved to, Brazil? Oh sorry; no 5G but plenty of COVID... must be another one then.
    1
  550.  @nickob55  So what are you saying, 5G is installed everywhere in Brazil?
    1
  551.  @GreenKiweez  I think you can actually function with way less sleep if you organise well; I seem to recall hearing that since sleep is in cycles of 4 hours, it's better to sleep 4 hours than 7, for example, because you'd have a broken second cycle which leaves you tired when you wake up... Don't fancy it myslf though: 8 is fine for me!!
    1
  552. Or like a predictable occurrence.
    1
  553.  @Kahfman  " no, definitely not predictable occurrence": So, basically you're saying that despite virologists dedicating their lives to researching, despite the blindingly obvious possibilities of rapid circulation of viruses due to the world being opened up since the 1970s to mass travel on charter flights, despite other pandemics having already happened, nobody could've foreseen this one?
    1
  554.  @cateatfood6634  Oh, you can still see the count? That's curious...which country are you in?
    1
  555.  @cateatfood6634  Wow...how did you fall upon that?! Cheers anyway.
    1
  556.  @jeannabug94  Here's an exercise for you: write down exactly what he says from around 4:00 to 5:00, then read it back.
    1
  557.  @habibmohammed2779  Can you explain why population in European countries is nearly stable?
    1
  558.  @jeannabug94  I give up. Stop just watching: write it down, come back here and quote it.
    1
  559.  @kasiechandler6424  Sigh..... No; he says we can reduce the rate of increase.It'll get to 9 billion, but take longer to do so.
    1
  560.  @HEART2HEART369  This is ridiculous. If you people can't understand plain English I can't help you. .... but I'll give it one last try, because I'm stubborn. Deep breath.... Let's look at his exact words: "Now the world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 %, but there we see an increase of about 1.3." 2010 : 6.8 billion people 2020 : around 7.8 billion We are going towards 9 billions (more like 10 or 11 based on the last ten years of data), is indeed the growth projection. He says with vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could decrease the GROWTH (of population) by 10-15%. He doesn't say the word growth but because he spoke of 9 billion in the future compared to 6.8B in 2010, the idea is to perhaps not reach asap this 9B. He mentions a "1.3 value", this is an increase of 1.3 (9billion/6.8billion= 1.32) and what he means is to reduce this 1.3 factor by 10-15% (so reaching 1.13 to 1.18 or so instead of *1.3 growth) E) He continues his exposé to find ways to lower the value of S, E and C in his equation. All the data shows that when you make living conditions better , people CHOOSE to have smaller families. Now, where do I get all this from? I'll give you some sources: Improvement in world health and living conditions : https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview https://ourworldindata.org/a-history-of-global-living-conditions-in-5-charts https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy https://www.pnas.org/content/117/10/5250 Stage three demographic transition ( or why population increase slows down with better living conditions): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition#Stage_three The Best stats you’ve ever seen -Hans Rosling https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usdJgEwMinM Bill Gates explains concept : does saving more lives lead to overpopulation ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obRG-2jurz0 I know what you're going to say: this data is "biased and comes from Big Pharma". I challenge you to disprove any of it.... with unbiased data. Looking through this thread, not one person has come up with any proof whatsoever. Nobody is even capable of understanding that 9 is bigger than 6.8! So if you're even slightly more intelligent than the others here, you should be able to reply with something other than "watch the Corbett Report", "google it", "do your own research", "wake up sheeple".
    1
  561.  @HEART2HEART369  By the way, I don't think it was clever the way he worded it; the proof is that some people misinterpret it. He cut corners because he assumed people knew what he was talking about I reckon. The factor involved, as you said, is improvement of living conditions, including health and therefore vaccines. African women have not been sterilised by vaccines you're mixing everything up. Again, show me real evidence of that, and not some catholic bishop who knows nothing of science, but has his own agenda. Catholics hate contraception, so it's normal they hate Gates.The rest of the world understands the importance of contraception. Nobody is sterilised against their will with vaccines.
    1
  562.  @johnkean6852  Stop believing life is a Bond movie.
    1
  563.  @portelm3137  Reduce population Growth, not population! ;)
    1
  564. @BattleAngelFan Well I'll just have a side salad then please. .... oh and fuck it give me one of those tasty "chief-size" bison burgers as well, with samurai sauce and french fries. Plenty of salt.
    1
  565.  @holysex1052  ... ... ... ... ...You don't get the impression that your abusing my goodwill in any way? ....Hmmm? ...I mean, for the delay ok, it happens. For the window, I get the ideology bit. For the air particles, I should've asked first; didn't think. BUT NOT TAKING A BLOODY CHECK?!!!! I mean for ** fucks sake (whoops; I missed with the *), you're still LEGALLY OBLIGED to take them! You don't get to pick and choose how I pay! Now take my fucking * (damn; overcompensated with the **) check and no, I won't provide three different IDs with it. F**k it (oh at last, spot on)!
    1
  566. Je suis content de voir que ce n'est pas que moi que ça dérange! Horrible travail de cadrage. Pourtant, ils sont bien présent les cadreurs!!
    1
  567.  @chrispalko9483  Really? When was that?
    1
  568.  @chrispalko9483  Firstly, you give nothing, just a random statement which in itself has no meaning, then you do even worse by giving some letters and a date.. Secondly, please explain this: https://web.archive.org/web/20200502090716/https://pib.gov.in/newsite/mbErel.aspx?relid=158277 (P.S. don't bother telling me what HPV is, I know).
    1
  569.  @chrispalko9483  Hi! Haha; I read back those posts and yeah, sorry, it did sound a little harsh from me! My bad. On to the subject matter though... I'm glad you noticed you got the wrong country; that's the sort of thing that can easily start unfounded rumours, so it's good to correct it I think. As for furnishing evidence, I would've thought it's primordial here: are we here to discuss and share our views, or just to blurt out statements? Generally speaking, it's up to the person making the claims to prove them. That's why I picked up (rather clumsily I admit) on the HPV 2010; I would've liked to see a link or two, rather than just a subject. If you don't want to bring any evidence to the discussion, that's fine....; but it's not much of a discussion in that case. I personally find peoples' links very useful for researching a subject that interests me; we all know how the youtube algorithms guide us always in one direction, so it's good to have opposite views reflected in the comments section, which lead to other directions of research through the links they provide. If they provide no links, it makes them way less interesting. After all, I can claim absolutely anything, but if I don't back it up with something, it's just hot air. I hope that wasn't too much of a rant for you! ;)
    1
  570.  @chrispalko9483  Yeah, it's all too easy to get wound up on youtube... and there are indeed a lot of trolls! At least, I hope for their sakes they're trolls, otherwise humanity is in very bad shape! No evidence, then?! :)
    1
  571.  @Hannah-1919  Comme tout le monde quoi....
    1
  572. Regarde un peu sur le site de leur fondation. Tu verras que beaucoup d'argent est dépensé aux États Unis.
    1
  573. Yeah but rastas also think Jesus came back.
    1
  574. So...ten years ago he said this (whatever insanity you think he said).....and ten years later there's a billion more people on the planet. Please explain how he's going about reducing the population? He seems to be doing it all very wrong...
    1
  575.  @milli3leven377  I didn't say it was. I just said sex education is important, because I disagreed with "If a couple is inlove with each other, they will surely be able to have a good sex NATURALLY"
    1
  576.  @milli3leven377  Or maybe being single causes depression, anxiety ad stress? No , I take that back; it's being in a couple that does all that!
    1
  577. Praise the voters, certainly not the Lord...
    1
  578. Personally I don't like the idea of a contraceptive chip, even if it does already exist in other forms... but anyway it's not being linked to vaccines; the article just says there's a potential to use the technology for administering other drugs.
    1
  579. Ebola: Source? Funny how people think they can make such claims without having to justify themselves. .. IT guy talking diseases: Yes... he's extremely rich and has access to the highest level expert advice. "We all know..." No. Only a handful of paranoid catholics believe that. Talking with confidence: Shows he knows his subject. Proof: it happened.
    1
  580. Car is a weapon if you're driving it. Even then it's only a weapon if you drive it at somebody. If you're standing outside it with your hands in the air, please explain how it's a weapon?
    1
  581. @dsndicmsa Worthy Farm is not intensive agriculture.
    1
  582. Answer number 1: you don't. You reduce the rate of population increase. Answer number 2: Bill Gates explains concept : does saving more lives lead to overpopulation ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obRG-2jurz0 Answer number 3: Stage three demographic transition ( or why population increase slows down with better living conditions): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition#Stage_three
    1
  583. Well once you've established that the world isn't flat, you need something else to believe...
    1
  584. That would be too easy. You might actually end up with people taking the time to understand what he's saying.... and that's no good for conspiracists who like to blindly follow each other!
    1
  585. That is definitely the major problem today.... how to restore faith in the media without policing it to a point of total censorship? Hmm... maybe we need to start in school, with better education?!
    1
  586. Quote from a conspiracy theorist: « regardless of what is being written is true or not. I just follow my guts » Nara Perry Yep. It's real. He said that to me during a discussion in the comments section of a video.
    1
  587. It's really simple: comply and you might get asphyxiated by five cops sitting on you. All about fear and panic. If cops aren't capable of walking over to a man they just saw was unarmed (after lifting his shirt), they shouldn't keep their badges. Why wasn't he tasered, at the very least? Ever seen the videos where people DO get shot, even when they comply? Plenty of them out there...
    1
  588. it's me
    1
  589. There's a bit of a difference between a prophet and someone who predicts based on what experts have been saying for years. Prophet: "and the Lord spaketh unto me (trust me peeps, I've got a beard), and said : do what thou wilst, for the end is nigh (2012, to be exact)" Source: very old book with texts lost in the multiple translations over the centuries. Gates: "and the global (sorry, flatists) scientific community said unto me : thou shalt be in deep shit if thou does not do something fast, so I spreadeth the word for so thou shalt be henceforth warned and we can maybe do something about it" Source: 99.99% of experts who have dedicated their lives to research
    1
  590.  @crazydavec3861  yeah but when you stick an "L" in "pandemic" you get PLANdemic..... which is absolute, irrefutable (whatever that means cos I ain't got not futes) proof of dodgyiness!!
    1
  591.  @crazydavec3861  I can't accept any facts coming from you, an obvious paid troll from THEM! You cant hide that clue in your name: CDC... "Centre for Disease Control", or should I say "Crazy Dave C"....... Hmmm! All that stuff about pandas: I looked it up and it's all lies , just google it! Only two scientists in the whole community buy into that panda crap, and both of them are Chinese, so....
    1
  592.  @crazydavec3861  I thought there was something odd about the reply.... hadn't realised you thought I was being serious! You're right though; there are so many crackpot theories out there that anything could happen! I find these two clips very useful for making points on the subject: Snakes have legs ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HXMYm4k6w0 Life of Brian- The shoe is the sign https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ka9mfZbTFbk
    1
  593. I've made my own predictions, after a few conversations here on youtube, and it goes something like this 100% success rate for the moment): My predicted conversation with any conspiracy theorist: Here's what will happen, if we debate a bit: You'll say "Bill Gates wants to kill half the population, he was chucked out of India, Melinda is a man." I'll ask you for your sources, you'll either say "google it" or "do your own research" or "I don't give links anymore," or « follow the money », or "watch the Corbett report" or you'll just carry on spouting random rubbish. Then I'll give you my sources, which clearly show you're wrong, but you'll refuse to read (yes READ, not watch, sorry!), saying it's all just biased reports paid by "Big Pharma". Conveniently for you, everything which doesn't go in your sense is sponsored by Bill Gates, including me and anyone else who disagrees with you. Since "almost all media" is apparently funded by Gates (funny how it includes media from every single country in the world), except what's on youtube (which is ironic because it's mainly thanks to him that we're on youtube in the first place), it's impossible to provide you with any evidence. Yet you will ask repeatedly, saying mine isn't good enough without giving any yourself. You will spout on about how evil he is, with lots of CAPITAL LETTERS (you're probably catholic, so I can understand that anyone who promotes contraception is evil to you, since you haven't evolved from the Dark Ages), and completely ignore anything I say. When I ask if at the very least you use Linux and not Windows, you won't reply. Am I wrong?
    1
  594.  @clarencec5327  So you have nothing then?
    1
  595. Are they? Got stats?
    1
  596.  @geraldgerow6271  Ok yeah I found it thanks. Souns like he's basically saying they put together the biggest ever taskforce to prevent fraud.... which would be the far more logical explanation anyway, wouldn't it? I lean, I don't know much about what's going on with your elections, but clutching at silly phrases like that doesn't give much credibility to the argument, quite frankly.
    1
  597.  @joetrevino1607  Exact words; "we have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics" As you say, he says it slowly and deliberately...which would be completely stupid if your interpretaion was true! Frankly, it's a feeble bit of "evidence". If you've got nothing better than that, my mind is made up!
    1
  598.  @joetrevino1607  Being a bot with a closed mind I won't go into an in depth reply.... ;) but from what I've heard so far there isn't a shred of evidence for all these fraud allegations. Isn't it a regular tactic of Trump to make such accusations, which then get thrown out of court because nothing is backed up? Reply if you wish for the others of course, not for the bots like me...
    1
  599. Complete phrase: "Now the world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 %, but there we see an increase of about 1.3." Why do you guys always leave off the last bit when you quote that phrase? It's the bit that gives the context and most importantly the subject of what can be brought down. Is it through lack of comprehension, or a deliberate attempt to cover up what is really being said because it doesn't fit in with your paranoid beliefs?
    1
  600.  @DaenerysTargaryenTheQueen  No answer then? I thought so...
    1
  601. You should really consider the idea that we live in one world and are one people. Whatever COUNTRIES do, or have done in the past to each other, we're heading towards a global community nowadays, with "races" mixing and fusioning in a great happy melting pot! That's the real world.
    1
  602.  @Jay-kx5cb  I get where you're coming from, but I think there's a point when you just need to move on. For example, Some people are always wanting the catholic church to apologise for the inquisition, the crusades, pedophilia etc etc. Whilst these things undoubtedly happened, it's history (well, except for the pedophilia!), so can we expect a modern day catholic to feel the slightest guilt about witch trials? I'm atheist by the way. You mention "your people". Who are your people? You said you're not white... but that doesn't tell me much. What is white anyway? Maybe Norwegians are whiter than Spanish, Scottish whiter than English even... it makes no sense in the modern world. I know racism exists still today, but would probably disappear a lot faster if we all just moved on.
    1
  603. Firemen warn about fires. They even run simulations (training exercises). Some might be Satanists, but I doubt it. They're probably just doing their job. Bill Gates warned about viruses. He even ran a simulation. Many people didn't listen. They're stupid.
    1
  604. Guess what: those are the ones he gets his information from.
    1
  605. 0 arguments, 7 meufs?
    1
  606. Of course it's not coincidence. The weather forecast isn't coincidence either. Same thing: collecting, then interpreting data and extrapolating from it to predict.
    1
  607. Why, what happened?
    1
  608. T'as un lien vers des statistiques qui montrent ça?
    1
  609. @UCgk7yvAf94PL8HX2JuIy5Aw Rien pour confirmer tes propos donc? J'ai posé une simple question, tu me réponds avec insultes. Bravo. Ça donne vraiment du poids à tes arguments. Si on veut parler des blancs et noirs, combien de noirs enferment leurs propres filles pendant des années dans une cave et les forcent à avoir des bébés, comme cet homme en Autriche? Combien de tueurs en série sont noir? Combien de tueurs en masse? Quand t'auras des réponses, n’hésite pas à venir m'éclairer. Tiens, lis ça: https://www.amnesty.ch/fr/pays/europe-asie-centrale/danemark/docs/2019/culture-du-viol-et-impunite
    1
  610.  @MaxMax-ky9ez  Puisque t'as la flemme de regarder; Danemark est dans les cas contraire de ce que tu dis; ils sont parmi les plus hauts en termes d'agression sexuelle... alors je ne vois pas en quoi c'est débile de questionner tes affirmations, vu que celui là est faux.
    1
  611.  @MaxMax-ky9ez  Toujours besoin d'insultes, je vois. Nous n'avons pas les mêmes sources pour les statistiques, il me semble; je ne vois pas la même chose que toi: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/rape-statistics-by-country Même si on prends tous les graphiques dans ton deuxième lien, on n'obtient pas une distinction noir-blanc..... sauf si tu trouves les Russes noir, de manière générale? Trouves -toi autre choses; corrélations géographiques il y en a...mais couleur ? C'est pas la même chose.
    1
  612. You sound like you need to go back to school mate. CO2 goes up because of hot air? Wow........just wow! I'm speechless. Is that why trees grow tall, to reach the CO2?!!
    1
  613. That sentence doesn't actually mean anything...
    1
  614.  @spacedinosaur8733  Nice quote! Not sure if it's true though....
    1
  615. Cut a deal with them: ok, you can stand five feet apart!
    1
  616. Actually, speaking as a keyboard warrior, you have no right to say the person is not a real comic. Bill Burr knows who it is, knows their work, and says (with the backup of his years of experience), that the person is a real comic. Who should I be most inclined to believe? Him... or you? Who exactly are you, by the way?
    1
  617. I don't see why you're linking ID2020 to this? It's just a programme for giving people ID papers. Like we've all got (developed world) already.
    1
  618.  @jimmyswaggart1189  Snakes have legs ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HXMYm4k6w0
    1
  619.  @jimmyswaggart1189  you might appreciate this too: Life of Brian- The shoe is the sign https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ka9mfZbTFbk But it all boils down to this: Louis CK – Everything is amazing and nobody is happy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdFB7q89_3U
    1
  620. Mainly.... but not entirely.
    1
  621. Microship= very small boat. Don't be take very small boat, people! (Not boat people- that's another thing entirely).
    1
  622. And there was silly me thinking we were coming OUT of an Ice Age!
    1
  623.  @jodiescott01  Or maybe the drugs were working if you went through three and a half years of therapy... As a controlled experiment, you'd have to go through the same illness, without any "classic" medication and see the results after the same amount of time. Of course though, that's not possible and I don't know what you had anyway. I'm no expert, I'm out.
    1
  624. Tout l'équipe a beaucoup a apprendre...
    1
  625. Nations should indeed do that.... but they don't. They're too corrupt and bent on spending on police and military. Organisations are what? NGOs, I suppose you mean? Who are they funded by? Private individuals. I don't think people should be allowed to get as rich as him, but I'm glad he's deciding by himself to put back some of that money into good things. He's even said he should be taxed more. He believes the rich aren't taxed enough, but if the government won't listen, all he can do is give his money away by setting up a foundation and funding projects. Why is he interested in healthcare? Maybe he just wants more money and power (to do what? He has more money than he could ever spend)... or maybe he's just older, more aware of his own mortality and therefore that of others. Maybe age, marriage and children have given him more empathy? The world most definitely is absurd though!
    1
  626.  @Samo7900  I thought international finance was subservient to them...
    1
  627. You should read more on the subject; you'd see that those rumours were wrong... What doctors, what scientific journal?
    1
  628. That's a very very stupid thing to say.
    1
  629. He prefers talking to kids without prepared arguments; easier for him to win.
    1
  630.  @LexLutha  Yeah sure. I'm not denying that. What I'm hinting at is that Crowder seems very knowledgeable and all that, but we don't see him much in debates with experts. It's more a point about Crowder than the principle of making people look stupid with street interviews. There's a whole level of difference though between the people shown here and those that discuss with Crowder on campus, you've got to admit that. Of course, it's for humour, so they've obviously selected the worst cases, but they sure are bad!!
    1
  631.  @LexLutha  Thanks. What do you make of him?
    1
  632. How come these type of videos always have to repeat over and over again the really incredibly damning bit (in this case, Melinda smiling)? Is it because they're trying to appeal to a public too stupid to understand the first time?
    1
  633. The paradox of America: all lives matter..... until you steal something in my shop, and then you get shot. The second paradox of America: land of the free..... but with the highest percentage of the population in the world incarcerated.
    1
  634.  @MarcassCarcass  What total bollocks.
    1
  635.  @TheAshCooper  You could always try football hooliganism!
    1
  636. Timothy Kieper No he's not, no he doesn't say that, and yes it is. Apart from that, you're right.
    1
  637. Watch to the end of the equation at least, even if you can't be bothered to watch the rest.
    1
  638. I see it all clearly now! Thanx for woking me up, man! I always knew deep down (even before birth) that Bile Hellgates was the Antichrist... I just was missing the link with the hospitals... but now you've explained it. Darn, they nearly had me with all those entrances!
    1
  639. I hope the journalist's life isn't as miserable as his face makes it seem...
    1
  640.  @fpsFAMOUS  "he's been banned from India and Africa already" Really? Can you explain this then? https://web.archive.org/web/20200502090716/https://pib.gov.in/newsite/mbErel.aspx?relid=158277
    1
  641. Not really; the way it was phrased implied "apart from academic/professional level". However, I agree with him: a teacher with kids is for me better qualified for the job then someone with maybe higher education level but no kids or siblings.
    1
  642.  @leloreelise8496  Exactement. Tout comme le comportement "primaire" de vouloir faire des enfants. Tout ça a été étudié scientifiquement depuis bel lurette, et ça continue.
    1
  643. The kid playing the weed smoker is actually quite a good actor I thought...
    1
  644. If you actually quoted him properly, you'd notice the logic. This might help: Stage three demographic transition ( or why population increase slows down with better living conditions): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition#Stage_three
    1
  645. Yep. Don't need armed police most of the time. If you don't let half the population have guns, there's less danger.
    1
  646.  @somebloke7056  No need. In Britain they just whistle and say "stop in the name of the law".... and the thieves stop running and say "blimey, you got me ... it's a fair cop guv" Works every time. That's our British discipline for you. No need to shoot the place up.
    1
  647.  @somebloke7056  If you're a prankster you should have a minimum of understanding of how humour works. If you don't get it, it doesn't make me stupid, does it now? ;)
    1
  648.  @izbo1945  Are you serious? This is not a subject to be joking about.
    1
  649.  Maria Salinas  "a cleavage isn’t automatically sexualizing yourself" Really?
    1
  650.  Maria Salinas  The same thing that men have to complain about?
    1
  651.  Maria Salinas  I see another comment has come up, but been deleted again...
    1
  652.  Maria Salinas  ""joe public youre talking about boobs and everything being sexual..boy..half the population? Ask any woman..boy, I’m a woman..we women know why we show " You're not reading what I say: Even if it isn't sexual, it's still "showing off bits". I maintain that boobs do have an interest to men, and some women, and to the rest of women for other reasons. That's why I said more than half of the population. Unfortunately, the most interesting bit of your reply was cut off.... so why do women like to show?
    1
  653.  Maria Salinas  So why exactly do you wear such things? Please don't just say "because it looks nice" or "because I like it": try to look deeper than that. Also, if you're aware of the reaction you'll get, you can't just pretend it's not the case. I know that if I show up to work with my shirt unbuttoned to show off my hairy chest, I'll get looked at and people will react differently to if I had a fully buttoned shirt. Like I said further up, it's not even necessarily sexual... just different, so provokes reaction. Why would I unbutton my shirt? At the collar for comfort, sure. Further than that is not for comfort, it's going in a different direction: there's a message, whether it be consciously or not. Maybe standing, or power, in some cases: "I'm the boss, so I don't wear a tie and I'm very relaxed and confident", for example. It's a message to others.
    1
  654.  Maria Salinas  Don't expect rapid replies from me I've got a slow connection!
    1
  655.  Maria Salinas  "men shouldn’t sexualize every breath we take so much...that is what we women hte" Maybe women should understand how men function.... and stop sexualising themselves so much to play that game constantly. If I go through my facebook or Instagram contacts, many more of the women put profile photos of themselves (men often have other things than themselves as a profile pic, but let's not generalise too much...!), and they use "flattering" angles to put themselves in the best light (you know; angling up the head so the chin points up and there's no double-chin, taking from the side to give best profile etc). All about looks. Most men couldn't be bothered. This should tell you something about how we function, the two sexes. I could go over the top and say why do you have to dress so provocatively all the time? Ffs, even in sport you have to wear incredibly figure hugging stuff; can't you just wear a tracksuit like us, instead of showing your cameltoe in yoga pants, seriously? Only joking there.... but only half joking! Maybe the difference is that in Western society, men basically say "dress how you like, we'll just deal with it; be yourselves." Women basically say "you must change to fit our concept of how you should be". Stop trying to change others and learn to accept them as they are and work with that.
