Comments by "Yerris" (@yerri5567) on "Hongkongers urged to stop panic buying salt" video.
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
If you cant do it then YOURE the one "barking loudly".
"Remind you, JPN is only a country in Asia in suppying drinking water through taps upon clarification device"
Irrelevant. Also, "clarification" means to make something more understanding. And a "device" is typically small. You are speaking about a massive water treatment system.
Moreover, Japan is one of the most mountainous country by % area that has rain. That means the country can capture a lot of rainwater for its population. Japans water doesnt have to be heavily treated compared to the rest of the world.
"The treated water excluding contaminants is now discharging under the quantity control per day and it continues over 30 yeard, not at once or ASAP"
That only means one thing, its obviously NOT safe thats why they have to discharge it over such a longer time period.
But that doesnt change anything. The worlds ocean will still be contaminated by the same radioactive waste waster after 30 years. Youre just delaying the inevitable.
"You can never tell the causal relationship between Sonoda's death and what he drank the treated water over 10 years ago."
Oh? Then Japan can "prove" to the world again by having their ministers drink the water and monitor their health.
His death was obviously because of the radioactive water. Stop trying to defend this nonsense.
All in all, you can talk about the contaminated water being "purified" all you want, but the fact of the matter is that this situation is unprecedented. That has been no comprehensive study on nuclear waste water on the biological or marine environment whatsoever. Literally none. Zip. Zilch. Zero.
Theres only studies that it DOES cause problems.
When there is ZERO evidence to ensure that theres NO problem, then ANY country or organisation saying its "safe" is questionable. Its doubtful, unreliable and unconfirmed. Take it with a grain of salt, not as the ultimate truth.
And Ill say it again, if its so-called "safe" then you should dump in your own country. Use it as farm water or whatever. Bet you wont even dare.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jeanmiyu6904 "That's a typical Chinese propaganda. You shamelessly spread it without touching the key points"
Many people AROUND THE WORLD say so, but somehow to you you decide to cherry pick and say its cHiNeSe pRoPaGaNdA. Your words are literally anti-China propaganda.
And what "key points" am I meant to touch on? I already said Im no scientist. I literally just said they only speak about tritium while ignoring the other isotopes. And that Western media has been completely silent on this issue.
"You, Chinese can't drink tap water without boiling or putting some filter...Barking loudly without checking the facts...Chinese's childish acts never changes since the old days"
Who the fk said Im Chinese? Dont assume. And dont get personal with me by speaking in such a condescending manner. Quote me were I supposedly "barked loudly". Come on, do it! If you cant do it then YOURE the one "barking loudly".
"Remind you, JPN is only a country in Asia in suppying drinking water through taps upon clarification device"
Irrelevant. Also, "clarification" means to make something more understanding. And a "device" is typically small. You are speaking about a massive water treatment system.
Moreover, Japan is one of the most mountainous country by % area that has rain. That means the country can capture a lot of rainwater for its population. Japans water doesnt have to be heavily treated compared to the rest of the world.
"The treated water excluding contaminants is now discharging under the quantity control per day and it continues over 30 yeard, not at once or ASAP"
That only means one thing, its obviously NOT safe thats why they have to discharge it over such a longer time period.
But that doesnt change anything. The worlds ocean will still be contaminated by the same radioactive waste waster after 30 years. Youre just delaying the inevitable.
"You can never tell the causal relationship between Sonoda's death and what he drank the treated water over 10 years ago."
Oh? Then Japan can "prove" to the world again by having their ministers drink the water and monitor their health.
His death was obviously because of the radioactive water. Stop trying to defend this nonsense.
All in all, you can talk about the contaminated water being "purified" all you want, but the fact of the matter is that this situation is unprecedented. That has been no comprehensive study on nuclear waste water on the biological or marine environment whatsoever. Literally none. Zip. Zilch. Zero.
Theres only studies that it DOES cause problems.
When there is ZERO evidence to ensure that theres NO problem, then ANY country or organisation saying its "safe" is questionable. Its doubtful, unreliable and unconfirmed. Take it with a grain of salt, not as the ultimate truth.
And Ill say it again, if its so-called "safe" then you should dump in your own country. Use it as farm water or whatever. Bet you wont even dare.
1
-
"That's a typical Chinese propaganda. You shamelessly spread it without touching the key points"
Many people AROUND THE WORLD say so, but somehow to you you decide to cherry pick and say its cHiNeSe pRoPaGaNdA. Your words are literally anti-China propaganda.
And what "key points" am I meant to touch on? I already said Im no scientist. I literally just said they only speak about tritium while ignoring the other isotopes. And that Western media has been completely silent on this issue.
"You, Chinese can't drink tap water without boiling or putting some filter...Barking loudly without checking the facts...Chinese's childish acts never changes since the old days"
Who the fk said Im Chinese? Dont assume. And dont get personal with me by speaking in such a condescending manner. Quote me were I supposedly "barked loudly". Come on, do it! If you cant do it then YOURE the one "barking loudly".
"Remind you, JPN is only a country in Asia in suppying drinking water through taps upon clarification device"
Irrelevant. Also, "clarification" means to make something more understanding. And a "device" is typically small. You are speaking about a massive water treatment system.
Moreover, Japan is one of the most mountainous country by % area that has rain. That means the country can capture a lot of rainwater for its population. Japans water doesnt have to be heavily treated compared to the rest of the world.
"The treated water excluding contaminants is now discharging under the quantity control per day and it continues over 30 yeard, not at once or ASAP"
That only means one thing, its obviously NOT safe thats why they have to discharge it over such a longer time period.
But that doesnt change anything. The worlds ocean will still be contaminated by the same radioactive waste waster after 30 years. Youre just delaying the inevitable.
"You can never tell the causal relationship between Sonoda's death and what he drank the treated water over 10 years ago."
Oh? Then Japan can "prove" to the world again by having their ministers drink the water and monitor their health.
His death was obviously because of the radioactive water. Stop trying to defend this nonsense.
All in all, you can talk about the contaminated water being "purified" all you want, but the fact of the matter is that this situation is unprecedented. That has been no comprehensive study on nuclear waste water on the biological or marine environment whatsoever. Literally none. Zip. Zilch. Zero.
Theres only studies that it DOES cause problems.
When there is ZERO evidence to ensure that theres NO problem, then ANY country or organisation saying its "safe" is questionable. Its doubtful, unreliable and unconfirmed. Take it with a grain of salt, not as the ultimate truth.
And Ill say it again, if its so-called "safe" then you should dump in your own country. Use it as farm water or whatever. Bet you wont even dare.
1
-
@abcd124 I tried searching for information on China dumping their nuclear waste water into the ocean, I found nothing on that. If you can link me a credible source that can provide that information that would be great thanks.
And as I said, the report only focuses on tritium, but conveniently ignores carbon-14, potassium-40, strontium-90, iodine-129, cesium etc. Because this situation is unprecedented, theres literally no comprehensive study on these radioactive isotopes that its "safe". Only studies that it DOES cause problems.
When there is ZERO evidence to ensure that theres NO problem, then ANY country or organisation saying its "safe" is questionable. Its doubtful, unreliable and unconfirmed. Take it with a grain of salt, not as the ultimate truth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1