Youtube hearted comments of (@EbenBransome).
-
460
-
75
-
70
-
50
-
38
-
22
-
19
-
15
-
15
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
I suspect a lot of it depends on where you live. If there are plenty of charging points, you have a driveway, and solar panels, it's a no-brainer. If you live in a terrace with on street parking only, street chargers that deliver about 1.4kW and you have to visit a fast charge station frequently, not a good idea. Most people are not electrical engineers and didn't understand that.
Back in the 2000s boom, a lot of people bought narrowboats. They seemed to imagine they were a kind of water caravan. A lot of them lost a lot of money then, too, along with the people who bought RVs. We had an office near a place that sold them, and they were sitting in the yard in some cases for years with the asking price slowly dropping. The yard wasn't run by idiots; they didn't buy them in, they hired out a yard space to the owners. Falling prices didn't worry them.
There's lots of status obsessed mugs.
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
In the escalating runup to WW3 it is important to get the steps right. An ICBM has a range over 5000km and usually has multiple warheads. The ATACMS supplied by the US is a short range missile which releases cluster bombs, effectively a minelayer. The Russian IRBM is intermediate range, fast and ballistic (from Gk. ballein, to throw) i.e. unguided till it slows and aims close to the target. The Iranians have similar weapons and so too, we assume, does Israel. The US tends to depend on overwhelming firepower and reducing the target to a big hole, which has been their tactical approach since about 1917.
So you can read it like this:
ATACMS attack - see, we can cause destruction and deny areas inside Russia and our mobile platform means you can't stop us. And we have bigger, longer range drones than the ones we've been using to disrupt you.
Russian response - well, we have a precision missile beyond the range of your ATACMS, so if you don't want holes in Kiev, think again.
And by the way we laugh at your crappy Watchkeepers.
In the arithmetic of death and destruction it's perfectly rational, a kind of chess game.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In Purgatorio, Canto 16, Dante discusses good and bad government. His character says:
"Onde convenne legge per fren porre;
convenne rege aver, che discernesse
de la vera cittade almen la torre."
Therefore the laws were needed as a brake (i.e. curb on bad men)
And there is need of a king who can at least make out the tower of the True City."
Trump, Vance and Musk reject and ignore the laws, and have no higher goal in mind than their own power and wealth.
If Vance is correct in saying that Europe has not invested enough in its security, he is saying it for the wrong reason: because we are in this situation due to the US attempt to take over the world, starting in 1990, and using Europe as a tool. Without NATO in the post-1990 era, without the US bases, Europe could have Europeanised Russia, to the benefit of everybody but with a great relative reduction in US power.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
None of these are EVs I would ever consider buying, they all have some major downside that keeps them off the list. Air cooled batteries (obsolete tech), high price for a brand that your fellow bankers won't recognise, or one just not associated with expensive cars. And then there are things like the Taycan or the Q8, bought by people who usually obsess over noise, or capacity of the engine, or position on a model pecking order. In my experience there are three basic types of Porsche buyer: the German who does high Autobahn mileage (one guy I encountered was commuting 50 000 miles a year), the engineer, and the status freak. The first group won't buy a Taycan because it doesn't do what they need, the second group won't because they can't maintain it themselves, and the third group live in a world in which all their friends sneer at EVs anyway. That leaves the people with lots of money who buy one for the experience and then discover that once you've played with all the bits it just becomes normal. And those people don't buy second hand.
I did see a 2015 Leaf on the road this morning but most of it was Hyundais, MGs, BMWs and the odd Mokka, with one Model 3 from 2019. All practical company cars.
1
-
1
-
Surely the point is that neither Badenoch nor Farage have ever achieved anything remotely positive in their pointless, narcissistic existences?
And that really is the key metric of the far right: all negativity.
When did the Conservative Party last have a leader who had done more than move money for people, write columns or make speeches?
Heath had perhaps the most distinguished record of any postwar PM other than Churchill - an early anti-Nazi, anti-Fascist, artillery officer in WW2, musician and sailor with friends in other parties, who stood up to Farage's predecessor Powell, but was sabotaged by the unions.
Thatcher reportedly helped put the air in Mr. Whippy, and sensibly married an oil multi-millionaire to further her career.
Major was decent enough and did his best over Europe and the economy, only to be sabotaged by the likes of Deadwood and Bonehead.
The party preferred - just - PR man Cameron over David Davis who actually was successful in business before going into politics.
They then had the nonentity May, the featherweight Johnson, the disastrous Truss and the unreal-economy Sunak.
And without having remotely learned the lesson, they chose Badenoch who had risen without trace like Truss.
Is it deathwish? In this case electing a puppet so the corruption can proceed unchanged doesn't apply as she isn't PM.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Conservative problem is the same as the Republican problem - the headbangers drove out all the sensible people and now they have nobody who understands how to unite rather than divide.
They preferred David Davis over Cameron not realising Cameron would run the government with a very small Etonian clique (and a couple of oiks like Osborne).
They eliminated Stewart and Tugendhat, both of whom would have been "safe pairs of hands."
In the past they have chosen Hague, IDS, May, Johnson, Truss ffs, and then a banking apparatchik.
In about 1970 I was asked if I wanted to join the Young Conservatives. I said that I really didn't want to get into student politics. "Oh", they said, "we don't do politics. No ideologies here." And that is the lesson the new Cons, with their two right wings, have forgotten.
1
-
1
-
1