    1
  656.  Maria Salinas  You're doing it again: giving me no actual answer. I ask again, why do you dress in certain ways? If it's not for men (which I never said it was specifically) but for you, then why exactly? What is so important for you to show cleavage? It's not for men, not for other women, it's just for you... but what exactly? So you can see your own breasts and say "oh I'm so happy with these"? I thought I'd been clear about what is provocative or not... but let me try to be clearer. Very very tight fitting clothes I call provocative because they can even go as far as outlining your sexual organs. Provocative is showing parts of the anatomy that aren't exposed in "normal" clothes (read shirt, tee-shirt, trousers, skirt whatever) which just serve a function. You ask me why you have to wear provocative.... and I reply that's precisely my point: you don't have to, so why do you? Again, please don't just say "because I want to": that's not an answer.
    1
  657.  Maria Salinas  Let me give you an example: If I wear my favourite "f*ck da police" tee-shirt, I do it because I like the soft cotton it's made of, I like the way it hangs on me, I like the colour... I think it makes me look "cool" (which in other words means attractive to women, or at least those women that interest me, and cool, impressive, hardcore whatever to other men. That's the message I'm carrying on me. BUT!! I must be aware that any policeman I pass will react accordingly, whether I want them to or not. So, do I dream of an ideal world where I can wear whatever statement I like on my shirt with no consequences, or do I just take into consideration that it's ok to wear that shirt out with friends, but not ok to wear it for a lecture at the local police convention? Please note: this is not an apology for rape: I'm absolutely not saying that the girl in the short skirt "asked for it". Big difference between rape and being looked at. The short skirt definitely is an invitation to look at your legs though. You cannot honestly tell me that a mini skirt is more comfortable and practical to wear than a long flowing skirt: you have to pay attention when you sit down, cross legs etc... so if you wear it it's for a reason. "To feel good", yeah... but what does "feeling good" mean?
    1
  658.  Maria Salinas  Crossed messages... but do you get how I explain for the t-shirt, but you don't? I give a list of potential reasons (like for the unbuttoned shirt), but all you say is ' "because I like it". Why, why do you like it?? What sensations does it give you? Power, prestige, feeling like you're loved by the human race? I'm also saying get real, and stop ignoring half the population when you dress.
    1
  659.  Maria Salinas  Now, can you give me one valid reason for showing cleavage? I can actually name one valid reason, which isn't showing off or provocation, which you haven't mentioned, so let's see if you've got any kind of answer other than "because."
    1
  660.  Maria Salinas  "it fits me and my fashion and how I am" tells me absolutely nothing. Fashion is at least partly about fitting in with your peers, or making a statement of individuality, for example. So if it's fitting in, it's about feeling comfortable in your surroundings and reassured that you're not attracting undue attention by your difference. It can also be seeking attention from others (sexual or not) because you feel a little insecure... or because you've got something to say (Lady Gaga in meat costume for example. Was it her? Can't remember... whatever).
    1
  661.  Maria Salinas  "joe public „cant you just wear a tracksuit like us instead of showing your cameltoe“ boy we don’t fucking do it for you!!! What cant you understand?? I don’t fucking wear " Another deleted comment... but the question remains (unless you answered it in the cut off bit). Why the tight leggings and not a tracksuit? Maybe more comfortable? So why is it less common for men to wear such things? That sort of shows a difference, no? Wear a tracksuit and you won't be worrying about whether to wear a thong to not have a line going across your buttocks... which is of course entirely for your benefit and not for those who see you from behind.... :)
    1
  662.  Maria Salinas  Maybe it's a question of environment... I live in the countryside, where most of my female friends wear little or no makeup, dress in actual comfortable practical clothes, and know full well why women dress in certain clothes. They openly admit it in front of men because they don't feel threatened in any way. They know a little how men think, and we know how they think too. Everyone is fine with that. There's no denial. Maybe it's all more easy-going because we know where we stand with each other and there's way less inappropriate hassling of women than in cities? Come here complaining that some guy oggled your cleavage and you'll get laughed at.
    1
  663.  Maria Salinas  "joe public i didn’t say women like to show did I?? " You didn't, but yes, women do like to show. Difficult to deny that... and it's ok; I have no problem with that.
    1
  664.  Maria Salinas  "joe public its like asking a goth why they dress like that..its because they like it..its them being themselves..i show cleavage because I like it..goths dress like that because they like it..whats so hard for you to understand??" I'll tell you why Goths dress like that. They're following a fashion to fit in with a crowd basically, because they feel more comfortable with their peers, feeling a certain recognition. The clothes are a form of badge, saying "I like a certain type of music, and beyond that a certain lifestyle". The ample cleavage in amny Goth women's costumes is related directly to the gothic period dress which is recreated today. That's how aristocratic women (and others) dressed at that time in history, and it's that period that Goths like aesthetically. They may also simply be imitating their favourite artists because imitation is a form of appreciation. I may have left things out, but basically that's a reply. "Because I want to" is not a valid reply. See the difference?
    1
  665.  Maria Salinas  For the skirt, it's obviously not solely an invitation, nor even necessarily primarily an invitation..... but it's a factor. Why are you wearing that short skirt?
    1
  666.  Maria Salinas  "joe public i am not walking with leggings wanting to be provocative..yet you think like that..see the problem?" You may not want to be provocative, but you should be conscious that you're not alone in the world and it may be seen as being provocative. If I walk down the street naked, I may not want to be provocative..... but I'm aware that I am. Tight fitting clothing, or with revealing bits has the same effect; it creates an illusion of a naked body or shows parts of it.
    1
  667.  Maria Salinas  Oh and, reading back through the comments, I wonder how you know that movie characters are oversexualised if you don't consider that a tight fitting catsuit showing ample cleavage is sexualising? Maybe they dress like that "because they want to"?
    1
  668.  Maria Salinas  "joe public baby thats how society puts it..as „sexualized“..is it really tho? Nah" Is that all you've got, darling? I don't really get you there...
    1
  669.  Maria Salinas You've got a real problem with your comments vanishing. I got: ""joe public what?? How not?? Is all I got? Isn’t it the truth tho? Even you say it..our naked bodies aren’t necessarily sexual at all..society sexualized many " So I don't know if you elaborated on that or not...but whatever. Society is made up of women and men as far as I know. Sexualisation comes a lot from clothes, and how they are worn (or not!), but it's also something that can have different forms. A man can be sexualised by over-exaggerating his virility, for example (basically, being a super-hero in this case), which is something many if not most women find attractive (or sexy). If women are more attracted by a man's actions than his looks, that's still partly sexual. It doesn't necessarily generate arousal, but it's part of sexualisation.It's just that it's not entirely the same sexualisation for men as for women.
    1
  670.  Maria Salinas   "joe public i think you know what kind of sexualization I am talking about and its mostly the visual one..the one with the looks and clothes and such.." Yeah......and?
    1
  671.  Maria Salinas  I've given you my conclusions, you've not answered my questions (unless the replies were deleted).
    1
  672.  Maria Salinas  I'm not going to recopy them for you. It's all written here, for f**ks sake!
    1
  673.  @markwhitaker574  If you consider it a waste that's your problem. It interested you enough to read it....
    1
  674.  @markwhitaker574  Aren't you lucky!
    1
  675.  @markwhitaker574  If it bothers you just right click on it and deactivate the notifications.
    1
  676.  Maria Salinas  I'm not going to recopy them for you. It's all written here, for f**ks sake.... as I've already said. Here's a helping hand: the bits with a question mark at the end are generally questions.
    1
  677.  Maria Salinas  Nope. Nothing deleted. I can see it all. Try harder.
    1
  678.  Maria Salinas  Stop trolling.
    1
  679.  Maria Salinas  There's no hope for you, if you're not even capable of noticing that I've already told you what constitutes a reply, I've already told you that you didn't answer my questions, already explained that "because I want to" means nothing, but I can drive it in further by saying it's the kind of answer I'd expect from a five year old. I've told you about your deleted comments, copied the bits I could see in my notifications, mentioned that maybe you replied but it was deleted. But all that you can see for yourself if you look back through the comments that are there.Have fun.
    1
  680.  @RichieNicksGaming  I think he meant "you're welcome".
    1
  681.  @destinywilson342  David Icke may have one or two interesting ideas.... but don't forget he believes in alien lizard men. He's really not a reference.
    1
  682. He's talking about the EXCESS CO2 from industry. Does that make it easier for you to understand now?
    1
  683.  @fleurlasser2458  Yeah, it would be seen as him exercising male dominance
    1
  684.  @Jana-fs2qf  You don't hold doors open for men though? Common courtesy is not sexist.
    1
  685.  @tw3ntythr337  "Stop commenting your ridiculous, incorrect bullshit." Please follow your own advice, or start using counter-arguments that could convince us that you're right.....
    1
  686. Free speech has a down side, but you have to just deal with it, otherwise it's not free is it?
    1
  687. What? Sorry... oh damn.
    1
  688. What's a "biotch"?
    1
  689. @Camille Comtois Wasn't that what you were expecting here?
    1
  690.  @moneyisntrealnow  Was it supposed to be a secret?
    1
  691. @Camille Comtois They must've all learned to use internet in Bible class...
    1
  692. I think you should have sex before marriage because you don't want to miss out on all those sexy bridesmaids: it'll be too late after. Also, after marriage your wife might get jealous about it.
    1
  693.  @puzzledsnowman3503  and the fact that it takes them 4 months to respond to comments on youtube!
    1
  694. Yeah! Fuck socialism! Every man for himself! Survival of the fittest! Eat the poor! Get rich fast! Squash all competition! Eradicate commies and socialists! But....... Bill Gates is too rich! He must share more with us!
    1
  695. Oh mais je ne crois pas ma chance! Deuxième ce soir; je suis preneur, c'est sure! Ou est-ce que je signe? Quand c'est que je donne mes infos bancaires? Je suis prêt! Heureusement qu'il y a des gens sympa et généreux comme toi dans ce monde sombre dans lequel nous vivons. Vive la solidarité!
    1
  696. what's nugenix? Like the ole genix but more recent?
    1
  697. Maybe because there is nobody called Ted infront of him. Are you getting confused because it's a TED talk? Thhey're talking to Chris. If you people can't even get that bit right, it's no wonder you don't understand any of the concepts they discuss!
    1
  698. No brain , not listening = conspiracy theory
    1
  699.  @JoyneFreedom  No he doesn't. That would be silly. Why can't you listen to the whole equation? How do you explain the last bit?
    1
  700.  @JoyneFreedom  Looks like we didn't see the same video, because in the one I saw (the real one), he says population will continue to increase, so even if you slow down the increase, it'll still go up. He then goes on to say that you don't wat to reduce the services rendered to the people, and therefore also the energy required to do it. Then he gets to the last bit: C, or CO2 production. This one needs to come down close to zero, hence the title of the talk "innovating to zero": innovating because we need new ways of producing energy that don't produce CO2. Now can you tell me his exact words, when he says it's appropriate to bring population down to zero? I don't think you'll be able to quote him on that.
    1
  701.  @JoyneFreedom  Come on, have you listened to the end of the equation yet? How do you explain it?
    1
  702.  @JoyneFreedom  Ah... so in the end he doesn't say he wants to decrease the population. Glad we got that cleared up. He wasn't indirectly saying anything; he was being sufficiently direct. You see, sometimes you just have to read to the end and not just read shock headlines. Now, what makes you say CO2 has little or no effect on climate change?
    1
  703. Well if they're both men how did they have children?
    1
  704.  @SSStruth  Ok, so more questions: if they're both men... what's the problem? In what way does that affect your life or anyone else's? Why does that have any significance at all? Where does that information come from?
    1
  705. So why does he explain that it's the last bit of the equation, C ( CO2 emissions from industry) that needs to be close to zero, not population?
    1
  706. Yeah, first you have to submit a peer-reviewed application form, requesting for permission to ask for consent, then you have to video your demand and send it to the person, wait for a minimum two week legal delay of retraction before eventually, after having received written acceptation of the possibility of hearing your request, with witnesses present, prostrating yourself on the floor (so as not to potentially intimidate the person), saying fifteen "I am not worthys", proffering a whip to the "victim" in case she chooses to flagellate you instead of consenting. If, of course, you've still got a hardon after all that, you really do have some merit and there's a 0.15% chance she might think about it.
    1
  707. I've got a whole lot of your links not working.... I suppose you will say it's strangely convenient for me, but I assure you it's not! Rather frustrating actually!
    1
  708. Don't you know how most debates work? Both sides give their presentation speech, and the discussion comes afterwards.
    1
  709. Stop hating; you'll live a better life. One that your mother might be proud of.
    1
  710. ...or maybe people that understand what he's talking about?
    1
  711.  @josephphillips8031  There's also way more research and unsuppressed articles that say the contrary.
    1
  712. Patience....
    1
  713. No, he's talking about the excess CO2 produced by human activity. Remember, he talks about the population going up from 6.8 to 9 billion. How is that killing us?
    1
  714. Yeah; STOP SHOUTING IT's RUDE!! None of us are blind, ffs!
    1
  715. Christians have never been renowned for their mastery of logic!
    1
  716. Erm... I think you'll find that whether you wear a mask or not the amount of CO2 you produce will stay about the same. You might rebreathe more. As for your phrase about not to every single person using a mask, I have to say no, it isn't clear at all.
    1
  717. Can you explain how a vaccine can change DNA? I'm really curious...
    1
  718. how comes you quote, but insert the word that suits you? That's rather dishonest on your part, isn't it?
    1
  719.  @dfordiligence2398  From the article you cited: "5. Conclusions The polio eradication programme succeeded in drastically reducing the global spread of this disease, which was achieved through the use of immunization with OPV. While commending this enormous effort at eradication, our observation supports the hypothesis that the frequency of pulse polio administration is directly or indirectly related to the incidence of NPAFP. It is hoped that this finding will help continue efforts at optimizing the dose schedule of OPV administration and result in a reduction in NPAFP—which is a feasible hope, as the incidence of wild polio is currently at an all-time low." So basically, they're saying it's great, but could do better. That's life, mate. Is it better to do nothing and let them all get polio while we work on the perfect, 100% effective vaccine? That doesn't exist anywhere. There will always be regrettable side effects. The idea is to reduce them as much as possible. safety of vaccines : https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/134/2/325
    1
  720.  @howtonotbasic1383  That's often what happens... ....and you're welcome!
    1
  721. Yes. The lives of the two billion extra people (mainly in Africa) will be worse if we don't invent new energy sources. of course, it's a general expression, it doesn't mean that the people born after X date will be worse off or anything. It means that because we're polluting (and therefore making people's lives worse in many places), if we carry on producing (industrially) in the same way it will only cause more pollution and therefore more misery.
    1
  722. hein?
    1
  723. learn to spell at least...MrPigGamer.
    1
  724. I must've missed an episode.... was Biden president for 47 years?
    1
  725.  @emiko114  Laisse tomber: c'est que des complotistes-catholiques.... et on sait que les cathos n'ont aucun besoin de preuves pour croire des choses extraordinaires!
    1
  726. I'd be happy just to have fully operational 3G! Still waiting...
    1
  727. Now there's a perfect example of how stupid rumours get blown out of all proportion and even end up being said by MPs! I explained to you already by A+B why you were misquoting Gates, and this MP has done exactly the same thing. By the way, you didn't reply to me on that one: didn't have anything to say, I must assume. Don't you hear her misquoting? I gave you the exact transcription of his words... do you deny it? "Now the world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 %, but there we see an increase of about 1.3." -Bill Gates.
    1
  728.  @mudchair16  I imagine that where you live, population is not a problem? However it certainly is in some countries. It wouldn't be, if people could circulate freely on the planet... but governments won't let them. The population is increasing steadily, up to a probable stable level of 10-11 billion (stable for precisely the reasons discussed already). Could it increase indefinitely? No. There is a limit somewhere, governed by available resources. Even if resources are shared equally, there is still an upper limit.
    1
  729.  @mudchair16  "He could use his influence to alleviate poverty and find ways to fix localized pollution without ruining industry, but he will never do this." Oh... can you explain this then: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqcknE_Ic_g
    1
  730. @Ali Athar Problems with your Xbox? Try booting it: Ronnie Corbett – Blackberry https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAG39jKi0lI
    1
  731. What's scary? Listen to the talk, not the silly comments that misquote him.
    1
  732.  @orogarcia3839  But that's the thing... nobody is talking about depopulation. Where do you get that idea from? Three weeks later: no reply.... so there goes another conspiracy theorist with nothing to base his claims on. As usual, no reply to say "oh sorry; you were right I misheard". Silence speaks louder than words.
    1
  733.    I love that water analogy; I may well borrow it if you don't mind!
    1
  734. Well that was pretty useless.
    1
  735. Oui, effectivement les "illégaux" devraient être accueillis en lieux dignes, libérant les petits hôtels de passe/marchands de sommeil sordide pour des urgences temporaires, comme les SDF qui sont sans maison toute l'année...
    1
  736.  @loufmanjackie5056  Effectivement, en relisant je vois que t'auras du mettre une virgule à la place du point après "gymnases" et une majuscule sur "chercher".Aussi on pourrait disputer le "sont" et le remplacer par "soient", "ils" au lieu de "il", puisqu'ils sont plusieurs...et voila, je crois avoir cherché et trouvé les (multiples, donc "l'erreur" est aussi un erreur!) erreurs. On dit "cherchez l'erreur", non?
    1
  737.  @loufmanjackie5056  Merci.C'est vrai. Sinon, un peu plus de clarification de la commentaire du début?
    1
  738.  @loufmanjackie5056  Je prends ça pour un non...
    1
  739.  @AdreamlyfeByMichelle  No; you have to be a billionaire first!
    1
  740.  @AdreamlyfeByMichelle  Ok ....
    1
  741. Got a problem with planned parenthood? Do you think it should be unplanned?
    1
  742. I heard that a giant spaghetti monster is devouring the universe... so it must be true.
    1
  743. wtf are you talking about?
    1
  744. Is that what you think they do in China? You should rethink where you get your information from. Sounds like you've been a propaganda victim.
    1
  745. The term is way older than that. You should look further than Pinterest for your information.
    1
  746.  @RickyAllen  "People have a right to think, and thinking shouldn't be practiced through ignorance." Sorry but I don't understand at all. As for Event 201.... we've known about the risk of pandemics for year. Isn't it normal to organise drills, like firemen do?
    1
  747.  @RickyAllen  Now I understand you even less.... You say you don't want to debate in text... in the youtube comments section! Event 201 does not share the same name as COVID19 or coronavirus... It was using a coronavirus as an example because that was always the most likely one to spring up, in one of its many forms. The issue is indeed drills, because that's what it was. I don't understand why you're being so insulting about all this. The interest of being here is to have a reasonable, adult debate, isn't it? Sorry if I haven't understood some things you said... but your phrases were convoluted, so...
    1
  748.  @RickyAllen  You should check out my post further down: "My predicted conversation with any conspiracy theorist"
    1
  749. No cowbell? I'm out.
    1
  750. Are you using Linux on your computer?
    1
  751.  @Elvisrivers1  No he didn't, listen. He mentions reducing the rate of increase. This is therefore births not happening. This is not genocide. Genocide is killing people that exist.... this is not what is being talked about. Proof: the population is I billion bigger than when he talked about it. Listen at least to the end of the equation.
    1
  752. Someone must've said "do the flying kick Alex!"
    1
  753. You forgot to say "Grasshopper" at the end! Oh and a coin has three sides, but that's just a passing detail....
    1
  754. Actually he means reducing the rate of increase of the population by 10-15%. "Innovating to zero" does indeed refer to the excess carbon emissions from industry.
    1
  755.  @fabianboesch96  When does he say it himself? Don't tell me you fell for that "10-15%" garbage? Didn't you take the trouble to listen to the end of the equation, or did you just believe some random catholic poster on yoube?
    1
  756. Did you actually watch? Obviously not. At least get to the end of the equation.
    1
  757. I thought europeans grew most of Europe's weed... individually, in closets and gardens...
    1
  758.  @mety8174  Naa. I'm English and I live in France, so I've got a pretty good idea of what Europe is thanks.... and I don't get my weed from an Albanian village. Nor does anyone else I've ever met!
    1
  759. L’intérêt d'écrire correctement est d'éviter la confusion: "il on pris quoi" veut dire quoi? "Ils ont"? Les hommes, donc, ou les gens en générale, puisque "ils" est aussi neutre, pas seulement masculin. "Elles ont"? Les femmes (donc féministes on peut supposer)? C'est le plus basique de tout en Français, de pouvoir distinguer entre il et elle. T'es en CP ou quoi?
    1
  760.  @0bambou325  Mais non, pas du tout..... ...bon d'accord.
    1
  761.  @kiyu5486  Également!
    1
  762.  @kiyu5486  qu'est ce qu'elle a, sa vue?
    1
  763.  @kiyu5486  En fait, juste pour info, c'est Margaret Thatcher qui a dit "j’ai rien compris et j’ai pas envie de comprendre". Enfin... elle l'a dit en Anglais, et il y a surement d'autres qui l'ont dit avant et depuis....mais elle l'a dit.
    1
  764. Or maybe there is no other side really?
    1
  765. prefabs.
    1
  766.  @jemand7488  Wouldn't be a Black Sabbath song by any chance? That would explain the bat eating bit!
    1
  767. Sounds like a pretty nasty viewpoint to me.However, she did make one interesting point: will all these people still be into equality when they're earning twice as much as everyone else?
    1
  768.  @mwafrikahalisi2549  Impregnating the virgin Mary sounds like a good reason to exist.... who needs more than that?!
    1
  769.  @galinettegalinette1367  l’insécurité n'est pas un sentiment mais une réalité? tu n'as pas vécu au Moyen Age alors?
    1
  770.  @galinettegalinette1367  L’insécurité est un truc avec lequel ils nous tabassent constamment, alors qu'on n'a jamais été autant en sécurité.
    1
  771.  @JackMagedi  Je ne suis pas si certain: le chemin (je ne sais pas lequel), sera sûrement du longueur adapté (à quoi je ne sais pas), mais on ne va pas passer par 4 chemins pour y arriver, si encore arrivé il y a. En tout cas, il ne faut pas compter ses œufs avant d'avoir un panier.
    1
  772.  @JackMagedi  Si tu ne comprends pas c'est certainement à cause de l'impossibilité de pouvoir certifer sans l'ombre d'une doute l'exactitude de ces dits. L'ouverture (tu ne spécifie pas si l'ouverture est large ou serré) de mes phrases n'est que reflet de la vue de mes points (sur les "i"), n’entraînant ni l'un ni l'autre des réponses adéquates. Enfin, sans avoir vu, ni entendu, on ne peut que supposer (et on ne va pas se gêner), et extrapoler à partir des statistiques fourni par ceux qui fournissent. Tout ça dans quel but, ou autre magasin? Je dois évidemment conclure que effectivement, oui; mais sans être d'accord.
    1
  773.  Roger Baker  Enlighten us.
    1
  774. Or the saddest...
    1
  775. He's talking about the excess of CO2 produced by industry. As you say, big companies use a lot of resources, pollute a lot and use a lot of fossil fuel. He suggests that if we use "clean" energy sources, we can continue to supply what people want (the consumers) without such a negative impact on the environment. Couple that with educating people to settle for less (we don't all need to drive 4x4's with climatisation), and we end up with a better world for everyone. Doesn't that sound reasonable?
    1
  776. So it was better in the good old days was it?
    1
  777.  @SAN-yb6yz  Wake up Do your own research Follow the money.... funny how these phrases pop up so often... almost as if "sheeple" were blindly copying them...
