Comments by "Yerris" (@yerri5567) on "These are the safest and riskiest Asian cities to visit" video.
-
18
-
@Sleepyirishcoffee Thats not the definition of a "police state". Thats all in your mind.
Police state just means the state is controlled by a police force.
Firstly, thats not true. The police is controlled by the government. Which has a set of laws they must follow. They dont have "ungodly" powers. If there were anything unjust going on, they can be sued or atleast have the responsible person fired.
Secondly, you cant just be "locked up" simply from an accusation without some sort of evidence. If anything, "detained" is the word, and that is temporary. And there must be sufficient evidence that said person is a suspect.
Lastly, "limited freedoms to do things" is subjective. People that reside in these so-called "police states" would argue they have the freedom to do whatever they wished to do. You think people that live in such a safe society would want the "freedom" to bear arms or "freedom" to speak ill about their leader? They dont even think about such things.
Some countries have "freedom" to drink or get tattoos in their early teens. If a country cant do that, does that mean they have "limited freedom"?
And you say you lived in a "police state" before. Just because that country was a "police state" and you experienced something terrible, that doesnt mean all "police states" are like that. Likewise, Im sure many people would experience terrible things in democratic countries, like police brutality etc, does that mean democratic countries are terrible?
What you dont like is corruption, not the model of governance.
3
-
Thats not the definition of a "police state". Thats all in your mind.
Police state just means the state is controlled by a police force.
Firstly, thats not true. The police is controlled by the government. Which has a set of laws they must follow. They dont have "ungodly" powers. If there were anything unjust going on, they can be sued or atleast have the responsible person fired.
Secondly, you cant just be "locked up" simply from an accusation without some sort of evidence. If anything, "detained" is the word, and that is temporary. And there must be sufficient evidence that said person is a suspect.
Lastly, "limited freedoms to do things" is subjective. People that reside in these so-called "police states" would argue they have the freedom to do whatever they wished to do. You think people that live in such a safe society would want the "freedom" to bear arms or "freedom" to speak ill about their leader? They dont even think about such things.
Some countries have "freedom" to drink or get tattoos in their early teens. If a country cant do that, does that mean they have "limited freedom"?
And you say you lived in a "police state" before. Just because that country was a "police state" and you experienced something terrible, that doesnt mean all "police states" are like that. Likewise, Im sure many people would experience terrible things in democratic countries, like police brutality etc, does that mean democratic countries are terrible?
What you dont like is corruption, not the model of governance.
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1