Comments by "Yerris" (@yerri5567) on "Taiwanese reject same-sex marriage and Olympic name change" video.

Anu Will you also support incestuous marriage? Love is love right?
2
walao eh "I don’t get why people care so much about OTHER PEOPLE getting married. Why hate on love? Love is such a great thing" Do you support marriage between siblings? Love is a great thing right?
2
@鍾益飛 Marriage equality is respect for basic human rights? Do you support incestuous marriage as well?! Or is this selective "human rights" you speak of?
1
@鍾益飛 Surely youve heard of something called condoms right? I said incestuous MARRIAGE. I didnt say anything about babies. If youre concerned about health issues. STDs are among the highest in homosexuals. Do you have any comments on that?
1
Ana Carolina "gay couples have the same rights as normal couples" I wonder when people like you will say siblings couples have the same rights as normal couples
1
@ansonhu8795 "Gays,les,bi,ays and trans are all ppl. It’s like saying straight people are superior. Go fuck yourself with you idealistic bullshit" He never said that. Just because theyre all people doesnt mean they can do whatever they want. Also, do you support incestuous marriage too? Theyre people afterall.
1
@satriorama4118 Exactly
1
Kri S Irrelevant. Since when did rights only pertain to exclusive groups?
1
Nirmala Prabhakaran Like I said. It doesnt matter. Equal rights is equal rights. No matter what their preference are, and no matter how exclusive they are. Rights are rights. Right?
1
Nirmala Prabhakaran Facts isnt propaganda.
1
@noobestofdamall Oh? Youre the only person Ive heard from that agreed to that. What about a mother divorcing the father and marrying her own son/daughter and having sex with them?
1
@noobestofdamall You are indeed the only person that sees nothing wrong with that. There are those that believe that marriage is there to legitimise the relationship between a man and a women for having a child together. This has pretty much been set in stone for millenniums. Any relationship outside of this man, women union to produce offspring is by definition not constitute as "marriage". Changing that definition without majority of peoples consent upsets society.
1
@noobestofdamall "Takes seconds to prove the contrary. A quick google search would do" Less than 1% of 1% of this world. A negligible amount of supporters. "So what? There are also those that don't" By "there are those", I mean the majority of the world. "Doesn't make it necessarily right" Denouncing something as not "necessarily right" doesnt automatically make you right. But if youre going to change the status quo, and change the definition of a word greatly instilled in religion and society, then be prepared for objection. "By whose definition? Yours?" In all advanced civilisation, laws were forged based on God/Heaven. So by Gods/Heavens definition. And it makes sense. If everyone was homosexual, or practised incestuous marriage, then unfortunately we would not exist today as we are. But if everyone was heterosexual, we would. We exist today is because of following these commandments/precepts.
1
@noobestofdamall "Negligible because you said so, sure" Walk out on the streets in a busy area and ask 100 people if they support incestuous marriage. Youd be lucky to get even 1. ""So what? There are also those that don't" Yeh Ill say the same thing back at you. "There are those that also thought that the Earth was flat at one point, or that the Sun revolved around the Earth, didn't make them right" "Considering how insipid and ignorant religious nuts are, it's not surprising that there would be objection" Painting all religious people with one brush aye? How do you like that if you were painted with one brush? "Blatantly false. Any civilisation with religious laws are inherently backwards and primitive" I didnt say "religious laws". I said all great civilisations based their laws from God/Heaven. Is having murder a crime religious? No. But its based from the commandments/precepts of God/Heaven. "Not relevant" 100% relevant. The concept of marriage was based upon such principle of reproduction and growing the child together as a family. The fact that you cant see this means youre not on the same page. You are dictating a change in the definition of the word marriage.
1