    1
  778.  @JackHaveman52  I agree. tell me, has Trump accepted his defeat yet by the way?
    1
  779.  @JackHaveman52  " the right respects the Constitution, the law and the Democratic process. They are adult enough to accept a setback and move on" is what you said.... so I'm asking when do you consider that in this case (the election) it will be time to behave like an adult and move on?
    1
  780.  @JackHaveman52  I think that when stuff is investigated and chucked out of court, like all the other complaints up til now, then it sounds like a case at the very best of "the boy who cried wolf", and at worst simply being bad losers. Even if fraud is found to have occurred in those 40,000 cases it doesn't swing the election. The opposition could maybe bring their own cases to court too: after all, if the democrats did it, what was stopping the republicans from doing it too?
    1
  781.  @JackHaveman52  What are you talking about? Have you never heard the story of the boy who cried wolf? Did you not understand anything I said? Why would you think I'd suggest the courts would ignore evidence? There has to be some evidence.... and what happened with all those other cases up til now? I'm still waiting for a reply.
    1
  782.  @JackHaveman52  Sure. Let them investigate. We shall see... if it turns out to be all bullshit though, like the complaints that aren't pending, that have all been thrown out for lack of evidence, don't say I didn't tell you.
    1
  783.  @JackHaveman52  Did you not read? I said go investigate, and we'll see. I won't say it's bullshit before the court. They decide, not me. I just mentioned that up til now absolutely no fraud has been proved, and if I remember hearing rightly, in one state where there was a recount Biden got about 70 more votes! I'm just using stats to predict the outcome.... which is perfectly normal. We do it every day for the weather forecast.
    1
  784. For the anti-fertility agent I can find no actual evidence of it, just hearsay stuff. Funny how a lot of these things come from Catholic organisations.Even most of those complotist youtube videos are from religious posters. I'm seeing a pattern here. The same goes however for it being refuted: nothing really worth posting as a link. I must say that on this one I was a bit dissapointed by snopes, who usually put a good list of links to back up their articles. This one only had two proper links, the rest just being news stories.
    1
  785. Overall good links . A shame though that after a fairly lengthy debate you didn't reply any of this directly to me. Never mind. It's a great step from your initial "wake up sheeple" stuff, which in my opinion does more harm than good. At least here there's stuff to get your teeth into. You should check up on those links I said though- there's a whole bunch that don't work. Maybe it's just me, because I'm on Linux and not Windows!
    1
  786. "I really don't care, do u?" I really can't work out if it's totally offensive in every way.... or total genius!
    1
  787.  @asgarlata7284  That's why it's an average distance.
    1
  788. THEY knew that..... do you really think it was a coincidence?!
    1
  789. Really? How much carbon do wind turbines put out? Solar panels? I see no chimneys on either of these...
    1
  790.  @donpoulos  Sorry but what has that got to do with it? We're talking CO2 emissions, not calories or joules... His equation refers to emissions, so the importance is not what's consumed in terms of source, but what's put out in producing the energy.
    1
  791.  @donpoulos  Yeah, there's a construction cost (in terms of energy)... but not a continual cost. Once built, you're using sun or wind which will not generate CO2. Any form of energy production will create some CO2 as long as other energies are used in their construction, but it's negligible compared to constantly burning fossil fuel.
    1
  792.  @donpoulos  People like me? That try to have conversations on youtube to debate interesting issues?
    1
  793.  @donpoulos  "Mr I know everything"? Man, we've exchanged two comments about physics, and you're already into insults? Are you really that lacking in argument? Or maybe, if you're trying to make a point that I'm not understanding, you didn't explain yourself clearly enough?
    1
  794.  @donpoulos  Tahnks for admitting. Three weeks later: and another one who actually has no argument lapses into silence! Shame; it could've been an interesting debate.
    1
  795. It was Jabba the Hut that did it for me.... I'm still in therapy today!
    1
  796. Well, they are different. I mean, they use chopsticks, so....
    1
  797. Ever heard of panic reactions? Maybe you've never been in a situation where you panic and react badly? Imagine being attacked by a swarm of bees, for example. Nearly everyone would flail their arms about and run in circles, whereas you should just keep still, and they'll stop attacking. How many people would actually do that?? Panic reactions do not justify killing. Were those cops in danger from a fleeing car?
    1
  798. 1%: just amazed at the stupidity of the human race... or at least some of it!
    1
  799.  @GoogleUser-xc2gz  Nah.... completely wrong. They get the data from any device you may be using; telephone, computer, podometre, whatever... but in no way anything in your blood or implanted in you. You're getting mixed up with the idea of quantum dot tattoos, which are just a glorified fluorescent marker that could be injected with vaccines and subsequently detected, to see if you've had the vaccine... but that's pretty much the same as the BCG jab we had that left a mark on the arm.
    1
  800.  @GoogleUser-xc2gz  By the way, your video is absolute rubbish: Dr Carrie Madej is an osteopathic physician, not a virologist or genetician or anything close to the topic in question, claiming that because we can genetically modify fruit and vegetables, a vaccine could do the same thing. That's a bit like an expert historian affirming that because we can use CGI in films, if you watch one your DNA will change.
    1
  801.  @darengauthier522  Rhetorical question? So you don't even want to hear answers.... bravo.
    1
  802.  @nykedradarden2901  What about it?
    1
  803.  @smaudia6003  JPP?
    1
  804.  @akloppthebest3175  On n'est pas à 1% près.....mais pour vérifier, j'ai recherché sur Google. Tous les sites sur le premier page indiquent 78%. J'ai tapé "air composition percent". Alors non, pas 79. A moins que..... Tu me donnait 79% comme score pour mes commentaires? Pas très généreux, je trouve. "Peut faire mieux"!
    1
  805. That's just sad! Don't get addicted to this..... There's shark tank too!
    1
  806. What are you talking about? He's only talking about the excess CO2 from human industrial and agricultural activity, not all CO2! That would be silly...
    1
  807. And another one who can't understand maths for ten year olds...
    1
  808. Whales are beaching because of 5G? So you think they're coming to sure to get closer to 5G towers maybe in a frenzy of suicide? Because of boat sonar I could understand....
    1
  809. Yeah...... and? What's the problem? Don't stop listening at 4:32, there's the rest of the sentence and a whole lot more after!
    1
  810.  @bgymn-fn8jy  Yes... and like I said, continue listening. There's a key part from about 6:40 to 7:10. Listen to it, then come back and explain what you understood.
    1
  811. TV channels make money out of fear.
    1
  812. Ian Boyle, if YOU listened a bit further than 4:50, you'd understand.
    1
  813.  @vossmasta  That sounds fair enough that you're against defending people who do research in foreign countries, if indeed it really is to avoid regulation. It all depends on whether there' any evidence to support that, or is it just arrangements like with Africa to fund researchers of the particular countries directly, so as not to be accused of keeping them dependent... As for "why do people defend eugenicists", I'd say what makes you believe he's a eugenicist? I often hear "it's because his father was head of Planned Parenthood". Basically, PP is more about contraception than anything else, isn't it? If contraception is eugenics, then I'm a eugenicist as well! That's not what eugenics is though. People get scared when you talk about population control... but what Gates talks about is voluntary action; better conditions makes people want to have smaller families, with no government intervention to oblige them. This seems fine to me: after all, we can't let population go up forever, so if it ends up regulating itself as we improve living conditions, it's a good thing, no?
    1
  814.  @vossmasta  They should never get that powerful... but that's the fault of the people who let them get there. Most people here that criticise Bill Gates so much don't even use Linux on their computers! They're all here, on youtube, saying how evil and too powerful the guy is, whilst using the tools he sold them! Go figure... If we couls start all over, I'd limit the maimum fortune a person can have. Sadly, that won't happen.
    1
  815.  @vossmasta  By the way, thanks for acknowledging that I'm not too far gone with my point of view; I mostly just get insults! Good to hear a bit of humanity!
    1
  816.  @vossmasta  That's too much!
    1
  817.  @vossmasta  What makes you think that? Maybe there's a SWAT team outside your door right now... ;)
    1
  818. Oui, c'est ça la vraie liberté! On peut dire ça aux patrons; c'est juste qu'en générale on n'ose pas, et alors ils grattent un peu plus...
    1
  819. Le film Bladerunner était basé en 2019.... d'après l'histoire de Philip K. Dick, "Do androids dream of electric sheep?" Les animaux étaient tous des robots; personne ne pouvait se payer des vrais... et les robots humains (replicants ) était impossible à repérer sans méthodes sophistiqués....
    1
  820. De toute façon, à ce niveau là, c'est la cata totale: des lumières en arrière plan des deux visages, des gens qui se baladent derrière, gros plan sur le dos...
    1
  821.  @thefrenchcoon2001  J'avais même pas vu ça: je croyais que c'était mes yeux!
    1
  822. Worried about him infecting people with enlightenment?
    1
  823.  @dashingdevonaire4495  Smarter than those he interviewed? Yes. However, I'm not assuming everyone present at the rally had the same intellectual level. It's humouristic televison, not journalism, so obviously he's selected the best interviews that fit in with his intentions. When I speak of enlightenment, it's not in the biblical sense, just showing these people how hypocritical they are in their arguments and how lacking in knowledge they are.
    1
  824.  @dave_riots  I think his point is that it's all a bit childish this left/right I'm right/you're wrong shit. Even if it's not his point, it doesn't matter, it's mine: haven't you noticed that Republicans have some good ideas, as do Democrats, and there's a whole spectrum of political nuance that could be possible if people weren't so obsessed with the opposition being intrinsically wrong about everything. Conservatives may often be religious nuts, but they're also often the ones who use logic and facts in debates rather than feelings. It's actually the right who find themselves defending free speech against the radical left. Isn't that the world upside down?! When you say to someone to stop being triggered and grow up just after he triggers you by telling you to grow up, you're not being very logical. So the ones are "magaturds" and the others are "libtards", some are Neo-Nazis and some are Antifa, but they're all stuck in the same school playground if they can't grow out of these obsolete divisions and think together instead of name-calling.
    1
  825.  @dave_riots  Yes but it's the systematic calling out, whether it's been thought out or not that I'm talking about. I agree, this divisiveness is tiresome; that's exactly what I said. It is indeed contradictory that some conservatives can be religious but others guided by reason.That's humans; we're contradictory animals. No black, no white. All grey. PS thanks for modifying the "shut up" that began your post...
    1
  826. Pervert.
    1
  827.  @johnrayordas  Yeah but..... what a horrible way to go though...
    1
  828.  @ChrisE-iy7ok  Not as gangsta as dem ducks!
    1
  829.  @ChrisE-iy7ok  Nah; that bear is no match for the ducks....
    1
  830.  @armchairgeneralissimo  Thank you sir for that warning: I shall definitely take the utmost care when approaching "Canada" Geese, if indeed I need to approach them at all! In the immortal words of the Who (world health organisation): We'll be fighting in the streets, Against those fearsome Canada geese.... ..and I forgot the rest.... We won't get fooled again... etc
    1
  831. Never thought I'd find myself saying "well he's singing Anarchy in the UK badly!"
    1
  832.  @JV-zw2yc  Whilst I agree that this conspiracy stuff is total bullsh*t, I think he's talking about the bit in the video where you see unmasked police trying to split up the demo.
    1
  833.  @parabpbpbp  I've already seen it, yes. It lacks source material.
    1
  834.  @parabpbpbp  Ok, ignore everything I just said then..... no worries.
    1
  835. Why only listen up to 4:50?
    1
  836. Hello? I asked a question..... why only listen up to 4:50?
    1
  837.  Jewish Troll  Am I really expected to listen to someone called Jewish Troll, really?!
    1
  838. Yes there is. Tesla is doing it.
    1
  839. Google this, google that.... you can google anything. Do you have anything specific.... like some links, for example? Or do you just randomly google without reading the results of your search? Google "why conspiracy theorists will believe anything".... Google Chuck Norris.
    1
  840.  @bradtays7916  Lazy bastard.
    1
  841. And that's the sort of logic that gets us a long way....
    1
  842. Veggies consume dairy products. Worthy farm is not intensive agriculture. Vegans make up a very small percentage of the festival goers.
    1
  843.  @starseed96  So... still hanging on to that old rumour, started by catholic priests, that vaccines contained sterilising agents. It was debunked years ago. https://africacheck.org/fbcheck/25-years-on-rumour-by-us-anti-contraceptive-organisation-still-damages-tetanus-vaccine-programmes/ Next: sorry but I couldn't sit through that one; with masks and already poor sound quality, I couldn't understand anything much they were saying and gave up quickly. Next: Busia county hasn't yet paid up; shame, but nothing to do with Bill Gates. If those 28 children were all in the same place, maybe there was a problem of a "bad batch", or incorrect administering? Whatever, 28 out of how many? Nobody has ever said vaccines are 100% perfect. It's a question of weighing up the advantages and disadvantages. https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/134/2/325
    1
  844.  @WilfredoAguinada-ft5gn  Yep. When humans unite in adverse conditions..... they put on superman costumes to wheel their bins out in the street!
    1
  845. It's what the Illuminaughty and New Order and Joy Division Freemasons always do: the Superbowl halftime show was already taken, so a TED talk was the next best thing. At least it wasn't TEDx : that would've been embarrassing.
    1
  846.  @brentforbush9237  Right. So prove they're lying.
    1
  847.  @RK-eo8gl  Sigh... do you realise that saying "do your own research" is the most ridiculous reply, used word for word by every single conspiracy theorist? The point is, you make a wild claim, or you accuse someone, it's up to you to bring some evidence. I have looked it up, and of course found nothing, just a rumour with no base whatsoever saying that an anonymous doctor at a symposium without a name at some unknown date heard the family doctor (no name) say so, thus breaking oath. That's a lot of unknown factors. So if you have anything better to contribute, please do share, but don't accuse me of not doing my research on the subject.It's the lazy way out. If you have any actual source, why not give it? I could say "they have, but I won't say how I know". Would you accept that? No. So why should I? Nobody can prove it, so when you don't know, you don't accuse. Simple as that.
    1
  848.  @HooFHearteD77  Coward? Why do you say that?
    1
  849.  @emanm3217  I think what Kingdom of Italy may be saying is that why should we bother with people like you who spout out garbage without backing any of it up, and then complain to us that we don't provide enough detailed sources. You're the one making wild claims, so it's up to you to back them up with something... anything!
    1
  850. I thought women dressed showing cleavage to please themselves, not men? I can't work out if you're a radical feminist or a misogynist! Funny how opposites come full circle, isn't it? Short? Ok....... ankle-length is more "seemly"? I wouldn't go as far as to say that she looks pornified: she's in evening dress, which in the Oxford environment is loaded in tradition. Look how the other women in the room are dressed, and you'll see a very wide variety, but they're definitely "dressed up", as are the men (in their strictly coded and highly restricted manner, as opposed to the large freedom accorded to the women, which for some reason gets completely ignored when blaming everything on the "patriarchy"). If you consider that she's dressed "as a hooker", I think you must have a bit of a problem with women (which sex are you, by the way?), or men, or both. Are you perhaps a Jehovah's Witness, or strict Catholic who always wears turtle-necks? We definitely haven't seen the same types of prostitutes in our respective closest towns !
    1
  851.  @kaderkader4573  That's an oxymoron
    1
  852. Don't worry; they all come out waving flags whenever there's a nice little war on somewhere.
    1
  853. So he deserved to die?
    1
  854.  @andrewmitchell2204  Yeah I got a bit mixed up in the comments; you did specify that he shouldn't have been shot. More than just "unfortunate" though: police reacted badly, despite their training.
    1
  855. That does seem to be his philosophy, but don't forget the golf!* *this all stems from a presidential advisor saying "sir, the situation in the Gulf is not good".... Since then he's played every two days!
    1
  856.  @Len408  Chaque chose qu'on fait est déjà mieux que rien...
    1
  857. I think it's probably because lockdown gave people time to chase up conspiracy theories, thus leading them to this video.
    1
  858. There is an oppressed victim's award: but last year's runner-up claimed the voting was rigged and they had to cancel it.
    1
  859. Well, if you were tested at two week intervals it's no great surprise you were negative the second time around. Maybe because you were no longer infected? Rioting due to a police related incident could be stirred up even more if you try to stop it too forcefully. The idea is to maintain order, so if you pour oil on the flames it's probably a bad idea. If your God is real, you don't need churches to worship him.
    1
  860. So putting up a huge billboard and handing out leaflets or whatever is not "spitting (a) point of view"?
    1
  861. Because he had a chip on his shoulder?
    1
  862. Can you explain why you're plugging your herpes medicine in a Trump topic? On second thoughts...
    1
  863.  @MayaSharky  Tacos or tutus?
    1
  864. So explain to me how you debate if nobody says anything first to talk about?!
    1
  865. Probably just means she didn't have anything to say, otherwise she'd have participated a bit more...
    1
  866. Evil? Tell me, what exactly do you do for humanity?
    1
  867.  @blakemitchell735  Nor does Gates. Where do you get that 15% idea from? Because he talks about the population growth being reduced by 15%? You do realize, don't you, that does not involve killing anybody?
    1
  868. You forgot to add "WAKE UP SHEEPLE!"
    1
  869. The pizza didn't look very appetizing.
    1
  870.  @eeo.e  Are you deliberately being stupid? We're talking about the EXCESS of CO2 created by human activity. I suppose "your research" is better than "my research", conveniently.
    1
  871. Wow, that must've taken a while to find...
    1
  872.  @ramaponzi  Wow, even better!
    1
  873. Non, t'as entièrement raison. Boulot de merde. J'espère que c'est vraiment des amateurs parce que ça peut excuser un peu. Sinon, il faut qu'ils changent de métier!
    1
  874. I was thinking that too! Maybe they have some classification of what constitutes a shopping street.... or maybe it's just bullshitting!
    1
  875. Veux-tu bien m'expliquer comment c'est genocidaire de parler d'une augmentation de population?
    1
  876. If it's a fact can you show me why please? As for COVID19, I agree that we probably need herd immunity.
    1
  877. Sooooo... if Bill Gates wants the population to go down, why is it not happening? Why has he been talking for years about the opposite? When i put 2 and 2 together it makes 4, not 5.
    1
  878. Curable disease kills more children than starvation. https://ourworldindata.org/causes-of-death
    1
  879.  @ugandaknuckles5691  Yeah but I replied to Rocio Lopez... you get notified because it's his thread. At least I think so!
    1
  880.  @scorpioUSA  What is so disrespectful in kneeling for the anthem? I would interpret it as a greater sign of respect...
    1
  881. Yes.... well done..... we already know that we're coming out of an Ice Age. Temperature will rise. It's all about how much and how quickly though...
    1
  882.  @rorthron8619  It's even worse: the virus DID try him..... and didn't want him!
    1
  883.  @thomautill2507  C'est preuve de quoi ça? Une enquête n'est pas une preuve....c'est une enquête!
    1
  884.  @vergean  Des aveux? Sources svp?
    1
  885.  @SAN-yb6yz  How do you account for this: https://pib.gov.in/newsite/mbErel.aspx?relid=158277 Update: this link no longer works, looks like they've archived it. You can still get to the article though by following this: click on the Press Information Bureau link: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetail.aspx?PRID=1568914 Then write in the date on the left: 8 february 2017, then scroll down underneath through all the other press releases of the day until you get to "press note". It's all in alphabetical order, so easy to find. You will then see on the main window the complete press note. Here's an extract from the end: "Some media reports have suggested that all health related collaboration with the Gates Foundation with National Health Mission (NHM) has been stopped. This is inaccurate and misleading. BMGF continues to collaborate and support the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare."
    1
  886.  @MarvFitBikesKicks  You're welcome ;)
    1
  887. @Ire4 o is that what you base your argument on; like father like son? Wouldn't want to be judged by you in court!
    1
  888.  @gifffty  I think he has got it. Follow the conversation.
    1
  889.  @lorenadenhollander3083  I haven't looked much into that yet. What I have so far seen is that ID200 is not linked to vaccines introducing a microchip.
    1
  890.  @SAN-yb6yz  Looks like some politicians only watch youtube videos too... Notice how at 2:30 she makes the same mistake as so many people here, misquoting Gates.
    1
  891.  @SAN-yb6yz  I agree with you that CNN can't be relied on.... where do you get your "facts" from?
    1
  892.  @peacelover5729  If infectious diseases kill so few people in America maybe it's because..... they're all vaccinated? Why new vaccines? Because there's always room for improvement, and diseases that didn't have a vaccine yet.
    1
  893.  @roseannenorman9789  Evidence?
    1
  894.  4 Fake  They're laughing about the algebra joke.
    1
  895.  @peacelover5729  The problem is that you're using data from the USA to negate what applies to developing countries. If there are practically no infant deaths in the USA from curable diseases it's because they're all vaccinated, or enough for the unvaccinated to be protected by their entourage. You need to use world data, not just USA data. So when you look at the world data you get this: More children die from curable or preventable disease than anything else. That's not at all the same result as in America. There are diseases which don't have vaccines yet, such as malaria. That's why they talk about NEW vaccines. https://www.who.int/gho/child_health/mortality/causes/en/ https://ourworldindata.org/what-are-children-dying-from-and-what-can-we-do-about-it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_mortality https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-survival/under-five-mortality/ https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/the-top-10-causes-of-death-for-children-around-the/ Also, he never talks about population reduction, but simply the reduction of the rate of increase. Population will increase, but more slowly. And thus... there is no population reduction agenda.
    1
  896.  @peacelover5729  Sorry I don't understand that last comment at all. Can you rephrase it please?
    1
  897. Erm...... non.
    1
  898. What carriage?
    1
  899.  @spacemonkey1776  On the subject of interpretation, and more specifically, getting the right words in the first place, don't forget what this (brilliant, in my mind) film demonstrated: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP2KDUiBI-E
    1
  900.  @spacemonkey1776  By the way, you never answered how individual mothers terminating pregnancy can be considered genocide?
    1
  901.  @barbied3034  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBbC2krBopw
    1
  902.  kc8nqa  What the f*ck are you talking about and why the capital letters in the wrong places?
    1
  903.  @DragonSlayer-hw8wl  Why would that be then?
    1
  904.  @susimeier891  Oh and it's "well paid", not wellpayed. Also it's sick, and not" sich". The rest doesn't make any sense at all.
    1
  905.  @joaquindelarosa1215  Yep, that's fucked up!
    1
  906.  @justinmudford4629  He's apologized for sterilizing people? I wasn't aware of that; have you got a link to that please?
    1
  907.  @emrrre11  Look on the Gates foundation website; they do other stuff too. Health is part of the reasons for smaller families, which include also religion (moving away from religious dogma and accepting contraception), industrialisation and mechanisation of agriculture, cultural evolution (social status with regards to family size), education..... etc. It's a complex thing but it's made up of all these factors. What foundations such as his can do is also limited by local politics, but it seems to me that if he does too much he's sticking his nose in everywhere, but at the same time you ask why isn't he doing everything!
    1
  908.  @thetoking_6128  I'd know it if you gave me some evidence to back up your claim.
    1
  909.  @DracoRothschild  Oh yeah? You find him respectable? He lost, in case you hadn't noticed...
    1
  910.  @DracoRothschild  Bad loser...
    1
  911.  @lovefunkrockmusic  Don't you understand why that law exists? Vaccines are given to so many people that there will always be some people having bad side effects, even death. No medication, none at all, is 100% sure. So if it's only 99.999% sure, when you give it to billions of people, there could be hundreds of thousands (seems a lot, but not when you're talking billions) of complaints. No company in the world would risk making vaccines. Not worth it. So they're not liable, and take the risk to make it.
    1
  912.  @lovefunkrockmusic  Quantum dots are completely unrelated to any tracking, you do realize that? It's just a marker that shows up if you read it with a device, it doesn't connect you to the cloud in any way. Your current medical record is just as linked to the cloud as quantum dots would be.
    1
  913.  @lovefunkrockmusic  What Gates' father did is not proof of what he does, but yeah.... so? I believe in contraception too.... so do most humans who have left the Stone Age. Certainly anyone who respects the right of women to not be subjected to repeated pregnancies that can eventually kill her... If contraception is population control in your mind than yes, good, I'm glad it's there so the world is not over-run by selfish catholics who believe they have a God-given right to over-populate the world and cause misery and starvation. Male circumcision has nothing to do with this discussion whatsoever, but if you think it's a form of population control you'll have to explain your medical knowledge of the process to explain how it controls population in any way! If you're making errors like that, it sort of explains the rest of your arguments...
    1
  914.  @crappiecommandos9720  " that @joe public guy is a fuckin idiot huh" What have you contributed exactly to the discussion?
    1
  915.  @AmandaWait  You should maybe read a bit of science instead.
    1
  916.  @AmandaWait  I'm not telling you what to do with your own body, where'd you get that idea from? You, as a woman, should do what you like with your body (including abortion if you need one). I don't however believe in God, since no evidence has been given of his existence, so I'll stick with human laws, thank you very much. This is necessary in our modern world, because in the ten commandments there's no mention of car insurance or copyright infringement, to name but a couple of unrelated examples. If we only obeyed "God's laws" then we'd be in quite a predicament today with all these new-fangled things we have. Anyway, do we go with the compassionate God or the "eye for an eye" one? That's two very opposed forms of justice...
    1
  917.  @jessicadaniels5501  Is that supposed to impress me?
    1
  918.  @jessicadaniels5501  Yes of course. That's only part of it though because the majority of birth control is absolutely not abortive. What's abortive about a condom or the pill or a IUD?
    1
  919.  @jessicadaniels5501  You know perfectly well what I meant.
    1
  920.  @jessicadaniels5501  So you agree that at least some of the most widespread forms of contraception, the condom, for example, are not abortive. Where's the bullshit there?
    1
  921.  @jessicadaniels5501  Most widely used is therefore most....
    1
  922.  @name-wo2xg  There's a difference between respecting your right to believe whatever you want (ie: not putting you in prison for it or dragging you through the public streets crying out heretic), and not calling you out for it. We can say your beliefs are unfounded, so as to inform young impressionable minds that could fall for such garbage. This does not prevent you from believing. You can even try to convince us if you wish, just as we may try to convince you. As for the Event 201, it was an exercise, such as those done by firemen, or any disaster relief operations coordination. Thankfully this sort of thing goes on all the time so that you and I can stay in our cozy bubble and think everything happens all by itself, or worse that God is looking after us!
    1
  923.  @dogwalker666  Lack of electronics knowledge... but definitely connected to youtube though. On some Bill GAtes videos I tried asking for a while if they ran their computers on Linux. Never got a reply, strangely enough!
    1
  924.  @dogwalker666  Careful now! Stuff going over their heads must be chemtrails!!
    1
  925.  @dogwalker666  This is me stepping in the middle: Ok he's apologised, shake his hand Lucia, shake his hand. We're all good. Let's spark up a reefer and reminisce about Led Zeppelin. I will anyway, whether you guys join me or not
    1
  926. Only problem (correction: ONE problem) with that idea is the "the government" bit. Hadn't you noticed that there are lots and lots of governments?
    1
  927.  @LordxCurry  Not only man-made, but made by Bill Gates in person, in his garden shed!
    1
  928.  @malcolmhurst8802  Well I'd find hearing that annoying "ding!" very tiring after a while!
    1
  929. I very much doubt it. Many of the festivalgoers are probably not at all concerned about the environment. Get over the idea that it's a vegan/hippy fest; it's totally mainstream. This means it's full of every type of person you'll find anywhere, including middle class conservatives who consider themselves superior. The same ones you'll see at the pub on saturday night, throwing punches and glasses around. Am I making a sweeping generalisation? Yeah.... who isn't here?
    1
  930. T'as pas remarqué qu'ils travaillaient dans les champs, pour mettre ton assiette sur la table? En fait, le chômage peut être très important quand on fait les métiers de saison. Mis apart la pénibilité du travail qui fait que des pauses s'imposent, c'est de nature saisonnière.... il y a des moments forcement sans activité, y compris en plein milieu d'une saison; parfois la pluie par exemple peut arrêter le travail pendant plusieurs jours. Tu n'es pas payé pendant ce temps là. La durée d'une récolte peut varier, les boulots ne s’enchaînent pas forcement. Pendant qu'ils travaillent, ils contribuent directement. N'oublie pas que la salaire net est après tous les contributions... Mème si on est non-imposable à la fin de l'année, on paye des taxes comme tout le monde.
    1
  931. What's evil?
    1
  932. Then again, Tolkien predicted "the two towers"....
    1
  933.  @soundtherapy4082  How about you look it up and give us the link?
    1
  934.  Angus Beef  Nothing like good Christian values to bring a smile to your face on a bright sunny morning...... "Burn the witch!"
    1
  935.  @cielocaribe  with a parting cry of "wake up sheeple!"
    1
  936.  @knightwolf3511  I've got no idea what you're talking about.
    1
  937. Pas mal..... mais est ce que tu connais la ponctuation? Ça aide à rendre les choses lisible!
    1
  938. From what I see, scrolling down.... no, no joking, just lots of very very ignorant people proudly calling everyone else sheeple.
    1
  939. So does that make the weatherman diabolic? Does the met office create hurricanes because they can predict them?
    1
  940.  @eeeaten  "Do YOuR oWn ReSeArcH!"* *Using Microsoft Windows as a base to search Youtube on Google, of course...
    1
  941. Since when do viruses have agendas?
    1
  942. Hmm.... I've been looking at all these American TV chat/late/news show presenters for a while... and I just can't get my head round John Oliver. Just seems so false...lacking completely in any actual personality. Change my mind!
    1
  943.  JSavic  ...and it doesn't mean they are not. So basically, one side claims something without backing it up.Anyone can do that.
    1
  944. Apart from him being a very good host (only talks when he needs to, makes the guest comfortable), the format being conducive to a relaxed atmosphere (everyone on together so less pressure and constant focus on one person), there's also way less censorship, so people can speak more easily and freely. That's speaking of the big talk shows of course; there doesn't seem to be much they can't say on shows like "This Is Not Happening"!
    1
  945. Maybe his wife refused therapy? Maybe she wanted nothing to do with him and that's why he was letting out his frustration in other ways? Why always consider women as the victims? I don't want women dressing sexily in the workplace... but they do (by sexily I mean revealing clothes that put value on parts of the body, such as plunging necklines showing lots of cleavage, skirts slit high on the side etc, which are nothing to do with comfort and all about valorising). I just have to put up with it. I consider it inappropriate and morally and ethically wrong... but it's generalised in society, so I just deal with it. Did he have a reputation for screwing up their careers if they refused him? No. He just walked away...end of story. What women are so pathetically weak minded that they can't handle a question? Ask any man the same thing, and 99.9% would be fine with the question, 80% fine with you actually doing it! So, how comes men can deal with it and not women? It's actually expected of women to be exhibitionists.A cultural thing, I think, for which women are just as responsible as men, if not more so.
    1
  946. So?
    1
  947. Tu vas te plaindre qu'il y a des SDF? Ils doivent faire quoi, rentrer chez eux??? Ils n'ont pas assez d'emmerdes déjà?
    1
  948. Je ne comprends pas ce reportage. Il parle des dangers du proto, mais tout le reportage est sur un jeune qui est mort après "une soirée ou il a consommé un gaz hilarant qui n'était pas le protoxyde d'azote"... de quoi il aprle alors, et pourquoi associer ça avec le protoxyde d'azote?
    1
  949. The very small number of total nutters they mix weed smokers with.
    1
  950. You're a tiny bit obsessed with roads, aren't you?
    1
  951.  @hockeytruth  I think I do. But you seem to think it's bad to be helping children in Africa rather than having nice smooth roads in America..... If there's a problem of tax evasion, hassle your local politician. They're the ones who deal with laws.
    1
  952.  @hockeytruth  Well to be fair he does say the rich should be heavily taxed....
    1
  953. Interesting article, needs more research.... I'll get back on that one.
    1
  954.  @rachelgibson1858  That's a short space of time to learn...whereas the police have training in such matters...or they're supposed to.
    1
  955.  @chingoblings3885  But police are supposed to be trained to deal with it.They choose to put themselves in dangerous situations as part of their job. Not saying they should have to put up with life threatening danger... but they did choose that job knowing full well what can happen. A guy who gets stopped and shouted at with guns pointing at him has received no training, did not volunteer to be put in that situation, does not necessarily have experience in dealing with such a situation.
    1
  956.  @stevecrawford333  So they deserve death? Do drunk drivers deserve the death sentence because they might run into somebody? Just wondering...
    1
  957.  Papa John  De-escalating could've been telling him to get on the floor straight away, rather than hands up, hands down, lift up your shirt, come forward, go back.. During this time, someone could've told him why he was being stopped, someone could've approached (with a taser if necessary) to arrest him... but no, this is America, so let's just stand back, point guns and shout a lot, then shoot!
    1
  958.  Papa John  "JXPAT You’re So naïve, other countries don’t have the freedom to publish videos like this, that’s why you don’t see it as much, but it’s there" So basically, you're saying that other countries are sufficiently ashamed of such behaviour that they censor it? I agree, they do; seen it myself in Morocco when police split up a very peaceful demonstration and then went round all the restaurants in the square making tourists delete their photos. I'm not sure which is worse: censoring such images, or letting it go because it's considered normal and justified?!
    1
  959.  @rachelgibson1858  They're not trained to exterminate! "eliminating a threat" does not mean just eliminating the person... it also means diffusing the situation and saving everyone concerned.
    1
  960.  Papa John  That's precisely what I'm talking about: people with opinions like you. I'm sure basing an opinion of a people on youtube comments is not a very precise science, but I only see Americans making such statements. Only Americans seem to place so little value on human life. You consider that a "drugged out felon" merits no sympathy and deserves to die for being stupid. In much of the rest of the world, we consider that if he's drugged in the first place, it's probably for a reason, which may well be beyond his control. He therefore deserves to be helped. Most felons come from very bad backgrounds, violent, abusive or broken homes, poverty... you name it. If you think being born into such a life is something that's merited than I can't say anything more to you. By saying yourself that he deserved to die, you're confirming exactly what I thought. No need to watch CNN or whatever; I get that straight from the horse's mouth!
    1
  961.  @lavienestpasunlongfleuvetr2559  La vie est bien un long fleuve.... mais ça ressemble à la Gange!
    1
  962.  @llewev  Police are there to protect and serve, right? This includes the criminals. Crime can be simply a bad passage in life, a wrong turn, bad decisions, bad luck, whatever. Commiting a criminal act does not necessarily make you a 100% bad person who deserves to die. What is considered criminal even changes as society evolves. Take prohibition as an example. All those "criminals" have now become respectable bar owners, brewers, delivery men, barmen. All criminals at one time. Same for cannabis today in many states. So what's a criminal? What if there's a situation where the guy goes completely out of control? Well, depends on what out of control means. If they can't get in close to taser him, or he's brandishing a gun... that's maybe uncontrollable. Here, the situation is not out of control, nobody is threatened (except him!), the only person at risk is the poor passenger! He was going to get away? So: blow the tyres out. He wouldn't go far.
    1
  963. Erm.... do you have armadillos? (please reply discretely!)
    1
  964.  @jairkerker2821  Oh wellllll..... since I'm here..... (looks from side to side and whispers) can I reserve a Cabassous for next Tuesday? Two hours, please.
    1
  965. My sister used to think exactly the same thing.... ...then I realized I've never had a sister.
    1
  966. Why are you SHOUTING? We're not blind, you know...
    1
  967. All good stuff but.... Why associate this kind of thing with liberals in general? I think we agree that CA is bullshit and that it's only a minority of extremists pushing the idea, but can we also agree that not all liberals think like this, in the same way as not all conservatives are white supremacists. I think it is very loud minorities such as this that get a lot of attention from media, but they're really not representative.
    1
  968. You should've gone to Britain; we'd trade you peanut butter for some marmite! Seriously though, peanut butter and strawberry jam is the best...
    1
  969. How about you give some sources, rather than make empty claims?
    1
  970.  @pawellang205  Thanks for that. Just a bit fed up with trying to have conversations with people who refuse to back up what they say.
    1
  971. Almost as if he was well informed...
    1
  972. What's wrong with the equation?
    1
  973.  @PavlovsBob  Erm..... the last one. Which is also what he says. What's the problem with that?
    1
  974. Oh well he must know then. Remind me who he is again?
    1
  975. I don't know if your story is true or not, but whatever; I imagine that's ho the flat erath theory started, like the crop circles, like the Raelians. Your story particularly made me think of the Raelians: there are currently around 30,000 desciples of a religion invented as a joke for a radio programme by a group of friends. They all stopped except one, who got carried away with it all. .
    1
  976. You what?
    1
  977. "le corps n'est pas une marchandise": et le sport, c'est quoi?
    1
  978. At last! Someone who understands simple English and simple maths! Was beginning to think I was alone!
    1
  979.  @lonckelph  Yeah, this is really much of the problem I think; people just not making the link. I can understand this particularly with foreigners who have to translate his words, and who are maybe unaware of the subtlety of language which means the words "population" and "growth" can be split up within the paragraph. The problem is of course also the large number of video extracts, which don't permit this complete analysis. People prefer to watch that than a half hour lecture. For interesting stats, presented in a refreshing way, I reccomend this guy: The Best stats you’ve ever seen -Hans Rosling https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usdJgEwMinM
    1
  980.  @jamesm1736  Here are some papers on the subject, with extracts of the conclusions for those who couldn't be bothered to read all of it: On polio vaccines in India : Correlation between Non-Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis Rates with Pulse Polio Frequency in India https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121585/pdf/ijerph-15-01755.pdf Brief extract of the conclusions : "5. Conclusions The polio eradication programme succeeded in drastically reducing the global spread of this disease, which was achieved through the use of immunization with OPV. While commending this enormous effort at eradication, our observation supports the hypothesis that the frequency of pulse polio administration is directly or indirectly related to the incidence of NPAFP. It is hoped that this finding will help continue efforts at optimizing the dose schedule of OPV administration and result in a reduction in NPAFP—which is a feasible hope, as the incidence of wild polio is currently at an all-time low." And this one, explaining why the vaccine causes more cases now of polio than the natural strain : Mutant Strains Of Polio Vaccine Now Cause More Paralysis Than Wild Polio https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/06/28/534403083/mutant-strains-of-polio-vaccine-now-cause-more-paralysis-than-wild-polio "That eradication effort has been incredibly successful. In 1988, when the campaign began, there were 350,000 cases of polio around the world each year compared with the six so far this year. Zaffran credits the oral polio vaccine with getting the world incredibly close to wiping out a terrible disease. "Four regions of the world have totally eradicated the disease with the use of the oral polio vaccine," he notes. "Of course we need to recognize that there have been a few cases of children paralyzed because of the vaccine virus, which is regrettable. But, you know, from a public health perspective, the benefits far outweigh the risk." This one, with regards to malaria: First Results of Phase 3 Trial of RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine in African Children https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1102287 "Conclusions The RTS,S/AS01 vaccine provided protection against both clinical and severe malaria in African children. " "A malaria vaccine, deployed in combination with current malaria-control tools, could play an important role in future control and eventual elimination of malaria in Africa."
    1
  981.  @jamesm1736  Hi, just to get back to you on your comment: It's not me who said this is not the place to debate vaccines, it was another poster. The sly comments about youtube videos is because like you, I'm here looking for interesting debate, so it's frustrating to be sent links to videos which are often either just truncated versions of the original (sometimes even consciously edited to mislead), or random twenty year olds making wild suppositions with nothing to back them up, if it's not the very same type of video. This leads to a closed circuit which helps nobody, and gets the debate nowhere. Youtube videos are of course useful for getting interested in a subject, because they lead (notably through the comments section) to other equally interesting topics. The youtube algorithms tend to guide us towards following the same stream of ideas though, which I hate! I use the comments section to give me the opposite viewpoint, and go on from there. I don't pretend to be an expert on any of this, which is why I don't post videos giving "the truth about evil Bill". As for that equation, don't forget he said the population is 6.8 billion and will go up to 9....doesn't sound like reduction of population to me! He continues afterwards by saying that the INCREASE can be slowed. As for getting one of those factors down to zero; it's the last one: CO2, and that's what this talk is all about: finding alternative energy sources. Maybe he's a monster, maybe not. In any case, my computer runs on Linux!
    1
  982. What you "read somewhere" was a collection of rumours, from no verifiable source that say: a doctor (anonymous) told someone (anonymous) that he (or she) went to a convention (no name, no place, no date) and met (someone who claimed to be) the Gates family doctor, who revealed (thus breaking oath of privacy) that their children weren't vaccinated. Does that really sound like convincing information that merits to be spread ? I'll answer for you: no, it sounds like made-up bullshit, doesn't it? Unless of course you're religious, in which case a compilation of hearsay anecdotal evidence is plenty enough to base your entire life upon.
    1
  983. Sigh..... no: listen again. Let me make it easier for you. Here's the exact words he uses: "Now the world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 %, but there we see an increase of about 1.3."
    1
  984. He knew about it sure... he gave a TED talk in 2015 for example. Shame nobody listened. That makes everybody else responsible actually. He warned, they didn't listen. How is he responsible?
    1
  985.  @riyaan1993  What was he supposed to do.... apart from warning people, helping set up a pandemic exercise (Event 201) and funding research....?
    1
  986.  @riyaan1993  The next outbreak? We're not ready -2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Af6b_wyiwI Bill Gates has a warning about deadly epidemics -2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDxb21qIilM Bill Gates: 'What could cause, in a single year, an excess of 10 million deaths?'- 2018 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ToWY_BYb00
    1
  987.  @riyaan1993  You're right of course.. nobody watches these "useless shows".... that's why the 2015 TED talk has 29 million views. The fact that you call that a "useless show" demonstrates that you have no idea what you're talking about, do you? TED talks are watched by a lot of people... the ones that matter, I'd be tempted to say. So you would've listened, would you, if Bill Gates told you to wash your hands via twitter? He's been warning governments...health authorities... and you think he should've done more?! No; let's blame him for everything, it's so much easier. So when people are warned over a period of years, but do not take heed... it's not their fault in any way?
    1
  988. Yeah, you might just get sat on and slowly asphyxiated!
    1
  989. So base? Why interpret so negatively? Sex has always been a subject of comedy, rightly so, and this is a late night show, if I'm not mistaken. Being able to talk openly, with no censorship, on any subject, is what I'd consider a positive evolution.Also, yeah; you clicked on the clip, didn't you?!
    1
  990.  @tw3ntythr337  What's my youtube account got to do with understanding a simple speech?
    1
  991. He said we risked more from bioterrorism than nuclear *war*. In 2015 he mentioned nuclear energy, not nuclear missiles. Don't be lost, he was thinking ahead.
    1
  992. BLA BLA AVENGING GOD (who loves you all) LAST JUDGEMENT BURN IN HELL (but with forgiveness) ALMIGHTY BUT CAN'T EVEN STRING A FEW WORDS TOGETHER CORRECTLY.
    1
  993.  @rasrasettejasper6086  Looks like it's got to you already....
    1
  994. Avez vous des liens vers ces nouvelles recherches?
    1
  995. Source, please.
    1
  996.  @TheBuzz222  "@Popeye Gordon Bill Gates Ted talks: We can reduce the world population by 15% with vaccines." Why put quote marks round something that is not a quote? Isn't that equivalent to.... lying through your teeth? Here's what he said (as you know, with your super-unedited-video): "Now the world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 %, but there we see an increase of about 1.3." That's not at all what you claimed he said, is it? Don't put quote marks round your interpretation of his words, that is not how you use them. I know why you do it though: if you quote properly the entire sentence the real meaning is glaringly obvious. 10-15% refers to the 1.3 increase. Easy.
    1
  997. All the better for tying you to...
    1
  998.  @cubedeveloper9504  On acid we say, not acids.... that'd be completely different and probably way less fun!
    1
  999.  @TruthSeeker-yb2lm  I thought lemmings jumped off cliffs....... jeez, do they get thrown in prison for that nowadays?
    1
  1000. How very odd. Not like interviewers prepare their questions normally, so that interviewees can prepare their replies.
    1
  1001. Are there conservative group gatherings of 200,000 people? What makes you say there's not a large proportion of conservatives at the festival? Do you have statistics on this?
    1
  1002. Why don't you quote the whole paragraph?
    1
  1003.  @katdevona6127  When you make a claim, it's up to you to support it. Where's your links? Sources please, or no valid argument.
    1
  1004.  @ovoj  Good luck to you! I've been trying to explain this for the last few days, but I'm confronted by a brick wall of ignorance. Good to know there are a few sane people out there somewhere though! Next, they'll be telling us the Earth is flat!! ;)
    1
  1005.  @katdevona6127  Please do. It''s precisely because I am researching the subject that I'm asking you. To save us all time, a credible "source" is not a newspaper article (though this can be used to link to sources that they cite), nor some random youtube video, nor a facebook shock photo with a caption. A valid source would be a scientific peer-reviewed study, statistics from sites specialised in statistics, direct statements "from the horse's mouth".... all that kind of thing: not hearsay.
    1
  1006.  @AndrewRulnick  Doesn't matter who snopes are if they cite their sources. All that counts is the sources. If they can be followed up, any bias of the author can be balanced by looking directly at their sources. You say one thing, I check your sources, snopes says another, I check theirs. They always have a list of sources so you can go see for yourself. A useful tool.
    1
  1007.  @katdevona6127  I admit to poking fun a bit...it's just that all these theories I've seen work in the same way: wild allegations on social media, with no sources cited, or just citing each other, with a bunch of believers calling everyone else "sheeple", and generally ending with "wake up people". If you're really looking for the truth, stop inundating the net with such garbage ( not you, personally, Kat, unless you also post such videos). If you want truth, go to the sources. If you want people to "wake up", guide them to the sources, don't just tell them to look it up themselves; they'll risk to get lost in the rubbish.So you're not anti vaxx; I'm not pro-Gates. My computer doesn't even run on Windows, I use linux. It's hard to know what the "truth" is about any subject; there's so many undercurrents, bias, conflict of interest... that's why you have to push as far as possible in the source material to find out who's just blatantly lying.
    1
  1008.  @islammuradov1970  Here are some fun articles on vaccines for you to consider. It might make you see another side to the story. On polio vaccines in India : Correlation between Non-Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis Rates with Pulse Polio Frequency in India https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121585/pdf/ijerph-15-01755.pdf Brief extract of the conclusions : "5. Conclusions The polio eradication programme succeeded in drastically reducing the global spread of this disease, which was achieved through the use of immunization with OPV. While commending this enormous effort at eradication, our observation supports the hypothesis that the frequency of pulse polio administration is directly or indirectly related to the incidence of NPAFP. It is hoped that this finding will help continue efforts at optimizing the dose schedule of OPV administration and result in a reduction in NPAFP—which is a feasible hope, as the incidence of wild polio is currently at an all-time low." And this one, explaining why the vaccine causes more cases now of polio than the natural strain : Mutant Strains Of Polio Vaccine Now Cause More Paralysis Than Wild Polio https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/06/28/534403083/mutant-strains-of-polio-vaccine-now-cause-more-paralysis-than-wild-polio "That eradication effort has been incredibly successful. In 1988, when the campaign began, there were 350,000 cases of polio around the world each year compared with the six so far this year. Zaffran credits the oral polio vaccine with getting the world incredibly close to wiping out a terrible disease. "Four regions of the world have totally eradicated the disease with the use of the oral polio vaccine," he notes. "Of course we need to recognize that there have been a few cases of children paralyzed because of the vaccine virus, which is regrettable. But, you know, from a public health perspective, the benefits far outweigh the risk." This one, with regards to malaria: First Results of Phase 3 Trial of RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine in African Children https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1102287 "Conclusions The RTS,S/AS01 vaccine provided protection against both clinical and severe malaria in African children. " "A malaria vaccine, deployed in combination with current malaria-control tools, could play an important role in future control and eventual elimination of malaria in Africa." Tetanus and fertility in Africa: https://africacheck.org/fbcheck/25-years-on-rumour-by-us-anti-contraceptive-organisation-still-damages-tetanus-vaccine-programmes/ Finally, did the Gates Foundation get chucked out of India? No, it didn't. Do I have proof of that? Yes. From the Indian government. Excuse the convoluted link, but it's the only way I know to see the press release they gave, since it has been archived: click on the Press Information Bureau link: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetail.aspx?PRID=1568914 Then write in the date on the left: 8 february 2017, then scroll down underneath through all the other press releases of the day until you get to "press note". It's all in alphabetical order, so easy to find. You will then see on the main window the complete press note. Here's an extract from the end: "Some media reports have suggested that all health related collaboration with the Gates Foundation with National Health Mission (NHM) has been stopped. This is inaccurate and misleading. BMGF continues to collaborate and support the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare."
    1
  1009.  @ChristinaAllenKnowsYourAStar  Sigh....... You don't lower CO2 with vaccines. That's why there are four parts to the equation. Vaccines, along with contraception, general healthcare, better living conditions etc save lives. Countries with better conditions have smaller families. This slows down the rate of increase of the population (note: it doesn't reduce population, it slows population growth). If you want to reduce CO2, population is not going to make much difference because it's still going up. You need to change the energy sources. That can reduce CO2 emission. The Best stats you’ve ever seen -Hans Rosling: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usdJgEwMinM Stage three demographic transition ( or why population increase slows down with better living conditions): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition#Stage_three Bill Gates explains concept : does saving more lives lead to overpopulation ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obRG-2jurz0
    1
  1010.  @Joleen_DeVore  Any proof of that?
    1
  1011.  @Joleen_DeVore  Who cares who they are, as long as they cite their sources?
    1
  1012.  Alan Byrd  Did India kick him out? Where's the proof? I've got proof to the contrary.... from the Indian government. Here it is (not a very direct link I'm afraid, but it looks like they've archived it, so it's there, but harder to find): click on the Press Information Bureau link: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetail.aspx?PRID=1568914 Then write in the date on the left: 8 february 2017, then scroll down underneath through all the other press releases of the day until you get to "press note". It's all in alphabetical order, so easy to find. You will then see on the main window the complete press note. Here's an extract from the end: "Some media reports have suggested that all health related collaboration with the Gates Foundation with National Health Mission (NHM) has been stopped. This is inaccurate and misleading. BMGF continues to collaborate and support the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare."
    1
  1013.  @anonuniqorn4709  A population going from 6.8 to 9 billion is not depopulation. He does not talk about depopulation. This is not an isolated case. Check on his other speeches: it's population GROWTH that he talks about.
    1
  1014.  @BakedNConfused  Who cares who snopes are, as long as they give sources in their articles. It's only the sources that count.
    1
  1015. Siob sed nibor?
    1
  1016. No, what insanity?
    1
  1017. Not bad at all, but...I don't know..... ...could use some more cowbell.
    1
  1018. literally...
    1
  1019.  @ERICK-cv1zh  Complotiste? Je ne vois pas en quoi je suis complotiste!? Les gouvernements nous mentent en permanence; ça fait parti du boulot d'un politicien (et je dis ça avec seulement un peu d'ironie). Après, question moyens... justement, il faudrait disposer de plus.
    1
  1020.  @ERICK-cv1zh  Et économie dit quoi dans tout ça? Il y a beaucoup d'entreprises et des assos qui coulent à cause de ces mesures. Le monde ultra-connecté d'aujourd'hui fait qu'on s'exposera forcement à des nouveaux virus régulièrement. On ne peut pas tout arrêter chaque fois; il faut que les hôpitaux puissent absorber les malades pour ne pas constamment mettre en quarantaine des populations en parfaite santé. Il manque de l'argent? Taxons les riches, bordel. C'est vraiment pas si compliqué. On le sait depuis bien longtemps. Il n'y a pas d'excuse." Penser collectif et arrêter de jouer en solo", comme on dit. Ça coûtera bien moins de mettre le système de santé en état que d'essayer de sauver l'économie en distribuant des primes et des chômages partielles. Et après on va essayer de dire que c'est la faute des jeunes, qui s'infectent lors des soirées, alors que dans le métro bondé sans air qui circule, qu'ils prennent pour aller au boulot tous les matins et soirs, il n'y a aucune risque?! C'est ça...
    1
  1021.  @ERICK-cv1zh  Et voila, comme d'hab: "ne touchez surtout pas aux riches!" On ira loin si on les laisse prendre petit à petit tout l'argent, comme ils sont en train de faire.Combien de milliardaires en plus en France depuis dix ans? Quand il y a le feu à la maison, effectivement on l’éteint, puis on essaie de connaître la cause pour faire en sorte que ça ne se reproduit plus. .Rappelez-moi déjà que sont les mesures qui étaient prise après la première vague pour améliorer les services de santé??? Ah, oui, je sais; on demande aux soignants de ne pas prendre des congés toute de suite parce qu'il manque des effectifs.
    1
  1022.  @ERICK-cv1zh  Je vous rappelle que l'année dernière à eu lieu Event 201... une exercice pour gérer une pandémie. Les complotistes, eux, disent que ce n'est pas par hasard, que tout est machination du Nouvel Ordre Mondial. Bien... il y en a qui pensent que la Terre est plate aussi. Moi je dis que malgré de tels exercices, malgré le fait que des gens comme Bill Gates disent depuis des années (voir Bill Gates TED talk 2015, par exemple) qu'on risque des pandémies et qu'on n'est pas prêt... on n'est effectivement pas prêt. Après une première vague, on n'est toujours pas prêt.
    1
  1023.  @ERICK-cv1zh  Mais de quoi vous parlez? Je dis qu'il faut les taxer un peu plus, c'est tout. Ils ne me gênent pas non plus les riches.... mais s'ils pompent toute la thune sans contribuer il y a un problème. L'argent est là, il faut juste le prendre.
    1
  1024.  @ERICK-cv1zh  Si vous êtes soignante, vous savez bien qu'il manque des effectifs, du matériel, de la place, des lits. Vous devrez savoir que ça fait bien des années qu'on grignote petit à petit les services de la santé (parmi d'autres). Ce politique là, on le paie maintenant. Je me répète peut être, mais puisque vous ne réagissez pas à mes propos vous n'avez peut être pas compris: Ça coûte sûrement plus cher à la longue de compenser les business qui coulent, que de renforcer les services de santé. On nous dit depuis le début: le confinement, les mesures de distanciation etc sont pour éviter que les hôpitaux soient débordés. Sinon, aucun intérêt. Le virus circule, ne va pas disparaître par magie, et on doit s’immuniser. Je répète aussi que si les gens ne respectent pas les consignes, c'est parce qu'on nous ment sur tout en permanence. J'espère que vous n'allez pas essayer de prétendre que le gouvernement (et les gouvernements précédents) est entièrement honnête avec nous? C'est là, le monde des bisousnours ! Encore je répète, qu'ont ils fait suite à la première vague pour se préparer à la deuxième? Ah oui, ils ont donné des médailles aux soignants (mais que certains) et des bons vacances (mais pas de vacances), alors que depuis des années les soignants disent qu'ils sont débordés, épuisés, dégoûté au point de quitter les hôpitaux presqu'en masse pour travailler dans le privé.
    1
  1025.  @ERICK-cv1zh  Vous ignorez tous que je dis...
    1
  1026. The recent ones are much more interesting.... if somewhat depressing at times. Makes you see just how stupid humanity can get.
    1
  1027. Yeah, he (looks furtively from left to right and whispers) talks to experts...
    1
  1028.  @roosternuget2209  Well they definitely got their "superior advantage"!
    1
  1029. Ok, on peut peut être dire qu'il est obsédé par la technologie.... mais il fait confiance à la nature pourtant: comment marche un vaccin? En introduisant des antigens qui sont ensuite combattu par votre système immunitaire!
    1
  1030.  @KalkiAvatara  Malheureusement dans ce monde tout est business. Les vaccins rapportent moins que des traitements pourtant. Peu de choses qu'on utilise aujourd'hui sont naturelles...c'est pas pour autant qu'ils sont forcement mauvaises. Ça ne pose pas de problèmes de communiquer à travers des ordinateurs, par exemple. Beaucoup de médicaments sont basés sur des plantes, mais on a du synthétiser parce qu'il faut des quantités énormes. La population mondiale est trop grande pour qu'on puisse compter uniquement sur la Nature de fournir tous qu'il nous faut.
    1
  1031. A bit old, but still worth watching to understand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6eORtwwXtE
    1
  1032. "Anyone that engages in porn or prostitution supports rape and pedophilia".... oh really? Nothing I like more than a sweeping statement that considers that self-affirmation is equivalent to evidence.
    1
  1033.  @manawahinekorero9534  I really don't get your logic, sorry. We're talking here about legalizing an industry to take it out of the shadows, to make it more secure for those who participate in it (who will do so whether it' legal or not). Exactly the same as drugs: Policing wasted on stopping weed growers instead of breaking up coke cartels. You keep all sex work illegal, and policing is wasted on picking up prostitutes instead of stopping child trafficking rings. Cases of young boys raping after watching porn? Like those kids that listened to Metallica and went on a killing spree? Please, one bad example should not dictate how a whole population should be restricted. Remember how well prohibition worked in the US? Some people really shouldn't drink, I think we'd all agree... but the rest of us? There are many types of porn out there, some of which is "bad", some of which is harmless, performed by consenting adults. Repression is not the answer to everything, and is probably the answer to nothing.
    1
  1034.  @manawahinekorero9534  Ok you're listening to nothing forget it.
    1
  1035.  @manawahinekorero9534  So what's your suggestion for protecting these women? That's why we're here, that's why we're debating, isn't it? The whole thing is about whether to legalise or not, to protect in at least some small way the women involved. Where do you get the idea that I support in any way rape of children? If you let prostitutes work in a safe environment off the streets than the police can concentrate their resources on the traffickers. What's the problem with that? You can't just invent a world where it doesn't happen, so what are your solutions? I've proposed legalising for closer surveillance and social rights, like in any legal work. I don't get why you assume I care more about conserving porn? I'm just saying get real, it won't go away by itself, so what do we do????
    1
  1036.  @manawahinekorero9534  pathétique
    1
  1037. Yeah...it's ok.... but could use more cowbell.
    1
  1038. Religious nutters are all half-blind. Proof: they have to write in capital letters all the time!
    1
  1039. Theory: Bigfoot exists Conspiracy theory: the Russians created Bigfoot to distract the Americans from their space programme, thus obliging them to get Kubrick to film it all in Area 51 and leave clues on kids jumpers in The Shining, which was in itself a cover-up for a pedophile and tasteless carpet ring.
    1
  1040. Please leave Pete Townsend out of this.
    1
  1041. Je vois beaucoup de commentaires qui expriment la même chose... mais si on les enferme, c'est parce qu'on se considère mieux, plus civilisé, plus juste qu'eux. Est ce que le fait de les détenir dans de tels conditions montre qu'on est mieux? Quoi que ce soit le crime, on se doit de ne pas tomber dans la vengeance, la torture, le comportement sous-humain. Qu'on croire en un dieu ou non, Sinon, comment on peut dire qu'on a raison, et pas eux?
    1
  1042. Hello slave. How does it feel to be controlled by an imaginary man in the sky?
    1
  1043. Not bad... could use more cowbell.
    1
  1044. That doesn't make any sense at all.
    1
  1045. Autrement dit, un débat!
    1
  1046.  @maitoukmaitouk2131  Autrement dit: "il n'y a pas de source"
    1
  1047.  @KalkiAvatara  Encore une phrase sortie de nullpart. Sources?
    1
  1048. Can someone explain to me why Americans think they're living in the greatest country in the world, and also why they're so obsessed with a two-way party system? Basically, you're either a republican... or a goddam democrat commie. Seems a little too over-simplified to me... Oh and don't bother with the "our wonderful constitution" stuff: we've all got one.
    1
  1049.  @chrisprilloisebola  According to conspiracy theorists there should be no unemployment, because everyone else in youtube comments is a paid shill.
    1
  1050.  @chrisprilloisebola I'm still waiting to be paid, personally!
    1
  1051. So what's Elvis now?
    1
  1052. The people in the audience aren't idiots.
    1
  1053.  @MarcassCarcass  So you don't feel up to an intelligent conversation then? Funny that...
    1
  1054.  @MarcassCarcass  I accused you of nothing.
    1
  1055. My predicted conversation with any conspiracy theorist: Here's what will happen, if we debate a bit: You'll say "Bill Gates wants to kill half the population, he was chucked out of India, Melinda is a man." I'll ask you for your sources, you'll either say "google it" or "do your own research" or "I don't give links anymore," or « follow the money », or "watch the Corbett report" or you'll just carry on spouting random rubbish. Then I'll give you my sources, which clearly show you're wrong, but you'll refuse to read (yes READ, not watch, sorry!), saying it's all just biased reports paid by "Big Pharma". Conveniently for you, everything which doesn't go in your sense is sponsored by Bill Gates, including me and anyone else who disagrees with you. Since "almost all media" is apparently funded by Gates (funny how it includes media from every single country in the world), except what's on youtube (which is ironic because it's mainly thanks to him that we're on youtube in the first place), it's impossible to provide you with any evidence. Yet you will ask repeatedly, saying mine isn't good enough without giving any yourself. You will spout on about how evil he is, with lots of CAPITAL LETTERS (you're probably catholic, so I can understand that anyone who promotes contraception is evil to you, since you haven't evolved from the Dark Ages), and completely ignore anything I say. When I ask if at the very least you use Linux and not Windows, you won't reply. Am I wrong?
    1
  1056. Facebook is truth! Hallelujah! Oh...hang on a minute: it's a link to a youtube video...
    1
  1057. J'ai essayé de l'injecteur mais je n'arrive pas.... ça me gonfle!!!
    1
  1058. Whilst your ideas on industry are reasonable, they're not necessarily easy to accomplish. Just "doing" stuff doesn't come with a snap of the fingers. Now, on to Gates! No, you didn't hear right: vaccines don't lower the population. A combination of factors improving living conditions, including vaccination against disease, mean that people end up having smaller families. They do this of their own free will, like we in the western world already have. The only lowering is of the rate of increase of the population before it stabilises. Healthcare does not mean abortions, it means what it says. Hospitals, for example. Contraception is part of it, but contraception is not abortion either. One prevents sperm and egg meeting, the other stops a process already engaged. If you have a problem with the idea of contraception, I cannot argue with you that point, we'll go round in circles.But don't get contraception and abortion mixed up. "No structural electricity in Africa": are you joking here? You do realize that "Africa" is made up of many countries with many stages of development. Ever been to a single African country? If so, you'd notice that it's like anywhere; some places have electricity in every house and some don't. He is concerned by the places that don't. The innovation he's talking about is required in the production of energy, so that everyone can aspire to have the same services, without any reduction of population involved.
    1
  1059. 1: it's population growth, not population. 2: you can check up on how demographics works- Stage three demographic transition ( or why population increase slows down with better living conditions): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition#Stage_three
    1
  1060. The man on the right side is called Bill Gates...
    1
  1061. Suite à la loi de l'année dernière qui empêche les gens de dissimuler le visage... Tout le monde se promène avec une masque (sauf les flics). Et aujourd'hui, on ne se fait pas arrêté si on court (c'est légal et justifie la présence dehors). Alors si vous voyez des flics: mettez vos masques et courez!
    1
  1062.  @K.2.K  The media doesn't need to be out to get Trump: he offers them all the material they need on a platter.
    1
  1063. Not easily, generally speaking!
    1
  1064. You're mixing up completely unrelated topics.
    1
  1065. @JRD I don't get your point mate. You do realise I was responding to the OP, don't you?
    1
  1066. @Austerus Tertius Tutelus Yeah, stay home, watch telly, shut up, wallow in your own filth.
    1
  1067.  @ghosthost2033  There's a mix up there: 10-15% refers to the increase in population (1.3), not to carbon or CO2. There is of course correlation between them, but the numbers cited aren't directly about Carbon.
    1
  1068.  @insanegenius5321  Actually, what he basically said was that CO2 will be reduced insignificantly by a slowed population growth, so you have to bring down another variable, which in this case is CO2 emitted by energy production.
    1
  1069.  @insanegenius5321  "People are dying from covid-19. Thousands! The plan is already in motion my dude." There aren't that many people dying really, so if it was a plan, they picked the wrong virus, especially when you consider that this talk was ten years ago and now we have 1 billion more people on the planet!
    1
  1070.  @insanegenius5321  Ok, so if a vaccine kills you, will it be quick or slow? I ask that because if it's quick, people might notice before the whole world gets vaccinated. People would complain, there'd be revolutions, Bill Gates would get his head cut off and fed to Melinda. So, it had better be slow, because whatever happens, it'll be impossible to distribute the vaccine simultaneously all over the world. Why not just do it in Africa? After all, that's where the population is exploding the most. Instead of that, "they" have been slowly helping the situation to improve in Africa, saving millions of lives with other vaccines, farming, infrastructure etc. We don't hear about Africa's population decreasing, do we? So it would seem that the population is still increasing after all... and every theory under the sun is developed to explain how they've been killing us for years...in negative numbers!
    1
  1071.  @insanegenius5321  You're worrying too much about the vaccine for the moment: there are things being studied, but there is no vaccine ready to put on the market, so any question of temperature etc is irrelevant for the moment. Let the virologists work all that out. They know what they're doing if nobody else does.
    1
  1072. Wow! Getting inundated with links now; way too much to look into today, but I must say I'm happy to see at last some real sources! It took a while... but we've got there in the end! What I've been saying on multiple threads is to stop simply misquoting and citing youtubers, but rather to cite solid evidence from scientific studies, and you've included some here, so no problem with that. Once it gets to that level, I prefer letting the scientists fight it out between themselves. On polio vaccines in India : Correlation between Non-Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis Rates with Pulse Polio Frequency in India https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121585/pdf/ijerph-15-01755.pdf Brief extract of the conclusions : "5. Conclusions The polio eradication programme succeeded in drastically reducing the global spread of this disease, which was achieved through the use of immunization with OPV. While commending this enormous effort at eradication, our observation supports the hypothesis that the frequency of pulse polio administration is directly or indirectly related to the incidence of NPAFP. It is hoped that this finding will help continue efforts at optimizing the dose schedule of OPV administration and result in a reduction in NPAFP—which is a feasible hope, as the incidence of wild polio is currently at an all-time low." And this one, explaining why the vaccine causes more cases now of polio than the natural strain : Mutant Strains Of Polio Vaccine Now Cause More Paralysis Than Wild Polio https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/06/28/534403083/mutant-strains-of-polio-vaccine-now-cause-more-paralysis-than-wild-polio "That eradication effort has been incredibly successful. In 1988, when the campaign began, there were 350,000 cases of polio around the world each year compared with the six so far this year. Zaffran credits the oral polio vaccine with getting the world incredibly close to wiping out a terrible disease. "Four regions of the world have totally eradicated the disease with the use of the oral polio vaccine," he notes. "Of course we need to recognize that there have been a few cases of children paralyzed because of the vaccine virus, which is regrettable. But, you know, from a public health perspective, the benefits far outweigh the risk." This one, with regards to malaria: First Results of Phase 3 Trial of RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine in African Children https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1102287 "Conclusions The RTS,S/AS01 vaccine provided protection against both clinical and severe malaria in African children. " "A malaria vaccine, deployed in combination with current malaria-control tools, could play an important role in future control and eventual elimination of malaria in Africa."
    1
  1073.  @hervedupont6955  Parce que chrétien c'est mieux? Ah ben oui! Comme ça on pourrait relancer la chasse aux sorcières, l'inquisition, les croisades... et légaliser la pédophilie!
    1
  1074. @Anto Erickson So you went on holiday once to India.... and spoke with experts on the matter, or with random people in the street?
    1
  1075. What?
    1
  1076. Maybe they couldn't find any.
    1
  1077. ET si on arrêtait de jouer le jeu de l'état et on boycottait ce débat ridicule pour parler des choses importantes... comme la précarité, violence policière, environnement, disparition des services publiques....?
    1
  1078.  @xxraptorsc0pezxx  religion (from Cambridge English dictionary: "the belief in and worship of a god or gods, or any such system of belief and worship" Christianity is a religion. Believing in God is a religious belief. God doesn't say so, the dictionary says so. The dictionary defines words.
    1
  1079.  @xxraptorsc0pezxx  Well that's about all the reasoning I'd expect. You obviously can't even understand a simple dictionary definition...
    1
  1080.  @xxraptorsc0pezxx  Yeah yeah, you can't even have a discussion, so jog on.
    1
  1081. Sympa. Il a un vrai souci de complexe de supériorité, votre divinité. Un peu psychopathe sur les bords aussi on dirait, sans mentionner sadique et narcissique. Comme beaucoup de divinités, quand on y pense...
    1
  1082. Le droit de la fermer? Le droit d’être ridiculisé? (mettez un homme nu devant des femmes, regardez comment elles rigolent et se moquent de lui. Mettez une femme nue devant des hommes.... s'il y un qui rigole, c'est un monstre insensible).
    1
  1083. Punir ce pompier par une suspension revient à punir des personnes qu'il aurait pu sauver s'il était au travail. Le sanctionner en l'enlevant la possibilité de travail = en quelque sort non assistance à personnes en danger, chose qui est punissable par la loi!
    1
  1084. Or.....he moves his hands a lot.
    1
  1085.  @nubianeagle8634  Well, there you go then; proves my point.
    1
  1086. Bet you're proud.
    1
  1087.  @darmaster88  Yes please.
    1
  1088.  @darmaster88  Oh well, you could always try again...
    1
  1089.  @darmaster88  "joe public lol they've literally censored me every time I've tried to do it. I've tried many times in other threads. Sorry." Never mind.
    1
  1090.  @chaybbx8767  En fait il m'a répondu en s'excusant: il change d'opérateur en ce moment et ça l'énerve.....chose que je veux bien comprendre! Pour moi, les opérateurs de téléphonie sont largement pire que des féministes! Ça excuse pour moi tout comportement! ;)
    1
  1091.  @chaybbx8767  Ouais... le pauvre.Qu'il se défoule ici. Solidarité et tout ça....
    1
  1092. Yeah, what about it? There was also Clade X, Atlantic Storm, Dark Winter... So?
    1
  1093.  @cherryJ11  You're completely misquoting him. Go back and listen again. The rate of population increase can be reduced by 10-15%. It's a rate of increase, so it involves no killing, no population reduction, just reduction of rate of increase. The reduction of C (emissions of CO2 from industry) can be obtained if you use "clean" energy sources, hence the title of the talk.
    1
  1094.  @cherryJ11  Noooo... he says the population is increasing and will continue to do so (until stabilisation around 10-11 billion, but that's another subject which he doesn't go into himself here). At no point does he suggest it would be desirable to lower the population. He says if you want the result of the equation to be zero, you can't kill off people, you can't expect them to live with less amenities, you can't expect less production of stuff (whether it be TVs, cars or anything else the modern world desires), so the only way to get the CO2 excess (remember, it's only the excess we're talking about) down to zero is by the last element, which is CO2 produced by the energy source.
    1
  1095. ... but they didn't .... because they understood.
    1
  1096. @AB05 No. They didn't because they understood. If you just hear two words in the same paragraph and automatically link them, it's you that's not listening.
    1
  1097. @AB05 Why do you forget to add the "but there we see an increase of about 1.3"? It's the most important bit.... yet you ignore it completely. Want to string words together and then put an interpretation? Fine, but use all the words. He says a complete sentence, so use all of it.
    1
  1098. @AB05 Ok, are you trolling or what? 4:35 if you like for a time stamp. 9 divided by 6.8 =1,323529412, or "about 1.3" Or, if you prefer, 6.8 times 1.3 =8.84 or "about 9" Still don't get what the 1.3 means? By the way, what are you on about, "producing the population"? Do you mean reducing? I didn't put a timestamp on that because he didn't say it.
    1
  1099. @AB05 Yep, you're trolling.
    1
  1100. Qui veulent nous implanter des puces? Quel rapport avec des vaccins?
    1
  1101. @Zuzana Stachova So what do you think he means by "best investment"? Couldn't he actually mean "best" as in "the right thing to do"? He's also trying to encourage other billionaires to give money too, and one of way appealing to investors is by saying "look, you stand to gain out of this in the end" because he knows that to convince business men, you have to talk business. I can't assert of course that he's an altruistic angel, but why not consider the possibility that after gaining huge wealth that can no longer buy him happiness because he has everything, he might just want (pushed by his wife and children?) to do something good for the world before he dies, even if it's just to inflate his on ego? Just a possibility... with no more or less proof to back it up than what you or others suggest.
    1
  1102. @Zuzana Stachova You too... but whatever, don't discuss with others, you might find you're lacking in arguments!
    1
  1103. @Zuzana Stachova No, I have arguments. I've researched, I've got links to support every claim I make.
    1
  1104. Same ones that clap for shit on Britain's Got Talent.
    1
  1105.  @evanduca2741  Il a honte parce que 3€ de supplément ça fait un peu cher pour des herbes de n'importe quel provenance!
    1
  1106. Maybe because he consults the leading experts in the world?
    1
  1107. Don't worry, they'll be there, in the frontline. We call this "cannon fodder"!
    1
  1108. Yes, the depopulation agenda! The famous agenda started at least ten years ago (remember, when Gates "openly admitted" something that he didn't (but that's a minor detail).... the agenda that has seen the population actually increase by a billion since it came into play.... Ok, so it's not very successful yet.... but they're working on it!
    1
  1109. Maybe your sky dish shaded it?
    1
  1110.  @brits72  So maybe it just died of natural causes. I've never had any vegetation die under satellite dishes, and I've lived in a few houses where that was necessary.
    1
  1111.  @brits72  So.... your bush isn't exactly under the dish but way down and to the left... What about the stuff that is directly under the dish; dead is it?
    1
  1112.  @brits72  Ok... but for it to be a proper examination I will need high definition images and a beautiful assistant with a pony tail and glasses. It's essential for a proper investigation.
    1
  1113.  @spicygamma3834  Oh ok. Still not much of a comment though.
    1
  1114.  @major5554  If you consider contraception evil, so be it. I call not having contraception evil., barbaric, a crime against humanity and profoundly oppressive towards women. So it's difficult to argue that one with you. Gates saying that population can be lowered by 10 to 15% is just utter rubbish, however, and easily disproved. All you have to do is listen to all of it to understand. Proof in figures : ten years later we're one billion more.
    1
  1115.  Maria Salinas  Being a sex symbol is not limited to the clothes you wear. George Clooney doesn't generally wear very sexualising clothes.... but he's definitely a sex symbol.
    1
  1116. Well, if it's white privilege, how comes the speaker isn't white? How comes only three of the five up front are white?
    1
  1117.  @firefly4873  Whilst I agree with you that some of his investments aren't exactly the best, there's a lot that I don't agree with: Planned Parenthood is about promoting contraception, not abortion. Do you not think this is a good thing? Would you prefer it if women remained slaves, breeding machines with no choice over their bodies? As for the sterilisation of children in Africa.... have you got any actual evidence of that? (Please do not cite a youtube video as a source). India too; got any proof? Are they "his vaccines".... or does he just fund scientists that do all the research? Does he have to be a "saint" or the antichrist? Is there not possibility of a middle ground?
    1
  1118.  @andreocity8031  And yet they're the ones accusing us of being sheep. "WaKe Up sHeEpLe!" as they're so fond of saying !
    1
  1119. Which he wasn't at the wheel of when they first shot him.... therefore unarmed.
    1
  1120.  @AZCobraman  Yes, I knew that... because I've been told so. Did he?
    1
  1121. The Sun..... such a huge contributor to the youth and the environment...
    1
  1122. Generally we don't find cures for this kind of stuff: we find vaccines....
    1
  1123.  @vgamwa4338  La vraie question devrait être "que fait le gouvernement"? Et si il aidait à reloger les Haïtiens, tout le monde dirait "pourquoi il n'aide pas le gens qui meurent en Afrique?"
    1
  1124.  @vgamwa4338  C'est quoi une ricine?
    1
  1125. No.
    1
  1126. @FBI Open Up!!! Did you actually listen to the end of the equation?
    1
  1127. Hope you're not a cop then.
    1
  1128.  @nonaurbizniz7440  I have an issue with people who think that was legitimate. That's why I hope you're not a cop, because I don't want madmen like you policing my streets. Understand now?
    1
  1129.  @nonaurbizniz7440  Naa, you're alright; I'll just stay in my own country which isn't full of trigger-happy Muricans, thank you very much. Plenty of police brutality here, don't get me wrong, but way less murders/executions/unfortunate accidents.
    1
  1130. I think you'll find that there are teams who pick litter all through the festival. Have you ever been to one?
    1
  1131. Okay. What have you got against him?
    1
  1132. Maybe we could agree on it being a dodecahedron*, then? *spellcheck wants to put rhododendron, which is a possibility also. Can you disprove it?
    1
  1133.  @JuniorRodigan  So the Pope is on visit to the States, and flies in to Las Vegas... As he leaves the plane, the pilot says "it was an honour to fly you, Elvis, a real honour! "But I'm not Elvis!" exclaims the Pope and walks down to his limousine, kissing the tarmac on the way, of course. The limousine takes him to the hotel, and as he steps out, the chauffeur says "wow! Wait till I tell my wife I drove The King, the King of rock'n roll!" "But I'm not Elvis, I'm the Pope!" says the Pope, and walks into the hotel. In his room, the bellboy poses his luggage and says "Sir, greatest singer ever, if you need anything, I can get it for you. Here we have the best of everything: coke, hookers, you name it!" The Pope says "fank ya fank ya verr muccchhhh"
    1
  1134. Well, technically, as stated in the video, it could be for an atheist. This said, anyone who feels aggressed by someone saying "bless you" is obviously a total asshole and probably deserves a good kicking, to learn what aggression really is!
    1
  1135. The thing is though, you have to be careful about these rumours. What makes you say his kids aren't vaccinated, for example? I've looked into it, but haven't found a shred of evidence to support that claim. Have you seen something that might convince me otherwise?
    1
  1136. Quoi? Coronavirus et pollution n'ont rien à voir....
    1
  1137. Can you link to this footage please?
    1
  1138. @Anto Erickson "everyone knows that this guy did created the virus" : False. I don't think he did, nor do (probably) a majority of sane people.
    1
  1139. @Anto Erickson So you should have some evidence to back up what you're saying if it's true. You do have some evidence, don't you?
    1
  1140. Before social media we couldn't hear teenagers when we were propping up the bar... Now we have to listen to them. The under 18 laws in bars is nothing to do with alcohol consumption!
    1
  1141. Ben oui.... il a envie de finir ses phrases.
    1
  1142. What did you expect, lies? It's simple because.... it's a simple truth. No ten ways about it. Bringing down P, S, or E is bad ( or at least unfair), so you have to bring down the last one, C (CO2). Easy. Should be easy to understand for everyone, but some don't listen to the end of the equation.
    1
  1143.  @danielswish41  Well if that's a sign of a great man.... "not starting any war at all"! In most other countries we just consider that normal. Only Americans could say "what a victory: four years without starting a single war!"
    1
  1144.  @factudocs  I think he means facebook and whatsapp!
    1
  1145.  @portelm3137  Careful when you say: "he wants to decrease the population by expanding healthcare services and therefore reducing birth rates." That's exactly what he's not doing; he wants to decrease the population GROWTH. Your words reinforce the argument of depopulation! I know what you mean, but be careful not to leave out the important words. As I said further up, six point eight to nine is an increase. In ten years the population has increased by one billion. This is not a population decrease.
    1
  1146. Hang on a minute.... if Bill Gates is building 5g viruses in Wuhan with his bat-worshipping wife...... who is poisoning so many children in Africa with vaccines to reduce world population, that their numbers are still steadily increasing? I always thought it was him personally administering all the vaccines, like in that magazine photo...
    1
  1147. What are you going on about?
    1
  1148.  @yael8559  Oui.... malheureusement je ne crois pas que Amy B pensait aux mêmes personnes....
    1
  1149.  @itgelmunkhbaatar4834  That sounds physically impossible
    1
  1150. Please explain where he says that? I thought (because I listened to the end of the equation) he said the last factor, C, should be reduced to near zero. How do you explain that bit?
    1
  1151.  @jessicadaniels5501  No it's not.Why don't you listen to the end of the equation? CO2 = P x S x E x C P= people S= services per person E= energy per service C = carbon dioxide per unit energy The last one, C, must come down to zero because all the others will increase, even if you slow down the rate of increase. "Innovating to zero" = creating alternative energy sources that do not produce CO2. Hence the title of the talk. Simple maths: anything x anything x anything x zero = zero.
    1
  1152.  @jessicadaniels5501  No you haven't understood what he said at all. You showed it when you said population needs to come down near to zero. "because you can't get the amount of c down to near 0 without the amount of people being there first. The variable that the amount of all the other variables depends upon is the amount of people". That shows that you have no understanding whatsoever. If you can't understand simple algebra I can't help you either. Try it with real numbers, shall we? Let's replace P by 10, S by 10, E by 10, and C by zero. 10x10x10x0 =0. 7.8 billion x I trillion x ten trillion trillion x 0 = ..........yes, zero. The CO2 he's talking about is the excess CO2 produced by industry. It's a pretty closed circuit normally, but the constant burning of fossil fuel puts more CO2 into the air than there should be. Add to that deforestation, excessive animal farming, and you get an excess of CO2. Of course CO2 is useful and necessary and wonderful..... but so is water and if there's too much of it you drown. Now if you choose to conveniently ignore the points I corrected you on that's fine, don't acknowledge it, even if it is impolite, but don't claim to understand him whilst bringing up points that a ten year old could debunk.
    1
  1153. In the "Peoples Rainbow Unicorn Tribunal"
    1
  1154.  @radicalvans_1270  So.... his childrens' doctor (anonymous) said it at a meeting (anonymous, dateless), and it was recorded (but never diffused anywhere). So that's a doctor breaking oath, by the way. Not to be trusted, even if he (or she) did really exist. Major fault. Depopulation? When? Evidence please.
    1
  1155. Ok for the clickbait, but please don't repeat bits to drive home the point: we can hear, so there's no need, no need n-o-o-o n-e-e-d-d-d-d-d....... please don't repeat repeat repeat...... See: bloody annoying isn't it?!
    1
  1156.  @totalwater3053  The mother is responsible for the child being born and therefore responsible for it's predicament.... You can twist logic any way you want...
    1
  1157. Depends where you are. In New Delhi you'd be hard pushed to call it blue...
    1
  1158. Wow, really? Can you give me a link to such a video please? I'd love to see a film of him "administering" vaccines to someone!
    1
  1159. How very, very convenient that you don't feel the need to share your knowledge with such low-down folks as myself. Isn't withholding knowledge supposed to be the tactic of the ruling class? So you're part of that, in fact? Such ego, to withhold important names from your fellow humans...! Looks like altruism (or just plain old sharing) is well and truly dead.
    1
  1160.  @karidufano6614  Here's an example of one comment I've posted a few times....not on the same subject (or is it?!) but note the bit about sources: My predicted conversation with any conspiracy theorist: Here's what will happen, if we debate a bit: You'll say "Bill Gates wants to kill half the population, he was chucked out of India, Melinda is a man." I'll ask you for your sources, you'll either say "google it" or "do your own research" or "I don't give links anymore," or « follow the money », or "watch the Corbett report" or you'll just carry on spouting random rubbish. Then I'll give you my sources, which clearly show you're wrong, but you'll refuse to read (yes READ, not watch, sorry!), saying it's all just biased reports paid by "Big Pharma". Conveniently for you, everything which doesn't go in your sense is sponsored by Bill Gates, including me and anyone else who disagrees with you. Since "almost all media" is apparently funded by Gates (funny how it includes media from every single country in the world), except what's on youtube (which is ironic because it's mainly thanks to him that we're on youtube in the first place), it's impossible to provide you with any evidence. Yet you will ask repeatedly, saying mine isn't good enough without giving any yourself. You will spout on about how evil he is, with lots of CAPITAL LETTERS (you're probably catholic, so I can understand that anyone who promotes contraception is evil to you, since you haven't evolved from the Dark Ages), and completely ignore anything I say. When I ask if at the very least you use Linux and not Windows, you won't reply. Am I wrong?
    1
  1161. I can't cook.... but as for comedy I'd say I prefer British cinema but American standup.
    1
  1162.  @shoutatthesky  I'm thinking of classics such as the Life of Brian...
    1
  1163.  @shoutatthesky  Cultural upbringing has a lot to do with how you understand humour, of course, but I also think there's a place for just simple personal taste: I didn't grow up with American standup, but since I discovered George Carlin, Louis CK, Dave Chappelle, to name but a few, there's been no turning back! Internet has been great for that. Shows just how limited television was (and still is). As for British comedy falling flat for you, I'd say exactly! It's the falling flat that makes us laugh!
    1
  1164. Further up I saw "microships" (very small boats), and now we've got HOLLY CHIP, which I can only suppose is a new Christmas potato shape from McDonalds?
    1
  1165. Des points très intéressants... mais pour "autrice et compositrice" je dirai que c'est exactement ce que veulent les feminstes, non? Ne pas faire de distinction entre masculin et féminin dans les métiers. Personnellement, je suis Anglais, alors on a beaucoup moins de distinctions déjà au départ, puisque le plupart des choses sont neutre. Ceci dit, j'avais appris qu'en Français, le masculin servait aussi de neutre, donc un mot comme "professeur", par exemple, n'est pas automatiquement masculin, mais neutre.
    1
  1166.  @zeralmahib2549  Ça fait parti du débat.
    1
  1167.  @AzurMoire  Ouais.... je trouve que ça complique les phrases pour rien; il vous faut deux fois plus de temps pour parler à celles et ceux (et cs qui ne s'identifient pas comme l'une ou l'autre) des "e e.es.s" enfin tu vois! Très Français ça: vos numéros sont compliqué pour rien aussi! Au lieu de dire septante, octante et nonante vous avez quatre-vingt dix... C'est du calcul à faire tout ça! On peut interpréter le féminin de façon différente aussi: pourquoi dire qu'elle doit être séparé pour exister? C'est plutôt le masculin qui n'existe qu'un moitié parce que c'est aussi le neutre. C'est une façon "victime" de voir les mots.C'est se donner une complexe d'infériorité soi même.
    1
  1168. Was that a word you invented yourself..... or was it one you started using because you've seen it used so many times in conspiracy videos and their associated comments? Funny how all these people who are not "sheeple" all use the same vocabulary...
    1
  1169. Have you tried guided relaxation audios? there are plenty on youtube. They help me sleep...
    1
  1170.  @yokartik  Hashish then.
    1
  1171.  @yokartik  I can imagine, depending on where you are, but if it works for you, the "side effects" are less than with pills. There's always ways to grow your own not too expensively... But yeah, generalised legalisation would help.
    1
  1172.  @yokartik  Ouch! That is expensive
    1
  1173. @mhffc What do "normal" people do with their rubbish then? Oh yeah, they put it outside their front door and it magically goes away....
    1
  1174.  @missosologycoverage  I don't think you can accuse the immigrant workers of not taking it seriously; they probably take it more seriously than anyone else, but don't have the luxury of being able to practice isolation or social distancing. Like in all poor places/regions/countries, they have no choice but to go out to work or they will simply starve. It's happening, and may well cause more deaths than the virus...
    1
  1175. The term did exist before... https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=conspiracy+theory&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cconspiracy%20theory%3B%2Cc0#t1%3B%2Cconspiracy%20theory%3B%2Cc0
    1
  1176. Apparently, that's asking too much of people!!
    1
  1177.  Ami From Texas BEAR  Do you really believe such a vast and complex society as ours could exist or survive without social engineering?
    1
  1178.  @catdamon9654  " bringing polio and other diseases through vaccines into places like Africa" : are you serious? You seem to have got things very, very confused! At least try to keep up with the story.
    1
  1179.  @catdamon9654  Polio in Africa for example comes mostly from vaccine derived polio because the "wild" polio has been eliminated. That's why I suggested you were confused in your information. The vaccine derived outbreaks are however very small and obviously explainable when you consider that if there was no polio to start with, no vaccine would be needed. If you vaccinate everyone, evidently you end up with a few cases of vaccine derived polio. The benefit far outweighs the danger. So, does he "sponsor" this? Well, yes, he funds vaccination programs. In the 2015 lecture I think he said it could be natural or man made, but I'm not going to sit through it now to check!
    1
  1180. She wonders if she got where she is today through.... her dominant nature.... Well, yeah. Looks like it's nothing to do with her sex or colour, just her ambition. So what's the problem?
    1
  1181. It's not that I'm interested.... I'm just curious why you didn't give the name straight away?
    1
  1182. Wotcha rabbiting 'bout? We ain't got no fekkin' accent!
    1
  1183.  @Layo78  If you think she was a "screaming old lady" you must've led a very sheltered life up til now... When did she scream exactly?
    1
  1184.  @gromitpesley  Thanks for your feedback...
    1
  1185.  @JoyceParker_AmaDio  Yes, they do. What's your point?
    1
  1186.  @basedblackbeard4456  Except that he didn't.
    1
  1187.  @basedblackbeard4456  Misquoted, (come on, at least get the citation right) and truncated. Highly dishonest of you. Your mother would be ashamed of you.
    1
  1188.  @basedblackbeard4456  Why don't you quote up to 4:53? It's the end of the sentence, after all, so should be a logical place to end a quote... even if you choose to ignore the end of the equation.
    1
  1189.  @basedblackbeard4456  Well you weren't very combative, were you? When someone corrects you, you could acknowledge it. Just saying...
    1
  1190.  @gayhumpbackwhale3754  Their argument will always (conveniently) be that being blatantly out in the open about highly secret plans makes the magic stronger...... and it's kind of hard to argue with that kind of logic!
    1
  1191.  @abfmkarin  "Less people" would have the desired effect, yes. BUT nobody is suggesting that as a reasonable solution because reducing the actual population would involve killing people, which is a very bad idea. As Gates explains, even if the population stabilises eventually, it won't make that much difference, so you have to find other means to get the CO2 down. More people means more agriculture, more forest burning, more cattle etc etc. Your ban on hiking (why hiking, by the way, rather than jet-skis, quads, trial bikes and all the other highly destructive sports practiced in nature?) won't have a whole lot of effect. So "less people who occupy....is all that needs to be done" is a kind of ridiculous statement, which puts YOU in the position of someone suggesting genocide as a solution.
    1
  1192. Yeah! Great isn't it?!
    1
  1193. Or maybe you erased your own comments by mistake?
    1
  1194.  @threetunes7810  Try to stay cool: I know these people are infuriating, but more good can be done by calmly explaining than insulting. Remember, these comments are read by other people (the ones who maybe you can enlighten), so all the exchanges of insults are pointless, if mildly entertaining! Don't let them wind you up, it's what they want. Whoever starts first, it doesn't matter; not descending to their level means not responding to their bullshit with more bullshit. If only one person in an argument uses insults, we can all see it's because he has nothing better to say.
    1
  1195. How to ruin a joke...
    1
  1196. Then again, when you see that most of them are christians you can see how they base their belief system on an old book...
    1
  1197.  @tw3ntythr337  Do you know what research is, or do you just watch youtube videos?
    1
  1198.  @stanbily9416  Think about it: you said " His father was the head of Planned Parenthood & he is planning to vaccinate everyone. Please do your research!" Planned parenthood is part of what he believes in. It goes hand in hand with bringing down the growth of our population. What's so hard to understand?
    1
  1199. Yes but there was also the rest of the sentence, wasn't there?
    1
  1200.  @justincaseOne  uncle? I don't get you. He finishes the sentence by saying "but there we see an increase of about 1.3", which is the subject of the phrase. By omitting it, you distort the meaning of the phrase. That's why I asked you why you omitted it. So why, please?
    1
  1201. What a total asshole. People like him are why the world is going nuts.
    1
  1202. You were doing well with the transcript. Why did you stop at that precise point? Why not finish the sentence? Why not finish the equation?
    1
  1203. Before replying to my comment, which I'm sure you will do being a polite and intelligent person, you'd better read this- it's a post I made a while back, which is knocking around somewhere not too far: My predicted conversation with any conspiracy theorist: Here's what will happen, if we debate a bit: You'll say "Bill Gates wants to kill half the population, he was chucked out of India, Melinda is a man." I'll ask you for your sources, you'll either say "google it" or "do your own research" or "I don't give links anymore," or « follow the money », or "watch the Corbett report" or you'll just carry on spouting random rubbish. Then I'll give you my sources, which clearly show you're wrong, but you'll refuse to read (yes READ, not watch, sorry!), saying it's all just biased reports paid by "Big Pharma". Conveniently for you, everything which doesn't go in your sense is sponsored by Bill Gates, including me and anyone else who disagrees with you. Since "almost all media" is apparently funded by Gates (funny how it includes media from every single country in the world), except what's on youtube (which is ironic because it's mainly thanks to him that we're on youtube in the first place), it's impossible to provide you with any evidence. Yet you will ask repeatedly, saying mine isn't good enough without giving any yourself. You will spout on about how evil he is, with lots of CAPITAL LETTERS (you're probably catholic, so I can understand that anyone who promotes contraception is evil to you, since you haven't evolved from the Dark Ages), and completely ignore anything I say. When I ask if at the very least you use Linux and not Windows, you won't reply. Am I wrong?
    1
  1204.  allana  Not sure I get much of what you're saying...but it seems you're for legalisation too. :) I think a part of prostitution is probably playing therapist; or is that just a sort of "romantic" image of the prostitute nodding in compassion as the client sits on the edge of the bed and recounts his childhood? Maybe that would be a bigger part of the job if it didn't take place in the bushes in the park.... You know, I'll even go as far as to say that people use their bodies to entertain others in many ways, which can even be dangerous. Circus performers, for example. Could what we consider "sexual" be compared to using any other body parts in an extreme way? A juggler uses his hands, a Thai ping-pong show girl uses her vagina to juggle, a prostitute uses her vagina to massage penises. It's a bit gross when stated like that.... but really, in fact, what is the difference except that which our culture applies to it?
    1
  1205. Yes.
    1
  1206.  @maurov39  He's already married, so how can I? That would be not only illegal, but also immoral.
    1
  1207. Alors ne te considère pas comme féministe mais comme humaniste.
    1
  1208. Herbs can be great. Most medicine is based on molecules from plants... which aren't always available in sufficient quantities to use in their natural forms.
    1
  1209. Welcome to TED
    1
  1210.  @aparnashakti6309  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosynthesis
    1
  1211. Why on Earth don't you listen to what he's actually saying, instead of recycling the paranoid garbage spouted by catholics?
    1
  1212.    "People like you who are so damn biased and dont research even for a minute what he could mean by that other than ''i want to kill people with vaccines'' are beyond lost." -Nah it's ok; the catholic religion lets you buy your way back on track! ;) There does seem to be a strong correlation between conspiracy theorists and catholics.... maybe because neither think proof is important?! I didn't notice at first, but a friend pointed it out to me; so many of these commenters' accounts are religious nutters...
    1
  1213. Oh that video: the one with the lying title?
    1
  1214. Suite à la loi de l'année dernière qui empêche les gens de dissimuler le visage... Tout le monde se promène avec une masque (sauf les flics). Et aujourd'hui, on ne se fait pas arrêté si on court (c'est légal et justifie la présence dehors). Alors si vous voyez des flics: mettez vos masques et courez!
    1
  1215. "Psychopathic plans"? I see no evidence of that.... "Useless eaters"? When did he say that? ""Culled like a pestilence" Who on Earth is proning that? If "they" have been "culling" since 2010 at least, when this video was made, how come the population has gone up by a billion? "They" are obviously very bad at culling!
    1
  1216.  @classicgalactica5879  I've eaten sausages from many countries, but the German ones were by far the wurst. Bet you've never heard that one before! ;)
    1
  1217. That's a racist thing to say! I'm reporting you..... for being "time-ist" (because why just "now" and not before and after?)
    1
  1218. Why are you pretending to quote him? Isn't that a bit dishonest? Bearing in mind that this talk was 10 years ago, and there's another billion extra people on earth, the depopulation agenda doesn't seem to be working very well... Maybe there is no depopulation agenda after all?
    1
  1219.  @Yabuturtle  Well it definitely seems to be taking time for their plan to work! At a rate of a billion extra people every ten years they'd sure better hurry up if they want to start depopulating! The longer they leave it, the further down it's got to go! I most certainly wouldn't "do it as well" if I were in their position. I'd do exactly what's suggested here: improve everyone's living conditions so that they auto-regulate. That's not just common sense (which isn't common at all), it's been shown to have happened already in other countries. Stage three demographic transition ( or why population increase slows down with better living conditions): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition#Stage_three
    1
  1220.  @LucianCorrvinus  You could've said "roommate". Just saying...
    1
  1221.  @Rose_333_Buds  It's not the poster of the video who came up with that explanation: The Best stats you’ve ever seen -Hans Rosling https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usdJgEwMinM Stage three demographic transition ( or why population increase slows down with better living conditions): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition#Stage_three Or even the man himself explaining the principle : Bill Gates explains concept : does saving more lives lead to overpopulation ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obRG-2jurz0 Now, can you show me something to uphold your idea that it's " the most scientifically UNsupported and baseless one"?
    1
  1222.  @Rose_333_Buds  So now explain what "well off" means...
    1
  1223.  @samerm8657  Well, he's honest.... he admits to pussy grabbing. He's humble.... except with regards to himself. He's got a caring heart..... well, he cares a lot about what people think of him.
    1
  1224.  @fantasia243645  So? Immigration. If your country has a ageing population, you just have to let people come from other countries.
    1
  1225.  @fantasia243645  When people get forced to live in ghettos they tend to integrate less well, this is true. It doesn't mean it's generalised though. If they don't regard their new place as home, it's related to how well they're accepted in the first place. You can't really base an argument on immigration on one or two anecdotes though. I happen to live in France....
    1
  1226.  @fantasia243645  We're not talking about forced immigration here though.
    1
  1227.  @fantasia243645  Because you're assuming it's people who have to leave...what about those who simply choose to?
    1
  1228.  @fantasia243645  Ok if you like. If going where the grass is greener is being forced... (poor homeless millionaires, by the way!)
    1
  1229.  @fantasia243645  Choice makes a huge difference I would say! It's funny how the language has changed with regards to that. Before, we had refugees, now we have only migrants. All the refugees have mysteriously vanished and been replaced by migrants! I think the two exist and should be differentiated.
    1
  1230.  @fantasia243645  That's just one way of seeing it though. You can't say all forms of immigration are the same. I left my country with nobody forcing me, because I moved from Britain to France. My country wasn't war-torn, I was in no danger. Some are, so they're completely different situations. Both exist. Even if it means leaving family behind, if you get the opportunity to move to a country where you can earn lots of money, many will be only too happy to go. Increased freedom of circulation means you don't necessarily have to leave behind your family...
    1
  1231.  @fantasia243645  We'll have to differ on that! I left my home for another, but nobody forced me.It happens.
    1
  1232. I suggest you battle that out with the God Squad and leave the real world to the rest of us!
    1
  1233.  @argumentumadhominem3977  predictive programming? Nah: forecast.
    1
  1234. @Kugrox Whatever you do, don't bother coming back and saying thanks for the explanation you asked for...
    1
  1235. ....et je trouve que les femmes ont des torses très sympas!
    1
  1236. I don't get you: freedom of speech has nothing to do with filming police... and anyway why on Earth would you expect a president, any president, to be coherent?!
    1
  1237. P.S. Everywhere is more safe than we're led to believe.
    1
  1238. So say nothing. You need to listen further.
    1
  1239.  @lavendertown1262  The thing is, I did listen. Did you get to the end of the equation?
    1
  1240. I partly agree with that.
    1
  1241.  @ffxivonline5864  source?
    1
  1242.  @ffxivonline5864  source?
    1
  1243. Why? A good cocktail maker, is he?
    1
  1244. Erm.... maybe. What do you mean?
    1
  1245. For f**ks sake, are you that stupid?? When he talks about cutting CO2 down to zero, it's obvious (or should be) that he's talking about the excess created by industry/agriculture. Of course you can't bring all CO2 emission down to zero: that would imply stopping every living animal from breathing, blocking off volcanoes... stupid. He's talking to a crowd of intelligent people, so doesn't bother mentioning such elementary details. Genocide? Got the slightest bit of actual evidence to back that up? When does he propose that as a solution?? The only bit that you said that is intelligent is the fact that we do indeed waste a lot of resources. That's why pretty much everyone agrees that the world can accommodate a higher population, if we redistribute the resources more equitably.
    1
  1246.  @MrFreddiew1  I have.
    1
  1247. The flu jab is a very particular case: not very effective because it only covers a part of the viruses that are out there (different flu jab every year depending on the most likely strains of virus peaking that year). Also, it's mainly given to old people, who are generally prone to getting sick and dying due to their age.
    1
  1248.  @phattebytch  just consider how many people in the world have received vaccines, and how many have complained. Not that many really, when you consider the proportions.
    1
  1249.  @insanegenius5321  No, it couldn't mean anything: in the same sentence he says it. "Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 %, but there we see an increase of about 1.3." "That" refers to the 1.3 increase.
    1
  1250.  @mattmatt9324  You can't just go around asking intelligent questions like that! Yvonne says he's evil, so he's evil, ok?
    1
  1251. T'as oublié Clara Morgane.... ;) désolé les gens, c'était trop facile!
    1
  1252. In what way?
    1
  1253. How to explain simply..... First, what's the title of the talk? Something about innovating...and zero, no? This means using innovative technology to create energy sources that don't emit CO2. Solar power for example, or wind power, emit no CO2 (except at the construction phase). Next, that equation: CO2 = P x S x E x C P= people S= services per person E= energy per service C = carbon dioxide per unit energy The last one, C, must come down to zero because all the others will increase, even if you slow down the rate of increase. "Innovating to zero" = creating alternative energy sources that do not produce CO2. Simple maths: anything x anything x anything x zero = zero. Conclusion: vaccines do not in any way reduce CO2 output from industry. Vaccines are part of the process of stage 3 demographic transition, whereby people have less children because of better living conditions and education. This slows down population growth a little. As he says, that makes an insignificant difference to CO2 emissions, so it's the energy production that has to produce zero CO2. Does that still sound dumb to you?
    1
  1254. I'll agree with you that I.Q. levels seem to be diminishing, if the Youtube comments section is anything to go by (which luckily it isn't). Let's take your own comment as an example: aside from the overuse of capital letters, it starts with a completely ridiculous statement showing you have understood nothing of the ideas he explains. It then goes on to spout out another series of ridiculous statements which merit even less consideration than the first. Using words like "puerile" and "obtuse" won't convince anyone of your intelligence.You'd need to actually talk some sense.
    1
  1255. source?
    1
  1256.  @Marauder1981  Links then?
    1
  1257.    Anything's possible here...
    1
  1258. @Anto Erickson dumbasses.
    1
  1259. ....says Karen
    1
  1260.  @petejackson7976  That' some fascinating information you've got there Pete! Could you give me some links please so I can do my own research?
    1
  1261.  @dogwalker666  Yeah, I was hoping the irony would seep through...
    1
  1262. Something tells me you understood nothing of what he said...
    1
  1263. Experts gathering data for many years, examining it, extrapolating from it. Bill then asks. Bill gets answers. Bill tells people, just like weatherman reads forecast. People don't listen. Five years later conspiracy theorists say it was him who made it. It rains, people want to hang the weatherman. Go figure...
    1
  1264.  @minnietoot9704  For it to be harassement it has to be several times, no?
    1
  1265.  @minnietoot9704  As for "Louis" and "come back" in the same phrase.... that should best be avoided.
    1
  1266. Il a un jolie décolleté, ce Jésus?
    1
  1267.  @marthecoulibaly6546  Merci, c'est noté! Sinon, il a une bonne décolleté ce Jésus?
    1
  1268.  @marthecoulibaly6546  Je n'ai pas exprimé de choix... j'ai posé une question. Apparemment, on ne va pas s'amuser avec la décolleté de ton Jésus....
    1
  1269.  @marthecoulibaly6546  Typique des fanatiques religieux: aucun sens d'humour! Sortez de votre "blabla amen" , utilisez vos propres mots et réfléchissez en dehors d'un vieux livre. Si "on nous a donné" la capacité de réfléchir c'est pas pour faire le perroquet!
    1
  1270.  @marthecoulibaly6546  Blablabla.... pas une pensée originale; c'est triste!
    1
  1271. So where's your evidence for that?
    1
  1272.    Careful now; people who believe in God may also believe you!
    1
  1273. OMG SIMPSONS PREDICTED EVERYTHING WAKE UP SHEEPLE!* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLmC7s1bYuQ *Yeah... it's called sarcasm.
    1
  1274. "The billionaire told The Daily Show the move will waste billions of dollars, but will save precious time".... that's a quote from the article you cite (don't worry, I didn't just read the title, but that quote sort of sums it all up. What's the problem with this one?
    1
  1275. You mean...... they have Adblock?
    1
  1276.  @BrianSmith-vl7xu  At least two every thirty seconds.
    1
  1277.  @despy1855  Yep. Still sarcasm. Just like it was last week. You even posted the same comment.
    1
  1278.  @alexioforte397  "the microchip is not in the vaccine. Neither is the luciferase quantum dot tattoo to see whos been vaccinated." Do you realise you're confirming what I'm saying to you? Exactly: there is no chip in the vaccines, and the quantum dot thing is being tested, but not in use. So what is your point?
    1
  1279.  @BrianSmith-vl7xu  What's that link you were saying to Em Pl? I can't see it in the thread...
    1
  1280.  @The_Reality_Filter  That's not a conspiracy theory.
    1
  1281.  @The_Reality_Filter  The 77 Brigade? That's a new one to me....
    1
  1282.  @dogwalker666  Oh well.... welcome to the brigade!
    1
  1283.  @Micscience  We're not talking about conspiracies. We're talking "conspiracy theory", which distinguishes itself by being based on fallacies to start with. Like linking 5G to COVID for example, where it's blatantly obvious that since there's no correlation between infection levels and 5G distribution, plus the biological impossibility, it's just a conspiracy theory. Conspiracies happen all the time. We all know that. You could pretty much say politics is one big conspiracy...
    1
  1284.  @Whachadoon  I suppose I must've asked you if you used Linux? So well done, you chose the system that's needlessly exclusive, needlessly expensive, over which you have the least control...
    1
  1285. I think you're a bigger fraud than people claim Bill Gates is. Why do you write in the third person? Mind you, if you're looking from gullible people to prey on (which you obviously are), you've come to the right place, judging by the comments!
    1
  1286.  @j.s3962  Justement, c'est ce que je venais de dire; la commerçante avec qui je parlais a dit que non, ça ne valait pas l'effort.
    1
  1287. Well they thoroughly botched that one up then..... which makes it seem very plausible!
    1
  1288.  @headhunter893  So you work in a bank, exploiting people with less money, benefitting from those companies that make money with human suffering, letting your industry get bailed out by taxpayers money, bought a car that pollutes for no reason other than showing off your wealth, rubbing it in the faces of others, so to speak... And you're proud of yourself?! Go read your Bible again.
    1
  1289.  @headhunter893  Oh I've got a job, don't worry about me. Just not a shitty one. With a name like "headhunter" to go with your story, you sound like one of the most un-christian spirited people I've ever had the misfortune to chat with.
    1
  1290.  @injunsun  what's mansplaining?
    1
  1291. People like who? ;)
    1
  1292. Fishy? Maybe they looked at our long global history of epidemics and pandemics, had some thoughts about all that information ( such as how freely we circulate in large numbers in the world since the 1970s), made a few correlations, counted dead weird animals on Chinese markets, extrapolated on the data, concluded stuff, all over a period of many years, leading up eventually to running exercises like firemen or the military do? I dunno, it's just an idea...
    1
  1293.  @Junpei09  Heureusement qu'on n'est pas en Afrique alors. Risquer de tuer quelqu'un pour une insulte n'est pas très professionnel... et puni par la loi.
    1
  1294.  Rogier -  People have less children for many reasons. Contraception :believe it or not, some women don't like being baby factories), Education: steering away from religious rubbish about going forth and multiplying, as well as social status (big family= respectable) Mechanisation: you need less farm labour (your children) if you have a tractor Health: if their children will all live to adulthood people do actually have less. Pus a whole bunch of lesser factors which all have an influence.
    1
  1295. Arrête de crier et donne tes sources pour de tels accusations.
    1
  1296. I suppose that you, at home put your rubbish in a bin? Guess what happens next: someone picks it up for you in a truck, takes it away, sorts through it to separate the things you missed, ships half of it off to another country, recycles some, composts some..... Now tell me what's different between your actions and a festival goers actions? Oh right, some of it is left on the floor? It gets picked up. Teams are there for that. It's one of the ways of going to the festival for free. "cancel future events until rubbish collection systems..." : Are you joking or what? Can't you see that rubbish collection systems are in place? That's why the field starts off green before the festival. It's been there since 1970. If there was no rubbish collection it wouldn't look like that now, would it? Think a bit. "some of the same people who lecture us": I think the environmentally aware people are probably a minority at the festival. There's a lot of young people.... young peope need educating, that's part of being young. So yeah, if you're going to think like that, stay at home, don't go out and mix with people, forget about your rubbish as soon as it's out of your front door (someone will deal with it, won't they?) and carry on pouring bleach down the drain as you consider yourself so morally superior.
    1
  1297. I was going to ( hilariously) reply that sticks object to that, and give you the link to "funny sticks" on google images.... and had to revise my opinion when I did google it : you're completely right; sticks aren't funny, except maybe one. https://www.google.com/search?q=funny+sticks&client=ubuntu&hs=Lkh&channel=fs&sxsrf=ALeKk02O7qnOf6fS3cmfXCuLG6FPFrfZHw:1604419893324&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiZmb_u4ebsAhXK6OAKHYt4Cl0Q_AUoAXoECA4QAw
    1
  1298. Well that's good to know! Happy typing !
    1
  1299. Considering how trigger happy they can be, it seems reasonable to panic. Human nature: when you panic you don't necessarily behave rationally. The police should know this. Fleeing does not justify execution.
    1
  1300. I thought it was satire... What's the racist bit; imitating his accent?
    1
  1301. He's talking about the excess CO2 generated by human agricutural and industrial activity. Only someone completely ignorant could imagine he's talking about reducing all CO2 to zero! Now if you're so quick to cite the science that explains what CO2 is and what purpose it serves, you should also consult the science that says we're producing way too much of it.
    1
  1302.  @ianmcdonald8648  None of them need to mention that it' necessary for plant life because it's been bloody obvious for generations. Are you going to seriouly dispute how plants work? You want a link? Sure: https://www.britannica.com/science/photosynthesis I could give yoy 500 links, but one gives the general idea. Now if you didn't learn that at school, and didn't do those basic experiments where you deprive plants of CO2 and light and watch them die, I'm sorry you didn't get an education. It's even explained in the link that you cited yourself, so I really don't understand what your point is?
    1
  1303.  @ianmcdonald8648  Pollution of the atmosphere is definately a major concern... although you must be careful when talking about toxic substances, because it's the quantity that is important, not just the presence. These substances are present everywhere, and often naturally, so it's the amount that makes it toxic or not. As for the "other side of the story"... you can only consider it if there really is another side. The subject is more often "how can we produce energy better?" because we all know that nobody wants to sacrifice their living standards, so the idea is to find out how we can do the same stuff, but cleaner. Developing countries want to follow our model; they want cars, TVs etc and don't see why they shouldn't have them, like us. Quite rightly so. So the question is, how do we give people what they want, but safely, and with the lowest possible impact on the planet. Forget about the media, whether it be "mass" or "alternative"; you'll never get the whole story from them. Concentrate on the actual science.The real debate is there. There's free, easy access to all the major scientific journals.Those are the people you know what they're talking about. If you think they're all corrupt and untrustworthy, stop using any invention that comes from science (including your computer) and return to being a hunter-gatherer, because even the most ancient agriculture is science, and playing with genetic selection.
    1
  1304.  @ianmcdonald8648  The whole point of science is not to place trust in any one person. It's not perfect, but it's the best system we have for the moment, with the highest chance of approaching something we might call truth. A person may be biased, but if he produces results from an experiment that you or anyone else can reproduce, it confirms his work. If only he can get a result, it's probably wrong for some reason. Peer reviewed journals exist specifically to weed out the bad apples, whether it be bias, corruption, human error, whatever. No other system we have works like that.It's precisely because people are not infallible that we need the scientific method. Science functions in community, sharing information, constantly re-testing, re-analysing, checking and counter-checking.It's even capable of admitting it's wrong, something no politician would ever do! (only half joking).
    1
  1305.  @ianmcdonald8648  I agree on part of what makes the backbone of a stable society, but would add the quest for truth. Integrity; yes, so you need a system with integrity.... science. Justice can also be included in this. As I said further up, find a better system than the scientific method. As for compassion, forgiveness etc; these are not covered by science ...unless you might want to consider the social and human sciences, in which case yes, they can be tested in a laboratory. Behavioural science does exist! Anyone can be bought.... exactly. So you need peer-review as a back-up. Oh... that exists too! Now if you consider that they've all been bought, you have more faith in humanity than I do: I just don't see how all scientists from all countries could be bought. It would be a good sign... one which would render all conflict a thing of the past... By the way, some research is not funded at all.
    1
  1306. Or British....
    1
  1307. Why do you feel you have to deliberately misquote him and cut the sentence before the end? Very dishonest of you. Discredits automatically any argument you may have. Luckily though, you don't have any argument, which is why you resort to such childish behaviour. Couldn't even be bothered to reply to all the people who replied to you.... pathetic.
    1
  1308.  @johnkerr99  By inserting population in brackets you misquote. He is absolutely not referring to population, but population increase. He says that at the end of the sentence that you chose to cut. When he talks about the one wish he could have (around 17:25), he is not referring to vaccines; he just mentions that even that is not his biggest wish. You strung the two bits together to make it sound like he does. Dishonest of you. You responded to no comments for three months, then two in the same day. Not youtube censorship, I think. A reaction to me calling you out. Again, dishonest of you.
    1
  1309. ​ @johnkerr99  "Most people" know what he is talking about and therefore have not posted comments. Millions have not interpreted like you. You quoted dishonestly because you cut the last bit of the sentence, the "but there we see an increase of about 1.3". You detailed everything up til then.... and then stopped conveniently. Why not finish the equation, where he gets to "C" and says it will be the key element? It really is just simple logic and simple algebra. He says himself that one of the elements needs to be pretty close to zero.... which is "C". Innovating to zero, remember? Title of the talk. Funny how this time you put it in, but not at first. So that is simple logic. 6.8 going up to 9 is an increase, so doesn't bring us any closer to zero. That's exactly what has happened ten years later: we're now at 7.8 billion, so he was right; the population is still increasing.It is dishonest to painstakingly give a detailed time line up to a point and then stop before the end... where all the important part is. You said " One Wish: "... if I could pick a vaccine, which is something I love." Why did you say that? You strung together two things without mentioning that the one wish is not vaccines.It is dishonest to do that, because you know many people will just believe you because it looks detailed (he gives the timeline so it must be true!). Same principle as videos with shock titles but no actual content. Many people don't read beyond headlines. So yes, I call that dishonest. Basically, the only thing you're basing your view on is the Corbett Report, right? That guy is just joining dots that don't necessarily have any reason to be joined. He uses the same tactic of half quotes, leaving out important parts, citing other articles as sources... and is making himself plenty of money with all this. By the way, it's called "Meet Bill Gates".
    1
  1310.  @johnkerr99  With regard to the tetanus story, you need to go further than just citing the Corbett Report again. What information does he have on the subject? Give us a direct link to something. Here's one for you, with all the explanatory links included in the article: https://africacheck.org/fbcheck/25-years-on-rumour-by-us-anti-contraceptive-organisation-still-damages-tetanus-vaccine-programmes/ It got "little international exposure for obvious reasons"... yeah, because it was wrong. "Certain community members" were, surprise surprise, the Catholic church. Not exactly renowned for their critical thinking or scientific knowledge. "Mainstream media" didn't cover anything up. The laboratories that tested the samples said they wished they'd been told they were blood samples, because that changes completely the interpretation of the results.
    1
  1311.  @godislove9548  Here's how you slow population growth: Bill Gates explains concept : does saving more lives lead to overpopulation ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obRG-2jurz0 If you don't want to hear it from him, try this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition#Stage_three
    1
  1312.  @johnkerr99  It is of no importance who funds them. What is important is the sources cited in the article.
    1
  1313.  @johnkerr99  I get your point about funding... but of course everything will be interpreted that way if you decide to. Any information I come up with will be dismissed as paid by Gates, so obviously I can't convince you of anything. Have you checked out the links included in the Africacheck article? As I said, it's the information that counts. He does not own all media, whether it be in the US or anywhere else in the world. Do you have anything to back up the idea that he pays off everyone? I didn't grow up believing in him, which is why I'm not a Microsoft fan and use Linux on my computer. I'm just responding to strange claims which every time I look into them, are backed up by hot air. I don't use fact checking sites as my only research tool, although they are useful for the links they provide. Where exactly is the big money to be made from vaccines rather than treatments?
    1
  1314.  @johnkerr99  I think there's two ways of seeing the world; the light side and the dark. You seem to consider every single act as being malignant. I think that humanity struggles on as it can, dealing with conflicting ideas and philosophies etc. When I see that event 201 exercise (great link by the way thanks for that one), I'm nodding in agreement with most of what's being said. They pretty much all agreed that control was a bad idea, it was better to get the truth out as widely as possible. Social media is indeed saturated with utter garbage because absolutely anyone can post absolutely anything. So why is saturating with real info worse than what's happening now?
    1
  1315.  @johnkerr99  I almost forgot to respond to the last question. It's hard to know what to think about that one: he promotes GMO farming because he believes it's more productive. The scientific community seem pretty divided on that one, and I'm no expert so if they're divided I think it must be a pretty grey area. Maybe it depends where, or maybe pretty much anything. Permaculture is great here in our cozy gardens, but can it feed the starving in Sub-Saharan Africa? That's the extreme, if you like, but the same applies to organic. If it really works people will convert, but it's not the same environment here (France in my case) as in Africa.
    1
  1316.  @johnkerr99  How does "Big Pharma" put pressure on Zuckerberg, someone who has more wealth, power, and influence individually than a whole industry?
    1
  1317.  @johnkerr99  Ok for the point on Zuckerberg. Strange though how everyone criticises Bill Gates for his level of control in the WHO, but now you show me that Monsanto and the WHO are in conflict. From the Global Research article: "However, on 20 March the World Health Organisation reached a decision that strikes at the heart of the company. The WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) said that glyphosate was “classified as probably carcinogenic to humans.” This is just one step below the risk designation of “known carcinogen.” Isn't that evidence that just funding something doesn't necessarily make you control it? Even if you take into account that pretty much anything is considered as a "probable carcinogen", including coffee, for example. You seem to reduce the whole argument now to one of media control, so conveniently permitting you to ignore whether there's evidence or not for an occurrence (such as sterilisation with tetanus jabs). If money was really the only driving force, I wonder why homeopathy does not take an even bigger part of the market. After all, it's just sugar and water, so should theoretically be the most profitable "drug" possible. It already holds too big a place in my opinion anyway, but should be a real goldmine... As for the "coincidence" of Event201 being a month before the outbreak, that seems to me as exactly that; coincidence. If it was one year before, or one week, people would say the same thing. The signs have been there for years, it was time to do something. Why consider it suspicious and not lucky? If there was no exercise people would say it was inadmissible to not have done a drill, proof that THEY want to reduce population! Like I said, I go along with what was said, because there's so much stupidity on social media that it is a real concern and has real effects on lives. They were saying that "control" is not good, but that the information needs to get out. What's wrong with that? If you've got some religious nuts saying that Gates is the Antichrist and nobody should be vaccinated against anything, than yes, they need to be called out.
    1
  1318.  @johnkerr99  I do get your points, but like I said, I think there would be more money to be gained with expensive treatments. Your article talks of the cases of illness, and even death.... but in such insignificant numbers (insignificant on a statistical level, not a human one) as to be almost negligible. As I've said since the beginning, vaccines aren't perfect, more research should always be done to make them safer, but in the meantime weigh up the pros and cons. 800 victims across Europe; that's next to nothing. One death... even closer to nothing. Very sad for the people in question, but you have to look on a statistical level. I'm not saying "so what?" I'm just saying "could do better". Funny how all this has completely deviated from the original points that I contested.
    1
  1319.  @CharlotteErika  It's not control. Slowing down population growth is just a handy side-effect of improving living conditions. Where's the genocide?
    1
  1320. Now if everybody starts using capital letters everywhere, we'll never get anywhere. What's next, big bold italic print?
    1
  1321. Well, if you went to see them in the first place you probably weren't in perfect health...
    1
  1322.  @mrtyr0468  je c'est que ses "sais", mé passé cille te plaie!
    1
  1323.  @mrtyr0468  sa, je le ça-vais!
    1
  1324. Careful: even you are misquoting him! He says - "Now the world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 %, but there we see an increase of about 1.3." Don't make the same mistake as nearly everyone here!! He never says "we could lower the population by 10-15%".
    1
  1325. Quand on parle de l'homme chasseur, on parle du préhistoire. Pas trop de fusils à l'époque. C'est ça qui a changé et qui fait que les femmes font beaucoup de travail réservé de fait aux hommes auparavant. Exemple: chauffeur de bus ou camion: beaucoup plus accessible depuis le assistance au volant!
    1
  1326.  @JimBobJourneyer  Evolution is a slow process
    1
  1327.  @CovertRadio  Please check out my recent post a bit further down "My predicted conversation with any conspiracy theorist"
    1
  1328. La cadreuse n'est pas là pour écouter.
    1
  1329.  @LM-xj6oi  Elle fait ça mieux que le cadrage...
    1
  1330. Are we sure that's not just an expression, like "backing you into a corner" doesn't literally mean being backed into a corner...?
    1
  1331.  @ThePlugTurtle  Just wondering, since I'm not American. We don't even say closet!
    1
  1332.  @ThePlugTurtle  If people come out of the closet..... does it mean someone shoved them in there in the first place?!
    1
  1333.  @runner399  Where are your links to substantiate your claims?
    1
  1334. @Noartist Some catholics want him out of Africa...
    1
  1335. @Noartist You're getting it all mixed up:it's not "black people" that don't want him in Africa, it's some catholics. He doesn't want to depopulate the world; never does he say it, and everything he does say contradicts that idea. We're coming out of an ICe Age, so global warming is very real. The rate of warming, and the effects it may have on different zones a re still debatable, but we're already seeing the effects in some places. I'd be really very very surprised if the global scientific community had got together and decided to create an elaborate hoax, getting everyone to go along with it, from North Korea to America to China to Russia... As for the double-entendres; you'll hear them anywhere if you really want to. I bet if you play Stairway to Heaven backwards you'll hear "Bill Gates is Satan" somewhere, if you listen hard enough.
    1
  1336. You 're a woman, not a women, aren't you?
    1
  1337.  @heshe2  Mais... elles l'ont maintenant. Alors c'est quoi le problème?
    1
  1338. Alors qu'est ce qu'il a dit qui n'est pas vrai? Je pose la question parce que je ne maîtrise pas le sujet...
    1
  1339.  @a.n.6970  Pas de réponse alors, troll de niveau CM1?
    1
  1340. C'est quand qu'il a dit qu'il fallait supprimer des millions de personnes? Source, svp.
    1
  1341. Pour rentrer dans une boite de nuit il faut: ...être une fille. Bizarre, mais les féministes ne parlent jamais de ça....
    1
  1342.  @ianmcdonald8648  Rather than being bandaids, vaccines are more like helmets, knee and elbow pads: prevention. Protective gear costs less than lengthy hospital treatment.... so the profit argument sort of goes out the window.
    1
  1343.  @ianmcdonald8648  Ok so you don't want to respond to my logic. AS for vaccine ingredients, I know as much as anyone can know without being one of the experts analysing or creating them. It's easily available information: https://vk.ovg.ox.ac.uk/vk/vaccine-ingredients https://www.vaccines.gov/basics/vaccine_ingredients https://www.publichealth.org/public-awareness/understanding-vaccines/goes-vaccine/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_vaccine_ingredients ... to list but a few. If you consider all that to be "mainstream lies", I'd like to know what sources you have that are so much more reliable? Do doctors give a detailed account of what's in them and their side effects? No more or less than for any other medication. I think that probably depends on the doctor how much they explain. On any medicine there's a lengthy list of possible side effects. Part of the reason for that is to cover themselves in all eventualities. It's a bit like the "may contain traces of peanut" you find marked on foods where you wonder how on earth peanuts could've got in there! So now please reply to my question; why immunise people with vaccines if you make money out of them being sick?
    1
  1344.  @aurelor8133  je propose l'investissement dans les services de santé. Tout ça on nous dit est parce que les hôpitaux étaient saturés et risquaient de l’être une deuxième fois. Plutôt que de mettre des sommes astronomiques (qu'il va falloir récupérer avec encore et toujours des mesures d’austérité) dans la compensation des gens qui ne peuvent pas travailler, il faut donner des moyens aux hôpitaux de faire face. Si les hôpitaux pouvaient gérer l'influx de malades, il n'y aura aucun besoin de confinement.Sachant que le risque des pandémies ne fait que grandir, il me semble que celle-ci est la seule solution raisonnable. Je ne vois pas ce gouvernement (ni beaucoup d'autres avant) investir suffisamment (et je mesure mes mots!) dans les services de santé. Ça coûtera beaucoup moins à long terme pour nous, l'état, pour tout le monde. J'attends d'entendre un politicien dire pourquoi on ne le fait pas...
    1
  1345.  @DonErikos  Quel bon excuse. Depuis le début de cette pandémie il s'est écroulé bien plus d'un mois. Même si c'est trop tard (mais c'est jamais trop tard pour faire une différence) pour cette fois-ci, qu'est ce qu'on attend pour se préparer pour la prochaine? On sait pourtant qu'il y a de plus en plus de risque de pandémie. Je ne vois actuellement aucun investissement en plus, dans un secteur qu'on sait est d'une importance primordiale. Alors les excuses de "oui mais c'est trop tard on n'a pas le temps" ne tiennent pas.
    1
  1346.  @aurelor8133  Confinement uniquement de gens "à risque", pour commencer. Il est inutile de confiner des gens qui sont en bonne santé, qui ne risquent pas de rencontrer et contaminer des vieux dans des ephads. Inutile de confiner des gens pendant que d'autres se serrent dans les métros. Inutile de fermer des restaurants pendant que les enfants sont tous à l'école... inutile d’empêcher des gens d'aller nager dans l'océan, inutile de.... je pourrai continuer, mais tu me comprends! Encore je dis, oui, c'est une solution long terme améliorer les services de santé.... mais rien n'a bougé depuis Janvier, alors que on sait ce qu'il faut faire. Si le gouvernement ne prend pas de mesures dans ce sens, j'attends toujours de savoir pourquoi. Les mesures sur le long terme devraient avoir commencé déjà. On nous dit toujours la même chose: "oui mais ça c'est pour plus tard...qu'est ce qu'on fait maintenant?" Et bien, maintenant on prévoit pour plus tard!! Les Chinois ont monté des hôpitaux en dix jours, alors que nous on a monté deux tentes de l'armée et donné des médailles et des bons vacances (mais pas de vacances) aux soignants qui ne demandaient que des moyens. S'il manque d'affectifs en France, je suis certain que il y en a qui viendraient travailler ici sans souci...
    1
  1347. Fancy some popcorn?
    1
  1348. Evan, you need to listen again you've got it all upside down.
    1
  1349.  @EvanEscher  Yeah, he uses a bizarre sentence structure... but the context gives all the information needed. Some just won't listen to the end of the phrase, many have misquoted, which adds to the confusion. As you've just done; by quoting only part of the sentence you distort the meaning.
    1
  1350. How so?
    1
  1351. Misquote. Deliberate lying or just lazy ?
    1
  1352. Actual words: "Now the world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 %, but there we see an increase of about 1.3."
    1
  1353.  @starseed96  Whatever some people may say about snopes, the important part is the sources that are quoted. Snopes give sources.
    1
  1354. That would require intelligence...
    1
  1355. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwHJL5X97Do See? It happens.
    1
  1356. Why do you think he didn't? Do you have a source for that information?
    1
  1357.  @nassernathan  Can't find anything on that. Are you talking about the tetanus vaccine sterilisation myth? That was debunked ages ago. Here's a quick summary: https://africacheck.org/fbcheck/25-years-on-rumour-by-us-anti-contraceptive-organisation-still-damages-tetanus-vaccine-programmes/
    1
  1358. Tu rêves. De rien. (deux niveaux là.... c'est pas tout le monde qui va comprendre...)
    1
  1359.  Maria Salinas  Funny you should say that.... after all the conversation we've had, do you understand what I've been saying to you? No girl is complaining about men being sexualised... because it's just normal! Men sexualise women, women sexualise men. Each in their own way, sure, but they both do it. That's kind of why men and women exist. If everyone can just realise that and accept it, there'd be less problems. Stop pretending that how you dress does not have an effect on others.
    1
  1360.  Maria Salinas  It seems your replies are getting deleted, but I got ""joe public men sexualize wimen and women men yes..but men sexualized women way too much and women don’t like to be sexualized by every fucking step they " What I've been trying to say, is that just because women don't like it doesn't mean it will magically go away. I could easily say men don't like to NOT sexualise women.... should you be forced to comply? No. All you can do is accept the other for what they are. Again, as I've already said, there's a difference between glancing/thinking and catcalling/groping. If you can understand a glance and deal with it (difficult to establish a limit, but glance does not equal stare), everyone lives fine. Protesting that men are being men won't get you anywhere apart from being permanently angry. This is not to say that excessive sexualising can not happen, as in some of the cases given here (especially Lola bunny, I'd say).
    1
  1361.  Maria Salinas  " "joe public you said that normalizing being more naked and such,makes us more equal and desexualizes us"" Definitely. Big difference though between total nudity and partial. It's clothes that do an awful lot of the sexualising I think. What is covered is mysterious and therefore something you can wish to see/ fantasize about. This can be as much pure curiousity as sexual interest. Anything that brings attention to the body basically: jewellery included. Difficult to define a limit between sexual and sensual also... A friend of mine told me about the naturist beaches in the seventies, and how he saw it change from being naked hippies in family, to women in high heels with gold chains and men with medallions! A very different view of nudity...
    1
  1362. "regurgitating old footage from their other channels" sounds absolutely disgusting, given the pornographic context of this comments section.
    1
  1363. Typical old fogey. Created the millenials then complain about them!
    1
  1364. It was Aristotle (or maybe Mohammed Ali) who said "You can understand some of the people some of the time, all of the people some of the time, but Trump supporters obviously can't understand anything". FACT. # Do yOuR oWn ResAreCh!
    1
  1365. Welcome to Britain!
    1
  1366. What do you mean by "anymore"? This was ten years ago, you do realise that? What do you mean by reduce world population"? He does not say that. He talks about reducing the rate of increase? Proof: the population has grown by a billion since this talk. This is therefore not reduction of population, or if it is, it's being done very, very badly!
    1
  1367.  @futhark3899  To which I could reply: do as I tell you. That's conservatives for you... which would be just as silly a broad generalisation.
    1
  1368. THEY are! And WHO are THEY? THEM!
    1
  1369. Guess what? I've got a fever (COVID 19 probably), and the only prescription is.... more cowbell!
    1
  1370. @Internet surfer It's called French.
    1
  1371.  Claudio VIT  Pourquoi dire ça? Si les gouvernements ne font rien, il faut bien que quelqu'un le fasse...
    1
  1372. Yep. That's about it. Funny isn't it?! Reminds me of Louis CK and the "N word" sketch.
    1
  1373. He does NOT propose that the population should or could be lowered. He DOES mention the technology factor. You obviously missed half the equation: CO2 = P x S x E x C P= people S= services per person E= energy per service C = carbon dioxide per unit energy The last one, C, must come down to zero because all the others will increase, even if you slow down the rate of increase. "Innovating to zero" = creating alternative energy sources that do not produce CO2. Simple maths: anything x anything x anything x zero = zero. The "technology factor " you mentioned is exactly that: the "C" in the equation, because it's how you produce the energy required. "Innovation" refers to technology.
    1
  1374. Can you show me these "multiple publications" that show "his GMO's were actually DESIGNED to produce LOWER AMOUNTS OF OXYGEN"?
    1
  1375. "They ALL didn't get that: 15% of them needs to go away with Bills vaccines and health care system!" Or maybe THEY all got it and YOU didn't?
    1
  1376. Yeah well.... Mars is bigger; more parking space. We didn't have rear view cameras and detectors that go beep when there's an obstacle behind you in the sixties.
    1
  1377. lmao! Thanks for an enlightened comment! Yeah, the Sun, the "newspaper" that gave a whole generation half naked 18 year olds on the breakfast table every morning. "barely legal, and what a bit of crumpet! Corrr!"
    1
  1378. God this is fascinating...
    1
  1379. While you're hanging around on youtube...
    1
  1380. You're missing everything. Improving living conditions (healthcare, contraception, vaccines, infrastructure etc) slows down population growth a bit. This changes very little in terms of CO2 emissions. That's why he skips on to the next bit of the equation. Innovating to zero (surprise surprise; it's the title) is the concept of using alternative energy sources to maintain the high level of comfort that we're used to, and that developing countries aspire to (that's the services he refers to). If you have energy sources that don't produce CO2, you can reduce the EXCESS quantities of CO2 produced by human industrial activity. So the part of the equation that needs to be close to zero is the last one; the CO2 emissions from industry.
    1
  1381. Hasn't anyone called her Ellen Degenerate yet?
    1
  1382. Not everyone, judging by the comments!
    1
  1383.  @helostruk3953  Alors comme ça les femmes doivent pouvoir s'habiller comme elles veulent partout? Dans ce cas là, les hommes aussi. En réalité, ce n'est pas le cas: à chaque type de lieu son type de code vestimentaire. Plage, boite de nuit, gymnase, ne sont pas pareil que école, salle de réunion etc. On ne verra pas des garçons venir à l'école en crop top.... On ne verra pas en salle de réunion le boss en cycliste et veste sans manches... donc pas besoin d'imposer des règles. En principe, quasi partout ou il y a un uniforme imposé (police, armée, McDo, RATP etc etc, les filles ont le choix de jupe ou pantalon, mais les garçons n'ont pas de choix. (exemple RATP l'année dernière je ne sais plus ou: les hommes ont manifesté en portant des jupes parce que le short leur était interdit en été, alors que les femmes pouvaient porter des jupes).
    1
  1384.  @TheCourtsOfLove  " xin wei Koh xin wei Koh il y a 1 jour @Mithras 3851 you're dumb too " "Mithras 3851 Mithras 3851 il y a 23 heures @xin wei Koh - cough at least I know English. " What's wrong with his English? Did you think he'd write "your dumb to"? Seems perfect English to me... I agree about the second amendment though.
    1
  1385.  @TheCourtsOfLove  Oh, just for the record, while I think of it: you don't put a capital letter on "glad" because it's inside the brackets and therefore included in the sentence. You don't put a full stop inside the brackets. You don't start a sentence by "and". Before giving others lectures about punctuation, try learning a little about it yourself. Have a nice day!
    1
  1386.  Tennessee Country  We're coming after your guns....just like we came after your cars...
    1
  1387.  @TheCourtsOfLove  Clearly, we have equal quantities of life... "You showed the evidence and no you didn't." Hmm... nope: you've got me there, I've got no idea what that means. "And since when did Americans care for other peoples culture?" I've got no idea who that should be addressed to, but I never mentioned that... "So the big tantrum paragraph you felt so desperately to write" Well, if you consider 15 lines to be a big paragraph, you've exceeded it yourself. You:"And you didn't use word punctuation no. " Me: "Before giving others lectures about punctuation, try learning a little about it yourself." "You've told me this was to draw my attention to my comment - so you admit I was right about grammar". No. You were right about punctuation. The grammar is debatable. "that you, the man-child that you are took too seriously" Strange, I thought it was you that came up with the A-B-C point by point comment? "but if you are going to make a statement to me it'd have to be good enough to be valid in grammar." Erm.... yeah right; that probably means something. "Thank you, Good day, Adios, Ciao." Why did you then add another comment 15 min later? Not that I'm complaining... just try at least to be consistent! :)
    1
  1388.  @shortymcshort1375  Ok I'll check them out thanks; I didn't know either of those names.
    1
  1389.    he must've meant "stick to the scriptures": nothing outside of the Bible counts for these religious fanatics!
    1
  1390. Yeah it's one sided.... it's humour, not journalism..... or can't you take a joke?
    1
  1391. pastel--->wardrobe--->yellow submarine--->bicarbonate of soda? See, I can talk nonsense too!
    1
  1392.  @whitetiger3697  "google est ton ami" : autrement dit "en fait non, je n'ai pas de source à proposer, alors je fais semblant d'avoir la flemme."
    1
  1393.  Rogier -  How so? The death rate isn't exactly extraordinary, is it? If the idea was to kill us with vaccines, then why not put the killer ingredient in any vaccine that we already have?
    1
  1394.  Rogier -  Half of what you say is true; it's by improving health etc that people end up having less children. When you go on about him sacrificing one of his children it just gets ridiculous.
    1
  1395. Why do conspiracy theorists always use the same stock phrase "wake up sheeple", in it's varied forms? Isn't it exactly the herd mentality they're trying to call out?
    1
  1396. Because you don't necessarily behave rationally when threatened, if you've had no training to cope with such situations (as the police have, or should have). Maybe when you're surrounded by cops with guns you sort of panic a little bit...
    1
  1397. Go and hang around behind Lidl at night..... you'll soon find out!
    1
  1398. "waiting for his come back"...... why does that sound the way it does?! Give him consent, and you'll get his come back!
    1
  1399. C'est là le souci: comment les hommes reprendraient le pouvoir (si déjà ils l'avaient)? On a l'égalité d'opportunité, on a légalité des salaires....
    1
  1400. encircling a guy and all shooting at him is just bad training? What would you class as trigger-happy then?
    1
  1401.  @mayamaya-kn8mk  Sigh...... You literally didn't understand a word he said, did you?
    1
  1402.  @mayamaya-kn8mk  "Now the world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 %, but there we see an increase of about 1.3." He's talking about the rate of increase.
    1
  1403.  @mayamaya-kn8mk  Sigh.... ok, if you like, Karen.
    1
  1404.  @Simbadagreat13  Good . Glad you understand that concept. Now strangely enough, that's actually what Bill Gates is saying too.
    1
  1405. Who?
    1
  1406.  @save_oursouls_7039  Erm.... don't you know how vaccines work? They require a fully functioning immune system...... just saying.
    1
  1407. That sort of sums up the general level here: people can't even tell the difference between a fictional character and a real one!
    1
  1408. Does this mean that you think we should all stay stuck in our traditional clothes/styles forever?
    1
  1409.  @Papi_Luis2001  Yeah he has a lot of influence but that's nothing to do with predicting pandemics. A lot of these conspiracy theories are spread by catholics, who hate Bill Gates because he's pro-contraception for a start. More ended up hating him because of a sterility scare with vaccines in Africa (which was debunked long ago but persisted in the catholic community).
    1
  1410.  @rustyshackleford7265  If you're busy, get off of youtube. Like I said, if you make a claim it's on you to prove it, nobody else. Try learning how to use youtube, everyone else manages fine.... probably because of the concept of sharing knowledge. Have a nice day, don't forget to rest, after all that busy hanging around on youtube!
    1
  1411.  @rustyshackleford7265  By the way, to find out how to hotlink on your youtube app, try googling "how to hotlink on youtube app": You could have done it by now, with a sense of accomplishment knowing you did it all by yourself! (Weird.... I find myself saying those words but they sound somehow familiar....)
    1
  1412.  @rustyshackleford7265  Yeah right, whatever. Jog on.
    1
  1413. Try going to visit a hospital and hanging round people who have got it. That's how some medical staff have died.
    1
  1414. Nope. We're two of them!
    1
  1415.  @ffxivonline5864  source?
    1
  1416. On polio vaccines in India : Correlation between Non-Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis Rates with Pulse Polio Frequency in India https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121585/pdf/ijerph-15-01755.pdf Brief extract of the conclusions : "5. Conclusions The polio eradication programme succeeded in drastically reducing the global spread of this disease, which was achieved through the use of immunization with OPV. While commending this enormous effort at eradication, our observation supports the hypothesis that the frequency of pulse polio administration is directly or indirectly related to the incidence of NPAFP. It is hoped that this finding will help continue efforts at optimizing the dose schedule of OPV administration and result in a reduction in NPAFP—which is a feasible hope, as the incidence of wild polio is currently at an all-time low." And this one, explaining why the vaccine causes more cases now of polio than the natural strain : Mutant Strains Of Polio Vaccine Now Cause More Paralysis Than Wild Polio https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/06/28/534403083/mutant-strains-of-polio-vaccine-now-cause-more-paralysis-than-wild-polio "That eradication effort has been incredibly successful. In 1988, when the campaign began, there were 350,000 cases of polio around the world each year compared with the six so far this year. Zaffran credits the oral polio vaccine with getting the world incredibly close to wiping out a terrible disease. "Four regions of the world have totally eradicated the disease with the use of the oral polio vaccine," he notes. "Of course we need to recognize that there have been a few cases of children paralyzed because of the vaccine virus, which is regrettable. But, you know, from a public health perspective, the benefits far outweigh the risk." This one, with regards to malaria: First Results of Phase 3 Trial of RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine in African Children https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1102287 "Conclusions The RTS,S/AS01 vaccine provided protection against both clinical and severe malaria in African children. " "A malaria vaccine, deployed in combination with current malaria-control tools, could play an important role in future control and eventual elimination of malaria in Africa." Tetanus and fertility in Africa: https://africacheck.org/fbcheck/25-years-on-rumour-by-us-anti-contraceptive-organisation-still-damages-tetanus-vaccine-programmes/ Other stuff Bill Gates was not chucked out of India : press release from Indian government : (the direct link to this no longer works, because it looks like they've archived it, but it's still accessible) click on the Press Information Bureau link: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetail.aspx?PRID=1568914 Then write in the date on the left: 8 february 2017, then scroll down underneath through all the other press releases of the day until you get to "press note". It's all in alphabetical order, so easy to find. You will then see on the main window the complete press note. Here's an extract from the end: "Some media reports have suggested that all health related collaboration with the Gates Foundation with National Health Mission (NHM) has been stopped. This is inaccurate and misleading. BMGF continues to collaborate and support the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare." Sorry the direct link doesn't work anymore, but at least you can get to it eventually if you want to check.
    1
  1417. But unlike Nostradamus he had experts to consult. This explains why they came true.
    1
  1418. What is?
    1
  1419. Why's that then?
    1
  1420. Curable disease kills more people than famine or malnutrition: https://ourworldindata.org/causes-of-death So if you want to save the maximum of lives quickly, you fund health.
    1
  1421. They need to focus more on the women; they're always blurred "down there"!
    1